Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi Pardon me for my intervention. I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga. 1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house. 2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively. Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events. A couple of points on Ramesh's chart. 1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Lakshmi, > I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated. > Chandrashekhar. > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji, > > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this. > > > > Regards, > > Lakshmi > > > > > > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote: > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in > > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati > > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own > > house. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > >> Om Gurave Namah > >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji, > >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and > >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great > >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare > >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest > >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to > >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on > >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work > >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact, > >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is > >> good for the general health & happiness of the person. > >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own > >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20 > >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage. > >> > >> I am posting the charts here. > >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to > >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and > >> discussion. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lakshmi > >> > >> > >> > >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote: > >> > >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you > >> related to > >> guru in various bhavas. > >> > >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when > >> in own > >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front. > >> > >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own > >> sign some > >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood. > >> > >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly. > >> > >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while > >> transiting > >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is > >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th > >> and 9th > >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general. > >> > >> Respect > >> Pradeep > >> > >> vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> <boxdel> > >> wrote: > >> > Dear Anuj, > >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your > >> message > >> to > >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers. > >> There are > >> many > >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the > >> dictum, I > >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier. > >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like > >> Benefic/Malefic > >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more > >> with > >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha > >> Guru as > >> his > >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara > >> telling > >> when > >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and > >> pious > >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and > >> prejudices > >> > apart from application of astrological principles. > >> > Take care, > >> > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > >> > nameisego wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji. > >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru > >> in age > >> and > >> > > experience in this group. > >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right. > >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on " > >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown > >> Guru's > >> > > position in various houses which had been > >> destroyed/troubled by > >> Guru. > >> > > > >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva > >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih" > >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self. > >> > > > >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for > >> yourself and > >> > > check the examples that were given. > >> > > > >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the > >> goodness > >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn > >> sucks the > >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies. > >> > > > >> > > Tatvam-Asi > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan > >> <pnrazdan> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter > >> still > >> > > further. > >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a > >> designated as a > >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of > >> "Karka > >> Bhavo > >> > > Nasa" > >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is > >> placed in. > >> Why > >> > > this > >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic > >> > > Astrology > >> > > > (in lighter vein). > >> > > > > >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not > >> given by > >> you. But > >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always > >> speaks > >> of > >> > > the > >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even > >> said, that > >> > > howsoever > >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the > >> subject. And > >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience. > >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for > >> convincing > >> > > all > >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This > >> would > >> > > even > >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology. > >> > > > Pran Razdan > >> > > > > >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Dear Prafulla, > >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what > >> Shubhangi had > >> asked. > >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum > >> given > >> by > >> > > sages > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one > >> wants to > >> > > > > find > >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac > >> Leo is > >> in > >> > > 5th > >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava > >> Dasha. In > >> > > > > 11th > >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is > >> Shubha > >> > > there. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths > >> considered but > >> not > >> > > as > >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna. > >> > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in > >> Leo for > >> > > > > Muhurta, > >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related > >> configurations),It may > >> > > not > >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally > >> speaking). > >> > > In > >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional > >> strength > >> > > to > >> > > > > > initiate for results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to > >> give > >> > > negative > >> > > > > > results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> > > > > <boxdel> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi, > >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his > >> > > strength in > >> > > > > > Leo > >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for > >> marriages when > >> > > Jupiter > >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That > >> is due > >> to > >> > > the > >> > > > > > fact of > >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun > >> being in > >> own > >> > > Rasi > >> > > > > > makes > >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with > >> Father. But > >> I > >> > > would > >> > > > > > say he > >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession. > >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am > >> curious > >> to > >> > > know > >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo > >> and > >> hence > >> > > this > >> > > > > > email. > >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also. > >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no > >> doubt he > >> is very > >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics > >> and yes, > >> he > >> > > did > >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class. > >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to > >> be the > >> > > > > positioning > >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know > >> why jup > >> > > losses > >> > > > > > strength in leo. > >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both > >> father > >> > > and > >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other. > >> > > > > > > >Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote : > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira, > >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not? > >> > > > > > > >>Regards, > >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna BCS wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>>Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>In your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses > >> strength > >> in Leo. > >> > > > > Any > >> > > > > > problems > >> > > > > > > >>>>in education? > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>No, except for one year I didn't study and > >> failed. > >> That > >> > > was in > >> > > > > > 1986-87, my > >> > > > > > > >>>first year of university. Interesting, I get > >> Vimshottari > >> > > Ven- > >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and > >> > > > > > > >>>Sat for that year. > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>Yours, > >> > > > > > > >>>Dhira Krsna dasa, > >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi > >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com > >> <http://www.radhadesh.com/> > >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Archives: vedic- astrology > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Group info: vedic- > >> > > astrology/info.html > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > >> > > > > vedic astrology- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > >> Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Sponsor* > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > click here > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011 > >> 7 > >> > > > >> 6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6 > >> / > >> > > *http://companion. <http://companion./>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> ------------------------ ------ > >> ----- > >> > > ---- > >> > > > > > * Links* > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * > >> > > > > > vedic- astrology/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * To from this group, send an email to: > >> > > > > > vedic astrology- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > <vedic astrology- ? > >> > > subject=Un> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Your use of is subject to the > >> > >> Terms > >> > > of > >> > > > > > Service <>. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > _______________________________ > >> > > > > >> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > >> > > > http://vote. <http://vote./> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Archives: vedic- astrology > >> > > > >> > > Group info: vedic- > >> astrology/info.html > >> > > > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > >> > >> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > > > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > * Sponsor* > >> > > > >> > > click here > >> > > > >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011 > >> 76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf > >> 6/*http://companion. <http://companion./>> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ------------------------ -------- > >> ------- > >> > > * Links* > >> > > > >> > > * > >> > > vedic astrology/ > >> > > > >> > > * To from this group, send an email to: > >> > > vedic astrology > >> > > <vedic astrology- ? > >> subject=Un> > >> > > > >> > > * Your use of is subject to the > >> Terms of > >> > > Service <>. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Group info: > >> vedic astrology/info.html > >> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > >> vedic astrology- > >> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------- ----------- > >> > >> Mail Address AutoComplete > >> <http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*http://promotions.. com/new_mail/static/ease.html> > >> - You start. We finish. > >> > >> > >> > >> Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > >> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > >> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > vote. <http://vote.> - Register online to vote today! > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > click here > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117 6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/ *http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298> > > > > > > > > ------ > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Dear Ash, Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas. If you are talking about using other parameters in association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not constitute different system than Parashara. Regards, Chandrashekhar. ashsam73 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi Pardon me for my intervention. I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga. 1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house. 2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively. Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events. A couple of points on Ramesh's chart. 1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Lakshmi, > I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated. > Chandrashekhar. > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji, > > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this. > > > > Regards, > > Lakshmi > > > > > > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote: > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in > > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati > > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own > > house. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > >> Om Gurave Namah > >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji, > >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and > >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great > >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare > >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest > >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to > >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on > >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work > >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact, > >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is > >> good for the general health & happiness of the person. > >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own > >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20 > >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage. > >> > >> I am posting the charts here. > >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to > >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and > >> discussion. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lakshmi > >> > >> > >> > >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote: > >> > >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you > >> related to > >> guru in various bhavas. > >> > >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when > >> in own > >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front. > >> > >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own > >> sign some > >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood. > >> > >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly. > >> > >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while > >> transiting > >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is > >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th > >> and 9th > >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general. > >> > >> Respect > >> Pradeep > >> > >> vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> <boxdel> > >> wrote: > >> > Dear Anuj, > >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your > >> message > >> to > >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers. > >> There are > >> many > >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the > >> dictum, I > >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier. > >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like > >> Benefic/Malefic > >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more > >> with > >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha > >> Guru as > >> his > >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara > >> telling > >> when > >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and > >> pious > >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and > >> prejudices > >> > apart from application of astrological principles. > >> > Take care, > >> > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > >> > nameisego wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji. > >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru > >> in age > >> and > >> > > experience in this group. > >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right. > >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on " > >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown > >> Guru's > >> > > position in various houses which had been > >> destroyed/troubled by > >> Guru. > >> > > > >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva > >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih" > >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self. > >> > > > >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for > >> yourself and > >> > > check the examples that were given. > >> > > > >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the > >> goodness > >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn > >> sucks the > >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies. > >> > > > >> > > Tatvam-Asi > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan > >> <pnrazdan> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter > >> still > >> > > further. > >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a > >> designated as a > >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of > >> "Karka > >> Bhavo > >> > > Nasa" > >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is > >> placed in. > >> Why > >> > > this > >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic > >> > > Astrology > >> > > > (in lighter vein). > >> > > > > >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not > >> given by > >> you. But > >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always > >> speaks > >> of > >> > > the > >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even > >> said, that > >> > > howsoever > >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the > >> subject. And > >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience. > >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for > >> convincing > >> > > all > >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This > >> would > >> > > even > >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology. > >> > > > Pran Razdan > >> > > > > >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Dear Prafulla, > >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what > >> Shubhangi had > >> asked. > >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum > >> given > >> by > >> > > sages > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one > >> wants to > >> > > > > find > >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac > >> Leo is > >> in > >> > > 5th > >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava > >> Dasha. In > >> > > > > 11th > >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is > >> Shubha > >> > > there. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths > >> considered but > >> not > >> > > as > >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna. > >> > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in > >> Leo for > >> > > > > Muhurta, > >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related > >> configurations),It may > >> > > not > >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally > >> speaking). > >> > > In > >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional > >> strength > >> > > to > >> > > > > > initiate for results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to > >> give > >> > > negative > >> > > > > > results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > --- In vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> > > > > <boxdel> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi, > >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his > >> > > strength in > >> > > > > > Leo > >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for > >> marriages when > >> > > Jupiter > >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That > >> is due > >> to > >> > > the > >> > > > > > fact of > >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun > >> being in > >> own > >> > > Rasi > >> > > > > > makes > >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with > >> Father. But > >> I > >> > > would > >> > > > > > say he > >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession. > >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am > >> curious > >> to > >> > > know > >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo > >> and > >> hence > >> > > this > >> > > > > > email. > >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also. > >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no > >> doubt he > >> is very > >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics > >> and yes, > >> he > >> > > did > >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class. > >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to > >> be the > >> > > > > positioning > >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know > >> why jup > >> > > losses > >> > > > > > strength in leo. > >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both > >> father > >> > > and > >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other. > >> > > > > > > >Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote : > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira, > >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not? > >> > > > > > > >>Regards, > >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna BCS wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>>Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>In your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses > >> strength > >> in Leo. > >> > > > > Any > >> > > > > > problems > >> > > > > > > >>>>in education? > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>No, except for one year I didn't study and > >> failed. > >> That > >> > > was in > >> > > > > > 1986-87, my > >> > > > > > > >>>first year of university. Interesting, I get > >> Vimshottari > >> > > Ven- > >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and > >> > > > > > > >>>Sat for that year. > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>Yours, > >> > > > > > > >>>Dhira Krsna dasa, > >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi > >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com > >> <http://www.radhadesh.com/> > >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Archives: vedic- astrology > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Group info: vedic- > >> > > astrology/info.html > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > >> > > > > vedic astrology- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > >> Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Sponsor* > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > click here > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011 > >> 7 > >> > > > >> 6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6 > >> / > >> > > *http://companion. <http://companion./>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> ------------------------ ------ > >> ----- > >> > > ---- > >> > > > > > * Links* > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > >> > > > > > vedic- astrology/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * To from this group, send an email to: > >> > > > > > vedic astrology- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > <vedic astrology- ? > >> > > subject=Un> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Your use of Groups is subject to the > >> > >> Terms > >> > > of > >> > > > > > Service <>. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > _______________________________ > >> > > > > >> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > >> > > > http://vote. <http://vote./> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Archives: vedic- astrology > >> > > > >> > > Group info: vedic- > >> astrology/info.html > >> > > > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > >> > >> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ........ > >> > > > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > * Sponsor* > >> > > > >> > > click here > >> > > > >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011 > >> 76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf > >> 6/*http://companion. <http://companion./>> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ------------------------ -------- > >> ------- > >> > > * Links* > >> > > > >> > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > >> > > vedic astrology/ > >> > > > >> > > * To from this group, send an email to: > >> > > vedic astrology > >> > > <vedic astrology- ? > >> subject=Un> > >> > > > >> > > * Your use of is subject to the > >> Terms of > >> > > Service <>. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Group info: > >> vedic astrology/info.html > >> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > >> vedic astrology- > >> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------- ----------- > >> > >> Mail Address AutoComplete > >> <http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*http://promotions.. com/new_mail/static/ease.html> > >> - You start. We finish. > >> > >> > >> > >> Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > >> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > >> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > >> > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > vote. <http://vote.> - Register online to vote today! > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > click here > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117 6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/ *http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298> > > > > > > > > ------ > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ? I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware. In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis strength. The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use Varharmiras scheme ? To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house . Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart. These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following. 1) 4:10 2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration 3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus. 4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans. 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets 6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus 7) Adjustment of 6th lord. After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house. You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar dasha. I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time. Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give results for 10th house. If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani. At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru antra. House Signs SAV Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 Gemini 23 16 19 13 20 17 7 16 2 Cancer 24 10 15 20 23 23 14 16 3 Leo 30 9 21 9 19 11 11 13 4 Virgo 26 7 22 9 24 14 4 23 5 Libra 33 8 23 5 20 22 16 19 6 Scorpio 32 16 20 21 24 13 9 17 7 Sagittarius 20 7 19 5 25 17 12 8 8 Capricorn 21 15 19 9 24 9 12 12 9 Aquarius 29 7 17 13 11 14 22 9 10 Pisces 29 13 10 -2 17 22 9 7 11 Aries 40 11 21 10 26 14 10 19 12 Taurus 30 5 21 10 19 12 10 20 Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash,Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.If you are talking about using other parameters in association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not constitute different system than Parashara.Regards,Chandrashekhar.ashsam73 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and LakshmiPardon me for my intervention.I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively.Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra.Thanking you,Cheers !!!Ash--- In vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Lakshmi,> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.> Chandrashekhar.> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,> > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.> > > > Regards,> > Lakshmi> > > >> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:> >> > Dear Lakshmi,> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own> > house.> > Chandrashekhar.> >> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> >> >> Om Gurave Namah> >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji,> >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work> >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact,> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is> >> good for the general health & happiness of the person.> >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage.> >> > >> I am posting the charts here.> >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and> >> discussion.> >> > >> Regards,> >> Lakshmi > >> > >>> >>> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote:> >>> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >>> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you> >> related to> >> guru in various bhavas.> >>> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when> >> in own> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front.> >>> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own> >> sign some> >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood.> >>> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.> >>> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while> >> transiting> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th> >> and 9th> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general.> >>> >> Respect> >> Pradeep> >>> >> --- In vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> <boxdel>> >> wrote:> >> > Dear Anuj,> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your> >> message> >> to> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers.> >> There are> >> many> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the> >> dictum, I> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like> >> Benefic/Malefic> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more> >> with> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha> >> Guru as> >> his> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara> >> telling> >> when> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and> >> pious> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and> >> prejudices> >> > apart from application of astrological principles.> >> > Take care,> >> > Chandrashekhar.> >> >> >> > nameisego wrote:> >> >> >> > >> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru> >> in age> >> and> >> > > experience in this group.> >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right.> >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on "> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown> >> Guru's> >> > > position in various houses which had been> >> destroyed/troubled by> >> Guru.> >> > >> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.> >> > >> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for> >> yourself and> >> > > check the examples that were given.> >> > >> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the> >> goodness> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn> >> sucks the> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies.> >> > >> >> > > Tatvam-Asi> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan> >> <pnrazdan>> >> > > wrote:> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,> >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter> >> still> >> > > further.> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a> >> designated as a> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of> >> "Karka> >> Bhavo> >> > > Nasa"> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is> >> placed in.> >> Why> >> > > this> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic> >> > > Astrology> >> > > > (in lighter vein).> >> > > >> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not> >> given by> >> you. But> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always> >> speaks> >> of> >> > > the> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even> >> said, that> >> > > howsoever> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the> >> subject. And> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience.> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for> >> convincing> >> > > all> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This> >> would> >> > > even> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology.> >> > > > Pran Razdan> >> > > >> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> >> > > >> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what> >> Shubhangi had> >> asked.> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum> >> given> >> by> >> > > sages> >> > > > > and> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one> >> wants to> >> > > > > find> >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac> >> Leo is> >> in> >> > > 5th> >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava> >> Dasha. In> >> > > > > 11th> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is> >> Shubha> >> > > there.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths> >> considered but> >> not> >> > > as> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna.> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:> >> > > > >> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in> >> Leo for> >> > > > > Muhurta,> >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related> >> configurations),It may> >> > > not> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally> >> speaking).> >> > > In> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional> >> strength> >> > > to> >> > > > > > initiate for results.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to> >> give> >> > > negative> >> > > > > > results.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> > > > > <boxdel>> >> > > > > > wrote:> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his> >> > > strength in> >> > > > > > Leo> >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for> >> marriages when> >> > > Jupiter> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That> >> is due> >> to> >> > > the> >> > > > > > fact of> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun> >> being in> >> own> >> > > Rasi> >> > > > > > makes> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with> >> Father. But> >> I> >> > > would> >> > > > > > say he> >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession.> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote:> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am> >> curious> >> to> >> > > know> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo> >> and> >> hence> >> > > this> >> > > > > > email.> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also.> >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no> >> doubt he> >> is very> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics> >> and yes,> >> he> >> > > did> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class.> >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to> >> be the> >> > > > > positioning> >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know> >> why jup> >> > > losses> >> > > > > > strength in leo.> >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both> >> father> >> > > and> >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other.> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,> >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not?> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,> >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna BCS wrote:> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>>Dear Chandrashekhar,> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>In your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses> >> strength> >> in Leo.> >> > > > > Any> >> > > > > > problems> >> > > > > > > >>>>in education?> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>No, except for one year I didn't study and> >> failed.> >> That> >> > > was in> >> > > > > > 1986-87, my> >> > > > > > > >>>first year of university. Interesting, I get> >> Vimshottari> >> > > Ven-> >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and> >> > > > > > > >>>Sat for that year.> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>Yours,> >> > > > > > > >>>Dhira Krsna dasa,> >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi> >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com> >> <http://www.radhadesh.com/>> >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Group info: vedic-> >> > > astrology/info.html> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> >> > > > > vedic astrology-> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> >> Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > * Sponsor*> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > click here> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011> >> 7> >> > >> >> 6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6> >> /> >> > > *http://companion. <http://companion./>>> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> ------------------------------> >> -----> >> > > ----> >> > > > > > * Links*> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > * > >> > > > > > vedic astrology/> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * To from this group, send an email to:> >> > > > > > vedic astrology> >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > <vedic astrology?> >> > > subject=Un>> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Your use of is subject to the> >> > >> Terms> >> > > of> >> > > > > > Service <>.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > _______________________________> >> > > > > >> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!> >> > > > http://vote. <http://vote./>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > >> >> > > Group info: vedic-> >> astrology/info.html> >> > >> >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >> > >> > >> >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > >> >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > * Sponsor*> >> > > > >> > > click here> >> > >> >> <http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011> >> 76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf> >> 6/*http://companion. <http://companion./>>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------> >> -------> >> > > * Links*> >> > >> >> > > * > >> > > vedic astrology/> >> > > > >> > > * > >> > > vedic astrology> >> > > <vedic astrology?> >> subject=Un>> >> > > > >> > > * > >> Terms of> >> > > Service <>.> >> > >> >> > >> >>> >>> >>> >> Archives: vedic astrology> >>> >> Group info:> >> vedic astrology/info.html> >>> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> >> vedic astrology-> >>> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> ------> >> > >> Mail Address AutoComplete> >> <http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*/static/ease.html>> >> - You start. We finish.> >>> >> Archives: vedic astrology> >>> >> Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> >>> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >>> >> ........ May Jupiter's light shine on us ........> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> >> > > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> >> > ------> > Do you ?> > vote. <http://vote.> - Register online to vote today!> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >> > > >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> >> > * Sponsor*> > > > click here > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298> > >> >> >> > ------> > * Links*> >> > * > > vedic astrology/> > > > * To from this group, send an email to:> > vedic astrology> > <vedic astrology?subject=Un>> > > > * Terms of> > Service <>.> >> >Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Mail is new and improved - Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Dear Ash, I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a combination of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system. There is no harm in using it as long as results come true. However it is not a different Ashtakavarga system per se. I was talking about a different Ashtakavarga system that you had suggested exists. Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no doubt yet it is only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one more bindu of influence for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might not mean that other planet is getting a bindu less.I said 19 Bindus as the chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that format. Varahamihira has exactly 8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is not a different system. He only has a different opinion about which places are influenced by Lagna in case of some of the planets. Parashara has, on the other hand, exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga. I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than Guru in reply to Lakshmi. The reason it is not reflected in the table given by you is,as you have indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not considered in the system you are using. Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the Navamsha placement of planets could also change. If you apply the strength from Navamsha as given in the chart provided by Lakshmi, you will see my view point. Regards, Chandrashekhar. Ash wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi, There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ? I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware. In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis strength. The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use Varharmiras scheme ? To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house . Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart. These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following. 1) 4:10 2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration 3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus. 4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans. 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets 6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus 7) Adjustment of 6th lord. After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house. You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar dasha. I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time. Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give results for 10th house. If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani. At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru antra. House Signs SAV Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 Gemini 23 16 19 13 20 17 7 16 2 Cancer 24 10 15 20 23 23 14 16 3 Leo 30 9 21 9 19 11 11 13 4 Virgo 26 7 22 9 24 14 4 23 5 Libra 33 8 23 5 20 22 16 19 6 Scorpio 32 16 20 21 24 13 9 17 7 Sagittarius 20 7 19 5 25 17 12 8 8 Capricorn 21 15 19 9 24 9 12 12 9 Aquarius 29 7 17 13 11 14 22 9 10 Pisces 29 13 10 -2 17 22 9 7 11 Aries 40 11 21 10 26 14 10 19 12 Taurus 30 5 21 10 19 12 10 20 Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash, Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas. If you are talking about using other parameters in association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not constitute different system than Parashara. Regards, Chandrashekhar. ashsam73 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi Pardon me for my intervention. I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga. 1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house. 2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively. Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events. A couple of points on Ramesh's chart. 1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Lakshmi, > I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated. > Chandrashekhar. > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji, > > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this. > > > > Regards, > > Lakshmi > > > > > > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote: > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in > > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati > > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own > > house. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > >> Om Gurave Namah > >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji, > >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and > >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great > >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare > >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest > >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to > >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on > >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work > >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact, > >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is > >> good for the general health & happiness of the person. > >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own > >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20 > >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage. > >> > >> I am posting the charts here. > >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to > >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and > >> discussion. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lakshmi > >> > >> > >> > >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote: > >> > >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you > >> related to > >> guru in various bhavas. > >> > >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when > >> in own > >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front. > >> > >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own > >> sign some > >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood. > >> > >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly. > >> > >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while > >> transiting > >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is > >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th > >> and 9th > >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general. > >> > >> Respect > >> Pradeep > >> > >> vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> <boxdel> > >> wrote: > >> > Dear Anuj, > >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your > >> message > >> to > >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers. > >> There are > >> many > >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the > >> dictum, I > >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier. > >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like > >> Benefic/Malefic > >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more > >> with > >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha > >> Guru as > >> his > >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara > >> telling > >> when > >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and > >> pious > >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and > >> prejudices > >> > apart from application of astrological principles. > >> > Take care, > >> > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > >> > nameisego wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji. > >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru > >> in age > >> and > >> > > experience in this group. > >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right. > >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on " > >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown > >> Guru's > >> > > position in various houses which had been > >> destroyed/troubled by > >> Guru. > >> > > > >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva > >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih" > >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self. > >> > > > >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for > >> yourself and > >> > > check the examples that were given. > >> > > > >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the > >> goodness > >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn > >> sucks the > >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies. > >> > > > >> > > Tatvam-Asi > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan > >> <pnrazdan> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter > >> still > >> > > further. > >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a > >> designated as a > >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of > >> "Karka > >> Bhavo > >> > > Nasa" > >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is > >> placed in. > >> Why > >> > > this > >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic > >> > > Astrology > >> > > > (in lighter vein). > >> > > > > >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not > >> given by > >> you. But > >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always > >> speaks > >> of > >> > > the > >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even > >> said, that > >> > > howsoever > >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the > >> subject. And > >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience. > >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for > >> convincing > >> > > all > >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This > >> would > >> > > even > >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology. > >> > > > Pran Razdan > >> > > > > >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Dear Prafulla, > >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what > >> Shubhangi had > >> asked. > >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum > >> given > >> by > >> > > sages > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one > >> wants to > >> > > > > find > >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac > >> Leo is > >> in > >> > > 5th > >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava > >> Dasha. In > >> > > > > 11th > >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is > >> Shubha > >> > > there. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths > >> considered but > >> not > >> > > as > >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna. > >> > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in > >> Leo for > >> > > > > Muhurta, > >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related > >> configurations),It may > >> > > not > >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally > >> speaking). > >> > > In > >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional > >> strength > >> > > to > >> > > > > > initiate for results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to > >> give > >> > > negative > >> > > > > > results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> > > > > <boxdel> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi, > >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his > >> > > strength in > >> > > > > > Leo > >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for > >> marriages when > >> > > Jupiter > >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That > >> is due > >> to > >> > > the > >> > > > > > fact of > >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun > >> being in > >> own > >> > > Rasi > >> > > > > > makes > >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with > >> Father. But > >> I > >> > > would > >> > > > > > say he > >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession. > >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am > >> curious > >> to > >> > > know > >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo > >> and > >> hence > >> > > this > >> > > > > > email. > >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also. > >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no > >> doubt he > >> is very > >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics > >> and yes, > >> he > >> > > did > >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class. > >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to > >> be the > >> > > > > positioning > >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know > >> why jup > >> > > losses > >> > > > > > strength in leo. > >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both > >> father > >> > > and > >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other. > >> > > > > > > >Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote : > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira, > >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not? > >> > > > > > > >>Regards, > >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > >> > >& Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 My answers in CAPS below. Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash,I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a combination of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system. ASH : THE SYSTEM I USE IS KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARG AND ITS PART OF VEDIC ASTROLOGY. I DONT KNOW WHAT U MEAN BY GRAHA BHAVA BALA SYSTEM. IN SHORT WE CAN COMPUTE THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND ALSO FOR ALL 16 D CHARTS. SO ITS VEDIC ASTROLOGY ONLY AND NOT DIFFERENT. AS PER KAS WE DO NOT TALK IN GENERAL TERMS AS SHANI IS STRONG OR WEAK BUT WE CAN GO INTO DETAILS AS PER POINTS AND FIND OUT HOW A PLANET WILL ACT FOR EACH HOUSE. IN MOST CASES PLANETS DO NOT ACT BAD FOR ALL HOUSES. IN SHANI ANTRA AS PER RAMESH'S CHART IT WILL BE GOOD FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AS COMPARED TO GURU'S ANTRA FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AT THE SAME TIME FOR 10TH HOUSE MATTESR GURU WILL BE MUCH STRONGER THAN SHANI AS YOU CAN SEE AS PER POINTS. ABOUT NAVAMSA I SHALL COMMENT BELOW. There is no harm in using it as long as results come true. However it is not a different Ashtakavarga system per se. ASH : ASHTAKVARG IS ASHTAKVARG AND HOW TO USE IT IS NOT GIVEN CLEARLY IN ANY TEXTS. PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION BASED ON CURRENT TEXTS THAT ITS USED TO TIME DEATH OR ITS USE IS LIMITED TO TRANSITS WHICH IS NOT CORRECT. THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN WHAT I TRY TO SAY AND EXPLAIN WHEN PEOPLE COMMENT ON ASHTAKVARGA AND ITS USED ONLY IN TRANSITS. THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN WHICH ITS USED TO TIME EVENTS IS NOT WRITTEN IN ANY BOOK OR CLASSICS DESPITE MANY MAHARISHIS LIKE PARASARA, VARHARAMIRA ETC HAVE ALL MENTIONED ASHTAKVARGA IN THEIR TEXTS. I was talking about a different Ashtakavarga system that you had suggested exists. ASH : I HAVE NOT SUGGESTED ANYTHING OF THAT KIND. KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARGA SYSTEM IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH WE USE ASHTAKVARGA TO FIND THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH HOUSE. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS ANY SYSTEM OUT THERE THAT DOES THAT. RESULTS CAN BE SEEN AT A GLANCE. FOR EXAMPLE RAMESHS MARRIAGE MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED DURING MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY HAS THE HIGHEST STRENGTH IN THE CHART FOR 7TH HOUSE. AND IS LOD OR 10TH LORD FROM 7TH HOUSE. MAHADAHSA CAN BE THAT OF SHANI. SHANI IS SAMDHARMI TO NAKTURAL KARAK VENUS OF MARRIAGE. SO SHANI MD/ MERCURY AD CAN GIVE MARRIAGE. THERE ARE 2 ZEROES IN BAV ONE DUE TO VENUS AND OTHER DUE TO MARS AND MERCURY SO RESULT WILL BE IN LAST SECTOR OF MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY ANTRA RUNS IN SHANI MD RUNS FROM 1983/11 THRU 1986/JULY. 3RD SECTOR STARTS 1985/07 THRU 1986/07. I AM NOT GOING FURTHER. IF THIS IS IN THE BALL PARK ITS GOOD AND ONE CAN NARROW IT DOWN FURTHER WITH SUNS TRANSIT OVER STRONG SIGNIFICATORS FOR 7TH HOUSE AS PER THE WORKSHEET POINTS. MAYBE LAKSHMI CAN VERIFY WHEN HER MARRIAGE TOOK PLACE WITH RAMESH. Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no doubt yet it is only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one more bindu of influence for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might not mean that other planet is getting a bindu less. ASH : THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT SCHEME THAT IS IN TEXTS TODAY AVAILABLE GIVEN AS PER PARASARA AND WHATS GIVEN OR PRESERVED FROM VARHARAMIRA. BOTH ARE GREAT SAGES AND THEIR BAV SCHEMES MUST BE SAME. PARASARAS HAS BEEN CORRPUT OVER TIME. THE DIFFERENCES IN IN BAV FOR MOONS PLACMENT FROM MOON AND GURU AND VENUS FROM MARS. THIS HAS VERY DEEP MEANING AND SAYING FOR EXAMPLE IF VENUS GETS POWER IF IN 4TH FROM MARS AND IF VENUS IS NOT GETTING POWER OR A BINDU IF IN 4TH FROM MARS HAS A BIG DIFFERENCE. THERE ARE ONLY 337 POINTS AND IT WOULD MEAN THAT IF AS IN THE CASE OF RAMESHES CHART IF HIS 7TH BHAVA GETS 19TH IT MEANS THAT THAT 1 BINDU OF FROM THE POOL OF 337 HAS GONE TO SOME OTHER HOUSE. IF A PLANET IS IN THAT HOUSE IT MAY GET 1 BINDU MORE STRENGTH AND IT MAY CHANGE THE ENTIRE CHART. IF THAT PLANET IS IN 4TH FROM A MALEFIC PLANET (BY MALEFIC I MEAN A PLANET WITH < 4 BINDUS EXCEPT MOON) AND IF THAT PLANET WERE TO GET STRNGTH THEN THAT PLANET WOULD BECOME VERY STRONG FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. THAT WOULD CHANGE THE ENTIRE COMPLEXION OF THE CHART. WITH ASKTAVARG WE ARE VERY PARTICULAR AND THIS IS NOT A TRIVIAL MATTER. 1 BINDUS CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. I said 19 Bindus as the chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that format. Varahamihira has exactly 8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is not a different system. He only has a different opinion about which places are influenced by Lagna in case of some of the planets. Parashara has, on the other hand, exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga. ASH : THIS IS NOT TRUE. BAV SCHEMES HAVE TO MATCH. I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BY SYSTEMS. THE CORE AND BASIC OF ASHTAKVARG SYSTEM IS THE BAV POINTS. IF PARASARA IS SAYING THAT MOON IS NOT GIVING STRENGTH TO 9TH BHAVA WHEAREAS VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING IT DOES. THIS IS HUGE DIFFERECE OUT HERE. SIMILARLY MOON IS BENEFIC IN 2ND FROM GURU AND VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING THAT 1 BINDUS STRENGTH IS NOT GIVEN. THIS IS THE BASIC. YOU JUST CANNOT SAY THAT THE DIFFERENCE OF OPINION IS "ONLY". THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING. IMAGINE A SYSTEM THAT IS USED ACCURATELY FOR TIMING OF EVENTS THE SAV VALUES FROM WHICH THE STRENGTH OF ALL PLANEST AND FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE IS COMPUTED AND ITS BASED ON SAV AND SAV IS BASED ON BAV. IN THE LEAST WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MIGHT SURMOUNT TO COMPOUNDING OF ERROR. ACTUALLY IF YOU STUDY HOW ONE COMES TO THE POINTS THAT I HAVE DISPLAYED IN MY PREVIOUS MAILS YOU WILL BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND WHY I AM SO PICKY WITH THIS DISTRIBUTION OF BAV AND STICKING TO VARHARAMIRA. IF WE DIFFER ON THIS VIEW WE CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE. I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than Guru in reply to Lakshmi. ASH : YES, I DID READ YOUR INTERSTING COMMENT BUT I WAS NOT CLEAR ON WHAT YOU MEANT BY STRONGER. STRONGER FOR WHAT EVENTS ? DID U MEAN STRONGER FOR DELIVERING RESULTS OR ALL 12 HOUSES. CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC. WHEN I GAVE THE POINTS I AM BEING VERY SPECIFIC AND COMPARING GURU WITH SHANI FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. I AM BEING SPECIFIC IN SAYING THAT IN GURU ANTRA RAMESH WILL HAVE MORE AUTHORITY AS COMPARED TO SHANI. GURU IS IN UPCAHYA FROM 10TH HOUSE AND WITH 5 BINDUS. SO ITS VERY EAGER TO GIVE 2ND AND 10TH HOUSE MATTERS. SHANI IS EAGER TO GIVE RESULTS FOR 12TH, 4TH, 11TH, AND 3RD HOUSE IN ITS ANTRA. CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC. I DO NOT THINK SHANI IS BAD FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND NEITHER IS GURU IN HIS ANTRA. AGAIN I AM RESTRICTING THE RESULTS TO THE ANTRA. I THINK IF U ARE MORE SPECIFIC THEN WE MIGHT BE SAYING THE SAME THING BUT FROM A DIFFERENT VIEW POINT. The reason it is not reflected in the table given by you is,as you have indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not considered in the system you are using. ASH : THIS IS INCORRECT. THE STRENGTH IS DERIVED FROM RASHI AND THE WORKSHEET POINTS ARE FROM RASHI ONLY. NAVAMSA HAS EQUAL STATUS AS COMPARED TO RASHI. WE USE NAVAMSA FOR FINDING OUT THE SAMDHARMIS AND ALSO DELAY. ALL COMBINATIONS HAVE TO BE CHECKED FROM BOTH RASI AND NAVAMSA. BUT FOR FINDING OUT THE STRENGH OF PLANET ITS DONE FROM RASI. A WORKSHEET FOR EACH DIVISIONAL CHART IS ALSO CASTED. Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the Navamsha placement of planets could also change. If you apply the strength from Navamsha as given in the chart provided by Lakshmi, you will see my view point. ASH : IT WILL NOT CHANGE THINGS. I CHECKED AFTER READING THIS COMMENT. IN BOTH CASES USING KRUSHNAS AYANAMSA AND LAHIRI SHANI REMAINS IN LIBRA IN NAVAMSA SO ITS SAMDHARMI TO VENUS. IT WILL REPLACE VENUS FOR THE HOUSE THAT VENUS IS UNABLE TO DELIVER RESULTS. THE POSITION OF MARS CHANGES IN LAGNA THOUGH. MAYBE IF U SEE THINGS WITH MARS BEING IN 12TH INSTEAD OF 11TH YOU MAY SEE MY VIEW POINT. AGAIN I AM EMPHASISING ON THE FACT THAT STRENGTH OR THE WORKSHEET THAT I GAVE IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI ONLY AND SAMDHARMIS IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI AND NAVAMSA. RASHI AND NAVAMSA HAVE EQUAL STATUS AS PER KAS AND WE FOLLOW CERTAIN RULES FOR FINDING DELAY. I HAVE DEMONSTRATED IN THIS MAIL REGARDING MARRIAGE OF RAMESH WITH LAKSHMI. FOR THAT I HAVE COMPUTED DELAY FOR MARRIAGE USING 2 ZEROES, AND SHANI ASPECTING PRIMIARY SIGNIFICATOR HOUSES FROM RASHI AND THEIR LORDS IN NAVAMSA AND USING WORKSHEET STRENGTH I HAVE COMPUTED THE TIME FRAME. IT WILL BE INTERSTING IF LAKSHMI CAN COMMENT ON THE SAME. THERE IS A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE IN THE WORKSHEET. SOME HOW IN HASTE MY AYANAMSA CHANGE BUT IT WILL NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR MARRAIGE. HERE IS THE CORRECTED VERSION OF THE WORKSHEET. MERCURY STILL HAS 18 POINTS FOR 7TH HOUSE AND MOSTLY ALL HOUSES. Hse SAV Pt Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 25 17 20 12 20 11 7 10 2 23 9 16 14 22 22 14 12 3 31 16 15 12 11 4 14 7 4 26 11 17 7 23 7 10 23 5 32 12 23 9 19 16 22 15 6 32 18 16 18 21 5 8 11 7 20 10 14 9 18 11 18 10 8 19 22 12 9 25 4 17 10 9 28 8 12 14 7 5 21 3 10 34 17 13 7 16 21 16 4 11 38 16 15 15 21 4 15 19 12 29 10 14 11 9 8 14 15 THANKING YOU, CHEERS !!! ASH Regards,Chandrashekhar.Ash wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi, There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ? I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware. In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis strength. The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use Varharmiras scheme ? To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house . Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart. These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following. 1) 4:10 2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration 3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus. 4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans. 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets 6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus 7) Adjustment of 6th lord. After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house. You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar dasha. I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time. Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give results for 10th house. If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani. At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru antra. House Signs SAV Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 Gemini 23 16 19 13 20 17 7 16 2 Cancer 24 10 15 20 23 23 14 16 3 Leo 30 9 21 9 19 11 11 13 4 Virgo 26 7 22 9 24 14 4 23 5 Libra 33 8 23 5 20 22 16 19 6 Scorpio 32 16 20 21 24 13 9 17 7 Sagittarius 20 7 19 5 25 17 12 8 8 Capricorn 21 15 19 9 24 9 12 12 9 Aquarius 29 7 17 13 11 14 22 9 10 Pisces 29 13 10 -2 17 22 9 7 11 Aries 40 11 21 10 26 14 10 19 12 Taurus 30 5 21 10 19 12 10 20 Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash,Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.If you are talking about using other parameters in association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not constitute different system than Parashara.Regards,Chandrashekhar.ashsam73 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and LakshmiPardon me for my intervention.I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively.Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra.Thanking you,Cheers !!!Ash--- In vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Lakshmi,> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.> Chandrashekhar.> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,> > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.> > > > Regards,> > Lakshmi> > > >> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:> >> > Dear Lakshmi,> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own> > house.> > Chandrashekhar.> >> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> >> >> Om Gurave Namah> >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji,> >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work> >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact,> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is> >> good for the general health & happiness of the person.> >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage.> >> > >> I am posting the charts here.> >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and> >> discussion.> >> > >> Regards,> >> Lakshmi > >> > >>> >>> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote:> >>> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >>> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you> >> related to> >> guru in various bhavas.> >>> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when> >> in own> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front.> >>> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own> >> sign some> >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood.> >>> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.> >>> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while> >> transiting> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th> >> and 9th> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general.> >>> >> Respect> >> Pradeep> >>> >> --- In vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> <boxdel>> >> wrote:> >> > Dear Anuj,> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your> >> message> >> to> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers.> >> There are> >> many> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the> >> dictum, I> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like> >> Benefic/Malefic> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more> >> with> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha> >> Guru as> >> his> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara> >> telling> >> when> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and> >> pious> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and> >> prejudices> >> > apart from application of astrological principles.> >> > Take care,> >> > Chandrashekhar.> >> >> >> > nameisego wrote:> >> >> >> > >> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru> >> in age> >> and> >> > > experience in this group.> >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right.> >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on "> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown> >> Guru's> >> > > position in various houses which had been> >> destroyed/troubled by> >> Guru.> >> > >> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.> >> > >> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for> >> yourself and> >> > > check the examples that were given.> >> > >> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the> >> goodness> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn> >> sucks the> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies.> >> > >> >> > > Tatvam-Asi> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan> >> <pnrazdan>> >> > > wrote:> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,> >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter> >> still> >> > > further.> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a> >> designated as a> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of> >> "Karka> >> Bhavo> >> > > Nasa"> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is> >> placed in.> >> Why> >> > > this> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic> >> > > Astrology> >> > > > (in lighter vein).> >> > > >> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not> >> given by> >> you. But> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always> >> speaks> >> of> >> > > the> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even> >> said, that> >> > > howsoever> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the> >> subject. And> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience.> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for> >> convincing> >> > > all> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This> >> would> >> > > even> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology.> >> > > > Pran Razdan> >> > > >> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> >> > > >> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what> >> Shubhangi had> >> asked.> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum> >> given> >> by> >> > > sages> >> > > > > and> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one> >> wants to> >> > > > > find> >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac> >> Leo is> >> in> >> > > 5th> >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava> >> Dasha. In> >> > > > > 11th> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is> >> Shubha> >> > > there.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths> >> considered but> >> not> >> > > as> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna.> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:> >> > > > >> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in> >> Leo for> >> > > > > Muhurta,> >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related> >> configurations),It may> >> > > not> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally> >> speaking).> >> > > In> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional> >> strength> >> > > to> >> > > > > > initiate for results.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to> >> give> >> > > negative> >> > > > > > results.> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> > > > > <boxdel>> >> > > > > > wrote:> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his> >> > > strength in> >> > > > > > Leo> >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for> >> marriages when> >> > > Jupiter> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That> >> is due> >> to> >> > > the> >> > > > > > fact of> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun> >> being in> >> own> >> > > Rasi> >> > > > > > makes> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with> >> Father. But> >> I> >> > > would> >> > > > > > say he> >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession.> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote:> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am> >> curious> >> to> >> > > know> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo> >> and> >> hence> >> > > this> >> > > > > > email.> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also.> >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no> >> doubt he> >> is very> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics> >> and yes,> >> he> >> > > did> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class.> >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to> >> be the> >> > > > > positioning> >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know> >> why jup> >> > > losses> >> > > > > > strength in leo.> >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both> >> father> >> > > and> >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other.> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,> >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not?> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,> >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > > >>> >& Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Dear Ash, Ashtakavarga system is based on Bindus allotted to particular houses for each of the planet with respect to its position from the planet whose Ashtakavarga is being drawn. The system you are using is based on considering the strengths of planets and the Bhavas too. This is the system generally referred as Parashari or more precisely Hora system which also encompasses the Ashtakavarga system.Ashtakavarga is primarily used to find out effects from Transit of planets and longevity as made clear in conversation between Maitreya and sage Parashara in BPHS. Ashtakavarga system is clearly defined in that text. No doubt the system can be adopted to various other predictions, as it indicates influences on various bhavas. Its various uses have been well documented in numerous texts besides BPHS and the very short description of Varahamihira. The assumption that its use is not mentioned for different uses in any other text but the two you mentioned is not factually correct. Krushna has developed different parameters and as long as the system delivers results there should be no issue with that. It is easy to say that Parashara and Varahamihira's texts are corrupted, and they could be. But that does not prove that the bindus used are wrong especially as most of other parameters that you mention are drawn from these very texts. It is well known that Varaha Mihira was influenced by Greek astrologers and has adopted some of their methods, so the bindus that he attributes could also have come from them. Since you give equal importance to Navamsha and Rasi whereas I go by the old time system of planetary strength being derived from Navamsha, it might not be possible for you to follow my meaning and reasons behind attributing more strength to Saturn over Jupiter. The question of strength of the two planets was raised by Lakshmi and I was responding to that. I so far as influence over all 12 Rasis comment is concerned, Vedic astrology does think that planets have influence over all Bhavas and other planets and the way the results would manifest depend on their mutual relation. About not considering Navamsha strength, I am not able to follow what you are saying. On the one hand you say that these being equal you do not consider Navamsha in worksheet and that you only use Navamsha to find samdharmi and on the other hand you say that my contention is not correct. Again you are talking about timing of events and the original thread is about Guru's capacity to harm the house occupied by it. Anyway let us await Lakshmi's comment about your observation on Mercury Antar, though this is not part of the original discussions. Regards, Chandrashekhar. Ash wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar, My answers in CAPS below. Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash, I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a combination of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system. ASH : THE SYSTEM I USE IS KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARG AND ITS PART OF VEDIC ASTROLOGY. I DONT KNOW WHAT U MEAN BY GRAHA BHAVA BALA SYSTEM. IN SHORT WE CAN COMPUTE THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND ALSO FOR ALL 16 D CHARTS. SO ITS VEDIC ASTROLOGY ONLY AND NOT DIFFERENT. AS PER KAS WE DO NOT TALK IN GENERAL TERMS AS SHANI IS STRONG OR WEAK BUT WE CAN GO INTO DETAILS AS PER POINTS AND FIND OUT HOW A PLANET WILL ACT FOR EACH HOUSE. IN MOST CASES PLANETS DO NOT ACT BAD FOR ALL HOUSES. IN SHANI ANTRA AS PER RAMESH'S CHART IT WILL BE GOOD FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AS COMPARED TO GURU'S ANTRA FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AT THE SAME TIME FOR 10TH HOUSE MATTESR GURU WILL BE MUCH STRONGER THAN SHANI AS YOU CAN SEE AS PER POINTS. ABOUT NAVAMSA I SHALL COMMENT BELOW. There is no harm in using it as long as results come true. However it is not a different Ashtakavarga system per se. ASH : ASHTAKVARG IS ASHTAKVARG AND HOW TO USE IT IS NOT GIVEN CLEARLY IN ANY TEXTS. PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION BASED ON CURRENT TEXTS THAT ITS USED TO TIME DEATH OR ITS USE IS LIMITED TO TRANSITS WHICH IS NOT CORRECT. THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN WHAT I TRY TO SAY AND EXPLAIN WHEN PEOPLE COMMENT ON ASHTAKVARGA AND ITS USED ONLY IN TRANSITS. THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN WHICH ITS USED TO TIME EVENTS IS NOT WRITTEN IN ANY BOOK OR CLASSICS DESPITE MANY MAHARISHIS LIKE PARASARA, VARHARAMIRA ETC HAVE ALL MENTIONED ASHTAKVARGA IN THEIR TEXTS. I was talking about a different Ashtakavarga system that you had suggested exists. ASH : I HAVE NOT SUGGESTED ANYTHING OF THAT KIND. KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARGA SYSTEM IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH WE USE ASHTAKVARGA TO FIND THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH HOUSE. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS ANY SYSTEM OUT THERE THAT DOES THAT. RESULTS CAN BE SEEN AT A GLANCE. FOR EXAMPLE RAMESHS MARRIAGE MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED DURING MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY HAS THE HIGHEST STRENGTH IN THE CHART FOR 7TH HOUSE. AND IS LOD OR 10TH LORD FROM 7TH HOUSE. MAHADAHSA CAN BE THAT OF SHANI. SHANI IS SAMDHARMI TO NAKTURAL KARAK VENUS OF MARRIAGE. SO SHANI MD/ MERCURY AD CAN GIVE MARRIAGE. THERE ARE 2 ZEROES IN BAV ONE DUE TO VENUS AND OTHER DUE TO MARS AND MERCURY SO RESULT WILL BE IN LAST SECTOR OF MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY ANTRA RUNS IN SHANI MD RUNS FROM 1983/11 THRU 1986/JULY. 3RD SECTOR STARTS 1985/07 THRU 1986/07. I AM NOT GOING FURTHER. IF THIS IS IN THE BALL PARK ITS GOOD AND ONE CAN NARROW IT DOWN FURTHER WITH SUNS TRANSIT OVER STRONG SIGNIFICATORS FOR 7TH HOUSE AS PER THE WORKSHEET POINTS. MAYBE LAKSHMI CAN VERIFY WHEN HER MARRIAGE TOOK PLACE WITH RAMESH. Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no doubt yet it is only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one more bindu of influence for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might not mean that other planet is getting a bindu less. ASH : THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT SCHEME THAT IS IN TEXTS TODAY AVAILABLE GIVEN AS PER PARASARA AND WHATS GIVEN OR PRESERVED FROM VARHARAMIRA. BOTH ARE GREAT SAGES AND THEIR BAV SCHEMES MUST BE SAME. PARASARAS HAS BEEN CORRPUT OVER TIME. THE DIFFERENCES IN IN BAV FOR MOONS PLACMENT FROM MOON AND GURU AND VENUS FROM MARS. THIS HAS VERY DEEP MEANING AND SAYING FOR EXAMPLE IF VENUS GETS POWER IF IN 4TH FROM MARS AND IF VENUS IS NOT GETTING POWER OR A BINDU IF IN 4TH FROM MARS HAS A BIG DIFFERENCE. THERE ARE ONLY 337 POINTS AND IT WOULD MEAN THAT IF AS IN THE CASE OF RAMESHES CHART IF HIS 7TH BHAVA GETS 19TH IT MEANS THAT THAT 1 BINDU OF FROM THE POOL OF 337 HAS GONE TO SOME OTHER HOUSE. IF A PLANET IS IN THAT HOUSE IT MAY GET 1 BINDU MORE STRENGTH AND IT MAY CHANGE THE ENTIRE CHART. IF THAT PLANET IS IN 4TH FROM A MALEFIC PLANET (BY MALEFIC I MEAN A PLANET WITH < 4 BINDUS EXCEPT MOON) AND IF THAT PLANET WERE TO GET STRNGTH THEN THAT PLANET WOULD BECOME VERY STRONG FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. THAT WOULD CHANGE THE ENTIRE COMPLEXION OF THE CHART. WITH ASKTAVARG WE ARE VERY PARTICULAR AND THIS IS NOT A TRIVIAL MATTER. 1 BINDUS CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. I said 19 Bindus as the chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that format. Varahamihira has exactly 8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is not a different system. He only has a different opinion about which places are influenced by Lagna in case of some of the planets. Parashara has, on the other hand, exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga. ASH : THIS IS NOT TRUE. BAV SCHEMES HAVE TO MATCH. I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BY SYSTEMS. THE CORE AND BASIC OF ASHTAKVARG SYSTEM IS THE BAV POINTS. IF PARASARA IS SAYING THAT MOON IS NOT GIVING STRENGTH TO 9TH BHAVA WHEAREAS VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING IT DOES. THIS IS HUGE DIFFERECE OUT HERE. SIMILARLY MOON IS BENEFIC IN 2ND FROM GURU AND VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING THAT 1 BINDUS STRENGTH IS NOT GIVEN. THIS IS THE BASIC. YOU JUST CANNOT SAY THAT THE DIFFERENCE OF OPINION IS "ONLY". THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING. IMAGINE A SYSTEM THAT IS USED ACCURATELY FOR TIMING OF EVENTS THE SAV VALUES FROM WHICH THE STRENGTH OF ALL PLANEST AND FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE IS COMPUTED AND ITS BASED ON SAV AND SAV IS BASED ON BAV. IN THE LEAST WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MIGHT SURMOUNT TO COMPOUNDING OF ERROR. ACTUALLY IF YOU STUDY HOW ONE COMES TO THE POINTS THAT I HAVE DISPLAYED IN MY PREVIOUS MAILS YOU WILL BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND WHY I AM SO PICKY WITH THIS DISTRIBUTION OF BAV AND STICKING TO VARHARAMIRA. IF WE DIFFER ON THIS VIEW WE CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE. I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than Guru in reply to Lakshmi. ASH : YES, I DID READ YOUR INTERSTING COMMENT BUT I WAS NOT CLEAR ON WHAT YOU MEANT BY STRONGER. STRONGER FOR WHAT EVENTS ? DID U MEAN STRONGER FOR DELIVERING RESULTS OR ALL 12 HOUSES. CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC. WHEN I GAVE THE POINTS I AM BEING VERY SPECIFIC AND COMPARING GURU WITH SHANI FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. I AM BEING SPECIFIC IN SAYING THAT IN GURU ANTRA RAMESH WILL HAVE MORE AUTHORITY AS COMPARED TO SHANI. GURU IS IN UPCAHYA FROM 10TH HOUSE AND WITH 5 BINDUS. SO ITS VERY EAGER TO GIVE 2ND AND 10TH HOUSE MATTERS. SHANI IS EAGER TO GIVE RESULTS FOR 12TH, 4TH, 11TH, AND 3RD HOUSE IN ITS ANTRA. CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC. I DO NOT THINK SHANI IS BAD FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND NEITHER IS GURU IN HIS ANTRA. AGAIN I AM RESTRICTING THE RESULTS TO THE ANTRA. I THINK IF U ARE MORE SPECIFIC THEN WE MIGHT BE SAYING THE SAME THING BUT FROM A DIFFERENT VIEW POINT. The reason it is not reflected in the table given by you is,as you have indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not considered in the system you are using. ASH : THIS IS INCORRECT. THE STRENGTH IS DERIVED FROM RASHI AND THE WORKSHEET POINTS ARE FROM RASHI ONLY. NAVAMSA HAS EQUAL STATUS AS COMPARED TO RASHI. WE USE NAVAMSA FOR FINDING OUT THE SAMDHARMIS AND ALSO DELAY. ALL COMBINATIONS HAVE TO BE CHECKED FROM BOTH RASI AND NAVAMSA. BUT FOR FINDING OUT THE STRENGH OF PLANET ITS DONE FROM RASI. A WORKSHEET FOR EACH DIVISIONAL CHART IS ALSO CASTED. Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the Navamsha placement of planets could also change. If you apply the strength from Navamsha as given in the chart provided by Lakshmi, you will see my view point. ASH : IT WILL NOT CHANGE THINGS. I CHECKED AFTER READING THIS COMMENT. IN BOTH CASES USING KRUSHNAS AYANAMSA AND LAHIRI SHANI REMAINS IN LIBRA IN NAVAMSA SO ITS SAMDHARMI TO VENUS. IT WILL REPLACE VENUS FOR THE HOUSE THAT VENUS IS UNABLE TO DELIVER RESULTS. THE POSITION OF MARS CHANGES IN LAGNA THOUGH. MAYBE IF U SEE THINGS WITH MARS BEING IN 12TH INSTEAD OF 11TH YOU MAY SEE MY VIEW POINT. AGAIN I AM EMPHASISING ON THE FACT THAT STRENGTH OR THE WORKSHEET THAT I GAVE IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI ONLY AND SAMDHARMIS IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI AND NAVAMSA. RASHI AND NAVAMSA HAVE EQUAL STATUS AS PER KAS AND WE FOLLOW CERTAIN RULES FOR FINDING DELAY. I HAVE DEMONSTRATED IN THIS MAIL REGARDING MARRIAGE OF RAMESH WITH LAKSHMI. FOR THAT I HAVE COMPUTED DELAY FOR MARRIAGE USING 2 ZEROES, AND SHANI ASPECTING PRIMIARY SIGNIFICATOR HOUSES FROM RASHI AND THEIR LORDS IN NAVAMSA AND USING WORKSHEET STRENGTH I HAVE COMPUTED THE TIME FRAME. IT WILL BE INTERSTING IF LAKSHMI CAN COMMENT ON THE SAME. THERE IS A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE IN THE WORKSHEET. SOME HOW IN HASTE MY AYANAMSA CHANGE BUT IT WILL NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR MARRAIGE. HERE IS THE CORRECTED VERSION OF THE WORKSHEET. MERCURY STILL HAS 18 POINTS FOR 7TH HOUSE AND MOSTLY ALL HOUSES. Hse SAV Pt Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 25 17 20 12 20 11 7 10 2 23 9 16 14 22 22 14 12 3 31 16 15 12 11 4 14 7 4 26 11 17 7 23 7 10 23 5 32 12 23 9 19 16 22 15 6 32 18 16 18 21 5 8 11 7 20 10 14 9 18 11 18 10 8 19 22 12 9 25 4 17 10 9 28 8 12 14 7 5 21 3 10 34 17 13 7 16 21 16 4 11 38 16 15 15 21 4 15 19 12 29 10 14 11 9 8 14 15 THANKING YOU, CHEERS !!! ASH Regards, Chandrashekhar. Ash wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi, There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ? I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware. In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis strength. The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use Varharmiras scheme ? To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house . Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart. These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following. 1) 4:10 2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration 3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus. 4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans. 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan 5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets 6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus 7) Adjustment of 6th lord. After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house. You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar dasha. I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time. Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give results for 10th house. If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani. At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru antra. House Signs SAV Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 1 Gemini 23 16 19 13 20 17 7 16 2 Cancer 24 10 15 20 23 23 14 16 3 Leo 30 9 21 9 19 11 11 13 4 Virgo 26 7 22 9 24 14 4 23 5 Libra 33 8 23 5 20 22 16 19 6 Scorpio 32 16 20 21 24 13 9 17 7 Sagittarius 20 7 19 5 25 17 12 8 8 Capricorn 21 15 19 9 24 9 12 12 9 Aquarius 29 7 17 13 11 14 22 9 10 Pisces 29 13 10 -2 17 22 9 7 11 Aries 40 11 21 10 26 14 10 19 12 Taurus 30 5 21 10 19 12 10 20 Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Ash, Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas. If you are talking about using other parameters in association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not constitute different system than Parashara. Regards, Chandrashekhar. ashsam73 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi Pardon me for my intervention. I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga. 1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house. 2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results effectively. Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events. A couple of points on Ramesh's chart. 1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify this antra. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Lakshmi, > I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not > only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house would it > not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated. > Chandrashekhar. > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > Namaste Chandrasekar ji, > > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this. > > > > Regards, > > Lakshmi > > > > > > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote: > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in > > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati > > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in own > > house. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > lakshmi ramesh wrote: > > > >> Om Gurave Namah > >> > >> Namaste Pradeep ji, > >> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th and > >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great > >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare > >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest > >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached to > >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever on > >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his work > >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire. Infact, > >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is > >> good for the general health & happiness of the person. > >> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my own > >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20 > >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage. > >> > >> I am posting the charts here. > >> > >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to > >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and > >> discussion. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lakshmi > >> > >> > >> > >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote: > >> > >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you > >> related to > >> guru in various bhavas. > >> > >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even when > >> in own > >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front. > >> > >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own > >> sign some > >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood. > >> > >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly. > >> > >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while > >> transiting > >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is > >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th > >> and 9th > >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general. > >> > >> Respect > >> Pradeep > >> > >> vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> <boxdel> > >> wrote: > >> > Dear Anuj, > >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your > >> message > >> to > >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to astrologers. > >> There are > >> many > >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity of the > >> dictum, I > >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier. > >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like > >> Benefic/Malefic > >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This happens more > >> with > >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with Deeksha > >> Guru as > >> his > >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara > >> telling > >> when > >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good and > >> pious > >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal feelings and > >> prejudices > >> > apart from application of astrological principles. > >> > Take care, > >> > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > >> > nameisego wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji. > >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru > >> in age > >> and > >> > > experience in this group. > >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right. > >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an article on " > >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was shown > >> Guru's > >> > > position in various houses which had been > >> destroyed/troubled by > >> Guru. > >> > > > >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva > >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih" > >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self. > >> > > > >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for > >> yourself and > >> > > check the examples that were given. > >> > > > >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter sucks the > >> goodness > >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects. Saturn > >> sucks the > >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it occupies. > >> > > > >> > > Tatvam-Asi > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan > >> <pnrazdan> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar, > >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter > >> still > >> > > further. > >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is a > >> designated as a > >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of > >> "Karka > >> Bhavo > >> > > Nasa" > >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is > >> placed in. > >> Why > >> > > this > >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing in Vedic > >> > > Astrology > >> > > > (in lighter vein). > >> > > > > >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not > >> given by > >> you. But > >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always > >> speaks > >> of > >> > > the > >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even > >> said, that > >> > > howsoever > >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the > >> subject. And > >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience. > >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for > >> convincing > >> > > all > >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly Brahiman. This > >> would > >> > > even > >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology. > >> > > > Pran Razdan > >> > > > > >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Dear Prafulla, > >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what > >> Shubhangi had > >> asked. > >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a dictum > >> given > >> by > >> > > sages > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the reason. If one > >> wants to > >> > > > > find > >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural zodiac > >> Leo is > >> in > >> > > 5th > >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava > >> Dasha. In > >> > > > > 11th > >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter who is > >> Shubha > >> > > there. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths > >> considered but > >> not > >> > > as > >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna. > >> > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred in > >> Leo for > >> > > > > Muhurta, > >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related > >> configurations),It may > >> > > not > >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily (generally > >> speaking). > >> > > In > >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have directional > >> strength > >> > > to > >> > > > > > initiate for results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to > >> give > >> > > negative > >> > > > > > results. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > >> > > > > <boxdel> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi, > >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter looses his > >> > > strength in > >> > > > > > Leo > >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for > >> marriages when > >> > > Jupiter > >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha. That > >> is due > >> to > >> > > the > >> > > > > > fact of > >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun > >> being in > >> own > >> > > Rasi > >> > > > > > makes > >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with > >> Father. But > >> I > >> > > would > >> > > > > > say he > >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession. > >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am > >> curious > >> to > >> > > know > >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength in leo > >> and > >> hence > >> > > this > >> > > > > > email. > >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's case also. > >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no > >> doubt he > >> is very > >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in academics > >> and yes, > >> he > >> > > did > >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class. > >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason to > >> be the > >> > > > > positioning > >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know > >> why jup > >> > > losses > >> > > > > > strength in leo. > >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both > >> father > >> > > and > >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other. > >> > > > > > > >Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote : > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira, > >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it not? > >> > > > > > > >>Regards, > >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar. > >> > > > > > > >> > >& Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.