Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Help-Lajmi ji

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO

END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP-

IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of

authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of

hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri

M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256

14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 -

MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs

IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia

<kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about

"Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at

22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat

14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian

and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the

correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD

IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB

for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 :

03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub

in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup :

NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN

ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that

never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter

on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON

MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given

in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's

software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star :

Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because

Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Get your email and more, right on the new .com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are

conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of

about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i

many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends

at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun

23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found

falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the

IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...

Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH

SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO

02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN

MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your

friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile

from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Get your email and more, right on the new .com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Kanak, If I am not mistaken,I have already replied to this earlier...The K.P. rule is... " whenever in doubt,take the RPs immediately, to guide you...The Asc star-lord or sub-lord will help you choose the correct picture..." ! With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I

STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove

that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths

that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE

WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO

end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my

personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of

the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N

? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN

JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and

JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as

Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more

powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

<< Get your email and more, right on the new .com

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i

many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:

Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th

sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN.

5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON -

OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our

self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his

book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham

has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g.

9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU

332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth

Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See

Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star

lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good

luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at

07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN

SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji

many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has

been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256

14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 -

MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs

IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct. There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not get the same answer. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as

RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times

give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:

Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th

sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN.

5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON -

OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our

self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his

book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham

has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g.

9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU

332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth

Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See

Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I am new to this group and want to learn astrology. Please can you recommend some books or websites that i can access and learn from. thanks in advance Sonia Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it

correct. There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not get the same answer. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us

and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP

sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But,

where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the

best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly

use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1

11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah

28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to

discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear

Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER

COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC=

237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 -

MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time

03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the

following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're

invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Raichur ji, !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement. 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every

time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy? 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement? 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future. 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings,

.. 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord. This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future. Very anxious, Kanak Bosmia Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method

when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct. There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not get the same answer. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time).

Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS

IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star

for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/-

1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT

-R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a

9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about

it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by

maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N

? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN

JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and

JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as

Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more

powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

<< Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Sonia Kumar, First of all,buy the 6 Krishnamurthi Padhdhati Readers...after studying them carefully,you may go in for the various other books,especially the book..."Astrosecrets & K.P., by the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham"... Later you may buy books to specialise on different subjects...like Profession by K.Subramaniam etc.,... A list of books will be found printed on the covers of these readers...you could choose from among them... With best wishes, Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Sonia Kumar <sonia_kumar1002 wrote: I am new to this group and want to learn astrology. Please can you recommend some books or websites that i can access and learn from. thanks in advance Sonia Raichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct. There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not get the same answer. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU

TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of

birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is

totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006

5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R

6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH

AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind

if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or

Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N

? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN

JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and

JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as

Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more

powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

<< Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

BOOKS

 

KP Readers I to VI

 

Chandrakant R. Bhatt:

1) Nakshatra Chintamani

2) Furhter Light on Nakshatra Chintamani

 

Astrosecrets & KP Part I to III

 

All are available on line from my reliable KP book supplier,

 

Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u

http://www.astroclinica.com

 

 

WEBSITES

 

http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp_stellar_astrology.htm

 

http://amkcm.tripod.com/

 

http://www.logy.com/

 

http://vedastrokp.blogspot.com/

 

http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/

 

 

 

 

, Sonia Kumar <sonia_kumar1002

wrote:

>

> I am new to this group and want to learn astrology. Please can you

recommend some books or websites that i can access and learn from.

> thanks in advance

> Sonia

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the

person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a

way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

you may not get it correct.

>

> There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

when the question on is asked.

>

> The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> get the same answer.

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

>

> More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which

is releted with question:

> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP.

if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we

found very correct time.

>

> A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told

me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP

so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

>

> regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> Dear Kanak

> Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final

test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your

case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you

should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

>

> good luck

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all

planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0

15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always

conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK

FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with

Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

>

> i am try to give more detail:

> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

>

> Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

>

> bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

sub for selection.

>

> as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

>

> Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

>

> regards

> kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> DEAR Hasmukhrai

> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS

IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span

of about 10-15 minutes.

>

> But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

ASC

> is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or

indirectly.

>

> check and let us have the results of your study.

>

> good luck

>

> Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:

> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord

of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours

must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours.

Is this possible?

>

> Good luck and all the best.

>

> Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

>

> First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules

is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

EXPERIANCE.

>

> Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

>

> Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

>

> Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

candidate for 9th sublord.

>

> Look at todays position:

>

> --------------------------------

----------

> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

H. 29 M. 47 S.

> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

>

> -

--------

>

> SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL

DAY MOON - OK)

> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

jup.-OK

> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

>

> That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

right?

> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my

opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this

rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 &

3. i suggest only part one.

>

> Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like

story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree

with me.

>

>

> with best regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

> Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

out of hand...

> May I draw your attention to the chapter on

Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> He says " I have observed that in the Star or

Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

transitting at the TOB...

> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....

> And...this rule,also of the late Shri

M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted

by you...

> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the

rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> Kindly think about it carefully,

Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and

Kamakaraka respectively...

> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> With kind regards,

> L.Y.Rao.

>

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Vijay ji,

>

> I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

>

> bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN

EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF

RP BITHER COME SAME.

> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

is MAR.not match.

>

> 03-09-2006 13:52:15

>

> DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

03,09,2006

> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> TIME:24 HR BASIS not

AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15

> DAY LORD IS SUN.

> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

>

> ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

Asc. = Birth MOON and

> RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH

are in Conj.)

> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

we have two more RP

> MER and JUP.

> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we

give more wight to node

> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> Asc for this time is as under:

> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

all are same as RP

> Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

>

> All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

Raichur's software.

>

> Regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

the correct

> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

>

> Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote:

> Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

>

> Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

TOB is not accurately known.

>

> Female

> 18-08-1978

> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> Allahabad (UP)

> 81E51, 25N27

>

> Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

>

> Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

Gemini to Cancer.

>

> It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

>

> Thanks and Regards,

>

> Vijay Kumar

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

Small Business.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> Astrological services par excellence

> http://www.astroclinica.com

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

call rates.

>

>

>

>

>

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear All,

 

Let me repeat:

 

Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct

because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time and

place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind answer

to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in

Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in

Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)

 

Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth

records are below:

 

Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

 

Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP

astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level,

with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers etc.

and also depending the nature of devine science.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

P.S.

 

Msg#4682 of this Group

 

Dear Members,

I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study on

300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number since

for the present study this appears sufficient.

 

I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if

members so suggest.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

 

 

FILE SECTION OF THIS GROUP

 

Rectification Study

A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification

pandeypunit

May 28, 2005

 

Study of AA - Records (Final).doc

Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27,

2005

 

Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)

May 27, 2005

Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy

ranga

 

I have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW.

Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take a

break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time

rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to be

sufficient.

 

Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to

include the individual record details in this document. If anyone is

interested, I can make it available separately.

 

Here are the latest results.

Description

(Total No. of Records: 300) Passes Fails

Correct Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)

Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)

Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)

Incorrect (-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)

Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)

Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)

Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)

Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)

Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)

 

Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

 

 

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at

deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to

understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in

KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP

astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly

fallacy statement.

>

> 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement.

In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that

situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we

all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his

pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction

they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER

BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance

to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one

pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to

change our statement about accurecy?

>

> 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct,

one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this

group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is

totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new

comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer

on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in

BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then

are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi

is only last statement?

>

> 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection

in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are

liable for that in future.

>

> 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry

if i heart anyonce feelings, .

>

> 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's

rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine

planet conected with MOON star Lord.

>

> This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on

Sanmugam's Rule in future.

>

> Very anxious,

> Kanak Bosmia

>

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the

person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a

way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

you may not get it correct.

>

> There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

when the question on is asked.

>

> The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> get the same answer.

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

>

> More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which

is releted with question:

> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP.

if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we

found very correct time.

>

> A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told

me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP

so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

>

> regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> Dear Kanak

> Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final

test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your

case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you

should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

>

> good luck

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all

planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0

15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always

conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK

FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with

Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

>

> i am try to give more detail:

> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

>

> Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

>

> bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

sub for selection.

>

> as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

>

> Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

>

> regards

> kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> DEAR Hasmukhrai

> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS

IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span

of about 10-15 minutes.

>

> But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

ASC

> is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or

indirectly.

>

> check and let us have the results of your study.

>

> good luck

>

> Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:

> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord

of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours

must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours.

Is this possible?

>

> Good luck and all the best.

>

> Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

>

> First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules

is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

EXPERIANCE.

>

> Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

>

> Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

>

> Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

candidate for 9th sublord.

>

> Look at todays position:

>

> --------------------------------

----------

> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

H. 29 M. 47 S.

> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

>

> -

--------

>

> SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL

DAY MOON - OK)

> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

jup.-OK

> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

>

> That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

right?

> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my

opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this

rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 &

3. i suggest only part one.

>

> Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like

story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree

with me.

>

>

> with best regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

> Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

out of hand...

> May I draw your attention to the chapter on

Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> He says " I have observed that in the Star or

Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

transitting at the TOB...

> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....

> And...this rule,also of the late Shri

M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted

by you...

> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the

rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> Kindly think about it carefully,

Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and

Kamakaraka respectively...

> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> With kind regards,

> L.Y.Rao.

>

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Vijay ji,

>

> I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

>

> bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN

EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF

RP BITHER COME SAME.

> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

is MAR.not match.

>

> 03-09-2006 13:52:15

>

> DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

03,09,2006

> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> TIME:24 HR BASIS not

AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15

> DAY LORD IS SUN.

> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

>

> ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

Asc. = Birth MOON and

> RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH

are in Conj.)

> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

we have two more RP

> MER and JUP.

> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we

give more wight to node

> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> Asc for this time is as under:

> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

all are same as RP

> Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

>

> All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

Raichur's software.

>

> Regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

the correct

> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

>

> Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote:

> Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

>

> Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

TOB is not accurately known.

>

> Female

> 18-08-1978

> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> Allahabad (UP)

> 81E51, 25N27

>

> Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

>

> Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

Gemini to Cancer.

>

> It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

>

> Thanks and Regards,

>

> Vijay Kumar

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

Small Business.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> Astrological services par excellence

> http://www.astroclinica.com

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

call rates.

>

>

>

>

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Tin Win ji, I agree with you rectified by RP is not 100%, but the best what is availbe with us, and i think you agree with me.also i dont understand why we try to check agin and agin birthtime? to prove KP is only scientific method? if native not rise any doubt about his/her birthime astrologer have not to try to rectify time. A very resent exmple is PLUTO. befor some days as per science pluto is one of planet but today pluto is not planet. in sceince there is nothing fix.Rules will change time by time and after any new finding then why not in KP? if we call KP is scientyfic mathod then we have to ready for accept change or new out of BOOKS. i request all seniore memebrs of this group to think on it and give his opinion, i dont mind if your opinion is derrefance with me. regards Kanaktw853

<tw853 wrote: Dear All,Let me repeat:Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time and place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind answer to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth records are

below:Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level, with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers etc.and also depending the nature of devine science. Regards,twP.S.Msg#4682 of this GroupDear Members,I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study on 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number since for the present study this appears sufficient.I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if members so suggest.Regards,RangarajanFILE SECTION OF THIS GROUPRectification Study A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification pandeypunit May 28,

2005Study of AA - Records (Final).doc Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27, 2005Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)May 27, 2005Rangarajan Krishnamoorthyranga (AT) mmsindia (DOT) comI have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW. Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take a break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to be sufficient.Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to include the individual record details in this document. If anyone is interested, I can make it available separately.Here are the latest results.Description(Total No. of Records: 300) Passes FailsCorrect Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)Incorrect

(-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time. , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer

never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then

why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very

anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not > get the same answer. > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More

perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.> > regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a

relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for

selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta

<astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet "

and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> > --> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> > > > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB

OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i

dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it

carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA

METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r

<raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com >

> > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new

.com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > >

> > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.>>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Kanak,

 

1. I can agree with you upto this point.

 

2. We need to be open minded, not one track minded and reasearch

minded to continue the research requoting a valuable statement of

our revered Guruji KSK from Dr. Kar's article,

 

" My friends, we have come upto this-- you should continue the

research and you may reach to further truth " . (KP & Astrology Year

Book 1996 page 63)

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Tin Win ji,

>

> I agree with you rectified by RP is not 100%, but the best what

is availbe with us, and i think you agree with me.also i dont

understand why we try to check agin and agin birthtime? to prove KP

is only scientific method? if native not rise any doubt about

his/her birthime astrologer have not to try to rectify time.

>

> A very resent exmple is PLUTO. befor some days as per science

pluto is one of planet but today pluto is not planet. in sceince

there is nothing fix.Rules will change time by time and after any

new finding then why not in KP? if we call KP is scientyfic mathod

then we have to ready for accept change or new out of BOOKS.

>

> i request all seniore memebrs of this group to think on it and

give his opinion, i dont mind if your opinion is derrefance with me.

>

> regards

> Kanak

> tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> Dear All,

>

> Let me repeat:

>

> Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct

> because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time

and

> place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind

answer

> to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in

> Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in

> Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)

>

> Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth

> records are below:

>

> Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

> starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

>

> Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP

> astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level,

> with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers

etc.

> and also depending the nature of devine science.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> P.S.

>

> Msg#4682 of this Group

>

> Dear Members,

> I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study

on

> 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number

since

> for the present study this appears sufficient.

>

> I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if

> members so suggest.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

> FILE SECTION OF THIS GROUP

>

> Rectification Study

> A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification

> pandeypunit

> May 28, 2005

>

> Study of AA - Records (Final).doc

> Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27,

> 2005

>

> Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)

> May 27, 2005

> Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy

> ranga

>

> I have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW.

> Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take

a

> break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time

> rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to

be

> sufficient.

>

> Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to

> include the individual record details in this document. If anyone

is

> interested, I can make it available separately.

>

> Here are the latest results.

> Description

> (Total No. of Records: 300) Passes Fails

> Correct Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)

> Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)

> Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)

> Incorrect (-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

> Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)

> Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)

> Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

> Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)

> Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

> Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)

> Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

> Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)

> Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)

>

> Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

> starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

>

> , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at

> deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to

> understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in

> KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP

> astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly

> fallacy statement.

> >

> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement.

> In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that

> situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but

we

> all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his

> pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction

> they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY

OTHER

> BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance

> to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one

> pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to

> change our statement about accurecy?

> >

> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct,

> one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this

> group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is

> totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist

new

> comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide

newcomer

> on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen

in

> BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then

> are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi

> is only last statement?

> >

> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection

> in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we

are

> liable for that in future.

> >

> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry

> if i heart anyonce feelings, .

> >

> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's

> rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine

> planet conected with MOON star Lord.

> >

> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on

> Sanmugam's Rule in future.

> >

> > Very anxious,

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

> method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when

the

> person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in

a

> way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

> you may not get it correct.

> >

> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

> when the question on is asked.

> >

> > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

> different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> > get the same answer.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

> Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

> >

> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

> ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord

which

> is releted with question:

> > for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

> Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in

RP.

> if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking

we

> found very correct time.

> >

> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told

> me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was

JUP

> so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

> >

> > regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak

> > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final

> test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In

your

> case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you

> should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

> 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs.

all

> planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10

t0

> 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always

> conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK

> FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection

with

> Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

> >

> > i am try to give more detail:

> > for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

> >

> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> > next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

> >

> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

> sub for selection.

> >

> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

> all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

> >

> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > DEAR Hasmukhrai

> > This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

> is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE

INCIDENTS

> IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

> CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span

> of about 10-15 minutes.

> >

> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

> ASC

> > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or

> indirectly.

> >

> > check and let us have the results of your study.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik@> wrote:

> > If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord

> of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

> Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours

> must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24

hours.

> Is this possible?

> >

> > Good luck and all the best.

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

> >

> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

> perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

> starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this

rules

> is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

> SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

> EXPERIANCE.

> >

> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

> of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

> and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

> >

> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

> JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

> IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

> >

> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

> candidate for 9th sublord.

> >

> > Look at todays position:

> >

> > -------------------------

> ----------

> > DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

> H. 29 M. 47 S.

> > Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> > SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> > MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> > MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> > MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> > JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> > (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

> >

> > -------------------------

> --------

> >

> > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

> JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30

ALL

> DAY MOON - OK)

> > MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> > MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> > VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

> jup.-OK

> > SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> > RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> > KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

> >

> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

> them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

> right?

> > I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

> and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my

> opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this

> rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2

&

> 3. i suggest only part one.

> >

> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

> many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

> even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

> with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book

like

> story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

> way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can

disagree

> with me.

> >

> >

> > with best regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> > You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

> out of hand...

> > May I draw your attention to the chapter on

> Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> > He says " I have observed that in the Star or

> Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

> transitting at the TOB...

> > For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

> time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth

cusp....

> > And...this rule,also of the late Shri

> M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted

> by you...

> > The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

> rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the

> rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> > Kindly think about it carefully,

> Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and

> Kamakaraka respectively...

> > Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> > With kind regards,

> > L.Y.Rao.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Vijay ji,

> >

> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

> prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

> >

> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

> THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT

HAPPN

> EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF

> RP BITHER COME SAME.

> > If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

> is MAR.not match.

> >

> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15

> >

> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

> 03,09,2006

> > pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> > WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> > TIME:24 HR BASIS not

> AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15

> > DAY LORD IS SUN.

> > ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> > MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> > KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

> >

> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> > MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> > From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> > 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> > Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> > 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> > 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> > 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> > 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> > 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> > 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> > 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> > 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> > I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

> Asc. = Birth MOON and

> > RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> > we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH

> are in Conj.)

> > MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

> we have two more RP

> > MER and JUP.

> > But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we

> give more wight to node

> > and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > Asc for this time is as under:

> > For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> > For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> > In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> all are same as RP

> > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

> >

> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

> Raichur's software.

> >

> > Regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

> the correct

> > time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

> >

> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51@> wrote:

> > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

> >

> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

> TOB is not accurately known.

> >

> > Female

> > 18-08-1978

> > 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> > Allahabad (UP)

> > 81E51, 25N27

> >

> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

> >

> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

> Gemini to Cancer.

> >

> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards,

> >

> > Vijay Kumar

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

> Small Business.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

> Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

> Version 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> > Astrological services par excellence

> > http://www.astroclinica.com

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

> Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

> Version 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

> call rates.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

> >

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

>

> Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Twji, I am very much surprised after seeing your posing as well as old postings. if Birth rectification is not having proper rule then there is no use to follow this system! I am following RBT(Rectification of Birth Time) like Birth Asc and Current Moon from past 6 yrs. i feel the method which i follow that is giving amazing results. and you given reference of rangarajan and kuppu ganapathi.'s postings...based on RBT. i like to tell that ranga and ganapathi are not authoraty of KP system. and any one ready to give authontication and relaiablity of data which they used in thier research? first how they understood the RBT techque that is very importent. in that erlyer posting they only giving the % percentage of result. but not they explained what is the connectivity between ASC and MOON or which techniqe

they followed. Basicaly i don't like the people doing research on the bulk data of horoscope. which kanak also done based on marriage, i like his effort...but without knowing the authantication of data doing research is not that much good.some time it breake the confidence on system which we following. so i request people who doing research they can use thier own data which they getting in thier practice. You told in you posting that diffrent astrologer wil get diffrent asnwer if they used RBT based on RP. i feel this is wrong. if we use RP in right way then it give same result for every one. in my experiance RP gives more result compare to Natal and horary chart.(i am prediction only with RP without using Natal and horary) Unfortunatly KSK can't able to give more information about RBT in his Readers and his mag. but others after his life time (affter 20yrs) they published the

books about RBT. that's not much useful for KP astrologer. becoz in same book they used verious techqune and all failure methodolgy.simple i can tell pls avoid that books. in other forum i already posted how to do RBT based on RP. if people intrested i can also do same and possible i wil give direct demo in CHAT session. if any people intrested then i can Rectifiy the birth for one or 2 charts and explain how it done. i always use RP for RBT. i never get past events from native. i belive RP 100% so it giving more result to me. finlay i want to tell TWji. pls post your own view like how u use RBT. we doenst need reference from earlyer posting and others technique in books which unreliable. along with your method we get others technique then we can check and tell how it works.. Swami Omkar tw853

<tw853 wrote: Dear All,Let me repeat:Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time and place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind answer to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth records are

below:Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level, with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers etc.and also depending the nature of devine science. Regards,twP.S.Msg#4682 of this GroupDear Members,I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study on 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number since for the present study this appears sufficient.I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if members so suggest.Regards,RangarajanFILE SECTION OF THIS GROUPRectification Study A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification pandeypunit May 28,

2005Study of AA - Records (Final).doc Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27, 2005Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)May 27, 2005Rangarajan Krishnamoorthyranga (AT) mmsindia (DOT) comI have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW. Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take a break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to be sufficient.Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to include the individual record details in this document. If anyone is interested, I can make it available separately.Here are the latest results.Description(Total No. of Records: 300) Passes FailsCorrect Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)Incorrect

(-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time. , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer

never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then

why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very

anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not > get the same answer. > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More

perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.> > regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a

relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for

selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta

<astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet "

and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> > --> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> > > > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB

OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i

dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it

carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA

METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r

<raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com >

> > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new

.com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > >

> > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.>

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Friends,

 

 

From the research carried out by Kanakbhai,it is clear

there is no one accurate method for 'correct'prediction in every case.

 

Among the many systems available in use, KP is positively a simpler

system, hence it is becoming more popular.It may offend the

fundementalists in KP; a more mature approach would be to have a

cross check from one or another system to ensure the confidence.

 

Take for example the fundemntal theory of the sub lord of

the Lagna to be the starlord of the Moon. In many cases it does not

work out and any correction made to manipulate the Sublord planet

results in exaggeratedly different birth times.When you question the

querent the accuracy of recording the birth time it creates more

trouble.

Arising out this controversey is Khullar's theory of sub-

sub lord,which narrows down the search for a 'more' correct birth

time.Life events are the final judges.

 

The use of RPs have also not proved beneficial in many

cases, because once you include Rahu and Ketu, you end up with more

RPs than you desire.Elimination of planets from the scope becomes a

problem.I had raised this issue a year ago,whether Rahu aspect is

5,7,9 or anything else.Vedic astrologers like Sanjay Rath also add

12th and 2nd aspect too, if you have heard his audio files.

 

If the members recall, a year ago, aspects and

conjunctions were treated as minor significators and hence

ignored.Subsequently the concept of orb of 3deg 20sec was introduced.

The 4 step theory,was then brought in,as an improvement.Much

prominence was not given because the theory was largely restricted to

Marathi speaking audience by Sri Gondhalekar.In a practical mannner,

Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate into simple English, the

theory.The aspects of Aspects and conjunctions play a very important

role along with RPs.

 

Conclusion.I could only conclude from the collective

wisdom of the stalwarts of this group, prediction of each and every

case is a research in itself.Acceptance of more than one system, is

not a reflection on the capabalities of the asrologer.Fortunately we

have research minded friends like Kanakbhai,always willing to go the

extra mile, results apart. We need to go beyond the " correct " birth

time concept.

 

My apologies to any one hurt by my observations.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- In , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer

place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to

understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP

but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP

astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly

fallacy statement.

>

> 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement.

In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that

situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we

all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his

pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction

they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER

BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to

Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict

right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our

statement about accurecy?

>

> 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one

time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group

and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly

falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer

to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on

correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in

BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are

you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is

only last statement?

>

> 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in

our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are

liable for that in future.

>

> 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry

if i heart anyonce feelings, .

>

> 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's

rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine

planet conected with MOON star Lord.

>

> This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on

Sanmugam's Rule in future.

>

> Very anxious,

> Kanak Bosmia

>

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the

person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a

way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

you may not get it correct.

>

> There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

when the question on is asked.

>

> The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> get the same answer.

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

>

> More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which

is releted with question:

> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP.

if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we

found very correct time.

>

> A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me

that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so

i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

>

> regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> Dear Kanak

> Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test

is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case,

see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should

find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

>

> good luck

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Raichur ji,

>

> I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all

planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0

15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected

with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS

CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon

starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

>

> i am try to give more detail:

> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

>

> Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

>

> bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

sub for selection.

>

> as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

>

> Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

>

> regards

> kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> DEAR Hasmukhrai

> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS

IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of

about 10-15 minutes.

>

> But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

ASC

> is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.

>

> check and let us have the results of your study.

>

> good luck

>

> Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:

> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of

the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must

be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is

this possible?

>

> Good luck and all the best.

>

> Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

>

> First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules

is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.

>

> Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

>

> Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

>

> Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

candidate for 9th sublord.

>

> Look at todays position:

>

>

---------

> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

H. 29 M. 47 S.

> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

>

> --

-------

>

> SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL

DAY MOON - OK)

> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

jup.-OK

> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

>

> That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

right?

> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion

on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this

is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i

suggest only part one.

>

> Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like

story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree

with me.

>

>

> with best regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

> Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

out of hand...

> May I draw your attention to the chapter on

Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> He says " I have observed that in the Star or

Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

transitting at the TOB...

> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....

> And...this rule,also of the late Shri

M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by

you...

> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and

if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> Kindly think about it carefully,

Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka

respectively...

> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> With kind regards,

> L.Y.Rao.

>

>

>

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Vijay ji,

>

> I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

>

> bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN

EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP

BITHER COME SAME.

> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

is MAR.not match.

>

> 03-09-2006 13:52:15

>

> DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

03,09,2006

> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ?

13,52,15

> DAY LORD IS SUN.

> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

>

> ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

Asc. = Birth MOON and

> RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are

in Conj.)

> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

we have two more RP

> MER and JUP.

> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give

more wight to node

> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> Asc for this time is as under:

> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

all are same as RP

> Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

>

> All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

Raichur's software.

>

> Regards

> Kanak

>

> Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

the correct

> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

>

> Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote:

> Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

>

> Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

TOB is not accurately known.

>

> Female

> 18-08-1978

> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> Allahabad (UP)

> 81E51, 25N27

>

> Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

>

> Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

Gemini to Cancer.

>

> It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

>

> Thanks and Regards,

>

> Vijay Kumar

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

Small Business.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version

8. Get it NOW

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> Astrological services par excellence

> http://www.astroclinica.com

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version

8. Get it NOW

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

call rates.

>

>

>

>

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Kankji i close my case on this matter.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement. 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy? 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it

is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement? 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future. 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, . 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord. This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future. Very anxious, Kanak Bosmia Raichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct. There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not get the same answer. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub? More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question: for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time. A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec. regards KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Kanak Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. good luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we

adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt. i am try to give more detail: for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP. Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP. next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH. bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection. as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP. Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ? regards kanakRaichur-a-r

<raichurar > wrote: DEAR Hasmukhrai This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes. But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly. check and let us have the results of your study. good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote: If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible? Good luck and all the best. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Lajimi ji, First i want to

clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE. Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use. Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK. Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord. Look at todays position: --------- DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) --------- SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK) MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK MER:

IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right? I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one. Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont

read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me. with best regards Kanak Bosmia Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Kanak, You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand... May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)... He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB... For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp.... And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you... The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not

seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality... Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively... Well,pl.let me have your opinion... With kind regards, L.Y.Rao. Kanak Bosmia

<kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Vijay ji, I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy. bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME. If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match. 03-09-2006 13:52:15 DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g.

9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006 pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15 DAY LORD IS SUN. ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU

332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN ANOTHER TIME Y/N ? MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under: From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB. 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth

Asc. we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.) MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time. All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software. RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51 > wrote: Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars, Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. Female 18-08-1978 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST Allahabad (UP) 81E51, 25N27 Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi) Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer. It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level. Thanks and Regards, Vijay Kumar Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See

Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I have written a post on KP books on my blog at http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/archives/2004_05_01_archive.html. Please have a look.

 

I would also like to request senior members of this forum to give your suggestion in form of comments, to make this list exhaustive and complete.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 9/7/06, Sonia Kumar <sonia_kumar1002 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am new to this group and want to learn astrology. Please can you recommend some books or websites that i can access and learn from.

thanks in advance

Sonia

Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.

 

 

There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked.

 

The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not

get the same answer.

 

 

Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Raichur ji,

 

If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

 

More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:

for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.

 

 

A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

 

regards

KanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Kanak

Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

 

good luck

Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Raichur ji,

 

I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

 

i am try to give more detail:

for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

 

Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

 

bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection.

 

as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

 

Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

 

regards

kanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

 

 

 

DEAR Hasmukhrai

This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.

 

 

But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC

is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.

 

check and let us have the results of your study.

 

good luckHasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik > wrote:

 

 

 

If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?

 

 

Good luck and all the best.

 

Hasmukhrai J Mehta.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

> wrote:

 

 

Dear Lajimi ji,

 

First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and

I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.

 

Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

 

Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

 

Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.

 

Look at todays position:

 

---------

DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S. Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56) (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34) ---------

 

 

SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)

MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK

SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?

I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.

 

 

Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me.

 

 

with best regards

Kanak Bosmia

Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Kanak,

You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...

May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...

For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....

And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...

The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

 

Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...

Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

With kind regards,

L.Y.Rao.

 

 

 

Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Vijay ji,

 

I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

 

bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.

 

If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.

 

03-09-2006 13:52:15

 

DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006

pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ? TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15

DAY LORD IS SUN.

ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOONRAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SATKETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

From 02.27.05 MAR start start.02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON andRP Moon = Birth Asc.

we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)

MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RPMER and JUP.But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to nodeand select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KETAsc for this time is as under:For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

 

For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

 

 

All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.

 

RegardsKanakRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

 

 

As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correcttime will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka LagnaVijay Kumar <vk_51

> wrote:

 

 

Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

 

Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known.

 

Female

18-08-1978

0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

Allahabad (UP)

81E51, 25N27

 

Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

 

Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.

 

It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Vijay Kumar

 

 

Get your email and more, right on the new .com

 

 

Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

Small Business.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

 

 

All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

 

 

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8.

Get it NOW

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

 

 

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com.

Check it out. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astrocli

nica.com

 

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8.

Get it NOW

 

 

Get your email and more, right on the new .com

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

 

 

Get your email and more, right on the new .com

 

 

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

 

 

All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

 

 

How low will we go? Check out Messenger�s low

PC-to-Phone call rates.

 

 

 

Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls

to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Swami ji, thanks for your view. My comment in bold*************swami omkar <swamiomkar wrote: Dear Twji, I am very much surprised after seeing your posing as well as old postings. if Birth rectification is not having proper rule then there is no use to follow this system! I am not agree with you, if we are not setisfied with birth time rectification

we can go with Horary, so as you sya no use of system is not velid statement. I am following RBT(Rectification of Birth Time) like Birth Asc and Current Moon from past 6 yrs. i feel the method which i follow that is giving amazing results. What is the authantication of your result? and you given reference of rangarajan and kuppu ganapathi.'s postings...based on RBT. i like to tell that ranga and ganapathi are not authoraty of KP system. and any one ready to give authontication and relaiablity of data which they used in thier research? first how they understood the RBT techque that is very importent. in that erlyer posting they only giving the % percentage of result. but not they explained what is the connectivity between ASC and MOON or which techniqe they followed. You mean to

say no one understood RBT techque except you. am i right? Basicaly i don't like the people doing research on the bulk data of horoscope. which kanak also done based on marriage, i like his effort...but without knowing the authantication of data doing research is not that much good.some time it breake the confidence on system which we following. so i request people who doing research they can use thier own data which they getting in thier practice. what is the authantication of data from his own data which they getting in thier practice? if in our prctice we found all correct data then what is the meaning of RBT? why we need RBT?I am try this too. i ask members to provide data but it is 100% true that i got only 10 data and no one can do research with 10 data. Now i request you to provide me 100 data from you own prectice i will do all my work again and dispose

all my old work. Data taken for Research by me for Multiple marriage are all AA rated and All worlds astrologer accepet it with selute then who are we to chalange that data? what is other have all are wrong and what is with us is only right... You told in you posting that diffrent astrologer wil get diffrent asnwer if they used RBT based on RP. i feel this is wrong. if we use RP in right way then it give same result for every one. in my experiance RP gives more result compare to Natal and horary chart.(i am prediction only with RP without using Natal and horary) Ok then teach us right way for RBT and we done one experiment, we memebrs in this group do at one this RP and lets look what heppan.befer two three seniore KP astrologer done this expriment and always found that reselt was deffernt, even we(Raichurji, Kuppuji, me and Tinwin

ji do one experiment about Horary and we got defferance result) Unfortunatly KSK can't able to give more information about RBT in his Readers and his mag. but others after his life time (affter 20yrs) they published the books about RBT. that's not much useful for KP astrologer. becoz in same book they used verious techqune and all failure methodolgy.simple i can tell pls avoid that books. in other forum i already posted how to do RBT based on RP. if people intrested i can also do same and possible i wil give direct demo in CHAT session. I know your intrest on only in chat session whay dont we discuss in group by mail? send your work i will do same at my place and lets try to look about result. if any people intrested then i can Rectifiy the birth for one or 2 charts and explain how it done. i always use RP for

RBT. i never get past events from native. i belive RP 100% so it giving more result to me. Here is Data and please do rectification. Male date of Birth: 25th JUNE 1954 Place of Bierth:Chake Chake-Tanzania Time of Birth: 7.55 am to 8.00 am. i am eagrly waiting for your rectification and mention Asc and MOON position for my checking. Rergards kanaktw853 <tw853 > wrote: Dear All,Let me repeat:Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date,

time and place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind answer to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth records are below:Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level, with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers etc.and also depending the nature of devine science. Regards,twP.S.Msg#4682 of this GroupDear Members,I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study on 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number since

for the present study this appears sufficient.I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if members so suggest.Regards,RangarajanFILE SECTION OF THIS GROUPRectification Study A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification pandeypunit May 28, 2005Study of AA - Records (Final).doc Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27, 2005Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)May 27, 2005Rangarajan Krishnamoorthyranga (AT) mmsindia (DOT) comI have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW. Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take a break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to be sufficient.Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to include the

individual record details in this document. If anyone is interested, I can make it available separately.Here are the latest results.Description(Total No. of Records: 300) Passes FailsCorrect Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)Incorrect (-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time. , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one

pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if

i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same

question, at different times may not > get the same answer. > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.>

> regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is

no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about

10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am

prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> > --> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/-

1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> > > > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF

VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth

cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK

WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 -

MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at

time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to

your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain

Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Satish, Mr.Shanmugham's rule has been found by me,personally,atleast 90% of the times I have taken up the exercise of correcting a B.C.In my personal experience it works fairly well,as observed by verification of past events,which satisfies me...in the rare case whyere it does not,or if the difference is actually very big,then the IXth sublord rule or any of the many other rules like the RP rule etc are applied,selectively... I guess it is patently unfair to the system itself,to expect any "man-made system",to work with 100% efficiency all the time... There is always

scope for improvement,but to rubbish a system or method,because it does not give 100% results ALL the time,therefore is too hasty and unfair a comment,in my humble opinion... If I remember correctly,our revered Guruji KSK had always maintained that if the s/l of astrologer's Ascendant is connected to the VIIIth house of the querant's,the astrologer is more likely to fail in his endeavour to be correct...! I guess more research is called for...before dissmissing one out of the many rules given in the late Shanmugham's book... Well,as Mr.Raichur opines,each one to his own...as per his

own experience... With kind regards, Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Dear Friends,From the research carried out by Kanakbhai,it is clear there is no one accurate method for 'correct'prediction in every case.Among the many systems available in use, KP is positively a simpler system, hence it is becoming more popular.It may offend the fundementalists in KP; a more mature approach would be to have a cross check from one or another system to ensure the confidence.Take for example the fundemntal theory of the sub lord of the Lagna to be the starlord of the Moon. In many cases it does not work out and any correction made to manipulate the Sublord planet results in exaggeratedly different birth times.When you question the querent the

accuracy of recording the birth time it creates more trouble.Arising out this controversey is Khullar's theory of sub-sub lord,which narrows down the search for a 'more' correct birth time.Life events are the final judges.The use of RPs have also not proved beneficial in many cases, because once you include Rahu and Ketu, you end up with more RPs than you desire.Elimination of planets from the scope becomes a problem.I had raised this issue a year ago,whether Rahu aspect is 5,7,9 or anything else.Vedic astrologers like Sanjay Rath also add 12th and 2nd aspect too, if you have heard his audio files.If the members recall, a year ago, aspects and conjunctions were treated as minor significators and hence ignored.Subsequently the concept of orb of 3deg 20sec was introduced.The 4 step theory,was then brought in,as an improvement.Much prominence was not given because the theory was largely restricted

to Marathi speaking audience by Sri Gondhalekar.In a practical mannner, Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate into simple English, the theory.The aspects of Aspects and conjunctions play a very important role along with RPs.Conclusion.I could only conclude from the collective wisdom of the stalwarts of this group, prediction of each and every case is a research in itself.Acceptance of more than one system, is not a reflection on the capabalities of the asrologer.Fortunately we have research minded friends like Kanakbhai,always willing to go the extra mile, results apart. We need to go beyond the "correct"birth time concept.My apologies to any one hurt by my observations.Regards,Satish-- In , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we

are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to

change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you

and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not > get the same answer.

> > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.> > regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r

<raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to

give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is

definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly

falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> > -> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at

22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> > --------------------------------> > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30

ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it

was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be

correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20

Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 -

MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP >

Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could

be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >

> > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me

Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > >

> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.>

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Kanak, Mr.Shanmugham's book explains under the Chapter, "Advanced Stellar Astrology",soon after the chater on A Method to set a correct Lagna by K.P.(using the Xth cusp)...that,Sun,the athmakaraka,(soul),or,Jupiter,(the putrakaraka),or, Venus (the Kama karaka) will always be found transitting the star or sub of the IXth s/l,at the time of birth... ! Thus,Kanak,you could use this method,the Xth cusp method or the RP's method,whichever you may choose,to rectify the TOB... Many methods are made available by Shanmugham,for which we are indebted to him,without

doubt...now it is for the astrologer to choose...the method he is most comfortable with... All that I'm saying is that,thus far,I am more than satisfied with the Ascendant sublord and ss/l appearing as the Moon's star-lord and sub-lord respectively...provided the corrected TOB is within + or _ 20 to 30 minutes... There is,truly no point in debating endlessly which method is 100% correct ALWAYS...we all know that no "formula can ever be 100% correct ALL the time... I guess let us move on and stop this

pointless/endless discussion... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao.Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Swami ji, thanks for your view. My comment in bold*************swami omkar

<swamiomkar (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Twji, I am very much surprised after seeing your posing as well as old postings. if Birth rectification is not having proper rule then there is no use to follow this system! I am not agree with you, if we are not setisfied with birth time rectification we can go with Horary, so as you sya no use of system is not velid statement. I am following RBT(Rectification of Birth Time) like Birth Asc and Current Moon from past 6 yrs. i feel the method which i follow that is giving amazing results. What is the authantication of your result? and you given reference of rangarajan and

kuppu ganapathi.'s postings...based on RBT. i like to tell that ranga and ganapathi are not authoraty of KP system. and any one ready to give authontication and relaiablity of data which they used in thier research? first how they understood the RBT techque that is very importent. in that erlyer posting they only giving the % percentage of result. but not they explained what is the connectivity between ASC and MOON or which techniqe they followed. You mean to say no one understood RBT techque except you. am i right? Basicaly i don't like the people doing research on the bulk data of horoscope. which kanak also done based on marriage, i like his effort...but without knowing the authantication of data doing research is not that much good.some time it breake the confidence on system which we following. so i request people who doing research they can use

thier own data which they getting in thier practice. what is the authantication of data from his own data which they getting in thier practice? if in our prctice we found all correct data then what is the meaning of RBT? why we need RBT?I am try this too. i ask members to provide data but it is 100% true that i got only 10 data and no one can do research with 10 data. Now i request you to provide me 100 data from you own prectice i will do all my work again and dispose all my old work. Data taken for Research by me for Multiple marriage are all AA rated and All worlds astrologer accepet it with selute then who are we to chalange that data? what is other have all are wrong and what is with us is only right... You told in you posting that diffrent astrologer wil get diffrent asnwer if they used RBT based

on RP. i feel this is wrong. if we use RP in right way then it give same result for every one. in my experiance RP gives more result compare to Natal and horary chart.(i am prediction only with RP without using Natal and horary) Ok then teach us right way for RBT and we done one experiment, we memebrs in this group do at one this RP and lets look what heppan.befer two three seniore KP astrologer done this expriment and always found that reselt was deffernt, even we(Raichurji, Kuppuji, me and Tinwin ji do one experiment about Horary and we got defferance result) Unfortunatly KSK can't able to give more information about RBT in his Readers and his mag. but others after his life time (affter 20yrs) they published the books about RBT. that's not much useful for KP astrologer. becoz in same book they used verious techqune and all failure methodolgy.simple i can tell pls avoid that books. in other forum i already posted how to do RBT based on RP. if people intrested i can also do same and possible i wil give direct demo in CHAT session. I know your intrest on only in chat session whay dont we discuss in group by mail? send your work i will do same at my place and lets try to look about result. if any people intrested then i can Rectifiy the birth for one or 2 charts and explain how it done. i always use RP for RBT. i never get past events from native. i belive RP 100% so it giving more result to me. Here is Data and please do rectification. Male date of Birth: 25th JUNE 1954 Place of Bierth:Chake Chake-Tanzania Time of Birth: 7.55 am to 8.00

am. i am eagrly waiting for your rectification and mention Asc and MOON position for my checking. Rergards kanaktw853 <tw853 > wrote: Dear All,Let me repeat:Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time and place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind answer to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth records are below:Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a

reliable technique for rectifying birth time.Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level, with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers etc.and also depending the nature of devine science. Regards,twP.S.Msg#4682 of this GroupDear Members,I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study on 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number since for the present study this appears sufficient.I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if members so suggest.Regards,RangarajanFILE SECTION OF THIS GROUPRectification Study A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification pandeypunit May 28, 2005Study of AA - Records (Final).doc Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27,

2005Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)May 27, 2005Rangarajan Krishnamoorthyranga (AT) mmsindia (DOT) comI have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW. Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take a break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to be sufficient.Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to include the individual record details in this document. If anyone is interested, I can make it available separately.Here are the latest results.Description(Total No. of Records: 300) Passes FailsCorrect Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)Incorrect (-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57

(19%)Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time. , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> >

2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is

not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar

wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not > get the same answer. > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to

cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.> > regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> >

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three

JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that

the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2,

you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> > --> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> > > > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet

be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao

Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let

me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC

JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in

Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc

90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978> 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par

excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's

mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Satish ji, Please read my mail positively there is no other intention in my mind at all, and take my mail as right way.i am never try to write anything to criticize any one personaly.my english is not good and my times people misunderstand me. My coment in bold ************R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Dear Friends,From the research carried out by Kanakbhai,it is clear there is no one accurate method for

'correct'prediction in every case.Among the many systems available in use, KP is positively a simpler system, hence it is becoming more popular.It may offend the fundementalists in KP; a more mature approach would be to have a cross check from one or another system to ensure the confidence. I am not agree with you at this point. KP is only one system, you can rely only this one system . I never use any other system and i got may sucesses using KP only.For your in information i learn many vedic astrology text book like : SHADPANCHASHIKA,TAJIK,MUHURAT MARTAND,BHAVARTH RATNAKAR, LAGHUPARASHARY,BHRUGUSUTRA etc. not only learn but i pass exams with more then 85%. i am also know western as well as i know KP. i read many books and doing many work on it. many artical published in many gujarati magazine too on both vedic and westorn and also on KP too. i strongly belive that with only KP one can pridict with

full confidence and not nedd any other tools for pridiction. I strongly request you to ferget all for some times and look how KP gives you result, and if you fail then it is good lession for you , you will found more learnign tools from your failore.Take for example the fundemntal theory of the sub lord of the Lagna to be the starlord of the Moon. In many cases it does not work out and any correction made to manipulate the Sublord planet results in exaggeratedly different birth times.When you question the querent the accuracy of recording the birth time it creates more trouble. As i mention in my last mail to Raichur ji i never discuss on this Sanmigam's rules. so i am not able to reply . Arising out this controversey is Khullar's theory of sub-sub lord,which narrows down the search for a 'more' correct birth time.Life events

are the final judges. Very first K.Baskaran wrote book name: SECRETS OF R.P. & THE BIRTH TIME by K.Baskaran-Madurai. in 1999. and authore give in detals how to come up to sub-sub of birth Asc. (yes there are many printed error in book as always we found in book published by son of shri KSK. but we have to look only theory not printing mistake.)I follow only as per theory given in this book and found very good result, but as you know no one theory of rectifiction of birth is availbe ib world. if not i am waiitng to know that theory of rectifiction.The use of RPs have also not proved beneficial in many cases, because once you include Rahu and Ketu, you end up with more RPs than you desire.Elimination of planets from the scope becomes a problem.I had raised this issue a year ago,whether Rahu aspect is 5,7,9 or anything else.Vedic astrologers like Sanjay Rath also add 12th and 2nd aspect too,

if you have heard his audio files. If you read this book of K.Baskaran he clearly wrote on page no: 13 7: ............. we must understand that the possibility of having either rahu or ketu as asc sublord is limited only to 11%.Readers are requested not to use nodes, in random as a readly available alternatives." also in many exmple auther give detals why he take nodes and why he not take node in examples in book. I strogly request you to read this book. i think this book publishe in Tamil befor this english edition.If the members recall, a year ago, aspects and conjunctions were treated as minor significators and hence ignored.Subsequently the concept of orb of 3deg 20sec was introduced.The 4 step theory,was then brought in,as an improvement.Much prominence was not given because the theory was largely restricted to Marathi speaking audience by Sri Gondhalekar.In a

practical mannner, Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate into simple English, the theory.The aspects of Aspects and conjunctions play a very important role along with RPs. Yes i agree with you but science is not alwyas fix. in my other mail i give exmple of PLUTO. so i dont repit again, but if we found any good thing and usefull then we use within KP Principle. in my one of mail i mention about Solar return chart with one year mahadasa for indira gandhi's death. but i use pure KP in that exmple but i use solar return chart.there is nothign wrong if we add some more tools for KP.Conclusion.I could only conclude from the collective wisdom of the stalwarts of this group, prediction of each and every case is a research in itself. I am 100% agree with you. Acceptance of more than one system, is not a reflection on the capabalities of the

asrologer.Fortunately we have research minded friends like Kanakbhai,always willing to go the extra mile, results apart. We need to go beyond the "correct"birth time concept. We dont need to improve our confidance with use of other system KP alon give you very good result. A guss that you know about Dymock test. i regularly participt and got 70 & sucess with using only KP. and if you check result other memebrs who give corect answer are change every month and sysytem also change every month.( this is for information only do not take me wrong please. )My apologies to any one hurt by my observations. My observation : improve confidance in KP, you will pridict with confidance without any cross check with other system. regards kanak Regards,Satish-- In , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:>> Dear Raichur ji,> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly fallacy statement.> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement. In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction they are not allways correct, but KP

IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change our statement about accurecy?> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is only last statement?> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in our style and

word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are liable for that in future.> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry if i heart anyonce feelings, .> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine planet conected with MOON star Lord.> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on Sanmugam's Rule in future.> > Very anxious,> Kanak Bosmia> > > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in a way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence, you may not get it correct.> > There is a strong urge, both in the

querent and the astrologer when the question on is asked. > > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at different places, on the same question, at different times may not > get the same answer. > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which is releted with question:> for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in RP. if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking we found very correct time.> > A perosn come to me for consaltation,

during aour talk he told me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.> > regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> Dear Kanak > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct. > > good luck> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Raichur ji,> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet

always conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.> > i am try to give more detail:> for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.> next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three sub for selection.> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?> > regards> kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> DEAR Hasmukhrai> This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE

CHECK ON THE INCIDENTS IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span of about 10-15 minutes.> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of ASC > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.> > check and let us have the results of your study.> > good luck> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik wrote:> If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is this possible?> > Good luck and all the best.> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Lajimi

ji,> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU EXPERIANCE.> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about "Aspect of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be candidate for 9th sublord.> > Look at todays position:> >

-> DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4 H. 29 M. 47 S.> Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.> SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)> MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)> MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer : > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)> MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)> JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)> (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)> >

--------------------------------> > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30 ALL DAY MOON - OK)> MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK> MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK> JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK> VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF jup.-OK> SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK> RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK> KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i right?> I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my opinion on this rules i have to write what i

relay think on this rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i suggest only part one.> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with many members that never accept any thing without checking our self even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book like story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can disagree with me.> > > with best regards> Kanak Bosmia> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule out of hand...> May I draw your attention to the chapter on Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...> He says " I have observed that in the Star or Sub of the

IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found transitting at the TOB...> For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth cusp....> And...this rule,also of the late Shri M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted by you...> The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...> Kindly think about it carefully, Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and Kamakaraka respectively...> Well,pl.let me have your opinion...> With kind regards,> L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:> Dear Vijay ji,> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i prove by maths that this rules is

totaly falcy.> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF RP BITHER COME SAME.> If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord is MAR.not match.> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ? 03,09,2006> pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36> WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?> TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15> DAY LORD IS SUN.> ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN> MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON> RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT> KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?> MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:> From 02.27.05 MAR start start.> 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR

sub .> Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.> 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR> 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH> 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP> 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT> 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER> 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN> 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN> 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO> I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP Asc. = Birth MOON and> RP Moon = Birth Asc.> we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are in Conj.)> MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao we have two more RP> MER and JUP.> But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we give more wight to node> and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET> Asc for this time is as

under:> For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN> For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.> In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON> so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN. all are same as RP > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in Raichur's software.> > Regards> Kanak> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star the correct> time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51 wrote: > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose TOB is not accurately known. > > Female> 18-08-1978>

0300 - 0330 Hrs IST> Allahabad (UP)> 81E51, 25N27> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from Gemini to Cancer.> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.> > Thanks and Regards,> > Vijay Kumar> > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. >

> > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. > > > > > > > Hasmukhrai J Mehta> Astrological services par excellence> http://www.astroclinica.com > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >

> > > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. > > > > > >

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<> > > > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.>>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Swami Omkar ji,

 

No comment on your personal views without belief or reading KP

Readers or other reference books or without peoperly understanding

of what is research, even what is AA rated data.

 

Thanks and regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Swami ji,

>

> thanks for your view.

> My comment in bold*************

>

> swami omkar <swamiomkar wrote:

> Dear Twji,

>

> I am very much surprised after seeing your posing as well as old

postings.

>

> if Birth rectification is not having proper rule then there is

no use to follow this system!

>

> I am not agree with you, if we are not setisfied with birth time

rectification we can go with Horary, so as you sya no use of system

is not velid statement.

>

> I am following RBT(Rectification of Birth Time) like Birth Asc

and Current Moon from past 6 yrs. i feel the method which i follow

that is giving amazing results.

>

> What is the authantication of your result?

>

> and you given reference of rangarajan and kuppu ganapathi.'s

postings...based on RBT.

> i like to tell that ranga and ganapathi are not authoraty of KP

system. and any one ready to give authontication and relaiablity of

data which they used in thier research? first how they understood

the RBT techque that is very importent.

> in that erlyer posting they only giving the % percentage of

result. but not they explained what is the connectivity between ASC

and MOON or which techniqe they followed.

>

> You mean to say no one understood RBT techque except you. am i

right?

>

> Basicaly i don't like the people doing research on the bulk data

of horoscope. which kanak also done based on marriage, i like his

effort...but without knowing the authantication of data doing

research is not that much good.some time it breake the confidence on

system which we following. so i request people who doing research

they can use thier own data which they getting in thier practice.

>

> what is the authantication of data from his own data which they

getting in thier practice? if in our prctice we found all correct

data then what is the meaning of RBT? why we need RBT?I am try this

too. i ask members to provide data but it is 100% true that i got

only 10 data and no one can do research with 10 data.

> Now i request you to provide me 100 data from you own prectice i

will do all my work again and dispose all my old work.

>

> Data taken for Research by me for Multiple marriage are all AA

rated and All worlds astrologer accepet it with selute then who are

we to chalange that data? what is other have all are wrong and what

is with us is only right...

>

> You told in you posting that diffrent astrologer wil get

diffrent asnwer if they used RBT based on RP. i feel this is wrong.

if we use RP in right way then it give same result for every one. in

my experiance RP gives more result compare to Natal and horary chart.

(i am prediction only with RP without using Natal and horary)

>

> Ok then teach us right way for RBT and we done one experiment,

we memebrs in this group do at one this RP and lets look what

heppan.befer two three seniore KP astrologer done this expriment and

always found that reselt was deffernt, even we(Raichurji, Kuppuji,

me and Tinwin ji do one experiment about Horary and we got

defferance result)

>

> Unfortunatly KSK can't able to give more information about RBT

in his Readers and his mag. but others after his life time (affter

20yrs) they published the books about RBT. that's not much useful

for KP astrologer. becoz in same book they used verious techqune and

all failure methodolgy.simple i can tell pls avoid that books.

>

> in other forum i already posted how to do RBT based on RP. if

people intrested i can also do same and possible i wil give direct

demo in CHAT session.

>

> I know your intrest on only in chat session whay dont we discuss

in group by mail? send your work i will do same at my place and lets

try to look about result.

> if any people intrested then i can Rectifiy the birth for one or

2 charts and explain how it done.

>

> i always use RP for RBT. i never get past events from native. i

belive RP 100% so it giving more result to me.

>

> Here is Data and please do rectification.

>

> Male

> date of Birth: 25th JUNE 1954

> Place of Bierth:Chake Chake-Tanzania

> Time of Birth: 7.55 am to 8.00 am.

> i am eagrly waiting for your rectification and mention Asc and

MOON position for my checking.

>

> Rergards

> kanak

>

> tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> Dear All,

>

> Let me repeat:

>

> Firstly, a rectified TOB by mere RPs can not be claimed as correct

> because it may not be the same depending astrologer, date, time

and

> place of casting. (One can see Shri KP Kuppu Ganapathi's kind

answer

> to my blunt question without knowing that is him at that time in

> Msg#5054 of this group and experience of Baskaran and Khake in

> Msg#5028 point 3 & 4)

>

> Secondly, the results of Rangarajan's study on 300 AA-rated birth

> records are below:

>

> Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

> starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

>

> Another point is how can the Horary result be the same for any KP

> astrologer of different kinds like a beginner level, high level,

> with good manner or bad manner, without much faith in KP Readers

etc.

> and also depending the nature of devine science.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> P.S.

>

> Msg#4682 of this Group

>

> Dear Members,

> I have just uploaded a file summarising the results of our study

on

> 300 AA-rated birth records. I decided to stop with this number

since

> for the present study this appears sufficient.

>

> I will be happy to continue the study with other techniques, if

> members so suggest.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

> FILE SECTION OF THIS GROUP

>

> Rectification Study

> A Study of Various Methodologies of Birth Time Rectification

> pandeypunit

> May 28, 2005

>

> Study of AA - Records (Final).doc

> Study of AA -Records (Final) 28 KB ranga_mms May 27,

> 2005

>

> Study of AA-Rated Charts (Final)

> May 27, 2005

> Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy

> ranga

>

> I have been able to process 300 records from the list given by TW.

> Since this is a reasonable number I decided to stop here and take

a

> break. For validating Shanmugham's technique of birth time

> rectification (as we have understood), this experiment appears to

be

> sufficient.

>

> Since the output from my program is quite large, I decided not to

> include the individual record details in this document. If anyone

is

> interested, I can make it available separately.

>

> Here are the latest results.

> Description

> (Total No. of Records: 300) Passes Fails

> Correct Records 247 (82%) 53 (18%)

> Incorrect (-30 min) 252 (84%) 48 (16%)

> Incorrect (-25) 233 (78%) 67 (22%)

> Incorrect (-20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

> Incorrect (-15) 228 (76%) 72 (24%)

> Incorrect (-10) 243 (81%) 57 (19%)

> Incorrect (-5) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

> Incorrect (+5) 245 (82%) 55 (18%)

> Incorrect (+10) 235 (78%) 65 (22%)

> Incorrect (+15) 240 (80%) 60 (20%)

> Incorrect (+20) 239 (80%) 61 (20%)

> Incorrect (+25) 248 (83%) 52 (17%)

> Incorrect (+30) 242 (81%) 58 (19%)

>

> Conclusion: Using the connection between ASC sublord and MOON

> starlord is not a reliable technique for rectifying birth time.

>

> , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at

> deffer place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to

> understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in

> KP but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP

> astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly

> fallacy statement.

> >

> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement.

> In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that

> situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but

we

> all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his

> pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction

> they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY

OTHER

> BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance

> to Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one

> pridict right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to

> change our statement about accurecy?

> >

> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct,

> one time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this

> group and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is

> totaly falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist

new

> comer to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide

newcomer

> on correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen

in

> BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then

> are you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi

> is only last statement?

> >

> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection

> in our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we

are

> liable for that in future.

> >

> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry

> if i heart anyonce feelings, .

> >

> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's

> rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine

> planet conected with MOON star Lord.

> >

> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on

> Sanmugam's Rule in future.

> >

> > Very anxious,

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

> method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when

the

> person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in

a

> way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

> you may not get it correct.

> >

> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

> when the question on is asked.

> >

> > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

> different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> > get the same answer.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

> Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

> >

> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

> ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord

which

> is releted with question:

> > for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

> Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in

RP.

> if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking

we

> found very correct time.

> >

> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told

> me that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was

JUP

> so i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

> >

> > regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak

> > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final

> test is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In

your

> case, see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you

> should find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

> 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs.

all

> planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10

t0

> 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always

> conwected with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK

> FOR 5 DAYS CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection

with

> Moon starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

> >

> > i am try to give more detail:

> > for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

> >

> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> > next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

> >

> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

> sub for selection.

> >

> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

> all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

> >

> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > DEAR Hasmukhrai

> > This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

> is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE

INCIDENTS

> IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

> CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span

> of about 10-15 minutes.

> >

> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

> ASC

> > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or

> indirectly.

> >

> > check and let us have the results of your study.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik@> wrote:

> > If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord

> of the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

> Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours

> must be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24

hours.

> Is this possible?

> >

> > Good luck and all the best.

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

> >

> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

> perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

> starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this

rules

> is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

> SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

> EXPERIANCE.

> >

> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

> of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

> and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

> >

> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

> JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

> IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

> >

> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

> candidate for 9th sublord.

> >

> > Look at todays position:

> >

> > -------------------------

> ----------

> > DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

> H. 29 M. 47 S.

> > Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> > SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> > MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> > MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> > MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> > JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> > (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

> >

> > -------------------------

> --------

> >

> > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

> JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30

ALL

> DAY MOON - OK)

> > MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> > MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> > VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

> jup.-OK

> > SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> > RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> > KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

> >

> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

> them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

> right?

> > I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

> and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my

> opinion on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this

> rules.this is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2

&

> 3. i suggest only part one.

> >

> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

> many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

> even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

> with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book

like

> story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

> way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can

disagree

> with me.

> >

> >

> > with best regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> > You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

> out of hand...

> > May I draw your attention to the chapter on

> Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> > He says " I have observed that in the Star or

> Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

> transitting at the TOB...

> > For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

> time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth

cusp....

> > And...this rule,also of the late Shri

> M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted

> by you...

> > The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

> rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the

> rules,and if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> > Kindly think about it carefully,

> Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and

> Kamakaraka respectively...

> > Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> > With kind regards,

> > L.Y.Rao.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Vijay ji,

> >

> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

> prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

> >

> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

> THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT

HAPPN

> EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF

> RP BITHER COME SAME.

> > If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

> is MAR.not match.

> >

> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15

> >

> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

> 03,09,2006

> > pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> > WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> > TIME:24 HR BASIS not

> AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ? 13,52,15

> > DAY LORD IS SUN.

> > ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> > MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> > KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

> >

> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> > MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> > From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> > 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> > Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> > 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> > 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> > 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> > 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> > 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> > 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> > 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> > 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> > I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

> Asc. = Birth MOON and

> > RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> > we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH

> are in Conj.)

> > MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

> we have two more RP

> > MER and JUP.

> > But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we

> give more wight to node

> > and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > Asc for this time is as under:

> > For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> > For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> > In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> all are same as RP

> > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

> >

> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

> Raichur's software.

> >

> > Regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

> the correct

> > time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

> >

> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51@> wrote:

> > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

> >

> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

> TOB is not accurately known.

> >

> > Female

> > 18-08-1978

> > 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> > Allahabad (UP)

> > 81E51, 25N27

> >

> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

> >

> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

> Gemini to Cancer.

> >

> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards,

> >

> > Vijay Kumar

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

> Small Business.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

> Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

> Version 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> > Astrological services par excellence

> > http://www.astroclinica.com

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

> Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

> Version 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

> call rates.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

>

> Here's a new way to find what you're looking for -

Answers

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>

>

>

>

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

> Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.

Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Daer Kanakbhai,

 

Thank you for your clarifications. If you read carefully my mail, I

have not critised you or your efforts,in fact I am in praise for your

efforts.

 

If you go back a year ago, when Rangarajan was very active,despite

all best attempts the success rate of results never exceeded 80-85 %.

These results were announced by you both. it still a large gap of

over 15% which cannot be ignored.

 

I have already Baskaran's book and also purchase 2 books of

Khullar on cuspal interlinks,which I do refer.

 

Sri Omkar has promised a foolproof method and am waiting with you

all for the delivery.

 

Best wishes.

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- In , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Satish ji,

>

> Please read my mail positively there is no other intention in my

mind at all, and take my mail as right way.i am never try to write

anything to criticize any one personaly.my english is not good and my

times people misunderstand me.

>

> My coment in bold ************

>

> R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:

> Dear Friends,

>

> From the research carried out by Kanakbhai,it is clear

> there is no one accurate method for 'correct'prediction in every

case.

>

> Among the many systems available in use, KP is positively a simpler

> system, hence it is becoming more popular.It may offend the

> fundementalists in KP; a more mature approach would be to have a

> cross check from one or another system to ensure the confidence.

>

> I am not agree with you at this point. KP is only one system, you

can rely only this one system . I never use any other system and i

got may sucesses using KP only.For your in information i learn many

vedic astrology text book like : SHADPANCHASHIKA,TAJIK,MUHURAT

MARTAND,BHAVARTH RATNAKAR, LAGHUPARASHARY,BHRUGUSUTRA etc. not only

learn but i pass exams with more then 85%. i am also know western as

well as i know KP. i read many books and doing many work on it. many

artical published in many gujarati magazine too on both vedic and

westorn and also on KP too. i strongly belive that with only KP one

can pridict with full confidence and not nedd any other tools for

pridiction.

> I strongly request you to ferget all for some times and look how

KP gives you result, and if you fail then it is good lession for

you , you will found more learnign tools from your failore.

>

> Take for example the fundemntal theory of the sub lord of

> the Lagna to be the starlord of the Moon. In many cases it does not

> work out and any correction made to manipulate the Sublord planet

> results in exaggeratedly different birth times.When you question

the

> querent the accuracy of recording the birth time it creates more

> trouble.

> As i mention in my last mail to Raichur ji i never discuss on

this Sanmigam's rules. so i am not able to reply .

>

> Arising out this controversey is Khullar's theory of sub-

> sub lord,which narrows down the search for a 'more' correct birth

> time.Life events are the final judges.

>

> Very first K.Baskaran wrote book name: SECRETS OF R.P. & THE

BIRTH TIME by K.Baskaran-Madurai. in 1999. and authore give in

detals how to come up to sub-sub of birth Asc. (yes there are many

printed error in book as always we found in book published by son of

shri KSK. but we have to look only theory not printing mistake.)I

follow only as per theory given in this book and found very good

result, but as you know no one theory of rectifiction of birth is

availbe ib world. if not i am waiitng to know that theory of

rectifiction.

>

> The use of RPs have also not proved beneficial in many

> cases, because once you include Rahu and Ketu, you end up with more

> RPs than you desire.Elimination of planets from the scope becomes a

> problem.I had raised this issue a year ago,whether Rahu aspect is

> 5,7,9 or anything else.Vedic astrologers like Sanjay Rath also add

> 12th and 2nd aspect too, if you have heard his audio files.

>

> If you read this book of K.Baskaran he clearly wrote on page no:

13 7: ............. we must understand that the possibility of having

either rahu or ketu as asc sublord is limited only to 11%.Readers are

requested not to use nodes, in random as a readly available

alternatives. " also in many exmple auther give detals why he take

nodes and why he not take node in examples in book. I strogly request

you to read this book. i think this book publishe in Tamil befor this

english edition.

>

> If the members recall, a year ago, aspects and

> conjunctions were treated as minor significators and hence

> ignored.Subsequently the concept of orb of 3deg 20sec was

introduced.

> The 4 step theory,was then brought in,as an improvement.Much

> prominence was not given because the theory was largely restricted

to

> Marathi speaking audience by Sri Gondhalekar.In a practical

mannner,

> Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate into simple English, the

> theory.The aspects of Aspects and conjunctions play a very

important

> role along with RPs.

>

> Yes i agree with you but science is not alwyas fix. in my other

mail i give exmple of PLUTO. so i dont repit again, but if we found

any good thing and usefull then we use within KP Principle. in my one

of mail i mention about Solar return chart with one year mahadasa

for indira gandhi's death. but i use pure KP in that exmple but i use

solar return chart.there is nothign wrong if we add some more tools

for KP.

>

> Conclusion.I could only conclude from the collective

> wisdom of the stalwarts of this group, prediction of each and every

> case is a research in itself.

> I am 100% agree with you.

> Acceptance of more than one system, is

> not a reflection on the capabalities of the asrologer.Fortunately

we

> have research minded friends like Kanakbhai,always willing to go

the

> extra mile, results apart. We need to go beyond the " correct " birth

> time concept.

> We dont need to improve our confidance with use of other system

KP alon give you very good result. A guss that you know about Dymock

test. i regularly participt and got 70 & sucess with using only KP.

and if you check result other memebrs who give corect answer are

change every month and sysytem also change every month.( this is for

information only do not take me wrong please. )

>

> My apologies to any one hurt by my observations.

> My observation : improve confidance in KP, you will pridict with

confidance without any cross check with other system.

>

> regards

> kanak

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Satish

>

> -- In , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > !) Why we are try to got same answer, if astrologer are at deffer

> place?.we are doing harmfull work with this rule.we have to

> understand that every persons thinking style are deffer.and not in

KP

> but in any branch of astrology not got same answer. but we KP

> astrologer never think on it.and try to prove it which is totaly

> fallacy statement.

> >

> > 2) same one statement " kP IS 100% " is also Fallacy statement.

> In that time Shri KSK he need this statement bcoz of that

> situation. we are not discuss about Shri KSK's situation etc but we

> all know no one is 100%.every KP astrologer are fail in his

> pridiction as well as Vedic astrologer also fial in his pridiction

> they are not allways correct, but KP IS MORE ACCURET THEN ANY OTHER

> BRANCH OF ASTROLOGY. this statement KP is 100% accuret give chance

to

> Vedic astrologer to attack on KP bcoz failore is 100% no one

pridict

> right every time. dont you think we KP astrologer have to change

our

> statement about accurecy?

> >

> > 3) we have best method of RP and we found many times correct, one

> time we done work on Birth time rectifiction with RP in this group

> and many times i prove with maths that Sanmugam's rules is totaly

> falcy then why we try to agian and agian repitedly insist new comer

> to check with this rules? it is not our duty to guide newcomer on

> correct path? or still we are run on same way which is writen in

> BOOKS?.if you are go on same line and not look at what is KP then

are

> you gain in KP?why dont you not think that writen by our rishi is

> only last statement?

> >

> > 4)I request all memebrs to think on it, we need some corection in

> our style and word we use to prove KP, and if we do not do we are

> liable for that in future.

> >

> > 5) i know may some members take me in wrong way. I am very sorry

> if i heart anyonce feelings, .

> >

> > 6) I agin request you and specialy Lajmi ji to check Sanmugam's

> rules continuesly 3-4 dyas and check, you found allways all nine

> planet conected with MOON star Lord.

> >

> > This is my last mail on this subject.I never discuss on

> Sanmugam's Rule in future.

> >

> > Very anxious,

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > yes. This is a good method. Mr Gondhalekar uses this

> method when he asks us to check RPS, and the connected s/l when the

> person comes to you, and your work on the natal chart . RPS are in

a

> way divine guidance. But when answering some one by corespondence,

> you may not get it correct.

> >

> > There is a strong urge, both in the querent and the astrologer

> when the question on is asked.

> >

> > The only problem with RPS is that 2 KP astrologers working at

> different places, on the same question, at different times may not

> > get the same answer.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > If we have to final by relation sub then whjy we check this

> Sanmigam's rule? why not direct we checck relation sub?

> >

> > More perfect and correct method is: when some one come to us and

> ask any question then wehave to cast RP and check the sublord which

> is releted with question:

> > for example: some one come to us and ask a question about Child

> Birth so we have to checdk 5th SL. this 5th SL will 100% come in

RP.

> if not then adjest it as per RP and without any feerther chacking

we

> found very correct time.

> >

> > A perosn come to me for consaltation, during aour talk he told me

> that he was go to jail for two days., i check his 12th SL was JUP

so

> i adjest his 12th SL as RAH aby adjesting time only - 0.30Sec.

> >

> > regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak

> > Select one nearest to known (but uncertain time). Then final test

> is always to correlate the relation ships, and events. In your

case,

> see your 5th house lords, and your son,s 9th cusp lords. you should

> find a relationship in these, if both the TOBs are correct.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > I am wondering, ok this rules is for agjesting time within 10 to

> 15 Mnt.but as i many times give detials with maths that 24 hrs. all

> planet conected woth Moonn star so when we adjest time within 10 t0

> 15 Mnt. answer is same bcoze we know all nine planet always

conwected

> with starlord of MOON. I STRONGLY REQUEST YOU TO CHECK FOR 5 DAYS

> CONTUNUESLY you will found all nine planet conection with Moon

> starlord.so ther is no question of 10 to 15 mnt.

> >

> > i am try to give more detail:

> > for exmple MOON is in the star of JUP.

> >

> > Now givan time is 4.15 and Asc sublord is JUP.

> > next sub is SAT and befer JUP sub is RAH.

> >

> > bcoze we have to check within 10 to 15 mnt so we have only three

> sub for selection.

> >

> > as per me all nine planet always conected with moon star lord so

> all three JUP,SAT,RAH are conected with Moon star lord JUP.

> >

> > Now please gide me how to slect one within this three ?

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > DEAR Hasmukhrai

> > This is one rule, of the many for Birth Rectification, where TOB

> is to be corrected. The FINAL ANALYSIS IS THE CHECK ON THE

INCIDENTS

> IN LIFE, OR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHILDREN WHOSE TOB IS KNOWN TO BE

> CORRECT. The correction by this method is valid only within a span

of

> about 10-15 minutes.

> >

> > But, where the time is definite, you will find the SUB LORD of

> ASC

> > is cannected to the starlord of the moon, directly, or indirectly.

> >

> > check and let us have the results of your study.

> >

> > good luck

> >

> > Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinik@> wrote:

> > If the sub-lord of the Ascendant has to be the star-lord of

> the Moon to prove that the time of birth is correct, then the

> Ascendant sub-lord of all the natives born within about 24 hours

must

> be the same. Because Moon remains in a star for about 24 hours. Is

> this possible?

> >

> > Good luck and all the best.

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta.

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote: Dear Lajimi ji,

> >

> > First i want to clear that i am not gainst P.M.Sanmugam

> perosnaly, i am aginst only rules: Asc. SL conection with Moon

> starlord only. and i am prove many times with maths that this rules

> is totaly falcy.and I REQUEST YOU TO CHECK AS I GIVEN MATHS YOUR

> SELF YOU FOUND I AM VERY CORRECT..AND THEN REPLY ABOUT YOU

EXPERIANCE.

> >

> > Regarding other rules of Sanmugan's i salute him about " Aspect

> of Outerplanet and inner planet " and i many times write in grouop

> and i personaly use regularly in my daily use.

> >

> > Regarding Astrosceret part 2, you have mantion rules on SUN-VEN-

> JUP is writen by Late Sri Kudanthai Nathan-Srilanka not by snmugam

> IF THERE IS NO PRINT MISTKE IN BOOK.

> >

> > Now as per Rules planet in star or sub in SUN-VEN-JUP will be

> candidate for 9th sublord.

> >

> > Look at todays position:

> >

> > -------------------------

> ---------

> > DATE WEDNESDAY 6 9 2006 5.30 am I.S.T.SID TIME AT 5.30 LT= 4

> H. 29 M. 47 S.

> > Time show is for sub ending +/- 1 min.

> > SUN. 5 19 25 14 Sun Ven Rah : ends at 22:35)

> > MOON 10 24 18 11 Sat Mar Rah : ends at 08:24)

> > MOON 1 11 1 46 37 Sat Mar Mer :

> > MARS 6 4 44 21 Mer Sun Sat : ends at 19:20)

> > MERC 5 23 52 0 Sun Ven Sat : ends at 07:14)

> > JUP. 7 20 17 30 Ven Jup Jup : NO END

> > VEN. 5 5 49 13 Sun Ket Rah : NO END

> > SAT. 4 24 41 44 Moo Mer Rah : NO END

> > RAHU -R 12 2 0 9 Jup Jup Rah : NO end

> > KETU -R 6 2 0 9 Mer Sun Jup : NO end

> > URAN -R 11 18 51 24 Sat Rah Moo : NO end

> > NEPT -R 10 23 53 31 Sat Mar Mar : NO end

> > MOON:(Mar-Jup 11:18)(Mar-Sat 14:40)(Mar-Mer 17:41)(Mar-Ket 18:56)

> > (Mar-Ven 22:30)(Mar-Sun 23:34)(Mar-Moo 25:21)(Rah-Rah 28:34)

> >

> > -------------------------

> -------

> >

> > SUN- IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > MOON: MOON CHANGE SUB IN SHOR DURATION SO HE COME IN SUB OF VEN-

> JUP-SUN-RAHU-KETU-( AROUND 5:30 pm SUN ASPECT MOON.SO AFTER 5:30

ALL

> DAY MOON - OK)

> > MAR:IN THE STAR OF SUN- OK

> > MER: IN THE STAR OF VEN - OK

> > JUP- IN THE STAR AND SUB OG JUP. - OK

> > VEN: IN THE STAR OF KETU AGENT OF SUN. AND SUB OF rah AGENT OF

> jup.-OK

> > SAT: IN THE SUB OF RAH AGENT OF JUP.-OK

> > RAH:IN THE STAR OF JUP.-OK

> > KET: IN THE STAR OF SUN. - OK

> >

> > That means all 9 planet be a 9th sub then how to select one of

> them? I request all memebrs to check agian and agian and look am i

> right?

> > I have check this rules when i read book but i found falcy rule

> and t i dont want to discuss this but when you specily ask my

opinion

> on this rules i have to write what i relay think on this rules.this

> is the reson i never suggest any one astrosecret part 2 & 3. i

> suggest only part one.

> >

> > Lajimi ji many time i write in group and also talk on phone with

> many members that never accept any thing without checking our self

> even it was writen by any one( i repit any one).and dont read book

> with deep impression of authore, also never read astrology book

like

> story book.if you wnat to understand any method properly and right

> way.this is my personal thinking and i dont mind if one can

disagree

> with me.

> >

> >

> > with best regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> > Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> > You seem to dismiss the late Shanmugham's rule

> out of hand...

> > May I draw your attention to the chapter on

> Advanced Stellar Astrology in his book(part II)...

> > He says " I have observed that in the Star or

> Sub of the IXth sublord,Sun or Jup or Venus has been found

> transitting at the TOB...

> > For the time taken by you,Kanak,as the correct

> time Venus some distance away from being exactly on the IXth

cusp....

> > And...this rule,also of the late Shri

> M.P.Shanmugham has been proved to be correct,in the example quoted

by

> you...

> > The late Mr.M.P.Shanmugham has given many

> rules..it does not seem to be fair to apply only one of the

rules,and

> if it fails,condemn the theory in totality...

> > Kindly think about it carefully,

> Kanak,Sun,Jupiter and Venus are Atmakaraka,Putrakaraka and

Kamakaraka

> respectively...

> > Well,pl.let me have your opinion...

> > With kind regards,

> > L.Y.Rao.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Vijay ji,

> >

> > I dont belive in Sanmugam's Rule. many time in this group i

> prove by maths that this rules is totaly falcy.

> >

> > bellow is my clculation as per K.Baskarn's Book.I WANT TO CLEAR

> THAT TIME BY ME AND RAICHURJI ARE MOSTLY SAME BUT THIS IS NOT HAPPN

> EVERY TIME THAT IF WE CHECK WITH SANMUGAM'S RULES AND WITH HELP OF

RP

> BITHER COME SAME.

> > If we check time 03.20 Asc. SL is MOON and Birth MOON star lord

> is MAR.not match.

> >

> > 03-09-2006 13:52:15

> >

> > DATE DD,MM,YYYY e.g. 9,2,1997 ?

> 03,09,2006

> > pLACE: l.g.hOSPITAL-aHMEDABAD 23 n 00 ,, 72 e 36

> > WANT GULBURGA METHOD Y/N ?

> > TIME:24 HR BASIS not AM/PM,Hr,Mi.Sec ?

> 13,52,15

> > DAY LORD IS SUN.

> > ASC= 237 3 40 MARS MERC JUP VEN

> > MOON/CHANDRA 256 14 7 JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > RAHU 332 8 35 JUP JUP RAHU SAT

> > KETU 152 8 35 MERC SUN JUP VEN

> >

> > ANOTHER TIME Y/N ?

> > MOON TRANSIT ON 18/08/1978 ALLHABAD. As under:

> > From 02.27.05 MAR start start.

> > 02.27.05 to 03.41.25 MAR satar and MAR sub .

> > Our time is suring this SUB so we check SUB-PSUB for this SUB.

> > 02.27.05 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MAR

> > 03.41.25 TO 02.31.25 - MAR-MAR-RAH

> > 02.31.25 TO 02.52.28 - MAR-MAR-JUP

> > 02.52.28 TO 03.04.15 - MAR-MAR-SAT

> > 03.04.15 TO 03.14.47 - MAR-MAR-MER

> > 03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > 03.19.17 TO 03.31.59 - MAR-MAR-VEN

> > 03.31.59 TO 03.35.14 - MAR-MAR-SUN

> > 03.35.14 TO 03.41.25 - MAR-MAR-MOO

> > I allwyas prefer to use rules given in K.Baskaran's rules: RP

> Asc. = Birth MOON and

> > RP Moon = Birth Asc.

> > we have in RP Asc. MARS MERC JUP VEN ( MAR-VEN andf RAH are

> in Conj.)

> > MAR is as Starlord of birth MOON.agian MER sub(Agent of VEN)sao

> we have two more RP

> > MER and JUP.

> > But KETU aspected by JUP and MAR and both are in our RP. so we

give

> more wight to node

> > and select sub-sub as KET.03.14.47 TO 03.19.17 - MAR-MAR-KET

> > Asc for this time is as under:

> > For 03.14.47 : 02.29.24.07 - MER-JUP-SUN-VEN

> > For 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> > In RP Moon we have JUP VEN MOON MOON

> > so if we look at time 03.19.17 : 03.00.22.50 - MOO-JUP-MOO-VEN.

> all are same as RP

> > Moon. and i suggest to take this time is as right birth time.

> >

> > All caculation done on KPAstro2.5 with KPNA. and RP calculted in

> Raichur's software.

> >

> > Regards

> > Kanak

> >

> > Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > As per criterion of ASC sub lord should be same as Moon,star

> the correct

> > time will be 3,20 :asc 90,33,21 i,e Cancer or Karka Lagna

> >

> > Vijay Kumar <vk_51@> wrote:

> > Dear Mr. Rao, Raichur, Kanak and other learned scholars,

> >

> > Please help me to fix the Lagna of the following native, whose

> TOB is not accurately known.

> >

> > Female

> > 18-08-1978

> > 0300 - 0330 Hrs IST

> > Allahabad (UP)

> > 81E51, 25N27

> >

> > Star : Dhanshta-I (Capricorn Rasi)

> >

> > Within the span of 0300 to 0330 Hrs IST, the Lagna transits from

> Gemini to Cancer.

> >

> > It would be obligatory, if the Lagna could be fixed to Sub level.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards,

> >

> > Vijay Kumar

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help.

> Small Business.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version

> 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hasmukhrai J Mehta

> > Astrological services par excellence

> > http://www.astroclinica.com

> >

> > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version

> 8. Get it NOW

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > Get your email and more, right on the new .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> > All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get

> things done faster.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

> call rates.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

> >

> >

> >

> > Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

> All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things

done faster.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...