----------HARSHAL, NEPTUNE, PLUTO????????

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends and guruji's,

I read many e-mails and its answers given by expert astrologers from

this group. I may be wrong but i found that planets like

HARSHAL,NEPTUNE and PLUTO are not considered. Is it becaus of name of

group that only 9 planets are considered??? Please explain as i am in

learning.

Thank you

 

 

Regards,

NIRUPAM

[Guest guest]

Dear Nirupam,

Astrology is a holistic subject, which takes Sign-House-Planet as its

basic constructs. Here the planet changes form a reality to a concept,

aimed at its usefulness. Even if there was only 2 (Sun & Moon only)

astrology would have been there. The Rishi's selected the 5 then known

planets along with Sun, Moon, and the Nodal points Ra and Ke to create

this system, which is a concept based holistic system, which could be

used to have an understanding of the past-present-future. We are trying

to understand and use that ancient system created by them, (which is

currently in an almost demolished state), rather than trying to create

a new system. Why? Only a person with holistic brain (or say meditative

brain) can understand the world, which in itself is holistic. i.e. Only

seers can create a trustworthy system to know past-present-future, and

we are not of the grade of that great Rishis who created this system.

Due to this reason we give importance to the original system, rather

than use/trying_to_use the new planets and the like. If you look around

you will notice that people with out even an understanding about the

holistic and logical foundations of Astrology (in short the basics of

astrology) is trying to use the new planets and trying to project them

selves as the Seers of the new generation.

Get a good understanding of the theoretical foundation of astrology.

Then this doubt will naturally vanish in no time.

Do you find the above statements difficult to digest? I am busy now

and don't have the time to explain in detail. Please read the article,

named 'Base of Astrology' in the 'Kerala,India' folder in the files

section of the group. That may help you to understand the above

statements made by me.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

 

vedic astrology, "nirupam22" <nirupam22

wrote:

>

> Dear Friends and guruji's,

> I read many e-mails and its answers given by expert astrologers from

> this group. I may be wrong but i found that planets like

> HARSHAL,NEPTUNE and PLUTO are not considered. Is it becaus of name of

> group that only 9 planets are considered??? Please explain as i am in

> learning.

> Thank you

>

>

> Regards,

> NIRUPAM

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadhji,

Thank you for nice explanation.

I raised this question becoz many new books in market talk lot

about these planets. As you are experienced person and has seen many

charts what is your experience or you dont consider them at all???

People who consider these planets might be right,but how do we

come to know about the reality? Or neglecting these planets really

doesn't make any difference?

Thank You.

 

REGARDS,

NIRUPAM.

vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid

wrote:

>

> Dear Nirupam,

> Astrology is a holistic subject, which takes Sign-House-Planet as

its

> basic constructs. Here the planet changes form a reality to a

concept,

> aimed at its usefulness. Even if there was only 2 (Sun & Moon only)

> astrology would have been there. The Rishi's selected the 5 then

known

> planets along with Sun, Moon, and the Nodal points Ra and Ke to

create

> this system, which is a concept based holistic system, which could

be

> used to have an understanding of the past-present-future. We are

trying

> to understand and use that ancient system created by them, (which

is

> currently in an almost demolished state), rather than trying to

create

> a new system. Why? Only a person with holistic brain (or say

meditative

> brain) can understand the world, which in itself is holistic. i.e.

Only

> seers can create a trustworthy system to know past-present-future,

and

> we are not of the grade of that great Rishis who created this

system.

> Due to this reason we give importance to the original system,

rather

> than use/trying_to_use the new planets and the like. If you look

around

> you will notice that people with out even an understanding about

the

> holistic and logical foundations of Astrology (in short the basics

of

> astrology) is trying to use the new planets and trying to project

them

> selves as the Seers of the new generation.

> Get a good understanding of the theoretical foundation of

astrology.

> Then this doubt will naturally vanish in no time.

> Do you find the above statements difficult to digest? I am busy

now

> and don't have the time to explain in detail. Please read the

article,

> named 'Base of Astrology' in the 'Kerala,India' folder in the files

> section of the group. That may help you to understand the above

> statements made by me.

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

>

> vedic astrology, "nirupam22" <nirupam22@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Friends and guruji's,

> > I read many e-mails and its answers given by expert astrologers

from

> > this group. I may be wrong but i found that planets like

> > HARSHAL,NEPTUNE and PLUTO are not considered. Is it becaus of

name of

> > group that only 9 planets are considered??? Please explain as i

am in

> > learning.

> > Thank you

> >

> >

> > Regards,

> > NIRUPAM

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Nirupam ji,

My answer is there in the previous mail itself. If not clear I

will, change a sentance and re-state it.

I said:

> We are trying to understand and use that ancient system created

> by them, (which is currently in an almost demolished state),

> rather than trying to create a new system.

You can read it as:

> I am trying to understand and use that ancient system created

> by Rishis, (which is currently in an almost demolished state),

> rather than trying to create a new system.

Is that clear?

You said:

> People who consider these planets might be right.

May be or may not be. Reason stated in previous mail.

Agin in your words:

> neglecting these planets really

> doesn't make any difference?

Yap. you are right. But that is my openion and many others may

have a different openion.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology, "nirupam22" <nirupam22

wrote:

>

> Dear Sreenadhji,

> Thank you for nice explanation.

> I raised this question becoz many new books in market talk lot

> about these planets. As you are experienced person and has seen many

> charts what is your experience or you dont consider them at all???

> People who consider these planets might be right,but how do we

> come to know about the reality? Or neglecting these planets really

> doesn't make any difference?

> Thank You.

>

> REGARDS,

> NIRUPAM.

> vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Nirupam,

> > Astrology is a holistic subject, which takes Sign-House-Planet as

> its

> > basic constructs. Here the planet changes form a reality to a

> concept,

> > aimed at its usefulness. Even if there was only 2 (Sun & Moon

only)

> > astrology would have been there. The Rishi's selected the 5 then

> known

> > planets along with Sun, Moon, and the Nodal points Ra and Ke to

> create

> > this system, which is a concept based holistic system, which could

> be

> > used to have an understanding of the past-present-future. We are

> trying

> > to understand and use that ancient system created by them, (which

> is

> > currently in an almost demolished state), rather than trying to

> create

> > a new system. Why? Only a person with holistic brain (or say

> meditative

> > brain) can understand the world, which in itself is holistic. i.e.

> Only

> > seers can create a trustworthy system to know past-present-future,

> and

> > we are not of the grade of that great Rishis who created this

> system.

> > Due to this reason we give importance to the original system,

> rather

> > than use/trying_to_use the new planets and the like. If you look

> around

> > you will notice that people with out even an understanding about

> the

> > holistic and logical foundations of Astrology (in short the basics

> of

> > astrology) is trying to use the new planets and trying to project

> them

> > selves as the Seers of the new generation.

> > Get a good understanding of the theoretical foundation of

> astrology.

> > Then this doubt will naturally vanish in no time.

> > Do you find the above statements difficult to digest? I am busy

> now

> > and don't have the time to explain in detail. Please read the

> article,

> > named 'Base of Astrology' in the 'Kerala,India' folder in the

files

> > section of the group. That may help you to understand the above

> > statements made by me.

> > Love,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "nirupam22" <nirupam22@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Friends and guruji's,

> > > I read many e-mails and its answers given by expert astrologers

> from

> > > this group. I may be wrong but i found that planets like

> > > HARSHAL,NEPTUNE and PLUTO are not considered. Is it becaus of

> name of

> > > group that only 9 planets are considered??? Please explain as i

> am in

> > > learning.

> > > Thank you

> > >

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > NIRUPAM

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear sreenadhji,

Got your point. Problem with ancient system is we dont get original

material. atleast i haven't got yet. so in new books these planets

are explained in detail that's why new learners like me get confused

what to do???

 

Regards,

NIRUPAMvedic astrology, "Sreenadh"

<sreelid wrote:

>

> Dear Nirupam ji,

> My answer is there in the previous mail itself. If not clear I

> will, change a sentance and re-state it.

> I said:

> > We are trying to understand and use that ancient system created

> > by them, (which is currently in an almost demolished state),

> > rather than trying to create a new system.

> You can read it as:

> > I am trying to understand and use that ancient system created

> > by Rishis, (which is currently in an almost demolished state),

> > rather than trying to create a new system.

> Is that clear?

> You said:

> > People who consider these planets might be right.

> May be or may not be. Reason stated in previous mail.

> Agin in your words:

> > neglecting these planets really

> > doesn't make any difference?

> Yap. you are right. But that is my openion and many others may

> have a different openion.

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

> vedic astrology, "nirupam22" <nirupam22@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sreenadhji,

> > Thank you for nice explanation.

> > I raised this question becoz many new books in market talk

lot

> > about these planets. As you are experienced person and has seen

many

> > charts what is your experience or you dont consider them at

all???

> > People who consider these planets might be right,but how do

we

> > come to know about the reality? Or neglecting these planets

really

> > doesn't make any difference?

> > Thank You.

> >

> > REGARDS,

> > NIRUPAM.

> > vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Nirupam,

> > > Astrology is a holistic subject, which takes Sign-House-Planet

as

> > its

> > > basic constructs. Here the planet changes form a reality to a

> > concept,

> > > aimed at its usefulness. Even if there was only 2 (Sun & Moon

> only)

> > > astrology would have been there. The Rishi's selected the 5

then

> > known

> > > planets along with Sun, Moon, and the Nodal points Ra and Ke to

> > create

> > > this system, which is a concept based holistic system, which

could

> > be

> > > used to have an understanding of the past-present-future. We

are

> > trying

> > > to understand and use that ancient system created by them,

(which

> > is

> > > currently in an almost demolished state), rather than trying to

> > create

> > > a new system. Why? Only a person with holistic brain (or say

> > meditative

> > > brain) can understand the world, which in itself is holistic.

i.e.

> > Only

> > > seers can create a trustworthy system to know past-present-

future,

> > and

> > > we are not of the grade of that great Rishis who created this

> > system.

> > > Due to this reason we give importance to the original system,

> > rather

> > > than use/trying_to_use the new planets and the like. If you

look

> > around

> > > you will notice that people with out even an understanding

about

> > the

> > > holistic and logical foundations of Astrology (in short the

basics

> > of

> > > astrology) is trying to use the new planets and trying to

project

> > them

> > > selves as the Seers of the new generation.

> > > Get a good understanding of the theoretical foundation of

> > astrology.

> > > Then this doubt will naturally vanish in no time.

> > > Do you find the above statements difficult to digest? I am

busy

> > now

> > > and don't have the time to explain in detail. Please read the

> > article,

> > > named 'Base of Astrology' in the 'Kerala,India' folder in the

> files

> > > section of the group. That may help you to understand the above

> > > statements made by me.

> > > Love,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "nirupam22"

<nirupam22@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Friends and guruji's,

> > > > I read many e-mails and its answers given by expert

astrologers

> > from

> > > > this group. I may be wrong but i found that planets like

> > > > HARSHAL,NEPTUNE and PLUTO are not considered. Is it becaus of

> > name of

> > > > group that only 9 planets are considered??? Please explain as

i

> > am in

> > > > learning.

> > > > Thank you

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > NIRUPAM

> > > >

> > >

> >

>