Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2001 Hare Rama Krishna, Pranam GuruDeva, I am Blood Group A, Rh (-). My Rashi Lagna is Gemini and Navamsa Lagna is Pisces. Moon is in Sag(7th House), Mars in Taurus(12th House). Thanks, Rema --- Sanjay Rath <srath wrote: > OM GURAVE NAMAH > Dear Anton, > Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried > some research into this > as this is not specifically mentioned in the > Shastra. Meena Lagna generally > gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - > I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to > the two night and day > signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This > will require rel > research with each member contributing three items: > a) Blood Group b) Lagna > c) Moon & Mars position. > Best Wishes > Sanjay Rath > - > Anton Kuznetsov <tony > <varahamihira > > Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:40 AM > [sri Guru] Blood group > > > > Jaya Jagannatha! > > > > Dear friends, > > > > one person wrote me, that Jyotish can indicate > the blood group of a > native. > > Do you know anything about this? > > > > Namaste! > > > > --- > > Anton Kuznetsov > > Donetsk, Ukraine > > Jaya Guru Deva > > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > Archive: varahamihira > > Info: > varahamihira/info.html > > > > > > > > ===== Rema Menon Photos - Share your holiday photos online! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2001 > OM GURAVE NAMAH > Dear Anton, > Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried some research into > this as this is not specifically mentioned in the Shastra. Meena Lagna > generally gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - > I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to the two night and day > signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This will require rel > research with each member contributing three items: a) Blood Group b) > Lagna c) Moon & Mars position. > Best Wishes > Sanjay Rath Jaya Jagannatha! Dear Guru Sanjay, My Blood group is 0 Rh - lagna is Taurus Moon is in 12th house Aries Mars is in 7th house Scorpio Mayapur das Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 3, 2001 Hare Krishna. All glories to Sri Sri Guru & Gauranga. My blood group is Rh O +. I have Chandra and lagna in Vrishaba; Kuja in Meena. Regards, Luis. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 3, 2001 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Guru Sanjay Rath Namaste My blood group is B+ Leo Lagna Moon in 7th house Aquarius Mars in 12th house Cancer Navamsa lagna Taurus Regards Wong Kai Cheong > " Sanjay Rath " <srath >varahamihira ><varahamihira > >Re: [sri Guru] Blood group >Tue, 2 Jan 2001 22:36:52 -0800 > >OM GURAVE NAMAH >Dear Anton, >Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried some research into this >as this is not specifically mentioned in the Shastra. Meena Lagna generally >gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - >I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to the two night and day >signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This will require rel >research with each member contributing three items: a) Blood Group b) Lagna >c) Moon & Mars position. >Best Wishes >Sanjay Rath _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 3, 2001 OM GURAVE NAMAH Dear Anton, Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried some research into this as this is not specifically mentioned in the Shastra. Meena Lagna generally gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to the two night and day signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This will require rel research with each member contributing three items: a) Blood Group b) Lagna c) Moon & Mars position. Best Wishes Sanjay Rath - Anton Kuznetsov <tony <varahamihira > Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:40 AM [sri Guru] Blood group > Jaya Jagannatha! > > Dear friends, > > one person wrote me, that Jyotish can indicate the blood group of a native. > Do you know anything about this? > > Namaste! > > --- > Anton Kuznetsov > Donetsk, Ukraine > Jaya Guru Deva > > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 3, 2001 Namaste Guruji, Please find enclosed the blood group data: Name Group Lagna Chandra Mangala ===== ======= ======= ========== ======= Vahe IV Rh+ Vrischika Vrischika (1st) Karka (9th) Wednesday, January 03, 2001, 10:36:52 AM, you wrote: SR> OM GURAVE NAMAH SR> Dear Anton, SR> Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried some research into this SR> as this is not specifically mentioned in the Shastra. Meena Lagna generally SR> gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - SR> I thought that the two groups A B can belong to the two night and day SR> signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This will require rel SR> research with each member contributing three items: a) Blood Group b) Lagna SR> c) Moon Mars position. SR> Best Wishes SR> Sanjay Rath SR> - SR> Anton Kuznetsov <tony SR> <varahamihira > SR> Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:40 AM SR> [sri Guru] Blood group >> Jaya Jagannatha! >> >> Dear friends, >> >> one person wrote me, that Jyotish can indicate the blood group of a SR> native. >> Do you know anything about this? >> >> Namaste! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 4, 2001 OM GURAVE NAMAHDear Vijaya, There are some nice points you mention and the replies are under the questions: Best WishesSanjay Rath - Pingali Vijaya Kumara Lakshmi Narayana Rao <pvklnrao <varahamihira > Wednesday, January 03, 2001 1:38 AM [sri Guru] Blood group > Pranam Sanjay,> > Is not blood group inherited in some way? Is considering Rasi sufficient > for research in such things?> Should not we consider D-12?Rath: The blood group or blood is a physical or material medium connecting us to our parents and other ancestors. Long time back Darwin said that "All human beings are the descendant of apes/ monkeys" and especially the Rhesus monkey was identified as the ancestral stream. This was tested and later it was learnt that only "some human beings come from monkeys and others don't! Thus, the theory of evolution suffered a setback. people like me who are RH -ve implying Rhesus factor absent display blood traits that do not indicate coming from monkeys! Now coming to the interesting part of your question, we are the physical products of our parents and for this the physical body is the focus at present. The D-12 only shows the environmental influence of parents and other peers on us. Thus only Rasi chart is to be considered. > Also, while the members are giving their data, it is unnessasary to post > to the email list. It suffies to post directly to the one who> requested for data. (Here it is Sanjay - As Sanjay is currently > extreemly busy, I volunteer to collect this data). After recieving from > all the members, the person who requested for data can present the whole > data in a single mail to the list. Then every body> on the list may start the research together.> > I have also created a data base in Varahamihira egroup for putting these > details.> Hope every one co-operates. Please note that my intention is guenuine > and I personally do not mind even if every one mails thier data to the > list directly. But, it is not really needed.Rath: Narayana (Vijaya) is right. Please everybody go to the link and fill it up. Let us restart the great work that Maharishi Brighu had done so many ages back.> Regards,> Narayana Rao.> > Sanjay Rath wrote:> > > OM GURAVE NAMAH> > Dear Anton,> > Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried some research into > > this> > as this is not specifically mentioned in the Shastra. Meena Lagna > > generally> > gives A Negative i.e Group A RH -> > I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to the two night and day> > signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This will require rel> > research with each member contributing three items: a) Blood Group b) > > Lagna> > c) Moon & Mars position.> > Best Wishes> > Sanjay Rath> > > OM TAT SAT> Archive: varahamihira> Info: varahamihira/info.html> > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 4, 2001 OM GURAVE NAMAH Dear Rema, Did you realise that you could make a reputation or big name in some particlular area of work as the Moon is in the seventh house in your chart? This will happen towards the latter part of life. Now, what can this be and what do you have to do to achieve this? Having decided this then, plan the NEW YEAR RESOLUTIONS for this year.. Best Wishes Sanjay Rath - Rema Menon <remamenon <varahamihira > Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:24 AM Re: [sri Guru] Blood group > Hare Rama Krishna, > Pranam GuruDeva, > > I am Blood Group A, Rh (-). > My Rashi Lagna is Gemini and Navamsa Lagna is Pisces. > Moon is in Sag(7th House), Mars in Taurus(12th House). > > Thanks, > Rema > --- Sanjay Rath <srath wrote: > > OM GURAVE NAMAH > > Dear Anton, > > Some kind of a study is required into this. I tried > > some research into this > > as this is not specifically mentioned in the > > Shastra. Meena Lagna generally > > gives A Negative i.e Group A RH - > > I thought that the two groups A & B can belong to > > the two night and day > > signs or to the Sun / saturn group pf planets. This > > will require rel > > research with each member contributing three items: > > a) Blood Group b) Lagna > > c) Moon & Mars position. > > Best Wishes > > Sanjay Rath > > - > > Anton Kuznetsov <tony > > <varahamihira > > > Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:40 AM > > [sri Guru] Blood group > > > > > > > Jaya Jagannatha! > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > one person wrote me, that Jyotish can indicate > > the blood group of a > > native. > > > Do you know anything about this? > > > > > > Namaste! > > > > > > --- > > > Anton Kuznetsov > > > Donetsk, Ukraine > > > Jaya Guru Deva > > > > > > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > Archive: varahamihira > > > Info: > > varahamihira/info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===== > Rema Menon > > > > Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 4, 2001 Pranam Sanjay, I agree that blood groups is a physical phenomina. But, still I am un-comfrotable. There are thousands of people with same Rasi chart. And blood group is very much independent on parents groups. It is too much to expect similiar combination in horoscopes of all children. For exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs wold have O groups. Expecting same combination for all of them would be a little too much. How ever, as we need some starting point, taking Rasi is quite understood. As per D-12 showing only environmental influence, I have a little problem. What about orphans? They do have parents. Can we not tell about their parents astrologically using D-12? How ever, incase of orphans, parents do not have any environmental influence. Here, orphans stand for not only those who were abandanded by parents but also those who lost parents when they are infants. your sishya, Vijay. Sanjay Rath wrote: > > Pranam Sanjay, > > > > Is not blood group inherited in some way? Is considering Rasi > sufficient > > for research in such things? > > Should not we consider D-12? > Rath: The blood group or blood is a physical or material medium > connecting us to our parents and other ancestors. Long time back > Darwin said that " All human beings are the descendant of apes/ > monkeys " and especially the Rhesus monkey was identified as the > ancestral stream. This was tested and later it was learnt that only > " some human beings come from monkeys and others don't! Thus, the > theory of evolution suffered a setback. people like me who are RH -ve > implying Rhesus factor absent display blood traits that do not > indicate coming from monkeys! > > > > Now coming to the interesting part of your question, we are the > physical products of our parents and for this the physical body is the > focus at present. The D-12 only shows the environmental influence of > parents and other peers on us. Thus only Rasi chart is to be considered. > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 4, 2001 Dear Vijay , Namaste , [ For exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs wold have O groups. ] I disagree with you here . Both the father of our children and I are O+ . My first son is born with a rare AB - When we traced it , it was his grandmother who had AB+ Best regards , Swee > Pranam Sanjay, > > I agree that blood groups is a physical phenomina. But, still I am > un-comfrotable. There are thousands of people with same Rasi chart. And > blood group is very much independent on parents groups. It is too much > to expect similiar combination in horoscopes of all children. For > exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs wold have O > groups. Expecting same combination for all of them would be a little too > much. > > How ever, as we need some starting point, taking Rasi is quite understood. > > As per D-12 showing only environmental influence, I have a little > problem. What about orphans? They do have parents. Can we not tell about > their parents astrologically using D-12? How ever, incase of orphans, > parents do not have any environmental influence. Here, orphans stand for > not only those who were abandanded by parents but also those who lost > parents when they are infants. > > your sishya, > Vijay. > Sanjay Rath wrote: > > > > Pranam Sanjay, > > > > > > Is not blood group inherited in some way? Is considering Rasi > > sufficient > > > for research in such things? > > > Should not we consider D-12? > > Rath: The blood group or blood is a physical or material medium > > connecting us to our parents and other ancestors. Long time back > > Darwin said that " All human beings are the descendant of apes/ > > monkeys " and especially the Rhesus monkey was identified as the > > ancestral stream. This was tested and later it was learnt that only > > " some human beings come from monkeys and others don't! Thus, the > > theory of evolution suffered a setback. people like me who are RH -ve > > implying Rhesus factor absent display blood traits that do not > > indicate coming from monkeys! > > > > > > > > Now coming to the interesting part of your question, we are the > > physical products of our parents and for this the physical body is the > > focus at present. The D-12 only shows the environmental influence of > > parents and other peers on us. Thus only Rasi chart is to be considered. > > > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 5, 2001 Dear Ajit , Namsate , Yes , tested and re tested . Traced to paternal grandmother . He has to wear a tag . Will be an interesting one in trillionth chance... the other 2 are O groups . Best regards , Swee - " Ajit Krishnan " <ajit <varahamihira > Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:25 PM Re: [sri Guru] Blood group > OM namo narayanaya > > Dear Swee, > > Swee Chan wrote: > <snipped> > > > > > Dear Vijay , > > Namaste , > > > > [ For exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs wold have > > O groups. ] > > > > I disagree with you here . Both the father of our children and I are O+ .. > > My first son is born with a rare AB - > > When we traced it , it was his grandmother who had AB+ > > According to every biology class I've taken, this is impossible. (This > does not mean what you say is not true...). My roomate who is majoring > in genetics says he has never heard of this. > > According to genetics, neither parent of a child with blood type AB can > have blood type O. Blood types of children are based solely on the blood > types of parents...it cannot be traced back to the blood type of the > grandparents. > > If this is really true, it is a one in a trillion occurence. Have you had > all your blood types retested? > > > ajit > > -- > Ajit Krishnan > ajit@(julian|csd|engga).uwo.ca > http://publish.uwo.ca/~akrishna > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 5, 2001 Dear Swee Chan, There are only 3 logical conclusions: 1. My (and some others) understanding of genetics is in-complete or in-accurate 2. Genetic knoledge today scientists have is in-complete or in-accurate 3. The child you are talking about is either of adopted or some similiar kind (this kind of things happen very often in movies but seldom in real life :-) What we can do now: 1. Firstly, I do not see much point in why we should bother. We are not going to use our genetical knowledge in astrology. So, there is no need to find out reason for this. 2. Some investigation at the hospital where birth of your child is believed to occur can prove or dis-prove point number 3 above. But, before that asking some doctor about if it is possible will either prove or dis-prove point number one above. If after asking a doctor and equiry is over, we can conclude that point 2 above is true. And your case would enterest scientists for sure. 3. If you have conception time, we can try to see kind of birth and if replacement of child after birth with out parents notice is possible. How ever, PLEASE NOTE THAT, CURRENT DAY KNOWLEDGE OF GENETIC SCIENCE MAY BE IN_ACCURATE. Sceince evovle with observation. As Sanjay wrote in another mail, Darwin's theory was accepted first, but then some questions are still open! Do not get worried. I am writing this mail from a open mind. Regards, Vijay. Swee Chan wrote: > Dear Vijay , > Namaste , > > [ For exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs > wold have > O groups. ] > > I disagree with you here . Both the father of our children and I are O+ . > My first son is born with a rare AB - > When we traced it , it was his grandmother who had AB+ > > Best regards , > > Swee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 5, 2001 OM GURAVE NAMAH Dear Visti, I am yet to get an answer to the Navamsa attempt you made. Now, try to think.. if the entire world can be divided into " EIGHT BLOOD GROUP VARIABLE of A+, A-, B+,B-, O+,O-,AB+,AB- " then the number of variables necessary for a Jyotish to map this should be 4 (A,B,O,AB) multipled by 2 (+/-). This level of approximation used in blood groups should be sufficient in the Rasi Chart consideration where we consider Lagna, Moon & Mars as these are the significators of Body, Blood and Marrow respectively. I agree that this may sound vague as the same person born within two hours will have similar placement, but then this is the way TO START. Let us start and then we shall go into other details. There is little you know about Ardha-Nadi Amsa, the real genetic code, so let it be. Best Wishes Sanjay Rath - Visti Larsen <vlarsen <varahamihira > Thursday, January 04, 2001 4:37 AM Sv: [sri Guru] Blood group Om Krishna Guru Dear list, Namaste. Is it adequate to state that people born within the same 2 hours range with same Moon and Mars signs have the same blood type? Luckily we aren't considering genetics..*laughs* Best wishes, Visti. - Pingali Vijaya Kumara Lakshmi Narayana Rao varahamihira Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:31 PM Re: [sri Guru] Blood group Pranam Sanjay, I agree that blood groups is a physical phenomina. But, still I am un-comfrotable. There are thousands of people with same Rasi chart. And blood group is very much independent on parents groups. It is too much to expect similiar combination in horoscopes of all children. For exmaple, if two O group persons marry, then all their childs wold have O groups. Expecting same combination for all of them would be a little too much. How ever, as we need some starting point, taking Rasi is quite understood. As per D-12 showing only environmental influence, I have a little problem. What about orphans? They do have parents. Can we not tell about their parents astrologically using D-12? How ever, incase of orphans, parents do not have any environmental influence. Here, orphans stand for not only those who were abandanded by parents but also those who lost parents when they are infants. your sishya, Vijay. Sanjay Rath wrote: > > Pranam Sanjay, > > > > Is not blood group inherited in some way? Is considering Rasi > sufficient > > for research in such things? > > Should not we consider D-12? > Rath: The blood group or blood is a physical or material medium > connecting us to our parents and other ancestors. Long time back > Darwin said that " All human beings are the descendant of apes/ > monkeys " and especially the Rhesus monkey was identified as the > ancestral stream. This was tested and later it was learnt that only > " some human beings come from monkeys and others don't! Thus, the > theory of evolution suffered a setback. people like me who are RH -ve > implying Rhesus factor absent display blood traits that do not > indicate coming from monkeys! > > > > Now coming to the interesting part of your question, we are the > physical products of our parents and for this the physical body is the > focus at present. The D-12 only shows the environmental influence of > parents and other peers on us. Thus only Rasi chart is to be considered. > eGroups Sponsor OM TAT SAT Archive: varahamihira Info: varahamihira/info.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 29, 2008 hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can prideict blood group by horosocp guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important , if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than natiiv has b+ blood group, mangal and budha combinationed than o+ budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+ mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+ and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than plz give me i am happy to know Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 29, 2008 jignesh ji, this is very good to know. thanks rashmi jignesh <jigneshmehta23 Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:29:53 PM blood group hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can prideict blood group by horosocp guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important ,if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than natiiv has b+ blood group,mangal and budha combinationed than o+budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than plz give me i am happy to know Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 29, 2008 Hare ramakrishna dear jignesh ji , Thanks for passing this info .Hope grp memebrs may take up charts and test it and come with their feed backs . we can also explore in case of -ve blood grps . regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah. , "jignesh" <jigneshmehta23 wrote:>> hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can > prideict blood group by horosocp > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important ,> > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than > natiiv has b+ blood group,> > mangal and budha combinationed than o+> > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+> > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+> > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than > plz give me i am happy to know> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 29, 2008 Om Namah Shivaye Namaste Jignesh ji,, I am not convinced that your theory of allocation of blood groups to assigned planet could work for very practical reasons,, It has been shown that certain ethnic groups predominantly have the same blood group.. also within family members there it is very likely that the blood groups are the same... yet a whole ethnic community or family groups wont have the same planetary combinations.. It is an area worth looking into,, I will willingly accept if the findings can be proven to be so, through research and practical results.. I am attaching some information from the bloodbank association in uk.. Where did these different blood groups come from? In the same way that people, cultures and languages change from country to country, so do blood groups. This means that some types are more common in certain ethnic and national groups and, despite the fact these groups become more mixed as people move around the globe, it's still possible to see how blood groups differ from population to population. The O group is the oldest of the blood groups. Back in the Stone Age, everyone would have been O - and today it's still the most common group in the UK, especially in the North of England. Over in Central and South America and the USA most people are O too. The fact that anyone can receive O blood reflects the fact that all other blood groups are derived from it. Group A is the second oldest blood group, appearing around 25,000 - 15,000BC, when larger human settlements first appeared as farming developed. You'll find a lot of A in Central and Eastern Europe. It's the commonest group in Norway, Denmark, Austria, Armenia and Japan. If you're looking for group B, then try the Asian communities, where around a quarter of all people share this blood group. It emerged between 15,000 and 10,000BC as tribes migrated from Africa to Europe, Asia and the Americas and mingled with other populations. The newest and rarest group, AB, only appeared between 1000 and 500 years ago, and is believed to have occurred as a response to the mixing of existing blood groups on a major scale. In Japan, China and Pakistan around 10% of the population boast this rarest of blood groups. Amazing! http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/world_blood.html Warmest regards Sheevani , " jignesh " <jigneshmehta23 wrote: > > hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can > prideict blood group by horosocp > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important , > > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than > natiiv has b+ blood group, > > mangal and budha combinationed than o+ > > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+ > > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+ > > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than > plz give me i am happy to know > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 hare ramakrishna dear shivani ji . Tahnks for the article and link But did u try his method on charts ? pls try it and let us see what is out come regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah , "sheevani147" <sheevani147 wrote:>> Om Namah Shivaye> > Namaste Jignesh ji,,> > I am not convinced that your theory of allocation of blood groups to > assigned planet could work for very practical reasons,, It has been > shown that certain ethnic groups predominantly have the same blood > group.. also within family members there it is very likely that the > blood groups are the same... yet a whole ethnic community or family > groups wont have the same planetary combinations..> > It is an area worth looking into,, I will willingly accept if the > findings can be proven to be so, through research and practical > results..> > I am attaching some information from the bloodbank association in uk..> > Where did these different blood groups come from? In the same way > that people, cultures and languages change from country to country, > so do blood groups. This means that some types are more common in > certain ethnic and national groups and, despite the fact these groups > become more mixed as people move around the globe, it's still > possible to see how blood groups differ from population to population.> > The O group is the oldest of the blood groups. Back in the Stone Age, > everyone would have been O - and today it's still the most common > group in the UK, especially in the North of England. Over in Central > and South America and the USA most people are O too. The fact that > anyone can receive O blood reflects the fact that all other blood > groups are derived from it.> > Group A is the second oldest blood group, appearing around 25,000 - > 15,000BC, when larger human settlements first appeared as farming > developed. You'll find a lot of A in Central and Eastern Europe. It's > the commonest group in Norway, Denmark, Austria, Armenia and Japan.> > If you're looking for group B, then try the Asian communities, where > around a quarter of all people share this blood group. It emerged > between 15,000 and 10,000BC as tribes migrated from Africa to Europe, > Asia and the Americas and mingled with other populations.> > The newest and rarest group, AB, only appeared between 1000 and 500 > years ago, and is believed to have occurred as a response to the > mixing of existing blood groups on a major scale. In Japan, China and > Pakistan around 10% of the population boast this rarest of blood > groups. Amazing!> > > http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/world_blood.html> > Warmest regards> Sheevani> > > , "jignesh" > jigneshmehta23@ wrote:> >> > hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u > can > > prideict blood group by horosocp > > > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more > important ,> > > > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than > > natiiv has b+ blood group,> > > > mangal and budha combinationed than o+> > > > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+> > > > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+> > > > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than > > plz give me i am happy to know> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 this is not so,pl broaden your study,i have many examples in this regard,dont be confused On 2/29/08, jignesh <jigneshmehta23 wrote: hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can prideict blood group by horosocp guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important ,if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than natiiv has b+ blood group,mangal and budha combinationed than o+budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than plz give me i am happy to know Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Dear Sri Jignesh Ji Khem-cho?..majaama? Here i have a feedback for you.. You wrote: //if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than natiiv has b+ blood group,// My Blood group is A+ Guru aspects Sani //budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+// here combination mean Guru Sani yuti? i do not have. But i have Budha Sani exchange their houses this is for your information and kindly take it as a constructive feedback rather then +Ve or -Ve :-):-) Hope this helps for your future study on the subject Regards Chandu2Chill jignesh <jigneshmehta23 Friday, February 29, 2008 1:29:53 PM blood group hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u can prideict blood group by horosocp guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more important , if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than natiiv has b+ blood group, mangal and budha combinationed than o+ budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+ mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+ and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than plz give me i am happy to know Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Om Namah Shivaye, Namaste Sunil ji, Thank you for your post,, I had a quick look through the charts of 12 family members, whose blood type is B+.. 5 of the 12 charts had NO jupiter/shani combinations by aspect or conjuction.. This includes 3 of my own kids, who definately belong to B+ group. 7 of the 12 charts had either jupiter aspecting shani or vice versa, only one had jupiter and shani in direct opposition( mutually aspecting) and had blood group B+ Hope this information is of use.. Warmest regards Sheevani , " sunil nair " <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > > > > hare ramakrishna > > dear shivani ji . > > > > Tahnks for the article and link > > But did u try his method on charts ? pls try it and let us see what is > out come > > > > regrds sunil nair > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > > > > , " sheevani147 " > <sheevani147@> wrote: > > > > Om Namah Shivaye > > > > Namaste Jignesh ji,, > > > > I am not convinced that your theory of allocation of blood groups to > > assigned planet could work for very practical reasons,, It has been > > shown that certain ethnic groups predominantly have the same blood > > group.. also within family members there it is very likely that the > > blood groups are the same... yet a whole ethnic community or family > > groups wont have the same planetary combinations.. > > > > It is an area worth looking into,, I will willingly accept if the > > findings can be proven to be so, through research and practical > > results.. > > > > I am attaching some information from the bloodbank association in uk.. > > > > Where did these different blood groups come from? In the same way > > that people, cultures and languages change from country to country, > > so do blood groups. This means that some types are more common in > > certain ethnic and national groups and, despite the fact these groups > > become more mixed as people move around the globe, it's still > > possible to see how blood groups differ from population to population. > > > > The O group is the oldest of the blood groups. Back in the Stone Age, > > everyone would have been O - and today it's still the most common > > group in the UK, especially in the North of England. Over in Central > > and South America and the USA most people are O too. The fact that > > anyone can receive O blood reflects the fact that all other blood > > groups are derived from it. > > > > Group A is the second oldest blood group, appearing around 25,000 - > > 15,000BC, when larger human settlements first appeared as farming > > developed. You'll find a lot of A in Central and Eastern Europe. It's > > the commonest group in Norway, Denmark, Austria, Armenia and Japan. > > > > If you're looking for group B, then try the Asian communities, where > > around a quarter of all people share this blood group. It emerged > > between 15,000 and 10,000BC as tribes migrated from Africa to Europe, > > Asia and the Americas and mingled with other populations. > > > > The newest and rarest group, AB, only appeared between 1000 and 500 > > years ago, and is believed to have occurred as a response to the > > mixing of existing blood groups on a major scale. In Japan, China and > > Pakistan around 10% of the population boast this rarest of blood > > groups. Amazing! > > > > > > http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/world_blood.html > > > > Warmest regards > > Sheevani > > > > > > , " jignesh " > > jigneshmehta23@ wrote: > > > > > > hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like u > > can > > > prideict blood group by horosocp > > > > > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more > > important , > > > > > > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also than > > > natiiv has b+ blood group, > > > > > > mangal and budha combinationed than o+ > > > > > > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+ > > > > > > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+ > > > > > > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas than > > > plz give me i am happy to know > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Hare rama krishna. dear shivani ji Thanks for the quick response ,i also request other members to test it with known charts .I will also try to do it with known persons ,but my problems is i hav to start fresh as i dont know blood grp of many persons . thanks and regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah , "sheevani147" <sheevani147 wrote:>> > Om Namah Shivaye,> > Namaste Sunil ji,> > Thank you for your post,,> > I had a quick look through the charts of 12 family members, whose > blood type is B+..> > 5 of the 12 charts had NO jupiter/shani combinations by aspect or > conjuction.. This includes 3 of my own kids, who definately belong to > B+ group. > > > 7 of the 12 charts had either jupiter aspecting shani or vice versa, > only one had jupiter and shani in direct opposition( mutually > aspecting) and had blood group B+> > > Hope this information is of use..> > Warmest regards> Sheevani> > > > > , "sunil nair" > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > hare ramakrishna> > > > dear shivani ji .> > > > > > > > Tahnks for the article and link> > > > But did u try his method on charts ? pls try it and let us see what > is> > out come> > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah> > > > > > > > > > , "sheevani147"> > <sheevani147@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Namah Shivaye> > >> > > Namaste Jignesh ji,,> > >> > > I am not convinced that your theory of allocation of blood groups > to> > > assigned planet could work for very practical reasons,, It has > been> > > shown that certain ethnic groups predominantly have the same blood> > > group.. also within family members there it is very likely that > the> > > blood groups are the same... yet a whole ethnic community or > family> > > groups wont have the same planetary combinations..> > >> > > It is an area worth looking into,, I will willingly accept if the> > > findings can be proven to be so, through research and practical> > > results..> > >> > > I am attaching some information from the bloodbank association in > uk..> > >> > > Where did these different blood groups come from? In the same way> > > that people, cultures and languages change from country to > country,> > > so do blood groups. This means that some types are more common in> > > certain ethnic and national groups and, despite the fact these > groups> > > become more mixed as people move around the globe, it's still> > > possible to see how blood groups differ from population to > population.> > >> > > The O group is the oldest of the blood groups. Back in the Stone > Age,> > > everyone would have been O - and today it's still the most common> > > group in the UK, especially in the North of England. Over in > Central> > > and South America and the USA most people are O too. The fact that> > > anyone can receive O blood reflects the fact that all other blood> > > groups are derived from it.> > >> > > Group A is the second oldest blood group, appearing around > 25,000 -> > > 15,000BC, when larger human settlements first appeared as farming> > > developed. You'll find a lot of A in Central and Eastern Europe. > It's> > > the commonest group in Norway, Denmark, Austria, Armenia and > Japan.> > >> > > If you're looking for group B, then try the Asian communities, > where> > > around a quarter of all people share this blood group. It emerged> > > between 15,000 and 10,000BC as tribes migrated from Africa to > Europe,> > > Asia and the Americas and mingled with other populations.> > >> > > The newest and rarest group, AB, only appeared between 1000 and > 500> > > years ago, and is believed to have occurred as a response to the> > > mixing of existing blood groups on a major scale. In Japan, China > and> > > Pakistan around 10% of the population boast this rarest of blood> > > groups. Amazing!> > >> > >> > > http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/world_blood.html> > >> > > Warmest regards> > > Sheevani> > >> > >> > > , "jignesh"> > > jigneshmehta23@ wrote:> > > >> > > > hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like > u> > > can> > > > prideict blood group by horosocp> > > >> > > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more> > > important ,> > > >> > > > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also > than> > > > natiiv has b+ blood group,> > > >> > > > mangal and budha combinationed than o+> > > >> > > > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+> > > >> > > > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+> > > >> > > > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas > than> > > > plz give me i am happy to know> > > >> > >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Dear Sunil, I don't think the given conditions for the blood group pass many charts. For a qucik check I checked mine and my wife's. Both are O+ve. But, we don't have the said combination. Regards, Krishna Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear krishna ji . I was thinking abt u ,after the crash of ur system u seems to be down . So i was thinking i must request u to do a reserch on this grounds with known charts and collected only for this purpose . Let us be open to any ideas ,and may needs some corrections . or if not working in majorrity of the case s then we can discard also >but astrology we cannot expect 100% replicable results .as i find some combos in charts can reverse also .esp influnce of rahu or ketu ,we hav to find it. thank for informing me regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah . , Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote:>> Dear Sunil,> > I don't think the given conditions for the blood group pass many charts. For a qucik check I checked mine and my wife's. Both are O+ve. But, we don't have the said combination.> > Regards,> Krishna Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted March 1, 2008 Om Namah Shivaye, Namaste Sunil ji, May I just offer my thoughts on blood groups.. Perhaps we need to look the planet Mars,, the significator of blood and blood products.. and look at the tattwa of the rashis it is placed in/ or owns.. This direction seems to have more logical appeal to me.. Of course I might be totally wrong.... warmest regards Sheevani , Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: > > Dear Sunil, > > I don't think the given conditions for the blood group pass many charts. For a qucik check I checked mine and my wife's. Both are O+ve. But, we don't have the said combination. > > Regards, > Krishna > > sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > Hare rama krishna. > dear shivani ji > > Thanks for the quick response ,i also request other members to test it with known charts .I will also try to do it with known persons ,but my problems is i hav to start fresh as i dont know blood grp of many persons . > > thanks and regrds > sunil nair > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > , " sheevani147 " <sheevani147@> wrote: > > > > > > Om Namah Shivaye, > > > > Namaste Sunil ji, > > > > Thank you for your post,, > > > > I had a quick look through the charts of 12 family members, whose > > blood type is B+.. > > > > 5 of the 12 charts had NO jupiter/shani combinations by aspect or > > conjuction.. This includes 3 of my own kids, who definately belong to > > B+ group. > > > > > > 7 of the 12 charts had either jupiter aspecting shani or vice versa, > > only one had jupiter and shani in direct opposition( mutually > > aspecting) and had blood group B+ > > > > > > Hope this information is of use.. > > > > Warmest regards > > Sheevani > > > > > > > > > > , " sunil nair " > > astro_tellerkerala@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hare ramakrishna > > > > > > dear shivani ji . > > > > > > > > > > > > Tahnks for the article and link > > > > > > But did u try his method on charts ? pls try it and let us see what > > is > > > out come > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds sunil nair > > > > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " sheevani147 " > > > <sheevani147@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Om Namah Shivaye > > > > > > > > Namaste Jignesh ji,, > > > > > > > > I am not convinced that your theory of allocation of blood groups > > to > > > > assigned planet could work for very practical reasons,, It has > > been > > > > shown that certain ethnic groups predominantly have the same blood > > > > group.. also within family members there it is very likely that > > the > > > > blood groups are the same... yet a whole ethnic community or > > family > > > > groups wont have the same planetary combinations.. > > > > > > > > It is an area worth looking into,, I will willingly accept if the > > > > findings can be proven to be so, through research and practical > > > > results.. > > > > > > > > I am attaching some information from the bloodbank association in > > uk.. > > > > > > > > Where did these different blood groups come from? In the same way > > > > that people, cultures and languages change from country to > > country, > > > > so do blood groups. This means that some types are more common in > > > > certain ethnic and national groups and, despite the fact these > > groups > > > > become more mixed as people move around the globe, it's still > > > > possible to see how blood groups differ from population to > > population. > > > > > > > > The O group is the oldest of the blood groups. Back in the Stone > > Age, > > > > everyone would have been O - and today it's still the most common > > > > group in the UK, especially in the North of England. Over in > > Central > > > > and South America and the USA most people are O too. The fact that > > > > anyone can receive O blood reflects the fact that all other blood > > > > groups are derived from it. > > > > > > > > Group A is the second oldest blood group, appearing around > > 25,000 - > > > > 15,000BC, when larger human settlements first appeared as farming > > > > developed. You'll find a lot of A in Central and Eastern Europe. > > It's > > > > the commonest group in Norway, Denmark, Austria, Armenia and > > Japan. > > > > > > > > If you're looking for group B, then try the Asian communities, > > where > > > > around a quarter of all people share this blood group. It emerged > > > > between 15,000 and 10,000BC as tribes migrated from Africa to > > Europe, > > > > Asia and the Americas and mingled with other populations. > > > > > > > > The newest and rarest group, AB, only appeared between 1000 and > > 500 > > > > years ago, and is believed to have occurred as a response to the > > > > mixing of existing blood groups on a major scale. In Japan, China > > and > > > > Pakistan around 10% of the population boast this rarest of blood > > > > groups. Amazing! > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/world_blood.html > > > > > > > > Warmest regards > > > > Sheevani > > > > > > > > > > > > , " jignesh " > > > > jigneshmehta23@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hi i am jignesh mehta i have some my own idea in astorlogy like > > u > > > > can > > > > > prideict blood group by horosocp > > > > > > > > > > guru , sani , budh , and mangal this four palnat are more > > > > important , > > > > > > > > > > if guru and sani combination any how not only yuti drusti also > > than > > > > > natiiv has b+ blood group, > > > > > > > > > > mangal and budha combinationed than o+ > > > > > > > > > > budha and guru and sani combinationed than a+ > > > > > > > > > > mangal budha and guru and sani combinationed than ab+ > > > > > > > > > > and i have n't idea about nagaive group so if u have any ideas > > than > > > > > plz give me i am happy to know > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
