Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > NondualitySalon , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > I've heard a few on these forums comment that since there's no self, " self-enquiry " is a myth, that it doesn't work. > > This is not the case, and here's why. > > As there's no self, self-enquiry is not enquiry into oneself. > > It is turning away from " externalization " , from " exteriorizing " . > > From the constant attempts to make things be " away from oneself " , " out there " , some other time, some other place... > > Some 'other', period. > > " Other " creates, supports and generates " self " . > > Thus, one turns away from the habit of creating " elsewhere " , " elsewhen " through " turning within " . > > It is not turning to a " Self " . > > It is turning away from " other " . > > Not rejecting relationships and people, but rejecting the notion that people are *other* people. > > This is why " self-enquiry " . > > --- End forwarded message --- you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. that must be boring. even if you're not all there. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > that must be boring. Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > that must be boring. > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? nope. timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. talk about boring! but timmy's so into himself.. that he loves his boredom too. that's real loneliness kiddo. to bad about the boring company you keep... and then try to " project " on imaginary others seeing others. sad actually. but .b b.b. doesn't give a shit about what's sad. it makes him laugh. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > nope. > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > talk about boring! > > but timmy's so into himself.. timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). -tim- You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others). -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > nope. > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > talk about boring! > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > -tim- > > You did not understand what he said. I really wasn't listening, to be honest. Bob's mainly into flaming, attacking, defending, parrying, thrusting, and the thrill of the insult. What's to hear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > > > > nope. > > > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > > > talk about boring! > > > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > > -tim- > > > > You did not understand what he said. > > I really wasn't listening, to be honest. Bob's mainly into flaming, attacking, defending, parrying, thrusting, and the thrill of the insult. What's to hear? we are one. what's not to hear. you're a phony. hear that. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > we are one. > > what's not to hear. If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. Whoops! ;-). Peace, bro... > you're a phony. > > hear that. > > LOL! Love u 2 ;-). Hugs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > we are one. > > > > what's not to hear. > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > Whoops! ;-). > > Peace, bro... > > > you're a phony. > > > > hear that. > > > > LOL! > > Love u 2 ;-). > > Hugs... we are one. what's to hug? wouldn't that be self abuse? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > LOL! > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > Hugs... > > > we are one. > > what's to hug? > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > .b b.b. Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > we are one. > > > > what's to hug? > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > .b b.b. > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. oh i see.. all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . you try and suck and blow at the same time. you're going to hurt yourself trying to do that son. relax and be natural. all that fluffy horseshit.. can be shed with a shake of your shoulder. unburden yourself with that phony piety and enjoy life. it's all there.. and it's all there is and all you got or are ever going to get. sometimes you sound like werner. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > we are one. > > > > what's to hug? > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > .b b.b. > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. oh i see.. all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . -bbb- That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > oh i see.. > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > -bbb- > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > -geo- who's feeling either one? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > oh i see.. > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > -bbb- > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > -geo- who's feeling either one? ..b b.b. I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > oh i see.. > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > -bbb- > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > -geo- Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use. Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-). It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness. -tim- Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > roberibus111 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > oh i see.. > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > -bbb- > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > -geo- > > who's feeling either one? > > .b b.b. > > I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This > diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is. > -geo- Bob: The body is a biological, multi-cellular organism. There's no " who " in it. That one comes out of owls ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > oh i see.. > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > -bbb- > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > -geo- > > Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use. > > Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-). > > It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness. > -tim- > > Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains? > -geo- I didn't say there weren't different brains. I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true knowledge. It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > roberibus111 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > oh i see.. > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > -bbb- > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > -geo- > > who's feeling either one? > > .b b.b. > > I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This > diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is. > -geo- who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ? > > .b b.b. Asking " somebody else " this question is the very height of silliness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > > > oh i see.. > > > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > > -bbb- > > > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > > -geo- > > > > Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use. > > > > Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-). > > > > It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness. > > -tim- > > > > Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains? > > -geo- > > I didn't say there weren't different brains. > > I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true knowledge. It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal. what's truth? or " true knowledge " ? indeed.. what can be " false " ? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > what's truth? > > or " true knowledge " ? > > indeed.. > > what can be " false " ? The content of thought, as it refers solely to a nonexistent past and/or future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > roberibus111 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > oh i see.. > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > -bbb- > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > -geo- > > who's feeling either one? > > .b b.b. > > I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This > diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is. > -geo- who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ? ..b b.b. Yes but that doesnt mean that there is no diversity...including different bodies in consciousness. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > I didn't say there weren't different brains. > > I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true > knowledge. It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal. > -tim- > > That for brains...and why not for bodies also? > -geo- Yes, for bodies too. All this talk (words) qualifies, but we were talking specifically about brains, so that's what I mentioned, I s'pose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:30 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > what's truth? > > or " true knowledge " ? > > indeed.. > > what can be " false " ? The content of thought, as it refers solely to a nonexistent past and/or future. -tim- That is a fact, truth, as memory contents, movement of electrons in a brain. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:27 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ? > > > > .b b.b. > > Asking " somebody else " this question is the very height of silliness. > -tim- > > No tim!!! He is not asking anything - he is pointing!!! > -geo- Are ya sure? Seems here he was asking the question. Could be he was pointing, tho, I dunno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > roberibus111 > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > roberibus111 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM > > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what's not to hear. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Whoops! ;-). > > > > > > > > > > > > Peace, bro... > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're a phony. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hear that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > > > Love u 2 ;-). > > > > > > > > > > > > Hugs... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we are one. > > > > > > > > > > what's to hug? > > > > > > > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse? > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly. > > > > > > oh i see.. > > > > > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " . > > > -bbb- > > > > > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there > > > -geo- > > > > who's feeling either one? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This > > diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is. > > -geo- > > Bob: The body is a biological, multi-cellular organism. > > There's no " who " in it. That one comes out of owls ;-). and who knows that? what is an organism? the words and meanings are on a par with the grunts of pigs? if this is so.. why the fuck bother with any of it? wallow and wonder then. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.