Guest guest Report post Posted November 17, 2003 If the trace, arche-phenomenon of " memory, " which must be thought before the opposition of nature and culture, animality and humanity, etc., belongs to the very movement of signification, then signification is a priori written, whether inscribed or not, in one form or another, in a " sensible " and " spatial " element that is called " exterior. " Arche-writing, at first the possibility of the spoken word, then of the " graphie " in the narrow sense, the birthplace of " usurpation, " denounced from Plato to Saussure, this trace is the opening of the first exteriority in general, the enigmatic relationship of the living to its other and of an inside to an outside: spacing. The outside, " spatial " and " objective " exteriority which we believe we know as the most familiar thing in the world, as familiarity itself, would not appear without the grammé, without difference as temporalisation, without the non-presence of the other inscribed within the sense of the present, without the relationship with death as the concrete structure of the living present. Metaphor would be forbidden. The presence-absence of the trace, which one should not even call its ambiguity but rather its play, carries in itself the problems of the letter and the spirit, of body and soul, and of all the problems whose primary affinity I have recalled. All dualisms, all theories of the immortality of the soul or of the spirit, as well as all monisms, spiritualist or materialist, dialectical or vulgar, are the unique theme of a metaphysics whose entire history was compelled to strive toward the reduction of the trace. [from Chapter Two, Of Grammatology, 1967] Derrida Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites