Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

2nd house Jup in various roles--to Chandrashekhar on Ashtakvarg

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi

 

Pardon me for my intervention.

 

I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.

 

1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With

Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.

 

2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly.

They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural

nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like

Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the

planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they

receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house

and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu

will act more like Mercury.

 

3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign

placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the

sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to

find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and

total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time

results effectively.

 

Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not

complete and may lead to confusion.

 

Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.

 

A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.

 

1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by

Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th.

 

2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh

might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to

make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify

this antra.

 

 

Thanking you,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel>

wrote:

> Dear Lakshmi,

> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He

not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a

trine

> lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides

being

> placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and

11th

> in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as

more

> powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with

> greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra

> associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house

would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets,

before

> coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga

then

> SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19

> points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with

> Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of

nodes ,

> neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation

> weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> lakshmi ramesh wrote:

>

> > Om Gurave Namah

> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,

> >

> > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona.

Please

> > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more empowered

to

> > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality,

Jupiter

> > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Lakshmi

> >

> >

> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lakshmi,

> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and

in

> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana

rakshati

> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he is in

own

> > house.

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:

> >

> >> Om Gurave Namah

> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,

> >>

> >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th

and

> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with

great

> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare

> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the

finest

> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very attached

to

> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what so ever

on

> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in his

work

> >> environment and has all the comforts one could desire.

Infact,

> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna, which is

> >> good for the general health & happiness of the person.

> >>

> >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my

own

> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20

> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage.

> >>

> >> I am posting the charts here.

> >>

> >> I request that you also post the charts of the individuals to

> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our edification and

> >> discussion.

> >>

> >> Regards,

> >> Lakshmi

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote:

> >>

> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >>

> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you

> >> related to

> >> guru in various bhavas.

> >>

> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for siblings.Even

when

> >> in own

> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front.

> >>

> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in

own

> >> sign some

> >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood.

> >>

> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.

> >>

> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not favourable while

> >> transiting

> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra

is

> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only

2nd,5th,7th

> >> and 9th

> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in

general.

> >>

> >> Respect

> >> Pradeep

> >>

> >> vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar

> >> <boxdel>

> >> wrote:

> >> > Dear Anuj,

> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in

your

> >> message

> >> to

> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to

astrologers.

> >> There are

> >> many

> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the veracity

of the

> >> dictum, I

> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.

> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up terms like

> >> Benefic/Malefic

> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give. This

happens more

> >> with

> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it with

Deeksha

> >> Guru as

> >> his

> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget

Parashara

> >> telling

> >> when

> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute only good

and

> >> pious

> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal

feelings and

> >> prejudices

> >> > apart from application of astrological principles.

> >> > Take care,

> >> > Chandrashekhar.

> >> >

> >> > nameisego wrote:

> >> >

> >> > >

> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.

> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most

Guru

> >> in age

> >> and

> >> > > experience in this group.

> >> > > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right.

> >> > > Self had posted in this group and elsewhere an

article on "

> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back where it was

shown

> >> Guru's

> >> > > position in various houses which had been

> >> destroyed/troubled by

> >> Guru.

> >> > >

> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva

> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"

> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.

> >> > >

> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read

for

> >> yourself and

> >> > > check the examples that were given.

> >> > >

> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter

sucks the

> >> goodness

> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it aspects.

Saturn

> >> sucks the

> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the house it

occupies.

> >> > >

> >> > > Tatvam-Asi

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > vedic astrology, PNRazdan

> >> <pnrazdan>

> >> > > wrote:

> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > You seem to be extending your arguments against

Jupiter

> >> still

> >> > > further.

> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub in houses it is

a

> >> designated as a

> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle

of

> >> "Karka

> >> Bhavo

> >> > > Nasa"

> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm every house it is

> >> placed in.

> >> Why

> >> > > this

> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of millions believing

in Vedic

> >> > > Astrology

> >> > > > (in lighter vein).

> >> > > >

> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a sage, source was not

> >> given by

> >> you. But

> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It

always

> >> speaks

> >> of

> >> > > the

> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter. Somewhere it is even

> >> said, that

> >> > > howsoever

> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help

the

> >> subject. And

> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience.

> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more

hardwork for

> >> convincing

> >> > > all

> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly

Brahiman. This

> >> would

> >> > > even

> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology.

> >> > > > Pran Razdan

> >> > > >

> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:

> >> > > >

> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,

> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with what

> >> Shubhangi had

> >> asked.

> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he is placed in is a

dictum

> >> given

> >> by

> >> > > sages

> >> > > > > and

> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to find out the

reason. If one

> >> wants to

> >> > > > > find

> >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this in natural

zodiac

> >> Leo is

> >> in

> >> > > 5th

> >> > > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to

Karaka Bhava

> >> Dasha. In

> >> > > > > 11th

> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it is not only Jupiter

who is

> >> Shubha

> >> > > there.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst many strengths

> >> considered but

> >> not

> >> > > as

> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna.

> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be

preferred in

> >> Leo for

> >> > > > > Muhurta,

> >> > > > > > I do not know much about muhurta related

> >> configurations),It may

> >> > > not

> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of Bala necessarily

(generally

> >> speaking).

> >> > > In

> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is

considered bad.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will have

directional

> >> strength

> >> > > to

> >> > > > > > initiate for results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for

jupiter to

> >> give

> >> > > negative

> >> > > > > > results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> > > > > <boxdel>

> >> > > > > > wrote:

> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,

> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you must know that Jupiter

looses his

> >> > > strength in

> >> > > > > > Leo

> >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for

> >> marriages when

> >> > > Jupiter

> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as Simhastha.

That

> >> is due

> >> to

> >> > > the

> >> > > > > > fact of

> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's case Sun

> >> being in

> >> own

> >> > > Rasi

> >> > > > > > makes

> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with

> >> Father. But

> >> I

> >> > > would

> >> > > > > > say he

> >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession.

> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik wrote:

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but

I am

> >> curious

> >> to

> >> > > know

> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter losing its strength

in leo

> >> and

> >> hence

> >> > > this

> >> > > > > > email.

> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in my brother's

case also.

> >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no

> >> doubt he

> >> is very

> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not do much well in

academics

> >> and yes,

> >> he

> >> > > did

> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th class.

> >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I thought the reason

to

> >> be the

> >> > > > > positioning

> >> > > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to

know

> >> why jup

> >> > > losses

> >> > > > > > strength in leo.

> >> > > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in

8th, both

> >> father

> >> > > and

> >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each other.

> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,

> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,

> >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it

not?

> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,

> >> > > > > > > >>Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna BCS wrote:

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>>Dear Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>>In your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses

> >> strength

> >> in Leo.

> >> > > > > Any

> >> > > > > > problems

> >> > > > > > > >>>>in education?

> >> > > > > > > >>>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>No, except for one year I didn't study and

> >> failed.

> >> That

> >> > > was in

> >> > > > > > 1986-87, my

> >> > > > > > > >>>first year of university. Interesting, I

get

> >> Vimshottari

> >> > > Ven-

> >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and

> >> > > > > > > >>>Sat for that year.

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>Yours,

> >> > > > > > > >>>Dhira Krsna dasa,

> >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi

> >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com

> >> <http://www.radhadesh.com/>

> >> > > > > > >

>>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Archives: vedic-

astrology

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> >> > > astrology/info.html

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

> >> > > > > vedic astrology-

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

> >> Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * Sponsor*

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > click here

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > >

> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011

> >> 7

> >> > >

> >>

6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6

> >> /

> >> > > *http://companion.

<http://companion./>>

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >> ------------------------

------

> >> -----

> >> > > ----

> >> > > > > > * Links*

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > *

> >> > > > > > vedic-

astrology/

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * To from this group, send an

email to:

> >> > > > > > vedic astrology-

 

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > <vedic astrology-

?

> >> > > subject=Un>

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * Your use of is subject to

the

> >>

> >> Terms

> >> > > of

> >> > > > > > Service

<>.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > > _______________________________

> >> > > >

> >> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

> >> > > > http://vote. <http://vote./>

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > Archives: vedic-

astrology

> >> > >

> >> > > Group info: vedic-

> >> astrology/info.html

> >> > >

> >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> >>

> >> > >

> >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >> > >

> >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > * Sponsor*

> >> > >

> >> > > click here

> >> > >

> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011

> >>

76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf

> >> 6/*http://companion.

<http://companion./>>

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> ------------------------

--------

> >> -------

> >> > > * Links*

> >> > >

> >> > > *

> >> > > vedic astrology/

> >> > >

> >> > > * To from this group, send an email

to:

> >> > > vedic astrology

> >> > > <vedic astrology-

?

> >> subject=Un>

> >> > >

> >> > > * Your use of is subject to the

 

> >> Terms of

> >> > > Service <>.

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Group info:

> >> vedic astrology/info.html

> >>

> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

> >> vedic astrology-

> >>

> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> ----------------------------

-----------

> >>

> >> Mail Address AutoComplete

> >>

<http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*http://promotions..

com/new_mail/static/ease.html>

> >> - You start. We finish.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> >>

> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >>

> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> > vote. <http://vote.> - Register online to vote

today!

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > * Sponsor*

> >

> > click here

> >

<http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117

6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/

*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298>

> >

> >

> >

> >

------

> > * Links*

> >

> > *

> > vedic astrology/

> >

> > *

> > vedic astrology

> > <vedic astrology?

subject=Un>

> >

> > * Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash,

Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there

however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any

Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas

based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects

received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which

system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given

in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.

If you are talking about using other parameters in association with

Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not

constitute different system than Parashara.

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

ashsam73 wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi

Pardon me for my intervention.

I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.

1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With

Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.

2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly.

They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural

nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like

Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the

planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they

receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house

and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu

will act more like Mercury.

3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign

placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the

sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to

find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and

total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time

results effectively.

Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not

complete and may lead to confusion.

Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.

A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.

1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by

Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th.

2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh

might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to

make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify

this antra.

Thanking you,

Cheers !!!

Ash

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar

<boxdel>

wrote:

> Dear Lakshmi,

> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He

not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a

trine

> lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides

being

> placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and

11th

> in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as

more

> powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with

> greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra

> associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house

would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets,

before

> coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga

then

> SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19

> points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with

> Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of

nodes ,

> neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation

> weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> lakshmi ramesh wrote:

>

> > Om Gurave Namah

> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,

> >

> > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona.

Please

> > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more

empowered

to

> > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality,

Jupiter

> > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Lakshmi

> >

> >

> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lakshmi,

> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house

and

in

> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana

rakshati

> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he

is in

own

> > house.

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:

> >

> >> Om Gurave Namah

> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,

> >>

> >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru

in 4th

and

> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual

with

great

> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and

a rare

> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one

of the

finest

> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very

attached

to

> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what

so ever

on

> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in

his

work

> >> environment and has all the comforts one could

desire.

Infact,

> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna,

which is

> >> good for the general health & happiness of the

person.

> >>

> >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th

(Dhanus) is my

own

> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for

nearly 20

> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after

marriage.

> >>

> >> I am posting the charts here.

> >>

> >> I request that you also post the charts of the

individuals to

> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our

edification and

> >> discussion.

> >>

> >> Regards,

> >> Lakshmi

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/*

wrote:

> >>

> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >>

> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught

by you

> >> related to

> >> guru in various bhavas.

> >>

> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for

siblings.Even

when

> >> in own

> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home

front.

> >>

> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and

not in

own

> >> sign some

> >> physical weakness and health problems in

childhood.

> >>

> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.

> >>

> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not

favourable while

> >> transiting

> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th

kendra

is

> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only

2nd,5th,7th

> >> and 9th

> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in

general.

> >>

> >> Respect

> >> Pradeep

> >>

> >> vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> <boxdel>

> >> wrote:

> >> > Dear Anuj,

> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly

said in

your

> >> message

> >> to

> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to

astrologers.

> >> There are

> >> many

> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the

veracity

of the

> >> dictum, I

> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.

> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up

terms like

> >> Benefic/Malefic

> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give.

This

happens more

> >> with

> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it

with

Deeksha

> >> Guru as

> >> his

> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to

forget

Parashara

> >> telling

> >> when

> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute

only good

and

> >> pious

> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my

personal

feelings and

> >> prejudices

> >> > apart from application of astrological

principles.

> >> > Take care,

> >> > Chandrashekhar.

> >> >

> >> > nameisego wrote:

> >> >

> >> > >

> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.

> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the

senior most

Guru

> >> in age

> >> and

> >> > > experience in this group.

> >> > > Your observation about Guru is

absolutely right.

> >> > > Self had posted in this group and

elsewhere an

article on "

> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back

where it was

shown

> >> Guru's

> >> > > position in various houses which had

been

> >> destroyed/troubled by

> >> Guru.

> >> > >

> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva

> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"

> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.

> >> > >

> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older

postings and read

for

> >> yourself and

> >> > > check the examples that were given.

> >> > >

> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn

is, Jupiter

sucks the

> >> goodness

> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it

aspects.

Saturn

> >> sucks the

> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the

house it

occupies.

> >> > >

> >> > > Tatvam-Asi

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > vedic astrology,

PNRazdan

> >> <pnrazdan>

> >> > > wrote:

> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > You seem to be extending your

arguments against

Jupiter

> >> still

> >> > > further.

> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub

in houses it is

a

> >> designated as a

> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based

on the principle

of

> >> "Karka

> >> Bhavo

> >> > > Nasa"

> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm

every house it is

> >> placed in.

> >> Why

> >> > > this

> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of

millions believing

in Vedic

> >> > > Astrology

> >> > > > (in lighter vein).

> >> > > >

> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a

sage, source was not

> >> given by

> >> you. But

> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient

astrology. It

always

> >> speaks

> >> of

> >> > > the

> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter.

Somewhere it is even

> >> said, that

> >> > > howsoever

> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will

still try to help

the

> >> subject. And

> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our

experience.

> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do

some more

hardwork for

> >> convincing

> >> > > all

> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the

heavenly

Brahiman. This

> >> would

> >> > > even

> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic

Astrology.

> >> > > > Pran Razdan

> >> > > >

> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar

<boxdel> wrote:

> >> > > >

> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,

> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in

connection with what

> >> Shubhangi had

> >> asked.

> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he

is placed in is a

dictum

> >> given

> >> by

> >> > > sages

> >> > > > > and

> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to

find out the

reason. If one

> >> wants to

> >> > > > > find

> >> > > > > the reason about Leo,

consider this in natural

zodiac

> >> Leo is

> >> in

> >> > > 5th

> >> > > > > house whose occupation by

Jupiter leads to

Karaka Bhava

> >> Dasha. In

> >> > > > > 11th

> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it

is not only Jupiter

who is

> >> Shubha

> >> > > there.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst

many strengths

> >> considered but

> >> not

> >> > > as

> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter

gets that in Lagna.

> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > In my humble view,

(Jupiter may not be

preferred in

> >> Leo for

> >> > > > > Muhurta,

> >> > > > > > I do not know much about

muhurta related

> >> configurations),It may

> >> > > not

> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of

Bala necessarily

(generally

> >> speaking).

> >> > > In

> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd

house in Libra is

considered bad.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house

(any sign) will have

directional

> >> strength

> >> > > to

> >> > > > > > initiate for results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > There must be more than

this reason, for

jupiter to

> >> give

> >> > > negative

> >> > > > > > results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> > > > > <boxdel>

> >> > > > > > wrote:

> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,

> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you

must know that Jupiter

looses his

> >> > > strength in

> >> > > > > > Leo

> >> > > > > > > and that is why

there are no Muhurtas for

> >> marriages when

> >> > > Jupiter

> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or

what is called as Simhastha.

That

> >> is due

> >> to

> >> > > the

> >> > > > > > fact of

> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala.

In your brother's case Sun

> >> being in

> >> own

> >> > > Rasi

> >> > > > > > makes

> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and

therefore good relations with

> >> Father. But

> >> I

> >> > > would

> >> > > > > > say he

> >> > > > > > > would not follow

father's profession.

> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik

wrote:

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for

intervening in your session, but

I am

> >> curious

> >> to

> >> > > know

> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter

losing its strength

in leo

> >> and

> >> hence

> >> > > this

> >> > > > > > email.

> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your

dictum worked in my brother's

case also.

> >> > > > > > > >My brother has

sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no

> >> doubt he

> >> is very

> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not

do much well in

academics

> >> and yes,

> >> he

> >> > > did

> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th

class.

> >> > > > > > > >With my half

knowledge I thought the reason

to

> >> be the

> >> > > > > positioning

> >> > > > > > of both the planets in

8th, but now curious to

know

> >> why jup

> >> > > losses

> >> > > > > > strength in leo.

> >> > > > > > > >But though both

planets are positioned in

8th, both

> >> father

> >> > > and

> >> > > > > > son shares good relation

with each other.

> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,

> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep

2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,

> >> > > > > > > >>There you

see the dictum working. Is it

not?

> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,

> >> > > > > > >

>>Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna

BCS wrote:

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >> > > > > > > >>>Dear

Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>>In

your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses

> >> strength

> >> in Leo.

> >> > > > > Any

> >> > > > > > problems

> >> > > > > > > >>>>in

education?

> >> > > > > > > >>>>

> >> > > > > > >

>>>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>No,

except for one year I didn't study and

> >> failed.

> >> That

> >> > > was in

> >> > > > > > 1986-87, my

> >> > > > > > > >>>first

year of university. Interesting, I

get

> >> Vimshottari

> >> > > Ven-

> >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and

> >> > > > > > > >>>Sat for

that year.

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>Yours,

> >> > > > > > > >>>Dhira

Krsna dasa,

> >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi

> >> > > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com

> >> <http://www.radhadesh.com/>

> >> > > > > > >

>>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >>>

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Archives: vedic-

astrology

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> >> > > astrology/info.html

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to

> >> > > > >

vedic astrology-

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's

light shine on us .......

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

Sarvam Sri

> >> Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * Sponsor*

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > click here

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > >

> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011

> >> 7

> >> > >

> >>

6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6

> >> /

> >> > > *http://companion.

<http://companion./>>

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >>

------------------------

------

> >> -----

> >> > > ----

> >> > > > > > * Links*

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * To visit your

group on the web, go to:

> >> > > > > > vedic-

astrology/

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * To

from this group, send an

email to:

> >> > > > > > vedic astrology-

 

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > <vedic astrology-

?

> >> > > subject=Un>

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > * Your use of

Groups is subject to

the

> >>

> >> Terms

> >> > > of

> >> > > > > > Service

<>.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > >

> >> > > > _______________________________

> >> > > >

> >> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online

to vote today!

> >> > > > http://vote.

<http://vote./>

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > Archives: vedic-

astrology

> >> > >

> >> > > Group info: vedic-

> >> astrology/info.html

> >> > >

> >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

vedic astrology-

> >>

> >> > >

> >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us

........

> >> > >

> >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > * Sponsor*

> >> > >

> >> > > click here

> >> > >

> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011

> >>

76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf

> >> 6/*http://companion.

<http://companion./>>

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >>

------------------------

--------

> >> -------

> >> > > * Links*

> >> > >

> >> > > * To visit your group on the web,

go to:

> >> > > vedic astrology/

> >> > >

> >> > > * To from this group,

send an email

to:

> >> > >

vedic astrology

> >> > > <vedic astrology-

?

> >> subject=Un>

> >> > >

> >> > > * Your use of is

subject to the

 

> >> Terms of

> >> > > Service <>.

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Group info:

> >> vedic astrology/info.html

> >>

> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

> >> vedic astrology-

> >>

> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >>

> >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >>

> >>

> >>

----------------------------

-----------

> >>

> >> Mail Address AutoComplete

> >>

<http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*http://promotions..

com/new_mail/static/ease.html>

> >> - You start. We finish.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> >>

> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >>

> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >>

> >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

 

------

> >

> > vote. <http://vote.>

- Register online to vote

today!

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > * Sponsor*

> >

> > click here

> >

<http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117

6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/

*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298>

> >

> >

> >

> >

 

------

> > * Links*

> >

> > *

> > vedic astrology/

> >

> > *

> > vedic astrology

> > <vedic astrology?

subject=Un>

> >

> > *

Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> >

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19

bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger

than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one

other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a

favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ?

I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware.

In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each

and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting

the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis

strength.

The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV

distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in

JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you

use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would

be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV

or generally use Varharmiras scheme ?

To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house .

 

Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart.

 

These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following.

 

1) 4:10

2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration

3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus.

4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans.

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets

6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus

7) Adjustment of 6th lord.

 

After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each

planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d

charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit

sthan for each and every house.

 

You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and

Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar

dasha.

 

I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually

parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time.

 

Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also

Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give

results for 10th house.

 

If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and

Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that

Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani.

At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare

the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru

antra.

 

 

House

Signs

SAV

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

Gemini

23

16

19

13

20

17

7

16

2

Cancer

24

10

15

20

23

23

14

16

3

Leo

30

9

21

9

19

11

11

13

4

Virgo

26

7

22

9

24

14

4

23

5

Libra

33

8

23

5

20

22

16

19

6

Scorpio

32

16

20

21

24

13

9

17

7

Sagittarius

20

7

19

5

25

17

12

8

8

Capricorn

21

15

19

9

24

9

12

12

9

Aquarius

29

7

17

13

11

14

22

9

10

Pisces

29

13

10

-2

17

22

9

7

11

Aries

40

11

21

10

26

14

10

19

12

Taurus

30

5

21

10

19

12

10

20

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Dear Ash,Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there

however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga

system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a

native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and

association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to

and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or

reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.If you are talking about using other parameters in

association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and

would not constitute different system than

Parashara.Regards,Chandrashekhar.ashsam73 wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and LakshmiPardon me for my intervention.I would like to

comment on Ashtakavarga.1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV.

With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.2) For nodes

are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to

sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in

numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will

be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points

they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd

house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like

Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on

Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a

proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not

used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total

strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results

effectively.Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is

not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective

tool in timing of events.A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.1) In Ramesh's

chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars

to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have

been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and

accumulation of wealth.

Lakshami can verify this antra.Thanking you,Cheers !!!Ash--- In

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> Dear

Lakshmi,> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord.

He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a

trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in

3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even

if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is

only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking

about 7th house would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming

to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would

rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I

give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is

Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider

house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be

appreciated.> Chandrashekhar.> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> > > Om Gurave Namah> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,> > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own

house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who

is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and

functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I

request you to ponder on this.> > > > Regards,> > Lakshmi> > > >> >

*/Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:> >> > Dear Lakshmi,> > If I may

point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in> > Ramesh's case

Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati> > Mandah. Guru's

exception to house damage occurs when he is in own> > house.> >

Chandrashekhar.> >> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> >> >> Om Gurave Namah> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,>

>> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th

and> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great> >>

knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare> >> inner

harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest> >> individuals

I have ever come across, and he is very attached to> >> his family and

mother and there are no problems what so ever on> >> the home front. This

individual is highly esteemed in his work> >> environment and has all the

comforts one could desire. Infact,> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast

sukhargala on

lagna, which is> >> good for the general health & happiness of the person.>

>> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my

own> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20> >>

years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage.> >> > >> I

am posting the charts here.> >> > >> I request that you also post the

charts of the individuals to> >> whom you were referring in your post, for

our edification and> >> discussion.> >> >

>> Regards,> >> Lakshmi > >> > >>> >>> >> */vijayadas_pradeep

<vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote:> >>> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >>>

>> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you> >>

related to> >> guru in various bhavas.> >>> >> When in 3rd

always some difficulties for siblings.Even when> >> in own>

>> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front.> >>> >>

When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own> >> sign

some> >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood.> >>> >>

Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.> >>> >> Also sages have

advised that Guru is not favourable while> >> transiting> >>

kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is> >>

beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th> >> and 9th>

>> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general.> >>> >>

Respect> >> Pradeep> >>> >> --- In

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> <boxdel>> >>

wrote:> >> > Dear Anuj,>

>> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your> >>

message> >> to> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known

to astrologers.> >> There are> >> many> >> > shlokas to

that effects and charts prove the veracity of the> >> dictum, I> >>

> have myself posted a few of them earlier.> >> > Unfortunately there

is a tendency to mix up terms like>

>> Benefic/Malefic> >> > with the results a planet is likely to

give. This happens more> >> with> >> > Jupiter as people

usually tend to equate it with Deeksha> >> Guru as> >> his> >>

> name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara> >>

telling> >> when> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to

attribute only good and>

>> pious> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal

feelings and> >> prejudices> >> > apart from application of

astrological principles.> >> > Take care,> >> >

Chandrashekhar.> >> >> >> > nameisego wrote:> >> >> >>

> >> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.>

>> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru> >>

in age> >> and> >> > > experience in this group.> >>

> > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right.> >> > > Self had

posted in this group and elsewhere an article on "> >> > > "Guru Boon

or Bane??" some time back where it was shown> >> Guru's> >> > >

position in various houses which had been>

>> destroyed/troubled by> >> Guru.> >> > >> >> >

> "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"> >>

> > This Dictum had been proved by self.> >> > >> >> > > You

may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for> >> yourself and>

>> > > check the examples that were given.>

>> > >> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter

sucks the> >> goodness> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to

houses it aspects. Saturn> >> sucks the> >> > > houses he

aspects and increases the house it occupies.> >> > >> >> > >

Tatvam-Asi> >> > >> >> > >>

>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >

vedic astrology, PNRazdan> >> <pnrazdan>>

>> > > wrote:> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,> >> > > >

You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter>

>> still> >> > > further.> >> > > > Firstly you said

that Jup is ashub in houses it is a> >> designated as a> >> > >

> Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of> >> "Karka> >>

Bhavo> >> > > Nasa"> >> > > > . Now you say that it will

harm every house it is> >> placed in.> >>

Why> >> > > this> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of

millions believing in Vedic> >> > > Astrology> >> > > > (in

lighter vein).> >> > > >> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of

a sage, source was not> >> given by> >> you. But> >> >

> > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always> >> speaks>

>> of> >> > > the> >> > > > benefic qualities of

Jupiter. Somewhere it is even> >> said, that> >> > > howsoever>

>> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the> >>

subject. And> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience.>

>> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for> >>

convincing>

>> > > all> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly

Brahiman. This> >> would> >> > > even> >> > > > mean a

paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology.> >> > > > Pran Razdan> >> >

> >> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> >> > >

>> >> >

> > > Dear Prafulla,> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with

what> >> Shubhangi had> >> asked.> >> > > > > Jupiter

harming the house he is placed in is a dictum> >> given> >> by>

>> > > sages> >> > > > > and> >> > > > > there is no

reason to try to find out the reason. If one> >> wants to>

>> > > > > find> >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this

in natural zodiac> >> Leo is> >> in> >> > > 5th> >>

> > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava> >>

Dasha. In> >> > > > > 11th> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha

so it is not only Jupiter who is> >> Shubha>

>> > > there.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Disha strength is

one amongst many strengths> >> considered but> >> not> >>

> > as> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna.>

>> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > >> >> > > > >

Prafulla Gang wrote:>

>> > > > >> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >> > >

> > >> >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred

in> >> Leo for> >> > > > > Muhurta,> >> > > > > > I do

not know much about muhurta related> >> configurations),It may> >>

> > not> >> > > > > > become weak in

terms of Bala necessarily (generally> >> speaking).> >> > > In>

>> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad.> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will

have directional> >> strength> >> > > to> >> > > > > >

initiate for results.> >> > > > > >>

>> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to> >>

give> >> > > negative> >> > > > > > results.> >> > >

> > >> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang> >> > > > > >> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar> >> > > > > <boxdel>> >> > > > > > wrote:>

>> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian

you must know that Jupiter looses his> >> > > strength in> >> >

> > > > Leo> >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for>

>> marriages when>

>> > > Jupiter> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as

Simhastha. That> >> is due> >> to> >> > > the> >>

> > > > > fact of> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's

case Sun> >> being in> >> own> >> > > Rasi> >>

> > > > >

makes> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with> >>

Father. But> >> I> >> > > would> >> > > > > > say

he> >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession.> >> >

> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >

Shubhangi Naik wrote:> >> >

> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,> >> > > > > > > >> >>

> > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am> >>

curious> >> to> >> > > know> >> > > > > > the logic

behind jupiter losing its strength in leo> >> and> >> hence> >>

> > this>

>> > > > > > email.> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in

my brother's case also.> >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo

but in 8th, no> >> doubt he> >> is very> >> > > > > >

intelligent but did not do much well in academics> >> and yes,> >>

he> >> > > did> >> > > > > > fail

once in his 10th class.> >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I

thought the reason to> >> be the> >> > > > > positioning> >>

> > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know> >>

why jup> >> > > losses> >> > > > > > strength in leo.> >>

> > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both> >>

father>

>> > > and> >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each

other.> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi> >>

> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >>

> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > >

> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :>

>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >

>>Dear Dhira,> >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it

not?> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,> >> > > > > > >

>>Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > > >>>

>> > > > > > > >>Dhira Krsna BCS wrote:> >> > > > > > > >>> >>

> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>>Dear

Chandrashekhar,> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >>

> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >

>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>In your case it is in Leo. Jupiter looses> >>

strength> >> in Leo.> >> > > > > Any> >> > > > > >

problems> >> > > > > > > >>>>in education?> >> > > > > > >

>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>

>> > > > > > > >>>No, except for one year I didn't study and> >>

failed.> >> That> >> > > was in> >> > > > > > 1986-87,

my> >> > > > > > > >>>first year of university. Interesting, I get> >>

Vimshottari> >> > > Ven-> >> > > > > > Rahu-Jup and> >>

> > > > > > >>>Sat

for that year.> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>Yours,> >>

> > > > > > >>>Dhira Krsna dasa,> >> > > > > > > >>>Jyotishi> >>

> > > > > > >>>http://www.radhadesh.com> >>

<http://www.radhadesh.com/>> >> > > > > > >

>>>http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html> >> > > > > > > >>>>

>> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >

> >>>> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >

> >> >> > > > > >>

>> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Archives:

vedic astrology> >> > > > > >> >>

> > > > > Group info: vedic-> >> > >

astrology/info.html> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE:

Blank mail to>

>> > > > > vedic astrology-> >> > > > >

>> >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> >>

Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>

>> > > > > > * Sponsor*> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > click here> >> > > > > >> >>

> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129icjvds/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011> >>

7> >>

> >> >>

6/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095452957/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6> >>

/> >> > > *http://companion. <http://companion./>>>

>> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >

> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >>

>> > > >> >>

------------------------------> >>

-----> >> > > ----> >> > > > > > * Links*> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > * >

>> > > > > > vedic astrology/>

>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * To from this

group, send an email to:> >> > > > > >

vedic astrology> >> > > > > > > >>

> > > >> >> > > >

<vedic astrology?> >> > >

subject=Un>> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > *

Your use of is subject to the> >> > >>

Terms> >> > > of> >> > > > > > Service

<>.> >> > > > >

>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >>

>> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >

_______________________________> >> > > > > >> >

> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!> >> > > >

http://vote. <http://vote./>> >> > >> >> > >>

>> > >> >> > > Archives:

vedic astrology> >> > >> >> > >

Group info: vedic-> >>

astrology/info.html> >> > >>

>> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >>

> >> > >> >> > > ....... May Jupiter's

light shine on us .......> >> > >> >> > > || Om Tat Sat ||

Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > >> >> > >> >>

> > * Sponsor*>

>> > > > >> > > click here> >> > >> >>

<http://us.ard./SIG=129n0568s/M=295196.4901138.6071305.30011> >>

76/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095571130/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf> >>

6/*http://companion. <http://companion./>>> >> >

>> >> > >>

>> > >> >> > >> >>

--------------------------------> >>

-------> >> > > * Links*> >> > >> >> > >

* > >> > >

vedic astrology/> >> > >

> >> > > * > >>

> > vedic astrology> >> > >

<vedic astrology?> >>

subject=Un>> >> > > > >> >

> * > >> Terms of>

>> > > Service <>.> >> >

>> >> > >> >>> >>> >>> >> Archives:

vedic astrology> >>> >> Group info:> >>

vedic astrology/info.html> >>> >> To

UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> >> vedic astrology->

>>> >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >>> >>

> >>> >>> >>

------> >>

> >>

Mail Address AutoComplete> >>

<http://us.rd./mail_us/taglines/aac/*/static/ease.html>>

>> - You start. We finish.> >>> >> Archives:

vedic astrology> >>> >> Group info:

vedic astrology/info.html> >>> >> To

UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >>> >>

........ May Jupiter's light shine on us

........> >>> >> >

>>> >>> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >>

> Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> >> >

> >> >

....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat ||

Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu

||> >> >> >

------> > Do

you ?> > vote. <http://vote.> - Register online to vote

today!> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group

info: vedic astrology/info.html> >> > To

UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >> >

> >> > || Om Tat Sat ||

Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> >> >

* Sponsor*> > > > click here > >

<http://us.ard./SIG=129uipm0f/M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1095719721/A=2352667/R=0/SIG=11t4iivpf/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60185359&partid=5285298>

> >> >> >> >

------> >

* Links*> >> > * > >

vedic astrology/> > > > * To

 

from this group, send an email to:> >

vedic astrology> >

<vedic astrology?subject=Un>> >

> > * Terms of> >

Service <>.> >> >Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash,

I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case

you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a

combination of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system.

There is no harm in using it as long as results come true. However it

is not a different Ashtakavarga system per se. I was talking about a

different Ashtakavarga system that you had suggested exists.

Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no doubt

yet it is only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one more

bindu of influence for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might not

mean that other planet is getting a bindu less.I said 19 Bindus as the

chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that format. Varahamihira has exactly

8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is not a different system. He only

has a different opinion about which places are influenced by Lagna in

case of some of the planets. Parashara has, on the other hand,

exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga.

I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than Guru in

reply to Lakshmi. The reason it is not reflected in the table given by

you is,as you have indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not

considered in the system you are using. Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the

Navamsha placement of planets could also change. If you apply the

strength from Navamsha as given in the chart provided by Lakshmi, you

will see my view point.

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

Ash wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi,

There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a

house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with

20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a

bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu

less.

It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one

house and not with another. Is it not ?

I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware.

In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each

planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16

divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not

considered in the D charts only the basis strength.

The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become

corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The

settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check

boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you

will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if

you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use

Varharmiras scheme ?

To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each

house .

 

Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart.

 

These are total strength of the planets and derived by

considering the following.

 

1) 4:10

2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th

lord from house under consideration

3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration

with > 4 bindus.

4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal

and phalit sthans.

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets

6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus

7) Adjustment of 6th lord.

 

After meticulously considering all these factors we come to

strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also

compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the

strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house.

 

You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can

see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their

results in their respective antar dasha.

 

I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from

parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become

corrupt over time.

 

Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th

house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so

its very eager to give results for 10th house.

 

If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for

10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big

difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the

antras of Guru and Shani.

At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and

shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in

shani compared to Guru antra.

 

 

House

Signs

SAV

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

Gemini

23

16

19

13

20

17

7

16

2

Cancer

24

10

15

20

23

23

14

16

3

Leo

30

9

21

9

19

11

11

13

4

Virgo

26

7

22

9

24

14

4

23

5

Libra

33

8

23

5

20

22

16

19

6

Scorpio

32

16

20

21

24

13

9

17

7

Sagittarius

20

7

19

5

25

17

12

8

8

Capricorn

21

15

19

9

24

9

12

12

9

Aquarius

29

7

17

13

11

14

22

9

10

Pisces

29

13

10

-2

17

22

9

7

11

Aries

40

11

21

10

26

14

10

19

12

Taurus

30

5

21

10

19

12

10

20

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Dear

Ash,

Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there

however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any

Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas

based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects

received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which

system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given

in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.

If you are talking about using other parameters in association with

Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not

constitute different system than Parashara.

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

ashsam73 wrote:

Dear

Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi

Pardon me for my intervention.

I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.

1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With

Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.

2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly.

They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural

nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like

Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the

planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they

receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house

and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu

will act more like Mercury.

3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign

placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the

sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to

find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and

total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time

results effectively.

Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not

complete and may lead to confusion.

Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.

A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.

1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by

Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th.

2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh

might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to

make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify

this antra.

Thanking you,

Cheers !!!

Ash

vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar <boxdel>

wrote:

> Dear Lakshmi,

> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He

not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a

trine

> lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides

being

> placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and

11th

> in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as

more

> powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with

> greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra

> associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house

would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets,

before

> coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga

then

> SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19

> points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with

> Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of

nodes ,

> neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation

> weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> lakshmi ramesh wrote:

>

> > Om Gurave Namah

> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,

> >

> > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona.

Please

> > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more

empowered

to

> > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality,

Jupiter

> > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Lakshmi

> >

> >

> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lakshmi,

> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house

and

in

> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana

rakshati

> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he

is in

own

> > house.

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:

> >

> >> Om Gurave Namah

> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,

> >>

> >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru

in 4th

and

> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual

with

great

> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and

a rare

> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one

of the

finest

> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very

attached

to

> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what

so ever

on

> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in

his

work

> >> environment and has all the comforts one could

desire.

Infact,

> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna,

which is

> >> good for the general health & happiness of the

person.

> >>

> >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th

(Dhanus) is my

own

> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for

nearly 20

> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after

marriage.

> >>

> >> I am posting the charts here.

> >>

> >> I request that you also post the charts of the

individuals to

> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our

edification and

> >> discussion.

> >>

> >> Regards,

> >> Lakshmi

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/*

wrote:

> >>

> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >>

> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught

by you

> >> related to

> >> guru in various bhavas.

> >>

> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for

siblings.Even

when

> >> in own

> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home

front.

> >>

> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and

not in

own

> >> sign some

> >> physical weakness and health problems in

childhood.

> >>

> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.

> >>

> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not

favourable while

> >> transiting

> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th

kendra

is

> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only

2nd,5th,7th

> >> and 9th

> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in

general.

> >>

> >> Respect

> >> Pradeep

> >>

> >> vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> <boxdel>

> >> wrote:

> >> > Dear Anuj,

> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly

said in

your

> >> message

> >> to

> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to

astrologers.

> >> There are

> >> many

> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the

veracity

of the

> >> dictum, I

> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.

> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up

terms like

> >> Benefic/Malefic

> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give.

This

happens more

> >> with

> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it

with

Deeksha

> >> Guru as

> >> his

> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to

forget

Parashara

> >> telling

> >> when

> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute

only good

and

> >> pious

> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my

personal

feelings and

> >> prejudices

> >> > apart from application of astrological

principles.

> >> > Take care,

> >> > Chandrashekhar.

> >> >

> >> > nameisego wrote:

> >> >

> >> > >

> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.

> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the

senior most

Guru

> >> in age

> >> and

> >> > > experience in this group.

> >> > > Your observation about Guru is

absolutely right.

> >> > > Self had posted in this group and

elsewhere an

article on "

> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back

where it was

shown

> >> Guru's

> >> > > position in various houses which had

been

> >> destroyed/troubled by

> >> Guru.

> >> > >

> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva

> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"

> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.

> >> > >

> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older

postings and read

for

> >> yourself and

> >> > > check the examples that were given.

> >> > >

> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn

is, Jupiter

sucks the

> >> goodness

> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it

aspects.

Saturn

> >> sucks the

> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the

house it

occupies.

> >> > >

> >> > > Tatvam-Asi

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > vedic astrology,

PNRazdan

> >> <pnrazdan>

> >> > > wrote:

> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > You seem to be extending your

arguments against

Jupiter

> >> still

> >> > > further.

> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub

in houses it is

a

> >> designated as a

> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based

on the principle

of

> >> "Karka

> >> Bhavo

> >> > > Nasa"

> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm

every house it is

> >> placed in.

> >> Why

> >> > > this

> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of

millions believing

in Vedic

> >> > > Astrology

> >> > > > (in lighter vein).

> >> > > >

> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a

sage, source was not

> >> given by

> >> you. But

> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient

astrology. It

always

> >> speaks

> >> of

> >> > > the

> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter.

Somewhere it is even

> >> said, that

> >> > > howsoever

> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will

still try to help

the

> >> subject. And

> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our

experience.

> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do

some more

hardwork for

> >> convincing

> >> > > all

> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the

heavenly

Brahiman. This

> >> would

> >> > > even

> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic

Astrology.

> >> > > > Pran Razdan

> >> > > >

> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel>

wrote:

> >> > > >

> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,

> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in

connection with what

> >> Shubhangi had

> >> asked.

> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he

is placed in is a

dictum

> >> given

> >> by

> >> > > sages

> >> > > > > and

> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to

find out the

reason. If one

> >> wants to

> >> > > > > find

> >> > > > > the reason about Leo,

consider this in natural

zodiac

> >> Leo is

> >> in

> >> > > 5th

> >> > > > > house whose occupation by

Jupiter leads to

Karaka Bhava

> >> Dasha. In

> >> > > > > 11th

> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it

is not only Jupiter

who is

> >> Shubha

> >> > > there.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst

many strengths

> >> considered but

> >> not

> >> > > as

> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter

gets that in Lagna.

> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > In my humble view,

(Jupiter may not be

preferred in

> >> Leo for

> >> > > > > Muhurta,

> >> > > > > > I do not know much about

muhurta related

> >> configurations),It may

> >> > > not

> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of

Bala necessarily

(generally

> >> speaking).

> >> > > In

> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd

house in Libra is

considered bad.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house

(any sign) will have

directional

> >> strength

> >> > > to

> >> > > > > > initiate for results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > There must be more than

this reason, for

jupiter to

> >> give

> >> > > negative

> >> > > > > > results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> > > > > <boxdel>

> >> > > > > > wrote:

> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,

> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you

must know that Jupiter

looses his

> >> > > strength in

> >> > > > > > Leo

> >> > > > > > > and that is why

there are no Muhurtas for

> >> marriages when

> >> > > Jupiter

> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or

what is called as Simhastha.

That

> >> is due

> >> to

> >> > > the

> >> > > > > > fact of

> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala.

In your brother's case Sun

> >> being in

> >> own

> >> > > Rasi

> >> > > > > > makes

> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and

therefore good relations with

> >> Father. But

> >> I

> >> > > would

> >> > > > > > say he

> >> > > > > > > would not follow

father's profession.

> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik

wrote:

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for

intervening in your session, but

I am

> >> curious

> >> to

> >> > > know

> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter

losing its strength

in leo

> >> and

> >> hence

> >> > > this

> >> > > > > > email.

> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your

dictum worked in my brother's

case also.

> >> > > > > > > >My brother has

sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no

> >> doubt he

> >> is very

> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not

do much well in

academics

> >> and yes,

> >> he

> >> > > did

> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th

class.

> >> > > > > > > >With my half

knowledge I thought the reason

to

> >> be the

> >> > > > > positioning

> >> > > > > > of both the planets in

8th, but now curious to

know

> >> why jup

> >> > > losses

> >> > > > > > strength in leo.

> >> > > > > > > >But though both

planets are positioned in

8th, both

> >> father

> >> > > and

> >> > > > > > son shares good relation

with each other.

> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,

> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep

2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,

> >> > > > > > > >>There you

see the dictum working. Is it

not?

> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,

> >> > > > > > >

>>Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >&

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My answers in CAPS below.

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Dear Ash,I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case

you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a combination

of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system.

ASH : THE SYSTEM I USE IS KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARG AND ITS PART OF VEDIC ASTROLOGY.

I DONT KNOW WHAT U MEAN BY GRAHA BHAVA BALA SYSTEM. IN SHORT WE CAN COMPUTE

THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND ALSO FOR ALL 16 D

CHARTS. SO ITS VEDIC ASTROLOGY ONLY AND NOT DIFFERENT. AS PER KAS WE DO NOT

TALK IN GENERAL TERMS AS SHANI IS STRONG OR WEAK BUT WE CAN GO INTO DETAILS AS

PER POINTS AND FIND OUT HOW A PLANET WILL ACT FOR EACH HOUSE. IN MOST CASES

PLANETS DO NOT ACT BAD FOR ALL HOUSES. IN SHANI ANTRA AS PER RAMESH'S CHART IT

WILL BE GOOD FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AS COMPARED TO GURU'S ANTRA FOR 4TH HOUSE

MATTERS AT THE SAME TIME FOR 10TH HOUSE MATTESR GURU WILL BE MUCH STRONGER THAN

SHANI AS YOU CAN SEE AS PER POINTS. ABOUT NAVAMSA I SHALL COMMENT BELOW.

 

There is no harm in using it as long as results come true. However it is not a

different Ashtakavarga system per se.

ASH : ASHTAKVARG IS ASHTAKVARG AND HOW TO USE IT IS NOT GIVEN CLEARLY IN ANY

TEXTS. PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION BASED ON CURRENT TEXTS THAT ITS USED TO

TIME DEATH OR ITS USE IS LIMITED TO TRANSITS WHICH IS NOT CORRECT. THAT HAS

ALWAYS BEEN WHAT I TRY TO SAY AND EXPLAIN WHEN PEOPLE COMMENT ON ASHTAKVARGA

AND ITS USED ONLY IN TRANSITS. THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN WHICH ITS USED TO TIME

EVENTS IS NOT WRITTEN IN ANY BOOK OR CLASSICS DESPITE MANY MAHARISHIS LIKE

PARASARA, VARHARAMIRA ETC HAVE ALL MENTIONED ASHTAKVARGA IN THEIR TEXTS.

I was talking about a different Ashtakavarga system that you had suggested exists.

ASH : I HAVE NOT SUGGESTED ANYTHING OF THAT KIND. KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARGA SYSTEM

IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH WE USE ASHTAKVARGA TO FIND THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR

EACH HOUSE. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS ANY SYSTEM OUT THERE THAT DOES THAT.

RESULTS CAN BE SEEN AT A GLANCE. FOR EXAMPLE RAMESHS MARRIAGE MIGHT HAVE

HAPPENED DURING MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY HAS THE HIGHEST STRENGTH IN THE CHART

FOR 7TH HOUSE. AND IS LOD OR 10TH LORD FROM 7TH HOUSE. MAHADAHSA CAN BE THAT

OF SHANI. SHANI IS SAMDHARMI TO NAKTURAL KARAK VENUS OF MARRIAGE. SO SHANI

MD/ MERCURY AD CAN GIVE MARRIAGE. THERE ARE 2 ZEROES IN BAV ONE DUE TO VENUS

AND OTHER DUE TO MARS AND MERCURY SO RESULT WILL BE IN LAST SECTOR OF MERCURY

ANTRA. MERCURY ANTRA RUNS IN SHANI MD RUNS FROM 1983/11 THRU 1986/JULY. 3RD

SECTOR STARTS 1985/07 THRU 1986/07. I AM NOT GOING FURTHER. IF THIS IS IN THE

BALL PARK ITS GOOD AND ONE CAN NARROW IT DOWN FURTHER WITH SUNS TRANSIT

OVER STRONG SIGNIFICATORS FOR 7TH HOUSE AS PER THE WORKSHEET POINTS. MAYBE

LAKSHMI CAN VERIFY WHEN HER MARRIAGE TOOK PLACE WITH RAMESH.

Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no doubt yet it is

only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one more bindu of influence

for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might not mean that other planet is

getting a bindu less.

ASH : THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT SCHEME THAT IS IN TEXTS TODAY

AVAILABLE GIVEN AS PER PARASARA AND WHATS GIVEN OR PRESERVED FROM VARHARAMIRA.

BOTH ARE GREAT SAGES AND THEIR BAV SCHEMES MUST BE SAME. PARASARAS HAS BEEN

CORRPUT OVER TIME. THE DIFFERENCES IN IN BAV FOR MOONS PLACMENT FROM MOON AND

GURU AND VENUS FROM MARS. THIS HAS VERY DEEP MEANING AND SAYING FOR EXAMPLE IF

VENUS GETS POWER IF IN 4TH FROM MARS AND IF VENUS IS NOT GETTING POWER OR A

BINDU IF IN 4TH FROM MARS HAS A BIG DIFFERENCE. THERE ARE ONLY 337 POINTS AND

IT WOULD MEAN THAT IF AS IN THE CASE OF RAMESHES CHART IF HIS 7TH BHAVA GETS

19TH IT MEANS THAT THAT 1 BINDU OF FROM THE POOL OF 337 HAS GONE TO SOME OTHER

HOUSE. IF A PLANET IS IN THAT HOUSE IT MAY GET 1 BINDU MORE STRENGTH AND IT

MAY CHANGE THE ENTIRE CHART. IF THAT PLANET IS IN 4TH FROM A MALEFIC PLANET

(BY MALEFIC I MEAN A PLANET WITH < 4 BINDUS EXCEPT MOON) AND IF THAT PLANET

WERE TO GET STRNGTH THEN

THAT PLANET WOULD BECOME VERY STRONG FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. THAT WOULD CHANGE THE

ENTIRE COMPLEXION OF THE CHART. WITH ASKTAVARG WE ARE VERY PARTICULAR AND THIS

IS NOT A TRIVIAL MATTER. 1 BINDUS CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE.

I said 19 Bindus as the chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that format.

Varahamihira has exactly 8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is not a different

system. He only has a different opinion about which places are influenced by

Lagna in case of some of the planets. Parashara has, on the other hand,

exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga.

ASH : THIS IS NOT TRUE. BAV SCHEMES HAVE TO MATCH. I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU

ARE SAYING BY SYSTEMS. THE CORE AND BASIC OF ASHTAKVARG SYSTEM IS THE BAV

POINTS. IF PARASARA IS SAYING THAT MOON IS NOT GIVING STRENGTH TO 9TH BHAVA

WHEAREAS VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING IT DOES. THIS IS HUGE DIFFERECE OUT HERE.

SIMILARLY MOON IS BENEFIC IN 2ND FROM GURU AND VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING THAT 1

BINDUS STRENGTH IS NOT GIVEN. THIS IS THE BASIC. YOU JUST CANNOT SAY THAT THE

DIFFERENCE OF OPINION IS "ONLY". THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING. IMAGINE A SYSTEM

THAT IS USED ACCURATELY FOR TIMING OF EVENTS THE SAV VALUES FROM WHICH THE

STRENGTH OF ALL PLANEST AND FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE IS COMPUTED AND ITS BASED

ON SAV AND SAV IS BASED ON BAV. IN THE LEAST WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MIGHT

SURMOUNT TO COMPOUNDING OF ERROR. ACTUALLY IF YOU STUDY HOW ONE COMES TO THE

POINTS THAT I HAVE DISPLAYED IN MY PREVIOUS MAILS YOU WILL BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND

WHY I AM SO

PICKY WITH THIS DISTRIBUTION OF BAV AND STICKING TO VARHARAMIRA. IF WE DIFFER

ON THIS VIEW WE CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE.

I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than Guru in reply to Lakshmi.

ASH : YES, I DID READ YOUR INTERSTING COMMENT BUT I WAS NOT CLEAR ON WHAT YOU

MEANT BY STRONGER. STRONGER FOR WHAT EVENTS ? DID U MEAN STRONGER FOR

DELIVERING RESULTS OR ALL 12 HOUSES. CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC. WHEN I GAVE

THE POINTS I AM BEING VERY SPECIFIC AND COMPARING GURU WITH SHANI FOR ALL 12

HOUSES. I AM BEING SPECIFIC IN SAYING THAT IN GURU ANTRA RAMESH WILL HAVE MORE

AUTHORITY AS COMPARED TO SHANI. GURU IS IN UPCAHYA FROM 10TH HOUSE AND WITH 5

BINDUS. SO ITS VERY EAGER TO GIVE 2ND AND 10TH HOUSE MATTERS. SHANI IS EAGER

TO GIVE RESULTS FOR 12TH, 4TH, 11TH, AND 3RD HOUSE IN ITS ANTRA. CAN YOU BE

MORE SPECIFIC. I DO NOT THINK SHANI IS BAD FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE AND

NEITHER IS GURU IN HIS ANTRA. AGAIN I AM RESTRICTING THE RESULTS TO THE ANTRA.

I THINK IF U ARE MORE SPECIFIC THEN WE MIGHT BE SAYING THE SAME THING BUT FROM

A DIFFERENT VIEW POINT.

The reason it is not reflected in the table given by you is,as you have

indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not considered in the system you are

using.

ASH : THIS IS INCORRECT. THE STRENGTH IS DERIVED FROM RASHI AND THE WORKSHEET

POINTS ARE FROM RASHI ONLY. NAVAMSA HAS EQUAL STATUS AS COMPARED TO RASHI. WE

USE NAVAMSA FOR FINDING OUT THE SAMDHARMIS AND ALSO DELAY. ALL COMBINATIONS

HAVE TO BE CHECKED FROM BOTH RASI AND NAVAMSA. BUT FOR FINDING OUT THE STRENGH

OF PLANET ITS DONE FROM RASI. A WORKSHEET FOR EACH DIVISIONAL CHART IS ALSO

CASTED.

Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the Navamsha placement of planets could also change.

If you apply the strength from Navamsha as given in the chart provided by

Lakshmi, you will see my view point.

ASH : IT WILL NOT CHANGE THINGS. I CHECKED AFTER READING THIS COMMENT. IN BOTH

CASES USING KRUSHNAS AYANAMSA AND LAHIRI SHANI REMAINS IN LIBRA IN NAVAMSA SO

ITS SAMDHARMI TO VENUS. IT WILL REPLACE VENUS FOR THE HOUSE THAT VENUS IS

UNABLE TO DELIVER RESULTS. THE POSITION OF MARS CHANGES IN LAGNA THOUGH.

MAYBE IF U SEE THINGS WITH MARS BEING IN 12TH INSTEAD OF 11TH YOU MAY SEE MY

VIEW POINT. AGAIN I AM EMPHASISING ON THE FACT THAT STRENGTH OR THE WORKSHEET

THAT I GAVE IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI ONLY AND SAMDHARMIS IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI

AND NAVAMSA. RASHI AND NAVAMSA HAVE EQUAL STATUS AS PER KAS AND WE FOLLOW

CERTAIN RULES FOR FINDING DELAY. I HAVE DEMONSTRATED IN THIS MAIL REGARDING

MARRIAGE OF RAMESH WITH LAKSHMI. FOR THAT I HAVE COMPUTED DELAY FOR MARRIAGE

USING 2 ZEROES, AND SHANI ASPECTING PRIMIARY SIGNIFICATOR HOUSES FROM RASHI AND

THEIR LORDS IN NAVAMSA AND USING WORKSHEET STRENGTH I HAVE COMPUTED THE TIME

FRAME. IT WILL

BE INTERSTING IF LAKSHMI CAN COMMENT ON THE SAME. THERE IS A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE

IN THE WORKSHEET. SOME HOW IN HASTE MY AYANAMSA CHANGE BUT IT WILL NOT MAKE A

DIFFERENCE FOR MARRAIGE. HERE IS THE CORRECTED VERSION OF THE WORKSHEET.

MERCURY STILL HAS 18 POINTS FOR 7TH HOUSE AND MOSTLY ALL HOUSES.

Hse

SAV Pt

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

25

17

20

12

20

11

7

10

2

23

9

16

14

22

22

14

12

3

31

16

15

12

11

4

14

7

4

26

11

17

7

23

7

10

23

5

32

12

23

9

19

16

22

15

6

32

18

16

18

21

5

8

11

7

20

10

14

9

18

11

18

10

8

19

22

12

9

25

4

17

10

9

28

8

12

14

7

5

21

3

10

34

17

13

7

16

21

16

4

11

38

16

15

15

21

4

15

19

12

29

10

14

11

9

8

14

15

 

THANKING YOU,

CHEERS !!!

ASH

Regards,Chandrashekhar.Ash wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi,

There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and a house getting 19

bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with 20 bindus being a stronger

than 19 bindus. At the same token if a bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one

other house is getting 1 bindu less. It also means that some planet has made a

favourable yog w.r.t one house and not with another. Is it not ?

I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware.

In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of each planet for each

and every house and also for each and every 16 divisional chart. When casting

the worksheet the aspects are not considered in the D charts only the basis

strength.

The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become corrupt. The BAV

distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The settings are also given in

JHL software where you tick off the check boxes in the lite version. If you

use the option of Varharamira you will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would

be good to understand if you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV

or generally use Varharmiras scheme ?

To come to the final stength of each and every planet for each house .

 

Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart.

 

These are total strength of the planets and derived by considering the following.

 

1) 4:10

2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th lord from house under consideration

3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under consideration with > 4 bindus.

4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak, phal and phalit sthans.

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets

6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus

7) Adjustment of 6th lord.

 

After meticulously considering all these factors we come to strength of each

planet for each and every house. Like that we also compute strength for all d

charts but in that we only conider the strength for karak, phal and phalit

sthan for each and every house.

 

You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you can see both Shani and

Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their results in their respective antar

dasha.

 

I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from parasara. Actually

parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become corrupt over time.

 

Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying 10th house and also

Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon so its very eager to give

results for 10th house.

 

If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points for 10th house and

Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big difference in authority that

Ramesh would have been bestowed in the antras of Guru and Shani.

At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and shani and compare

the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in shani compared to Guru

antra.

 

 

House

Signs

SAV

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

Gemini

23

16

19

13

20

17

7

16

2

Cancer

24

10

15

20

23

23

14

16

3

Leo

30

9

21

9

19

11

11

13

4

Virgo

26

7

22

9

24

14

4

23

5

Libra

33

8

23

5

20

22

16

19

6

Scorpio

32

16

20

21

24

13

9

17

7

Sagittarius

20

7

19

5

25

17

12

8

8

Capricorn

21

15

19

9

24

9

12

12

9

Aquarius

29

7

17

13

11

14

22

9

10

Pisces

29

13

10

-2

17

22

9

7

11

Aries

40

11

21

10

26

14

10

19

12

Taurus

30

5

21

10

19

12

10

20

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Dear Ash,Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there

however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any Ashtakavarga

system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas based on Lagna of a

native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects received by it and

association with other planets. May I know to which system you are referring to

and the weightage for these factors given in that system by increasing or

reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.If you are talking about using other parameters in

association with Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and

would not constitute different system than

Parashara.Regards,Chandrashekhar.ashsam73 wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and LakshmiPardon me for my intervention.I would like to

comment on Ashtakavarga.1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV.

With Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.2) For nodes

are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly. They are samdharmi to

sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural nature as you have said or quoted in

numerious posts Rahu is like Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will

be more like the planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points

they receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house and in 3rd

house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu will act more like

Mercury. 3) With regards to your comment on

Ashtakavarg not using sign placement is not entirely correct. If used with a

proper system the sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not

used to find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and total

strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time results

effectively.Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is

not complete and may lead to confusion. Ashtakvarg system used is an effective

tool in timing of events.A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.1) In Ramesh's

chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by Venus to 7th and one by Mars

to 8th. 2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh might have

been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to make investments and

accumulation of wealth.

Lakshami can verify this antra.Thanking you,Cheers !!!Ash--- In

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> Dear

Lakshmi,> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a trine > lord.

He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides being > placed in a

trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and 11th > in Navamsha and in

3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as more > powerful than Jupiter, even

if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with > greater strength. But there too he is

only a Kendra Lord in Kendra > associating a trine lord. Since we are talking

about 7th house would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets, before > coming

to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga then > SAV would

rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19 > points. Personally I

give more weightage to Natal chart read with > Navamsha. the reason is

Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of nodes , > neither do they consider

house ownership or Rasi occupation > weightage.Your opinion would be

appreciated.> Chandrashekhar.> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> > > Om Gurave Namah> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,> > > > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own

house/moolatrikona. Please > > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who

is more empowered to > > protect the house, based on both strength and

functionality, Jupiter > > or Saturn? I

request you to ponder on this.> > > > Regards,> > Lakshmi> > > >> >

*/Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:> >> > Dear Lakshmi,> > If I may

point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house and in> > Ramesh's case

Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana rakshati> > Mandah. Guru's

exception to house damage occurs when he is in own> > house.> >

Chandrashekhar.> >> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:> >> >> Om Gurave Namah> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,>

>> > >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru in 4th

and> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual with great> >>

knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and a rare> >> inner

harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one of the finest> >> individuals

I have ever come across, and he is very attached to> >> his family and

mother and there are no problems what so ever on> >> the home front. This

individual is highly esteemed in his work> >> environment and has all the

comforts one could desire. Infact,> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast

sukhargala on

lagna, which is> >> good for the general health & happiness of the person.>

>> > >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th (Dhanus) is my

own> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for nearly 20> >>

years. My husband has prospered remarkably after marriage.> >> > >> I

am posting the charts here.> >> > >> I request that you also post the

charts of the individuals to> >> whom you were referring in your post, for

our edification and> >> discussion.> >> >

>> Regards,> >> Lakshmi > >> > >>> >>> >> */vijayadas_pradeep

<vijayadas_pradeep>/* wrote:> >>> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >>>

>> I have been trying to test the principles taught by you> >>

related to> >> guru in various bhavas.> >>> >> When in 3rd

always some difficulties for siblings.Even when> >> in own>

>> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home front.> >>> >>

When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and not in own> >> sign

some> >> physical weakness and health problems in childhood.> >>> >>

Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.> >>> >> Also sages have

advised that Guru is not favourable while> >> transiting> >>

kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th kendra is> >>

beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only 2nd,5th,7th> >> and 9th>

>> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in general.> >>> >>

Respect> >> Pradeep> >>> >> --- In

vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar> >> <boxdel>> >>

wrote:> >> > Dear Anuj,>

>> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly said in your> >>

message> >> to> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known

to astrologers.> >> There are> >> many> >> > shlokas to

that effects and charts prove the veracity of the> >> dictum, I> >>

> have myself posted a few of them earlier.> >> > Unfortunately there

is a tendency to mix up terms like>

>> Benefic/Malefic> >> > with the results a planet is likely to

give. This happens more> >> with> >> > Jupiter as people

usually tend to equate it with Deeksha> >> Guru as> >> his> >>

> name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to forget Parashara> >>

telling> >> when> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to

attribute only good and>

>> pious> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my personal

feelings and> >> prejudices> >> > apart from application of

astrological principles.> >> > Take care,> >> >

Chandrashekhar.> >> >> >> > nameisego wrote:> >> >> >>

> >> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.>

>> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the senior most Guru> >>

in age> >> and> >> > > experience in this group.> >>

> > Your observation about Guru is absolutely right.> >> > > Self had

posted in this group and elsewhere an article on "> >> > > "Guru Boon

or Bane??" some time back where it was shown> >> Guru's> >> > >

position in various houses which had been>

>> destroyed/troubled by> >> Guru.> >> > >> >> >

> "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"> >>

> > This Dictum had been proved by self.> >> > >> >> > > You

may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older postings and read for> >> yourself and>

>> > > check the examples that were given.>

>> > >> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn is, Jupiter

sucks the> >> goodness> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to

houses it aspects. Saturn> >> sucks the> >> > > houses he

aspects and increases the house it occupies.> >> > >> >> > >

Tatvam-Asi> >> > >> >> > >>

>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >

vedic astrology, PNRazdan> >> <pnrazdan>>

>> > > wrote:> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,> >> > > >

You seem to be extending your arguments against Jupiter>

>> still> >> > > further.> >> > > > Firstly you said

that Jup is ashub in houses it is a> >> designated as a> >> > >

> Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based on the principle of> >> "Karka> >>

Bhavo> >> > > Nasa"> >> > > > . Now you say that it will

harm every house it is> >> placed in.> >>

Why> >> > > this> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of

millions believing in Vedic> >> > > Astrology> >> > > > (in

lighter vein).> >> > > >> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of

a sage, source was not> >> given by> >> you. But> >> >

> > take out any basic book on ancient astrology. It always> >> speaks>

>> of> >> > > the> >> > > > benefic qualities of

Jupiter. Somewhere it is even> >> said, that> >> > > howsoever>

>> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will still try to help the> >>

subject. And> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our experience.>

>> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do some more hardwork for> >>

convincing>

>> > > all> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the heavenly

Brahiman. This> >> would> >> > > even> >> > > > mean a

paradigm shift in Vedic Astrology.> >> > > > Pran Razdan> >> >

> >> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel> wrote:> >> > >

>> >> >

> > > Dear Prafulla,> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in connection with

what> >> Shubhangi had> >> asked.> >> > > > > Jupiter

harming the house he is placed in is a dictum> >> given> >> by>

>> > > sages> >> > > > > and> >> > > > > there is no

reason to try to find out the reason. If one> >> wants to>

>> > > > > find> >> > > > > the reason about Leo, consider this

in natural zodiac> >> Leo is> >> in> >> > > 5th> >>

> > > > house whose occupation by Jupiter leads to Karaka Bhava> >>

Dasha. In> >> > > > > 11th> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha

so it is not only Jupiter who is> >> Shubha>

>> > > there.> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Disha strength is

one amongst many strengths> >> considered but> >> not> >>

> > as> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter gets that in Lagna.>

>> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > >> >> > > > >

Prafulla Gang wrote:>

>> > > > >> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji> >> > >

> > >> >> > > > > > In my humble view, (Jupiter may not be preferred

in> >> Leo for> >> > > > > Muhurta,> >> > > > > > I do

not know much about muhurta related> >> configurations),It may> >>

> > not> >> > > > > > become weak in

terms of Bala necessarily (generally> >> speaking).> >> > > In>

>> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd house in Libra is considered bad.> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house (any sign) will

have directional> >> strength> >> > > to> >> > > > > >

initiate for results.> >> > > > > >>

>> > > > > > There must be more than this reason, for jupiter to> >>

give> >> > > negative> >> > > > > > results.> >> > >

> > >> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang> >> > > > > >> >>

> > > > >> >> > > > > > vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar> >> > > > > <boxdel>> >> > > > > > wrote:>

>> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian

you must know that Jupiter looses his> >> > > strength in> >> >

> > > > Leo> >> > > > > > > and that is why there are no Muhurtas for>

>> marriages when>

>> > > Jupiter> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or what is called as

Simhastha. That> >> is due> >> to> >> > > the> >>

> > > > > fact of> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala. In your brother's

case Sun> >> being in> >> own> >> > > Rasi> >>

> > > > >

makes> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and therefore good relations with> >>

Father. But> >> I> >> > > would> >> > > > > > say

he> >> > > > > > > would not follow father's profession.> >> >

> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >

Shubhangi Naik wrote:> >> >

> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,> >> > > > > > > >> >>

> > > > > > >Sorry for intervening in your session, but I am> >>

curious> >> to> >> > > know> >> > > > > > the logic

behind jupiter losing its strength in leo> >> and> >> hence> >>

> > this>

>> > > > > > email.> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your dictum worked in

my brother's case also.> >> > > > > > > >My brother has sun+jup in leo

but in 8th, no> >> doubt he> >> is very> >> > > > > >

intelligent but did not do much well in academics> >> and yes,> >>

he> >> > > did> >> > > > > > fail

once in his 10th class.> >> > > > > > > >With my half knowledge I

thought the reason to> >> be the> >> > > > > positioning> >>

> > > > > of both the planets in 8th, but now curious to know> >>

why jup> >> > > losses> >> > > > > > strength in leo.> >>

> > > > > > >But though both planets are positioned in 8th, both> >>

father>

>> > > and> >> > > > > > son shares good relation with each

other.> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi> >>

> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >>

> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > >

> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :>

>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >

>>Dear Dhira,> >> > > > > > > >>There you see the dictum working. Is it

not?> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,> >> > > > > > >

>>Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > > > > >>> >&

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash,

Ashtakavarga system is based on Bindus allotted to particular houses

for each of the planet with respect to its position from the planet

whose Ashtakavarga is being drawn.

The system you are using is based on considering the strengths of

planets and the Bhavas too. This is the system generally referred as

Parashari or more precisely Hora system which also encompasses

the Ashtakavarga system.Ashtakavarga is primarily used to find

out effects from Transit of planets and longevity as made clear in

conversation between Maitreya and sage Parashara in

BPHS. Ashtakavarga system is clearly defined in that text.

No doubt the system can be adopted to various other predictions, as it

indicates influences on various bhavas. Its various uses have been well

documented in numerous texts besides BPHS and the very short

description of Varahamihira. The assumption that its use is not

mentioned for different uses in any other text but the two you

mentioned is not factually correct.

Krushna has developed different parameters and as long as the system

delivers results there should be no issue with that. It is easy to say

that Parashara and Varahamihira's texts are corrupted, and they could

be. But that does not prove that the bindus used are wrong especially

as most of other parameters that you mention are drawn from these very

texts. It is well known that Varaha Mihira was influenced by Greek

astrologers and has adopted some of their methods, so the bindus that

he attributes could also have come from them.

Since you give equal importance to Navamsha and Rasi whereas I go by

the old time system of planetary strength being derived from Navamsha,

it might not be possible for you to follow my meaning and reasons

behind attributing more strength to Saturn over Jupiter. The question

of strength of the two planets was raised by Lakshmi and I was

responding to that. I so far as influence over all 12 Rasis comment is

concerned, Vedic astrology does think that planets have influence over

all Bhavas and other planets and the way the results would manifest

depend on their mutual relation.

About not considering Navamsha strength, I am not able to

follow what you are saying. On the one hand you say that these

being equal you do not consider Navamsha in worksheet and that you only

use Navamsha to find samdharmi and on the other hand you say

that my contention is not correct.

Again you are talking about timing of events and the original

thread is about Guru's capacity to harm the house occupied by it. Anyway

let us await Lakshmi's comment about your observation on Mercury

Antar, though this is not part of the original discussions.

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

Ash wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar,

My answers in CAPS below.

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Dear Ash,

I forgot that you are using Krushna's Ashtakavarga system. In that case

you must be using Krushna's Ayanamsha. The system you are using is a

combination of Ashtakavarga and traditional Graha Bhava Bala system.

ASH : THE SYSTEM I USE IS KRUSHNAS ASHTAKVARG AND ITS PART OF

VEDIC ASTROLOGY. I DONT KNOW WHAT U MEAN BY GRAHA BHAVA BALA SYSTEM.

IN SHORT WE CAN COMPUTE THE STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH AND EVERY

HOUSE AND ALSO FOR ALL 16 D CHARTS. SO ITS VEDIC ASTROLOGY ONLY AND

NOT DIFFERENT. AS PER KAS WE DO NOT TALK IN GENERAL TERMS AS SHANI IS

STRONG OR WEAK BUT WE CAN GO INTO DETAILS AS PER POINTS AND FIND OUT

HOW A PLANET WILL ACT FOR EACH HOUSE. IN MOST CASES PLANETS DO NOT ACT

BAD FOR ALL HOUSES. IN SHANI ANTRA AS PER RAMESH'S CHART IT WILL BE

GOOD FOR 4TH HOUSE MATTERS AS COMPARED TO GURU'S ANTRA FOR 4TH HOUSE

MATTERS AT THE SAME TIME FOR 10TH HOUSE MATTESR GURU WILL BE MUCH

STRONGER THAN SHANI AS YOU CAN SEE AS PER POINTS. ABOUT NAVAMSA I

SHALL COMMENT BELOW.

 

There is no harm in using it as long as results come true.

However it is not a different Ashtakavarga system per se.

ASH : ASHTAKVARG IS ASHTAKVARG AND HOW TO USE IT IS NOT GIVEN

CLEARLY IN ANY TEXTS. PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION BASED ON CURRENT

TEXTS THAT ITS USED TO TIME DEATH OR ITS USE IS LIMITED TO TRANSITS

WHICH IS NOT CORRECT. THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN WHAT I TRY TO SAY AND

EXPLAIN WHEN PEOPLE COMMENT ON ASHTAKVARGA AND ITS USED ONLY IN

TRANSITS. THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN WHICH ITS USED TO TIME EVENTS IS NOT

WRITTEN IN ANY BOOK OR CLASSICS DESPITE MANY MAHARISHIS LIKE PARASARA,

VARHARAMIRA ETC HAVE ALL MENTIONED ASHTAKVARGA IN THEIR TEXTS.

I was talking about a different Ashtakavarga system that you had

suggested exists.

ASH : I HAVE NOT SUGGESTED ANYTHING OF THAT KIND. KRUSHNAS

ASHTAKVARGA SYSTEM IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH WE USE ASHTAKVARGA TO FIND THE

STRENGTH OF EACH PLANET FOR EACH HOUSE. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS ANY

SYSTEM OUT THERE THAT DOES THAT. RESULTS CAN BE SEEN AT A GLANCE. FOR

EXAMPLE RAMESHS MARRIAGE MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED DURING MERCURY ANTRA.

MERCURY HAS THE HIGHEST STRENGTH IN THE CHART FOR 7TH HOUSE. AND IS LOD

OR 10TH LORD FROM 7TH HOUSE. MAHADAHSA CAN BE THAT OF SHANI. SHANI IS

SAMDHARMI TO NAKTURAL KARAK VENUS OF MARRIAGE. SO SHANI MD/ MERCURY AD

CAN GIVE MARRIAGE. THERE ARE 2 ZEROES IN BAV ONE DUE TO VENUS AND

OTHER DUE TO MARS AND MERCURY SO RESULT WILL BE IN LAST SECTOR OF

MERCURY ANTRA. MERCURY ANTRA RUNS IN SHANI MD RUNS FROM 1983/11 THRU

1986/JULY. 3RD SECTOR STARTS 1985/07 THRU 1986/07. I AM NOT GOING

FURTHER. IF THIS IS IN THE BALL PARK ITS GOOD AND ONE CAN NARROW IT

DOWN FURTHER WITH SUNS TRANSIT OVER STRONG SIGNIFICATORS FOR 7TH HOUSE

AS PER THE WORKSHEET POINTS. MAYBE LAKSHMI CAN VERIFY WHEN HER

MARRIAGE TOOK PLACE WITH RAMESH.

Varahamihira does have a slightly different bindu placement no

doubt yet it is only different by way of allowing Lagna to have one

more bindu of influence for some planet's Ashtakavarga. So it might

not mean that other planet is getting a bindu less.

ASH : THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT SCHEME THAT IS IN

TEXTS TODAY AVAILABLE GIVEN AS PER PARASARA AND WHATS GIVEN OR

PRESERVED FROM VARHARAMIRA. BOTH ARE GREAT SAGES AND THEIR BAV SCHEMES

MUST BE SAME. PARASARAS HAS BEEN CORRPUT OVER TIME. THE DIFFERENCES

IN IN BAV FOR MOONS PLACMENT FROM MOON AND GURU AND VENUS FROM MARS.

THIS HAS VERY DEEP MEANING AND SAYING FOR EXAMPLE IF VENUS GETS POWER

IF IN 4TH FROM MARS AND IF VENUS IS NOT GETTING POWER OR A BINDU IF IN

4TH FROM MARS HAS A BIG DIFFERENCE. THERE ARE ONLY 337 POINTS AND IT

WOULD MEAN THAT IF AS IN THE CASE OF RAMESHES CHART IF HIS 7TH BHAVA

GETS 19TH IT MEANS THAT THAT 1 BINDU OF FROM THE POOL OF 337 HAS GONE

TO SOME OTHER HOUSE. IF A PLANET IS IN THAT HOUSE IT MAY GET 1 BINDU

MORE STRENGTH AND IT MAY CHANGE THE ENTIRE CHART. IF THAT PLANET IS IN

4TH FROM A MALEFIC PLANET (BY MALEFIC I MEAN A PLANET WITH < 4

BINDUS EXCEPT MOON) AND IF THAT PLANET WERE TO GET STRNGTH THEN THAT

PLANET WOULD BECOME VERY STRONG FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. THAT WOULD CHANGE

THE ENTIRE COMPLEXION OF THE CHART. WITH ASKTAVARG WE ARE VERY

PARTICULAR AND THIS IS NOT A TRIVIAL MATTER. 1 BINDUS CAN MAKE A HUGE

DIFFERENCE.

I said 19 Bindus as the chart sent by Dear Lakshmi was in that

format. Varahamihira has exactly 8 shlokas on Ashtakavarga and his is

not a different system. He only has a different opinion about which

places are influenced by Lagna in case of some of the planets.

Parashara has, on the other hand, exhaustively dealt with Ashtakavarga.

ASH : THIS IS NOT TRUE. BAV SCHEMES HAVE TO MATCH. I DONT

UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BY SYSTEMS. THE CORE AND BASIC OF

ASHTAKVARG SYSTEM IS THE BAV POINTS. IF PARASARA IS SAYING THAT MOON

IS NOT GIVING STRENGTH TO 9TH BHAVA WHEAREAS VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING IT

DOES. THIS IS HUGE DIFFERECE OUT HERE. SIMILARLY MOON IS BENEFIC IN

2ND FROM GURU AND VARHARAMIRA IS SAYING THAT 1 BINDUS STRENGTH IS NOT

GIVEN. THIS IS THE BASIC. YOU JUST CANNOT SAY THAT THE DIFFERENCE OF

OPINION IS "ONLY". THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING. IMAGINE A SYSTEM THAT IS

USED ACCURATELY FOR TIMING OF EVENTS THE SAV VALUES FROM WHICH THE

STRENGTH OF ALL PLANEST AND FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE IS COMPUTED AND

ITS BASED ON SAV AND SAV IS BASED ON BAV. IN THE LEAST WHAT YOU ARE

SAYING MIGHT SURMOUNT TO COMPOUNDING OF ERROR. ACTUALLY IF YOU STUDY

HOW ONE COMES TO THE POINTS THAT I HAVE DISPLAYED IN MY PREVIOUS MAILS

YOU WILL BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND WHY I AM SO PICKY WITH THIS DISTRIBUTION

OF BAV AND STICKING TO VARHARAMIRA. IF WE DIFFER ON THIS VIEW WE CAN

AGREE TO DISAGREE.

I have already given the reason I think Saturn is stronger than

Guru in reply to Lakshmi.

ASH : YES, I DID READ YOUR INTERSTING COMMENT BUT I WAS NOT

CLEAR ON WHAT YOU MEANT BY STRONGER. STRONGER FOR WHAT EVENTS ? DID U

MEAN STRONGER FOR DELIVERING RESULTS OR ALL 12 HOUSES. CAN YOU BE MORE

SPECIFIC. WHEN I GAVE THE POINTS I AM BEING VERY SPECIFIC AND

COMPARING GURU WITH SHANI FOR ALL 12 HOUSES. I AM BEING SPECIFIC IN

SAYING THAT IN GURU ANTRA RAMESH WILL HAVE MORE AUTHORITY AS COMPARED

TO SHANI. GURU IS IN UPCAHYA FROM 10TH HOUSE AND WITH 5 BINDUS. SO

ITS VERY EAGER TO GIVE 2ND AND 10TH HOUSE MATTERS. SHANI IS EAGER TO

GIVE RESULTS FOR 12TH, 4TH, 11TH, AND 3RD HOUSE IN ITS ANTRA. CAN YOU

BE MORE SPECIFIC. I DO NOT THINK SHANI IS BAD FOR EACH AND EVERY HOUSE

AND NEITHER IS GURU IN HIS ANTRA. AGAIN I AM RESTRICTING THE RESULTS

TO THE ANTRA. I THINK IF U ARE MORE SPECIFIC THEN WE MIGHT BE SAYING

THE SAME THING BUT FROM A DIFFERENT VIEW POINT.

The reason it is not reflected in the table given by you is,as

you have indicated Navamsha strength of planets is not considered in

the system you are using.

ASH : THIS IS INCORRECT. THE STRENGTH IS DERIVED FROM RASHI AND

THE WORKSHEET POINTS ARE FROM RASHI ONLY. NAVAMSA HAS EQUAL STATUS AS

COMPARED TO RASHI. WE USE NAVAMSA FOR FINDING OUT THE SAMDHARMIS AND

ALSO DELAY. ALL COMBINATIONS HAVE TO BE CHECKED FROM BOTH RASI AND

NAVAMSA. BUT FOR FINDING OUT THE STRENGH OF PLANET ITS DONE FROM

RASI. A WORKSHEET FOR EACH DIVISIONAL CHART IS ALSO CASTED.

Using Krushna's Ayanamsha the Navamsha placement of planets

could also change. If you apply the strength from Navamsha as given in

the chart provided by Lakshmi, you will see my view point.

ASH : IT WILL NOT CHANGE THINGS. I CHECKED AFTER READING THIS

COMMENT. IN BOTH CASES USING KRUSHNAS AYANAMSA AND LAHIRI SHANI

REMAINS IN LIBRA IN NAVAMSA SO ITS SAMDHARMI TO VENUS. IT WILL REPLACE

VENUS FOR THE HOUSE THAT VENUS IS UNABLE TO DELIVER RESULTS. THE

POSITION OF MARS CHANGES IN LAGNA THOUGH. MAYBE IF U SEE THINGS WITH

MARS BEING IN 12TH INSTEAD OF 11TH YOU MAY SEE MY VIEW POINT. AGAIN I

AM EMPHASISING ON THE FACT THAT STRENGTH OR THE WORKSHEET THAT I GAVE

IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI ONLY AND SAMDHARMIS IS COMPUTED FROM RASHI AND

NAVAMSA. RASHI AND NAVAMSA HAVE EQUAL STATUS AS PER KAS AND WE FOLLOW

CERTAIN RULES FOR FINDING DELAY. I HAVE DEMONSTRATED IN THIS MAIL

REGARDING MARRIAGE OF RAMESH WITH LAKSHMI. FOR THAT I HAVE COMPUTED

DELAY FOR MARRIAGE USING 2 ZEROES, AND SHANI ASPECTING PRIMIARY

SIGNIFICATOR HOUSES FROM RASHI AND THEIR LORDS IN NAVAMSA AND USING

WORKSHEET STRENGTH I HAVE COMPUTED THE TIME FRAME. IT WILL BE

INTERSTING IF LAKSHMI CAN COMMENT ON THE SAME. THERE IS A SLIGHT

DIFFERENCE IN THE WORKSHEET. SOME HOW IN HASTE MY AYANAMSA CHANGE BUT

IT WILL NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR MARRAIGE. HERE IS THE CORRECTED

VERSION OF THE WORKSHEET. MERCURY STILL HAS 18 POINTS FOR 7TH HOUSE

AND MOSTLY ALL HOUSES.

Hse

SAV Pt

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

25

17

20

12

20

11

7

10

2

23

9

16

14

22

22

14

12

3

31

16

15

12

11

4

14

7

4

26

11

17

7

23

7

10

23

5

32

12

23

9

19

16

22

15

6

32

18

16

18

21

5

8

11

7

20

10

14

9

18

11

18

10

8

19

22

12

9

25

4

17

10

9

28

8

12

14

7

5

21

3

10

34

17

13

7

16

21

16

4

11

38

16

15

15

21

4

15

19

12

29

10

14

11

9

8

14

15

 

THANKING YOU,

CHEERS !!!

ASH

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

Ash wrote:

Dear Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi,

There is a difference between a house getting 20 bindus and

a house getting 19 bindus as you are aware. I agree both are weak with

20 bindus being a stronger than 19 bindus. At the same token if a

bhave gets 1 bindu more it means one other house is getting 1 bindu

less.

It also means that some planet has made a favourable yog w.r.t one

house and not with another. Is it not ?

I use Krushnas Ashtakvarga system as you are also aware.

In that SAV is the base from that we derive the strength of

each planet for each and every house and also for each and every 16

divisional chart. When casting the worksheet the aspects are not

considered in the D charts only the basis strength.

The BAV values given by Parasara in my opinion have become

corrupt. The BAV distribution scheme by Varharamira is correct. The

settings are also given in JHL software where you tick off the check

boxes in the lite version. If you use the option of Varharamira you

will get 20 bindus for 7th house. It would be good to understand if

you have intentionally used Parasara's scheme of BAV or generally use

Varharmiras scheme ?

To come to the final stength of each and every planet for

each house .

 

Here is the final strength of planet for Ramesh's chart.

 

These are total strength of the planets and derived by

considering the following.

 

1) 4:10

2) Addition of 5 points for LoD and LoE or 10th lord and 6th

lord from house under consideration

3) Planets in 10th and 6th hosue from house under

consideration with > 4 bindus.

4) Planets aspecting primary significator house i.e Karak,

phal and phalit sthans.

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspects on karak, phal and phalit sthan

5) Benefic/Malefic Aspect on planets

6) Adjustment of 12th from house under focus

7) Adjustment of 6th lord.

 

After meticulously considering all these factors we come to

strength of each planet for each and every house. Like that we also

compute strength for all d charts but in that we only conider the

strength for karak, phal and phalit sthan for each and every house.

 

You have said that Shani is stronger than Guru. Here you

can see both Shani and Guru at a glace on how they will deliver their

results in their respective antar dasha.

 

I do hear ya regarding the system not being different from

parasara. Actually parasara did give the BAV scheme but it has become

corrupt over time.

 

Here Jupiter is in 10th from 10th house so its foritifying

10th house and also Guru is with 5 bindus in 7th house and in multrikon

so its very eager to give results for 10th house.

 

If you see the worksheet you can see Ju is having 22 points

for 10th house and Shani has 7 points for 10th house. There is a big

difference in authority that Ramesh would have been bestowed in the

antras of Guru and Shani.

At the same time if you see expenses v/s income in Guru and

shani and compare the 11th v/s 12th points you can see more expenses in

shani compared to Guru antra.

 

 

House

Signs

SAV

Su

Mo

Ma

Me

Ju

Ve

Sa

1

Gemini

23

16

19

13

20

17

7

16

2

Cancer

24

10

15

20

23

23

14

16

3

Leo

30

9

21

9

19

11

11

13

4

Virgo

26

7

22

9

24

14

4

23

5

Libra

33

8

23

5

20

22

16

19

6

Scorpio

32

16

20

21

24

13

9

17

7

Sagittarius

20

7

19

5

25

17

12

8

8

Capricorn

21

15

19

9

24

9

12

12

9

Aquarius

29

7

17

13

11

14

22

9

10

Pisces

29

13

10

-2

17

22

9

7

11

Aries

40

11

21

10

26

14

10

19

12

Taurus

30

5

21

10

19

12

10

20

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk>

wrote:

Dear

Ash,

Even with 20 points the Bhava lacks strength, is it not? Saturn there

however extends protection. By the way I am not aware of any

Ashtakavarga system which gives differential value of Bindus/Rekhas

based on Lagna of a native or placement of a planet in a Rasi, aspects

received by it and association with other planets. May I know to which

system you are referring to and the weightage for these factors given

in that system by increasing or reducing the Bindus/Rekhas.

If you are talking about using other parameters in association with

Ashtakavarga then of course that is a different matter and would not

constitute different system than Parashara.

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

ashsam73 wrote:

Dear

Chandrashekhar and Lakshmi

Pardon me for my intervention.

I would like to comment on Ashtakavarga.

1) It seems that you have used Parasaras scheme of BAV. With

Varharamiras scheme you get 20 points in Ramesh's 7th house.

2) For nodes are we know are not planets. They are used indirectly.

They are samdharmi to sign lord and nakshatra lord. For natural

nature as you have said or quoted in numerious posts Rahu is like

Shani and Ketu like Mars. Functionally they will be more like the

planet i.e. either sign lord or nak lord as per the points they

receive in their BAV. For example, if Rahu is in Gemini and nak of

punarvasu then it will represent Me and Ju. If say Ge is 3rd house

and in 3rd house Ju gets 5 bindus and Me gets say 6 bindus then Rahu

will act more like Mercury.

3) With regards to your comment on Ashtakavarg not using sign

placement is not entirely correct. If used with a proper system the

sign placement can give idea on quantum of result and its not used to

find timing of result. For timing of result Ashtakvarg, SAV and

total strength of planets derived from SAV is good enough to time

results effectively.

Maybe knowledge of Ashtakvarg that is available in texts today is not

complete and may lead to confusion.

Ashtakvarg system used is an effective tool in timing of events.

A couple of points on Ramesh's chart.

1) In Ramesh's chart there are 2 consecutive zeroes one given by

Venus to 7th and one by Mars to 8th.

2) Jupiter antra will be very eager to bestow authority to Ramesh and

also for acquisition of wealth. Between 1997/04 thru 1999/10 Ramesh

might have been given a role of responsibility. Also a good time to

make investments and accumulation of wealth. Lakshami can verify

this antra.

Thanking you,

Cheers !!!

Ash

vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar <boxdel>

wrote:

> Dear Lakshmi,

> I think in Ramesh's case Saturn is Lord of the 9th is it not? He

not

> only associates a Kendra Lord but is also is in kendra being a

trine

> lord. He is also Lord of Navamsha Lagna aspecting Lagna, besides

being

> placed in a trikona. Jupiter on the other hand is Lord of 2nd and

11th

> in Navamsha and in 3rd house. I would certainly treat Saturn as

more

> powerful than Jupiter, even if in Lagna Jupiter appears to be with

> greater strength. But there too he is only a Kendra Lord in Kendra

> associating a trine lord. Since we are talking about 7th house

would it

> not be right to look at the Navamsha strengths of the planets,

before

> coming to conclusion about 7th house? If we look at Ashtaka Varga

then

> SAV would rather prove my view point as it shows 7th house with 19

> points. Personally I give more weightage to Natal chart read with

> Navamsha. the reason is Ashtakavarga do not consider effects of

nodes ,

> neither do they consider house ownership or Rasi occupation

> weightage.Your opinion would be appreciated.

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> lakshmi ramesh wrote:

>

> > Om Gurave Namah

> >

> > Namaste Chandrasekar ji,

> >

> > Even in Ramesh's case, Jupiter is in own house/moolatrikona.

Please

> > look at the ashtakavarga & bala of Saturn. Who is more

empowered

to

> > protect the house, based on both strength and functionality,

Jupiter

> > or Saturn? I request you to ponder on this.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Lakshmi

> >

> >

> > */Chandrashekhar <boxdel>/* wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lakshmi,

> > If I may point out, in Javed's case Guru is in own house

and

in

> > Ramesh's case Saturn conjuncts Guru. The dictum is Sthana

rakshati

> > Mandah. Guru's exception to house damage occurs when he

is in

own

> > house.

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > lakshmi ramesh wrote:

> >

> >> Om Gurave Namah

> >>

> >> Namaste Pradeep ji,

> >>

> >> I happen to know of individuals who have strong Guru

in 4th

and

> >> 7th. Strong Guru in 4th has blessed the individual

with

great

> >> knowledge, an intelligence that borders on genius and

a rare

> >> inner harmony. That person, a devout Muslim, is one

of the

finest

> >> individuals I have ever come across, and he is very

attached

to

> >> his family and mother and there are no problems what

so ever

on

> >> the home front. This individual is highly esteemed in

his

work

> >> environment and has all the comforts one could

desire.

Infact,

> >> Guru in 4th is supposed to cast sukhargala on lagna,

which is

> >> good for the general health & happiness of the

person.

> >>

> >> The individual with Jupiter & Saturn in 7th

(Dhanus) is my

own

> >> dear husband. We have been very happily married for

nearly 20

> >> years. My husband has prospered remarkably after

marriage.

> >>

> >> I am posting the charts here.

> >>

> >> I request that you also post the charts of the

individuals to

> >> whom you were referring in your post, for our

edification and

> >> discussion.

> >>

> >> Regards,

> >> Lakshmi

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> */vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>/*

wrote:

> >>

> >> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >>

> >> I have been trying to test the principles taught

by you

> >> related to

> >> guru in various bhavas.

> >>

> >> When in 3rd always some difficulties for

siblings.Even

when

> >> in own

> >> sign and in 4th,problems for mother and at home

front.

> >>

> >> When in 7th at marriage front.When in Lagna and

not in

own

> >> sign some

> >> physical weakness and health problems in

childhood.

> >>

> >> Thus Guru tests the individual thouroughly.

> >>

> >> Also sages have advised that Guru is not

favourable while

> >> transiting

> >> kendra houses 1,4,and 10th from moon.Only the 7th

kendra

is

> >> beneficial.(Is there any reason for this?) Only

2nd,5th,7th

> >> and 9th

> >> are favourable.11th being good for all planets in

general.

> >>

> >> Respect

> >> Pradeep

> >>

> >> vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> <boxdel>

> >> wrote:

> >> > Dear Anuj,

> >> > I am glad you agree with me. As you rightly

said in

your

> >> message

> >> to

> >> > Razdan,a the dictum is pretty well known to

astrologers.

> >> There are

> >> many

> >> > shlokas to that effects and charts prove the

veracity

of the

> >> dictum, I

> >> > have myself posted a few of them earlier.

> >> > Unfortunately there is a tendency to mix up

terms like

> >> Benefic/Malefic

> >> > with the results a planet is likely to give.

This

happens more

> >> with

> >> > Jupiter as people usually tend to equate it

with

Deeksha

> >> Guru as

> >> his

> >> > name in Sanskrit is Guru. People tend to

forget

Parashara

> >> telling

> >> when

> >> > Guru can act as Maraka and want to attribute

only good

and

> >> pious

> >> > attributes to him. I prefer to keep my

personal

feelings and

> >> prejudices

> >> > apart from application of astrological

principles.

> >> > Take care,

> >> > Chandrashekhar.

> >> >

> >> > nameisego wrote:

> >> >

> >> > >

> >> > > Respected Chandrashekhar ji.

> >> > > Please accpet my pranams as you are the

senior most

Guru

> >> in age

> >> and

> >> > > experience in this group.

> >> > > Your observation about Guru is

absolutely right.

> >> > > Self had posted in this group and

elsewhere an

article on "

> >> > > "Guru Boon or Bane??" some time back

where it was

shown

> >> Guru's

> >> > > position in various houses which had

been

> >> destroyed/troubled by

> >> Guru.

> >> > >

> >> > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva

> >> > > Bhava Vriddhhi karau Shanih"

> >> > > This Dictum had been proved by self.

> >> > >

> >> > > You may (Mr.Razdan) go thro' older

postings and read

for

> >> yourself and

> >> > > check the examples that were given.

> >> > >

> >> > > Difference between Jupiter and saturn

is, Jupiter

sucks the

> >> goodness

> >> > > of a house and gives fruit to houses it

aspects.

Saturn

> >> sucks the

> >> > > houses he aspects and increases the

house it

occupies.

> >> > >

> >> > > Tatvam-Asi

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > >

> >> > > vedic astrology,

PNRazdan

> >> <pnrazdan>

> >> > > wrote:

> >> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar,

> >> > > > You seem to be extending your

arguments against

Jupiter

> >> still

> >> > > further.

> >> > > > Firstly you said that Jup is ashub

in houses it is

a

> >> designated as a

> >> > > > Karka like 2,5,9,10 and 11 based

on the principle

of

> >> "Karka

> >> Bhavo

> >> > > Nasa"

> >> > > > . Now you say that it will harm

every house it is

> >> placed in.

> >> Why

> >> > > this

> >> > > > animosity with Jup, the hope of

millions believing

in Vedic

> >> > > Astrology

> >> > > > (in lighter vein).

> >> > > >

> >> > > > You refer to some dictum of a

sage, source was not

> >> given by

> >> you. But

> >> > > > take out any basic book on ancient

astrology. It

always

> >> speaks

> >> of

> >> > > the

> >> > > > benefic qualities of Jupiter.

Somewhere it is even

> >> said, that

> >> > > howsoever

> >> > > > bad it may be placed in, it will

still try to help

the

> >> subject. And

> >> > > > this has been amply proved by our

experience.

> >> > > > I am afraid. you will have to do

some more

hardwork for

> >> convincing

> >> > > all

> >> > > > about your notions of Jupiter, the

heavenly

Brahiman. This

> >> would

> >> > > even

> >> > > > mean a paradigm shift in Vedic

Astrology.

> >> > > > Pran Razdan

> >> > > >

> >> > > > --- Chandrashekhar <boxdel>

wrote:

> >> > > >

> >> > > > > Dear Prafulla,

> >> > > > > Reference to Leo was in

connection with what

> >> Shubhangi had

> >> asked.

> >> > > > > Jupiter harming the house he

is placed in is a

dictum

> >> given

> >> by

> >> > > sages

> >> > > > > and

> >> > > > > there is no reason to try to

find out the

reason. If one

> >> wants to

> >> > > > > find

> >> > > > > the reason about Leo,

consider this in natural

zodiac

> >> Leo is

> >> in

> >> > > 5th

> >> > > > > house whose occupation by

Jupiter leads to

Karaka Bhava

> >> Dasha. In

> >> > > > > 11th

> >> > > > > all planets are Shubha so it

is not only Jupiter

who is

> >> Shubha

> >> > > there.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Disha strength is one amongst

many strengths

> >> considered but

> >> not

> >> > > as

> >> > > > > strong as Digbala and Jupiter

gets that in Lagna.

> >> > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote:

> >> > > > >

> >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > In my humble view,

(Jupiter may not be

preferred in

> >> Leo for

> >> > > > > Muhurta,

> >> > > > > > I do not know much about

muhurta related

> >> configurations),It may

> >> > > not

> >> > > > > > become weak in terms of

Bala necessarily

(generally

> >> speaking).

> >> > > In

> >> > > > > > fact, jupiter in 3rd

house in Libra is

considered bad.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > Jupiter in 11th house

(any sign) will have

directional

> >> strength

> >> > > to

> >> > > > > > initiate for results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > There must be more than

this reason, for

jupiter to

> >> give

> >> > > negative

> >> > > > > > results.

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > regards/Prafulla Gang

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > >

> >> > > > > > vedic astrology,

Chandrashekhar

> >> > > > > <boxdel>

> >> > > > > > wrote:

> >> > > > > > > Dear Shubhangi,

> >> > > > > > > Being an Indian you

must know that Jupiter

looses his

> >> > > strength in

> >> > > > > > Leo

> >> > > > > > > and that is why

there are no Muhurtas for

> >> marriages when

> >> > > Jupiter

> >> > > > > > > occupies Leo or

what is called as Simhastha.

That

> >> is due

> >> to

> >> > > the

> >> > > > > > fact of

> >> > > > > > > Guru lacking Bala.

In your brother's case Sun

> >> being in

> >> own

> >> > > Rasi

> >> > > > > > makes

> >> > > > > > > him Shubha and

therefore good relations with

> >> Father. But

> >> I

> >> > > would

> >> > > > > > say he

> >> > > > > > > would not follow

father's profession.

> >> > > > > > > Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > Shubhangi Naik

wrote:

> >> > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Dear Sir,

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >Sorry for

intervening in your session, but

I am

> >> curious

> >> to

> >> > > know

> >> > > > > > the logic behind jupiter

losing its strength

in leo

> >> and

> >> hence

> >> > > this

> >> > > > > > email.

> >> > > > > > > >Yes, your

dictum worked in my brother's

case also.

> >> > > > > > > >My brother has

sun+jup in leo but in 8th, no

> >> doubt he

> >> is very

> >> > > > > > intelligent but did not

do much well in

academics

> >> and yes,

> >> he

> >> > > did

> >> > > > > > fail once in his 10th

class.

> >> > > > > > > >With my half

knowledge I thought the reason

to

> >> be the

> >> > > > > positioning

> >> > > > > > of both the planets in

8th, but now curious to

know

> >> why jup

> >> > > losses

> >> > > > > > strength in leo.

> >> > > > > > > >But though both

planets are positioned in

8th, both

> >> father

> >> > > and

> >> > > > > > son shares good relation

with each other.

> >> > > > > > > >Thanks,

> >> > > > > > > >Shubhangi

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >On Wed, 15 Sep

2004 Chandrashekhar wrote :

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > >>Dear Dhira,

> >> > > > > > > >>There you

see the dictum working. Is it

not?

> >> > > > > > > >>Regards,

> >> > > > > > >

>>Chandrashekhar.

> >> > > > > > > >>

> >&

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...