Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the senses. The reality is based on sensing, and being. It's absolutely direct. There's no attempt to create/maintain a verbal reality that can be shared between two. No attempt to hold a 'self-image' based on 'what I think you think of me'. This is happiness. There is a sense of promise, of infinite potentiality, despite the fact that there is no future for this. One simply does not attempt to create a false 'reality', based on what can never be real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > senses. > > The reality is based on sensing, and being. > > It's absolutely direct. > > There's no attempt to create/maintain a verbal reality that can be shared > between two. > > No attempt to hold a 'self-image' based on 'what I think you think of me'. > > This is happiness. > > There is a sense of promise, of infinite potentiality, despite the fact that > there is no future for this. > > One simply does not attempt to create a false 'reality', based on what can never > be real. really? you seem to be attempting to say something. it's bullshit though. you must not be too happy timmy. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > > senses. > > > > The reality is based on sensing, and being. > > > > It's absolutely direct. > > > > There's no attempt to create/maintain a verbal reality that can be shared > > between two. > > > > No attempt to hold a 'self-image' based on 'what I think you think of me'. > > > > This is happiness. > > > > There is a sense of promise, of infinite potentiality, despite the fact that > > there is no future for this. > > > > One simply does not attempt to create a false 'reality', based on what can never > > be real. > > > really? > > you seem to be attempting to say something. > > it's bullshit though. > > you must not be too happy timmy. > > .b b.b. > You, you, you, you, you. Eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > senses. Nonsense, Tim, Awarenes is not a field, it is a flow, flux. > > The reality is based on sensing, and being. Forget reality. There are as many realities as there are human beings. > > It's absolutely direct. Crap. > > There's no attempt to create/maintain a verbal reality that can be shared > between two. Ok, 'tomorrow will be tomorrow'. That is a verbal reality two human beings are sharing now. > > No attempt to hold a 'self-image' based on 'what I think you think of me'. Ok, lets take that, yawn ... > > This is happiness. Hahaha, Tim ... you are really crazy. Werner ..... snip .... > > There is a sense of promise, of infinite potentiality, despite the fact that > there is no future for this. > > One simply does not attempt to create a false 'reality', based on what can never > be real. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > > senses. > > > Nonsense, Tim, > > Awarenes is not a field, it is a flow, flux. Nonetheless, this is happiness, freedom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > > > senses. > > > > > > The reality is based on sensing, and being. > > > > > > It's absolutely direct. > > > > > > There's no attempt to create/maintain a verbal reality that can be shared > > > between two. > > > > > > No attempt to hold a 'self-image' based on 'what I think you think of me'. > > > > > > This is happiness. > > > > > > There is a sense of promise, of infinite potentiality, despite the fact that > > > there is no future for this. > > > > > > One simply does not attempt to create a false 'reality', based on what can never > > > be real. > > > > > > really? > > > > you seem to be attempting to say something. > > > > it's bullshit though. > > > > you must not be too happy timmy. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > You, you, you, you, you. > > Eh? yep. you think your not a you timmytot? LOL! ..b b.b. p.s. your non-dual knickers are in a twist twirly timmy. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > The reality here is that of an 'awareness-field', extending to the limit of the > > > senses. > > > > > > Nonsense, Tim, > > > > Awarenes is not a field, it is a flow, flux. > > Nonetheless, this is happiness, freedom. you got that right. i'm laughing like crazy. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.