Guest guest Posted March 27, 2004 Report Share Posted March 27, 2004 om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Narasimha Ji, Thanks for the coments on my analysis on Swamiji.Of course I have used the normal methods of birth time rectification and you may have your own methods also. Also as you wrote, I observed the Ak's Shashtyamsha deity which is Deva but I did not elaborated on that. With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana, Ramadas Rao."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: Namaste friends, I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they know. I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend. Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha. In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic aspect Ketu. In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with Ketu, after all. It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart! The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god). Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and not malefics. I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list. May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may write my reasoning later. Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Win an evening with the Indian cricket captain: India Promos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, Sri Satya Sai Baba did indicate that there is one more incarnation (final)of his that is yet to grace the earth. Hence the Saturn+Ketu combination in 12th house from karakamsa. Perhaps the last incarnation would have only Ketu in the 12th. How would you interpret the chart of Sri Raghavendra Swamy of Mantralayam, whose longevity was variously predicted as 70yrs, 300yrs and 700 yrs? Would Ketu be in the 12th from Karakamsa? Regards, Lakshmi vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c...> wrote: > Namaste friends, > > I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they know. > > I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend. > > Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha. > > In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic aspect Ketu. > > In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv), who posted her data here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with Ketu, after all. > > It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart! > > The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god). > > Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and not malefics. > > I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may write my reasoning later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Narsimha Ji, The following birth data has Ketu in 12th house. Please analyse for Moksha: DOB: November, 11, 1958POB: Mombasa, Kenya Longitude: 39 deg 40 Min East Lattitude: 4 deg 3 min South TOB: 5:15 PM or 17:15, 2hrs 45 mins east of GMT (this time difference was for the year 1958 for Kenya) Thanks,Devika."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: Namaste friends, I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they know. I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend. Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha. In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic aspect Ketu. In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with Ketu, after all. It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart! The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god). Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and not malefics. I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list. May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may write my reasoning later. Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Photos: om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Narsimha Ji, The following birth data has Ketu in 12th house. Please analyse for Moksha: DOB: November, 11, 1958POB: Mombasa, Kenya Longitude: 39 deg 40 Min East Lattitude: 4 deg 3 min South TOB: 5:15 PM or 17:15, 2hrs 45 mins east of GMT (this time difference was for the year 1958 for Kenya) Thanks,Devika."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: Namaste friends, I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they know. I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend. Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha. In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic aspect Ketu. In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with Ketu, after all. It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart! The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god). Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and not malefics. I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list. May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may write my reasoning later. Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Photos: om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 24, 2012 Report Share Posted October 24, 2012 Namaste Narasimha, I was watching a youtube video ( ) on Ista deva. The author mentioned that If Ketu is in union with the grahaha for Ista Deva or in 12th house it means Moksha according to Parashara Sloka (refer the video). In my case it is in Union. Can you please confirm if this is true. My Natal chart 9-12-1969 12:30pm Avadi, TN, INDIA 13 8 36 N, 80 4 59 E Please watch the video first, as he was specific about this. He got my Ista deva correct. But I though Ketu has to be in the 12th house. But he was confident that Parashara sloka mentions union also. Thank you so much in advance. KK Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, Sri Satya Sai Baba did indicate that there is one more incarnation (final)of his that is yet to grace the earth. Hence the Saturn+Ketu combination in 12th house from karakamsa. Perhaps the last incarnation would have only Ketu in the 12th. How would you interpret the chart of Sri Raghavendra Swamy of Mantralayam, whose longevity was variously predicted as 70yrs, 300yrs and 700 yrs? Would Ketu be in the 12th from Karakamsa? Regards, Lakshmi vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c...> wrote: > Namaste friends, > > I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they know. > > I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend. > > Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha. > > In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic aspect Ketu. > > In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv), who posted her data here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with Ketu, after all. > > It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart! > > The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god). > > Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and not malefics. > > I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may write my reasoning later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.