Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> NondualitySalon , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

>

> I've heard a few on these forums comment that since there's no self,

" self-enquiry " is a myth, that it doesn't work.

>

> This is not the case, and here's why.

>

> As there's no self, self-enquiry is not enquiry into oneself.

>

> It is turning away from " externalization " , from " exteriorizing " .

>

> From the constant attempts to make things be " away from oneself " , " out there " ,

some other time, some other place...

>

> Some 'other', period.

>

> " Other " creates, supports and generates " self " .

>

> Thus, one turns away from the habit of creating " elsewhere " , " elsewhen "

through " turning within " .

>

> It is not turning to a " Self " .

>

> It is turning away from " other " .

>

> Not rejecting relationships and people, but rejecting the notion that people

are *other* people.

>

> This is why " self-enquiry " .

>

> --- End forwarded message ---

 

 

you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

 

that must be boring.

 

even if you're not all there.

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

 

Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages are full

of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " .

 

> that must be boring.

 

Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

>

> Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages are

full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " .

>

> > that must be boring.

>

> Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?

 

 

nope.

 

timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'.

 

talk about boring!

 

but timmy's so into himself..

 

that he loves his boredom too.

 

that's real loneliness kiddo.

 

to bad about the boring company you keep...

 

and then try to " project " on imaginary others seeing others.

 

sad actually.

 

but .b b.b. doesn't give a shit about what's sad.

 

it makes him laugh.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

> >

> > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages

> > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " .

> >

> > > that must be boring.

> >

> > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?

>

>

> nope.

>

> timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'.

>

> talk about boring!

>

> but timmy's so into himself..

 

timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-).

-tim-

 

You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others).

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> Tim G.

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

> > >

> > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages

> > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " .

> > >

> > > > that must be boring.

> > >

> > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?

> >

> >

> > nope.

> >

> > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'.

> >

> > talk about boring!

> >

> > but timmy's so into himself..

>

> timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-).

> -tim-

>

> You did not understand what he said.

 

I really wasn't listening, to be honest. Bob's mainly into flaming, attacking,

defending, parrying, thrusting, and the thrill of the insult. What's to hear?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > Tim G.

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself.

> > > >

> > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages

> > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " .

> > > >

> > > > > that must be boring.

> > > >

> > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?

> > >

> > >

> > > nope.

> > >

> > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'.

> > >

> > > talk about boring!

> > >

> > > but timmy's so into himself..

> >

> > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-).

> > -tim-

> >

> > You did not understand what he said.

>

> I really wasn't listening, to be honest. Bob's mainly into flaming,

attacking, defending, parrying, thrusting, and the thrill of the insult. What's

to hear?

 

 

we are one.

 

what's not to hear.

 

you're a phony.

 

hear that.

 

LOL!

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> we are one.

>

> what's not to hear.

 

If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

 

Whoops! ;-).

 

Peace, bro...

 

> you're a phony.

>

> hear that.

>

> LOL!

 

Love u 2 ;-).

 

Hugs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > we are one.

> >

> > what's not to hear.

>

> If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

>

> Whoops! ;-).

>

> Peace, bro...

>

> > you're a phony.

> >

> > hear that.

> >

> > LOL!

>

> Love u 2 ;-).

>

> Hugs...

 

 

we are one.

 

what's to hug?

 

wouldn't that be self abuse?

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > we are one.

> > >

> > > what's not to hear.

> >

> > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> >

> > Whoops! ;-).

> >

> > Peace, bro...

> >

> > > you're a phony.

> > >

> > > hear that.

> > >

> > > LOL!

> >

> > Love u 2 ;-).

> >

> > Hugs...

>

>

> we are one.

>

> what's to hug?

>

> wouldn't that be self abuse?

>

> .b b.b.

 

Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > we are one.

> > > >

> > > > what's not to hear.

> > >

> > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > >

> > > Whoops! ;-).

> > >

> > > Peace, bro...

> > >

> > > > you're a phony.

> > > >

> > > > hear that.

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > >

> > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > >

> > > Hugs...

> >

> >

> > we are one.

> >

> > what's to hug?

> >

> > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

 

 

oh i see..

 

all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

 

you try and suck and blow at the same time.

 

you're going to hurt yourself trying to do that son.

 

relax and be natural.

 

all that fluffy horseshit..

 

can be shed with a shake of your shoulder.

 

unburden yourself with that phony piety and enjoy life.

 

it's all there..

 

and it's all there is and all you got or are ever going to get.

 

sometimes you sound like werner.

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > we are one.

> > > >

> > > > what's not to hear.

> > >

> > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > >

> > > Whoops! ;-).

> > >

> > > Peace, bro...

> > >

> > > > you're a phony.

> > > >

> > > > hear that.

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > >

> > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > >

> > > Hugs...

> >

> >

> > we are one.

> >

> > what's to hug?

> >

> > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

 

oh i see..

 

all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

-bbb-

 

That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > we are one.

> > > > >

> > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > >

> > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > >

> > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Peace, bro...

> > > >

> > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > >

> > > > > hear that.

> > > > >

> > > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Hugs...

> > >

> > >

> > > we are one.

> > >

> > > what's to hug?

> > >

> > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

>

> oh i see..

>

> all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> -bbb-

>

> That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> -geo-

 

 

who's feeling either one?

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > we are one.

> > > > >

> > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > >

> > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > >

> > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Peace, bro...

> > > >

> > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > >

> > > > > hear that.

> > > > >

> > > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Hugs...

> > >

> > >

> > > we are one.

> > >

> > > what's to hug?

> > >

> > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

>

> oh i see..

>

> all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> -bbb-

>

> That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> -geo-

 

who's feeling either one?

 

..b b.b.

 

I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This

diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is.

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

>

> oh i see..

>

> all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> -bbb-

>

> That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> -geo-

 

Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use.

 

Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-).

 

It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness.

-tim-

 

Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains?

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > we are one.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > > >

> > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > > >

> > > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Peace, bro...

> > > > >

> > > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > hear that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Hugs...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > we are one.

> > > >

> > > > what's to hug?

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> >

> > oh i see..

> >

> > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > -bbb-

> >

> > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > -geo-

>

> who's feeling either one?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This

> diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is.

> -geo-

 

Bob: The body is a biological, multi-cellular organism.

 

There's no " who " in it. That one comes out of owls ;-).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> Tim G.

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> >

> > oh i see..

> >

> > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > -bbb-

> >

> > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > -geo-

>

> Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use.

>

> Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-).

>

> It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness.

> -tim-

>

> Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains?

> -geo-

 

I didn't say there weren't different brains.

 

I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true knowledge.

It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > we are one.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > > >

> > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > > >

> > > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Peace, bro...

> > > > >

> > > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > hear that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Hugs...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > we are one.

> > > >

> > > > what's to hug?

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> >

> > oh i see..

> >

> > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > -bbb-

> >

> > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > -geo-

>

> who's feeling either one?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This

> diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is.

> -geo-

 

 

who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ?

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ?

>

> .b b.b.

 

Asking " somebody else " this question is the very height of silliness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > Tim G.

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> > >

> > > oh i see..

> > >

> > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > > -bbb-

> > >

> > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > > -geo-

> >

> > Bodies, or people, or whatever word one wants to use.

> >

> > Anyone who denies there are people is silly ;-).

> >

> > It's got nothing whatsoever to do with not-two-ness.

> > -tim-

> >

> > Well, tim, then if there are different bodies whynot different brains?

> > -geo-

>

> I didn't say there weren't different brains.

>

> I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true knowledge.

It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal.

 

 

what's truth?

 

or " true knowledge " ?

 

indeed..

 

what can be " false " ?

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> what's truth?

>

> or " true knowledge " ?

>

> indeed..

>

> what can be " false " ?

 

The content of thought, as it refers solely to a nonexistent past and/or future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > > > > <Roberibus111@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > we are one.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > > >

> > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > > >

> > > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Peace, bro...

> > > > >

> > > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > hear that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > > >

> > > > > Hugs...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > we are one.

> > > >

> > > > what's to hug?

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> >

> > oh i see..

> >

> > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > -bbb-

> >

> > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > -geo-

>

> who's feeling either one?

>

> .b b.b.

>

> I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This

> diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is.

> -geo-

 

who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ?

 

..b b.b.

 

Yes but that doesnt mean that there is no diversity...including different

bodies in consciousness.

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> I didn't say there weren't different brains.

>

> I said that the notion of there being different brains is not true

> knowledge. It's a notion, a guess, a surmisal.

> -tim-

>

> That for brains...and why not for bodies also?

> -geo-

 

Yes, for bodies too. All this talk (words) qualifies, but we were talking

specifically about brains, so that's what I mentioned, I s'pose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 13, 2009 10:30 AM

Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> what's truth?

>

> or " true knowledge " ?

>

> indeed..

>

> what can be " false " ?

 

The content of thought, as it refers solely to a nonexistent past and/or

future.

-tim-

 

That is a fact, truth, as memory contents, movement of electrons in a brain.

-geo-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> Tim G.

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 13, 2009 10:27 AM

> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > who is this " I " that is " aware " of this " state of affairs " ?

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> Asking " somebody else " this question is the very height of silliness.

> -tim-

>

> No tim!!! He is not asking anything - he is pointing!!!

> -geo-

 

Are ya sure? Seems here he was asking the question. Could be he was pointing,

tho, I dunno.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 AM

> > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:45 AM

> > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > we are one.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > what's not to hear.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If we're one, my good fella, there's not-two to communicate.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Whoops! ;-).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Peace, bro...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > you're a phony.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > hear that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > LOL!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Love u 2 ;-).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hugs...

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > we are one.

> > > > >

> > > > > what's to hug?

> > > > >

> > > > > wouldn't that be self abuse?

> > > > >

> > > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > > Bodies can still hug bodies, of course, silly.

> > >

> > > oh i see..

> > >

> > > all is one except there are lots of " bodies " .

> > > -bbb-

> > >

> > > That is the way it is. My body is felt here...yours there

> > > -geo-

> >

> > who's feeling either one?

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > I only know the feeling here. Dont know about that body there. This

> > diversity of things is part of the one consciousness there is.

> > -geo-

>

> Bob: The body is a biological, multi-cellular organism.

>

> There's no " who " in it. That one comes out of owls ;-).

 

 

 

and who knows that?

 

what is an organism?

 

the words and meanings are on a par with the grunts of pigs?

 

if this is so..

 

why the fuck bother with any of it?

 

wallow and wonder then.

 

..b b.b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...