moments past and future/Knowing

[Guest guest]

--- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote:

 

> Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote:

>

> > I remember going for horse back riding on the indian

> > reservation in Taos , with a friend.

> > Riding on the mesa, toward the mountain range...at

> > some points our horses stopped abruptly, like if there

> > was an invisible wall that only them could see.

> > We couldn`t make them go any further. My horse had and

> > has never done that again.

> > So in the evening i went to talk to old Franck Water.

> > He lives at the edge of the reservation and is a

> > writer. His awesome memory has never failed him.

> > He related to us of a pretty gruesome murder that

> > happened about a decade ago, right at the place we

> > descibed.

> > I always wondered about that...kind of understood how

> > past moments are always there, and then future too,

> > maybe. gave me the shivers..

> >

> > Patricia

>

> And indeed, as you say, the future is present, too.

>

> What I am doing now is as much involved with the requirments of the

> future that is present, as it involves patterns related to the past

> being present.

>

> But memory can only view the past.

>

> And that is its limitation.

>

> Thought can only provide a commentary.

>

> And that is its limitation.

>

> *Knowing* - not in the sense of word-ideas, is available, but not

> provided by thought, memory, word exchanges.

>

> Your horse knows this to be so!

>

> -- Dan

>

 

and *Knowing*... (I believe I understand the special

sense you are using it in there)...

notice how that is *silent*?

 

and something very distilled about it...

 

and one can't *have* that Knowing...

there is only *being it*....

 

Bill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , pliantheart <pliantheart wrote:

 

> > And indeed, as you say, the future is present, too.

> >

> > What I am doing now is as much involved with the requirments of the

> > future that is present, as it involves patterns related to the past

> > being present.

> >

> > But memory can only view the past.

> >

> > And that is its limitation.

> >

> > Thought can only provide a commentary.

> >

> > And that is its limitation.

> >

> > *Knowing* - not in the sense of word-ideas, is available, but not

> > provided by thought, memory, word exchanges.

> >

> > Your horse knows this to be so!

> >

> > -- Dan

> >

>

> and *Knowing*... (I believe I understand the special

> sense you are using it in there)...

> notice how that is *silent*?

>

> and something very distilled about it...

>

> and one can't *have* that Knowing...

> there is only *being it*....

>

> Bill

 

Yes, and not even able to say " being it " ...