Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 whats the purpose in fighting with words he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... in the end what are we fighting for... to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being beaten...what are we...their slaves ? mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes trying to kill the apparent dangerous-words... we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our loved- words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere words only ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > in the end what are we fighting for... > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes trying > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our loved- > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere words only > ...iietsa > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > in the end what are we fighting for... > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes trying > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our loved- > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere words only > ...iietsa > ............words are all I have......to steal you heart away. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes trying > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our loved- > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere words only > > ...iietsa > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > toombaru > my heart is not for steal... nothing can affect my heart... reactions is in the mind only... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes > > trying > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our > > loved- > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere > > words only > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > nothing can affect my heart... > > reactions is in the mind only... > > ...iietsa > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes > > > trying > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our > > > loved- > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere > > > words only > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > toombaru words are all [i ]have......to steal [YOU] heart away....???????? I... I...I...YOU...YOU...YOU...WHO...Who...Whoo..???????????????????? ........bob(the Cheshire not even a smile left over) P.S........Nobodaddy all the Way Down (or Up) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes > > > trying > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our > > > loved- > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere > > > words only > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > toombaru > I am not the one that imagine things... separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our > masters... > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from > being > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and > loving ? > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by > sometimes > > > > trying > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to > kill our > > > > loved- > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as > mere > > > > words only > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > toombaru > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... > ...iietsa > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is separation. Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to existence. Thinking is......itself separation. (Era......this one's for you) toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our > > masters... > > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from > > being > > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and > > loving ? > > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by > > sometimes > > > > > trying > > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to > > kill our > > > > > loved- > > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as > > mere > > > > > words only > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... > > ...iietsa > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is separation. > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to existence. > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > toombaru > I never think ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our > > > masters... > > > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them > from > > > being > > > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with > one > > > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and > > > loving ? > > > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by > > > sometimes > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying > to > > > kill our > > > > > > loved- > > > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words > as > > > mere > > > > > > words only > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > separation. > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > existence. > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > toombaru > > > > I never think > ...iietsa > You just did.......or thought you did. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > > > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our > > > > masters... > > > > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them > > from > > > > being > > > > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with > > one > > > > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and > > > > loving ? > > > > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite- words...by > > > > sometimes > > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying > > to > > > > kill our > > > > > > > loved- > > > > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words > > as > > > > mere > > > > > > > words only > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart > > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > separation. > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > existence. > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > I never think > > ...iietsa > > > > > You just did.......or thought you did. > > > toombaru > you imagine yourself to think...so much that you probably would go all the way and say that its a fact ? and because of this misidentification with the mind...you assume that it is a fact for me as well ? the mind and its activities is all in me alright...but I am not in the mind...I am not a mind-product... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " > <iietsa@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > > > > > he says this...she says > that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are > our > > > > > masters... > > > > > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect > them > > > from > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying > with > > > one > > > > > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise > and > > > > > loving ? > > > > > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite- > words...by > > > > > sometimes > > > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry > lions...trying > > > to > > > > > kill our > > > > > > > > loved- > > > > > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all > words > > > as > > > > > mere > > > > > > > > words only > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you > heart > > > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > > > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the > mind... > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > You just did.......or thought you did. > > > > > > toombaru > > > you imagine yourself to think...so much that you probably would go > all the way and say that its a fact ? > and because of this misidentification with the mind...you assume > that it is a fact for me as well ? > the mind and its activities is all in me alright...but I am not in > the mind...I am not a mind-product... > ...iietsa > Are you saying that you are merely a thought? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " > > <iietsa@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > > > > > > > > > > he says this...she says > > that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > > > > > > > > > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > > > > > > > > > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > > > > > > > > > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are > > our > > > > > > masters... > > > > > > > > > > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect > > them > > > > from > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > > > > > > > > > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying > > with > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise > > and > > > > > > loving ? > > > > > > > > > > > while trying to help survive our favorite- > > words...by > > > > > > sometimes > > > > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > > > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > > > > > > > > > > we tend to see some words like hungry > > lions...trying > > > > to > > > > > > kill our > > > > > > > > > loved- > > > > > > > > > > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all > > words > > > > as > > > > > > mere > > > > > > > > > words only > > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you > > heart > > > > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > > > > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the > > mind... > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > You just did.......or thought you did. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > you imagine yourself to think...so much that you probably would go > > all the way and say that its a fact ? > > and because of this misidentification with the mind...you assume > > that it is a fact for me as well ? > > the mind and its activities is all in me alright...but I am not in > > the mind...I am not a mind-product... > > ...iietsa > > > > > > Are you saying that you are merely a thought? > > > > toombaru > time is created by thought....and thinking is sustained by time... its a circle...made up by many thoughts...and I am not in time...time is in me... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........words are all I have......to steal you heart > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > my heart is not for steal... > > > > > > nothing can affect my heart... > > > > > > reactions is in the mind only... > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you imagine that they are separated? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > I am not the one that imagine things... > > > separation and its other side of the coin are both of the mind... > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > separation. > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > existence. > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > toombaru > > > > I never think > ...iietsa " I never cry. " Alice Cooper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is separation. > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to existence. > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > toombaru > I never think ....iietsa >>>>>>>>>>>> but thinking happens... thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... but if the car keys get lost there is some thinking going on to find them. " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... but there is still thinking... there is still problem solving... thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > whats the purpose in fighting with words > > he says this...she says that...fuss...fuss...fuss... > > in the end what are we fighting for... > > to win...to avoid loosing a battle with words ? > > words are mere jada jada...we act like they are our masters... > > we are sticking up for them like we must protect them from being > > beaten...what are we...their slaves ? > > mere idiots runing around this place identifying with one > > word....resisting another...pretending to be wise and loving ? > > while trying to help survive our favorite-words...by sometimes trying > > to kill the apparent dangerous-words... > > we tend to see some words like hungry lions...trying to kill our > loved- > > words...why is it so difficult to just see all words as mere words > only > > ...iietsa > > > > > two can be exchanging words one fighting the other not one trying to " best " the other the other not the one striving the other just being it is a matter of perspective Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > separation. > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > existence. > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > toombaru > > > > I never think > ...iietsa > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > but thinking happens... > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > but if the car keys get lost there is > some thinking going on to find them. > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > but there is still thinking... > > there is still problem solving... > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > Bill > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in time created by itself...I emphasize no thing... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > separation. > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > existence. > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > I never think > > ...iietsa > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > Bill > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in time > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > ...iietsa if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. I in no way emphasize thought. I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking that is not characterized by thought. So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't even use the word " thought " ! What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? Do you ever have to solve problems? Solving problems involves thinking by definition. But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if it is very different from what people ordinarily call thinking. As I said, solving problems entails thinking. What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > separation. > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > existence. > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > I never think > > ...iietsa > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > Bill > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in time > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > ...iietsa > Yes, the difference between freedom and bondage, if there is such a thing, is in the EMPHASIS. This is what all this is all about, emphasis. But Bill can Also be " right, " since there is also such a thing as over emphasis. Still, iietsa's poetry, and it is absolutely poetry, is beautiful. Bill's prose, is too. But whereas prose puts the accent there, poetry puts it here. ~*~ Sky (is not bob) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in time > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > ...iietsa > > if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. > > I in no way emphasize thought. > > I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking > that is not characterized by thought. > > So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't > even use the word " thought " ! > > What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? > Do you ever have to solve problems? > Solving problems involves thinking by definition. > > But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " > or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be > in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. > But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if > it is very different from what people ordinarily call > thinking. > > As I said, solving problems entails thinking. > What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? > Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? > > Bill > I never solve any " problems " ... ....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > <pliantheart@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in > time > > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > > ...iietsa > > > > if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. > > > > I in no way emphasize thought. > > > > I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking > > that is not characterized by thought. > > > > So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't > > even use the word " thought " ! > > > > What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? > > Do you ever have to solve problems? > > Solving problems involves thinking by definition. > > > > But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " > > or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be > > in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. > > But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if > > it is very different from what people ordinarily call > > thinking. > > > > As I said, solving problems entails thinking. > > What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? > > Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? > > > > Bill > > > > I never solve any " problems " ... > ...iietsa > So explain that a little more. Do you work for a living? What do you do all day? If you just sit staring at the wall, walking in nature etc. then lovely, and sure, no problem solving. Do you drive? You never answered my question as to what you do if you lose your car keys. What if something you regularly use stops working correctly? Do you just throw it away and get a new one? Or do you try to figure our what is wrong with it? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > <pliantheart@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines > things.....is > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in > > time > > > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. > > > > > > I in no way emphasize thought. > > > > > > I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking > > > that is not characterized by thought. > > > > > > So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't > > > even use the word " thought " ! > > > > > > What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? > > > Do you ever have to solve problems? > > > Solving problems involves thinking by definition. > > > > > > But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " > > > or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be > > > in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. > > > But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if > > > it is very different from what people ordinarily call > > > thinking. > > > > > > As I said, solving problems entails thinking. > > > What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? > > > Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > I never solve any " problems " ... > > ...iietsa > > > > So explain that a little more. > Do you work for a living? > What do you do all day? > If you just sit staring at the wall, > walking in nature etc. then lovely, > and sure, no problem solving. > > Do you drive? > You never answered my question as to > what you do if you lose your car keys. > > What if something you regularly use stops working > correctly? > Do you just throw it away and get a new one? > Or do you try to figure our what is wrong with it? > > Bill > Here, again. The only difference between what Bill is saying and what iietsa is saying, is emphasis. One emphasis results in Bill's prose, the other results in iietsa's poetry. And this whole relationship, here, is like that between Zorba and the intellectual. It makes a good movie. But both characters are absolutely necessary for there to be any narrative. One is attached to attachment, the other to detachment. Both love. But love, is neither. ~*~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > > <pliantheart@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines > > things.....is > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in > > > time > > > > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. > > > > > > > > I in no way emphasize thought. > > > > > > > > I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking > > > > that is not characterized by thought. > > > > > > > > So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't > > > > even use the word " thought " ! > > > > > > > > What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? > > > > Do you ever have to solve problems? > > > > Solving problems involves thinking by definition. > > > > > > > > But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " > > > > or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be > > > > in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. > > > > But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if > > > > it is very different from what people ordinarily call > > > > thinking. > > > > > > > > As I said, solving problems entails thinking. > > > > What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? > > > > Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > I never solve any " problems " ... > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > So explain that a little more. > > Do you work for a living? > > What do you do all day? > > If you just sit staring at the wall, > > walking in nature etc. then lovely, > > and sure, no problem solving. > > > > Do you drive? > > You never answered my question as to > > what you do if you lose your car keys. > > > > What if something you regularly use stops working > > correctly? > > Do you just throw it away and get a new one? > > Or do you try to figure our what is wrong with it? > > > > Bill > > > > > Here, again. The only difference between what Bill is saying and what > iietsa is saying, is emphasis. One emphasis results in Bill's prose, > the other results in iietsa's poetry. And this whole relationship, > here, is like that between Zorba and the intellectual. > > It makes a good movie. But both characters are absolutely necessary > for there to be any narrative. > > One is attached to attachment, the other to detachment. Both love. > > But love, is neither. > > ~*~ there is only one relationship existing...... the one of the dream-bubble....to the real Self..... if you would be....this your " love " ..... then there would be no " others " ....which are in relationship to each..... your attachment to this your " love " ......is like the attachment to the dream you had last night..... wake up Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > <pliantheart@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines > things.....is > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in > > time > > > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > if that is what seems to you... then you have got it wrong. > > > > > > I in no way emphasize thought. > > > > > > I said that thinking happens, and that there is thinking > > > that is not characterized by thought. > > > > > > So absurd! You say I am emphasizing thought and I didn't > > > even use the word " thought " ! > > > > > > What do you do for a living? Do you have to work? > > > Do you ever have to solve problems? > > > Solving problems involves thinking by definition. > > > > > > But that thinking does not need to entail " inner dialog " > > > or " thought chains " . The solving of a problem can be > > > in effect " dreamed " . It is a deep, mysterious process. > > > But it is still rightfully called " thinking " ... even if > > > it is very different from what people ordinarily call > > > thinking. > > > > > > As I said, solving problems entails thinking. > > > What if you lose your car keys? How do you find them? > > > Do you ever solve any " problems " ... ? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > I never solve any " problems " ... > > ...iietsa > > > > So explain that a little more. > Do you work for a living? > What do you do all day? > If you just sit staring at the wall, > walking in nature etc. then lovely, > and sure, no problem solving. > > Do you drive? > You never answered my question as to > what you do if you lose your car keys. > > What if something you regularly use stops working > correctly? > Do you just throw it away and get a new one? > Or do you try to figure our what is wrong with it? > > Bill Hey.....now I've got it.....this is the answer to: " whats the purpose in fighting with words " ..........I just knew if this exchange kept up, all would become 'clear'......Mu! .........bob p.s.I've wondered what some people do all day on these lists myself. Good Question. A+ for thoughtful inquiry here. (bn) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thinking that you are not the one that imagines things.....is > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Thinking that separation does not exist......brings it to > > > existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking is......itself separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > (Era......this one's for you) > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > I never think > > > ...iietsa > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > but thinking happens... > > > > > > thinking is not a " doing " by a somebody... > > > > > > but if the car keys get lost there is > > > some thinking going on to find them. > > > > > > " inner dialog " and thinking are not the same. > > > > > > there can be an end to " inner dialog " ... > > > > > > but there is still thinking... > > > > > > there is still problem solving... > > > > > > thinking can be silent, " in the dark " as it were... > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > it seems that you are emphasizing thought and its movement in time > > created by itself...I emphasize no thing... > > ...iietsa > > > > Yes, the difference between freedom and bondage, if there is such a > thing, is in the EMPHASIS. This is what all this is all about, > emphasis. But Bill can Also be " right, " since there is also such a > thing as over emphasis. > > Still, iietsa's poetry, and it is absolutely poetry, is beautiful. > > Bill's prose, is too. But whereas prose puts the accent there, poetry > puts it here. > > ~*~ > Sky > (is not bob) > The most beautiful poem in the world is " YOU " a work of art, shades of humanity, hues of God, tints and glints of .....a heart that carries the world inside, .....a mind that floats in the deepest space of all stars, and if we should meet, one poem to another, how shall we speak??? what shall we say? what would need to be said? but a tear from the grateful dead. Anna :-) (actually a smile and hug would do fine.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.