Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana

[Guest guest]

Hi there,

 

I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

 

I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone god soul out

there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

 

I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail me a

dumawathi sadhana.

 

I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more information of

the godness,

]

Thanks

[Guest guest]

Try ISSPLIST .

 

 

-

"Sharav Subramaniam" <sharavs >

<>

Monday, September 04, 2006 11:50 PM

Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana

 

 

> Hi there,

[Guest guest]

Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess.Can you let me know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs > wrote:

Hi there,

 

I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

 

I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone god soul out

there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

 

I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail me a

dumawathi sadhana.

 

I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more information of

the godness,

]

Thanks

[Guest guest]

On 9/5/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower

> state.

 

 

Now is that right?

 

May I suggest please dont refer to one form of devi lower then other one.Forget any forms of devi, heck all the women around you and me, are same as the Devi herself. I wouldnt even consider them any lower then the Goddess.So I wonder what made you make this comment. You may refer to 'Durga Shapshati" for this confirmation.

 

BTW I am assuming that since you are making this comment you would be very well versed in all the Sadhans, Knowledge of Dhoomavathi. But somehow it feels like you are not. Again I wonder what the truth is...

 

one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is

> the supreme most Goddess.

 

 

Its is comment like these, "Supreme most Goddess" makes me stop and think again. Perhaps any other sperlative adjective you might want to add.. You may add couple of them more, but still all the forms are the same. There is no one better then the other. There is no one wose then the other. there is no good and no bad. Its all one... "The Devi" and nothing else.

 

May I again say what DB has said one lot of the emails.. "Devi is one. She manifests in many forms", so that people like myself could understand it.

 

Regards

Har Har Mahadev.

[Guest guest]

The lower and higher are only in your mind.

 

-

sangar narayanan

Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:34 PM

Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana

 

 

Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess.Can you let me know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

 

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs > wrote:

Hi there,

 

I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

 

I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone god soul out

there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

 

I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail me a

dumawathi sadhana.

 

I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more information of

the godness,

]

Thanks

[Guest guest]

Pranam. I agree. Please refrain. When we understand that Devi is one but Her rupams are many, we will realise that to say one rupam is higher or better than another is a fallacious statement.

Thank you.

With Love

Shankaree

 

Dhirendra Pal Singh <dpal.singh > wrote:

On 9/5/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower

> state.

 

Now is that right?

 

May I suggest please dont refer to one form of devi lower then other one.Forget any forms of devi, heck all the women around you and me, are same as the Devi herself. I wouldnt even consider them any lower then the Goddess.So I wonder what made you make this comment. You may refer to 'Durga Shapshati" for this confirmation.

 

BTW I am assuming that since you are making this comment you would be very well versed in all the Sadhans, Knowledge of Dhoomavathi. But somehow it feels like you are not. Again I wonder what the truth is...

 

one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is

> the supreme most Goddess.

 

Its is comment like these, "Supreme most Goddess" makes me stop and think again. Perhaps any other sperlative adjective you might want to add.. You may add couple of them more, but still all the forms are the same. There is no one better then the other. There is no one wose then the other. there is no good and no bad. Its all one... "The Devi" and nothing else.

 

May I again say what DB has said one lot of the emails.. "Devi is one. She manifests in many forms", so that people like myself could understand it.

 

Regards

Har Har Mahadev.

 

 

 

 

 

Let my every word be a prayer to Thee,

Every movement of my hands a ritual gesture to Thee,

Every step I take a circumambulation of Thy image,

Every morsel I eat a rite of sacrifice to Thee,

Every time I lay down a prostration at Thy feet;

Every act of personal pleasure and all else that I do,

Let it all be a form of worshiping Thee."

 

>From Verse 27 of Shri Aadi Shankara's Saundaryalahari

 

 

 

Try the all-new Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal

[Guest guest]

Dear Brother/Sister,

I do not want to drag on this issue unnecessarily. Whether one accepts or not the fact remains that Raja Rajeswari is the only supreme mother. All other dieties are state of various types of divine energy, bestowed by Her to do various duties as we have a CM\PM and others in reality.

Only people who have had the upasana know the real truth of this. It is Ok for logic that all rupams are that of the Divine Mother, then why then so many rupams to confuse people. It is better to understand the ideal behind the idol rather than confusing ourselves and worship Her.

Let no one mistake me for this comment as it is purely my personal opinion.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANRAYANAN

 

Shankaree Ramatas <shankaree > wrote:

Pranam. I agree. Please refrain. When we understand that Devi is one but Her rupams are many, we will realise that to say one rupam is higher or better than another is a fallacious statement.

 

Thank you.

 

With Love

 

Shankaree

[Guest guest]

Dear Brother,

Are you refering to the rupam or the divine energy. Are you able to see the ideal behind the idol worship. We make it convenient to make so many forms, as one may think,and when we start worshipping that form we consider it the supreme most, forgetting the fact that the ideal behind is totally that of energy, which is the supreme energy of the Divine Mother. Whether I am a learned person or not, but let me tell you that one get the essense on what he meditates. If you meditate on the sea you get the result "salt". Therefore if one were to meditate on the supreme Mother instead of mundane worship, then the results will certainly be different.

 

Finally the opinion is my personal opinion and I am not putting it forcebly into any ones mind to accept. It is for them to realise the truth through sadhana.

God bless us all.

Yours sincerely,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Dhirendra Pal Singh <dpal.singh > wrote:

On 9/5/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower

> state.

 

Now is that right?

 

May I suggest please dont refer to one form of devi lower then other one.Forget any forms of devi, heck all the women around you and me, are same as the Devi herself. I wouldnt even consider them any lower then the Goddess.So I wonder what made you make this comment. You may refer to 'Durga Shapshati" for this confirmation.

 

BTW I am assuming that since you are making this comment you would be very well versed in all the Sadhans, Knowledge of Dhoomavathi. But somehow it feels like you are not. Again I wonder what the truth is...

 

one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is

> the supreme most Goddess.

 

Its is comment like these, "Supreme most Goddess" makes me stop and think again. Perhaps any other sperlative adjective you might want to add.. You may add couple of them more, but still all the forms are the same. There is no one better then the other. There is no one wose then the other. there is no good and no bad. Its all one... "The Devi" and nothing else.

 

May I again say what DB has said one lot of the emails.. "Devi is one. She manifests in many forms", so that people like myself could understand it.

 

Regards

Har Har Mahadev.

[Guest guest]

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Dear Brother/Sister,

>

> I do not want to drag on this issue unnecessarily.

 

 

I think we should if the situation warrants it. If you are in your

own group you can say anything you want and nobody will question

you. But you are in a Shakta group which consist of sadhika/sadhaka

from various path. You coming here saying : my DEVI is more superior

than the others, to me that is very rude, arrogant and unbecoming

especially from a sadhaka who like to protray himself to

be "advance", giving others abt the correct way of doing sadhana

etc. I personally will question your action as long as you are in

here. I'm tempted to edit your message but I choose not to as I

want everybody to see you as what you are.

 

Now my logic says this : you continue propogate only Raja Rajeshwari

because you only know her and easy for you to promote products that

you can sell associate with her. Its more of a marketing strategy.

Its the same like the many salesman : their product is better and

more superior than the others.

 

 

"Whether one accepts or not the fact remains that Raja Rajeswari is

the only supreme mother. All other dieties are state of various

types of divine energy, bestowed by Her to do various duties as we

have a CM\PM and others in reality. Only people who have had the

upasana know the real truth of this. It is Ok for logic that all

rupams are that of the Divine Mother, then why then so many rupams

to confuse people. It is better to understand the ideal behind the

idol rather than confusing ourselves and worship Her.""

 

 

I think the problem lies in this statement. These are the facts as

understood by the Raja Rajeswari devotees like yourself, but

personally I think not many accept this fact. I had a reunion with

old friends sometime back for our annual pooja for Shri Maha

Mariamman. I asked an elderly lady abt Periachi Amman. And her

association with all the other Devis. Her fact is Periachi Amman is

the supreme deity, and followed by the others. For a Kali devotee,

the fact is Kali is supreme and Lalitha is second, followed by Durga

etc.

 

 

 

> Let no one mistake me for this comment as it is purely my

personal opinion.

 

Good for you to make this statement. At least now we understand your

state of mind and your perception of people and things around you.

 

 

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANRAYANAN

[Guest guest]

This is so silly it is not even worthy of a response.

 

-

sangar narayanan

Thursday, September 07, 2006 6:21 PM

Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana

 

 

Dear Brother/Sister,

 

I do not want to drag on this issue unnecessarily. Whether one accepts or not the fact remains that Raja Rajeswari is the only supreme mother. All other dieties are state of various types of divine energy, bestowed by Her to do various duties as we have a CM\PM and others in reality.

Only people who have had the upasana know the real truth of this. It is Ok for logic that all rupams are that of the Divine Mother, then why then so many rupams to confuse people. It is better to understand the ideal behind the idol rather than confusing ourselves and worship Her.

Let no one mistake me for this comment as it is purely my personal opinion.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANRAYANAN

 

Shankaree Ramatas <shankaree > wrote:

Pranam. I agree. Please refrain. When we understand that Devi is one but Her rupams are many, we will realise that to say one rupam is higher or better than another is a fallacious statement.

 

Thank you.

 

With Love

 

Shankaree

[Guest guest]

On 9/7/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Dear Brother,

>

> Are you refering to the rupam or the divine energy.

 

 

Being an Engineer by professoin I am not good with play of words. If you

didnt get what I was sayig then there is no point in explaining again.

While if you did get, then i dont need to anyhow.

 

Are you able to see the ideal behind the idol worship.

 

 

Depends on my mothers wish. I have no idea of what I see or what I want to

see. As a matter of fact, for me "Seeing" is a very complicated term. so

well I have no idea.

 

We make it convenient to make so many forms, as one may think,and when we

> start worshipping that form we consider it the supreme most, forgetting the

> fact that the ideal behind is totally that of energy, which is the supreme

> energy of the Divine Mother. Whether I am a learned person or not,

 

 

No need to answer it. I have my answer..

 

but let me tell you that one get the essense on what he meditates. If you

> meditate on the sea you get the result "salt". Therefore if one were to

> meditate on the supreme Mother instead of mundane worship, then the results

> will certainly be different.

 

 

I think at this point you are either too ignorant or too arrogant to

understand. While you may thing the same about it.. Only time and Mother's

grace shall tell who is correct.

 

Finally the opinion is my personal opinion and I am not putting it forcebly

> into any ones mind to accept. It is for them to realise the truth through

> sadhana.

 

 

So glad, we are in sync on at least this one point.

 

Har Har Mahadev.

[Guest guest]

Dear Aatthi,

 

Namaskar,

After very long time some body is asking about the bhagwati DHUMAWATI.I know

little bit about the BHAGWATI AND WANT TO DO SADHANA BUT NO BODY IS

AVAILABLE ,WHO CAN INITIATE .But i have a book about bhagwati DHUMAWATI

SADHANA ,in which every thing is mentioned regarding puja and avaran puja

also.

 

This is the only authentic book ,and u can avail the photo copy of the same

from me and yr all the queries will be satisfied.In MP there is apeeth of

baglamukhi and dhumawati, .No married woman can do darshan of bhgwati

dhumawati ,so that married people ar not doing this sadhana.IT IS AVERY

"UGRA' SADHANA.

I HAVE ABOOK IN HINDI AND SANSKRIT ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY BOOK AVAILABLE IN

INDIA.

THANKS ,

 

PRADEEP SHARMA, GM, RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,

DURGA CHAK ,HALDIA (W.B.) 721602

 

CELL 919832189009

913224 253594(O), 913224 266981®

 

 

On 9/5/06, Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs > wrote:

>

> Hi there,

>

> I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

>

> I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone god soul

> out

> there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

>

> I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail me a

> dumawathi sadhana.

>

> I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more information of

> the godness,

> ]

> Thanks

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Divine Brother,

Can you send a photo copy of the book you mention if possible, so that it can be added to my divine library and made available to all practioners of sri vidhya. My address is:

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN - SATHYANANDHANATHA

62/3,28th cross, Indiranagar, adyar, chennai-600020, Tamilnadu, India.

If you will kindly let me know I shall remit the costs.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

srividyanand nath sricharyanand nath <srividyanand > wrote:

Dear Aatthi,

 

Namaskar,

After very long time some body is asking about the bhagwati DHUMAWATI.I know

little bit about the BHAGWATI AND WANT TO DO SADHANA BUT NO BODY IS

AVAILABLE ,WHO CAN INITIATE .But i have a book about bhagwati DHUMAWATI

SADHANA ,in which every thing is mentioned regarding puja and avaran puja

also.

 

This is the only authentic book ,and u can avail the photo copy of the same

from me and yr all the queries will be satisfied.In MP there is apeeth of

baglamukhi and dhumawati, .No married woman can do darshan of bhgwati

dhumawati ,so that married people ar not doing this sadhana.IT IS AVERY

"UGRA' SADHANA.

I HAVE ABOOK IN HINDI AND SANSKRIT ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY BOOK AVAILABLE IN

INDIA.

THANKS ,

 

PRADEEP SHARMA, GM, RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,

DURGA CHAK ,HALDIA (W.B.) 721602

 

CELL 919832189009

913224 253594(O), 913224 266981®

 

On 9/5/06, Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs > wrote:

>

> Hi there,

>

> I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

>

> I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone god soul

> out

> there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

>

> I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail me a

> dumawathi sadhana.

>

> I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more information of

> the godness,

> ]

> Thanks

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dearest Divine,

I do not want to answer as I feel that you are not prepared to accept reality. Thanks a lot. let it be that I am ignorant and nothing is lost by your comments.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Dhirendra Pal Singh <dpal.singh > wrote:

On 9/7/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Dear Brother,

>

> Are you refering to the rupam or the divine energy.

 

Being an Engineer by professoin I am not good with play of words. If you

didnt get what I was sayig then there is no point in explaining again.

While if you did get, then i dont need to anyhow.

 

Are you able to see the ideal behind the idol worship.

 

Depends on my mothers wish. I have no idea of what I see or what I want to

see. As a matter of fact, for me "Seeing" is a very complicated term. so

well I have no idea.

 

We make it convenient to make so many forms, as one may think,and when we

> start worshipping that form we consider it the supreme most, forgetting the

> fact that the ideal behind is totally that of energy, which is the supreme

> energy of the Divine Mother. Whether I am a learned person or not,

 

No need to answer it. I have my answer..

 

but let me tell you that one get the essense on what he meditates. If you

> meditate on the sea you get the result "salt". Therefore if one were to

> meditate on the supreme Mother instead of mundane worship, then the results

> will certainly be different.

 

I think at this point you are either too ignorant or too arrogant to

understand. While you may thing the same about it.. Only time and Mother's

grace shall tell who is correct.

 

Finally the opinion is my personal opinion and I am not putting it forcebly

> into any ones mind to accept. It is for them to realise the truth through

> sadhana.

 

So glad, we are in sync on at least this one point.

 

Har Har Mahadev.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

[Guest guest]

Please by so kind to allow one humble question:

If you consider Dhoomavati a "low power" for what purpose do you and

your fellow upasakas need the Dhoomavati Sadhana , if you think it

only gives low results?

 

Is it part of your understanding of srividya upasana to do practices

for low results occassionaly while denying others the right to ask

questions about nishkamya sadhana of Dhoomavati?

 

 

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Dear Divine Brother,

>

> Can you send a photo copy of the book you mention if possible, so

that it can be added to my divine library and made available to all

practioners of sri vidhya. My address is:

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN - SATHYANANDHANATHA

> 62/3,28th cross, Indiranagar, adyar, chennai-600020, Tamilnadu,

India.

> If you will kindly let me know I shall remit the costs.

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

>

> srividyanand nath sricharyanand nath <srividyanand wrote:

> Dear Aatthi,

>

> Namaskar,

> After very long time some body is asking about the bhagwati

DHUMAWATI.I know

> little bit about the BHAGWATI AND WANT TO DO SADHANA BUT NO BODY IS

> AVAILABLE ,WHO CAN INITIATE .But i have a book about bhagwati

DHUMAWATI

> SADHANA ,in which every thing is mentioned regarding puja and

avaran puja

> also.

>

> This is the only authentic book ,and u can avail the photo copy of

the same

> from me and yr all the queries will be satisfied.In MP there is

apeeth of

> baglamukhi and dhumawati, .No married woman can do darshan of

bhgwati

> dhumawati ,so that married people ar not doing this sadhana.IT IS

AVERY

> "UGRA' SADHANA.

> I HAVE ABOOK IN HINDI AND SANSKRIT ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY BOOK

AVAILABLE IN

> INDIA.

> THANKS ,

>

> PRADEEP SHARMA, GM, RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,

> DURGA CHAK ,HALDIA (W.B.) 721602

>

> CELL 919832189009

> 913224 253594(O), 913224 266981®

>

> On 9/5/06, Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs wrote:

> >

> > Hi there,

> >

> > I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

> >

> > I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone

god soul

> > out

> > there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

> >

> > I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail

me a

> > dumawathi sadhana.

> >

> > I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more

information of

> > the godness,

> > ]

> > Thanks

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Brother,

It is my opinion (personal) that one should always try to atain the highest goal - mergence with the ultimate reality - I do not worship Dhoomavathi and i only worship Sri lalitha maha tripurasundari, in which everything is merged. The highest form of worship contains the lowest form also and therefore it is not necessary that one should go step by step. If by the grace of the Divine Mother one gets a true guru who transmits the energy of the Divine Mother intoto, he can achieve the goal in no time.

There is no question of denying others to ask any question they like andwe are all here to share and care. When you know the scorpion will sting, we can tell others to be careful. Similarly worship of such Devatas are full of risk and that is all I can say. It does not mean dasa maha vidhya is not to be practiced.

I do not want to prolong this subject on and on and it is one's experience and sadhana that would take him to the highest level.

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha > wrote:

Please by so kind to allow one humble question:

If you consider Dhoomavati a "low power" for what purpose do you and

your fellow upasakas need the Dhoomavati Sadhana , if you think it

only gives low results?

 

Is it part of your understanding of srividya upasana to do practices

for low results occassionaly while denying others the right to ask

questions about nishkamya sadhana of Dhoomavati?

 

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Dear Divine Brother,

>

> Can you send a photo copy of the book you mention if possible, so

that it can be added to my divine library and made available to all

practioners of sri vidhya. My address is:

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN - SATHYANANDHANATHA

> 62/3,28th cross, Indiranagar, adyar, chennai-600020, Tamilnadu,

India.

> If you will kindly let me know I shall remit the costs.

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

>

> srividyanand nath sricharyanand nath <srividyanand wrote:

> Dear Aatthi,

>

> Namaskar,

> After very long time some body is asking about the bhagwati

DHUMAWATI.I know

> little bit about the BHAGWATI AND WANT TO DO SADHANA BUT NO BODY IS

> AVAILABLE ,WHO CAN INITIATE .But i have a book about bhagwati

DHUMAWATI

> SADHANA ,in which every thing is mentioned regarding puja and

avaran puja

> also.

>

> This is the only authentic book ,and u can avail the photo copy of

the same

> from me and yr all the queries will be satisfied.In MP there is

apeeth of

> baglamukhi and dhumawati, .No married woman can do darshan of

bhgwati

> dhumawati ,so that married people ar not doing this sadhana.IT IS

AVERY

> "UGRA' SADHANA.

> I HAVE ABOOK IN HINDI AND SANSKRIT ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY BOOK

AVAILABLE IN

> INDIA.

> THANKS ,

>

> PRADEEP SHARMA, GM, RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD,

> DURGA CHAK ,HALDIA (W.B.) 721602

>

> CELL 919832189009

> 913224 253594(O), 913224 266981®

>

> On 9/5/06, Sharav Subramaniam <sharavs wrote:

> >

> > Hi there,

> >

> > I am aathi i am from malaysia and i am into sadhana.

> >

> > I would like to have godness domawathi bleesing, i hope anyone

god soul

> > out

> > there can teach me about the sadhana to reach my goals.

> >

> > I hope to get more info on dumawati sadha, if can can u pls mail

me a

> > dumawathi sadhana.

> >

> > I am a bit well verse in maha vidya godness but i need more

information of

> > the godness,

> > ]

> > Thanks

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

No form is lower or higher. But the main problem I see is that ppl think they can get this and that from these sadhanas. Let me clarify that no Mantra will yield material fruits easily. Even when it does, "be careful what you pray for; because u may get it". There are things we are entitled to and things that should not be wrested from the universe for i may prove too costly. Hence the note of caution.

 

 

Dhirendra Pal Singh <dpal.singh > wrote: On 9/5/06, sangar narayanan <mackro1932 > wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a lower

> state.

 

Now is that right?

 

May I suggest please dont refer to one form of devi lower then other one.Forget any forms of devi, heck all the women around you and me, are same as the Devi herself. I wouldnt even consider them any lower then the Goddess.So I wonder what made you make this comment. You may refer to 'Durga Shapshati" for this confirmation.

 

BTW I am assuming that since you are making this comment you would be very well versed in all the Sadhans, Knowledge of Dhoomavathi. But somehow it feels like you are not. Again I wonder what the truth is...

 

one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of Tripurasundari, which is

> the supreme most Goddess.

 

Its is comment like these, "Supreme most Goddess" makes me stop and think again. Perhaps any other sperlative adjective you might want to add.. You may add couple of them more, but still all the forms are the same. There is no one better then the other. There is no one wose then the other. there is no good and no bad. Its all one... "The Devi" and nothing else.

 

May I again say what DB has said one lot of the emails.. "Devi is one. She manifests in many forms", so that people like myself could understand it.

 

Regards

Har Har Mahadev.

 

 

 

 

 

Get your email and more, right on the new .com