To Shri. Karunaakaram Raaghavam

August 5, 2007

Dear Shri. Karunaakaram Raaghavam:

Do you mean to say that you also suspect me of being Mohanraaamji?

And the word " swine " does it apply to me? Shri. Lalith has not

merely attacked Mohanraaamji....He has alleged that I am Mohanraaamji

though I had refuted it to him time and again.....Your mail also

seems to indicate such a thought process........

I would have been happy if at least you who got some intricate

clarifications on shaastraas done through me on a honorary basis had

said something like " I also had trouble with Mohanraaamji, but he

cannot be Pandit Dakshinamoorthi. Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji will not

stoop to such low levels " .

Thanks for your mail...I was undecided about my decision taken in an

upset mood in the evening about quitting the group. But your mail

has exposed one truth about the members of the group.......People who

are gentle and believe in the innate goodness of persons like me are

very silent and circumspect in their respect; They are just asking me

not to quit because " the group needs my presence! " . I have not so

far got even one mail in this group saying that Panditji would not

have done anything bad; But those who criticise others are most vocal

in raising a ruckus and joining hands - whether the subject of

criticism deserves such a censure or not. Have I ever ever spoken

one word against you in this forum; touch your heart and say!...and

when you asked a doubt did I not clarify it? Did I ask you money for

it? After getting knowledge clarifications from me, it is a nice

gesture you have shown me!

This obviously is not a place for a person like me. I have respected

my Gurus with all my heart and would not even hear one word spoken

wrongly of them. But, such a mentality is not found here.

Blessed be.

Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM

<munisevitham wrote:

>

> Namaste,

> Mr.Lalit Mishra,

>

> Thank you very much; I am happy about your perseverance in

excavating truth and shown the way to gullible glib takers. You have

torn the masks of invisible Swine. Once this swine had insulted

me " egoistic pig " [indirectly in message 73986 of 21stApril 2006],

then I had left it to God, now at last the invisible had evaporated

after addressing all the members of the forum as " spineless " .

>

> God bless you,

>

> litsol <mishra.lalit wrote:

Dear Group,

>

> It looks that a fake id of MohanRaam is created to counter to

other

> Senior Astrologers of the group, Now, it is clear, there is no

> Mohanraam existing. Mohanraam says he posted all mails from Pandit

> Dakschhinamurty's computer, He has not claimed that he posted all

> mails from my or ur's computer.

>

> So a strong doubt is, Either, it is PanditJi himself or his

people,

> whosoever it is, it's ridiculous and disgusting. MohanRaam can

enter

> into PanditJi's computer and can type in a mail and more, he can

send

> it to group.

>

> But he cant enter into my mailbox to see who are the group members

> sending mails to me , He claims that he was not a Major that i

> assumed, but what he was, he has not written ?

>

> Leave it, Group u have seen how these people who swears of veda

> culture or vedic values are in real life, I m so sad today, they

will

> talk about seers like Kanchi Sankaracharya, but what they are in

> real ?

>

> Panditji has good knowledge of astrology, Why he needs a sort of

> Mohanraam .... Why ?

>

> What u will say, ambition, greed or insecurity ? Or a wish to

become

> an icon in the field of Astrology...

>

> Have u noticed, This MOHANRAAM equates him to PT. SANJAY RATH- 44

yr,

> PV NARSIMHA RAO - 37 yr, who are half of his claimed age..., Who

is

> doing this sort of claims, who is gettting benefitted. a 86 year

old

> man ?

>

> See, this was a ghost in the group, which happen to fight with a

> Software Engineer and trapped in the broad day light, before all

7719

> members of the group.

>

> Shame !!!

>

> And i m sorry, i was made instrumental to expose, had he not said

i m

> suffering from such and such psychological disorderness, I w'd not

> have tried to expose the two faces of one man.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalith:

> >

> > You need not trouble yourself with tracing the IP

address.....You

> > will get the IP address of Panditji only if you trace it. I

have

> > been sending it from his computer only.

> >

> > Yesterday night, we had a long session of exchange; at that time

> > Panditji was asleep, and his younger brother and mother were

also

> > there in the house at that time. His computer was inside his

> locked

> > office room.

> >

> > You who speak of miracles must know that there are people

capable

> of

> > doing those things. I have consumed large amounts of food from

his

> > house which no normal human being can do.......His whole family

> knows

> > of all these. They are all perplexed by that.

> >

> > Guruji has himself traced the IP id once to his own computer

when

> he

> > got it traced through a software engineer client of his...So, it

is

> > nothing new.

> >

> > By the way, I was not a major in the Indian army during the

> > Bangladesh war....how did you assume I was only a " major " ? What

> > makes you think that I did not serve earlier wars? What makes

you

> > think that I was not a Brigadier at that time?

> >

> > Young man you have a long way to go in occult to understand that

> many

> > miracles can happen in normal life.......I have not threatened

you

> > with death or anything......I had infact openly written that I

have

> > not even cursed you.

> >

> > Guruji has no connection with me; he is not asking me to do what

I

> am

> > doing. I have been typing from his computer - sometimes even as

he

> > is chatting with clients, I have sent mails from his email id.

You

> > can check the time stamps to confirm this. One software

engineer

> who

> > traced this (on the request of Panditji himself) found that 5

> > different mails had been sent at the same time that too in

detail

> and

> > in reply to mails received at the same time (it was not a stored

> mail

> > being sent; but a live mail sent as a reply to 5 different

persons).

> >

> > So, tracing IP address will prove nothing. You may erraneously

> > assume that Panditji or someone in his family might be doing

that

> (he

> > has parallel connection and his brother uses the other

connection

> > from his room; so you might assume that if it is not Panditji,

> > someone close to him is doing that......But even that is not

true.

> > His family is as perplexed by some of my activities as you are

all!)

> >

> > If Panditji and I are the same, how come he receives my mails?

Why

> > does he write to my email id? Is it humanly possible to

maintain

> > such elaborate set up, and what purpose it will serve?

> >

> > Your doubt is not baseless, but a simple logical thinking will

tell

> > you that it is not possible for a man of his schedule to indulge

in

> > empty antics like that!

> >

> > If the group can believe this, let them believe. I have said

THE

> > TRUTH.

> >

> > Mohanraaam.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I will put my observations :

> > >

> > > Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has

good

> > > collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft and

> > > convincing.

> > >

> > > He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

> > >

> > > And this MohanRaam.

> > >

> > > Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in

english

> as

> > > Pt. Dakschhina has.

> > >

> > > U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of

> mental

> > > disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists,

discusses

> > > symptoms and suggests remedies ......

> > >

> > > Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

> > >

> > > He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult

> power,

> > > and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will curse

u,

> > will

> > > kill u.. and bla bla...

> > >

> > > Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the

> position

> > > of " Commander " or something like this ....

> > >

> > > Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army,

> participated

> > in

> > > bangladesh war...

> > >

> > > his age is 86+.

> > >

> > > now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his

designation

> is

> > > not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age

for a

> > > major in army is 35-37.

> > >

> > > bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He

can't

> be

> > > 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

> > >

> > > Now, come to, His typing...

> > >

> > > Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no mistakes,

> > > beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

> > >

> > > He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> > > occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

> > other's

> > > opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related with

Pt.

> > > Dakschhinamurty.

> > >

> > > I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his

mails,

> > But,

> > > I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail Ids.

> > >

> > > I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> <mohanraaam@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Group:

> > > >

> > > > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a nexus

> > between

> > > > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain

other

> > > > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I want

to

> > > > clarify on that.....

> > > >

> > > > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> > > Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely

have

> I

> > > come

> > > > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in this

> > > present

> > > > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do

get

> > > tensed

> > > > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> > > >

> > > > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not a " paid "

> > > agent.

> > > > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

> > intentions

> > > in

> > > > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to

sing

> his

> > > > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge

needs

> > no

> > > > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been

obvious

> > to

> > > > everyone in the group.

> > > >

> > > > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be

> aware,

> > he

> > > > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime;

when

> > > asked,

> > > > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he

felt

> it

> > is

> > > > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at the

> same

> > > > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to keep

> quite

> > > if

> > > > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > > > professional image. So, I brought him back with the promise

> that

> > I

> > > > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

> > unsavoury

> > > > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my

invitation

> > that

> > > > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did this

> only

> > > for

> > > > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very

> private

> > > > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted his

> > > > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> > > introduced

> > > > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only so

> that

> > he

> > > > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old

> members

> > > will

> > > > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> > > >

> > > > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal intentions

in

> my

> > > > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his request.

He

> > is

> > > > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his

> limits;

> > > and

> > > > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the group

> which

> > > > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt

to

> > > retain

> > > > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> > > >

> > > > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all. In

> > fact,

> > > he

> > > > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to ignore

> > him.

> > > > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to write

> again

> > > and

> > > > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into this.

> > > >

> > > > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT

SEEN

> ME

> > > EVEN

> > > > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> > > >

> > > > Blessings,

> > > > Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > >

> >

> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

web links.

>

August 5, 2007

Hare ramakrishna.

respected karunakaramji.

If some body imparted any knowledge to u they got the status of

gurus ,i dont know anything of what u say .But if u benefited from some

one pls dont hurt him

Also i use this oportunity to thank mr.rafalji when i had problem for my

son- studies only --i asked him to see the chart and he personaly giv

him remedies, if i do it he may not accept it as his rahu dasa of

confusions and his hyperactive intelligence will not take it .Now he is

doing best .

All the best to u

regrds sunil nair .

Om shreem mahalaxmai namah.

vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer "

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> Dear Shri. Karunaakaram Raaghavam:

>

> Do you mean to say that you also suspect me of being Mohanraaamji?

> And the word " swine " does it apply to me? Shri. Lalith has not

> merely attacked Mohanraaamji....He has alleged that I am Mohanraaamji

> though I had refuted it to him time and again.....Your mail also

> seems to indicate such a thought process........

>

> I would have been happy if at least you who got some intricate

> clarifications on shaastraas done through me on a honorary basis had

> said something like " I also had trouble with Mohanraaamji, but he

> cannot be Pandit Dakshinamoorthi. Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji will not

> stoop to such low levels " .

>

> Thanks for your mail...I was undecided about my decision taken in an

> upset mood in the evening about quitting the group. But your mail

> has exposed one truth about the members of the group.......People who

> are gentle and believe in the innate goodness of persons like me are

> very silent and circumspect in their respect; They are just asking me

> not to quit because " the group needs my presence! " . I have not so

> far got even one mail in this group saying that Panditji would not

> have done anything bad; But those who criticise others are most vocal

> in raising a ruckus and joining hands - whether the subject of

> criticism deserves such a censure or not. Have I ever ever spoken

> one word against you in this forum; touch your heart and say!...and

> when you asked a doubt did I not clarify it? Did I ask you money for

> it? After getting knowledge clarifications from me, it is a nice

> gesture you have shown me!

>

> This obviously is not a place for a person like me. I have respected

> my Gurus with all my heart and would not even hear one word spoken

> wrongly of them. But, such a mentality is not found here.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>

> vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM

> munisevitham@ wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> > Mr.Lalit Mishra,

> >

> > Thank you very much; I am happy about your perseverance in

> excavating truth and shown the way to gullible glib takers. You have

> torn the masks of invisible Swine. Once this swine had insulted

> me " egoistic pig " [indirectly in message 73986 of 21stApril 2006],

> then I had left it to God, now at last the invisible had evaporated

> after addressing all the members of the forum as " spineless " .

> >

> > God bless you,

> >

> > litsol mishra.lalit@ wrote:

> Dear Group,

> >

> > It looks that a fake id of MohanRaam is created to counter to

> other

> > Senior Astrologers of the group, Now, it is clear, there is no

> > Mohanraam existing. Mohanraam says he posted all mails from Pandit

> > Dakschhinamurty's computer, He has not claimed that he posted all

> > mails from my or ur's computer.

> >

> > So a strong doubt is, Either, it is PanditJi himself or his

> people,

> > whosoever it is, it's ridiculous and disgusting. MohanRaam can

> enter

> > into PanditJi's computer and can type in a mail and more, he can

> send

> > it to group.

> >

> > But he cant enter into my mailbox to see who are the group members

> > sending mails to me , He claims that he was not a Major that i

> > assumed, but what he was, he has not written ?

> >

> > Leave it, Group u have seen how these people who swears of veda

> > culture or vedic values are in real life, I m so sad today, they

> will

> > talk about seers like Kanchi Sankaracharya, but what they are in

> > real ?

> >

> > Panditji has good knowledge of astrology, Why he needs a sort of

> > Mohanraam .... Why ?

> >

> > What u will say, ambition, greed or insecurity ? Or a wish to

> become

> > an icon in the field of Astrology...

> >

> > Have u noticed, This MOHANRAAM equates him to PT. SANJAY RATH- 44

> yr,

> > PV NARSIMHA RAO - 37 yr, who are half of his claimed age..., Who

> is

> > doing this sort of claims, who is gettting benefitted. a 86 year

> old

> > man ?

> >

> > See, this was a ghost in the group, which happen to fight with a

> > Software Engineer and trapped in the broad day light, before all

> 7719

> > members of the group.

> >

> > Shame !!!

> >

> > And i m sorry, i was made instrumental to expose, had he not said

> i m

> > suffering from such and such psychological disorderness, I w'd not

> > have tried to expose the two faces of one man.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > You need not trouble yourself with tracing the IP

> address.....You

> > > will get the IP address of Panditji only if you trace it. I

> have

> > > been sending it from his computer only.

> > >

> > > Yesterday night, we had a long session of exchange; at that time

> > > Panditji was asleep, and his younger brother and mother were

> also

> > > there in the house at that time. His computer was inside his

> > locked

> > > office room.

> > >

> > > You who speak of miracles must know that there are people

> capable

> > of

> > > doing those things. I have consumed large amounts of food from

> his

> > > house which no normal human being can do.......His whole family

> > knows

> > > of all these. They are all perplexed by that.

> > >

> > > Guruji has himself traced the IP id once to his own computer

> when

> > he

> > > got it traced through a software engineer client of his...So, it

> is

> > > nothing new.

> > >

> > > By the way, I was not a major in the Indian army during the

> > > Bangladesh war....how did you assume I was only a " major " ? What

> > > makes you think that I did not serve earlier wars? What makes

> you

> > > think that I was not a Brigadier at that time?

> > >

> > > Young man you have a long way to go in occult to understand that

> > many

> > > miracles can happen in normal life.......I have not threatened

> you

> > > with death or anything......I had infact openly written that I

> have

> > > not even cursed you.

> > >

> > > Guruji has no connection with me; he is not asking me to do what

> I

> > am

> > > doing. I have been typing from his computer - sometimes even as

> he

> > > is chatting with clients, I have sent mails from his email id.

> You

> > > can check the time stamps to confirm this. One software

> engineer

> > who

> > > traced this (on the request of Panditji himself) found that 5

> > > different mails had been sent at the same time that too in

> detail

> > and

> > > in reply to mails received at the same time (it was not a stored

> > mail

> > > being sent; but a live mail sent as a reply to 5 different

> persons).

> > >

> > > So, tracing IP address will prove nothing. You may erraneously

> > > assume that Panditji or someone in his family might be doing

> that

> > (he

> > > has parallel connection and his brother uses the other

> connection

> > > from his room; so you might assume that if it is not Panditji,

> > > someone close to him is doing that......But even that is not

> true.

> > > His family is as perplexed by some of my activities as you are

> all!)

> > >

> > > If Panditji and I are the same, how come he receives my mails?

> Why

> > > does he write to my email id? Is it humanly possible to

> maintain

> > > such elaborate set up, and what purpose it will serve?

> > >

> > > Your doubt is not baseless, but a simple logical thinking will

> tell

> > > you that it is not possible for a man of his schedule to indulge

> in

> > > empty antics like that!

> > >

> > > If the group can believe this, let them believe. I have said

> THE

> > > TRUTH.

> > >

> > > Mohanraaam.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I will put my observations :

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has

> good

> > > > collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft and

> > > > convincing.

> > > >

> > > > He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

> > > >

> > > > And this MohanRaam.

> > > >

> > > > Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in

> english

> > as

> > > > Pt. Dakschhina has.

> > > >

> > > > U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of

> > mental

> > > > disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists,

> discusses

> > > > symptoms and suggests remedies ......

> > > >

> > > > Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

> > > >

> > > > He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult

> > power,

> > > > and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will curse

> u,

> > > will

> > > > kill u.. and bla bla...

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the

> > position

> > > > of " Commander " or something like this ....

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army,

> > participated

> > > in

> > > > bangladesh war...

> > > >

> > > > his age is 86+.

> > > >

> > > > now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his

> designation

> > is

> > > > not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age

> for a

> > > > major in army is 35-37.

> > > >

> > > > bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He

> can't

> > be

> > > > 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

> > > >

> > > > Now, come to, His typing...

> > > >

> > > > Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no mistakes,

> > > > beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

> > > >

> > > > He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> > > > occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

> > > other's

> > > > opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related with

> Pt.

> > > > Dakschhinamurty.

> > > >

> > > > I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his

> mails,

> > > But,

> > > > I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail Ids.

> > > >

> > > > I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Lalit.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Group:

> > > > >

> > > > > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a nexus

> > > between

> > > > > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain

> other

> > > > > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I want

> to

> > > > > clarify on that.....

> > > > >

> > > > > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> > > > Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely

> have

> > I

> > > > come

> > > > > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in this

> > > > present

> > > > > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do

> get

> > > > tensed

> > > > > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> > > > >

> > > > > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not a " paid "

> > > > agent.

> > > > > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

> > > intentions

> > > > in

> > > > > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to

> sing

> > his

> > > > > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge

> needs

> > > no

> > > > > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been

> obvious

> > > to

> > > > > everyone in the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be

> > aware,

> > > he

> > > > > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime;

> when

> > > > asked,

> > > > > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he

> felt

> > it

> > > is

> > > > > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at the

> > same

> > > > > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to keep

> > quite

> > > > if

> > > > > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > > > > professional image. So, I brought him back with the promise

> > that

> > > I

> > > > > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

> > > unsavoury

> > > > > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my

> invitation

> > > that

> > > > > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did this

> > only

> > > > for

> > > > > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very

> > private

> > > > > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted his

> > > > > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> > > > introduced

> > > > > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only so

> > that

> > > he

> > > > > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old

> > members

> > > > will

> > > > > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal intentions

> in

> > my

> > > > > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his request.

> He

> > > is

> > > > > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his

> > limits;

> > > > and

> > > > > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the group

> > which

> > > > > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt

> to

> > > > retain

> > > > > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> > > > >

> > > > > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all. In

> > > fact,

> > > > he

> > > > > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to ignore

> > > him.

> > > > > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to write

> > again

> > > > and

> > > > > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into this.

> > > > >

> > > > > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT

> SEEN

> > ME

> > > > EVEN

> > > > > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings,

> > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

> web links.

> >

August 5, 2007

Respected DakshinamoortiJi,

Please accept the most humble request. Please do not leave all of us.

Good knowledgeable people like you create pride for any place or

forum like this. You have been contributing with your abilities and

grace of god and a lot of members have benefitted from you. So,

please continue to bless your presence here. Falsehood have no feet.

Truth will automatically emerge.

Please continue here and do not leave this group.

Kind Regards,

Harcharan

vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer "

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> Dear Shri. Karunaakaram Raaghavam:

>

> Do you mean to say that you also suspect me of being Mohanraaamji?

> And the word " swine " does it apply to me? Shri. Lalith has not

> merely attacked Mohanraaamji....He has alleged that I am

Mohanraaamji

> though I had refuted it to him time and again.....Your mail also

> seems to indicate such a thought process........

>

> I would have been happy if at least you who got some intricate

> clarifications on shaastraas done through me on a honorary basis

had

> said something like " I also had trouble with Mohanraaamji, but he

> cannot be Pandit Dakshinamoorthi. Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji will not

> stoop to such low levels " .

>

> Thanks for your mail...I was undecided about my decision taken in

an

> upset mood in the evening about quitting the group. But your mail

> has exposed one truth about the members of the group.......People

who

> are gentle and believe in the innate goodness of persons like me

are

> very silent and circumspect in their respect; They are just asking

me

> not to quit because " the group needs my presence! " . I have not so

> far got even one mail in this group saying that Panditji would not

> have done anything bad; But those who criticise others are most

vocal

> in raising a ruckus and joining hands - whether the subject of

> criticism deserves such a censure or not. Have I ever ever spoken

> one word against you in this forum; touch your heart and say!...and

> when you asked a doubt did I not clarify it? Did I ask you money

for

> it? After getting knowledge clarifications from me, it is a nice

> gesture you have shown me!

>

> This obviously is not a place for a person like me. I have

respected

> my Gurus with all my heart and would not even hear one word spoken

> wrongly of them. But, such a mentality is not found here.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>

> vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM

> <munisevitham@> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> > Mr.Lalit Mishra,

> >

> > Thank you very much; I am happy about your perseverance in

> excavating truth and shown the way to gullible glib takers. You

have

> torn the masks of invisible Swine. Once this swine had insulted

> me " egoistic pig " [indirectly in message 73986 of 21stApril 2006],

> then I had left it to God, now at last the invisible had evaporated

> after addressing all the members of the forum as " spineless " .

> >

> > God bless you,

> >

> > litsol <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> Dear Group,

> >

> > It looks that a fake id of MohanRaam is created to counter to

> other

> > Senior Astrologers of the group, Now, it is clear, there is no

> > Mohanraam existing. Mohanraam says he posted all mails from

Pandit

> > Dakschhinamurty's computer, He has not claimed that he posted

all

> > mails from my or ur's computer.

> >

> > So a strong doubt is, Either, it is PanditJi himself or his

> people,

> > whosoever it is, it's ridiculous and disgusting. MohanRaam can

> enter

> > into PanditJi's computer and can type in a mail and more, he can

> send

> > it to group.

> >

> > But he cant enter into my mailbox to see who are the group

members

> > sending mails to me , He claims that he was not a Major that i

> > assumed, but what he was, he has not written ?

> >

> > Leave it, Group u have seen how these people who swears of veda

> > culture or vedic values are in real life, I m so sad today, they

> will

> > talk about seers like Kanchi Sankaracharya, but what they are in

> > real ?

> >

> > Panditji has good knowledge of astrology, Why he needs a sort of

> > Mohanraam .... Why ?

> >

> > What u will say, ambition, greed or insecurity ? Or a wish to

> become

> > an icon in the field of Astrology...

> >

> > Have u noticed, This MOHANRAAM equates him to PT. SANJAY RATH-

44

> yr,

> > PV NARSIMHA RAO - 37 yr, who are half of his claimed age..., Who

> is

> > doing this sort of claims, who is gettting benefitted. a 86 year

> old

> > man ?

> >

> > See, this was a ghost in the group, which happen to fight with a

> > Software Engineer and trapped in the broad day light, before all

> 7719

> > members of the group.

> >

> > Shame !!!

> >

> > And i m sorry, i was made instrumental to expose, had he not

said

> i m

> > suffering from such and such psychological disorderness, I w'd

not

> > have tried to expose the two faces of one man.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

<mohanraaam@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > You need not trouble yourself with tracing the IP

> address.....You

> > > will get the IP address of Panditji only if you trace it. I

> have

> > > been sending it from his computer only.

> > >

> > > Yesterday night, we had a long session of exchange; at that

time

> > > Panditji was asleep, and his younger brother and mother were

> also

> > > there in the house at that time. His computer was inside his

> > locked

> > > office room.

> > >

> > > You who speak of miracles must know that there are people

> capable

> > of

> > > doing those things. I have consumed large amounts of food

from

> his

> > > house which no normal human being can do.......His whole

family

> > knows

> > > of all these. They are all perplexed by that.

> > >

> > > Guruji has himself traced the IP id once to his own computer

> when

> > he

> > > got it traced through a software engineer client of his...So,

it

> is

> > > nothing new.

> > >

> > > By the way, I was not a major in the Indian army during the

> > > Bangladesh war....how did you assume I was only a " major " ?

What

> > > makes you think that I did not serve earlier wars? What makes

> you

> > > think that I was not a Brigadier at that time?

> > >

> > > Young man you have a long way to go in occult to understand

that

> > many

> > > miracles can happen in normal life.......I have not threatened

> you

> > > with death or anything......I had infact openly written that I

> have

> > > not even cursed you.

> > >

> > > Guruji has no connection with me; he is not asking me to do

what

> I

> > am

> > > doing. I have been typing from his computer - sometimes even

as

> he

> > > is chatting with clients, I have sent mails from his email

id.

> You

> > > can check the time stamps to confirm this. One software

> engineer

> > who

> > > traced this (on the request of Panditji himself) found that 5

> > > different mails had been sent at the same time that too in

> detail

> > and

> > > in reply to mails received at the same time (it was not a

stored

> > mail

> > > being sent; but a live mail sent as a reply to 5 different

> persons).

> > >

> > > So, tracing IP address will prove nothing. You may

erraneously

> > > assume that Panditji or someone in his family might be doing

> that

> > (he

> > > has parallel connection and his brother uses the other

> connection

> > > from his room; so you might assume that if it is not Panditji,

> > > someone close to him is doing that......But even that is not

> true.

> > > His family is as perplexed by some of my activities as you are

> all!)

> > >

> > > If Panditji and I are the same, how come he receives my mails?

> Why

> > > does he write to my email id? Is it humanly possible to

> maintain

> > > such elaborate set up, and what purpose it will serve?

> > >

> > > Your doubt is not baseless, but a simple logical thinking will

> tell

> > > you that it is not possible for a man of his schedule to

indulge

> in

> > > empty antics like that!

> > >

> > > If the group can believe this, let them believe. I have said

> THE

> > > TRUTH.

> > >

> > > Mohanraaam.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I will put my observations :

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has

> good

> > > > collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft

and

> > > > convincing.

> > > >

> > > > He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

> > > >

> > > > And this MohanRaam.

> > > >

> > > > Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in

> english

> > as

> > > > Pt. Dakschhina has.

> > > >

> > > > U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of

> > mental

> > > > disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists,

> discusses

> > > > symptoms and suggests remedies ......

> > > >

> > > > Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

> > > >

> > > > He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult

> > power,

> > > > and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will

curse

> u,

> > > will

> > > > kill u.. and bla bla...

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the

> > position

> > > > of " Commander " or something like this ....

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army,

> > participated

> > > in

> > > > bangladesh war...

> > > >

> > > > his age is 86+.

> > > >

> > > > now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his

> designation

> > is

> > > > not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age

> for a

> > > > major in army is 35-37.

> > > >

> > > > bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He

> can't

> > be

> > > > 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

> > > >

> > > > Now, come to, His typing...

> > > >

> > > > Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no

mistakes,

> > > > beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

> > > >

> > > > He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> > > > occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

> > > other's

> > > > opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related

with

> Pt.

> > > > Dakschhinamurty.

> > > >

> > > > I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his

> mails,

> > > But,

> > > > I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail

Ids.

> > > >

> > > > I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Lalit.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Group:

> > > > >

> > > > > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a

nexus

> > > between

> > > > > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain

> other

> > > > > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I

want

> to

> > > > > clarify on that.....

> > > > >

> > > > > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> > > > Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely

> have

> > I

> > > > come

> > > > > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in

this

> > > > present

> > > > > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do

> get

> > > > tensed

> > > > > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> > > > >

> > > > > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not

a " paid "

> > > > agent.

> > > > > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

> > > intentions

> > > > in

> > > > > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to

> sing

> > his

> > > > > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge

> needs

> > > no

> > > > > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been

> obvious

> > > to

> > > > > everyone in the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be

> > aware,

> > > he

> > > > > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime;

> when

> > > > asked,

> > > > > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he

> felt

> > it

> > > is

> > > > > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at

the

> > same

> > > > > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to

keep

> > quite

> > > > if

> > > > > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > > > > professional image. So, I brought him back with the

promise

> > that

> > > I

> > > > > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

> > > unsavoury

> > > > > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my

> invitation

> > > that

> > > > > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did

this

> > only

> > > > for

> > > > > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very

> > private

> > > > > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted

his

> > > > > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> > > > introduced

> > > > > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only

so

> > that

> > > he

> > > > > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old

> > members

> > > > will

> > > > > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal

intentions

> in

> > my

> > > > > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his

request.

> He

> > > is

> > > > > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his

> > limits;

> > > > and

> > > > > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the

group

> > which

> > > > > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt

> to

> > > > retain

> > > > > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> > > > >

> > > > > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all.

In

> > > fact,

> > > > he

> > > > > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to

ignore

> > > him.

> > > > > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to

write

> > again

> > > > and

> > > > > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into

this.

> > > > >

> > > > > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT

> SEEN

> > ME

> > > > EVEN

> > > > > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings,

> > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

> web links.

> >

August 5, 2007

dear pandit dakshinamoorthiji

there is a saying that people throw stones ONLY at a tree that is

bearing so many fruits.

out of my brotherly fraternal love, i earnestly request you to treat

ALL your critics like those who are seeking more and more fruits

(knowledge sharing mails) from you and keep obliging them in future

as well, as you have been doing all along.

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer "

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> Dear Shri. Karunaakaram Raaghavam:

>

> Do you mean to say that you also suspect me of being Mohanraaamji?

> And the word " swine " does it apply to me? Shri. Lalith has not

> merely attacked Mohanraaamji....He has alleged that I am

Mohanraaamji

> though I had refuted it to him time and again.....Your mail also

> seems to indicate such a thought process........

>

> I would have been happy if at least you who got some intricate

> clarifications on shaastraas done through me on a honorary basis

had

> said something like " I also had trouble with Mohanraaamji, but he

> cannot be Pandit Dakshinamoorthi. Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji will not

> stoop to such low levels " .

>

> Thanks for your mail...I was undecided about my decision taken in

an

> upset mood in the evening about quitting the group. But your mail

> has exposed one truth about the members of the group.......People

who

> are gentle and believe in the innate goodness of persons like me

are

> very silent and circumspect in their respect; They are just asking

me

> not to quit because " the group needs my presence! " . I have not so

> far got even one mail in this group saying that Panditji would not

> have done anything bad; But those who criticise others are most

vocal

> in raising a ruckus and joining hands - whether the subject of

> criticism deserves such a censure or not. Have I ever ever spoken

> one word against you in this forum; touch your heart and say!...and

> when you asked a doubt did I not clarify it? Did I ask you money

for

> it? After getting knowledge clarifications from me, it is a nice

> gesture you have shown me!

>

> This obviously is not a place for a person like me. I have

respected

> my Gurus with all my heart and would not even hear one word spoken

> wrongly of them. But, such a mentality is not found here.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>

> vedic astrology , KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM

> <munisevitham@> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> > Mr.Lalit Mishra,

> >

> > Thank you very much; I am happy about your perseverance in

> excavating truth and shown the way to gullible glib takers. You

have

> torn the masks of invisible Swine. Once this swine had insulted

> me " egoistic pig " [indirectly in message 73986 of 21stApril 2006],

> then I had left it to God, now at last the invisible had evaporated

> after addressing all the members of the forum as " spineless " .

> >

> > God bless you,

> >

> > litsol <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> Dear Group,

> >

> > It looks that a fake id of MohanRaam is created to counter to

> other

> > Senior Astrologers of the group, Now, it is clear, there is no

> > Mohanraam existing. Mohanraam says he posted all mails from

Pandit

> > Dakschhinamurty's computer, He has not claimed that he posted

all

> > mails from my or ur's computer.

> >

> > So a strong doubt is, Either, it is PanditJi himself or his

> people,

> > whosoever it is, it's ridiculous and disgusting. MohanRaam can

> enter

> > into PanditJi's computer and can type in a mail and more, he can

> send

> > it to group.

> >

> > But he cant enter into my mailbox to see who are the group

members

> > sending mails to me , He claims that he was not a Major that i

> > assumed, but what he was, he has not written ?

> >

> > Leave it, Group u have seen how these people who swears of veda

> > culture or vedic values are in real life, I m so sad today, they

> will

> > talk about seers like Kanchi Sankaracharya, but what they are in

> > real ?

> >

> > Panditji has good knowledge of astrology, Why he needs a sort of

> > Mohanraam .... Why ?

> >

> > What u will say, ambition, greed or insecurity ? Or a wish to

> become

> > an icon in the field of Astrology...

> >

> > Have u noticed, This MOHANRAAM equates him to PT. SANJAY RATH-

44

> yr,

> > PV NARSIMHA RAO - 37 yr, who are half of his claimed age..., Who

> is

> > doing this sort of claims, who is gettting benefitted. a 86 year

> old

> > man ?

> >

> > See, this was a ghost in the group, which happen to fight with a

> > Software Engineer and trapped in the broad day light, before all

> 7719

> > members of the group.

> >

> > Shame !!!

> >

> > And i m sorry, i was made instrumental to expose, had he not

said

> i m

> > suffering from such and such psychological disorderness, I w'd

not

> > have tried to expose the two faces of one man.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

<mohanraaam@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > You need not trouble yourself with tracing the IP

> address.....You

> > > will get the IP address of Panditji only if you trace it. I

> have

> > > been sending it from his computer only.

> > >

> > > Yesterday night, we had a long session of exchange; at that

time

> > > Panditji was asleep, and his younger brother and mother were

> also

> > > there in the house at that time. His computer was inside his

> > locked

> > > office room.

> > >

> > > You who speak of miracles must know that there are people

> capable

> > of

> > > doing those things. I have consumed large amounts of food

from

> his

> > > house which no normal human being can do.......His whole

family

> > knows

> > > of all these. They are all perplexed by that.

> > >

> > > Guruji has himself traced the IP id once to his own computer

> when

> > he

> > > got it traced through a software engineer client of his...So,

it

> is

> > > nothing new.

> > >

> > > By the way, I was not a major in the Indian army during the

> > > Bangladesh war....how did you assume I was only a " major " ?

What

> > > makes you think that I did not serve earlier wars? What makes

> you

> > > think that I was not a Brigadier at that time?

> > >

> > > Young man you have a long way to go in occult to understand

that

> > many

> > > miracles can happen in normal life.......I have not threatened

> you

> > > with death or anything......I had infact openly written that I

> have

> > > not even cursed you.

> > >

> > > Guruji has no connection with me; he is not asking me to do

what

> I

> > am

> > > doing. I have been typing from his computer - sometimes even

as

> he

> > > is chatting with clients, I have sent mails from his email

id.

> You

> > > can check the time stamps to confirm this. One software

> engineer

> > who

> > > traced this (on the request of Panditji himself) found that 5

> > > different mails had been sent at the same time that too in

> detail

> > and

> > > in reply to mails received at the same time (it was not a

stored

> > mail

> > > being sent; but a live mail sent as a reply to 5 different

> persons).

> > >

> > > So, tracing IP address will prove nothing. You may

erraneously

> > > assume that Panditji or someone in his family might be doing

> that

> > (he

> > > has parallel connection and his brother uses the other

> connection

> > > from his room; so you might assume that if it is not Panditji,

> > > someone close to him is doing that......But even that is not

> true.

> > > His family is as perplexed by some of my activities as you are

> all!)

> > >

> > > If Panditji and I are the same, how come he receives my mails?

> Why

> > > does he write to my email id? Is it humanly possible to

> maintain

> > > such elaborate set up, and what purpose it will serve?

> > >

> > > Your doubt is not baseless, but a simple logical thinking will

> tell

> > > you that it is not possible for a man of his schedule to

indulge

> in

> > > empty antics like that!

> > >

> > > If the group can believe this, let them believe. I have said

> THE

> > > TRUTH.

> > >

> > > Mohanraaam.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I will put my observations :

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has

> good

> > > > collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft

and

> > > > convincing.

> > > >

> > > > He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

> > > >

> > > > And this MohanRaam.

> > > >

> > > > Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in

> english

> > as

> > > > Pt. Dakschhina has.

> > > >

> > > > U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of

> > mental

> > > > disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists,

> discusses

> > > > symptoms and suggests remedies ......

> > > >

> > > > Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

> > > >

> > > > He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult

> > power,

> > > > and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will

curse

> u,

> > > will

> > > > kill u.. and bla bla...

> > > >

> > > > Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the

> > position

> > > > of " Commander " or something like this ....

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army,

> > participated

> > > in

> > > > bangladesh war...

> > > >

> > > > his age is 86+.

> > > >

> > > > now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his

> designation

> > is

> > > > not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age

> for a

> > > > major in army is 35-37.

> > > >

> > > > bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He

> can't

> > be

> > > > 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

> > > >

> > > > Now, come to, His typing...

> > > >

> > > > Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no

mistakes,

> > > > beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

> > > >

> > > > He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> > > > occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

> > > other's

> > > > opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related

with

> Pt.

> > > > Dakschhinamurty.

> > > >

> > > > I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his

> mails,

> > > But,

> > > > I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail

Ids.

> > > >

> > > > I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Lalit.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Group:

> > > > >

> > > > > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a

nexus

> > > between

> > > > > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain

> other

> > > > > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I

want

> to

> > > > > clarify on that.....

> > > > >

> > > > > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> > > > Dakshinamoorthiji

> > > > > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely

> have

> > I

> > > > come

> > > > > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in

this

> > > > present

> > > > > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do

> get

> > > > tensed

> > > > > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> > > > >

> > > > > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not

a " paid "

> > > > agent.

> > > > > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

> > > intentions

> > > > in

> > > > > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to

> sing

> > his

> > > > > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge

> needs

> > > no

> > > > > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been

> obvious

> > > to

> > > > > everyone in the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be

> > aware,

> > > he

> > > > > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime;

> when

> > > > asked,

> > > > > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he

> felt

> > it

> > > is

> > > > > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at

the

> > same

> > > > > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to

keep

> > quite

> > > > if

> > > > > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > > > > professional image. So, I brought him back with the

promise

> > that

> > > I

> > > > > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

> > > unsavoury

> > > > > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my

> invitation

> > > that

> > > > > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did

this

> > only

> > > > for

> > > > > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very

> > private

> > > > > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted

his

> > > > > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> > > > introduced

> > > > > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only

so

> > that

> > > he

> > > > > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old

> > members

> > > > will

> > > > > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> > > > >

> > > > > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal

intentions

> in

> > my

> > > > > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his

request.

> He

> > > is

> > > > > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his

> > limits;

> > > > and

> > > > > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the

group

> > which

> > > > > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt

> to

> > > > retain

> > > > > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> > > > >

> > > > > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all.

In

> > > fact,

> > > > he

> > > > > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to

ignore

> > > him.

> > > > > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to

write

> > again

> > > > and

> > > > > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into

this.

> > > > >

> > > > > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT

> SEEN

> > ME

> > > > EVEN

> > > > > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings,

> > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

> web links.

> >

August 5, 2007

Dear Shri.Dakshinamoorthyji,

To make us believe others pain when some one is hurt orally / physically, my

Commerce professor used to quote “when a physical stone falls on a physical

body, that body alone realize the abstract pain which others may not unaware”.

It is also true in my case, which you may agree with the following; during a

course of our Astrological discussions, he intruded as an uninvited guest and

abused me. The pain and mental agony I under went on 21st April 2006[ref.message

93986] may be an enjoyable jock to others. Your sisya / sirushiti abused me with

most derogatory obnoxious words:”egoistic pig” which you may plead your

innocence now; where were you gone then? Why you have failed to prevail on him

then?

The above are the doubts lingering in my heart to believe the allegations

framed against you by Mr.Lalitji.

I am also now given to understand from your posts that he has placed you in

tight corners, by hawking away your e-mail “pass word”; you should have taken

corrective steps with all your experiences you had with him and kept under

strict security vigil your pass word and ID. He had already tom-tamed that he is

a retired Military Major [in his ‘Guruvaiyurappan thulaabaaram makuthvam’

narration episode, whether he is a culprit or otherwise, a time may come to

verify his antecedents by the “STATE / CENTARAL “AUTHORITIES when he commits

serious crime / fraud with your “pass word”.

“alpha saakuvaasa praanasankatam”

Please kindly lodge a criminal police compliant on him or else he may even

hijack your changed e-mail “pass word” and misuse it which may even invite to

institute a criminal conspiracy case against you by the “STATE” or else be ready

for ‘test of fire’as mother SeethaDevi under went to establish HER innocence.

I HAVE NO ANY PERSONAL VENDATA AGAINST YOU.

dakshinastrologer <dakshinastrologer wrote: