Guest guest Report post Posted February 16, 2009 perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. has come from mathematics. some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the mathematician. " hmm. this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. the five most important symbols of mathematics: 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). this union was regarded as mystic union. it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. algebra by the symbol i.. geometry by pi.. and analysis by the transcendental e. Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. David Eugene Smith wrote: " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. `God eternally geometrizes.' " ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > has come from mathematics. > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > mathematician. " > > hmm. > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > geometry by pi.. > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > .b b.b. > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. toombaru Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > has come from mathematics. > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > mathematician. " > > hmm. > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > geometry by pi.. > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > .b b.b. > bbb became religious?.... one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to an imaginary God....out there?..... if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also must be nobody and nothing Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > mathematician. " > > > > hmm. > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > toombaru > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get nicely brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of time.... getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... and ever have been etc Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > mathematician. " > > > > hmm. > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > toombaru oh for god's sake.. nobody is talking about a " big guy in the sky " . are you fucking nuts? the math uses the term " God " in a manner that eludes you. you are expressing the childish attributes of a " Nobodaddy " .. to an abstract formulation that flies over your head. what crap! get an education. the formulation is not an inference. it is as factual and as proven as 1+1=2. stay away from that for which you have no understanding or talent. you expose your own limited grasp of what's being discussed. stick with your silly metaphors. now that's where you shine. your air-headed notions seem cute there at least. leave the more esoteric studies and formulations.. to those who understand what the hell they are talking about. jeeze! b.b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > mathematician. " > > > > hmm. > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to an > imaginary God....out there?..... > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also must > be nobody and nothing > > > Marc uh marc.. that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. don't fall into the toombaru trap. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > Imagination " : > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into > its > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > the > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > truth. " > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > science. > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant > in > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th > century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in > churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get nicely > brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of time.... > getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great > attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... > > and ever have been > > etc > > > Marc you guys are both too religious. your religion is called " me " , " my shadow " , " my beliefs " . drop all that. become the equation. there is no choice in any event. it should be clear as day.. if you understand the mathematical statement. you both have gone off on some far out tangent.. dealing with childish notions and attempts to make concrete.. that which the sides of the equation.. in an harmonic resonance.. CANNOT be made objective, concrete or be denied. only fools fall in where even angels fear to tread. the best minds of the planet past and present have studied this math. and have done so with the greatest of awe and respect. not one of them have claimed to " understand " that formula in toto. yet here you two scientifically illeterati have decided.. that you somehow DO get it. ridiculous. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > oh for god's sake.. > > nobody is talking about a " big guy in the sky " . > > are you fucking nuts? > > the math uses the term " God " in a manner that eludes you. > > you are expressing the childish attributes of a " Nobodaddy " .. > > to an abstract formulation that flies over your head. > > what crap! > > get an education. > > the formulation is not an inference. > > it is as factual and as proven as 1+1=2. > > stay away from that for which you have no understanding or talent. > > you expose your own limited grasp of what's being discussed. > > stick with your silly metaphors. > > now that's where you shine. > > your air-headed notions seem cute there at least. > > leave the more esoteric studies and formulations.. > > to those who understand what the hell they are talking about. > > jeeze! > > b.b.b. p.s. i know that at your advance age that you cannot trust a fart. it could be a shitty mistake if you did. but when you hold them in like you do toombaru.. they travel up your spine and give you all those shitty notions. then those infantile mumpsimuses that posses you... force you to obstinately maintain your stupid position. which then in a faulty mnemotechnic manner.. impel you go on and on like the energizer bunny.. repeating forever and ever that you understand that which you don't. try and up the wattage. these rebuttals of yours are too dimwitted to tolerate. and they illuminate nothing at all. the only one they seem " bright " to is yourself. you are in the dark regarding these matters. that is likely fearful for you but.. just suck it up grandpa. you're not a kid anymore. quit acting and talking like one. surely the time has come to put away your childish " things " .. face straight ahead and look not behind.. back there..among your fave teacher's words.. it's all debris that has already floated downstream. the flotsam and jetsam of the oncoming " ahead " .. will knock your boat over if you don't follow these instructions. quit relying on the tippy canoe that is your self.. and all it's erroneous beliefs. face what's coming and forget what's gone away. you enjoy rummaging through all those old pictures of the past. look out ahead! or..continue to be hit by your own bad and blind 'self' navigation. lose that silly self and you'll see that what's ahead.. is as empty as what 'you' are leaving behind and where 'you' are. but then...after all these years... after all the casting of pearls before you.. it's clear that it all falls on deaf ears. now quick! think..think...think.. " how can toombaru come out looking good.. here where again he has fallen? " the answer is.. you can't silly. whatever you say only looks sillier.. and even more defensive of yourself and your bullshit. but go ahead.. PROTECT at all cost.. that self image that you so cherish. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > oh for god's sake.. > > nobody is talking about a " big guy in the sky " . > > are you fucking nuts? > > the math uses the term " God " in a manner that eludes you. > > you are expressing the childish attributes of a " Nobodaddy " .. > > to an abstract formulation that flies over your head. > > what crap! > > get an education. > > the formulation is not an inference. > > it is as factual and as proven as 1+1=2. > > stay away from that for which you have no understanding or talent. > > you expose your own limited grasp of what's being discussed. > > stick with your silly metaphors. > > now that's where you shine. > > your air-headed notions seem cute there at least. > > leave the more esoteric studies and formulations.. > > to those who understand what the hell they are talking about. > > jeeze! > > b.b.b. > The human mind falls into the same old trap over and over and over. In its attempt to validate its pseudo-reality, it locks into a personal philosophy. A personal philosophy that is its totality. It doesn't matter if it is a Jehovah's witness, a voodoo priestess or a math major who thinks they have found something in numbers that they imagine no one else understands. They Have the truth. And if they do......they also must possess a substantial reality. One of the sure signs of their unstable ground is their immediate attack on anybody who questions their self bolstering thought processes. Funny little monkeys. toombaru Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant in > > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > oh for god's sake.. > > > > nobody is talking about a " big guy in the sky " . > > > > are you fucking nuts? > > > > the math uses the term " God " in a manner that eludes you. > > > > you are expressing the childish attributes of a " Nobodaddy " .. > > > > to an abstract formulation that flies over your head. > > > > what crap! > > > > get an education. > > > > the formulation is not an inference. > > > > it is as factual and as proven as 1+1=2. > > > > stay away from that for which you have no understanding or talent. > > > > you expose your own limited grasp of what's being discussed. > > > > stick with your silly metaphors. > > > > now that's where you shine. > > > > your air-headed notions seem cute there at least. > > > > leave the more esoteric studies and formulations.. > > > > to those who understand what the hell they are talking about. > > > > jeeze! > > > > b.b.b. > > > > > > The human mind falls into the same old trap over and over and over. > > In its attempt to validate its pseudo-reality, it locks into a > personal philosophy. > > A personal philosophy that is its totality. > > It doesn't matter if it is a Jehovah's witness, a voodoo priestess or > a math major who thinks they have found something in numbers that they > imagine no one else understands. > > They Have the truth. > > And if they do......they also must possess a substantial reality. > > One of the sure signs of their unstable ground is their immediate > attack on anybody who questions their self bolstering thought processes. > > Funny little monkeys. toombaru well.. that's " your " truth anyway. dumb as it is. no more mother's milk for you toomie. i've been being far to maternal and kind with out. time for you to get off the tit. you're gonna hafta go'er alone now kid. who was talking about anything " substantial " ? you just don't get it. you're stuck in your silly metaphorical nonsense. there is NOTHING to find guy. when you find THAT.. that NOTHING.. you may return. until such time.. which at this rate will never arrive.. enjoy your nap son... but don't mess your nest like the other monkeys. that may stink more than your idea of what's clever. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 > > well.. > > that's " your " truth anyway. > > dumb as it is. > > no more mother's milk for you toomie. > > i've been being far to maternal and kind with out. > > time for you to get off the tit. > > you're gonna hafta go'er alone now kid. > > who was talking about anything " substantial " ? > > you just don't get it. > > you're stuck in your silly metaphorical nonsense. > > there is NOTHING to find guy. > > when you find THAT.. > > that NOTHING.. > > you may return. > > until such time.. > > which at this rate will never arrive.. > > enjoy your nap son... > > but don't mess your nest like the other monkeys. > > that may stink more than your idea of what's clever. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > Oh come on......you come up with some obscure mathimatical formula that you can't figure out and decide that it somehow implies the existence of a creator god. And yes........in order of it to be a god......it has to be a creator god. And when someone calls you on the childishness of your belief you attack. Your belief structure is no different that any other " true believer " . You feel deeply that you have discovered something of great significance....some secret formula.....something that you claim " other great minds " have also concluded....... The reason that you are having trouble putting it into words is: because like all secret formulas concerning the nature of reality.....it is smoke and mirrors. It is the same old infantile thought process out of which all creation stories are spun. It is within the arena of creativity that the infant will begin to make his transition into the egoic-material world by finding or discovering a " transitional object. This can be a blanket a teddy bear a story book or a math problem. All of which afford him the magical belief that he is moving toward the primal caretaker that changed his diapers or fed him when he cried. He is pre-wired from childhood to seek a resolution to his inherent existential confusion. For most this quest never ends and it sure as hell won't be resolved in the speculation about an unsolvable math problem. Grow up for Christsakes and stop thinking that you have it all figured out. toombaru Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to an > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also must > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > Marc uh marc.. > > that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. > > don't fall into the toombaru trap. > > .b b.b. > bbb, don't fall already into the " bbb " trap.... Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into > > its > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > > the > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > truth. " > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > science. > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence extant > > in > > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to human > > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of understanding > > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human thought > > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th > > century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in > > churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get nicely > > brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of time.... > > getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great > > attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... > > > > and ever have been > > > > etc > > > > > > Marc > > > you guys are both too religious. > > your religion is called " me " , " my shadow " , " my beliefs " . > > drop all that. > > become the equation. > > there is no choice in any event. > > it should be clear as day.. > > if you understand the mathematical statement. > > you both have gone off on some far out tangent.. > > dealing with childish notions and attempts to make concrete.. > > that which the sides of the equation.. in an harmonic resonance.. > > CANNOT be made objective, concrete or be denied. > > only fools fall in where even angels fear to tread. > > the best minds of the planet past and present have studied this math. > > and have done so with the greatest of awe and respect. > > not one of them have claimed to " understand " that formula in toto. > > yet here you two scientifically illeterati have decided.. > > that you somehow DO get it. > > ridiculous. > > .b b.b. > and then now....life is of a " mathematical statement " ....?... are you serious?.... i mean, seriously joking?.... Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the Imagination " : > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into its > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, the > > mathematician. " > > > > hmm. > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth. " > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other science. > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to an > imaginary God....out there?..... > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also must > be nobody and nothing > > > Marc > Ps: the love of this your imaginary " God " is the love of All.... the love of All is this your imaginary " God " wake up bbb Here we Are... " bbb " , " Marc " , " toombaru " ....and even " Werner " ....(lol)....are of One being......One heart.....One Self....One Soul enjoy It... or don't...enjoy It up to imaginary " bbb " Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > > well.. > > > > that's " your " truth anyway. > > > > dumb as it is. > > > > no more mother's milk for you toomie. > > > > i've been being far to maternal and kind with out. > > > > time for you to get off the tit. > > > > you're gonna hafta go'er alone now kid. > > > > who was talking about anything " substantial " ? > > > > you just don't get it. > > > > you're stuck in your silly metaphorical nonsense. > > > > there is NOTHING to find guy. > > > > when you find THAT.. > > > > that NOTHING.. > > > > you may return. > > > > until such time.. > > > > which at this rate will never arrive.. > > > > enjoy your nap son... > > > > but don't mess your nest like the other monkeys. > > > > that may stink more than your idea of what's clever. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > Oh come on......you come up with some obscure mathimatical formula > that you can't figure out and decide that it somehow implies the > existence of a creator god. well firstly sir ignoramus it's mathematical " not " mathimatical " . secondly, I didn't come up with it. thirdly, unlike you, i CAN figure it out. that I don't understand what it means does not mean.. that it's not " calculable " . YOU don't understand the not understanding that is involved with this. of course Biffy..there is little that you ever do understand. LOL! and lastly jerkoff, it's YOU who is implying things here. the equation does not " imply " anything.. it " proves " implications. your 'take' (on it or of it) sort of implies that you're dumb. you're the living proof of that implication. t.= d* (wherein t. equates to [you know who]) and .. d* represents the inability to count one's fingers) > And yes........in order of it to be a god......it has to be a creator god. > > And when someone calls you on the childishness of your belief you attack. no i don't attack. i point out the attacker. it's your own inept belief that attacks you. my you're so emotionally tender and sensitive as well as dimwitted. the " creator god in this equation.. has so little to do with your immature concept.. it's beyond laughable. stick to your bad attempts at metaphorical hokum. at least you can stay out of trouble.. i'm sure your own claptrap pleases little toomie and keeps him safe. but truly i say unto you, there is naught to be afraid of. no need for these childish outbursts. rock-a-bye toomie. > Your belief structure is no different that any other " true believer " . do you truly believe that you old belief structure you? do you believe that makes you different? LOL! > You feel deeply that you have discovered something of great > significance....some secret formula.....something that you claim > " other great minds " have also concluded....... I didn't say that 'my' mind was great. you consistently read into that which is written.. something which is not there...but only in your limited mind. you don't read at all actually. you're to busy trying to think about what you will say in return. and you never say anything cogent to what has been said. you just blurt out more fart material. sad...and funny too. LOL! > The reason that you are having trouble putting it into words is: > because like all secret formulas concerning the nature of > reality.....it is smoke and mirrors. kinda like you huh. no. try this dummy.. put into words: [-4}ab+ pi. x a.b=4^ cosign +/- 6g>ab at it's cubed valence.. in random non-sequence]. now that's not a " secret formula " . it's known in torsion mechanics and is employed in spacecraft design. now give it to me in words. or do you believe that spacecraft too are just a 'smoke and mirrors'? > It is the same old infantile thought process out of which all creation > stories are spun. to which all infantile refutation feels compelled to cry about. you whine a lot when you don't understand. but that's the way your thought process works. you can't help yourself. i understand. it's the same old childish toombaru...spun out as always. LOL! > It is within the arena of creativity that the infant will begin to > make his transition into the egoic-material world by finding or > discovering a " transitional object. " arena of creativity " ..hmmm. i thought you didn't believe in " creator gods " .. just " creator " kids and arenas huh? i thought you had said there are no 'things'..about a million times. now you say the infant finds " transitional object " thingies. what kind of bi-polar egoic-material world do you live in? better brush up on whatever the hell it is you are trying to say. you're sounding more like you're upset about something.. than you are sounding like you want an adult conversation. chill toombaru. it's ok to be wrong. it better be or you're in deep trouble..all the time. > This can be a blanket a teddy bear a story book or a math problem. > > All of which afford him the magical belief that he is moving toward > the primal caretaker that changed his diapers or fed him when he cried. like i said you don't get it. no one..and i mean no one.. not i..not the framer of the equation..not any of the 'great minds'.. ever is or has been talking about a 'primal caretaker'. that idea however is your prime problem. your notion of what is being discussed.. is based on your grade school ideas. did the nuns or whoever really convince you? somehow that doesn't move me. it makes me laugh. did you ever get beyond elementary school? seriously, i ask you. > He is pre-wired from childhood to seek a resolution to his inherent > existential confusion. you're confused. the infant doesn't waste it's time. it doesn't 'think' anything for it to be confused about. and sure as hell there isn't anything to think about in your b.s. besides..you ARE the thinking. that's your existential confusion. LOL! > For most this quest never ends and it sure as hell won't be resolved > in the speculation about an unsolvable math problem. the equation doesn't try and solve anything. it is a solution. there is no problem. except and only in your mind. and i doubt if that's even relevant. it's just too small an item to be considered or concerned about. it's not addressed in the equation. it's ignored as insignificant. > Grow up for Christsakes and stop thinking that you have it all figured > out. > > > > > toombaru i have nothing figured out. i've said that countless times. but you think that i think that i have figured it out. go figure. no don't try. we always wind up having to correct you.. whenever you try and figure anything out. ROFLMAO! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > formula. " > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > into its > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > the > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > truth. " > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > science. > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to > an > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also > must > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uh marc.. > > > > that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. > > > > don't fall into the toombaru trap. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > bbb, don't fall already into the " bbb " trap.... > > Marc that statement is falling into the mark " trip " . :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > into > > > its > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > scientists, > > > the > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence > extant > > > in > > > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to > human > > > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of > understanding > > > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human > thought > > > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th > > > century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in > > > churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get nicely > > > brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of > time.... > > > getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great > > > attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... > > > > > > and ever have been > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > you guys are both too religious. > > > > your religion is called " me " , " my shadow " , " my beliefs " . > > > > drop all that. > > > > become the equation. > > > > there is no choice in any event. > > > > it should be clear as day.. > > > > if you understand the mathematical statement. > > > > you both have gone off on some far out tangent.. > > > > dealing with childish notions and attempts to make concrete.. > > > > that which the sides of the equation.. in an harmonic resonance.. > > > > CANNOT be made objective, concrete or be denied. > > > > only fools fall in where even angels fear to tread. > > > > the best minds of the planet past and present have studied this > math. > > > > and have done so with the greatest of awe and respect. > > > > not one of them have claimed to " understand " that formula in toto. > > > > yet here you two scientifically illeterati have decided.. > > > > that you somehow DO get it. > > > > ridiculous. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > and then now....life is of a " mathematical statement " ....?... > > are you serious?.... > > i mean, seriously joking?.... > > > Marc i dunno. do the math and see. what is life? :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > Imagination " : > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into > its > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > the > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > truth. " > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > science. > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to > an > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also > must > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > Marc > > > > > Ps: the love of this your imaginary " God " is the love of All.... > > the love of All is this your imaginary " God " > > wake up bbb > > Here we Are... > > " bbb " , " Marc " , " toombaru " ....and even " Werner " ....(lol)....are of One > being......One heart.....One Self....One Soul > > enjoy It... > > or don't...enjoy It > > up to imaginary " bbb " > > Marc ..b b.b. isn't up to anything. ..b b.b. IS up..and down..and over..and around. imagine that! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > > into its > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > > the > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > science. > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to > > an > > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also > > must > > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uh marc.. > > > > > > that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. > > > > > > don't fall into the toombaru trap. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > bbb, don't fall already into the " bbb " trap.... > > > > Marc > > > that statement is falling into the mark " trip " . > > :-) > > .b b.b. > for you, " bbb " ....there is only the " bbb " trip.... " bbb " can never have any ideas about the trip of anybody else........* Marc *even not about his beloved " God " Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > > into > > > > its > > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > > scientists, > > > > the > > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence > > extant > > > > in > > > > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself to > > human > > > > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > > > > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of > > understanding > > > > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human > > thought > > > > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th > > > > century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in > > > > churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get nicely > > > > brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of > > time.... > > > > getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great > > > > attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... > > > > > > > > and ever have been > > > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > you guys are both too religious. > > > > > > your religion is called " me " , " my shadow " , " my beliefs " . > > > > > > drop all that. > > > > > > become the equation. > > > > > > there is no choice in any event. > > > > > > it should be clear as day.. > > > > > > if you understand the mathematical statement. > > > > > > you both have gone off on some far out tangent.. > > > > > > dealing with childish notions and attempts to make concrete.. > > > > > > that which the sides of the equation.. in an harmonic resonance.. > > > > > > CANNOT be made objective, concrete or be denied. > > > > > > only fools fall in where even angels fear to tread. > > > > > > the best minds of the planet past and present have studied this > > math. > > > > > > and have done so with the greatest of awe and respect. > > > > > > not one of them have claimed to " understand " that formula in toto. > > > > > > yet here you two scientifically illeterati have decided.. > > > > > > that you somehow DO get it. > > > > > > ridiculous. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > and then now....life is of a " mathematical statement " ....?... > > > > are you serious?.... > > > > i mean, seriously joking?.... > > > > > > Marc > > > i dunno. > > do the math and see. > > what is life? > > :-) > > .b b.b. > life is a joke some give a meaning to the joke some don't lol Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's formula. " > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire into > > its > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the scientists, > > the > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > truth. " > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > science. > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up to > > an > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God also > > must > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > Ps: the love of this your imaginary " God " is the love of All.... > > > > the love of All is this your imaginary " God " > > > > wake up bbb > > > > Here we Are... > > > > " bbb " , " Marc " , " toombaru " ....and even " Werner " ....(lol)....are of One > > being......One heart.....One Self....One Soul > > > > enjoy It... > > > > or don't...enjoy It > > > > up to imaginary " bbb " > > > > Marc > > > .b b.b. isn't up to anything. > > .b b.b. IS up..and down..and over..and around. > > imagine that! > > .b b.b. > no need to imagine... i see this " bbb " moving around in his imaginary box.... sometimes up, then down, then around... .....etc give up " bbb " you aren't! and never have been! lol Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = > 0.. > > > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > > > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > > > into its > > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > scientists, > > > the > > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math > tree: > > > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the > formula: > > > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all > up to > > > an > > > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God > also > > > must > > > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uh marc.. > > > > > > > > that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. > > > > > > > > don't fall into the toombaru trap. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb, don't fall already into the " bbb " trap.... > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > that statement is falling into the mark " trip " . > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > for you, " bbb " ....there is only the " bbb " trip.... > " bbb " can never have any ideas about the trip of anybody > else........* > > > > Marc > > > *even not about his beloved " God " is that a trap trip? ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = > > 0.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > > > > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > > > > into its > > > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > > scientists, > > > > the > > > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math > > tree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the > > formula: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all > > up to > > > > an > > > > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God > > also > > > > must > > > > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uh marc.. > > > > > > > > > > that's exactly and only what the formula is proving. > > > > > > > > > > don't fall into the toombaru trap. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb, don't fall already into the " bbb " trap.... > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > that statement is falling into the mark " trip " . > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > for you, " bbb " ....there is only the " bbb " trip.... > > " bbb " can never have any ideas about the trip of anybody > > else........* > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > *even not about his beloved " God " > > > is that a trap trip? > > .b b.b. > as i told you.... there is only the one and only bbb trip Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = > 0.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > > > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to > inquire > > > into > > > > > its > > > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > > > scientists, > > > > > the > > > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math > tree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the > formula: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be > the > > > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than > other > > > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To infer the existence of a higher or mystical intelligence > > > extant > > > > > in > > > > > > the universe merely because something does not lend itself > to > > > human > > > > > > mentation only refers to the limitation of human thinking. > > > > > > > > > > > > The attempt to attribute that which it is incapable of > > > understanding > > > > > > to the 'God dun it " kind of thinking says more about human > > > thought > > > > > > than is does about the existence of a big guy in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after many centuries of religious wars......still in 21th > > > > > century.....this your mentionned " human " meet in > > > > > churches/temples....in order to loose their mind......get > nicely > > > > > brainwashed....and feeling happy for some little durations of > > > time.... > > > > > getting some tears here & there....and exchange/share the great > > > > > attitude.....to have No idea about who & what they are..... > > > > > > > > > > and ever have been > > > > > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > you guys are both too religious. > > > > > > > > your religion is called " me " , " my shadow " , " my beliefs " . > > > > > > > > drop all that. > > > > > > > > become the equation. > > > > > > > > there is no choice in any event. > > > > > > > > it should be clear as day.. > > > > > > > > if you understand the mathematical statement. > > > > > > > > you both have gone off on some far out tangent.. > > > > > > > > dealing with childish notions and attempts to make concrete.. > > > > > > > > that which the sides of the equation.. in an harmonic > resonance.. > > > > > > > > CANNOT be made objective, concrete or be denied. > > > > > > > > only fools fall in where even angels fear to tread. > > > > > > > > the best minds of the planet past and present have studied this > > > math. > > > > > > > > and have done so with the greatest of awe and respect. > > > > > > > > not one of them have claimed to " understand " that formula in > toto. > > > > > > > > yet here you two scientifically illeterati have decided.. > > > > > > > > that you somehow DO get it. > > > > > > > > ridiculous. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then now....life is of a " mathematical statement " ....?... > > > > > > are you serious?.... > > > > > > i mean, seriously joking?.... > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > i dunno. > > > > do the math and see. > > > > what is life? > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > life is a joke > > some give a meaning to the joke > > some don't > > lol > > Marc that figures. now let's see.. if we assume a = life..and b = joke: therefore.. a = b. hey! that's a cancellation process too. wherby.. a = b = 0 (meaning). not hard at all. but i don't see the point. of course.. ..b b.b. is an invariant that is not part of the equation. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 18, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > perhaps the most unusual argument for evidence of God.. > > > > > > > > > > has come from mathematics. > > > > > > > > > > some have suggested that the compact formula: ei*pi + 1 = 0.. > > > > > > > > > > is surely proof of a Creator calling this formula " God's > formula. " > > > > > > > > > > Edward Kasner and James Newman in " Mathematics and the > > > Imagination " : > > > > > > > > > > " We can only reproduce the equation and not stop to inquire > into > > > its > > > > > implications. It appeals equally to the mystic, the > scientists, > > > the > > > > > mathematician. " > > > > > > > > > > hmm. > > > > > > > > > > this formula of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) unites.. > > > > > > > > > > the five most important symbols of mathematics: > > > > > > > > > > 1, 0, pi, e and i (the square root of minus one). > > > > > > > > > > this union was regarded as mystic union. > > > > > > > > > > it contains representatives from each branch of the math tree: > > > > > > > > > > arithmetic is represented by 0 and 1.. > > > > > > > > > > algebra by the symbol i.. > > > > > > > > > > geometry by pi.. > > > > > > > > > > and analysis by the transcendental e. > > > > > > > > > > Harvard mathematician Benjamin Pierce said about the formula: > > > > > > > > > > " That is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical.. > > > > > > > > > > we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means.. > > > > > > > > > > but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the > > > truth. " > > > > > > > > > > mathematics certainly says more in fewer " words " than other > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > David Eugene Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > " The formula, ei*pi + 1 = 0 expressed a world of thought.. > > > > > > > > > > of truth, of poetry, and of the religious spirit. > > > > > > > > > > `God eternally geometrizes.' " > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bbb became religious?.... > > > > > > > > one of this dual freaks who are giving all up / leaving all up > to > > > an > > > > imaginary God....out there?..... > > > > > > > > if you claim to be nobody and nothing....then imaginary God > also > > > must > > > > be nobody and nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ps: the love of this your imaginary " God " is the love of All.... > > > > > > the love of All is this your imaginary " God " > > > > > > wake up bbb > > > > > > Here we Are... > > > > > > " bbb " , " Marc " , " toombaru " ....and even " Werner " ....(lol)....are of > One > > > being......One heart.....One Self....One Soul > > > > > > enjoy It... > > > > > > or don't...enjoy It > > > > > > up to imaginary " bbb " > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > .b b.b. isn't up to anything. > > > > .b b.b. IS up..and down..and over..and around. > > > > imagine that! > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > no need to imagine... > > i see this " bbb " moving around in his imaginary box.... > > sometimes up, then down, then around... > > ....etc > > give up " bbb " > > you aren't! > > and never have been! > > lol > > > Marc who just said that? i'm not here to be spoken to. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
