Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Response by Prof Saraswat to the article on Vedic Astrology - the greatest fraud on the Vedas! by Avtar Krishen Kaul

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

WAVES-Vedic , subash razdan <subashrazdan

wrote:

 

Dear Subash,

 

Here are my comments about the article presented below......

 

While attending the annual conference of the Academy of

International Business in China in June, I had a fabulous two week

trip to Beijing and Shanghai with a group of ten faculty members

from Bentley. The trip gave us an opportunity to see the Great Wall

of China, about 80 miles north of Beijing. I want to tell you the

thought that came to my mind as I was standing on the wall after

climbing the uneven stairs for almost an hour. At the end of the

5th century AD, the Huns from Central Asia tried to attack China but

the Chinese army defeated them decisively at this 3,000 mile long

wall with fortifications at strategic places. Unfortunately, the

Huns turned westwards after their defeat in China and changed the

course of history by destroying two great empires of the ancient

times. One branch of the Huns ravaged Europe and destroyed the

Roman Empire and another branch turned towards India at the time

when the Gupta Empire was at its zenith. From their bases at Bamian

and Balkh, one of the Hun commanders, Toramana, defeated the Gupta

army and occupied Kashmir, Punjab, and Malwa, and his son,

Mihiragula, extended the Hun conquest to Gujarat. North India, as a

Hindu empire, never recovered from this disaster and the ground was

prepared for the Moslem conquest of India.

 

In the declining stages of the Gupta Empire, India was infested

with Ponga pundits, fortune tellers and astrologers of all kinds,

and the bewildering superstitions of the Purans had supplanted the

sublime wisdom of the Vedas.

 

Perhaps this is the ultimate truth of history: empires rise and

fall on the undulating waves of time, but the Chinese empire did a

better job of protecting itself by relying on its own efforts by

building the wall rather than waiting for some preternatural

interposition at the last moment, as you often see in Bollywood

movies.

 

After seeing Beijing and Shanghai I am convinced that the Chinese

are now building their infrastructure with the same enthusiasm that

they showed in building the Great Wall thousands of years ago.

 

I fully agree with the broad analysis of your friend Mr. Kaul. We

can disagree on some small facts here and there but I am deeply

impressed by the power of his arguments and the facts he has given

from our scriptures to support them. I have myself found no

astrological forecasts in the Rigveda, which I have been studying

for more than 15 years now. I will give you an example of what I

have found in the Rigveda about stars and galaxies. One of the

greatest rishis of the Vedas, Devaraata, looks at the stars and

with the childlike curiosity of ?Twinkle, twinkle little star?? he

says to himself, ?All these constellations shining so high in the

sky show up at night but I wonder where they go at daytime. The

laws of Varuna, the sacred spirit that controls the movement of

stars, are so inviolable that the moon comes at night and shines for

us.? Of course, Devaraata is composing the noble thought in

Sanskrit with the perfect measure and cadence of words of the ?

trishtubh?

meter:

 

?amii ya rixaa nihitaasa uchchaa naktaM dadRishre kuhachiddiveyuH

adabdhaani varuNasya vRtaani vichaakashachchandramaa naktameti? [1,

24, 10]

 

I was looking at the stars one night from my backyard while reciting

this mantra and as the intensity of the thought increased in my

mind, I had an authentic mystical experience. Suddenly I felt that

my physical body had disappeared and I was floating freely among the

stars and constellations as pure thought submerged in the spiritual

rays pouring through the transparent darkness of night. The sense

of delight was overwhelming and the entire experience was awe

inspiring but, unfortunately, it did not last for more than a

second. When I woke up from my trance, I realized that it was

nothing more than my silly imagination. But what a beautiful

imagination it was! I would like to repeat the experience every time

I look at the firmament at night. This to me is the Vedic

experience, not what the fortune tellers can tell me about my

future. I am convinced, just like Mr. Kaul, that unless we go back

to the bedrock principles of the Vedas and devote our energies to the

understanding of the fundamental forces that create, preserve, and

destroy the universe, nations, cultures and individuals, we are in

grave danger of becoming slaves again. One of the greatest

strengths of our culture has been that we have preserved our soul

intact through all the vicissitudes of history but, I am afraid, we

are now losing it gradually and willingly because we do not have the

learned sages of the Vedas to inspire us.

 

Warm regards to you.

 

Satya Prakash

 

Satya Prakash Saraswat, Ph.D.

Professor of Information and Process Management

Bentley College

175 Forest Street

Waltham, MA 02452

USA

USA

Phone: 781-891-3104

Fax: 781-891-2949

 

 

 

 

 

 

" Vedic Astrology " - the greatest fraud on the Vedas!

Submitted by jyotirved on Sat, 2006-04-22 12:54. -->Submitted by

jyotirved on Sat, 2006-04-22 12:54.

Dear Biradari Members,

Namaskar Mahara!!

Kashmiri Pandits are as addicted to Patri Melapak (Tekini milnavuni)

as anybody else! Besides, there is hardly anyone, even if he does

not know ABC of jyotish, who does not want to know as to when his ?

badsharwar? (sade?sati) will start or end etc. etc. I have gone

through all those pangs myself and made a thorough study of all the

astrological works besides a lot of astronomical books! I even

studied Western system of astrology and had become a ?famous?

astrologer, though my predictions were as correct as anybody else?s

i.e. hardly 50%. However, this is a secret that no other ?jyotishi?

shares with anybody -- that his/her predictions are hardly more

correct than fifty per cent, whatever logic or Ayanamsha he may

use! When I analyzed the reasons for such a dismal rate of

success/failure, the conclusions were startling! And I am keeping

those very conclusions before you!

I have been asked very often whether I would prefer Western system

of predictions to the Indian system or vice-versa!

To arrive at any conclusions about such a discussion, we have to

bear the following facts in our minds:

1. Whether Indian or Western, no system of predictions has any

sanction either from the Vedas or even Puranas least of all our

dharmashastras etc.

2. All our shastras admonish us from consulting ?nakshatra

jeevis? so much so that the Manusmriti calls these nakshatrajeevis

as outcastes and not fit to sit in any sabha of learned people.

3. The Manusmriti advises that ?The king must keep a watch on his

kingdom like a heron and act with prowess like a lion? --- nowhere

has he advised to consult some soothsayer before undertaking any

activity!

4. All the Ramayanas, whether Valmiki or Adhyatma or

Ramacharitamanasa etc. etc. say that before deciding about the

coronation of Bhagwan Rama, Dashratha wanted his guru Vasishtha to

find some suitable muhurtas for that function. It was on the advice

of Bhagwan Vasishtha that Dasharatha decided to anoint the Yuvraja

the very next day, as it was ?Tishya? then. It is clear that either

Vasishtha Muni did not know as to what was going to happen to

Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as crown-prince or he kept

quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine

dispensation!

Obviously, being the son of Brahmaji and being a highly exalted yogi

as well as jnyani, Vasishtha-muni could peep into past as well as

future. It means that even if some exalted souls can foresee as to

what is going to happen, they do not reveal our ?bhavishya? before

hand, unlike the breed of astrologers of today, who masquerade as ?

Paasharas? and ?Vamadevas? to tell us even our past and future

janmas just by glancing at our birth-charts, even if those charts

are fundamentally incorrect.

5. Almost all the jyotishis suggest one or the other remedial

measure to their clients, and mostly these are in the form of

various gems. What is surprising is that we have become so

dimwitted that we forget our entire itihasa of our past!

(i) Why was Dasharatha not suggested some ?ruby? or ?

coral? to ward off the evil Dasha that was going to kill him when

Rama would leave for the forests?

Because our Rishis were not greedy to have claimed to cheat death by

just making him buy some gems!

(ii) Bhagwan Krishna was born in a prison --- I wonder why He

could not use some ?sapphire? to take birth in a palace!

(iii)Vasudeva and Devaki---the parents of Bhagwan Krishna--- were in

chains when He was born! It is said that Lord Krishna was a

complete ? 16 kala sampoorna --- divine incarnation of Vishnu and

was thus really Omnipotent, Omnipresent and Omniscient! He could

loosen the chains of His mother as well as father while taking birth

in a prison! He could make all the guards of Kansa?s prison fall

asleep while being taken out of prison by Vasudeva! He demonstrated

His Omnipotence by making Yamuna recede while Vasudeva was carrying

Him to Gokul from Mathura! He guided Vasudeva on his way back from

Gokul to Mathura in a dark night full of torrential rains and

storms! The guards remained asleep till Vasudeva entered the prison

after bringing Yogamaya from Mathura with him! It all shows that

Krishna was really Omnipotent!

But then the moment Vasudeva was back in prison, his fetters were

again gridlocked automatically! Same was the case with Devaki! Both

Devaki and Vasudeva remained in fetters till Kansa was killed by

Krishna!

What does it demonstrate? Just the fact that if the Omniscient,

Omnipresent and Omnipotent Krishna could not ameliorate the miseries

of His own father or mother before the appointed time, how can a

ruby or a sapphire---or some Mangala or Shani yagya--- remove all

our miseries or give us a Union Minister?s seat!

Obviously, we are being taken for a ride by such Jyotishis!

Then not in the distant past, Smti Indira Gandhi would run after

astrologers for knowing her future. She had a rare and original

ekamukhi rudraksha, which only either the Maharaja of Nepal had or

she was wearing! It is said that some top-notch jyotishis had

suggested that rudraksha to her! Ironically, both the King of Nepal

as well Mrs. Indira Gandhi were assassinated ?by the people? they ?

had trusted? ekamukhi rudraksha not withstanding!

What does it prove? That we should not be hoodwinked by soothsayers!

Then again a well known Tantrik of yore---highly respected by the

then PM--- is out on bail, not by dint of his ?Tantra-Kriya? but

because of some legal loopholes in FERA!

Dhirendra Brahmachari, another high profile ?Tantrik?, met with an

accident in the plane he was flying himself! If he could not see

his own death looming large how could he forewarn others!

6. The Gita is said to be the gist of all our shastras. When Arjuna

expressed his doubt about whether Pandavas would win or lose the

battle, Bhagwan Krishna neither asked him to consult some soothsayer

nor did He tell him to wear some ruby! On the other hand, He just

advised him to fight and either get killed on the battlefield and go

to heavens or win the battle to be the ruler of the entire earth!

What does that prove? Obviously, it warns us against relying on any

soothsayers, especially if they call themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?

since they are taking us for a ride literally.

7. Yes, Bhagwan Ram did worship Shiva at the time of going to war at

Rameshwaram but that was not to please Mangal or Shani, but to show

respect to the divine trinity -- Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh---in

this case Vishnu worshipping Shiva!

Similarly, at the time of the Mahabharata war Arjuna was asked to

worship Maha-Shakti but not to please Rahu or Ketu but to gain

strength from his own ATMA-Shakti, in the form of Divine Shakti!

The Gita is very clear ?ye yatha mam prapadyante tanstathaiva

bajameaham? --- ?I will

?worship? you in whatever way you worship Me?.

8. There is no mention of any Rishi like Vasishtha or Garga or

Brighu ever having written any works of predictive astrology

in any of the Puranas. The Vishnu Purana by Parasharis is full of

astronomical references ---and that also sayana i.e. the seasonal

year when Mesha sankranti is another name of Spring Equinox and so

on, but we do not find any mention of any Brihat Parasharis Hora

Shastra there! Obviously, it is the worst concoction that can ever

be had, and that is why it is the bible of ?Vedic astrologers?

9. In India, we have started going downhill ever since our rulers

started runningafter Jyotishis. In ancient days, during the time of

Mahabharata, it was a dharma yudha that we had to fight against our

own Duryodhanas but ever since the advent of astrology before the

invasion of Alexander the Great, and with him the ?Yavana Jatakam?

of Sphujidwaja and the Surya Sidhanta of Maya the Yavana

(mlechha!), we had to fight outsiders! The more the outsiders

invaded us the more our rulers started consulting soothsayers whom

they called Rajyajyotishis! (In those days jyotishis did not dare

to call themselves Vedic Jyotishis since the general public was not

then that illiterate about the Vedic principles as they are thee

days, thanks to Vedic Jyotishis!)

10. These monarchs wanted to know if at all their horoscopes

indicated whether they would win or lose and for winning the

battles, instead of making military preparations they just started

wearing rubies and diamonds to ward off evil spirits!

11. The maximum credit for creating such a fear of omens and

ghosts and ghouls and storms and even clouds goes to

Varahamihira! It appears he later reincarnated as N. C. Lahiri

since both of them had their own axes to grind -- the former wanted

to make his Brihatsamhita/Brihat Jatakam and Panchasidhantika world

famous and the latter wanted to sell the maximum copies of his

Bangla Vishudha Sidhanta Panjika and ?Lahiri?s Indian Ephemeris??.

Before venturing into the battlefield, these monarchs would ask

their soothsayer to prepare ?narpati jaya charya? and consult Brihat

Samhita etc. to see whether the ?ketuchara? was favorable at that

time or not! No wonder with such a preliminary and hopeless

knowledge of astronomical facts, we were being pushed back into dark

ages by these jyotishis!

12. Our historical records are witness to the fact that we were

vanquished in every battle whether it was with Alexander the

Great or Chengiz Khan or Muhamud of Gazni or Nadir Shah or the

Moguls or finally the East India Company, thanks to the dependence

of our monarchs on soothsayers (Rajajyotishis, huh!) instead of the

principles of war strategy and statecraft as adumbrated by Chanakya,

who chided the kings for consulting soothsayers!

12. The fate of BJP has not been any better than that of our earlier

monarchs by depending more on their ?Vedic Jyotishis? who were

responsible for getting ?Vedic Jyotisha (sic!)? prescribed in Indian

Universities! It is that very move that boomeranged on the party

and even the ?Minister of astrology? did not even win his own

parliamentary seat, let alone being the Union Minister again, lest

these ?Vedic jyotishis? continued to perpetuate Adharma in the guise

of ?Vedic Jyotisha?! Do you need any other proofs of the fact that

these ?Vedic Jyotishis? are really a scourge who will make you lose

your seat of power just by making you advance your elections?

13. If we continue to follow the trend of our ?monarchs? of having

blind faith in our soothsayers, there is no doubt that sooner than

later we will become yesteryears? Babylon, which is known as Iraq

these days!

14. It was priest class i.e. Brahmins the most respected community

with whom the secrets of predictive gimmicks were supposed to

rest! Just see the plight of the Brahmin community these days!

They age treated worse than any OBC in case of government jobs and

other quotas! Why so? Simply because they lost their dharma by

being nakshatra jeevis, caring two hoots for the admonishments of

the Manu! No wonder they ? the Brahmins are not fit for being

consulted in any sabha of scholars!

15. I must put on record that as a Kashmiri Pandit, I have more

to blame predictive gimmicks and soothsayers, including the

panchanga makers, than anything or anybody else since they never ?

forearmed? (their pet dialogue is ?forewarned is forearmed!)us about

any calamities that were going to befall us! On the other hand,

just to prove their astrological gimmicks, they just made ---and are

still making --- us celebrate all our festivals, including

Mahashivaratri on wrong days. It is these very jyotishis, whom we

had treated as our friends, philosophers and guides, who are

responsible for our downfall as Kahsmiri Pandits, since they proved

neither our friends, nor philosophers least of all our guides!

These Panchanga makers/jyotishis were the first to flee from

Kashmir --- like the king Hari Sigh at the time of Pakistani raid

in 1948 (hope he had consulted his ?rajajyotishi? to decide the

muhurtas for taking the last flight to Jammu/Mumbai)----since they

had already

made their alternate homes in safer places like Jammu and Delhi

They just proved to be Shylocks, who were only interested in their

Pound of flesh by way of Dakshinas for janmapatris and panchangas

and matching of horoscopes -- all cheating and nothing else!

16. These soothsayers have such a hypnotic grip on us that

initially even I was brain washed to believe that the Vedas had

nothing else to tell us excepting teaching us predictive astrology!

I was also so convinced that it appeared that even the principle of

Secondary Progressions must have been exported from India to Western

countries since the principle of ?A day equals a year? was mentioned

in our Vedas!

17. However, there are neither rashis like Mesha etc. nor planets

like Mangal, Shani etc.

in the Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmanas etc. etc. Similarly, Vedanga

Jyotisha, as has been made clear several times already, is an

astronomical work of 14th century BCE and tells us as to how to

calculate mean tithi, nakshatra and Uttarayana-cum-Tapah-cum Magha

etc. months. It does not list any rashis nor any planets like

Mangal, Budha etc. Same is the case with Yajur Jyotisha of about

11th century BCE and later Atharva Jyotisha of about 5th century

BCE. As such, it is really a fraud on the Vedas being played by

some charlatans to call any predictive gimmicks as Vedic astrology

and hail themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?. It is equally a crime under

Consumer Protection Act since it is a misrepresentation of facts to

a client and is thus a deficiency in service.

18.It is being said that Sir Isaac Newton believed in astrology!

That just is not possible! The astronomical ephemeredes, from

which horoscopes are made, were so incorrect that ?Horary Astrology?

by a world famous Western astrologer, William Lilly, of 17th

century, published by American Federation of Astrologers, has the

planetary positions of all the charts incorrect! He was a

contemporary of Sir Isaac Newton, and thus even if Newton had wanted

to believe in predictive astrology, he could never have done so

since the astronomical works of that period were fundamentally

incorrect as they were mostly based on Ptolemy?s Almagest!

In other words, the astronomical works of the West were hardly

better than the Surya Sidhanta or Aryabhati of India!

19.Similarly, Albert Einstein is supposed to have believed in

astrology! Dr. B. V. Raman has not said so anywhere in his ?world

famous? book ?Notable Horoscopes? while discussing the horoscope of

Einstein! Similarly, there has been no such indication in any of

the astrological magazines which normally jump on such hearsays to

encash them! It maybe mentioned here that even in the ?Notable

Horoscopes? hardly any chart even of the 20th century is correct,

leave alone the charts of Bhagwan Krishna or Gautama the Budha or

Shankaracharya! There is also a difference of heaven and earth in

the planetary longitudes of the same work in a consolidated form

given at pages 426 to 431 and the main charts given in the chart

form! Even the chart of the erstwhile editor of the Astrological

Magazine viz. Dr. B. V. Raman himself given at page No. 401 is

incorrect! And he was supposed to be the ?greatest Vedic astrologer?

of the twentieth century but surprisingly, could not calculate

even his own horoscope properly!

Same is the case with the chart No. 74, which is actually the

chart of the spouse of Dr. B. V. Raman! The planetary longitudes on

that page do not at all tally with the ones given at page 470 in the

same book!

And the delineations of all such charts are correct! In other

words, ?Vedic astrology? can make correct predictions only from

incorrect data!

20. We have demonstrated it practically through ?Mahesh? that it

is impossible for any astrological predictions to have been correct

in the past either based as they were on the data from the Surya

Sidhanta or Aryabhati or Brahma Sphuta Sidhanta or Sidhanta

Shiromani ----whether they were supposed to be so called nirayana or

so called sayana! But then may be that is the beauty of predictive

astrology -- whether ?Vedic? or ?not-so-Vedic? --- to make correct

predictions from incorrect data!

21. Predictive astrology is supposed to be a ?science?! What a

preposterous statement! When the data on which predictions were

based or are based these days are not correct, how can the results

be correct and how can we draw correct inferences when we have not

made correct observations at all!

22. It is said that stars affect us! It appears either these

astrologers have gone honkers themselves or they suppose that all

the world has really gone mad! Let us see how:

I am a tiny human being on this small planet called earth. The sun

is hundreds of thousands of times larger than the earth! And there

are other stars of our nakshatra/rashichakra that are supposed to

affect me individually as per the Dasha-Bhukti that is running in my

horoscope! However, this fantastic statement has no leg to stand

upon since the nearest star of that Rashichakra is Alpha Aquilae

which is known as Shravana in Sanskrit! And do you know its distance

from me? It is seventeen light years! And it is several times

larger than our sun! In other words, if that star wants to ?affect?

me individually, it will take it at least seventeen years to do so

even if that ?effect? travels at the speed of light! And by then,

my Rahu or Shani or whatever Dasha it may be must have been over!

Then how can such a star which is trillions of times larger than me

send its rays in a concentrated from just to haunt me at a

particular point of time! Can you imagine what type of laughing

stocks we are making of ourselves by believing in such hocus pocus!

Similarly, the next nearest star of our Rashichakra is Alpha Bootis

known as Swati in Sanskrit! It is away by 26 light years from me

and is again several times larger than our sun!!

It thus defies imagination as to how a scientist like Albert

Einstein could have made a statement like ?stars affect us?! I m

sure he could not have been cowed down by the special ?aura? or ?

halo? which these ?Jyotishis? are supposed to have since that is

only to befool simpletons like ignorant adivasis!

Secondly, by quoting Newton and Einstein, these ?Vedic Jyotishis?

are themselves proving that they have no common sense at all! If at

all these two scientists did claim to believe in astrology, they

would have believed in Western system since there was no ?Vedic

Jyotish? around those days! And these two systems are just

antitheses to one another ? they cannot be integrated at any point

of time since if my sayana moon is in Vrisha, my nirayana moon is in

Mesha and so on! Similarly, there are no Dasha bhuktis in the

Western system nor is there any Sade-Sati etc. Thus whatever

support they try to muster for their preposterous claims goes in

fact against the very grain of their own arguments!

23. It is being said that quite a few Western ?Vamadevas? and

other ?Rishis? have started believing in ?Vedic Jyotish?. We

must not forget that Westerners like their Eastern counter-parts are

interested in earning a few bucks the quickest way! Just by reading

a few books by Dr. B. V. Raman or K. N. Rao etc. etc. and the much

touted ?Brihat Parashara Hora Shastram? they can declare themselves

as qualified ?Vedic astrologers? It is immaterial if they cannot

pronounce even the words of shantipath like ?poornam adah poornam

idam? properly or correctly, leave alone understanding their

meaning, but then we have become so blind because of greed and

avarice that we just let them masquerade as ?Vamadevas? and ?

Parasharas?. This can happen only with Hindu religion, which we are

supposed to defend! Why don?t these ?Vamadevas? proclaim themselves

to be re-incarnations of Jesus Christ or St. Paul or St. John and so

on! We have already a glut of so many incarnations like Radha

and Dattatreya and so on and so forth that we hardly need imported

Vamadevas! Thus instead of preserving our cultural integrity, we are

appreciating the efforts of ?Vedic Jyotishi East India Company? to

help us disintegrate our own culture by propagating some non-sense

called ?Vedic Jyotish? in overseas countries as well as in India.

I do not know how many times I will have to repeat it that

predictive gimmicks are against the letter as well as spirit of the

Vedas, Puranas, Itihasas and Smritis and therefore, have to be

shunned at the earliest! And naturally, these imported ?Vamadevas?

are just jugglers who have no other motives but to make fools of us

and make us deviate from our cultural heritage, pretending as if

they are propagating it!

24.I have yet to receive any response to my challenge to all these

jyotishis to quote even a single reference from any of our shastras

which has advised us to marry only after matching horoscopes! Leave

alone shastras, they cannot quote anything even from their own ?

Jyotisha bibles?. What type of experts are these ?Vamadevas? and ?

Parasharas? and ?Varahamihiras? if they cannot vindicate their

statements/stands even by a single shastric text?

Do you need any other proofs to understand that you are really being

made a fool by these jyotishis?

The last nail in the coffin of astrological gimmicks is the chart

for the new lunar year! It has been proved by me already quoting

all the relevant Vedas and shastras that the current lunar New Year

started on February 28, 2006, with the topocentric New Moon for

Delhi at exactly 5hrs 0mts IST. But then all the vernacular papers,

apart from astrological magazines, are making predictions for the

new year on the basis of a lunar New Year supposed to start from

March 30, 2006, with the chart for New Moon being prepared for 15hrs

45 mts. IST on March 29, 2006. In fact that is the time of

Geocentric New Moon for an imaginary ?centre of the earth? whereas

the actual time of topocentric New Moon for Delhi on that date is

17hrs 26 mts. IST!

You can see it for yourself that not only is the very date of the

New Year chart for a wrong date ? March 29 instead of February 28,

but even the timing of erecting that chart is based on a geocentric

New Moon instead of the New Moon with parallax corrections for

Delhi, which is known as topocentric phenomenon!

But then, as usual, these jyotishis will claim to have made correct

predictions for our ?matribhoomi? i.e. Bharatavarsha since, even at

the cost of repeating a statement for the umpteenth time, these

Vedic jyotishis can make correct predictions only from fundamentally

incorrect data!

In view of the above discussion, it is clear that predictive

gimmicks have no basis either as per the shastras or modern

sciences. It is immaterial whether these predictive techniques are

of Indian system ? euphemistically known as ?Vedic Jyotisha? or

Western system. On the other hand, the so called Vedic Jyotisha has

made us celebrate all our festivals on wrong days and the earlier we

shun it the better so that we can start using a seasonal year for

deciding our fasts, fairs, festivals and muhurtas.

When are you going to do that?

With kind regards,

Avtar Krishen Kaul

PS. For complete details and a free program to calculate planetary

data from 10001 BC to 12030 AD, please log on to:

HinduCalendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaskaar Friends,Below is my simple reply to Sri Avtar Kishen Kaul, who has been harping about Astrology not being Vedic. I have replied but only for the information of my Vedic Astrology friends. My reply to him is in Blue color.

 

1. Whether Indian or Western, no system of predictions has any

sanction either from the Vedas or even Puranas least of all our

dharmashastras etc. (BHARAT start)I see you have a wrong meaning of Vedic Astrology. Predictions isn't Vedic Astrology. Indications are. The fundamental cause and effect relationship exists and that is what is to be indicated for a said karma. Kindly read the following:

Vedanga refers to those bodies of knowledge

that are the " limbs " to the Vedas. In other words, it aids in

understanding of the Vedas.It would be important to understand

what Vedas are. The word " Veda " means knowledge. Vedas contain

aphorisms to understand the true identity of ourselves. Many people

think Vedas are part of Hindu Religion. It would correct to say that

Hindu Religion has adopted itself from the Vedas. Vedas are universal

and came before the word " Hindu " came into being.Jyotish is a

Vedanga and in its approach it follows the Vedic teaching. Jyotish

cannot go against the Vedas in its teaching or analysis.Jyotish

follows the principle of freedom of choice. It gives individuals the

right to choose in any given situation. The choices always available to

an individual in any given situation of life are:1. To react (anger, jealousy, envy, fear, fight, arrogance, likes, dislikes, etc.)2. To pro act (do one's action as required by the call of duty, without involving oneself in the above reactions).

3. Remain calm without any action (Realizing the results are given by the lord, and accepting them without any reaction)The

2nd choice has all the elements of the 3rd choice. Jyotish as a subject

never undermines these choices. With these choices, one can change

one's future. With the first choice, one can enhance the difficulties

in one's destiny and with, the second and third choice; one can enhance

the quality of destiny in happiness and success. Each time you make the

2nd or 3rd choice, you weaken the reactions within yourself. Over a

period of time, you stop reacting at all. Jyotish understands this

principle and employs it.Jyotish never promises a pre destined

life. Mother, father, brother, sister may be predestined but not your

future. Your future depends upon the choices. (BHARAT end)

 

 

2. All our shastras admonish us from consulting ?nakshatra

jeevis? so much so that the Manusmriti calls these nakshatrajeevis

as outcastes and not fit to sit in any sabha of learned people.(BHARAT start)Manu smriti also talks a lot about treatment of women, etc. I am sure you do not follow the same. (BHARAT end)

 

3. The Manusmriti advises that ?The king must keep a watch on his

kingdom like a heron and act with prowess like a lion? --- nowhere

has he advised to consult some soothsayer before undertaking any

activity!(BHARAT start)People do quote from books that they themselves do not follow, just to drill a point. I take it that you did the same.

(BHARAT end)

 

4. All the Ramayanas, whether Valmiki or Adhyatma or

Ramacharitamanasa etc. etc. say that before deciding about the

coronation of Bhagwan Rama, Dashratha wanted his guru Vasishtha to

find some suitable muhurtas for that function. It was on the advice

of Bhagwan Vasishtha that Dasharatha decided to anoint the Yuvraja

the very next day, as it was ?Tishya? then. It is clear that either

Vasishtha Muni did not know as to what was going to happen to

Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as crown-prince or he kept

quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine

dispensation!

Obviously, being the son of Brahmaji and being a highly exalted yogi

as well as jnyani, Vasishtha-muni could peep into past as well as

future. It means that even if some exalted souls can foresee as to

what is going to happen, they do not reveal our ?bhavishya? before

hand, unlike the breed of astrologers of today, who masquerade as ?

Paasharas? and ?Vamadevas? to tell us even our past and future

janmas just by glancing at our birth-charts, even if those charts

are fundamentally incorrect.(BHARAT start)It is your notion that charts are fundamentally incorrect. Your notion that Astrologer is someone who has no knowledge of the Veda is also incorrect. If the " astrologer " does not understand the Vedas, he is likely to make many mistakes in his/her analysis. Vedas are supreme. Why are you even comparing Astrology to Vedas? One who understands - Isavasya Idam sarvam.... does not need Astrology. Astrology is for those who are pursuing the three purusharthas of Artha, Kama through Dharma and facing problems in the same. It is an attempt to help a person understand onself better. For the 4th purushartha of Moksha, astrology can help overcome some tendencies, but, nothing more. (BHARAT end)

 

5. Almost all the jyotishis suggest one or the other remedial

measure to their clients, and mostly these are in the form of

various gems. What is surprising is that we have become so

dimwitted that we forget our entire itihasa of our past!

 

(i) Why was Dasharatha not suggested some ?ruby? or ?

coral? to ward off the evil Dasha that was going to kill him when

Rama would leave for the forests?

Because our Rishis were not greedy to have claimed to cheat death by

just making him buy some gems!(BHARAT start)Dimwitted surely we have become, but, you have a nasty tendency of not including yourself amongst the dimwitted. King Dasharatha might have been decked up with jewels, we have no clue about the same. However, who says one can cheat death by using gemstones? Your imaginations must be running wild, as I haven't seen a single astrologer attempting to overcome death by wearing gemstones. Yes, astrologers give remedies and one such remedy is Mahamritunjya Mantra. Taken from Rudram in the Veda, it is a potent mantra and protects the individual from early death and accidents. It does not attempt to cheat death. It is to protect from accidents, crippling incidents, etc. This is for the physical plane. The real meaning of this mantra as powerful as many verses of the Upanishads. It is the Veda that has given us the statement - Om purnamadah purnamidam..... ..it is the Veda that has given the statement - Isavasya idam sarvam.... ...Tat Twam Asi.... Aham Brahmasmi....which proves that all this is existing is nothing but Brahman. Therefore, your ridiculing a gemstone is ridiculing the Brahman itself. Why will a gemstone not have an effect? If there are researchers who work hard towards finding the connection between the effects of gemstones and human body, why does it hurt you? I guess you forgot to include yourself amongst the dimwitted.

(BHARAT end)

 

(ii) Bhagwan Krishna was born in a prison --- I wonder why He

could not use some ?sapphire? to take birth in a palace!(BHARAT start)The birth of individual consciousness always happens in a dark cave seeking an escape from the darkness. There is a huge symbolism here that you have neither strived to study or to seek help from spiritual gaints of India. Instead of studying Vedas and Puranas under a Guru, you tried to make your own meanings. The essence of the Vedas is Vedanta. The upanishads are collectively called Vedanta. Bhagwan Veda Vyasa (Bhadrayana) compiled the Vedas and wrote Brahma Sutras to help extract the real meaning of Vedanta. He further wrote the Mahabharata, perhaps for bringing out the Srimad Bhagawat Gita as a commentary upon the upanishads. Some statements of Bhagwan Krishna in Bhagwad Gita are directly from the Upanishads. Further, Prabhu Veda Vyaasa wrote the Puranas to explain Vedanta in a symbolic story form. From one Purana, you have taken the above mentioned incident and tried to apply it against gemstones. Grand is your intellect I must say. This I must say means - that you have no clue about Puranas nor about gemstones and you are trying to guide people against both. (BHARAT end)

 

(iii)Vasudeva and Devaki---the parents of Bhagwan Krishna--- were in

chains when He was born! It is said that Lord Krishna was a

complete ? 16 kala sampoorna --- divine incarnation of Vishnu and

was thus really Omnipotent, Omnipresent and Omniscient! He could

loosen the chains of His mother as well as father while taking birth

in a prison! He could make all the guards of Kansa?s prison fall

asleep while being taken out of prison by Vasudeva! He demonstrated

His Omnipotence by making Yamuna recede while Vasudeva was carrying

Him to Gokul from Mathura! He guided Vasudeva on his way back from

Gokul to Mathura in a dark night full of torrential rains and

storms! The guards remained asleep till Vasudeva entered the prison

after bringing Yogamaya from Mathura with him! It all shows that

Krishna was really Omnipotent!But then the moment Vasudeva was back in prison, his fetters were

 

 

again gridlocked automatically! Same was the case with Devaki! Both

Devaki and Vasudeva remained in fetters till Kansa was killed by

Krishna!

What does it demonstrate? Just the fact that if the Omniscient,

Omnipresent and Omnipotent Krishna could not ameliorate the miseries

of His own father or mother before the appointed time, how can a

ruby or a sapphire---or some Mangala or Shani yagya--- remove all

our miseries or give us a Union Minister?s seat!

Obviously, we are being taken for a ride by such Jyotishis! (BHARAT start)Another fine example of your ignorance about the Puranas. The symbolic meaning is left and a completely nonsensical meaning has been taken out. I think as per you, Lord Krishna was born to prove the practice of gemstones wrong! Furthermore, you are yourself attacking the Puranas and then using their stories to support your arguments. Are you really a man of wisdom? (BHARAT end)

 

Then not in the distant past, Smti Indira Gandhi would run after

astrologers for knowing her future. She had a rare and original

ekamukhi rudraksha, which only either the Maharaja of Nepal had or

she was wearing! It is said that some top-notch jyotishis had

suggested that rudraksha to her! Ironically, both the King of Nepal

as well Mrs. Indira Gandhi were assassinated ?by the people? they ?

had trusted? ekamukhi rudraksha not withstanding! (BHARAT start)We have no clue or proof that she was wearing one or not. We have no confirmation whether King of Nepal was wearing one or not. Without any proof, by hearing make belief stories, are you not practicing superstition yourself. Using your own superstitions, you are talking against them. This only shows your dual nature. It is this nature I bought out in my earlier discussions with you and you left the group. (BHARAT end)

 

What does it prove? That we should not be hoodwinked by soothsayers!

Then again a well known Tantrik of yore---highly respected by the

then PM--- is out on bail, not by dint of his ?Tantra-Kriya? but

because of some legal loopholes in FERA!(BHARAT start)A lot of people are corrupt in any field and that does not mean the entire subject is false.

(BHARAT end)

 

Dhirendra Brahmachari, another high profile ?Tantrik?, met with an

accident in the plane he was flying himself! If he could not seehis own death looming large how could he forewarn others!(BHARAT start)

I remember him as a Yoga teacher and a close confident of Smt. Indira Gandhi. Considering him as a Tantric for 5 minutes till you read my reply, if he forewarned people about problems and other issues, has he not served humanity and helped others? A person, who has no clue about the time of the death, cannot stop others from jumping into the well? This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. (BHARAT end)

 

6. The Gita is said to be the gist of all our shastras. When Arjuna

expressed his doubt about whether Pandavas would win or lose the

battle, Bhagwan Krishna neither asked him to consult some soothsayer

nor did He tell him to wear some ruby! On the other hand, He just

advised him to fight and either get killed on the battlefield and go

to heavens or win the battle to be the ruler of the entire earth!

What does that prove? Obviously, it warns us against relying on any

soothsayers, especially if they call themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?

since they are taking us for a ride literally.(BHARAT start)Wrong! Srimad Bhagawad Gita is not the gist of Shastras, but, a superlative explanation and commentary on the upanishads. Lord Krishna advised Arjuna to follow dharma on the battlefield. He advised him many different things at different times. The battlefield is not a place to wear a Ruby or to suggest one. I haven't seen any jyotishi running around in Dras and Batalik during the Kargil war, suggesting rubies to soldiers. Have you?(BHARAT end)

 

 

7. Yes, Bhagwan Ram did worship Shiva at the time of going to war at

Rameshwaram but that was not to please Mangal or Shani, but to show

respect to the divine trinity -- Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh---in

this case Vishnu worshipping Shiva!

Similarly, at the time of the Mahabharata war Arjuna was asked to

worship Maha-Shakti but not to please Rahu or Ketu but to gain

strength from his own ATMA-Shakti, in the form of Divine Shakti!

The Gita is very clear ?ye yatha mam prapadyante tanstathaiva

bajameaham? --- ?I will

?worship? you in whatever way you worship Me?.(BHARAT start)

Mahashakti or Adi shakti is the entirety. It isn't different from Shiva. When that is the case, what is wrong in pleasing Rahu and Ketu... the essence of Mahashakti runs through them too. Lord may be worshipped in any form or without form, for all is lord. People tend to worship any deity as per their own devotion. Some do it in meditation, some in temples, some to the trees, some to the animals. What is your problem in the same?

Can you directly worship the lord without form, without thought, etc? - If you can, please go ahead. I'd love to see it.(BHARAT end)

 

8. There is no mention of any Rishi like Vasishtha or Garga or

Brighu ever having written any works of predictive astrology

in any of the Puranas. The Vishnu Purana by Parasharis is full of

astronomical references ---and that also sayana i.e. the seasonal

year when Mesha sankranti is another name of Spring Equinox and so

on, but we do not find any mention of any Brihat Parasharis Hora

Shastra there! Obviously, it is the worst concoction that can ever

be had, and that is why it is the bible of ?Vedic astrologers?(BHARAT start)Provide the references that you have read. You already had a discussion with Sri Sreenadh regarding Sayana and Nirayana. Kindly refer the same, rather than harping on the same issue with same words again and again.

(BHARAT end)

 

9. In India, we have started going downhill ever since our rulers

started runningafter Jyotishis. In ancient days, during the time of

Mahabharata, it was a dharma yudha that we had to fight against our

own Duryodhanas but ever since the advent of astrology before the

invasion of Alexander the Great, and with him the ?Yavana Jatakam?

of Sphujidwaja and the Surya Sidhanta of Maya the Yavana

(mlechha!), we had to fight outsiders! The more the outsiders

invaded us the more our rulers started consulting soothsayers whom

they called Rajyajyotishis! (In those days jyotishis did not dare

to call themselves Vedic Jyotishis since the general public was not

then that illiterate about the Vedic principles as they are thee

days, thanks to Vedic Jyotishis!)(BHARAT start)

Can you provide proof that " we " started going downhill ever since our rulers ran after Jyotishis? The fact is the declaration of Independence was done by consulting a Jyotishi. We are no way going down as a nation. Our neighbouring nation is surely going down without consulting a Vedic Astrologer. I am sure you have silly imaginations here and no facts. Moreover, your unsaid suggestion that Vedic Astrologers attempt to rectify things without bringing internal change in a person, are totally unfounded. Are you really clear about Astrology? Do you have any idea about Karma? Your suggestions are really saying that you aren't even remotely clear about basic concepts. (BHARAT end)

 

10. These monarchs wanted to know if at all their horoscopes

indicated whether they would win or lose and for winning the

battles, instead of making military preparations they just started

wearing rubies and diamonds to ward off evil spirits!(BHARAT start)Carry on with your ramblings.

(BHARAT end)

 

11. The maximum credit for creating such a fear of omens and

ghosts and ghouls and storms and even clouds goes to

Varahamihira! It appears he later reincarnated as N. C. Lahiri

since both of them had their own axes to grind -- the former wanted

to make his Brihatsamhita/Brihat Jatakam and Panchasidhantika world

famous and the latter wanted to sell the maximum copies of his

Bangla Vishudha Sidhanta Panjika and ?Lahiri?s Indian Ephemeris??.

Before venturing into the battlefield, these monarchs would ask

their soothsayer to prepare ?narpati jaya charya? and consult Brihat

Samhita etc. to see whether the ?ketuchara? was favorable at that

time or not! No wonder with such a preliminary and hopeless

knowledge of astronomical facts, we were being pushed back into dark

ages by these jyotishis!

 

12. Our historical records are witness to the fact that we were

vanquished in every battle whether it was with Alexander the

Great or Chengiz Khan or Muhamud of Gazni or Nadir Shah or the

Moguls or finally the East India Company, thanks to the dependence

of our monarchs on soothsayers (Rajajyotishis, huh!) instead of the

principles of war strategy and statecraft as adumbrated by Chanakya,

who chided the kings for consulting soothsayers!(BHARAT start)I thought that it was because people and kings were selfish and divided and that is why they fell to such invaders. Whenever we were united, we triumphed. This is news to me that Astrologers were involved. I am really having a nice laugh here now. (BHARAT end)

 

12. The fate of BJP has not been any better than that of our earlier

monarchs by depending more on their ?Vedic Jyotishis? who were

responsible for getting ?Vedic Jyotisha (sic!)? prescribed in Indian

Universities! It is that very move that boomeranged on the party

and even the ?Minister of astrology? did not even win his own

parliamentary seat, let alone being the Union Minister again, lest

these ?Vedic jyotishis? continued to perpetuate Adharma in the guise

of ?Vedic Jyotisha?! Do you need any other proofs of the fact that

these ?Vedic Jyotishis? are really a scourge who will make you lose

your seat of power just by making you advance your elections?

13. If we continue to follow the trend of our ?monarchs? of having

blind faith in our soothsayers, there is no doubt that sooner than

later we will become yesteryears? Babylon, which is known as Iraq

these days!

14. It was priest class i.e. Brahmins the most respected community

with whom the secrets of predictive gimmicks were supposed to

rest! Just see the plight of the Brahmin community these days!

They age treated worse than any OBC in case of government jobs and

other quotas! Why so? Simply because they lost their dharma by

being nakshatra jeevis, caring two hoots for the admonishments of

the Manu! No wonder they ? the Brahmins are not fit for being

consulted in any sabha of scholars!

(BHARAT start)Glad to see you are out of Nakshatra jeevis stranghold. Congratulations. Enjoy your freedom. The same lord who has given you a choice has given me a choice to do as I so wish. I do not see any stronghold, nor do I see Astrologers pumping out the Vedanta knowledge out of me (whatever there is).

(BHARAT end) 15. I must put on record that as a Kashmiri Pandit, I have more

 

to blame predictive gimmicks and soothsayers, including the

panchanga makers, than anything or anybody else since they never ?

forearmed? (their pet dialogue is ?forewarned is forearmed!)us about

any calamities that were going to befall us! On the other hand,

just to prove their astrological gimmicks, they just made ---and are

still making --- us celebrate all our festivals, including

Mahashivaratri on wrong days. It is these very jyotishis, whom we

had treated as our friends, philosophers and guides, who are

responsible for our downfall as Kahsmiri Pandits, since they proved

neither our friends, nor philosophers least of all our guides!

These Panchanga makers/jyotishis were the first to flee from

Kashmir --- like the king Hari Sigh at the time of Pakistani raid

in 1948 (hope he had consulted his ?rajajyotishi? to decide the

muhurtas for taking the last flight to Jammu/Mumbai)----since they

had already

made their alternate homes in safer places like Jammu and Delhi

They just proved to be Shylocks, who were only interested in their

Pound of flesh by way of Dakshinas for janmapatris and panchangas

and matching of horoscopes -- all cheating and nothing else!

16. These soothsayers have such a hypnotic grip on us that

initially even I was brain washed to believe that the Vedas had

nothing else to tell us excepting teaching us predictive astrology!

I was also so convinced that it appeared that even the principle of

Secondary Progressions must have been exported from India to Western

countries since the principle of ?A day equals a year? was mentioned

in our Vedas!(BHARAT start)

Why only as a Kashmiri Pundit? You can blame anything even without being a Kashmiri Pundit. That is your very nature. Why bring disrepute to the lovely and knowledgeable Kashmiri Pundit community? Considering what you say is right for 20 seconds, then, I must say your approach to bring change in others is totally unlike Sri Krishna and Sri Chanakya. I guess you yourself haven't learnt any lessons from them.

(BHARAT end)

 

17. However, there are neither rashis like Mesha etc. nor planets

like Mangal, Shani etc.

in the Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmanas etc. etc. Similarly, Vedanga

Jyotisha, as has been made clear several times already, is an

astronomical work of 14th century BCE and tells us as to how to

calculate mean tithi, nakshatra and Uttarayana-cum-Tapah-cum Magha

etc. months. It does not list any rashis nor any planets like

Mangal, Budha etc. Same is the case with Yajur Jyotisha of about

11th century BCE and later Atharva Jyotisha of about 5th century

BCE. As such, it is really a fraud on the Vedas being played by

some charlatans to call any predictive gimmicks as Vedic astrology

and hail themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?. It is equally a crime under

Consumer Protection Act since it is a misrepresentation of facts to

a client and is thus a deficiency in service.(BHARAT start)Predictive Jyotish is a by product of Jyotish Vedanga. Jyotish as a Vedanga has a role to fulfill as an aid to the Vedas. Its aid is a little different than that of Vyakarana and other Vedangas. Astrology can be a source of spiritual

guidance. In Hindu or vedic astrology, planets are called "grahas". The

meaning of a graha is "to seize". In other words, they seize us into

their web and lend reality to thoughts and desires. Their nature,

position, association, aspect, etc. determine the nature of thoughts

and desires and possible actions. They represent the misinterpretation

of the Reality. Give the above, astrology can be used to find

out what thinking patterns, desires and expectations bind the

individual. One can analyze how the individual is caught up in the web

of "Maya". If we see, different grahas (planets) give the following identifications within one self and consequent binding:

Lagna: identification with the individuality in light of consciousness.

Moon: identification with the mind and

all the emotions arising there from: give rise to the multiplicity and

raises the pair of opposites. Mars: identification with ambition, power, conflict and desire.

Mercury:

identification with the intellect: takes one part of the Reality as

right and other as wrong and so on increases its identification. No

wonder it is the son of Moon.Jupiter: identification with the values, memory and society.

Venus: identification with beauty and physical aspects of nature. Saturn: identification with sorrow and pain and lends reality to the same.

Rahu-Ketu: identification with the future and the past, thus lending reality to the concept of time.

In this regard, Astrology, as practiced by Hindus, is Vedic contrary to many beliefs and arguments. (BHARAT end)

 

18.It is being said that Sir Isaac Newton believed in astrology!

That just is not possible! The astronomical ephemeredes, from

which horoscopes are made, were so incorrect that ?Horary Astrology?

by a world famous Western astrologer, William Lilly, of 17th

century, published by American Federation of Astrologers, has the

planetary positions of all the charts incorrect! He was a

contemporary of Sir Isaac Newton, and thus even if Newton had wanted

to believe in predictive astrology, he could never have done so

since the astronomical works of that period were fundamentally

incorrect as they were mostly based on Ptolemy?s Almagest!

In other words, the astronomical works of the West were hardly

better than the Surya Sidhanta or Aryabhati of India!

19.Similarly, Albert Einstein is supposed to have believed in

astrology! Dr. B. V. Raman has not said so anywhere in his ?world

famous? book ?Notable Horoscopes? while discussing the horoscope of

Einstein! Similarly, there has been no such indication in any of

the astrological magazines which normally jump on such hearsays to

encash them! It maybe mentioned here that even in the ?Notable

Horoscopes? hardly any chart even of the 20th century is correct,

leave alone the charts of Bhagwan Krishna or Gautama the Budha or

Shankaracharya! There is also a difference of heaven and earth in

the planetary longitudes of the same work in a consolidated form

given at pages 426 to 431 and the main charts given in the chart

form! Even the chart of the erstwhile editor of the Astrological

Magazine viz. Dr. B. V. Raman himself given at page No. 401 is

incorrect! And he was supposed to be the ?greatest Vedic astrologer?

of the twentieth century but surprisingly, could not calculate

even his own horoscope properly!

Same is the case with the chart No. 74, which is actually the

chart of the spouse of Dr. B. V. Raman! The planetary longitudes on

that page do not at all tally with the ones given at page 470 in the

same book!

And the delineations of all such charts are correct! In other

words, ?Vedic astrology? can make correct predictions only from

incorrect data!(BHARAT start)

No comments since I have no clue about Sri B. V. Raman's sayings or activities. I am no one to judge him or others and nor can comment upon other people having interest in Jyotish. I do not know if he or someone else was the greatest Jyotishi. I do not think we have contests amongst Vedic Astrologers to check who is the greatest? Is there an Olympics for Vedic Astrologers? In your mind perhaps. I understand your modus operandi. Call one person as the greatest Astrologer and then criticize him. Thereby, criticizing and rubbishing everyone. Very neatly done, I must say, but, it only reflects your narrow mindedness. (BHARAT end)20. We have demonstrated it practically through ?Mahesh? that it

 

is impossible for any astrological predictions to have been correct

in the past either based as they were on the data from the Surya

Sidhanta or Aryabhati or Brahma Sphuta Sidhanta or Sidhanta

Shiromani ----whether they were supposed to be so called nirayana or

so called sayana! But then may be that is the beauty of predictive

astrology -- whether ?Vedic? or ?not-so-Vedic? --- to make correct

predictions from incorrect data!

21. Predictive astrology is supposed to be a ?science?! What a

preposterous statement! When the data on which predictions were

based or are based these days are not correct, how can the results

be correct and how can we draw correct inferences when we have not

made correct observations at all!(BHARAT start)Read Below:

The Basics: Astrology in scientific termsAstrology relates itself to planets and to the two luminaries namely Sun and Moon. In modern science, we know, Sun is a star and is the prime mover and, therefore, secondary sources of energy depend upon its energy. Sun sends in its energy directly to the Earth and, also, as reflected energy from the Moon and other planets. This energy may be light, heat, magnetic, gravitational or any other that may be discovered by Scientists in the coming years. The fact of the matter is, the energy reaching Earth comes from the Sun and other planets both in direct and indirect ways. All events are energy driven. This statement comes from the scientific adage that every effect has a cause and that every happening has a force behind it. In other words, it is safe to understand that energy drives the events. If we were to understand the kind of energy that drives particular events then we have a formidable knowledge in our hands. This is exactly what the ancient Indians attempted. They divided the energy between planets and developed calculations to measure the contribution of energy from different planets. By studying the effects that the energy brings, repeatedly, the ancient Indians were able to correctly assess, what planetary energy meant for human life, natural habitat and our world in general. This gave them a tool to calculate the following:

Energy received at a particular time at any place on Earth.

The energy received from each planetThe quantum of conflicting and self canceling energy.

and likewise

Now it became easier to correlate any happening in any individual's life to the planetary system. Astrology is a discovery of natural phenomenon much as discovery of gravity or magnetism is.

Astrology & Astronomy

The calculation of planetary longitudes and their motion is vital to their placement in astrological charts. Astrology takes the reference as Earth and it measures the movement of planets with reference to earth. Further, it divides the sky into 12 equal parts called signs and 27 equal parts known as constellations. This is to categorize the nature of various parts of our sky through distant stars and constellations. All of the above calculations are nothing but astronomy. It is only when we try to correlate the astronomy with its effects do we bring in additional observational data and call it Astrology. In other words, a rudimentary definition of Astrology, would be – a study of correlation of cosmic forces with life and natural phenomenon. Astrology isn't a set of beliefs and superstitions. It is observation, experimentation and categorization of cause and effects. Both in its study and its application, it resembles pure science.

Why Astrology isn't always replicable?

Many scientists have a simple query against the astrologers – If astrology is a science then its principles must be replicable? In Science, a discovery is made a natural law if the same phenomenon is replicable given the same conditions. Let us understand this with a small example of rain. Rain cannot happen without clouds. This is the law but this kind of suggests that whenever clouds are present rain occurs. We all know this isn't true. The correct replicable law is that for rain to happen not only the clouds have to be present, but, they have to be so full of moisture that they cannot hold it any longer. This is replicable but not always. Anywhere in the tropical world the clouds cannot hold moisture then it rains. In the Tundra regions, however, this law does not hold true. There instead of rain the moisture might fall as snow. So the law of rain is changed again to hold true for some regions. In Astrology, many astrologers are presently engaged in showing replicable results to the world. They are doing commendable work but here we would like to give reasons why astrology and its laws are not always replicable.

Astrology measures the energy at any given point of an event and then discusses the likely events that are possible in the future in the space time continuum consequent to this event. Each event itself is a cause to a variety of possibilities. It is, therefore, possible to predict the variety of possibilities but very difficult to predict the exact future event. The events that one faces in life are called destiny. With each event or situation, an individual has a choice:

To react to the situation in many different ways.

To accept the situation and be proactive.

To accept the situation and do nothing. Upon the choice of the individual the possibilities of the future events hang. As individual choices can be many the likelihood of the event happening in the future changes. This change in probability is born out of a simple understanding of science of human nature. The more the humans are non-reactive to their destiny the harder it will be to determine the happenings likely to occur in their future. This may represent only 1% of the total humanity yet it cannot be treated as an exception. Astrology therefore is, for the very scientific reasons it upholds, not replicable, always.

End of Article(BHARAT end)

 

 

22. It is said that stars affect us! It appears either these

astrologers have gone honkers themselves or they suppose that all

the world has really gone mad! Let us see how:

I am a tiny human being on this small planet called earth. The sun

is hundreds of thousands of times larger than the earth! And there

are other stars of our nakshatra/rashichakra that are supposed to

affect me individually as per the Dasha-Bhukti that is running in my

horoscope! However, this fantastic statement has no leg to stand

upon since the nearest star of that Rashichakra is Alpha Aquilae

which is known as Shravana in Sanskrit! And do you know its distance

from me? It is seventeen light years! And it is several times

larger than our sun! In other words, if that star wants to ?affect?

me individually, it will take it at least seventeen years to do so

even if that ?effect? travels at the speed of light! And by then,

my Rahu or Shani or whatever Dasha it may be must have been over!

Then how can such a star which is trillions of times larger than me

send its rays in a concentrated from just to haunt me at a

particular point of time! Can you imagine what type of laughing

stocks we are making of ourselves by believing in such hocus pocus!

Similarly, the next nearest star of our Rashichakra is Alpha Bootis

known as Swati in Sanskrit! It is away by 26 light years from me

and is again several times larger than our sun!!

It thus defies imagination as to how a scientist like Albert

Einstein could have made a statement like ?stars affect us?! I m

sure he could not have been cowed down by the special ?aura? or ?

halo? which these ?Jyotishis? are supposed to have since that is

only to befool simpletons like ignorant adivasis!

Secondly, by quoting Newton and Einstein, these ?Vedic Jyotishis?

are themselves proving that they have no common sense at all! If at

all these two scientists did claim to believe in astrology, they

would have believed in Western system since there was no ?Vedic

Jyotish? around those days! And these two systems are just

antitheses to one another ? they cannot be integrated at any point

of time since if my sayana moon is in Vrisha, my nirayana moon is in

Mesha and so on! Similarly, there are no Dasha bhuktis in the

Western system nor is there any Sade-Sati etc. Thus whatever

support they try to muster for their preposterous claims goes in

fact against the very grain of their own arguments!

(BHARAT start)If light from our Earth travels to another Nakshatra in 17 years and carries with it the information of the people here, and comes back from there back to Earth in 17 years. That means the past event of 34 years back affects us. This is wonderful. Can you list all the times, it can be an aid in our study? This can be a nice topic of research. (BHARAT end)

 

23. It is being said that quite a few Western ?Vamadevas? and

other ?Rishis? have started believing in ?Vedic Jyotish?. We

must not forget that Westerners like their Eastern counter-parts are

interested in earning a few bucks the quickest way! Just by reading

a few books by Dr. B. V. Raman or K. N. Rao etc. etc. and the much

touted ?Brihat Parashara Hora Shastram? they can declare themselves

as qualified ?Vedic astrologers? It is immaterial if they cannot

pronounce even the words of shantipath like ?poornam adah poornam

idam? properly or correctly, leave alone understanding their

meaning, but then we have become so blind because of greed and

avarice that we just let them masquerade as ?Vamadevas? and ?

Parasharas?. This can happen only with Hindu religion, which we are

supposed to defend! Why don?t these ?Vamadevas? proclaim themselves

to be re-incarnations of Jesus Christ or St. Paul or St. John and so

on! We have already a glut of so many incarnations like Radha

and Dattatreya and so on and so forth that we hardly need imported

Vamadevas! Thus instead of preserving our cultural integrity, we are

appreciating the efforts of ?Vedic Jyotishi East India Company? to

help us disintegrate our own culture by propagating some non-sense

called ?Vedic Jyotish? in overseas countries as well as in India.

I do not know how many times I will have to repeat it that

predictive gimmicks are against the letter as well as spirit of the

Vedas, Puranas, Itihasas and Smritis and therefore, have to be

shunned at the earliest! And naturally, these imported ?Vamadevas?

are just jugglers who have no other motives but to make fools of us

and make us deviate from our cultural heritage, pretending as if

they are propagating it!

24.I have yet to receive any response to my challenge to all these

jyotishis to quote even a single reference from any of our shastras

which has advised us to marry only after matching horoscopes! Leave

alone shastras, they cannot quote anything even from their own ?

Jyotisha bibles?. What type of experts are these ?Vamadevas? and ?

Parasharas? and ?Varahamihiras? if they cannot vindicate their

statements/stands even by a single shastric text?

Do you need any other proofs to understand that you are really being

made a fool by these jyotishis?

The last nail in the coffin of astrological gimmicks is the chart

for the new lunar year! It has been proved by me already quoting

all the relevant Vedas and shastras that the current lunar New Year

started on February 28, 2006, with the topocentric New Moon for

Delhi at exactly 5hrs 0mts IST. But then all the vernacular papers,

apart from astrological magazines, are making predictions for the

new year on the basis of a lunar New Year supposed to start from

March 30, 2006, with the chart for New Moon being prepared for 15hrs

45 mts. IST on March 29, 2006. In fact that is the time of

Geocentric New Moon for an imaginary ?centre of the earth? whereas

the actual time of topocentric New Moon for Delhi on that date is

17hrs 26 mts. IST!

You can see it for yourself that not only is the very date of the

New Year chart for a wrong date ? March 29 instead of February 28,

but even the timing of erecting that chart is based on a geocentric

New Moon instead of the New Moon with parallax corrections for

Delhi, which is known as topocentric phenomenon!

But then, as usual, these jyotishis will claim to have made correct

predictions for our ?matribhoomi? i.e. Bharatavarsha since, even at

the cost of repeating a statement for the umpteenth time, these

Vedic jyotishis can make correct predictions only from fundamentally

incorrect data!

In view of the above discussion, it is clear that predictive

gimmicks have no basis either as per the shastras or modern

sciences. It is immaterial whether these predictive techniques are

of Indian system ? euphemistically known as ?Vedic Jyotisha? or

Western system. On the other hand, the so called Vedic Jyotisha has

made us celebrate all our festivals on wrong days and the earlier we

shun it the better so that we can start using a seasonal year for

deciding our fasts, fairs, festivals and muhurtas.

When are you going to do that?

(BHARAT start)I am so sorry, I replied to your entire email! Do not expect me to do again, especially with your attitude. Try not to reply back with some more nonsensical stuff. I just replied for the sake my fellow friends and Vedic Astrologers.If your purpose is only to correct the Ayanamsha or to erase it, please talk to the relevant people. You can take it up with the government of India or someone else. You are free not to be an astrologer and especially not a Vedic one. I shall call Astrology Vedic, much to your dislike perhaps. Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

With kind regards,

Avtar Krishen Kaul

PS. For complete details and a free program to calculate planetary

data from 10001 BC to 12030 AD, please log on to:

HinduCalendar

 

 

 

 

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Shri Kaul,

 

Well - I am neither Sanskrit scholar nor a hisotrian. But how does it matter -

if for the sake of assumption that - Jyotish in not originated from Vedas. Shri

Bharat has explained it quite well on its origin.

 

Even if it is not originated from veda, and if it is working (just like so many

new technologies) well; We can still read / learn / apply it for the benefit of

human race and native. Yes - astrologers in general, must spend energies in

making best use of the technology and knowledge base.

 

Even if history confirms many of jyotish principle induction from Greek

astrology (or anywhere else) - owning it to our culture is not the crisis issue.

The key is to make sure that - it works on consistent basis, in the limited life

span of an astrologer.

 

regards / Prafulla Gang

http://www.prafulla.net

 

Reason makes mistakes, Conscience never does

************************************************

 

 

>

> hinduastrology

> Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:49:43 +0530

>

> Re: Fwd: Response by Prof Saraswat to

> the article on " Vedic Astrology " - the greatest fraud on the Vedas! by

> Avtar Krishen Kaul

>

> Namaskaar Friends,

>

> Below is my simple reply to Sri Avtar Kishen Kaul, who has been harping

> about Astrology not being Vedic. I have replied but only for the

> information

> of my Vedic Astrology friends. My reply to him is in Blue color.

>

>> 1. Whether Indian or Western, no system of predictions has any

>> sanction either from the Vedas or even Puranas least of all our

>> dharmashastras etc.

>>

(BHARAT start)

> I see you have a wrong meaning of Vedic Astrology. Predictions isn't

> Vedic

> Astrology. Indications are. The fundamental cause and effect relationship

> exists and that is what is to be indicated for a said karma. Kindly read

> the

> following:

>

> Vedanga refers to those bodies of knowledge that are the " limbs " to the

> Vedas. In other words, it aids in understanding of the Vedas.

>

> It would be important to understand what Vedas are. The word " Veda " means

> knowledge. Vedas contain aphorisms to understand the true identity of

> ourselves. Many people think Vedas are part of Hindu Religion. It would

> correct to say that Hindu Religion has adopted itself from the Vedas.

> Vedas

> are universal and came before the word " Hindu " came into being.

>

> Jyotish is a Vedanga and in its approach it follows the Vedic teaching.

> Jyotish cannot go against the Vedas in its teaching or analysis.

>

> Jyotish follows the principle of freedom of choice. It gives individuals

> the

> right to choose in any given situation. The choices always available to

> an

> individual in any given situation of life are:

>

> 1. To react (anger, jealousy, envy, fear, fight, arrogance, likes,

> dislikes,

> etc.)

> 2. To pro act (do one's action as required by the call of duty, without

> involving oneself in the above reactions).

> 3. Remain calm without any action (Realizing the results are given by the

> lord, and accepting them without any reaction)

>

> The 2nd choice has all the elements of the 3rd choice. Jyotish as a

> subject

> never undermines these choices. With these choices, one can change one's

> future. With the first choice, one can enhance the difficulties in one's

> destiny and with, the second and third choice; one can enhance the

> quality

> of destiny in happiness and success. Each time you make the 2nd or 3rd

> choice, you weaken the reactions within yourself. Over a period of time,

> you

> stop reacting at all. Jyotish understands this principle and employs it.

>

> Jyotish never promises a pre destined life. Mother, father, brother,

> sister

> may be predestined but not your future. Your future depends upon the

> choices.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 2. All our shastras admonish us from consulting ?nakshatra

>> jeevis? so much so that the Manusmriti calls these nakshatrajeevis

>> as outcastes and not fit to sit in any sabha of learned people.

>(BHARAT start)

> Manu smriti also talks a lot about treatment of women, etc. I am sure you

> do

> not follow the same.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 3. The Manusmriti advises that ?The king must keep a watch on his

>> kingdom like a heron and act with prowess like a lion? --- nowhere

>> has he advised to consult some soothsayer before undertaking any

>> activity!

>>

(BHARAT start)

> People do quote from books that they themselves do not follow, just to

> drill

> a point. I take it that you did the same.

> (BHARAT end)

>

>

>> 4. All the Ramayanas, whether Valmiki or Adhyatma or

>> Ramacharitamanasa etc. etc. say that before deciding about the

>> coronation of Bhagwan Rama, Dashratha wanted his guru Vasishtha to

>> find some suitable muhurtas for that function. It was on the advice

>> of Bhagwan Vasishtha that Dasharatha decided to anoint the Yuvraja

>> the very next day, as it was ?Tishya? then. It is clear that either

>> Vasishtha Muni did not know as to what was going to happen to

>> Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as crown-prince or he kept

>> quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine

>> dispensation!

>> Obviously, being the son of Brahmaji and being a highly exalted yogi

>> as well as jnyani, Vasishtha-muni could peep into past as well as

>> future. It means that even if some exalted souls can foresee as to

>> what is going to happen, they do not reveal our ?bhavishya? before

>> hand, unlike the breed of astrologers of today, who masquerade as ?

>> Paasharas? and ?Vamadevas? to tell us even our past and future

>> janmas just by glancing at our birth-charts, even if those charts

>> are fundamentally incorrect.

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> It is your notion that charts are fundamentally incorrect. Your notion

> that

> Astrologer is someone who has no knowledge of the Veda is also incorrect.

> If

> the " astrologer " does not understand the Vedas, he is likely to make many

> mistakes in his/her analysis. Vedas are supreme. Why are you even

> comparing

> Astrology to Vedas?

>

> One who understands - Isavasya Idam sarvam.... does not need Astrology.

> Astrology is for those who are pursuing the three purusharthas of Artha,

> Kama through Dharma and facing problems in the same. It is an attempt to

> help a person understand onself better. For the 4th purushartha of

> Moksha,

> astrology can help overcome some tendencies, but, nothing more.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 5. Almost all the jyotishis suggest one or the other remedial

>> measure to their clients, and mostly these are in the form of

>> various gems. What is surprising is that we have become so

>> dimwitted that we forget our entire itihasa of our past!

>>

> (i) Why was Dasharatha not suggested some ?ruby? or ?

>> coral? to ward off the evil Dasha that was going to kill him when

>> Rama would leave for the forests?

>> Because our Rishis were not greedy to have claimed to cheat death by

>> just making him buy some gems!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Dimwitted surely we have become, but, you have a nasty tendency of not

> including yourself amongst the dimwitted. King Dasharatha might have been

> decked up with jewels, we have no clue about the same. However, who says

> one

> can cheat death by using gemstones? Your imaginations must be running

> wild,

> as I haven't seen a single astrologer attempting to overcome death by

> wearing gemstones.

>

>

> Yes, astrologers give remedies and one such remedy is Mahamritunjya

> Mantra.

> Taken from Rudram in the Veda, it is a potent mantra and protects the

> individual from early death and accidents. It does not attempt to cheat

> death. It is to protect from accidents, crippling incidents, etc. This is

> for the physical plane. The real meaning of this mantra as powerful as

> many

> verses of the Upanishads.

>

> It is the Veda that has given us the statement - Om purnamadah

> purnamidam..... ..it is the Veda that has given the statement - Isavasya

> idam sarvam.... ...Tat Twam Asi.... Aham Brahmasmi....which proves that

> all

> this is existing is nothing but Brahman. Therefore, your ridiculing a

> gemstone is ridiculing the Brahman itself. Why will a gemstone not have

> an

> effect?

>

> If there are researchers who work hard towards finding the connection

> between the effects of gemstones and human body, why does it hurt you? I

> guess you forgot to include yourself amongst the dimwitted.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> (ii) Bhagwan Krishna was born in a prison --- I wonder why He

>> could not use some ?sapphire? to take birth in a palace!

>>

>

>

>

>

> (BHARAT start)

> The birth of individual consciousness always happens in a dark cave

> seeking

> an escape from the darkness. There is a huge symbolism here that you have

> neither strived to study or to seek help from spiritual gaints of India.

> Instead of studying Vedas and Puranas under a Guru, you tried to make

> your

> own meanings.

>

> The essence of the Vedas is Vedanta. The upanishads are collectively

> called

> Vedanta. Bhagwan Veda Vyasa (Bhadrayana) compiled the Vedas and wrote

> Brahma

> Sutras to help extract the real meaning of Vedanta. He further wrote the

> Mahabharata, perhaps for bringing out the Srimad Bhagawat Gita as a

> commentary upon the upanishads. Some statements of Bhagwan Krishna in

> Bhagwad Gita are directly from the Upanishads. Further, Prabhu Veda

> Vyaasa

> wrote the Puranas to explain Vedanta in a symbolic story form.

>

> From one Purana, you have taken the above mentioned incident and tried to

> apply it against gemstones. Grand is your intellect I must say. This I

> must

> say means - that you have no clue about Puranas nor about gemstones and

> you

> are trying to guide people against both.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> (iii)Vasudeva and Devaki---the parents of Bhagwan Krishna--- were in

>> chains when He was born! It is said that Lord Krishna was a

>> complete ? 16 kala sampoorna --- divine incarnation of Vishnu and

>> was thus really Omnipotent, Omnipresent and Omniscient! He could

>> loosen the chains of His mother as well as father while taking birth

>> in a prison! He could make all the guards of Kansa?s prison fall

>> asleep while being taken out of prison by Vasudeva! He demonstrated

>> His Omnipotence by making Yamuna recede while Vasudeva was carrying

>> Him to Gokul from Mathura! He guided Vasudeva on his way back from

>> Gokul to Mathura in a dark night full of torrential rains and

>> storms! The guards remained asleep till Vasudeva entered the prison

>> after bringing Yogamaya from Mathura with him! It all shows that

>> Krishna was really Omnipotent!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

But then the moment Vasudeva was back in prison, his fetters were

>

>> again gridlocked automatically! Same was the case with Devaki! Both

>> Devaki and Vasudeva remained in fetters till Kansa was killed by

>> Krishna!

>> What does it demonstrate? Just the fact that if the Omniscient,

>> Omnipresent and Omnipotent Krishna could not ameliorate the miseries

>> of His own father or mother before the appointed time, how can a

>> ruby or a sapphire---or some Mangala or Shani yagya--- remove all

>> our miseries or give us a Union Minister?s seat!

>> Obviously, we are being taken for a ride by such Jyotishis!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Another fine example of your ignorance about the Puranas. The symbolic

> meaning is left and a completely nonsensical meaning has been taken out.

> I

> think as per you, Lord Krishna was born to prove the practice of

> gemstones

> wrong!

>

> Furthermore, you are yourself attacking the Puranas and then using their

> stories to support your arguments. Are you really a man of wisdom?

> (BHARAT end)

>

>> Then not in the distant past, Smti Indira Gandhi would run after

>> astrologers for knowing her future. She had a rare and original

>> ekamukhi rudraksha, which only either the Maharaja of Nepal had or

>> she was wearing! It is said that some top-notch jyotishis had

>> suggested that rudraksha to her! Ironically, both the King of Nepal

>> as well Mrs. Indira Gandhi were assassinated ?by the people? they ?

>> had trusted? ekamukhi rudraksha not withstanding!

>>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> We have no clue or proof that she was wearing one or not. We have no

> confirmation whether King of Nepal was wearing one or not. Without any

> proof, by hearing make belief stories, are you not practicing

> superstition

> yourself. Using your own superstitions, you are talking against them.

> This

> only shows your dual nature. It is this nature I bought out in my earlier

> discussions with you and you left the group.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> What does it prove? That we should not be hoodwinked by soothsayers!

>> Then again a well known Tantrik of yore---highly respected by the

>> then PM--- is out on bail, not by dint of his ?Tantra-Kriya? but

>> because of some legal loopholes in FERA!

>>

(BHARAT start)

> A lot of people are corrupt in any field and that does not mean the

> entire

> subject is false.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> Dhirendra Brahmachari, another high profile ?Tantrik?, met with an

>> accident in the plane he was flying himself! If he could not see

>> his own death looming large how could he forewarn others!

>(BHARAT start)

> I remember him as a Yoga teacher and a close confident of Smt. Indira

> Gandhi.

>

> Considering him as a Tantric for 5 minutes till you read my reply, if he

> forewarned people about problems and other issues, has he not served

> humanity and helped others? A person, who has no clue about the time of

> the

> death, cannot stop others from jumping into the well? This is the most

> ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 6. The Gita is said to be the gist of all our shastras. When Arjuna

>> expressed his doubt about whether Pandavas would win or lose the

>> battle, Bhagwan Krishna neither asked him to consult some soothsayer

>> nor did He tell him to wear some ruby! On the other hand, He just

>> advised him to fight and either get killed on the battlefield and go

>> to heavens or win the battle to be the ruler of the entire earth!

>> What does that prove? Obviously, it warns us against relying on any

>> soothsayers, especially if they call themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?

>> since they are taking us for a ride literally.

>>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Wrong! Srimad Bhagawad Gita is not the gist of Shastras, but, a

> superlative

> explanation and commentary on the upanishads. Lord Krishna advised Arjuna

> to

> follow dharma on the battlefield. He advised him many different things at

> different times.

>

> The battlefield is not a place to wear a Ruby or to suggest one. I

> haven't

> seen any jyotishi running around in Dras and Batalik during the Kargil

> war,

> suggesting rubies to soldiers. Have you?

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 7. Yes, Bhagwan Ram did worship Shiva at the time of going to war at

>> Rameshwaram but that was not to please Mangal or Shani, but to show

>> respect to the divine trinity -- Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh---in

>> this case Vishnu worshipping Shiva!

>> Similarly, at the time of the Mahabharata war Arjuna was asked to

>> worship Maha-Shakti but not to please Rahu or Ketu but to gain

>> strength from his own ATMA-Shakti, in the form of Divine Shakti!

>> The Gita is very clear ?ye yatha mam prapadyante tanstathaiva

>> bajameaham? --- ?I will

>> ?worship? you in whatever way you worship Me?.

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Mahashakti or Adi shakti is the entirety. It isn't different from Shiva.

> When that is the case, what is wrong in pleasing Rahu and Ketu... the

> essence of Mahashakti runs through them too. Lord may be worshipped in

> any

> form or without form, for all is lord.

>

> People tend to worship any deity as per their own devotion. Some do it in

> meditation, some in temples, some to the trees, some to the animals.

> What

> is your problem in the same?

>

> Can you directly worship the lord without form, without thought, etc? -

> If

> you can, please go ahead. I'd love to see it.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 8. There is no mention of any Rishi like Vasishtha or Garga or

>> Brighu ever having written any works of predictive astrology

>> in any of the Puranas. The Vishnu Purana by Parasharis is full of

>> astronomical references ---and that also sayana i.e. the seasonal

>> year when Mesha sankranti is another name of Spring Equinox and so

>> on, but we do not find any mention of any Brihat Parasharis Hora

>> Shastra there! Obviously, it is the worst concoction that can ever

>> be had, and that is why it is the bible of ?Vedic astrologers?

>>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Provide the references that you have read. You already had a discussion

> with

> Sri Sreenadh regarding Sayana and Nirayana. Kindly refer the same, rather

> than harping on the same issue with same words again and again.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 9. In India, we have started going downhill ever since our rulers

>> started runningafter Jyotishis. In ancient days, during the time of

>> Mahabharata, it was a dharma yudha that we had to fight against our

>> own Duryodhanas but ever since the advent of astrology before the

>> invasion of Alexander the Great, and with him the ?Yavana Jatakam?

>> of Sphujidwaja and the Surya Sidhanta of Maya the Yavana

>> (mlechha!), we had to fight outsiders! The more the outsiders

>> invaded us the more our rulers started consulting soothsayers whom

>> they called Rajyajyotishis! (In those days jyotishis did not dare

>> to call themselves Vedic Jyotishis since the general public was not

>> then that illiterate about the Vedic principles as they are thee

>> days, thanks to Vedic Jyotishis!)

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Can you provide proof that " we " started going downhill ever since our

> rulers

> ran after Jyotishis? The fact is the declaration of Independence was done

> by

> consulting a Jyotishi. We are no way going down as a nation. Our

> neighbouring nation is surely going down without consulting a Vedic

> Astrologer.

>

> I am sure you have silly imaginations here and no facts.

>

> Moreover, your unsaid suggestion that Vedic Astrologers attempt to

> rectify

> things without bringing internal change in a person, are totally

> unfounded.

> Are you really clear about Astrology? Do you have any idea about Karma?

> Your

> suggestions are really saying that you aren't even remotely clear about

> basic concepts.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 10. These monarchs wanted to know if at all their horoscopes

>> indicated whether they would win or lose and for winning the

>> battles, instead of making military preparations they just started

>> wearing rubies and diamonds to ward off evil spirits!

>>

(BHARAT start)

> Carry on with your ramblings.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 11. The maximum credit for creating such a fear of omens and

>> ghosts and ghouls and storms and even clouds goes to

>> Varahamihira! It appears he later reincarnated as N. C. Lahiri

>> since both of them had their own axes to grind -- the former wanted

>> to make his Brihatsamhita/Brihat Jatakam and Panchasidhantika world

>> famous and the latter wanted to sell the maximum copies of his

>> Bangla Vishudha Sidhanta Panjika and ?Lahiri?s Indian Ephemeris??.

>> Before venturing into the battlefield, these monarchs would ask

>> their soothsayer to prepare ?narpati jaya charya? and consult Brihat

>> Samhita etc. to see whether the ?ketuchara? was favorable at that

>> time or not! No wonder with such a preliminary and hopeless

>> knowledge of astronomical facts, we were being pushed back into dark

>> ages by these jyotishis!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

12. Our historical records are witness to the fact that we were

>> vanquished in every battle whether it was with Alexander the

>> Great or Chengiz Khan or Muhamud of Gazni or Nadir Shah or the

>> Moguls or finally the East India Company, thanks to the dependence

>> of our monarchs on soothsayers (Rajajyotishis, huh!) instead of the

>> principles of war strategy and statecraft as adumbrated by Chanakya,

>> who chided the kings for consulting soothsayers!

>>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> I thought that it was because people and kings were selfish and divided

> and

> that is why they fell to such invaders. Whenever we were united, we

> triumphed. This is news to me that Astrologers were involved. I am really

> having a nice laugh here now.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 12. The fate of BJP has not been any better than that of our earlier

>> monarchs by depending more on their ?Vedic Jyotishis? who were

>> responsible for getting ?Vedic Jyotisha (sic!)? prescribed in Indian

>> Universities! It is that very move that boomeranged on the party

>> and even the ?Minister of astrology? did not even win his own

>> parliamentary seat, let alone being the Union Minister again, lest

>> these ?Vedic jyotishis? continued to perpetuate Adharma in the guise

>> of ?Vedic Jyotisha?! Do you need any other proofs of the fact that

>> these ?Vedic Jyotishis? are really a scourge who will make you lose

>> your seat of power just by making you advance your elections?

>> 13. If we continue to follow the trend of our ?monarchs? of having

>> blind faith in our soothsayers, there is no doubt that sooner than

>> later we will become yesteryears? Babylon, which is known as Iraq

>> these days!

>> 14. It was priest class i.e. Brahmins the most respected community

>> with whom the secrets of predictive gimmicks were supposed to

>> rest! Just see the plight of the Brahmin community these days!

>> They age treated worse than any OBC in case of government jobs and

>> other quotas! Why so? Simply because they lost their dharma by

>> being nakshatra jeevis, caring two hoots for the admonishments of

>> the Manu! No wonder they ? the Brahmins are not fit for being

>> consulted in any sabha of scholars!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Glad to see you are out of Nakshatra jeevis stranghold. Congratulations.

> Enjoy your freedom. The same lord who has given you a choice has given me

> a

> choice to do as I so wish. I do not see any stronghold, nor do I see

> Astrologers pumping out the Vedanta knowledge out of me (whatever there

> is).

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 15. I must put on record that as a Kashmiri Pandit, I have more

>

>> to blame predictive gimmicks and soothsayers, including the

>> panchanga makers, than anything or anybody else since they never ?

>> forearmed? (their pet dialogue is ?forewarned is forearmed!)us about

>> any calamities that were going to befall us! On the other hand,

>> just to prove their astrological gimmicks, they just made ---and are

>> still making --- us celebrate all our festivals, including

>> Mahashivaratri on wrong days. It is these very jyotishis, whom we

>> had treated as our friends, philosophers and guides, who are

>> responsible for our downfall as Kahsmiri Pandits, since they proved

>> neither our friends, nor philosophers least of all our guides!

>> These Panchanga makers/jyotishis were the first to flee from

>> Kashmir --- like the king Hari Sigh at the time of Pakistani raid

>> in 1948 (hope he had consulted his ?rajajyotishi? to decide the

>> muhurtas for taking the last flight to Jammu/Mumbai)----since they

>> had already

>> made their alternate homes in safer places like Jammu and Delhi

>> They just proved to be Shylocks, who were only interested in their

>> Pound of flesh by way of Dakshinas for janmapatris and panchangas

>> and matching of horoscopes -- all cheating and nothing else!

>> 16. These soothsayers have such a hypnotic grip on us that

>> initially even I was brain washed to believe that the Vedas had

>> nothing else to tell us excepting teaching us predictive astrology!

>> I was also so convinced that it appeared that even the principle of

>> Secondary Progressions must have been exported from India to Western

>> countries since the principle of ?A day equals a year? was mentioned

>> in our Vedas!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Why only as a Kashmiri Pundit? You can blame anything even without being

> a

> Kashmiri Pundit. That is your very nature. Why bring disrepute to the

> lovely

> and knowledgeable Kashmiri Pundit community?

>

> Considering what you say is right for 20 seconds, then, I must say your

> approach to bring change in others is totally unlike Sri Krishna and Sri

> Chanakya. I guess you yourself haven't learnt any lessons from them.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 17. However, there are neither rashis like Mesha etc. nor planets

>> like Mangal, Shani etc.

>> in the Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmanas etc. etc. Similarly, Vedanga

>> Jyotisha, as has been made clear several times already, is an

>> astronomical work of 14th century BCE and tells us as to how to

>> calculate mean tithi, nakshatra and Uttarayana-cum-Tapah-cum Magha

>> etc. months. It does not list any rashis nor any planets like

>> Mangal, Budha etc. Same is the case with Yajur Jyotisha of about

>> 11th century BCE and later Atharva Jyotisha of about 5th century

>> BCE. As such, it is really a fraud on the Vedas being played by

>> some charlatans to call any predictive gimmicks as Vedic astrology

>> and hail themselves ?Vedic Jyotishis?. It is equally a crime under

>> Consumer Protection Act since it is a misrepresentation of facts to

>> a client and is thus a deficiency in service.

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Predictive Jyotish is a by product of Jyotish Vedanga. Jyotish as a

> Vedanga

> has a role to fulfill as an aid to the Vedas. Its aid is a little

> different

> than that of Vyakarana and other Vedangas. Astrology can be a source of

> spiritual guidance. In Hindu or vedic astrology, planets are called

> " grahas " . The meaning of a graha is " to seize " . In other words, they

> seize

> us into their web and lend reality to thoughts and desires. Their nature,

> position, association, aspect, etc. determine the nature of thoughts and

> desires and possible actions. They represent the misinterpretation of the

> Reality.

>

> Give the above, astrology can be used to find out what thinking patterns,

> desires and expectations bind the individual. One can analyze how the

> individual is caught up in the web of " Maya " .

>

> If we see, different grahas (planets) give the following identifications

> within one self and consequent binding:

>

> Lagna: identification with the individuality in light of consciousness.

> Moon: identification with the mind and all the emotions arising there

> from:

> give rise to the multiplicity and raises the pair of opposites.

> Mars: identification with ambition, power, conflict and desire.

> Mercury: identification with the intellect: takes one part of the Reality

> as

> right and other as wrong and so on increases its identification. No

> wonder

> it is the son of Moon.

> Jupiter: identification with the values, memory and society.

> Venus: identification with beauty and physical aspects of nature.

> Saturn: identification with sorrow and pain and lends reality to the

> same.

> Rahu-Ketu: identification with the future and the past, thus lending

> reality

> to the concept of time.

>

> In this regard, Astrology, as practiced by Hindus, is Vedic contrary to

> many

> beliefs and arguments.

> (BHARAT end)

>>

>> 18.It is being said that Sir Isaac Newton believed in astrology!

>> That just is not possible! The astronomical ephemeredes, from

>> which horoscopes are made, were so incorrect that ?Horary Astrology?

>> by a world famous Western astrologer, William Lilly, of 17th

>> century, published by American Federation of Astrologers, has the

>> planetary positions of all the charts incorrect! He was a

>> contemporary of Sir Isaac Newton, and thus even if Newton had wanted

>> to believe in predictive astrology, he could never have done so

>> since the astronomical works of that period were fundamentally

>> incorrect as they were mostly based on Ptolemy?s Almagest!

>> In other words, the astronomical works of the West were hardly

>> better than the Surya Sidhanta or Aryabhati of India!

>> 19.Similarly, Albert Einstein is supposed to have believed in

>> astrology! Dr. B. V. Raman has not said so anywhere in his ?world

>> famous? book ?Notable Horoscopes? while discussing the horoscope of

>> Einstein! Similarly, there has been no such indication in any of

>> the astrological magazines which normally jump on such hearsays to

>> encash them! It maybe mentioned here that even in the ?Notable

>> Horoscopes? hardly any chart even of the 20th century is correct,

>> leave alone the charts of Bhagwan Krishna or Gautama the Budha or

>> Shankaracharya! There is also a difference of heaven and earth in

>> the planetary longitudes of the same work in a consolidated form

>> given at pages 426 to 431 and the main charts given in the chart

>> form! Even the chart of the erstwhile editor of the Astrological

>> Magazine viz. Dr. B. V. Raman himself given at page No. 401 is

>> incorrect! And he was supposed to be the ?greatest Vedic astrologer?

>> of the twentieth century but surprisingly, could not calculate

>> even his own horoscope properly!

>> Same is the case with the chart No. 74, which is actually the

>> chart of the spouse of Dr. B. V. Raman! The planetary longitudes on

>> that page do not at all tally with the ones given at page 470 in the

>> same book!

>> And the delineations of all such charts are correct! In other

>> words, ?Vedic astrology? can make correct predictions only from

>> incorrect data!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> No comments since I have no clue about Sri B. V. Raman's sayings or

> activities. I am no one to judge him or others and nor can comment upon

> other people having interest in Jyotish. I do not know if he or someone

> else

> was the greatest Jyotishi. I do not think we have contests amongst Vedic

> Astrologers to check who is the greatest?

>

> Is there an Olympics for Vedic Astrologers? In your mind perhaps.

>

> I understand your modus operandi. Call one person as the greatest

> Astrologer

> and then criticize him. Thereby, criticizing and rubbishing everyone.

> Very

> neatly done, I must say, but, it only reflects your narrow mindedness.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 20. We have demonstrated it practically through ?Mahesh? that it

>

>> is impossible for any astrological predictions to have been correct

>> in the past either based as they were on the data from the Surya

>> Sidhanta or Aryabhati or Brahma Sphuta Sidhanta or Sidhanta

>> Shiromani ----whether they were supposed to be so called nirayana or

>> so called sayana! But then may be that is the beauty of predictive

>> astrology -- whether ?Vedic? or ?not-so-Vedic? --- to make correct

>> predictions from incorrect data!

>> 21. Predictive astrology is supposed to be a ?science?! What a

>> preposterous statement! When the data on which predictions were

>> based or are based these days are not correct, how can the results

>> be correct and how can we draw correct inferences when we have not

>> made correct observations at all!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> Read Below:

>

> The Basics: Astrology in scientific terms

>

> Astrology relates itself to planets and to the two luminaries namely Sun

> and

> Moon. In modern science, we know, Sun is a star and is the prime mover

> and,

> therefore, secondary sources of energy depend upon its energy. Sun sends

> in

> its energy directly to the Earth and, also, as reflected energy from the

> Moon and other planets. This energy may be light, heat, magnetic,

> gravitational or any other that may be discovered by Scientists in the

> coming years. The fact of the matter is, the energy reaching Earth comes

> from the Sun and other planets both in direct and indirect ways.

>

> All events are energy driven. This statement comes from the scientific

> adage

> that every effect has a cause and that every happening has a force behind

> it. In other words, it is safe to understand that energy drives the

> events.

>

> If we were to understand the kind of energy that drives particular events

> then we have a formidable knowledge in our hands. This is exactly what

> the

> ancient Indians attempted. They divided the energy between planets and

> developed calculations to measure the contribution of energy from

> different

> planets. By studying the effects that the energy brings, repeatedly, the

> ancient Indians were able to correctly assess, what planetary energy

> meant

> for human life, natural habitat and our world in general. This gave them

> a

> tool to calculate the following:

>

>

> Energy received at a particular time at any place on Earth.

> The energy received from each planet

> The quantum of conflicting and self canceling energy.

>

>

> and likewise

>

> Now it became easier to correlate any happening in any individual's life

> to

> the planetary system. Astrology is a discovery of natural phenomenon

> much

> as discovery of gravity or magnetism is.

>

>

>

> Astrology & Astronomy

>

> The calculation of planetary longitudes and their motion is vital to

> their

> placement in astrological charts. Astrology takes the reference as Earth

> and

> it measures the movement of planets with reference to earth.

>

> Further, it divides the sky into 12 equal parts called signs and 27 equal

> parts known as constellations. This is to categorize the nature of

> various

> parts of our sky through distant stars and constellations.

>

> All of the above calculations are nothing but astronomy. It is only when

> we

> try to correlate the astronomy with its effects do we bring in additional

> observational data and call it Astrology. In other words, a rudimentary

> definition of Astrology, would be – a study of correlation of cosmic

> forces

> with life and natural phenomenon.

>

> Astrology isn't a set of beliefs and superstitions. It is observation,

> experimentation and categorization of cause and effects. Both in its

> study

> and its application, it resembles pure science.

>

>

> Why Astrology isn't always replicable?

>

> Many scientists have a simple query against the astrologers – If

> astrology

> is a science then its principles must be replicable?

>

> In Science, a discovery is made a natural law if the same phenomenon is

> replicable given the same conditions. Let us understand this with a small

> example of rain. Rain cannot happen without clouds. This is the law but

> this

> kind of suggests that whenever clouds are present rain occurs. We all

> know

> this isn't true. The correct replicable law is that for rain to happen

> not

> only the clouds have to be present, but, they have to be so full of

> moisture

> that they cannot hold it any longer. This is replicable but not always.

> Anywhere in the tropical world the clouds cannot hold moisture then it

> rains. In the Tundra regions, however, this law does not hold true. There

> instead of rain the moisture might fall as snow. So the law of rain is

> changed again to hold true for some regions.

>

> In Astrology, many astrologers are presently engaged in showing

> replicable

> results to the world. They are doing commendable work but here we would

> like

> to give reasons why astrology and its laws are not always replicable.

>

> Astrology measures the energy at any given point of an event and then

> discusses the likely events that are possible in the future in the space

> time continuum consequent to this event. Each event itself is a cause to

> a

> variety of possibilities. It is, therefore, possible to predict the

> variety

> of possibilities but very difficult to predict the exact future event.

>

> The events that one faces in life are called destiny. With each event or

> situation, an individual has a choice:

>

>

> To react to the situation in many different ways.

>

> To accept the situation and be proactive.

>

> To accept the situation and do nothing.

>

> Upon the choice of the individual the possibilities of the future events

> hang. As individual choices can be many the likelihood of the event

> happening in the future changes. This change in probability is born out

> of a

> simple understanding of science of human nature.

>

> The more the humans are non-reactive to their destiny the harder it will

> be

> to determine the happenings likely to occur in their future. This may

> represent only 1% of the total humanity yet it cannot be treated as an

> exception.

>

> Astrology therefore is, for the very scientific reasons it upholds, not

> replicable, always.

>

> End of Article

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 22. It is said that stars affect us! It appears either these

>> astrologers have gone honkers themselves or they suppose that all

>> the world has really gone mad! Let us see how:

>> I am a tiny human being on this small planet called earth. The sun

>> is hundreds of thousands of times larger than the earth! And there

>> are other stars of our nakshatra/rashichakra that are supposed to

>> affect me individually as per the Dasha-Bhukti that is running in my

>> horoscope! However, this fantastic statement has no leg to stand

>> upon since the nearest star of that Rashichakra is Alpha Aquilae

>> which is known as Shravana in Sanskrit! And do you know its distance

>> from me? It is seventeen light years! And it is several times

>> larger than our sun! In other words, if that star wants to ?affect?

>> me individually, it will take it at least seventeen years to do so

>> even if that ?effect? travels at the speed of light! And by then,

>> my Rahu or Shani or whatever Dasha it may be must have been over!

>> Then how can such a star which is trillions of times larger than me

>> send its rays in a concentrated from just to haunt me at a

>> particular point of time! Can you imagine what type of laughing

>> stocks we are making of ourselves by believing in such hocus pocus!

>> Similarly, the next nearest star of our Rashichakra is Alpha Bootis

>> known as Swati in Sanskrit! It is away by 26 light years from me

>> and is again several times larger than our sun!!

>> It thus defies imagination as to how a scientist like Albert

>> Einstein could have made a statement like ?stars affect us?! I m

>> sure he could not have been cowed down by the special ?aura? or ?

>> halo? which these ?Jyotishis? are supposed to have since that is

>> only to befool simpletons like ignorant adivasis!

>> Secondly, by quoting Newton and Einstein, these ?Vedic Jyotishis?

>> are themselves proving that they have no common sense at all! If at

>> all these two scientists did claim to believe in astrology, they

>> would have believed in Western system since there was no ?Vedic

>> Jyotish? around those days! And these two systems are just

>> antitheses to one another ? they cannot be integrated at any point

>> of time since if my sayana moon is in Vrisha, my nirayana moon is in

>> Mesha and so on! Similarly, there are no Dasha bhuktis in the

>> Western system nor is there any Sade-Sati etc. Thus whatever

>> support they try to muster for their preposterous claims goes in

>> fact against the very grain of their own arguments!

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> If light from our Earth travels to another Nakshatra in 17 years and

> carries

> with it the information of the people here, and comes back from there

> back

> to Earth in 17 years. That means the past event of 34 years back affects

> us.

> This is wonderful. Can you list all the times, it can be an aid in our

> study? This can be a nice topic of research.

> (BHARAT end)

>

> 23. It is being said that quite a few Western ?Vamadevas? and

>> other ?Rishis? have started believing in ?Vedic Jyotish?. We

>> must not forget that Westerners like their Eastern counter-parts are

>> interested in earning a few bucks the quickest way! Just by reading

>> a few books by Dr. B. V. Raman or K. N. Rao etc. etc. and the much

>> touted ?Brihat Parashara Hora Shastram? they can declare themselves

>> as qualified ?Vedic astrologers? It is immaterial if they cannot

>> pronounce even the words of shantipath like ?poornam adah poornam

>> idam? properly or correctly, leave alone understanding their

>> meaning, but then we have become so blind because of greed and

>> avarice that we just let them masquerade as ?Vamadevas? and ?

>> Parasharas?. This can happen only with Hindu religion, which we are

>> supposed to defend! Why don?t these ?Vamadevas? proclaim themselves

>> to be re-incarnations of Jesus Christ or St. Paul or St. John and so

>> on! We have already a glut of so many incarnations like Radha

>> and Dattatreya and so on and so forth that we hardly need imported

>> Vamadevas! Thus instead of preserving our cultural integrity, we are

>> appreciating the efforts of ?Vedic Jyotishi East India Company? to

>> help us disintegrate our own culture by propagating some non-sense

>> called ?Vedic Jyotish? in overseas countries as well as in India.

>> I do not know how many times I will have to repeat it that

>> predictive gimmicks are against the letter as well as spirit of the

>> Vedas, Puranas, Itihasas and Smritis and therefore, have to be

>> shunned at the earliest! And naturally, these imported ?Vamadevas?

>> are just jugglers who have no other motives but to make fools of us

>> and make us deviate from our cultural heritage, pretending as if

>> they are propagating it!

>> 24.I have yet to receive any response to my challenge to all these

>> jyotishis to quote even a single reference from any of our shastras

>> which has advised us to marry only after matching horoscopes! Leave

>> alone shastras, they cannot quote anything even from their own ?

>> Jyotisha bibles?. What type of experts are these ?Vamadevas? and ?

>> Parasharas? and ?Varahamihiras? if they cannot vindicate their

>> statements/stands even by a single shastric text?

>> Do you need any other proofs to understand that you are really being

>> made a fool by these jyotishis?

>> The last nail in the coffin of astrological gimmicks is the chart

>> for the new lunar year! It has been proved by me already quoting

>> all the relevant Vedas and shastras that the current lunar New Year

>> started on February 28, 2006, with the topocentric New Moon for

>> Delhi at exactly 5hrs 0mts IST. But then all the vernacular papers,

>> apart from astrological magazines, are making predictions for the

>> new year on the basis of a lunar New Year supposed to start from

>> March 30, 2006, with the chart for New Moon being prepared for 15hrs

>> 45 mts. IST on March 29, 2006. In fact that is the time of

>> Geocentric New Moon for an imaginary ?centre of the earth? whereas

>> the actual time of topocentric New Moon for Delhi on that date is

>> 17hrs 26 mts. IST!

>> You can see it for yourself that not only is the very date of the

>> New Year chart for a wrong date ? March 29 instead of February 28,

>> but even the timing of erecting that chart is based on a geocentric

>> New Moon instead of the New Moon with parallax corrections for

>> Delhi, which is known as topocentric phenomenon!

>> But then, as usual, these jyotishis will claim to have made correct

>> predictions for our ?matribhoomi? i.e. Bharatavarsha since, even at

>> the cost of repeating a statement for the umpteenth time, these

>> Vedic jyotishis can make correct predictions only from fundamentally

>> incorrect data!

>> In view of the above discussion, it is clear that predictive

>> gimmicks have no basis either as per the shastras or modern

>> sciences. It is immaterial whether these predictive techniques are

>> of Indian system ? euphemistically known as ?Vedic Jyotisha? or

>> Western system. On the other hand, the so called Vedic Jyotisha has

>> made us celebrate all our festivals on wrong days and the earlier we

>> shun it the better so that we can start using a seasonal year for

>> deciding our fasts, fairs, festivals and muhurtas.

>> When are you going to do that?

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

(BHARAT start)

> I am so sorry, I replied to your entire email!

>

> Do not expect me to do again, especially with your attitude. Try not to

> reply back with some more nonsensical stuff. I just replied for the sake

> my

> fellow friends and Vedic Astrologers.

>

> If your purpose is only to correct the Ayanamsha or to erase it, please

> talk

> to the relevant people. You can take it up with the government of India

> or

> someone else. You are free not to be an astrologer and especially not a

> Vedic one. I shall call Astrology Vedic, much to your dislike perhaps.

>

> Thanks and Regards

> Bharat

>

>

With kind regards,

>> Avtar Krishen Kaul

>> PS. For complete details and a free program to calculate planetary

>> data from 10001 BC to 12030 AD, please log on to:

>> HinduCalendar

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

>>

>> --- End forwarded message ---

>>

>>

>>

 

__________

GET FREE 5GB ONLINE STORAGE - Safely store your documents, photos and music

online!

Visit http://www.inbox.com/storage to find out more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Prafulla ji,

Well said!

Love,

Sreenadh

 

, Prafulla Gang

<jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Kaul,

>

> Well - I am neither Sanskrit scholar nor a hisotrian. But how does

it matter - if for the sake of assumption that - Jyotish in not

originated from Vedas. Shri Bharat has explained it quite well on its

origin.

>

> Even if it is not originated from veda, and if it is working (just

like so many new technologies) well; We can still read / learn /

apply it for the benefit of human race and native. Yes - astrologers

in general, must spend energies in making best use of the technology

and knowledge base.

>

> Even if history confirms many of jyotish principle induction from

Greek astrology (or anywhere else) - owning it to our culture is not

the crisis issue. The key is to make sure that - it works on

consistent basis, in the limited life span of an astrologer.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

> http://www.prafulla.net

>

> Reason makes mistakes, Conscience never does

> ************************************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

WAVES-Vedic , subash razdan <subashrazdan

wrote:

 

Dear Subash,

 

Here are my comments about the article presented below......

 

While attending the annual conference of the Academy of

International Business in China in June, I had a fabulous two week

trip to Beijing and Shanghai with a group of ten faculty members from

Bentley. The trip gave us an opportunity to see the Great Wall of

China, about 80 miles north of Beijing. I want to tell you the

thought that came to my mind as I was standing on the wall after

climbing the uneven stairs for almost an hour. At the end of the 5th

century AD, the Huns from Central Asia tried to attack China but the

Chinese army defeated them decisively at this 3,000 mile long wall

with fortifications at strategic places. Unfortunately, the Huns

turned westwards after their defeat in China and changed the course

of history by destroying two great empires of the ancient times. One

branch of the Huns ravaged Europe and destroyed the Roman Empire and

another branch turned towards India at the time when the Gupta Empire

was at its zenith. From their bases at Bamian

and Balkh, one of the Hun commanders, Toramana, defeated the Gupta

army and occupied Kashmir, Punjab, and Malwa, and his son,

Mihiragula, extended the Hun conquest to Gujarat. North India, as a

Hindu empire, never recovered from this disaster and the ground was

prepared for the Moslem conquest of India.

 

In the declining stages of the Gupta Empire, India was infested

with Ponga pundits, fortune tellers and astrologers of all kinds, and

the bewildering superstitions of the Purans had supplanted the

sublime wisdom of the Vedas.

 

Perhaps this is the ultimate truth of history: empires rise and

fall on the undulating waves of time, but the Chinese empire did a

better job of protecting itself by relying on its own efforts by

building the wall rather than waiting for some preternatural

interposition at the last moment, as you often see in Bollywood

movies.

 

After seeing Beijing and Shanghai I am convinced that the Chinese

are now building their infrastructure with the same enthusiasm that

they showed in building the Great Wall thousands of years ago.

 

I fully agree with the broad analysis of your friend Mr. Kaul. We

can disagree on some small facts here and there but I am deeply

impressed by the power of his arguments and the facts he has given

from our scriptures to support them. I have myself found no

astrological forecasts in the Rigveda, which I have been studying for

more than 15 years now. I will give you an example of what I have

found in the Rigveda about stars and galaxies. One of the greatest

rishis of the Vedas, Devaraata, looks at the stars and with the

childlike curiosity of ?Twinkle, twinkle little star?? he says to

himself, ?All these constellations shining so high in the sky show up

at night but I wonder where they go at daytime. The laws of Varuna,

the sacred spirit that controls the movement of stars, are so

inviolable that the moon comes at night and shines for us.? Of

course, Devaraata is composing the noble thought in Sanskrit with the

perfect measure and cadence of words of the ?trishtubh?

meter:

 

?amii ya rixaa nihitaasa uchchaa naktaM dadRishre kuhachiddiveyuH

adabdhaani varuNasya vRtaani vichaakashachchandramaa naktameti? [1,

24, 10]

 

I was looking at the stars one night from my backyard while reciting

this mantra and as the intensity of the thought increased in my mind,

I had an authentic mystical experience. Suddenly I felt that my

physical body had disappeared and I was floating freely among the

stars and constellations as pure thought submerged in the spiritual

rays pouring through the transparent darkness of night. The sense of

delight was overwhelming and the entire experience was awe inspiring

but, unfortunately, it did not last for more than a second. When I

woke up from my trance, I realized that it was nothing more than my

silly imagination. But what a beautiful imagination it was! I would

like to repeat the experience every time I look at the firmament at

night. This to me is the Vedic experience, not what the fortune

tellers can tell me about my future. I am convinced, just like Mr.

Kaul, that unless we go back to the bedrock principles of the Vedas

and devote our energies to the

understanding of the fundamental forces that create, preserve, and

destroy the universe, nations, cultures and individuals, we are in

grave danger of becoming slaves again. One of the greatest strengths

of our culture has been that we have preserved our soul intact

through all the vicissitudes of history but, I am afraid, we are now

losing it gradually and willingly because we do not have the learned

sages of the Vedas to inspire us.

 

Warm regards to you.

 

Satya Prakash

 

Satya Prakash Saraswat, Ph.D.

Professor of Information and Process Management

Bentley College

175 Forest Street

Waltham, MA 02452

USA

USA

Phone: 781-891-3104

Fax: 781-891-2949

 

 

 

 

 

 

" Vedic Astrology " - the greatest fraud on the Vedas!

Submitted by jyotirved on Sat, 2006-04-22 12:54. -->Submitted by

jyotirved on Sat, 2006-04-22 12:54.

Dear Biradari Members,

Namaskar Mahara!!

Kashmiri Pandits are as addicted to Patri Melapak (Tekini milnavuni)

as anybody else! Besides, there is hardly anyone, even if he does

not know ABC of jyotish, who does not want to know as to when

his " badsharwar " (sade–sati) will start or end etc. etc. I have gone

through all those pangs myself and made a thorough study of all the

astrological works besides a lot of astronomical books! I even

studied Western system of astrology and had become a " famous "

astrologer, though my predictions were as correct as anybody else's

i.e. hardly 50%. However, this is a secret that no other " jyotishi "

shares with anybody -- that his/her predictions are hardly more

correct than fifty per cent, whatever logic or Ayanamsha he may use!

When I analyzed the reasons for such a dismal rate of

success/failure, the conclusions were startling! And I am keeping

those very conclusions before you!

I have been asked very often whether I would prefer Western system of

predictions to the Indian system or vice-versa!

To arrive at any conclusions about such a discussion, we have to bear

the following facts in our minds:

1. Whether Indian or Western, no system of predictions has any

sanction either from the Vedas or even Puranas least of all our

dharmashastras etc.

2. All our shastras admonish us from consulting " nakshatra jeevis "

so much so that the Manusmriti calls these nakshatrajeevis as

outcastes and not fit to sit in any sabha of learned people.

3. The Manusmriti advises that " The king must keep a watch on his

kingdom like a heron and act with prowess like a lion " --- nowhere

has he advised to consult some soothsayer before undertaking any

activity!

4. All the Ramayanas, whether Valmiki or Adhyatma or

Ramacharitamanasa etc. etc. say that before deciding about the

coronation of Bhagwan Rama, Dashratha wanted his guru Vasishtha to

find some suitable muhurtas for that function. It was on the advice

of Bhagwan Vasishtha that Dasharatha decided to anoint the Yuvraja

the very next day, as it was " Tishya " then. It is clear that either

Vasishtha Muni did not know as to what was going to happen to

Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as crown-prince or he kept quiet

deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine

dispensation!

Obviously, being the son of Brahmaji and being a highly exalted yogi

as well as jnyani, Vasishtha-muni could peep into past as well as

future. It means that even if some exalted souls can foresee as to

what is going to happen, they do not reveal our " bhavishya " before

hand, unlike the breed of astrologers of today, who masquerade

as " Paasharas " and " Vamadevas " to tell us even our past and future

janmas just by glancing at our birth-charts, even if those charts are

fundamentally incorrect.

5. Almost all the jyotishis suggest one or the other remedial measure

to their clients, and mostly these are in the form of various gems.

What is surprising is that we have become so dimwitted that we forget

our entire itihasa of our past!

(i) Why was Dasharatha not suggested some " ruby "

or " coral " to ward off the evil Dasha that was going to kill him when

Rama would leave for the forests?

Because our Rishis were not greedy to have claimed to cheat death by

just making him buy some gems!

(ii) Bhagwan Krishna was born in a prison --- I wonder why He

could not use some " sapphire " to take birth in a palace!

(iii)Vasudeva and Devaki---the parents of Bhagwan Krishna--- were in

chains when He was born! It is said that Lord Krishna was a complete –

16 kala sampoorna --- divine incarnation of Vishnu and was thus

really Omnipotent, Omnipresent and Omniscient! He could loosen the

chains of His mother as well as father while taking birth in a

prison! He could make all the guards of Kansa's prison fall asleep

while being taken out of prison by Vasudeva! He demonstrated His

Omnipotence by making Yamuna recede while Vasudeva was carrying Him

to Gokul from Mathura! He guided Vasudeva on his way back from Gokul

to Mathura in a dark night full of torrential rains and storms! The

guards remained asleep till Vasudeva entered the prison after

bringing Yogamaya from Mathura with him! It all shows that Krishna

was really Omnipotent!

But then the moment Vasudeva was back in prison, his fetters were

again gridlocked automatically! Same was the case with Devaki! Both

Devaki and Vasudeva remained in fetters till Kansa was killed by

Krishna!

What does it demonstrate? Just the fact that if the Omniscient,

Omnipresent and Omnipotent Krishna could not ameliorate the miseries

of His own father or mother before the appointed time, how can a ruby

or a sapphire---or some Mangala or Shani yagya--- remove all our

miseries or give us a Union Minister's seat!

Obviously, we are being taken for a ride by such Jyotishis!

Then not in the distant past, Smti Indira Gandhi would run after

astrologers for knowing her future. She had a rare and original

ekamukhi rudraksha, which only either the Maharaja of Nepal had or

she was wearing! It is said that some top-notch jyotishis had

suggested that rudraksha to her! Ironically, both the King of Nepal

as well Mrs. Indira Gandhi were assassinated " by the people "

they " had trusted " ekamukhi rudraksha not withstanding!

What does it prove? That we should not be hoodwinked by soothsayers!

Then again a well known Tantrik of yore---highly respected by the

then PM--- is out on bail, not by dint of his " Tantra-Kriya " but

because of some legal loopholes in FERA!

Dhirendra Brahmachari, another high profile " Tantrik " , met with an

accident in the plane he was flying himself! If he could not see his

own death looming large how could he forewarn others!

6. The Gita is said to be the gist of all our shastras. When Arjuna

expressed his doubt about whether Pandavas would win or lose the

battle, Bhagwan Krishna neither asked him to consult some soothsayer

nor did He tell him to wear some ruby! On the other hand, He just

advised him to fight and either get killed on the battlefield and go

to heavens or win the battle to be the ruler of the entire earth!

What does that prove? Obviously, it warns us against relying on any

soothsayers, especially if they call themselves " Vedic Jyotishis "

since they are taking us for a ride literally.

7. Yes, Bhagwan Ram did worship Shiva at the time of going to war at

Rameshwaram but that was not to please Mangal or Shani, but to show

respect to the divine trinity -- Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh---in this

case Vishnu worshipping Shiva!

Similarly, at the time of the Mahabharata war Arjuna was asked to

worship Maha-Shakti but not to please Rahu or Ketu but to gain

strength from his own ATMA-Shakti, in the form of Divine Shakti!

The Gita is very clear " ye yatha mam prapadyante tanstathaiva

bajameaham " --- " I will

`worship' you in whatever way you worship Me " .

8. There is no mention of any Rishi like Vasishtha or Garga or

Brighu ever having written any works of predictive astrology in

any of the Puranas. The Vishnu Purana by Parasharis is full of

astronomical references ---and that also sayana i.e. the seasonal

year when Mesha sankranti is another name of Spring Equinox and so

on, but we do not find any mention of any Brihat Parasharis Hora

Shastra there! Obviously, it is the worst concoction that can ever

be had, and that is why it is the bible of " Vedic astrologers "

9. In India, we have started going downhill ever since our rulers

started runningafter Jyotishis. In ancient days, during the time of

Mahabharata, it was a dharma yudha that we had to fight against our

own Duryodhanas but ever since the advent of astrology before the

invasion of Alexander the Great, and with him the " Yavana Jatakam " of

Sphujidwaja and the Surya Sidhanta of Maya the Yavana (mlechha!), we

had to fight outsiders! The more the outsiders invaded us the more

our rulers started consulting soothsayers whom they called

Rajyajyotishis! (In those days jyotishis did not dare to call

themselves Vedic Jyotishis since the general public was not then that

illiterate about the Vedic principles as they are thee days, thanks

to Vedic Jyotishis!)

10. These monarchs wanted to know if at all their horoscopes

indicated whether they would win or lose and for winning the

battles, instead of making military preparations they just started

wearing rubies and diamonds to ward off evil spirits!

11. The maximum credit for creating such a fear of omens and ghosts

and ghouls and storms and even clouds goes to Varahamihira! It

appears he later reincarnated as N. C. Lahiri since both of them had

their own axes to grind -- the former wanted to make his

Brihatsamhita/Brihat Jatakam and Panchasidhantika world famous and

the latter wanted to sell the maximum copies of his Bangla Vishudha

Sidhanta Panjika and " Lahiri's Indian Ephemeris " " . Before venturing

into the battlefield, these monarchs would ask their soothsayer to

prepare " narpati jaya charya " and consult Brihat Samhita etc. to see

whether the " ketuchara " was favorable at that time or not! No wonder

with such a preliminary and hopeless knowledge of astronomical facts,

we were being pushed back into dark ages by these jyotishis!

12. Our historical records are witness to the fact that we were

vanquished in every battle whether it was with Alexander the

Great or Chengiz Khan or Muhamud of Gazni or Nadir Shah or the

Moguls or finally the East India Company, thanks to the dependence

of our monarchs on soothsayers (Rajajyotishis, huh!) instead of the

principles of war strategy and statecraft as adumbrated by Chanakya,

who chided the kings for consulting soothsayers!

12. The fate of BJP has not been any better than that of our earlier

monarchs by depending more on their " Vedic Jyotishis " who were

responsible for getting " Vedic Jyotisha (sic!) " prescribed in Indian

Universities! It is that very move that boomeranged on the party and

even the " Minister of astrology " did not even win his own

parliamentary seat, let alone being the Union Minister again, lest

these " Vedic jyotishis " continued to perpetuate Adharma in the guise

of " Vedic Jyotisha " ! Do you need any other proofs of the fact that

these " Vedic Jyotishis " are really a scourge who will make you lose

your seat of power just by making you advance your elections?

13. If we continue to follow the trend of our " monarchs " of having

blind faith in our soothsayers, there is no doubt that sooner than

later we will become yesteryears' Babylon, which is known as Iraq

these days!

14. It was priest class i.e. Brahmins the most respected community

with whom the secrets of predictive gimmicks were supposed to

rest! Just see the plight of the Brahmin community these days! They

age treated worse than any OBC in case of government jobs and other

quotas! Why so? Simply because they lost their dharma by being

nakshatra jeevis, caring two hoots for the admonishments of the

Manu! No wonder they – the Brahmins are not fit for being consulted

in any sabha of scholars!

15. I must put on record that as a Kashmiri Pandit, I have more to

blame predictive gimmicks and soothsayers, including the panchanga

makers, than anything or anybody else since they never " forearmed "

(their pet dialogue is `forewarned is forearmed!)us about any

calamities that were going to befall us! On the other hand, just to

prove their astrological gimmicks, they just made ---and are still

making --- us celebrate all our festivals, including Mahashivaratri

on wrong days. It is these very jyotishis, whom we had treated as our

friends, philosophers and guides, who are responsible for our

downfall as Kahsmiri Pandits, since they proved neither our friends,

nor philosophers least of all our guides! These Panchanga

makers/jyotishis were the first to flee from Kashmir --- like the

king Hari Sigh at the time of Pakistani raid in 1948 (hope he had

consulted his " rajajyotishi " to decide the muhurtas for taking the

last flight to Jammu/Mumbai)----since they had already

made their alternate homes in safer places like Jammu and Delhi

They just proved to be Shylocks, who were only interested in their

Pound of flesh by way of Dakshinas for janmapatris and panchangas and

matching of horoscopes -- all cheating and nothing else!

16. These soothsayers have such a hypnotic grip on us that

initially even I was brain washed to believe that the Vedas had

nothing else to tell us excepting teaching us predictive astrology!

I was also so convinced that it appeared that even the principle of

Secondary Progressions must have been exported from India to Western

countries since the principle of " A day equals a year " was mentioned

in our Vedas!

17. However, there are neither rashis like Mesha etc. nor planets

like Mangal, Shani etc.

in the Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmanas etc. etc. Similarly, Vedanga

Jyotisha, as has been made clear several times already, is an

astronomical work of 14th century BCE and tells us as to how to

calculate mean tithi, nakshatra and Uttarayana-cum-Tapah-cum Magha

etc. months. It does not list any rashis nor any planets like

Mangal, Budha etc. Same is the case with Yajur Jyotisha of about

11th century BCE and later Atharva Jyotisha of about 5th century

BCE. As such, it is really a fraud on the Vedas being played by

some charlatans to call any predictive gimmicks as Vedic astrology

and hail themselves " Vedic Jyotishis " . It is equally a crime under

Consumer Protection Act since it is a misrepresentation of facts to a

client and is thus a deficiency in service.

18.It is being said that Sir Isaac Newton believed in astrology!

That just is not possible! The astronomical ephemeredes, from which

horoscopes are made, were so incorrect that " Horary Astrology " by a

world famous Western astrologer, William Lilly, of 17th century,

published by American Federation of Astrologers, has the planetary

positions of all the charts incorrect! He was a contemporary of Sir

Isaac Newton, and thus even if Newton had wanted to believe in

predictive astrology, he could never have done so since the

astronomical works of that period were fundamentally incorrect as

they were mostly based on Ptolemy's Almagest!

In other words, the astronomical works of the West were hardly

better than the Surya Sidhanta or Aryabhati of India!

19.Similarly, Albert Einstein is supposed to have believed in

astrology! Dr. B. V. Raman has not said so anywhere in his " world

famous " book " Notable Horoscopes " while discussing the horoscope of

Einstein! Similarly, there has been no such indication in any of the

astrological magazines which normally jump on such hearsays to encash

them! It maybe mentioned here that even in the " Notable Horoscopes "

hardly any chart even of the 20th century is correct, leave alone the

charts of Bhagwan Krishna or Gautama the Budha or Shankaracharya!

There is also a difference of heaven and earth in the planetary

longitudes of the same work in a consolidated form given at pages 426

to 431 and the main charts given in the chart form! Even the chart

of the erstwhile editor of the Astrological Magazine viz. Dr. B. V.

Raman himself given at page No. 401 is incorrect! And he was supposed

to be the " greatest Vedic astrologer " of the twentieth century but

surprisingly, could not calculate

even his own horoscope properly!

Same is the case with the chart No. 74, which is actually the

chart of the spouse of Dr. B. V. Raman! The planetary longitudes on

that page do not at all tally with the ones given at page 470 in the

same book!

And the delineations of all such charts are correct! In other

words, " Vedic astrology " can make correct predictions only from

incorrect data!

20. We have demonstrated it practically through " Mahesh " that it is

impossible for any astrological predictions to have been correct in

the past either based as they were on the data from the Surya

Sidhanta or Aryabhati or Brahma Sphuta Sidhanta or Sidhanta

Shiromani ----whether they were supposed to be so called nirayana or

so called sayana! But then may be that is the beauty of predictive

astrology -- whether " Vedic " or " not-so-Vedic " --- to make correct

predictions from incorrect data!

21. Predictive astrology is supposed to be a " science " ! What a

preposterous statement! When the data on which predictions were based

or are based these days are not correct, how can the results be

correct and how can we draw correct inferences when we have not made

correct observations at all!

22. It is said that stars affect us! It appears either these

astrologers have gone honkers themselves or they suppose that all the

world has really gone mad! Let us see how:

I am a tiny human being on this small planet called earth. The sun

is hundreds of thousands of times larger than the earth! And there

are other stars of our nakshatra/rashichakra that are supposed to

affect me individually as per the Dasha-Bhukti that is running in my

horoscope! However, this fantastic statement has no leg to stand upon

since the nearest star of that Rashichakra is Alpha Aquilae which is

known as Shravana in Sanskrit! And do you know its distance from me?

It is seventeen light years! And it is several times larger than our

sun! In other words, if that star wants to " affect " me individually,

it will take it at least seventeen years to do so even if

that " effect " travels at the speed of light! And by then, my Rahu or

Shani or whatever Dasha it may be must have been over!

Then how can such a star which is trillions of times larger than me

send its rays in a concentrated from just to haunt me at a particular

point of time! Can you imagine what type of laughing stocks we are

making of ourselves by believing in such hocus pocus!

Similarly, the next nearest star of our Rashichakra is Alpha Bootis

known as Swati in Sanskrit! It is away by 26 light years from me and

is again several times larger than our sun!!

It thus defies imagination as to how a scientist like Albert Einstein

could have made a statement like " stars affect us " ! I m sure he

could not have been cowed down by the special " aura " or " halo " which

these " Jyotishis " are supposed to have since that is only to befool

simpletons like ignorant adivasis!

Secondly, by quoting Newton and Einstein, these " Vedic Jyotishis " are

themselves proving that they have no common sense at all! If at all

these two scientists did claim to believe in astrology, they would

have believed in Western system since there was no " Vedic Jyotish "

around those days! And these two systems are just antitheses to one

another – they cannot be integrated at any point of time since if my

sayana moon is in Vrisha, my nirayana moon is in Mesha and so on!

Similarly, there are no Dasha bhuktis in the Western system nor is

there any Sade-Sati etc. Thus whatever support they try to muster

for their preposterous claims goes in fact against the very grain of

their own arguments!

23. It is being said that quite a few Western " Vamadevas " and

other " Rishis " have started believing in " Vedic Jyotish " . We

must not forget that Westerners like their Eastern counter-parts are

interested in earning a few bucks the quickest way! Just by reading

a few books by Dr. B. V. Raman or K. N. Rao etc. etc. and the much

touted " Brihat Parashara Hora Shastram " they can declare themselves

as qualified " Vedic astrologers " It is immaterial if they cannot

pronounce even the words of shantipath like " poornam adah poornam

idam " properly or correctly, leave alone understanding their meaning,

but then we have become so blind because of greed and avarice that we

just let them masquerade as " Vamadevas " and " Parasharas " . This can

happen only with Hindu religion, which we are supposed to defend! Why

don't these " Vamadevas " proclaim themselves to be re-incarnations of

Jesus Christ or St. Paul or St. John and so on! We have already a

glut of so many incarnations like Radha

and Dattatreya and so on and so forth that we hardly need imported

Vamadevas! Thus instead of preserving our cultural integrity, we are

appreciating the efforts of " Vedic Jyotishi East India Company " to

help us disintegrate our own culture by propagating some non-sense

called " Vedic Jyotish " in overseas countries as well as in India.

I do not know how many times I will have to repeat it that predictive

gimmicks are against the letter as well as spirit of the Vedas,

Puranas, Itihasas and Smritis and therefore, have to be shunned at

the earliest! And naturally, these imported " Vamadevas " are just

jugglers who have no other motives but to make fools of us and make

us deviate from our cultural heritage, pretending as if they are

propagating it!

24.I have yet to receive any response to my challenge to all these

jyotishis to quote even a single reference from any of our shastras

which has advised us to marry only after matching horoscopes! Leave

alone shastras, they cannot quote anything even from their

own " Jyotisha bibles " . What type of experts are these " Vamadevas "

and " Parasharas " and " Varahamihiras " if they cannot vindicate their

statements/stands even by a single shastric text?

Do you need any other proofs to understand that you are really being

made a fool by these jyotishis?

The last nail in the coffin of astrological gimmicks is the chart for

the new lunar year! It has been proved by me already quoting all the

relevant Vedas and shastras that the current lunar New Year started

on February 28, 2006, with the topocentric New Moon for Delhi at

exactly 5hrs 0mts IST. But then all the vernacular papers, apart

from astrological magazines, are making predictions for the new year

on the basis of a lunar New Year supposed to start from March 30,

2006, with the chart for New Moon being prepared for 15hrs 45 mts.

IST on March 29, 2006. In fact that is the time of Geocentric New

Moon for an imaginary " centre of the earth " whereas the actual time

of topocentric New Moon for Delhi on that date is 17hrs 26 mts. IST!

You can see it for yourself that not only is the very date of the New

Year chart for a wrong date – March 29 instead of February 28, but

even the timing of erecting that chart is based on a geocentric New

Moon instead of the New Moon with parallax corrections for Delhi,

which is known as topocentric phenomenon!

But then, as usual, these jyotishis will claim to have made correct

predictions for our " matribhoomi " i.e. Bharatavarsha since, even at

the cost of repeating a statement for the umpteenth time, these Vedic

jyotishis can make correct predictions only from fundamentally

incorrect data!

In view of the above discussion, it is clear that predictive gimmicks

have no basis either as per the shastras or modern sciences. It is

immaterial whether these predictive techniques are of Indian system –

euphemistically known as " Vedic Jyotisha " or Western system. On the

other hand, the so called Vedic Jyotisha has made us celebrate all

our festivals on wrong days and the earlier we shun it the better so

that we can start using a seasonal year for deciding our fasts,

fairs, festivals and muhurtas.

When are you going to do that?

With kind regards,

Avtar Krishen Kaul

PS. For complete details and a free program to calculate planetary

data from 10001 BC to 12030 AD, please log on to:

HinduCalendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out.

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...