Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Prakki bhai, dont get angry. This is a civilised discussion group. If you cant follow the rules, then you should keep quite. It is not your right to attack other people who dont agree with your extremely bigoted and narrow views. After all we tolerate all the crap you write about how the Christians/Muslims are right, and how Gita is wrong, there is no rebirth. You say if I had talked about Krishna this way people would have crushed me. 1st, we dont live in Saudi Arabia. 2nd, after all the bullshit you write where Gita becomes inferior to the Bible, if people didnt crush you, they sure arent crushing me. BTW I went to your Gurus website, where he had copy pasted his image on Jesus/ Mohammed/ Krishnas face. But that doesnt make him God, nor does it make you Divine. Now I see where you get your views from. But it takes more than pasting your photo on Krishnas photo to make you Krishna, any more than it makes me Shahrukh Khan. PS- I am also an incarnation of Shiva, as are all the 6 billion people of Earth(but they just dont know it). And I dont need to paste my photo on Shivjis body to prove this. I just KNOW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 my dear friend Shanracer Absolutely, I am not angry with you. Momentarily, i was little bit annoyed to see your writing on Shankara. They are completely wrong. Shankara was a genius and one of the greatest preachers. Even His photo is in some German university also. Very few can understand His Bhashyam and mainly preached for His close disciples who only can understand. Let us not comment on such a great divine personality (Lord in human form) with our little understanding. As per Veda, 'Shivascha Narayanah' and 'Brahmascha Narayanah' and hence mean all the three are only one and the same and that one and only Parabrahman is Lord Datta. So absolutely, three are not there (like Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva) but appearing as if three are there. Hence, there is no conflict or need to show any difference. Lord Datta means God given to the world in the human form for the upliftment of humanity and hence He is the highest for the humanity. He is the only means of reaching/serving/pleasing the Lord. Lord Krishna stressed the same when He said 'Vasudevah Sarvamiti… in the Gita' and Lord Jesus told ‘I am the only way’ . Such Lord in human form is called the human incarnation. The ‘I’ refers to the human incarnation of Lord only, who comes in every generation otherwise, He becomes partial for a generation of people, place and time. The worship of such contemporary human incarnation gives the highest fruit as in the case of Hanuman (attained the post of future creator), who worshipped Lord Rama; Gopikas (attained Goloka), who worshipped Lord Krishna; the disciples of Shankara, Rama Krishna Parama Hamsa, Shirdi Sai, Jesus, Mohammed Prophet worshipped the respective human incarnation only as Lord and got the highest laurels. Worship again means not mere words and feelings but by participating in his mission through service. His mission is only to spread the divine knowledge and devotion in this world and to uplift everybody. So, a true devotee should not differentiate all these human incarnations because the same Lord Datta only appeared through all these forms. Hence, there is no quesion of giving importance to one and devaluing another. That is not correct. ..... when the same face is present in all the pictures it would give a psychological impression that the same God appeared in different forms. The face is the real identity of a person. Unfortunately, the pictures of various deities and incarnations were only the imaginary drawings of artists. But, they included different faces in these imaginary diagrams. This will give an unconscious impression that the deities and incarnations are quite different and the idea of one God does not become strong. I have super imposed My face on the faces of deities and incarnations for whom the real photos were not present. Don’t you think that a real face is better than the imaginary face? My face and the imaginary faces on the photos are constituted by five elements only and there is no difference. I did not agree to super impose My face on the face of Shri Shirdi Sai Baba, because His real photo exists. For this concept of one God, this single face helps. This single real face need not be mine only. In fact you can also super impose your face in the faces of these deities and incarnations to explain that concept. It is only just a pictorial model. I will appreciate equally for two merits. 1) The face is real and not imaginary and truth is better than false imagination. 2) The face is single and this point does not exist in the imaginary faces. At the lotus feet of Shri Datta Swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org shanracer <no_reply> wrote: Prakki bhai, dont get angry. This is a civilised discussion group. If Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 >I have super imposed My face on the faces of deities and incarnations >for whom the real photos were not present. Don't you think that a You put your own Photo on Krishna/ Jesus / Mohammeds face! That means you yourself are Lord Datta, not his follower. Wow! I am sorry your lordship, I did not agree with you. See I thought you were just a human, but clearly I failed to recognise you. > Let us not comment on such a great divine personality (Lord in human >form) with our little understanding. That story isnt my own. If you werent so busy copy pasting articles, and putting your own photo on Gods face, you would have known that Shankar wrote Saundariya Lahiri, clearly a Shaktic/Tantric text. The story I told was about how he came to write about it- his whole life he was preaching Advait Vedant. Ok, Prakki, we have a deal. You stop preaching the Bible/Koran in this group and stop claiming you are God. I will stop writing about Shankaracharya. Fair Deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Aree sanracer bhai, kahe ko bahas karte ho bhaiyya! Surya gives such original commentary on the Gita. Can you Biblise the Gita? Can you show that Kuran is similar to Puran? He can! Now that we know he is God, we have to show him extra repsect, or he might burn us with his 3rd eye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 my dear friend shanracer Agreed. It was my mistake. Actually I have put ....... while pasting the clarification about phots. I meant that part is in the very words of swamiji only. so, that is not my claim. Infact, that photo was swamiji's photo only. I am only His servant. I am only a human being like you. Even in dreams i will not claim/aspire Lordship. Actually same question whatever was raised by you, was already asked by a devotee to swamiji. He replied it. The same thing i pasted it. So those will be in His own words. Thank you for showing my mistake. actually i recognised my mistake immediately but by that time itself, i have clicked 'SEND'. so it slipped off. anyway, many many thanks for your great help to me. At the lotus feet of Shri Datta Swami surya http://www.universal-spirituality.org shanracer <no_reply> wrote: >I have super imposed My face on the faces of deities and incarnations >for whom the real photos were not present. Don't you think that a You put your own Photo on Krishna/ Jesus / Mohammeds face! That means you yourself are Lord Datta, not his follower. Wow! I am sorry your lordship, I did not agree with you. See I thought you were just a human, but clearly I failed to recognise you. > Let us not comment on such a great divine personality (Lord in human >form) with our little understanding. That story isnt my own. If you werent so busy copy pasting articles, and putting your own photo on Gods face, you would have known that Shankar wrote Saundariya Lahiri, clearly a Shaktic/Tantric text. The story I told was about how he came to write about it- his whole life he was preaching Advait Vedant. Ok, Prakki, we have a deal. You stop preaching the Bible/Koran in this group and stop claiming you are God. I will stop writing about Shankaracharya. Fair Deal. Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2006 Report Share Posted July 12, 2006 right pradeep, i think surya got emotional and refused to accept anything more than what he knows. but surya has been writing some good things too... we should more care for them than the ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.