SEMINAR DATED 19-09.-2004:BHUSHANPRIYA

[Guest guest]

Dear Members,

-ve discussion will give rise to -ve only. I suggest

to close all -ve generating chapters be closed

forthwith and move in +ve direction.

Thanks,

M.R.GUPTA

--- bhooshanpriya <bhooshanpriya wrote:

 

>

>

>

> Dear Mudit jee ,

>

> You have said :

>

> " Kisi member ne yeh bhi kaha hey ki aur experts ko

> kyon nahin bulaya

> gaya to vo meharbaan jara us file ko pad dekheyn jo

> unhey di gai thi

> ki us par kya likha hua hey? agar nahin to main

> batata hoon ki yeh

> Seminar sirf members ke liye hi tha sirf

> ekka-dukka merey

> mehmaano ko chod kar. "

>

> I have just now checked the folder , it says in

> large bold letters :

> '1st All India Lal Kitab Jyotish Seminar'

>

> The seal in the center says :

>

> All India Lal Kitab Forum New Delhi

>

> Yes , within brackets it says : Lal Kitab

> group

> Doesn't say 'sirf members ke liye { for

> members only}

>

> I feel that instead of calling it an all India

> seminar it would have

> been better if you had called it a get together of

>

> members in and around Delhi.

>

>

> ab baat " bandar ke haath mein talwar pakrane ki " ,

> is group ke log

> intne bandar bhi nahi hain jitna aap samajhh rahe

> hain. Agar aap ko

> yeh galat fahami hai ki gyan aap tak seemit hai to

> ismein mein kya

> kah sakti hun.

>

> sincerely,

>

> priya

>

lalkitab , " Mudit982001 "

> <mudit982001>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear all members,

> > First of all i thank all those who have tried to

> understand my

> > intentions behind organising the seminar. All

> those who attended

> the

> > seminar are witness that the only purpose was to

> do some service

> to

> > this graet book. I have gained a lot through this

> book and it was

> a

> > small effort to repay something.

> > I am thankful to this group and Shri Punit in

> particular that they

> > lend me the opportunity to do some humble service.

> Punit ji i must

> > say your doubts are unfounded, You were made the

> chief guest for

> the

> > occasion and the seminar started three hours late

> because we

> > continued to wait for you. I personally tried to

> contact on your

> > mobile number so many times but your mobile was

> switched off. But

> one

> > day earlier you had given your confirmation to

> attend the seminar

> to

> > me on phone. About the seminar events i needn't

> say much as the

> > members who attended have clearly listed them and

> also the fact

> that

> > the material distributed had Lalkitab

> inscribed on it

> and

> > the certificates were also from your side.

> > But i am terribly pained at the recent

> developments at the group

> > questioning my very motives. I promise to leave

> astrology even if

> one

> > of the allegations levelled against me is

> substainted in any way.

> > Regarding Lalkitab course the request came from

> the group, I only

> > responded. I agree with Bhushan Priya that

> learning astrology is

> not

> > that easy by itself, myself, lalkitabee and

> prabhakar tried to

> > formulate some kind of guidelines for the

> aspirants. As you say

> that

> > you have problems inspite of putting in two years

> labour, the same

> > was the case with kulbir but once he got the

> guidelines from me ,

> > prabhakr and lalkitabee he started picking up

> fast. We were only

> > trying to repeat this experiment with all those

> who desire to

> learn.

> > I again challenge anyone to prove any material

> motive behind the

> > seminar event or this teaching course.

> > But Punit I didn't expect that from you. i still

> can't understand

> > what you mean things being done at your back to

> benefit a few. How

> do

> > you say that YOUR group was misused. For your kind

> information I

> too

> > have contributed in grooming this group. Kindly

> check the previous

> > messages and you will get the clear picture. This

> group is not

> your

> > sole property; Rajinder Bhatia, Upadhyia,

> Lalkitabee, Prabhakar,

> > Khattar and many others have contributed a lot in

> making this

> group a

> > success. There is no poi