Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > BobN > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:36 PM > Re: Dan as the moderator? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > the great irony is that nonduality groups, for a belief system that claims > > there's no " me " , they attract some of the most eccentric > > personalities...but > > then again no one ever said nonduality was not strange. > > -hur- > > > > Belief system? > > -geo- > > do you systematically believe that strange? > > .b b.b. > > " believe that strange? Dont understand.... > -geo- yes.. we've gone over this. you evidently don't read much English literature.. nor get out much. it's ok. i don't believe that strange. ..b b.b. > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ac what IS your problem? > > > > > > > > > we start the journey fascinated with the IS... and somehow end up with > > > > the " your " ...maybe this is why IS comes here to deliver personal > > > > insults > > > > to " yours. " > > > > > > > > > is it? > > > > > > what it is... > > > > > > if there are " personal " anythings.. > > > > > > there is a " your " and " mine " . > > > > > > insults are applicable only to a " you " or a " me " ... > > > > > > a them or a those. > > > > > > the lore of yore: > > > > > > in days of yore the " your " of " you " 're visited by no other. > > > > > > tidings of great comfort and joy. > > > > > > only THAT.. > > > > > > no me to see.. > > > > > > no thee no three. > > > > > > is is? > > > > > > now is then. > > > > > > tomorrow never knows. > > > > > > who boos? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 - Hur Guler Nisargadatta Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:16 PM Re: Dan as the moderator? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > > > > the great irony is that nonduality groups, for a belief system that claims > there's no " me " , they attract some of the most eccentric > personalities...but > then again no one ever said nonduality was not strange. > -hur- > > Belief system? > -geo- > yes, there's a santa claus. -hur- The point is that for a belief system its not THAT strange. What else could one expect from believers? :>) But not all are believers here.... I believe LOL -geo- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 - Hur Guler Nisargadatta Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:21 PM Re: Dan as the moderator? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > > > > Marc...go have some rest. You have nothing more to say. > > -geo- > > > > lol > > > > and then geo feel to say something.....whatever.... > > > > again.... > > > > like others " without ego " ....who need to talk...and moderate....and talk > > > > and discuss....and talk....again...and again > > > > lol > > > > Marc > > > > OK...now that you have rested a bit - you may resume your teaching > > -gog- > > > > that's really what we do here. we blow a life into the clay personal jesus > as our avatars and let them battle it all out. it's our ape nature that > loves this tribal wars at personal level. > -hur- > > That is not all we do here - IMHO. Not always an illusion of a personal > jesus or avatar is in play - not at all. > Sometimes there is the awareness of non-duality and it is voiced. No need > for some personality for that. > -geo- > there may be no need for personality conflicts here but nevertheless it's here. you can't deny there's no pain/pleasure of conflict. -hur- In the list? Yes. It is always an heterogeneous gang. In life also, yes. But not always. Once it is seen that it is just a programmed reactionary game one may step out of it.....and still keep it going " as if " there was a personality in the game. Stillness seeing. -geo- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > the great irony is that nonduality groups, for a belief system that claims there's no " me " , they attract some of the most eccentric personalities...but then again no one ever said nonduality was not strange. it's a pair o' ducks. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Hur Guler > Nisargadatta > Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:21 PM > Re: Dan as the moderator? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Marc...go have some rest. You have nothing more to say. > > > -geo- > > > > > > lol > > > > > > and then geo feel to say something.....whatever.... > > > > > > again.... > > > > > > like others " without ego " ....who need to talk...and moderate....and talk > > > > > > and discuss....and talk....again...and again > > > > > > lol > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > OK...now that you have rested a bit - you may resume your teaching > > > -gog- > > > > > > > that's really what we do here. we blow a life into the clay personal jesus > > as our avatars and let them battle it all out. it's our ape nature that > > loves this tribal wars at personal level. > > -hur- > > > > That is not all we do here - IMHO. Not always an illusion of a personal > > jesus or avatar is in play - not at all. > > Sometimes there is the awareness of non-duality and it is voiced. No need > > for some personality for that. > > -geo- > > > there may be no need for personality conflicts here but nevertheless it's > here. you can't deny there's no pain/pleasure of conflict. > -hur- > > In the list? Yes. It is always an heterogeneous gang. In life also, yes. But > not always. Once it is seen that it is just a programmed reactionary game > one may step out of it.....and still keep it going " as if " there was a > personality in the game. Stillness seeing. > -geo- oh be still! behave! ROFLMAO! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? At many places, Hur Ji! And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. And, I think question before is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > Dear Hur ji: In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: GuruRatings/ It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. With much respect, ac Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > And, I think question before is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > GuruRatings/ > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > With much respect, > ac > That's wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too funny Arvind. I suppose I was the *excessive member who *terrorized* the list? Who Sarlo was afraid would have *brought down the (House of Sarlo-list*? So I had to be removed once again? Tell me, how the hell can one person bring down the list? Afaik (or remember) I was the one who was continually *attacked* by the regulars. Sarlo maybe just a bit hardhearted and closed-minded (senility creeping in?), maybe just too used to his role as policeman stemming from Osho days? Does he really want a dead list? I mean the less people there are, the less variety of folks who bring different *issues/thoughts*!) to the group, well doesn't it kinda get stale? And let me reiterate: if you want a *quiet* list, without *controversy* and *drama*, may I suggest every one turn off their computer, TV, burn all the books, and return to their respective caves and meditate on cobwebs and bugs. Most of us have done the navel thing. I remember you always got a lot of shit even at EOTS (and at Sarlo's dump). Somehow you eluded being ousted. I really think he's afraid of me, cause every time I show up he has to face who he is really, and that's not as pretty a picture he would like to think. I feel sadness for his partner. ~A Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 [...] Searching for Anna at Guru Ratings: GuruRatings/msearch?query=anna & submit=Search & chars\ et=ISO-8859-1 .... Your search has returned more than 5000 results. Please try again with a more specific search. .... I think Sarlo complained many times about your volume and put you on moderation many times because of that. > That's wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too funny Arvind. I suppose I was the *excessive member who *terrorized* the list? Who Sarlo was afraid would have *brought down the (House of Sarlo-list*? > > So I had to be removed once again? I think Sarlo explained why he removed you this time. I think he said that he removed you because you posted same poem three times. > > Tell me, how the hell can one person bring down the list? Afaik (or remember) I was the one who was continually *attacked* by the regulars. > Why were you " continually attacked " ? " Who all " were attacking you? I think almost every poster at Guru Ratings was the target of attacks, conflict one time or another including myself. > Sarlo maybe just a bit hardhearted and closed-minded (senility creeping in?), maybe just too used to his role as policeman stemming from Osho days? > > Does he really want a dead list? That is not a " dead " list. GuruRatings/ Activity within 7 days: 281 New Messages - 11 New Photos > I mean the less people there are, the less variety of folks who bring different *issues/thoughts*!) to the group, well doesn't it kinda get stale? > Guru Ratings has many excellent discussions going on. Like this one: GuruRatings/message/194937 .... > And let me reiterate: if you want a *quiet* list, without *controversy* and *drama*, may I suggest every one turn off their computer, TV, burn all the books, and return to their respective caves and meditate on cobwebs and bugs. > I recommend that you keep that suggestion to yourself! Where did you read me suggest that. I have been talking about just one member, that too because, Hur ji, the moderator and owner of this list raised that " issue " . > Most of us have done the navel thing. > > I remember you always got a lot of shit even at EOTS And, after some time, the list itself closed down, I think. Did it close down? Maybe, it closed down because, the moderator/owner didn't take " reasonable " action in time and allowed one member to destroy the list for everyone! >(and at Sarlo's > dump). Somehow you eluded being ousted. I used to be more " problematic " than I am now. I have tried to learn from my " experience " as well as from my " critics " . What have you learned from your " critics " , Anna Ji? Is it to never find anything wrong with you? Is it to insist that 'I am always right' and others are always wrong whenever they point to any fault in me? > I really think he's afraid of me, cause every time I show up he has to face who he is really, and that's not as pretty a picture he would like to think. > I suspect that you grossly over-estimate yourself! {See, I can be 'confrontational' too! I haven't even called A***le, C**t or B***h. All that I think those are not really necessary.} > I feel sadness for his partner. I suspect your sadness is misplaced. Maybe, you should direct it towards you! (See, confrontational and dramatic again and also creating 'conflicts' :-) And, I am even laughing (, which I many times do, ) without having to 'pretend' to 'others' to do so via... LOL ROFLOL ROFLMAO Har... Har... and, other grossly idiotic, stupid, immature and childish ways! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > And, I think question before is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > GuruRatings/ > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > With much respect, > ac hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. you pour little obsessed twerp. let's lookie at da situation acie: YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. and using billingsgate. yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. and conceited and childish. YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. baba has capitalized every YOU because... YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. you're pathetic really. YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. but that's just my opinion of YOU. i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. isn't that nice and sweet of me? sure it is. so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. there you go and.. there it is. thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. :-) ..b b.b. p.s. now remember my paranoid little friend.. please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! please don't try and come live with me. PULEEEZE!... you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! LOL! with no respect at all.. [.bx3] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2010 we sound like a big family fighting over dinner table...instead of saying pass the salt, something freudian comes up, " you ruined my perfect spiritual experience you sob! " Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > And, I think question before is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > ac > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. > > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > and using billingsgate. > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > and conceited and childish. > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > > in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. > > do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? > > YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. > > YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. > > YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. > > baba has capitalized every YOU because... > > YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. > > you're pathetic really. > > YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. > > but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. > > but that's just my opinion of YOU. > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. > > and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. > > isn't that nice and sweet of me? > > sure it is. > > so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. > > now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. > > there you go and.. > > there it is. > > thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. > > :-) > > .b b.b. > > > p.s. > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! > > please don't try and come live with me. > > PULEEEZE!... > > you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! > > LOL! > > with no respect at all.. > > [.bx3] > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 that's true. uhm.. would you please pass the Jungian Tabasco sauce? i need some on my crab cakes. :-) ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > we sound like a big family fighting over dinner table...instead of saying pass the salt, something freudian comes up, " you ruined my perfect spiritual experience you sob! " > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > > > And, I think question before is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. > > > > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > > > and using billingsgate. > > > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. > > > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > > > and conceited and childish. > > > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > > > > in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. > > > > do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? > > > > YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. > > > > YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. > > > > YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. > > > > baba has capitalized every YOU because... > > > > YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. > > > > you're pathetic really. > > > > YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. > > > > but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. > > > > but that's just my opinion of YOU. > > > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. > > > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. > > > > and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. > > > > isn't that nice and sweet of me? > > > > sure it is. > > > > so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. > > > > now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. > > > > there you go and.. > > > > there it is. > > > > thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > p.s. > > > > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! > > > > please don't try and come live with me. > > > > PULEEEZE!... > > > > you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! > > > > LOL! > > > > with no respect at all.. > > > > [.bx3] > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > And, I think question before you is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to moderate each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > ac > > Did I make my squirm, Bob ji? You sound like a leech under salt! > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. > I don't think you need to prove your dishonesty again and again, Bob ji! This is what I wrote: Nisargadatta/message/83581 .... *(I am not saying that Bobji to (is) a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) .... But, I guess as long as you are dishonest and are willing to lie, you can say anything you want and twist everything the way like. It is up to the readers to examine and see the truth. The astute readers can dig and see the truth. Those who are not, can potentially be mislead by you. > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > and using billingsgate. > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. When did I " pretend " that? If you translate " getting enlightened " means having permanently lost 'ego', that is your problem or... maybe, your dishonesty, again! > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > and conceited and childish. Unnecessary adjectives... I explained many times that I am mainly objecting to a behavior which I find disruptive and not just reacting to a personal insult. > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > I think I have been more 'direct', confrontational, critical, accusatory towards the moderator than most posters I have read here. Just re-read the very message you replied to. Here it is: .... > Dear Hur ji: > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) .... Contrast that with " how " you talk to the moderator versus how you talk to other 'non authority' members. Were you just acting dishonest once again and hoping that no one will 'see' it? Does it even make sense to ask it? Are you honest enough to admit to your own dishonesty? I guess not. > in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. > > do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? Yes, I think it is because you are " hurting " , and, because, you are angry! Am I correct? But, again it comes down to honesty. Are you really honest enough to admit that? I guess not... > > YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. > > YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. > > YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. > > baba has capitalized every YOU because... > > YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. > > you're pathetic really. > > YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. > > but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. > > but that's just my opinion of YOU. And, I must say that these opinion of yours are as stupid, ignorant, useless and dishonest as they often are! > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. Yes, you have right to keep acting stupid, ignorant and dishonest! > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. I have opinion of your current behavior on this list. > > and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. > Dishonesty can be a great weapon... but, only if the readers are stupid, ignorant or lazy! > isn't that nice and sweet of me? > > sure it is. > > so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. > > now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. > > there you go and.. > > there it is. > > thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. > > :-) > > .b b.b. > > > p.s. > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! Yes, Bob ji! That will be " bad " result of this 'conflict'! And, that is why I think it is a duty of moderator to be vigilant. Ordinary members like you and me have no 'authority' and in trying to " fix " each other, we can create endless avoidable conflicts. And, if one of them is a 'maniac' kind (, which is many times not known until it happens), many disastrous results can occur! That's why I think moderator needs to decide and 'step in' whenever needed. As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) I don't think it is " ok " to leave kids to 'fight it among themselves' and 'resolve it by fighting'. School teacher is there for a purpose. Moderator is there is there for a purpose... As is often said: ====== With the power, comes Responsibility! ===== See, Bob... Unlike you, I am again taking moderator to the task and I am reminding him of his duty! Do you get it now? I guess, not! And, even if you did, are you likely to admit it? I think not! [NNB] For your 'personal' reading Pleasure, Bob Ji: LOL ROFLOL ROFLMAO Ha Ha ha Ha Ha Har Har Har > > please don't try and come live with me. > > PULEEEZE!... > > you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! > > LOL! > > with no respect at all.. > > [.bx3] > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > we sound like a big family fighting over dinner table...instead of saying pass the salt, something freudian comes up, " you ruined my perfect spiritual experience you sob! " > I think it is up to you, Hur Ji! Remove bob Ji! Keep Bob Ji! Ultimately, as an owner and moderator, it is your responsibility and duty. I think you asked for opinion and I expressed mine. I do think he makes this dysfunctional by needlessly replying to almost every post (, especially when you are not active) and by needlessly insulting almost every member who questions him. I think I should leave this heated " family discussion " now! Frankly speaking, whenever I enter this kind of " heated discussions " , I start thinking of my personal safety too. I know many people take whatever happens on the list, quite " personally " ! 'Angrier' and more 'aggressive' a personality type, more I suspect that to be the case. With best wishes, ac [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > > > And, I think question before you is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to moderate each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > (twerp ac) : > Did I make my squirm, Bob ji? > > You sound like a leech under salt! (.b b.b.) : squirm??? ROFLMAO! no my little worm tis thee who squirms.. what a strange little twit you are kid! suck on that salt awhile jiggles. LOL! > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. (twerp ac) : > I don't think you need to prove your dishonesty again and again, Bob ji! This is what I wrote: > > > Nisargadatta/message/83581 > > ... > > *(I am not saying that Bobji to (is) a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) (.b b.b.) : ac.. you have selectively picked the LAST of your abusive posts. the one wherein you coyly try again to have me banned. well dork.. it didn't work. and this attempted deception wont either... go back over you paranoid and hysterical postings.. of the days previous. your trying to be devious but as with everything else you try.. you're failing miserably at it. you can't handle the truth about yourself. frankly punk it's no wonder. :-) )twerp ac) : > But, I guess as long as you are dishonest and are willing to lie, you can say anything you want and twist everything the way like. It is up to the readers to examine and see the truth. The astute readers can dig and see the truth. Those who are not, can potentially be mislead by you. READERS?????? are YOU nuts? do you think anyone else cares about this crap? get a grip ac! IF anyone has been following this little soap opera.. (which i sincerely doubt).. they already know that it's YOU who are lying now kid. it's up to you to fess up to the truth. go back over your hysterical postings again. review and ponder: " what kind of little paranoid asshole am i? " that would be a good start for you. then.. don't piss and moan and try and deny what you've done. admit that you're a creep and get on with the game. LOL! > > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > > > and using billingsgate. > > > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. (twerp ac): > When did I " pretend " that? (.b b.b.) read the " Google " skit quoting you that Pete posted for one. the list goes on but you seem to forget what you've said. all the time. you're a lost lunatic son. :-) (twerp ac) : > If you translate " getting enlightened " means having permanently lost 'ego', that is your problem or... maybe, your dishonesty, again! (.b b.b.) ac.. there is no such thing as enlightenment. what you're calling " getting enlightened " is a farce. if and when Realization or Enlightenment IS.. no longer is there a personality..ego..self.. ESPECIALLY not a twerp-like one like your own. how enlightening is the attempt to ban " others " ??? if you're so friggin' enlightened.. where do these " others " fit into the grand non-dualistic theme? it's NOT a theme with you kiddo it's a patently absurd scheme.. residing in your ridiculous childish dream. watch cartoons kiddo.. you'll get more out of it then your own bullshit will ever provide. > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > > > and conceited and childish. (twerp ac) : > Unnecessary adjectives... > > I explained many times that I am mainly objecting to a behavior which I find disruptive and not just reacting to a personal insult. twerp is not an adjective. oh you must mean: resentful..hysterical..childish.. well no those aren't unnecessary at all. they are descriptive and you don't like the truth of them. that's because you are a conceited (for no good reason) twit. NOW listen here.. focus...focus. no more hocus-pocus.. you must NEVER meditate if you find such small banter " disruptive " . again with the " personal " insult? so you're a self involved enlightened being huh? uh huh. LOL! > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > > (twerp ac): > I think I have been more 'direct', confrontational, critical, accusatory towards the moderator than most posters I have read here. Just re-read the very message you replied to. Here it is: > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > ... > > > Contrast that with " how " you talk to the moderator versus how you talk to other 'non authority' members. oh that cutsie little " :-) " ! so offensive! yeah right. and why didn't you finish quoting the TOTALITY of that post ac? because again you are being selective to cover you're putrid ass. and why not post the other suck up posts to Hur that you've laid out.. throughout the past few days? because they don't fit in with your bullshit cover-up that's why. you're repetitive action of calling me dishonest.. is an obvious deflection from your own insipid obliquity. and from your guilt of that dishonesty you try and project it on me. get real with yourself you little nutzoid. you'd be sickening if you weren't so hilarious. i think that's what's really pissing you off. it's that i laugh at you not that i find you ridiculous. but gee kid.. they sort of go together. :-) (twerp ac) : > Were you just acting dishonest once again and hoping that no one will 'see' it? > > Does it even make sense to ask it? > > Are you honest enough to admit to your own dishonesty? > > I guess not. (.b b.b.) : there you go projecting again. maybe you are beginning to see exactly what you are. good job twerp. keep it up. but keep it to yourself and don't try and foist it off on me. you'll be glad for yourself you'll see. :-) > > in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. > > > > do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? (twerp ac) : > Yes, I think it is because you are " hurting " , and, because, you are angry! > > Am I correct? (.b b.b.) : " correct " ? no. the reason i think you're a twit is.. because of what i said. read it again kid. " hurting " ? OMG! the only thing hurting are my sides from laughing at you. " angry " ? not a bit. i'm actually thankful to have you as a toy. i'm lovin it kid! :-) (twerp ac) : > But, again it comes down to honesty. Are you really honest enough to admit that? I guess not... (.b b.b.) : this " honesty obsession of yours shows conclusively.. that honesty..being honest etc... is a BIG ISSUE with you. you realize you are a phony with others and even yourself. this is the why of your irrational projection of your own dishonesty.. onto " others " . it is the M.O. of your unhealthy and compulsive preoccupation with baba and his motiveless engagement and enjoyment with you. i don't expect a twerp like you to understand this. it likely would seem to hurtful though it's designed to be helpful. give us a smile now! that's a boy! > > YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. > > > > YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. > > > > YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. > > > > baba has capitalized every YOU because... > > > > YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. > > > > you're pathetic really. > > > > YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. > > > > but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. > > > > but that's just my opinion of YOU. (twerp ac) : > And, I must say that these opinion of yours are as stupid, ignorant, useless and dishonest as they often are! (.b b.b.) in the words of that famous philosopher.. who is relatively slow in mental and emotional development: " too many adjectives. " LOL! you set up your own pratfalls twerp. this is GREAT! :-) > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. (twerp ac) : > Yes, you have right to keep acting stupid, ignorant and dishonest! (.b b.b.) : again in the words of that retarded... well shucks you already know what those words are. unless you've already forgotten. it doesn't matter. but it's funny anyway. thanks again for the material! > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. > (twerp ac.) : > I have opinion of your current behavior on this list. > (.b b.b.) : gee.. somehow that doesn't move me. i really don't care. > > and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. (twerp ac) : > Dishonesty can be a great weapon... but, only if the readers are stupid, ignorant or lazy! so you think your own dishonesty.. projected or not... is a " weapon " ??? OMG! no wonder you can't win. LOL! > > isn't that nice and sweet of me? > > > > sure it is. > > > > so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. > > > > now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. > > > > there you go and.. > > > > there it is. > > > > thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > p.s. > > > > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! (twerp ac) : > Yes, Bob ji! That will be " bad " result of this 'conflict'! And, that is why I think it is a duty of moderator to be vigilant. (.b b.b.) ROFLMAO! you can't be serious. go ahead. i double dog dare you ac. do your down and dirty best to do that " bad stuff " . hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! you need a couple of tranquilizers son. (twerp ac) : > Ordinary members like you and me have no 'authority' and in trying to " fix " each other, we can create endless avoidable conflicts. And, if one of them is a 'maniac' kind (, which is many times not known until it happens), many disastrous results can occur! That's why I think moderator needs to decide and 'step in' whenever needed. (.b b.b.) : maybe i was wrong above.. maybe you need to break those pills in two next time kiddo. you're stepping on the threshold of deranged here. but gosh dang it all it's funny to watch. LOL! (twerp ac) : > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) (.b b.b.) : it's not problematic at all twerp. that's when the fun begins! i'm sure you're enjoying it too. if not..too bad. i am. :-) (twerp ac) : > I don't think it is " ok " to leave kids to 'fight it among themselves' and 'resolve it by fighting'. School teacher is there for a purpose. Moderator is there is there for a purpose... > > As is often said: > > ====== With the power, comes Responsibility! ===== > > > See, Bob... > > Unlike you, I am again taking moderator to the task and I am reminding him of his duty! > > Do you get it now? > > I guess, not! And, even if you did, are you likely to admit it? I think not! (.b b.b.) : well kid.. i cannot tell i lie. yes i get it. you're a a weak and obviously defenseless twerp... with no sense of fun or humor. that's that. so sad and all that. :-) (twerp ac) : > [NNB] > > For your 'personal' reading Pleasure, Bob Ji: > > > LOL > ROFLOL > ROFLMAO > > > Ha Ha ha Ha Ha > > Har Har Har (.b b.b.) : that's the stuff twerp! LOL! > > please don't try and come live with me. > > > > PULEEEZE!... > > > > you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! > > > > LOL! > > > > with no respect at all.. > > > > [.bx3] > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > we sound like a big family fighting over dinner table...instead of saying pass the salt, something freudian comes up, " you ruined my perfect spiritual experience you sob! " > > > > I think it is up to you, Hur Ji! > > Remove bob Ji! Keep Bob Ji! Ultimately, as an owner and moderator, it is your responsibility and duty. > > I think you asked for opinion and I expressed mine. I do think he makes this dysfunctional by needlessly replying to almost every post (, especially when you are not active) and by needlessly insulting almost every member who questions him. > > I think I should leave this heated " family discussion " now! Frankly speaking, whenever I enter this kind of " heated discussions " , I start thinking of my personal safety too. I know many people take whatever happens on the list, quite " personally " ! 'Angrier' and more 'aggressive' a personality type, more I suspect that to be the case. > > With best wishes, > ac thanks for the laughs ac! LOL! ..b b.b. p.s. ac... a question.. who exactly do you think is acting angry here? just a thought kid. [.bx3] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > > > And, I think question before you is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to moderate each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > (twerp ac) : > Did I make my squirm, Bob ji? > > You sound like a leech under salt! (.b b.b.) : squirm??? ROFLMAO! no my little worm tis thee who squirms.. what a strange little twit you are kid! suck on that salt awhile jiggles. LOL! > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. (twerp ac) : > I don't think you need to prove your dishonesty again and again, Bob ji! This is what I wrote: > > > Nisargadatta/message/83581 > > ... > > *(I am not saying that Bobji to (is) a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) (.b b.b.) : ac.. you have selectively picked the LAST of your abusive posts. the one wherein you coyly try again to have me banned. well dork.. it didn't work. and this attempted deception wont either... go back over you paranoid and hysterical postings.. of the days previous. your trying to be devious but as with everything else you try.. you're failing miserably at it. you can't handle the truth about yourself. frankly punk it's no wonder. :-) )twerp ac) : > But, I guess as long as you are dishonest and are willing to lie, you can say anything you want and twist everything the way like. It is up to the readers to examine and see the truth. The astute readers can dig and see the truth. Those who are not, can potentially be mislead by you. READERS?????? are YOU nuts? do you think anyone else cares about this crap? get a grip ac! IF anyone has been following this little soap opera.. (which i sincerely doubt).. they already know that it's YOU who are lying now kid. it's up to you to fess up to the truth. go back over your hysterical postings again. review and ponder: " what kind of little paranoid asshole am i? " that would be a good start for you. then.. don't piss and moan and try and deny what you've done. admit that you're a creep and get on with the game. LOL! > > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > > > and using billingsgate. > > > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. (twerp ac): > When did I " pretend " that? (.b b.b.) read the " Google " skit quoting you that Pete posted for one. the list goes on but you seem to forget what you've said. all the time. you're a lost lunatic son. :-) (twerp ac) : > If you translate " getting enlightened " means having permanently lost 'ego', that is your problem or... maybe, your dishonesty, again! (.b b.b.) ac.. there is no such thing as enlightenment. what you're calling " getting enlightened " is a farce. if and when Realization or Enlightenment IS.. no longer is there a personality..ego..self.. ESPECIALLY not a twerp-like one like your own. how enlightening is the attempt to ban " others " ??? if you're so friggin' enlightened.. where do these " others " fit into the grand non-dualistic theme? it's NOT a theme with you kiddo it's a patently absurd scheme.. residing in your ridiculous childish dream. watch cartoons kiddo.. you'll get more out of it then your own bullshit will ever provide. > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > > > and conceited and childish. (twerp ac) : > Unnecessary adjectives... > > I explained many times that I am mainly objecting to a behavior which I find disruptive and not just reacting to a personal insult. twerp is not an adjective. oh you must mean: resentful..hysterical..childish.. well no those aren't unnecessary at all. they are descriptive and you don't like the truth of them. that's because you are a conceited (for no good reason) twit. NOW listen here.. focus...focus. no more hocus-pocus.. you must NEVER meditate if you find such small banter " disruptive " . again with the " personal " insult? so you're a self involved enlightened being huh? uh huh. LOL! > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > > (twerp ac): > I think I have been more 'direct', confrontational, critical, accusatory towards the moderator than most posters I have read here. Just re-read the very message you replied to. Here it is: > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > ... > > > Contrast that with " how " you talk to the moderator versus how you talk to other 'non authority' members. oh that cutsie little " :-) " ! so offensive! yeah right. and why didn't you finish quoting the TOTALITY of that post ac? because again you are being selective to cover you're putrid ass. and why not post the other suck up posts to Hur that you've laid out.. throughout the past few days? because they don't fit in with your bullshit cover-up that's why. you're repetitive action of calling me dishonest.. is an obvious deflection from your own insipid obliquity. and from your guilt of that dishonesty you try and project it on me. get real with yourself you little nutzoid. you'd be sickening if you weren't so hilarious. i think that's what's really pissing you off. it's that i laugh at you not that i find you ridiculous. but gee kid.. they sort of go together. :-) (twerp ac) : > Were you just acting dishonest once again and hoping that no one will 'see' it? > > Does it even make sense to ask it? > > Are you honest enough to admit to your own dishonesty? > > I guess not. (.b b.b.) : there you go projecting again. maybe you are beginning to see exactly what you are. good job twerp. keep it up. but keep it to yourself and don't try and foist it off on me. you'll be glad for yourself you'll see. :-) > > in order to curry favor and have YOUR petty desires done. > > > > do YOU yet wonder WHY baba feels that YOU are a little phony twit? (twerp ac) : > Yes, I think it is because you are " hurting " , and, because, you are angry! > > Am I correct? (.b b.b.) : " correct " ? no. the reason i think you're a twit is.. because of what i said. read it again kid. " hurting " ? OMG! the only thing hurting are my sides from laughing at you. " angry " ? not a bit. i'm actually thankful to have you as a toy. i'm lovin it kid! :-) (twerp ac) : > But, again it comes down to honesty. Are you really honest enough to admit that? I guess not... (.b b.b.) : this " honesty obsession of yours shows conclusively.. that honesty..being honest etc... is a BIG ISSUE with you. you realize you are a phony with others and even yourself. this is the why of your irrational projection of your own dishonesty.. onto " others " . it is the M.O. of your unhealthy and compulsive preoccupation with baba and his motiveless engagement and enjoyment with you. i don't expect a twerp like you to understand this. it likely would seem to hurtful though it's designed to be helpful. give us a smile now! that's a boy! > > YOU are a petty tyrant like most two year old minds. > > > > YOU need to grow up and quit pretending. > > > > YOU are the most " unspiritual " little fart i have ever encountered. > > > > baba has capitalized every YOU because... > > > > YOU think YOU are the most important thing in the world. > > > > you're pathetic really. > > > > YOU sound like a kid not only with mental and spiritual problems.. > > > > but likely also sexual..social..physical..and health problems too. > > > > but that's just my opinion of YOU. (twerp ac) : > And, I must say that these opinion of yours are as stupid, ignorant, useless and dishonest as they often are! (.b b.b.) in the words of that famous philosopher.. who is relatively slow in mental and emotional development: " too many adjectives. " LOL! you set up your own pratfalls twerp. this is GREAT! :-) > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. (twerp ac) : > Yes, you have right to keep acting stupid, ignorant and dishonest! (.b b.b.) : again in the words of that retarded... well shucks you already know what those words are. unless you've already forgotten. it doesn't matter. but it's funny anyway. thanks again for the material! > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. > (twerp ac.) : > I have opinion of your current behavior on this list. > (.b b.b.) : gee.. somehow that doesn't move me. i really don't care. > > and i am nowhere calling you perverted or a criminal..like YOU do me. (twerp ac) : > Dishonesty can be a great weapon... but, only if the readers are stupid, ignorant or lazy! so you think your own dishonesty.. projected or not... is a " weapon " ??? OMG! no wonder you can't win. LOL! > > isn't that nice and sweet of me? > > > > sure it is. > > > > so reflect on that and genuflect on those hard knock knees toward me. > > > > now let's enjoy a nice laugh together and have done with this banter. > > > > there you go and.. > > > > there it is. > > > > thanks for providing baba with Exactly what he is looking for. > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > p.s. > > > > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! (twerp ac) : > Yes, Bob ji! That will be " bad " result of this 'conflict'! And, that is why I think it is a duty of moderator to be vigilant. (.b b.b.) ROFLMAO! you can't be serious. go ahead. i double dog dare you ac. do your down and dirty best to do that " bad stuff " . hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! you need a couple of tranquilizers son. (twerp ac) : > Ordinary members like you and me have no 'authority' and in trying to " fix " each other, we can create endless avoidable conflicts. And, if one of them is a 'maniac' kind (, which is many times not known until it happens), many disastrous results can occur! That's why I think moderator needs to decide and 'step in' whenever needed. (.b b.b.) : maybe i was wrong above.. maybe you need to break those pills in two next time kiddo. you're stepping on the threshold of deranged here. but gosh dang it all it's funny to watch. LOL! (twerp ac) : > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) (.b b.b.) : it's not problematic at all twerp. that's when the fun begins! i'm sure you're enjoying it too. if not..too bad. i am. :-) (twerp ac) : > I don't think it is " ok " to leave kids to 'fight it among themselves' and 'resolve it by fighting'. School teacher is there for a purpose. Moderator is there is there for a purpose... > > As is often said: > > ====== With the power, comes Responsibility! ===== > > > See, Bob... > > Unlike you, I am again taking moderator to the task and I am reminding him of his duty! > > Do you get it now? > > I guess, not! And, even if you did, are you likely to admit it? I think not! (.b b.b.) : well kid.. i cannot tell i lie. yes i get it. you're a a weak and obviously defenseless twerp... with no sense of fun or humor. that's that. so sad and all that. :-) (twerp ac) : > [NNB] > > For your 'personal' reading Pleasure, Bob Ji: > > > LOL > ROFLOL > ROFLMAO > > > Ha Ha ha Ha Ha > > Har Har Har (.b b.b.) : that's the stuff twerp! LOL! > > please don't try and come live with me. > > > > PULEEEZE!... > > > > you just might make me laugh so hard i'll split a gut! > > > > LOL! > > > > with no respect at all.. > > > > [.bx3] > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 [...] > > (twerp ac) : > > > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > it's not problematic at all twerp. > > that's when the fun begins! An eloquent poster wrote once: When you fight with a pig, both of you will get dirty; however, pig is the only one who will enjoy it! [NNB] > > i'm sure you're enjoying it too. > > if not..too bad. > > i am. > > :-) > [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 [...] > > > > > > > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > > > > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > > > > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > > > > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! > > > (twerp ac) : > > > Yes, Bob ji! That will be " bad " result of this 'conflict'! And, that is why I think it is a duty of moderator to be vigilant. > > > > (.b b.b.) > > ROFLMAO! > > you can't be serious. > > go ahead. > > i double dog dare you ac. > > do your down and dirty best to do that " bad stuff " . I am concerned about your mental stability, Bob Ji! You comes across as a lunatic type to me and that is the cause of my concern. Feel safe from my side. I have intention and no reason to do anything " bad " to you or anyone else here. I hope you are not too attached to this forum. And, I hope that my recommendation that you be removed in order to maintain the sanity on this forum, doesn't cause you any pain, anguish or anger. > > hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! > > you need a couple of tranquilizers son. > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > Ordinary members like you and me have no 'authority' and in trying to " fix " each other, we can create endless avoidable conflicts. And, if one of them is a 'maniac' kind (, which is many times not known until it happens), many disastrous results can occur! That's why I think moderator needs to decide and 'step in' whenever needed. > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > maybe i was wrong above.. > > maybe you need to break those pills in two next time kiddo. > > you're stepping on the threshold of deranged here. > > but gosh dang it all it's funny to watch. > > LOL! > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) > [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > > > > > And, I think question before you is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to moderate each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > ac > > > > > > > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > Did I make you squirm, Bob ji? > > > > You sound like a leech under salt! > > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > squirm??? Good. I wouldn't want to cause you any pain. I hope it is OK for me to recommend that you be removed and I hope it doesn't cause you any pain. Causing you hurt is not my intention. Asking Hur Ji to maintain an environment where people can post and talk freely without feeling intimidated, threatened or subjected to excessive abuse is my intention. I hope that is OK with you. [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 [...] > > > )twerp ac) : > > > But, I guess as long as you are dishonest and are willing to lie, you can say anything you want and twist everything the way like. It is up to the readers to examine and see the truth. The astute readers can dig and see the truth. Those who are not, can potentially be mislead by you. > > > READERS?????? > > are YOU nuts? > > do you think anyone else cares about this crap? If you really think you and I are the only two reading this thread, then I recommend that you mail your replies to me in place of wasting space here. I don't think that is the case, that's why I post on the forum. > > get a grip ac! > > IF anyone has been following this little soap opera.. > > (which i sincerely doubt).. > > they already know that it's YOU who are lying now kid. > > it's up to you to fess up to the truth. > > go back over your hysterical postings again. > > review and ponder: > > " what kind of little paranoid asshole am i? " > > that would be a good start for you. > > then.. > > don't piss and moan and try and deny what you've done. > > admit that you're a creep and get on with the game. > > LOL! > > [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 [...] > > > > i should be free to have an opinion of YOU.. > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > Yes, you have right to keep acting stupid, ignorant and dishonest! > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > again in the words of that retarded... > > well shucks you already know what those words are. > > unless you've already forgotten. > > it doesn't matter. > > but it's funny anyway. > > thanks again for the material! > > > > > > as you seem to feel that you should be free to have one of me. > > > > > > (twerp ac.) : > > > I have opinion of your current behavior on this list. > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > gee.. > > somehow that doesn't move me. > > i really don't care. > Do you care what other members think of your current behavior on this list? Do care what Hur Ji, the man with authority on this list, thinks of your current behavior on this list? [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you see where else you guys can go and talk to each other freely? > > > > > > > > At many places, Hur Ji! > > > > > > > > And, some places try to make sure that one member doesn't become so excessive, aggressive or abusive that he/she prevents everybody else from talking freely. > > > > > > > > And, I think question before you is not to whether moderate this group or nor or whether to try to moderate each and everything on this group or not, it simply " what to do with one member who repeatedly goes overboard and makes the group dysfunctional " . You, yourself described the situation perfectly by asking " what to do with Bob? " . I think that is the " issue " and nothing else. I have not heard anybody suggest that you should moderate each and every members. Most other members have shown themselves to be capable of moderating themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have serious nondual discussions at moderated nonduality groups and when you're convinced that you are walking gods then you're welcome to come here and tell us what you REALLY think about each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > > > > > > > I am not a personal 'moderation messiah' asking every group to be moderated. And, had you not asked the question of " what to do with Bob " , it was likely that I might not have bothered writing anything about Bob :-) > > > > > > > > And, frankly, I think there are nondual groups, which are still far more confrontational than this group. Guru Ratings is one such group: > > > > > > > > GuruRatings/ > > > > > > > > It used to be called " tiger's den " , " Snakes pit " by many people and still has lot of bite. Difference is that Sarlo is more vigilant now an excessive member is not allowed to bring down the list, anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > ac > > > > > > > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > Did I make you squirm, Bob ji? > > > > You sound like a leech under salt! > > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > squirm??? > > ROFLMAO! > > no my little worm tis thee who squirms.. > > what a strange little twit you are kid! > > suck on that salt awhile jiggles. > > LOL! > > > hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa... > > > > > > here be da ghostie dat be haunting your world. > > > > > > you pour little obsessed twerp. > > > > > > let's lookie at da situation acie: > > > > > > YOU call me a murderer..rapist..robber..child molester.. > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > I don't think you need to prove your dishonesty again and again, Bob ji! This is what I wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta/message/83581 > > > > ... > > > > *(I am not saying that Bobji to (is) a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > ac.. > > you have selectively picked the LAST of your abusive posts. > > the one wherein you coyly try again to have me banned. > > well dork.. > > it didn't work. > > and this attempted deception wont either... > > go back over you paranoid and hysterical postings.. > > of the days previous. > > your trying to be devious but as with everything else you try.. > > you're failing miserably at it. > > you can't handle the truth about yourself. > > frankly punk it's no wonder. > > :-) > > > > )twerp ac) : > > > But, I guess as long as you are dishonest and are willing to lie, you can say anything you want and twist everything the way like. It is up to the readers to examine and see the truth. The astute readers can dig and see the truth. Those who are not, can potentially be mislead by you. > > > READERS?????? > > are YOU nuts? > > do you think anyone else cares about this crap? > > get a grip ac! > > IF anyone has been following this little soap opera.. > > (which i sincerely doubt).. > > they already know that it's YOU who are lying now kid. > > it's up to you to fess up to the truth. > > go back over your hysterical postings again. > > review and ponder: > > " what kind of little paranoid asshole am i? " > > that would be a good start for you. > > then.. > > don't piss and moan and try and deny what you've done. > > admit that you're a creep and get on with the game. > > LOL! > > of late usually dominated with a guttersnipe dialect.. > > > > > > and using billingsgate. > > > > > > yet my calling YOU a little twerp asshole is a really BIG DEAL! > > > > > > YOU pretend to have lost self and ego.. > > > > (twerp ac): > > > When did I " pretend " that? > > > > (.b b.b.) > > read the " Google " skit quoting you that Pete posted for one. > > the list goes on but you seem to forget what you've said. > > all the time. > > you're a lost lunatic son. > > :-) > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > If you translate " getting enlightened " means having permanently lost 'ego', that is your problem or... maybe, your dishonesty, again! > > > > > (.b b.b.) > > ac.. > > there is no such thing as enlightenment. > > what you're calling " getting enlightened " is a farce. > > if and when Realization or Enlightenment IS.. > > no longer is there a personality..ego..self.. > > ESPECIALLY not a twerp-like one like your own. > > how enlightening is the attempt to ban " others " ??? > > if you're so friggin' enlightened.. > > where do these " others " fit into the grand non-dualistic theme? > > it's NOT a theme with you kiddo it's a patently absurd scheme.. > > residing in your ridiculous childish dream. > > watch cartoons kiddo.. > > you'll get more out of it then your own bullshit will ever provide. > > > > > > > yet YOU brood for days in self indulgent and repugnant self pity.... > > > > > > over the slightest WORD offense about YOUR egotistical self. > > > > > > YOU are hysterically violent and resentful.. > > > > > > and conceited and childish. > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > > Unnecessary adjectives... > > > > I explained many times that I am mainly objecting to a behavior which I find disruptive and not just reacting to a personal insult. > > > > twerp is not an adjective. > > oh you must mean: > > resentful..hysterical..childish.. > > well no those aren't unnecessary at all. > > they are descriptive and you don't like the truth of them. > > that's because you are a conceited (for no good reason) twit. > > NOW listen here.. > > focus...focus. > > no more hocus-pocus.. > > you must NEVER meditate if you find such small banter " disruptive " . > > again with the " personal " insult? > > so you're a self involved enlightened being huh? > > uh huh. > > LOL! > > YOU suck up to a moderator in the most obvious of ways.. > > > > > > > (twerp ac): > > > I think I have been more 'direct', confrontational, critical, accusatory towards the moderator than most posters I have read here. Just re-read the very message you replied to. Here it is: > > > > > > > Dear Hur ji: > > > > > > > > In this case, the " confusion " (, if any,) might have been started by you :-) I think you started by posting a message and starting a poll titled " what to do with Bob " and describing how you have removed him, you moderated him and how moderating him consumed lot of time. And, then, you continued this " confusion " with the conflicting messages on the lines of " Bob is not necessary " to " Bob is important " . At least, this is how I interpreted you :-) > > ... > > > > > > Contrast that with " how " you talk to the moderator versus how you talk to other 'non authority' members. > > > oh that cutsie little " :-) " ! > > so offensive! > > yeah right. > > and why didn't you finish quoting the TOTALITY of that post ac? > > because again you are being selective to cover you're putrid ass. > The message is already in its totality at the top of the very message, you replied, Bob ji! > and why not post the other suck up posts to Hur that you've laid out.. > > throughout the past few days? Feel free to post/quote them, if you find them helpful in some way. [...] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > we sound like a big family fighting over dinner table...instead of saying pass the salt, something freudian comes up, " you ruined my perfect spiritual experience you sob! " > > > > > > > I think it is up to you, Hur Ji! > > > > Remove bob Ji! Keep Bob Ji! Ultimately, as an owner and moderator, it is your responsibility and duty. > > > > I think you asked for opinion and I expressed mine. I do think he makes this dysfunctional by needlessly replying to almost every post (, especially when you are not active) and by needlessly insulting almost every member who questions him. > > > > I think I should leave this heated " family discussion " now! Frankly speaking, whenever I enter this kind of " heated discussions " , I start thinking of my personal safety too. I know many people take whatever happens on the list, quite " personally " ! 'Angrier' and more 'aggressive' a personality type, more I suspect that to be the case. > > > > With best wishes, > > ac > > > > thanks for the laughs ac! > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > p.s. > > ac... > > a question.. > > who exactly do you think is acting angry here? I think Bob Ji comes across as being angry. However, if I am coming across as being angry then I suspect that there is a significant gap between how I feel and what I write. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > [...] > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > > > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) > > > > > > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > > > it's not problematic at all twerp. > > > > that's when the fun begins! > > > An eloquent poster wrote once: > > > When you fight with a pig, both of you will get dirty; however, pig is the only one who will enjoy it! > > > [NNB] so now you think you're above pigs... as well as all other living things. well just so's you know kiddo.. you are nothing more than a filthy animal like all us others. you're no friggin' flyin' angelic being dumbo. LOL! what a prissy twerp you are! LOL! ..b b.b. > > i'm sure you're enjoying it too. > > > > if not..too bad. > > > > i am. > > > > :-) > > > > [...] > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > now remember my paranoid little friend.. > > > > > > > > please don't put my real address and phone number all over the net. > > > > > > > > please don't threaten to beat my head with a lead pipe. > > > > > > > > please don't threaten to go to the police over this BIG STUFF! > > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > > > Yes, Bob ji! That will be " bad " result of this 'conflict'! And, that is why I think it is a duty of moderator to be vigilant. > > > > > > > > (.b b.b.) > > > > ROFLMAO! > > > > you can't be serious. > > > > go ahead. > > > > i double dog dare you ac. > > > > do your down and dirty best to do that " bad stuff " . (ac the twerp) : > I am concerned about your mental stability, Bob Ji! You comes across as a lunatic type to me and that is the cause of my concern. (.b b.b.): whenever a little paranoid nutzoid like you.. sees me as coming across as a lunatic.. and gets " concerned " (OMG! haha).. and hopefully learns to keep his distance.. i KNOW that all is right with the world. my job is done. :-) (ac the twerp) : > Feel safe from my side. I have intention and no reason to do anything " bad " to you or anyone else here. (.b b.b.) oh grow the fuck up kid. i've been making a joke of you and your paranoid behavior. you can't " do " anything to me. and it's your ridiculous belief.. that it's me " doing " ANYTHING to you that's such a goddamn joke. YOU do YOURSELF punk. i'm just standing her laughing.. watching your wheels go round and round. ROFLMAO! you poor baby! (ac the twerp): > I hope you are not too attached to this forum. And, I hope that my recommendation that you be removed in order to maintain the sanity on this forum, doesn't cause you any pain, anguish or anger. (.b b.b.) : let me jump to the below: hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaa! you've GOT to be kidding! you better start getting attched to that form kid. you ARE that form you little asshole. i know it's disappointing and all.. but that belief in a ghost in the machine.. that goes jumping through the cosmos haunting form after form.. is even more ridiculous than your already sorry ass sad sack self. get with real life twerp. sanity is available once you stop believing in ghosts. but if you ever do stop believing in your petty bullshit.. let me know ahead of time that.. you may soon be getting to that point.. baba will have to start looking for another joke to laugh at. good luck on your quest! this should be funnier than all the previous crap you've tried. LOL! > > hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! > > > > you need a couple of tranquilizers son. > > > > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > > > Ordinary members like you and me have no 'authority' and in trying to " fix " each other, we can create endless avoidable conflicts. And, if one of them is a 'maniac' kind (, which is many times not known until it happens), many disastrous results can occur! That's why I think moderator needs to decide and 'step in' whenever needed. > > > > > > > > (.b b.b.) : > > > > maybe i was wrong above.. > > > > maybe you need to break those pills in two next time kiddo. > > > > you're stepping on the threshold of deranged here. > > > > but gosh dang it all it's funny to watch. > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > (twerp ac) : > > > > > As long as it is only one entity who is abusive, aggressive, predatory... it might 'seem ok'. However, the moment others join and start returning " favors " , it can become far more pronounced and problematic :-) > > > > [...] (.b b.b.) ....there you go cutting off the rest and the best again. you really are a frightened little punk. well anyway it's been fun once again ac. NEVER is it problematic. as i said once before.. your sorry ass posts make my day! LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
