Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Buddha on PBS Tonight

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , "geo" <inandor wrote:

> geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point.

 

*_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend

into oblivion, it is true.

 

Pete said:> "If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and> dangerous serial killer of personas and "I's".> Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it> and get done with the "I" and "persona". :>)

*_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of

my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless

smoky haze.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

>

>

> > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point.

>

>

>

> *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend

>

> into oblivion, it is true.

>

>

>

> Pete said:

> > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and

> > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " .

> > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it

> > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>)

>

>

> *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of

>

> my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless

>

> smoky haze.

>

>

> [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears]

 

 

 

 

with the Annihilation of " me " ..

 

who's anything meaningless or meaningful to?

 

wherefore a smoky haze?

 

neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other.

 

it's a real mutha.

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point.

> >

> >

> >

> > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend

> >

> > into oblivion, it is true.

> >

> >

> >

> > Pete said:

> > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and

> > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " .

> > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it

> > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>)

> >

> >

> > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of

> >

> > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless

> >

> > smoky haze.

> >

> >

> > [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears]

>

>

>

>

> with the Annihilation of " me " ..

>

> who's anything meaningless or meaningful to?

>

> wherefore a smoky haze?

>

> neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other.

>

> it's a real mutha.

>

> .b b.b.

 

 

who just asked that?

 

who is wondering?

 

what does " who " mean?

 

why i think i could have a V8.

 

and if i don't have a V8..

 

i would then have to say i could've had a V8..

 

but didn't.

 

this stuff is right up there with the Marchings of the Caesers.

 

it really is.

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point.

> >

> >

> >

> > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend

> >

> > into oblivion, it is true.

> >

> >

> >

> > Pete said:

> > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and

> > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " .

> > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it

> > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>)

> >

> >

> > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of

> >

> > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless

> >

> > smoky haze.

> >

> >

> > [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears]

>

>

>

>

> with the Annihilation of " me " ..

>

> who's anything meaningless or meaningful to?

>

> wherefore a smoky haze?

>

> neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other.

>

> it's a real mutha.

>

> .b b.b.

 

P: You, evil one, it's a real mukta. LOL

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

>

>

> > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point.

>

>

>

> *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend

>

> into oblivion, it is true.

>

>

>

> Pete said:

> > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and

> > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " .

> > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it

> > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>)

>

>

> *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of

>

> my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless

>

> smoky haze.

 

P: Lord! You are the best! Can I kiss your feet? I can't

go to Florida, but could you send at least one foot by

UPS?

 

" Can you spare a foot, sister? " This

strange request, a feet fetish vagrant,

directed to a young woman walking by

in sandals so reveling that they were

like feet tongs.

 

Wow! I thought, here is another desperate

seeker in search of a guru's foot to kiss. ;))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

>

 

>

> Wow! I thought, here is another desperate

> seeker in search of a guru's foot to kiss. ;))

>

 

that's why humans can't always fool me. ramana would tell them for the millionth

time that " you are the self, " and as soon as he'd turn around there would be a

group of them on their knees worshipping him.

 

it's not discussed much in the neo-advaita circles but according to a historical

theory, advaita was hindus response (especially the champion shankara) to the

clever arguments of buddhists in order to stop the buddhist expansion in the

indian sub continent. regardless of what impersonal theist arguments buddha or

shankara or ramana would talk about, the devotional followers want to

worship...it's part of the human nature for some.

 

personally speaking i can't worship a personal god anymore since that belief

left me. nowadays the only thing i worship is beauty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...