Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > mn. > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the complain? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > mn. > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the > complain? One can't observe someone else's " need " ... only one's number of postings. Nothing is really known about it. Could be this is a computer automatically generating messages and dumping them onto the list. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > mn. > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > Tim, did he complain or did he point at the fact that 3000 postings of 70.000 tells a lot ? But I think one can forgive you because such a brownnoser like you has lost any sensitivity to discriminate. Werner Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Tim, did he complain or did he point at the fact that 3000 postings > of 70.000 tells a lot ? It doesn't tell anything, Werner. It's all an assumption. > But I think one can forgive you because such a brownnoser like you > has lost any sensitivity to discriminate. Why post insults, if one wants responses? I know that usually attracts folks, but some just find it to be nonsense, the obvious presence of a 'self' wanting to make itself look better than the rest. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > > mn. > > > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > > > > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the > > complain? > > One can't observe someone else's " need " ... only one's number of postings. > > Nothing is really known about it. Could be this is a computer automatically generating messages and dumping them onto the list. > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice for communication. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, with due respect. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > >> Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, > with due respect. Well then, mstrdmmlbrn can be one of the first ;-). Why be the way " everyone else " is? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > Do you have children, Tim ? I don't think so, else you couldn't post such nonsens of 'remaining cool, clear and unattached'. What an emotional coward you are, Tim. Werner Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > > > > > Do you have children, Tim ? I don't think so, else you couldn't post such nonsens of 'remaining cool, clear and unattached'. > > What an emotional coward you are, Tim. > > Werner Yet more insults. After a question that was already asked ;-). The coward is the one who is afraid of letting go of attachment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > >> Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, > with due respect. > > Well then, mstrdmmlbrn can be one of the first ;-). Why be the way " everyone else " is? > It camouflages the fear in 'everyone else', I guess. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this > > medium. > > " Self " is " other " (something that can be perceived) and " other " is " other " (something that can be perceived). > > " What can be perceived " (body, thoughts, personal history) cannot be oneself.... as, in order to be perceived, it must be an object. > > As there is nothing but the body, thoughts and personal history, there is no self. > > Nobody broadcasts via this medium. Whatever is written, is interpreted by the reader... and totally differently depending on whatever imagined 'self' is reading it. > > All is filtered through the web of memory. > > In point of fact, there is only the reader. well that's your interpretation. there are no such things as " facts " ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > >> Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, > with due respect. > > > > Well then, mstrdmmlbrn can be one of the first ;-). Why be the way " everyone else " is? > > > > It camouflages the fear in 'everyone else', I guess. If one looks very closely, one will see that others neither see us, nor do we see them. We see 'ourselves' in others, and others see 'themselves' in us. There is only " ego seeing ego " . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > mn. > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? ~sky (aka robert amory).. (aka his coward handle: mstrdmmlbrn).. complains about not getting free stuff that he begs for. beginning and ending of story re our little worm here skyzie. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > mn. > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the complain? " so what's the complain? " .. YOU..you asshole. you still don't get it? what a dumb fuck! LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > > mn. > > > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > > > > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the > > complain? > > One can't observe someone else's " need " ... only one's number of postings. > > Nothing is really known about it. Could be this is a computer automatically generating messages and dumping them onto the list. a very intelligent computer too! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > mn. > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > > Tim, did he complain or did he point at the fact that 3000 postings of 70.000 tells a lot ? > > But I think one can forgive you because such a brownnoser like you has lost any sensitivity to discriminate. > > Werner wernie: Kuemmern sie sich um ihre Angelegenheiten. Wenn ich deine Hackfresse hätte würd'.. ich lachend in ne' Kreissäge laufen. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Tim, did he complain or did he point at the fact that 3000 postings > > of 70.000 tells a lot ? > > It doesn't tell anything, Werner. It's all an assumption. > > > But I think one can forgive you because such a brownnoser like you > > has lost any sensitivity to discriminate. > > Why post insults, if one wants responses? I know that usually attracts folks, but some just find it to be nonsense, the obvious presence of a 'self' wanting to make itself look better than the rest. your self is trying hard to be the best of all huh? ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon Lttl mn you should know by now that; " those who know do not > > > > > > > > > speak; those who speak do not know " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The belief that 'someone else' is speaking, is silly. Words are interpreted by the reader, not " broadcast " by the writer in some fixed form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, that must explain the need to 'broadcast' via this medium. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're interpreting what he said. > > > > > > > > > > > > you are the needy asshole. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > Over 3000 messages out of 70.000 tells a lot about your need Lttl > > > > > mn. > > > > > > > > Some folks like posting a lot, some like posting a little. Why complain? What's there to complain about? > > > > > > > > > > Its not a complain, but rather an observation, so what's the > > > complain? > > > > One can't observe someone else's " need " ... only one's number of postings. > > > > Nothing is really known about it. Could be this is a computer automatically generating messages and dumping them onto the list. > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice for communication. who would ever want to communicate with a loser like you? :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. that doesn't move me. i'm rather unattached to that kind of syrupy bullshit. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > > > Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, with due respect. there's that smarmy little asshole. with no respect. which " no respect " is your due. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > >> Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, > with due respect. > > Well then, mstrdmmlbrn can be one of the first ;-). Why be the way " everyone else " is? oh he isn't like ANYONE else i assure you. sky creep stands alone in his begging bullshit. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > > > > > Do you have children, Tim ? I don't think so, else you couldn't post such nonsens of 'remaining cool, clear and unattached'. > > What an emotional coward you are, Tim. > > Werner and you wernie-poo are an emotional wreck. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The ability to empathize oneself with another person is a basic > > > > capacity to recognize emotions and is innate to most humans, so nice > for communication. > > > > > > Feeling the emotions oneself is not required for empathy. If anything, empathy is much more 'effective' when one remains cool and clear, unattached. > > > > > > > > > Do you have children, Tim ? I don't think so, else you couldn't post such nonsens of 'remaining cool, clear and unattached'. > > > > What an emotional coward you are, Tim. > > > > Werner > > Yet more insults. After a question that was already asked ;-). > > The coward is the one who is afraid of letting go of attachment. i agree. that's why i'm not attached to any of the losers here.. or any of their bullshit either. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn@> wrote: > > > > > >> Very, very few members cool, clear and unattached at this forum then, > with due respect. > > > > Well then, mstrdmmlbrn can be one of the first ;-). Why be the way " everyone else " is? > > > > It camouflages the fear in 'everyone else', I guess. no ~sky.. your cowardly fear is as clear as day. it stands out and away from the background. c'mon now sugar.. beg for forgiveness. ROFLMAO! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
