Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > yes.

> >

> > the talking is just a current of the water

> >

> > the water is not wet to itself

> >

> > it has no quality whatsoever

>

> How in the heck would the water 'know' it has no quality whatsoever?

>

> What to compare to, to derive 'no quality'?

>

> 'No quality' is a lack of quality. Does this water lack something?

 

 

It is not-knowing.

 

Which is neither knowing nor not knowing.

 

Not a lack of anything.

 

Because there is no comparison, there is no quality.

 

It is alive as this unknown, not reflecting back on itself to give itself form,

or knowledge, or memory.

 

- D -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Friday, July 03, 2009 1:13 PM

Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > Tim G.

> > Nisargadatta

> > Friday, July 03, 2009 12:40 PM

> > Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > Tim G.

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Friday, July 03, 2009 12:20 PM

> > > Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Water ain't talkin'.

> > > > -t-

> > > > Water is not talking? Who is talking then?

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Always, the 'other' is asked.

> > >

> > > So, the question keeps coming up.

> > > -t-

> > >

> > > The question is not to another. What other is there who can talk?

> > > -geo-

> >

> > When one is looking for an answer, and not just sitting with the

> > question,

> > it's to another.

> > -t-

> > Yes. So who othere is there that can talk?

> > -ego-

>

> Sorry, there's just no way a perceived 'someone else' can answer this.

>

> Any answer one gets simply raises the question again.

 

Nisargadatta:

 

" If in the state of witnessing you ask yourself: 'Who am I?', the answer

comes at once, though it is wordless and silent. Cease to be the object and

become the subject of all that happens; once having turned within, you will

find yourself beyond the subject. When you have found yourself, you will

find that you are also beyond the object, that both the subject and the

object exist in you, but you are neither. "

 

geo> So, water talks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 3/7/2009 13:33:41

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Friday, July 03, 2009 1:17 PM

Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> Tim G.

> Nisargadatta

> Friday, July 03, 2009 12:43 PM

> Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > > Water is not talking? Who is talking then?

> > > -geo-

> >

> > Always, the 'other' is asked.

> >

> > So, the question keeps coming up.

> > -t-

> >

> > The question is not to another. What other is there who can talk?

> > -geo-

>

> See?

>

> The same question just came up, again.

> -t-

>

> Why are you saying this again?

> -geo-

 

Give it up. Self-enquiry is *not* other-enquiry, whether there are 'no

others' or not. Asking others questions that only oneself can answer is

fruitless.

-t-

 

That is why water is the talking

-geo-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 3/7/2009 13:33:41

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta:

>

> " If in the state of witnessing you ask yourself: 'Who am I?', the answer

> comes at once, though it is wordless and silent. Cease to be the object and

> become the subject of all that happens; once having turned within, you will

> find yourself beyond the subject. When you have found yourself, you will

> find that you are also beyond the object, that both the subject and the

> object exist in you, but you are neither. "

>

> geo> So, water talks.

 

Talks, and answers.

 

Which means it hasn't said or heard a word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

> It is alive as this unknown, not reflecting back on itself to give

> itself form, or knowledge, or memory.

>

> - D -

 

Ain't nothin' can 'reflect back on itself'... so, it never did reflect back on

itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Always, the 'other' is asked.

So, the question keeps coming up.

-t-

 

When geo asks a question, he is not asking a tim out there to show " me " the way.

I am not expecting tim out there to give me something, although " learning " is

not an excuded possibility. Question is an invitation to look. I look " here " and

you should look " there " . So you don have to keep repeating this " dont ask

another " thing over and over again because it invites geo to say:

.....well...then do it.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Geovani

Nisargadatta

Friday, July 03, 2009 3:45 PM

Re: Free of Consciousness - From Nis.

 

 

 

 

 

Always, the 'other' is asked.

So, the question keeps coming up.

-t-

 

When geo asks a question, he is not asking a tim out there to show " me " the

way. I am not expecting tim out there to give me something, although

" learning " is not an excuded possibility. Question is an invitation to look.

I look " here " and you should look " there " . So you don have to keep repeating

this " dont ask another " thing over and over again because it invites geo to

say: ....well...then do it.

 

The reason for putting it in form of a question instead of statements like

" do this...do that...dont do this or that " is that it usually those call

for a reaction. There is only one " place " in this universe and i know where

it is.... so no need to keep repeating that stuff.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Geovani " <inandor wrote:

>

> Always, the 'other' is asked.

> So, the question keeps coming up.

> -t-

>

> When geo asks a question, he is not asking a tim out there to show " me " the

way. I am not expecting tim out there to give me something, although " learning "

is not an excuded possibility. Question is an invitation to look. I look " here "

and you should look " there " . So you don have to keep repeating this " dont ask

another " thing over and over again because it invites geo to say:

.....well...then do it.

> -geo-

 

Mmm kay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> The reason for putting it in form of a question instead of statements like

> " do this...do that...dont do this or that " is that it usually those call

> for a reaction.

 

Flat statements aren't perceived here as being dictated to -- for whatever it's

worth.

 

In fact, being asked a question is like being dictated to. Something is being

demanded.

 

Flat statements are just that -- statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> > The reason for putting it in form of a question instead of statements like

> > " do this...do that...dont do this or that " is that it usually those call

> > for a reaction.

>

> Flat statements aren't perceived here as being dictated to -- for whatever

it's worth.

>

> In fact, being asked a question is like being dictated to. Something is being

demanded.

>

> Flat statements are just that -- statements.

 

But, of course, speak the way ya like. The above is for informational/curiosity

purposes only ;-).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > It is alive as this unknown, not reflecting back on itself to give

> > itself form, or knowledge, or memory.

> >

> > - D -

>

> Ain't nothin' can 'reflect back on itself'... so, it never did reflect back on

itself.

 

conceptuality reflects back on conceptuality

 

and it seems very convincing

 

until it doesn't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > It is alive as this unknown, not reflecting back on itself to give

> > > itself form, or knowledge, or memory.

> > >

> > > - D -

> >

> > Ain't nothin' can 'reflect back on itself'... so, it never did reflect back

on itself.

>

> conceptuality reflects back on conceptuality

>

> and it seems very convincing

>

> until it doesn't

 

Conceptuality reflects back on conceptuality,

even with the assumption of this writing here

'reflecting back' on some previous writing,

as in the writing above this writing.

 

In truth, this is new writing, addressing 'now',

Not anything above it.

 

The words emit from 'nowness',

and do not address anything or anyone at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...