Guest guest Report post Posted January 26, 2010 > > > you're doing it wernie because you want to find a friend in group. > > you know nobody likes you nor wants you around. > > it's a desperate attempt to ignore your called for vote results. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. P: We all like and want Werner here, but guess who wants Werner here most? Yes, you know it, Bob. It's you. You are hot for Werner. You are passionate about the guy. It's a negative passion, but passion, nonetheless. Guy, are you gay? I read your disclaimer, but the way you can't leave Werner alone, and how you comment on his nose, may me wonder if you are not dreaming with Werner's big nose going up your ass. Hahahaha! What a strange dude you are! > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > You surely already have observed when you have an insight you instantly translate it verbally, you put it into words. > > An insight happens without words. It doesn't need words. It is a result of the brain's subconscious intelligence, a result of an unconscious innner work which constantly goes on and which is done without using any words. > > But why do we constantly and instantly translate any inisght into words as soon as it became conscious ? > > To recapitulate: > > Insights are already conscious, why then this additional verbal translation ? > > Imagine you no longer would translate any insight into words - what then would happen ? > > Werner Just this: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 26, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > I imagined I no longer translated insights into words > and there was silence > > And I could not tell you > > -Lene > > I don't understand this translating insights thing. I translate insights if there is the drive to communicate it to another who thinks he is a fragment. Then there is a kind of orbiting movement around one-ness - which includes the words spoken/written, for words are not other then this one-ness. The words are never a substitute of one-ness by themselves, but part of it, non separate from the non-fragmented movement. > If the intention to communicate is not there, translating it into words is the ending of the insight and the resuming of the old as the thought of separation. > -ego- well-said communication doesn't require an assumption of separated existences, of psychological distance between. - d - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 26, 2010 - cerosoul Nisargadatta Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:09 PM Re: Tanslating Insights > > > you're doing it wernie because you want to find a friend in group. > > you know nobody likes you nor wants you around. > > it's a desperate attempt to ignore your called for vote results. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. P: We all like and want Werner here, but guess who wants Werner here most? Yes, you know it, Bob. It's you. You are hot for Werner. You are passionate about the guy. It's a negative passion, but passion, nonetheless. Guy, are you gay? I read your disclaimer, but the way you can't leave Werner alone, and how you comment on his nose, may me wonder if you are not dreaming with Werner's big nose going up your ass. Hahahaha! What a strange dude you are! geo> This is the essence of an insight put into words! LOL LOL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > > > > > you're doing it wernie because you want to find a friend in group. > > > > you know nobody likes you nor wants you around. > > > > it's a desperate attempt to ignore your called for vote results. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > P: We all like and want Werner here, > but guess who wants Werner here most? Yes, > you know it, Bob. It's you. You are hot for > Werner. You are passionate about the guy. It's > a negative passion, but passion, nonetheless. > Guy, are you gay? I read your disclaimer, but > the way you can't leave Werner alone, and how you > comment on his nose, may me wonder if you are not > dreaming with Werner's big nose going up your ass. > > Hahahaha! What a strange dude you are! well Petie.. true 'nough i enjoy wernie the worm. i've even said so. care for the most recent post re that very subject? now as for the gay play.. methinks you put too much emphasis on a gag Petie. you seem to focus in on... what most probably is your own unsure sexual identity... projected outwards. why gracious laddie you even make issue.. with a comment on wernerina's big nose as seen in her profile! turns you on doesn't it Petie? please asshole..don't try to project your own sick dreams onto me. your wondering is your wondering about your own situation sport. don't deny nor externalize what you are so confused about. kiss wernie and have done with it. ROFLMAO! i love both of you. how could a God do otherwise? :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > You surely already have observed when you have an insight you instantly translate it verbally, you put it into words. > > > > An insight happens without words. It doesn't need words. It is a result of the brain's subconscious intelligence, a result of an unconscious innner work which constantly goes on and which is done without using any words. > > > > But why do we constantly and instantly translate any inisght into words as soon as it became conscious ? > > > > To recapitulate: > > > > Insights are already conscious, why then this additional verbal translation ? > > > > Imagine you no longer would translate any insight into words - what then would happen ? > > > > Werner > > Just this: ah so. soundless bullshit! Moo Goo Guy Pan! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > I imagined I no longer translated insights into words > > and there was silence > > > > And I could not tell you > > > > -Lene > > > > I don't understand this translating insights thing. I translate insights if there is the drive to communicate it to another who thinks he is a fragment. Then there is a kind of orbiting movement around one-ness - which includes the words spoken/written, for words are not other then this one-ness. The words are never a substitute of one-ness by themselves, but part of it, non separate from the non-fragmented movement. > > If the intention to communicate is not there, translating it into words is the ending of the insight and the resuming of the old as the thought of separation. > > -ego- > > well-said > > communication doesn't require an assumption of separated existences, of psychological distance between. > > - d - bullshit. you don't know that. that's just your insipid opinion. and by any standards imaginable it's stupid. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > cerosoul > Nisargadatta > Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:09 PM > Re: Tanslating Insights > > > > > > > > > > you're doing it wernie because you want to find a friend in group. > > > > you know nobody likes you nor wants you around. > > > > it's a desperate attempt to ignore your called for vote results. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > P: We all like and want Werner here, > but guess who wants Werner here most? Yes, > you know it, Bob. It's you. You are hot for > Werner. You are passionate about the guy. It's > a negative passion, but passion, nonetheless. > Guy, are you gay? I read your disclaimer, but > the way you can't leave Werner alone, and how you > comment on his nose, may me wonder if you are not > dreaming with Werner's big nose going up your ass. > > Hahahaha! What a strange dude you are! > > geo> This is the essence of an insight put into words! LOL LOL and that is the essence of ignorance boasting foolishly. ROFLMAO! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 We translate our (spiritual) insights into the words for the same reason that we put other things into words....................... " to build memories " . We make memory for a very simple reason.... to be able to use it in the future for our protection, growth or entertainment. The Great Progress that the Humanity has made during last few thousand years has been primarily due to only one Reason.......... Preserved Memories! And, memories has been primarily preserved because of our ability to translate KNOWLEDGE (things, experiences, insights, " know how " , process, data) into... Words! Contrary to the " teachings " of few moronic (in the moment), yet arrogant (always) " spiritual " teachers, humans evolution into language-aware specie hasn't all been a waste or a move backward! In fact, this is what has made the great progress possible and has given human (brain) ample time to do other things... like have " spiritual insights " ! Absent that (recorded knowledge) humans might have still been just busy just surviving! Many spiritual seekers apply same idiocy to spiritual teachings that many science students apply to science studies. When a teacher like JK says " think new " ... in place of " thinking " " new " they just start repeating... " JK said think new! " When a teacher like JK says to " not follow anyone! " they start following the one who said 'Don't follow anyone!' When a teacher like JK asks to 'question EVERYTHING' they forget to question the Very Teacher who wants them to question 'everything'! Do you " translate " your every orgasm into... words? I don't. Do you " translate " an orgasm into words, if it is unusual, unique, and extra-ordinary or if it is something you would LOVE to able to 'repeat'? I do. When thinking about a problem or situation... you suddenly get an insight, do you then try to translate (and record) it into words... especially if you think it can help solve the problem? I do. What happens when you fail to record such insights into word? I sometimes forget them and sometimes, I have to undergo thee same process and same delay again, sometimes still failing to get the same insight again! .... Words like match boxes are friends. Of course, one can use match box to put a house on fire... and, that is not necessarily the fault of the match box! [NNB] Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > You surely already have observed when you have an insight you instantly translate it verbally, you put it into words. > > An insight happens without words. It doesn't need words. It is a result of the brain's subconscious intelligence, a result of an unconscious innner work which constantly goes on and which is done without using any words. > > But why do we constantly and instantly translate any inisght into words as soon as it became conscious ? > > To recapitulate: > > Insights are already conscious, why then this additional verbal translation ? > > Imagine you no longer would translate any insight into words - what then would happen ? > > Werner > > > you mean like the cow Lakshmi....the enlightened cow of Ramana?... > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > We translate our (spiritual) insights into the words for the same reason that we put other things into words....................... " to build memories " . > In fact, next time you think you don't know why you do something, ask yourself if it has something to do with 'Memories'! BTW... 'how' do you think memories are made... when you are nor ;recording' them using pen and paper (or, computer)? What you MUST do in order to make memories? > We make memory for a very simple reason.... to be able to use it in the future for our protection, growth or entertainment. > > > The Great Progress that the Humanity has made during last few thousand years has been primarily due to only one Reason.......... Preserved Memories! > > > And, memories has been primarily preserved because of our ability to translate KNOWLEDGE (things, experiences, insights, " know how " , process, data) into... Words! > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 ac you are hung up on orgasms. likely you are hung up on onanism as well. too much information you sleazeball dirt ball. get a life and keep that stuff to yourself. have you been striking out lately? Jesus! ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > We translate our (spiritual) insights into the words for the same reason that we put other things into words....................... " to build memories " . > > We make memory for a very simple reason.... to be able to use it in the future for our protection, growth or entertainment. > > > The Great Progress that the Humanity has made during last few thousand years has been primarily due to only one Reason.......... Preserved Memories! > > > And, memories has been primarily preserved because of our ability to translate KNOWLEDGE (things, experiences, insights, " know how " , process, data) into... Words! > > > > Contrary to the " teachings " of few moronic (in the moment), yet arrogant (always) " spiritual " teachers, humans evolution into language-aware specie hasn't all been a waste or a move backward! In fact, this is what has made the great progress possible and has given human (brain) ample time to do other things... like have " spiritual insights " ! Absent that (recorded knowledge) humans might have still been just busy just surviving! > > > Many spiritual seekers apply same idiocy to spiritual teachings that many science students apply to science studies. When a teacher like JK says " think new " ... in place of " thinking " " new " they just start repeating... " JK said think new! " When a teacher like JK says to " not follow anyone! " they start following the one who said 'Don't follow anyone!' When a teacher like JK asks to 'question EVERYTHING' they forget to question the Very Teacher who wants them to question 'everything'! > > > Do you " translate " your every orgasm into... words? > > I don't. > > > Do you " translate " an orgasm into words, if it is unusual, unique, and extra-ordinary or if it is something you would LOVE to able to 'repeat'? > > I do. > > > When thinking about a problem or situation... you suddenly get an insight, do you then try to translate (and record) it into words... especially if you think it can help solve the problem? > > I do. > > > What happens when you fail to record such insights into word? > > I sometimes forget them and sometimes, I have to undergo thee same process and same delay again, sometimes still failing to get the same insight again! > > > ... > > Words like match boxes are friends. Of course, one can use match box to put a house on fire... and, that is not necessarily the fault of the match box! > > > > > [NNB] Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > You surely already have observed when you have an insight you instantly translate it verbally, you put it into words. > > > > An insight happens without words. It doesn't need words. It is a result of the brain's subconscious intelligence, a result of an unconscious innner work which constantly goes on and which is done without using any words. > > > > But why do we constantly and instantly translate any inisght into words as soon as it became conscious ? > > > > To recapitulate: > > > > Insights are already conscious, why then this additional verbal translation ? > > > > Imagine you no longer would translate any insight into words - what then would happen ? > > > > Werner > > > > > > you mean like the cow Lakshmi....the enlightened cow of Ramana?... > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. " you " ARE memories. holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. at least that's slightly less ridiculous. ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > We translate our (spiritual) insights into the words for the same reason that we put other things into words....................... " to build memories " . > > > > > In fact, next time you think you don't know why you do something, ask yourself if it has something to do with 'Memories'! > > > BTW... 'how' do you think memories are made... when you are nor ;recording' them using pen and paper (or, computer)? > > What you MUST do in order to make memories? > > > > We make memory for a very simple reason.... to be able to use it in the future for our protection, growth or entertainment. > > > > > > The Great Progress that the Humanity has made during last few thousand years has been primarily due to only one Reason.......... Preserved Memories! > > > > > > And, memories has been primarily preserved because of our ability to translate KNOWLEDGE (things, experiences, insights, " know how " , process, data) into... Words! > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > I imagined I no longer translated insights into words > > > and there was silence > > > > > > And I could not tell you > > > > > > -Lene > > > > > > I don't understand this translating insights thing. I translate insights if there is the drive to communicate it to another who thinks he is a fragment. Then there is a kind of orbiting movement around one-ness - which includes the words spoken/written, for words are not other then this one-ness. The words are never a substitute of one-ness by themselves, but part of it, non separate from the non-fragmented movement. > > > If the intention to communicate is not there, translating it into words is the ending of the insight and the resuming of the old as the thought of separation. > > > -ego- > > > > well-said > > > > communication doesn't require an assumption of separated existences, of psychological distance between. > > > > - d - > > > bullshit. > > you don't know that. > > that's just your insipid opinion. > > and by any standards imaginable it's stupid. > > .b b.b. I just sent a response to your previous post and now read this. What you write here fits exactly the pattern I described, as do the great majority of bobby's posts. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I imagined I no longer translated insights into words > > > > and there was silence > > > > > > > > And I could not tell you > > > > > > > > -Lene > > > > > > > > I don't understand this translating insights thing. I translate insights if there is the drive to communicate it to another who thinks he is a fragment. Then there is a kind of orbiting movement around one-ness - which includes the words spoken/written, for words are not other then this one-ness. The words are never a substitute of one-ness by themselves, but part of it, non separate from the non-fragmented movement. > > > > If the intention to communicate is not there, translating it into words is the ending of the insight and the resuming of the old as the thought of separation. > > > > -ego- > > > > > > well-said > > > > > > communication doesn't require an assumption of separated existences, of psychological distance between. > > > > > > - d - > > > > > > bullshit. > > > > you don't know that. > > > > that's just your insipid opinion. > > > > and by any standards imaginable it's stupid. > > > > .b b.b. > > I just sent a response to your previous post and now read this. > > What you write here fits exactly the pattern I described, as do the great majority of bobby's posts. > > - D - i knew you'd say that. that's why i said what i did. you're a doorknob. no key needed to turn your handle. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is not the premise, Lene. > > > > > > > > > > Surely you could tell it but you don't dare to face the answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the answer? > > > > > > > > You said: imagine! > > > > > > > > I imagined I no longer translated insights into words > > > > and there was silence > > > > > > > > And I could not tell you > > > > > > > > -Lene > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lene, > > > > > > Watch it, you are alone in a forest, no one is with you, totally alone. > > > > > > And yet you constantly and instantly are translating any insight into words, no one around you could tell it to. > > > > > > If you stopped that strange behavior there won't be silence. All the sounds of the forest will be still there. You can hear your breath, feel your body, smell what the air is carrying to you. > > > > > > The only which you stopped is translating anything you see, hear, feel, smell into words. > > > > > > Why the hell are we doing that, even when we are totally alone ? > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > P: This is a very important topic, Werner, thanks for asking. > > I guess, Leni won't like my brainy answer, but if you want > to understand 'no self' you have to see how different parts > of the brain draw a self, just as different Disney's artists > contribute to make a cartoon. > > > > To give a correct answer to your question, we have to > see there is no " self " living in the brain. There are > just different brain centers communicating with each other. > > The main communicator and translator in chief is the speech > center. It's important to see that there is a constant > conversation going on in the brain among different brain > centers, and that insights often get translated into > images, sounds, sensations, and feelings, but it's only > when translated into words that they become available to > the reasoning center, and get incorporated into the self- > model called Werner. The self model represents the urge > to posses and to hoard. So, we can only imagine that > translation could cease. It's not going to happen, at least, > not for long. Sooner or later all insights get translated > and corrupted by words. The ones that don't, fade into the subconscious. Nice. Not too brainy. Makes sense. No " self " - only different brain centers communicating with each other. Sounds right. Is this the case as well when I speak with you? One center communicating with another center? Well, there is a center here answering: yes, it is. And when there is " inner " conversation taking place it is more than clear that it is correct what you wrote. " Why don't you go ice-skating? " " Nah, it is dangerous and what about cleaning the flat, I thought that was what we were going to do today? " " Yes, okay, but you never know when the ice will be gone and besides you need to find out how to manage on your own on the ice with de boots in de rucksack, and noone to talk to, just there all on your own, and what if you fall and break something? You must find out so move it now. Chop chop! " " Okay, you win again, you little playing games and having fun:) Let's go ice-dancing! " And we did, and the weather was exorbitantly beautiful, and we fell twice for we are not professional no and we are not going iceskating again just yet, too risky, we nearly broke a rib But we did it, and that is what life is about - daring to live forgetting all about " death " because we do not know what it is and besides the accidents yesterday happened suddenly!! though expectedly, right out of the blue --- and daring to change the subject whenever feeling like it So to be alone is this: to be all the voices of the world, and the listening to them. There are of course no rules - there is only what happens, and the voices may call it what they like. Love -Line Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > " you " ARE memories. Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? [NNB] > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > .b b.b. > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 you WANT to be treated like a child? well for Christ sakes you should have said so. OK.. kitchy kitchy coo cuckoo. LOL! ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > > > " you " ARE memories. > > > > Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? > > > Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > you WANT to be treated like a child? Dear Bob: A 7 year old kid makes memories (remembers things) pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. What is that way? A 7 year old kid walks pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. [NNB] > > well for Christ sakes you should have said so. > > OK.. > > kitchy kitchy coo cuckoo. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > > > > > " you " ARE memories. > > > > > > > > Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? > > > > > > Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? > > > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > > > > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 your point being? what does any of what your saying have to do with what i said? ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > you WANT to be treated like a child? > > > Dear Bob: > > A 7 year old kid makes memories (remembers things) pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > What is that way? > > > A 7 year old kid walks pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > [NNB] > > > > > > well for Christ sakes you should have said so. > > > > OK.. > > > > kitchy kitchy coo cuckoo. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > > > > > > > " you " ARE memories. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? > > > > > > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > > > > > > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 27, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > your point being? > > what does any of what your saying have to do with what i said? > > .b b.b. I asked: How do you think we make memories? If that is not clear to you, I am asking: How do you think 7 year old kids make memories (remember things)? I am suggesting that most adults make memories same way that most kids do. If that too is not clear to you: How does a kid learn to associate 'sound of A' with the 'symbol of A'? How does a kid learn to associate 'sound of the word Aplle', 'the writing of the word apple' with the fruit apple? Do you want to try to give an honest answer? [NNB] > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > you WANT to be treated like a child? > > > > > > Dear Bob: > > > > A 7 year old kid makes memories (remembers things) pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > > > What is that way? > > > > > > A 7 year old kid walks pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > well for Christ sakes you should have said so. > > > > > > OK.. > > > > > > kitchy kitchy coo cuckoo. > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > > > > > > > > > " you " ARE memories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? > > > > > > > > > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > > > > > > > > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 28, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > your point being? > > > > what does any of what your saying have to do with what i said? > > > > .b b.b. > > > I asked: > > How do you think we make memories? > > > If that is not clear to you, > > I am asking: > > How do you think 7 year old kids make memories (remember things)? > > I am suggesting that most adults make memories same way that most kids do. > > > If that too is not clear to you: > > > How does a kid learn to associate 'sound of A' with the 'symbol of A'? > > > How does a kid learn to associate 'sound of the word Aplle', 'the writing of the word apple' with the fruit apple? > > > > Do you want to try to give an honest answer? okey dokey. you WANT to be treated like a child? ..b b.b. > [NNB] > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > you WANT to be treated like a child? > > > > > > > > > Dear Bob: > > > > > > A 7 year old kid makes memories (remembers things) pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > > > > > What is that way? > > > > > > > > > A 7 year old kid walks pretty much same way that a 37 year old adult does. > > > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well for Christ sakes you should have said so. > > > > > > > > OK.. > > > > > > > > kitchy kitchy coo cuckoo. > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > " you " don't " make " memories dipstick. > > > > > > > > > > > > " you " ARE memories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " kids in your town prepare for exams? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that " how " teachers in your town recommend kids to prepare for exam? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [NNB] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > holy shit go back to your Hindu Voodoo. > > > > > > > > > > > > at least that's slightly less ridiculous. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 28, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >B: well Petie.. > > > > > > > > > now as for the gay play.. > > > > > > methinks you put too much emphasis on a gag Petie. > > > > > > you seem to focus in on... > > > > > > what most probably is your own unsure sexual identity... > > > > > > projected outwards. > > > > > > why gracious laddie you even make issue.. > > > > > > with a comment on wernerina's big nose as seen in her profile! > > > > > > turns you on doesn't it Petie? > > > > > > please asshole..don't try to project your own sick dreams onto me. > > > > > > your wondering is your wondering about your own situation sport. > > > > > > don't deny nor externalize what you are so confused about. > > > > > > kiss wernie and have done with it. > > > > > > ROFLMAO! > > > > > > i love both of you. > > > > > > how could a God do otherwise? > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > P: Well, Bob, let's review who initiated this > > and how, and maybe show people Bob's hidden face. > > > > It was you who first mentioned that you are not gay > > in message # 82614: > > > > > > (.b b.b): > > Oh let's Petsie.. > > let's see all the precious work you've gone too! > > so here we go! > > oh boy! > B: " I feel pretty > > > > Oh so pretty > > > > I feel pretty and witty and gay > > > > (oh nay but it's in the song so what the hay) > > > > > > > > Feel like running > > > > And dancing for joy > > > > For I'm loved > > > > By a pretty wonderful boy (now wait one goddamn minute here!) > > > > ok but you get the idea. " > > > > P: Ok, once, it's a joke, and I thought it was funny. > > > > (.b b.b.): > > oh i'm just overjoyed! > > your opinion means soooo musch to me P. > > LOL! > > > > > > But then, on Msg # 82647 you denied it again to Leni: > > > > >L: pearls on a string > > > > > > you are pretty > > > > > > and funny > > > > > > and gay > > > > > > -lei > > > > > > :-) > > > > B: " well if we must use words ala wernie the wonder wormie.. > > > > can we spell that last bit " gei " . > > > > i don't know but i just feel more comfortable with it that way. > > > > mindlessly of course. " > > > > .b b.b. > > > > P: Hmm! Twice in a day? What is this with Bob > > and saying he is not comfortable with the word gay? > > Maybe Bob needs help coming out of the closet, > > so I asked you, " Guy, are you gay? " And for the > > third time you denied it. Hey! I don't care if you > > are Bob, or Roberta. Either way, it's plain as > > day, that you are the same sadistic, fun loving bitch. > > > > > (.b b.b.) > > you have too much time on your hands Peter. > > and maybe you think about peters too much. > > i don't know which it is....but dude! > > have you ever gone to a Comedy Central Club.. > > or watched any cutting edge Reality TV.. > > or even gotten out beyond the confines of these lists? > > you're beginning to analyze fun and games waaaay too much pete. > > i personally don't care one way or t'other who's what. > > but i do know what's what with me. > > and you're out of your tree. > > not that there's anything wrong with that or being gay either. > > but most of the time jokes are just jokes Pete. > > analyze that. > > > > > > > The interesting part is, why are you defending > > your male image? It shows that there is a button > > there to push . That you would hate being called > > Roberta. Are you a phoney, Bob? Is all your talk > > of not caring, not existing, all being a huge Blank > > just a phoney pretext to get your jollies insulting > > other posters? Please explain, and remember, no excuses, > > as detective Friday used to say: > > " Just the facts, Mam! hahaha! > > > > (.b b.b.): > > > LOL! > > yep Pete i'm a phony...or as you have it a " phoney " .. > > what is that anyway someone who's on the phone too much? > > well anyway yeppers i'm a phony. > > and i guess all the fine folks like yourself here are not. > > gee i never even considered myself a saint and such. > > and i didn't know saints looked for " buttons " . > > push'em Pete. > > it's funny watching you waste more of your valueless time. > > somehow i enjoy being a phony. > > like i'm loving saying all this phony shit right now. > > i'm looking down over myself right now also and dang it all.. > > i can't see one button. > > oh hell.. > > i've got a tee shirt and gym pants on. > > well there you go. > > sorry Petie. > > are you in your button up shoes? > > :-) > > .b b.b. Me phony too Takes one To know One Must say every time said I was not gay Was wondering why I so say Perhaps I am gay Or just pretty and witty and happy Like ten million wild horses Dancing in the plai N And then - who the hell cares Struck me that when you say For me to spell gei That just might Be short for Gei Sha Ha Ha Djei cordless white p(h)ony Yours vertically Linear Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
