Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Nondual literature and art, poetry

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Sometimes i'm asked if i don't to nondual model of reality why bother

with this list. Nonduality used to be a psychobabble gibberish to me till i read

Ramana. In Cambridge, Mass I think i understood what these strange group of

people were talking about at satsangs in front of a western style guru. Although

i was intrigued with sufi poetry before, i realized that until i read Ramana i

didn't really understand why a famous sufi had said, " I am the Truth. " By the

way i was never into the sufi or darwish path. Then i came across a bunch of

more Advaita gurus and it sounded all very " new age " to me. When i finally read

Maharaj i started to appreciate nonduality for its poetic madness. Now this was

something i could appreciate because it was art, expressing oneself in a way

that borders insanity. I remember reading on the net this line from Maharaj,

" Myself

and everybody else appear and disappear in your world. We are all at

your mercy. " It would repeat itself the way someone repeats lines from Hamlet of

Homer. This was not just an esoteric mystical school anymore but it was a

serious literature, a form of art that changes one's emotions.

 

The following is an example:

 

Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

 

 

Questioner: My own feeling is that my spiritual development is not

in my hands. Making one's own plans and carrying them out leads

nowhere. I just run in circles round myself. When God considers the

fruit to be ripe, He will pluck it and eat it. Whichever fruit seems

green to Him will remain on the world's tree for another day.

 

Maharaj: You think God knows you? Even the world He does not know.

 

Q: Yours is a different God. Mine is different. Mine is merciful. He

suffers along with us.

 

M: You pray to save one, while thousands die. And if all stop dying,

there will be no space on earth.

 

Q: I am not afraid of death. My concern is with sorrow and suffering.

My God is a simple God and rather helpless. He has no power to compel

us to be wise. He can only stand and wait.

 

M: If you and your God are both helpless, does it not imply that the

world is accidental? And if it is, the only thing you can do is to go

beyond it.

 

Questioner: Without God's power nothing can be done. Even you would

not be sitting here and talking to us without Him.

 

Maharaj: All is His doing, no doubt. What is it to me, since I want

nothing? What can God give me, or take away from me?

What is mine is mine and was mine even when God was not. Of course,

it is avery tiny little thing, a speck the sense 'I am',

the fact of being. This is my own place, nobody gave it to me. The

earth is mine: what grows on it is God's.

 

Q: Did God take the earth on rent from you?

 

M: God is my devotee and did all this for me.

 

Q: Is there no God apart from you?

 

M: How can there be? 'I am' is the root, God is the tree. Whom am I

to worship, and what for?

 

Q: Are you the devotee or the object of devotion?

 

M: Am neither, I am devotion itself.

 

Q: There is not enough devotion in the world.

 

M: You are always after the improvement of the world. Do you really

believe that the world is waiting for you to be saved?

 

Q: I just do not know how much I can do for the world. All I can do,

is to try. Is there anything else you would like me to do?

 

M: Without you is there a world? You know all about the world, but

about yourself you know nothing. You yourself are the tools of your

work, you have no other tools. Why don't you take care of the tools

before you think of the work?

 

Q: I can wait, while the world cannot.

 

M: By not enquiring you keep the world waiting.

 

Q: Waiting for what?

 

M: For somebody who can save it.

 

Q: God runs the world, God will save it.

 

M: That's what you say! Did God come and tell you that the world is

His creation and concern and not yours?

 

Q: Why should it be my sole concern?

 

M: Consider. The world in which you live, who else knows about it?

 

Q: You know. Everybody knows.

 

M: Did anybody come from outside of your world to tell you? Myself

and everybody else appear and disappear in your world. We are all at

your mercy.

 

Q: It cannot be so bad! I exist in your world as you exist in mine.

 

M: You have no evidence of my world. You are completely wrapped up in

the world of your own making.

 

Q: I see. Completely, but hopelessly?

 

M: Within the prison of your world appears a man who tells you that

the world of painful contradictions, which you have created, is

neither continuous nor permanent and is based on a misapprehension.

He pleads with you to get out of it, by the same way by which you got

into it. You got into it by forgetting what you are and you will get

out of it by knowing yourself as you are.

 

Q: In what way does it affect the world?

 

M: When you are free of the world, you can do something about it. As

long as you are a prisoner of it, you are helpless to change it. On

the contrary, whatever you do will aggravate the situation.

 

Q: Righteousness will set me free.

 

M: Righteousness will undoubtedly make you and your world a

comfortable, even happy place. But what is the use? There is no

reality in it. It cannot last.

 

Q: God will help.

 

M: To help you God must know your existence. But you and your world

are dream states. In dream you may suffer agonies. None knows them,

and none can help you.

 

Q: So all my questions, my search and study are of no use?

 

M: These are but the stirrings of a man who is tired of sleeping.

They are not the causes of awakening, but it's early signs. But, you

must not ask idle questions, to which you already know the answers.

 

I AM THAT,

Talks with

Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

Published by Acorn Press

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote:

>

> Sometimes i'm asked if i don't to nondual model of reality why

bother with this list. Nonduality used to be a psychobabble gibberish to me till

i read Ramana. In Cambridge, Mass I think i understood what these strange group

of people were talking about at satsangs in front of a western style guru.

Although i was intrigued with sufi poetry before, i realized that until i read

Ramana i didn't really understand why a famous sufi had said, " I am the Truth. "

By the way i was never into the sufi or darwish path. Then i came across a bunch

of more Advaita gurus and it sounded all very " new age " to me. When i finally

read Maharaj i started to appreciate nonduality for its poetic madness. Now this

was something i could appreciate because it was art, expressing oneself in a way

that borders insanity. I remember reading on the net this line from Maharaj,

" Myself

> and everybody else appear and disappear in your world. We are all at

> your mercy. " It would repeat itself the way someone repeats lines from Hamlet

of Homer. This was not just an esoteric mystical school anymore but it was a

serious literature, a form of art that changes one's emotions.

>

 

obviously i meant shakespeare's hamlet or homer's odyssey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...