realist Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 Let's Get Small Just how small is a microbe? If you happen to read a report written by a microbiologist, you might learn that a poliovirus is 30 nanometers in diameter and that an E. coli cell is 3 micrometers long. But does that mean anything to you? Scientists use these measurement terms because microbes are so small, they cannot be measured using the more familiar inches or millimeters. (A micrometer is a thousand times smaller than a millimeter and a nanometer is one million times smaller than a millimeter.) If you read What is a Microbe, you came across an illustration of microbial size that compared different microbes to common features of a baseball park. Such comparisons can help you put into perspective how small microbes are compared to, say, a human cell using objects whose size is more familiar to you. That’s what this activity is all about. You’ll compare the sizes of different microbes to the size of a very familiar item—a human hair. Note: This activity will take about 1 hour. You’ll Need: meter stick or ruler magnifying glass access to an empty parking lot, carport, patio, gymnasium, field or other large, open space. depending on the type of space you have, you’ll need either a box of sidewalk chalk (parking lot or patio), colored string (field or other grassy area), or colored tape (gymnasium) a hair pulled from your head or taken from your brush or comb Print-out of Microbe Reference Chart Note: If you do this activity in a parking lot, choose a day when that lot is not being used. You should definitely have at least one friend with you if not a parent or other adult. At least one person should keep a lookout for approaching cars at all times. Just be careful! What To Do Kids: 1. Examine your single hair both with and without the magnifying glass. Note how thin it is if you hold it at one end and look down at the tip. Depending on how thick your hair is, you may just barely be able to see it without the magnifying glass. The average human hair is 0.1 millimeters wide, or one-tenth of one millimeter wide. That’s pretty tiny. 2. In your open space, use your meter stick to measure out an area that is 10 meters long. Mark off this 10-meter area with your chalk, string or tape, whatever works best for your chosen space. This 10-meter area will represent the width of your hair, that tiny width that you were barely able to see without a magnifying glass. 3. Choose one of the microbes from the first column of the Microbe Reference Chart. Think about how its size might compare to the width of your hair. Using the model size listed in column 4 of the Chart and your meter stick to measure, draw a picture of this microbe (or mark off its length and width with string or tape) somewhere beside the 10-meter area you already marked off. Once again, hold up your hair and see how tiny its width is and compare the actual size of the hair with the actual size (column 2) of the microbe. 4. Repeat step 3 with additional microbes listed in the Reference Chart. You can do as many as you like. Use different colored chalk, tape or string for each microbe so you can remember which markings refer to which microbe. 5. When you’re finished drawing as many microbes as you’d like, compare the sizes and shapes of the microbes you've drawn. You have just created a reference model for microbial size. 6. Clean up your remaining pieces of chalk and remove tape or string when you’re done. Questions Why do scientists need to use models? Why can’t they just look under a microscope to see what they need to see? Answer Which kind of microbe is the smallest, a virus, bacterium or protozoan? Which is the biggest? Answer According to the Reference Chart, an E. coli bacterium is 2 micrometers long. Assuming that it's 1.25 micrometers wide, could you determine how many E. coli could fit on the tip of one of your hairs? Answer This experiment is based on an activity developed by the National Association of Biology Teachers.<!-- InstanceEndEditable --> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulapavana Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 it simply means that it is infinitely small. it is humbling to look at a tiny ant and think that it is powered up by a soul just like us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srikanthdk71 Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 What has this got to do with a spiritual forum? If you start understanding the Gita in the gross form, there will be no difference between the you and the interpreters of Bible. What is your goal? Achieve it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bija Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 16) Of the changeable, such as the body, there is no everlasting existence; of the everlastingsoul, there is no transformation or destruction. Seers of the truth have thus distinguished and analyzed the nature of both eternal reality and temporary illusion. 17) Know that the soul who pervades the entire body is imperishable. He is unchangeable and everlasting, and no one can destroy him. 18) Only these physical bodies of the eternal, indestructible, and immeasurable soul are subject to destruction. Therefore, fight, O Bharata, and do not give up your natural religious principles. 19) Those who think that the living being is a slayer, and those who think that he is slain, are both ignorant of the true nature of the soul - the soul neither slays nor is slain. 20) The soul is never born and he never dies, nor does he repeatedly come into being and undergo expansion, because he is unborn and eternal. He is inexhaustible ever-youthful yet ancient. Although the body is subject to birth and death, the soul is never destroyed. 21) O Partha, how can a person who knows the soul to be constant, indestructible, birthless, and inexhaustible, kill anyone or cause anyone to be killed? 22) As a person accepts new dress, rejecting that which is old and worn, so also the soul continues to accept a new body, giving up the old and useless one. 23) Weapons cannot pierce the soul, and fire cannot burn him. He can neither be moistened with water, nor dried by the air. 24-25) The soul is indivisible and cannot be burned, moistened, or dried up. He is everlasting, constant, unchangeable, and ever-existent. Nothing can obstruct his passage. This soul is imperceptible, inconceivable, and unaffected by the sixfold mutations (birth, existence, growth, maturity, diminution, and destruction). Therefore, knowing the soul in this way, you can no longer lament. 26-27) And, O best of warriors, even if you think that the soul is perpetually subject to birth and death, you still have no reason to lament. For one who is born, death is certain, and for one who dies, he must be reborn to undergo the reactions of his past actions. Therefore, you should not lament over the inevitable. 28) O Bharata, when all living entities are unmanifest before birth, manifest between birth and death, and again unmanifest at death, why lament for them? (This conclusion is not corroborated by saintly authorities; but if it is accepted for the sake of argument, your duty is still to fight to uphold your natural religious principles.) 29) Some see the soul as astonishing, some describe him as astonishing, some hear of him as astonishing, while others, even after hearing about him, cannot understand him at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.