Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Dear members, Namaste. I'm sorry to disturb you agian with this issue which got into the lists out of my will as I have stated earlier. However the staements made need some clarification and some of it has already come, the rest is yet to come. Sanjay mentioned the following in his answer to me: Another thing - I have been observinghow you are directing your shisya to send money to me as Dakshina, and notto SJC/Sarbani. Be sure that I will not accept this from everyone. In onecase of Swee Chan I took the dakshina and not because you told her orsomething like that, but because the prasna and nimitta were right for me toaccept. Many people of SJC were there when this event happened on the 2nd night of the Hyderabad conference and they can testify that the donation offered by Swee Chan was taken by Sarabani in the name of SJC India, and not Sanjay personally. Sanjay took only the price of an air ticket from Hyderabad to Puri from her. The rest of the financial etc. questions are still unclear so I wond not form a definite standpoint on them AS I HAVE NOT DONE SO IN MY PREVIOUS EMAILS AS WELL. I'm looking at statements from both sides and trying to resolve the quandary of controversies. Yours, Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net Jyotish Remedies: WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET Phone:+36-309-140-839 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 This is really getting out of hand. The airing of private problems in a public forum shows extreme bad taste. It says more about the poster than anybody else. Please take your problems off-line. ... Max Gauranga Das [gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net] Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:00 AMvedic astrologyCc: Vedic Astrology (Symposium hosted by Shyamasundara Das)Subject: [vedic astrology] Clarification on Sanjay issue (please forward to other lists) Dear members, Namaste. I'm sorry to disturb you agian with this issue which got into the lists out of my will as I have stated earlier. However the staements made need some clarification and some of it has already come, the rest is yet to come. Sanjay mentioned the following in his answer to me: Another thing - I have been observinghow you are directing your shisya to send money to me as Dakshina, and notto SJC/Sarbani. Be sure that I will not accept this from everyone. In onecase of Swee Chan I took the dakshina and not because you told her orsomething like that, but because the prasna and nimitta were right for me toaccept. Many people of SJC were there when this event happened on the 2nd night of the Hyderabad conference and they can testify that the donation offered by Swee Chan was taken by Sarabani in the name of SJC India, and not Sanjay personally. Sanjay took only the price of an air ticket from Hyderabad to Puri from her. The rest of the financial etc. questions are still unclear so I wond not form a definite standpoint on them AS I HAVE NOT DONE SO IN MY PREVIOUS EMAILS AS WELL. I'm looking at statements from both sides and trying to resolve the quandary of controversies. Yours, Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net Jyotish Remedies: WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET Phone:+36-309-140-839Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 30/12/2002 ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 30/12/2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Dear Gauranga, Anne Rutherford, and Group, Normally I keep quiet on these SJC lists, but this last post by you, Gauranga, has really agitated my neurological reflexes. You are becoming transparent in a way that is uncomfortable. As others have so eloquently stated…enough is enough already. This is very private business about Sanjay’s personal life that you are personally and professionally uncomfortable with. You have therefore intentionally taken it upon yourself to resolve your discomfort publicly. If that were not the case, none of these forwarded emails would have ever reached a public domain in the first place. Not a one. So in actuality, it looks to me like it certainly was your “will” to take this matter up with an audience present. But I don’t believe that most of the rest of us care to hear any more about this. Yesterday, Anne Rutherford posted to many, many jyotish lists, Sanjay’s response to Gauranga’s allegations. For this mission, she d, posted, and then immediately un-d from lists. A few of these lists were moderator monitored for approval, so fortunately the post never reached the list. Many of these lists were not even involved in the original broadcast she circulated, and this kind of activity, at least in my book, is totally immature and unnecessary. For what purpose does this serve? Perhaps it is me, and I am just plain getting too old for this kind of juvenile nonsense that occurs on these lists…but enough already. Now today, you, Gauranga, elect to throw in a few more double-edged statements in a public forum that you wish “forwarded to other lists”, under the pretense of defending one action by Sanjay, while awaiting his response on others. Arbitrator… or judge and jury? With all due respect, let me ask you to just humbly reflect upon one thing…How can you retain any degree of evolved spiritual comfort when you can comfortably and personally tap into Sanjay’s head and continually enjoy the fruits of his shared wisdom, while at the same time you feel no shame in publicly kicking him below the belt…Are these the pure actions of a Holy Man? I believe there is a biblical verse that goes something like “Judge Not Lest Thee Be Judged.” Perhaps we can all learn something from this…myself included… Thanks for hearing me out. ~Namaste~ Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com/ mso-cellspacing:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"> bold;mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"> Clarification on Sanjay issue (please forward to other lists) mso-cellspacing:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"> Dear members, Namaste. I'm sorry to disturb you agian with this issue which got into the lists out of my will as I have stated earlier. However the staements made need some clarification and some of it has already come, the rest is yet to come. Sanjay mentioned the following in his answer to me: Another thing - I have been observing how you are directing your shisya to send money to me as Dakshina, and not to SJC/Sarbani. Be sure that I will not accept this from everyone. In one case of Swee Chan I took the dakshina and not because you told her or something like that, but because the prasna and nimitta were right for me to accept. Many people of SJC were there when this event happened on the 2nd night of the Hyderabad conference and they can testify that the donation offered by Swee Chan was taken by Sarabani in the name of SJC India, and not Sanjay personally. Sanjay took only the price of an air ticket from Hyderabad to Puri from her. The rest of the financial etc. questions are still unclear so I wond not form a definite standpoint on them AS I HAVE NOT DONE SO IN MY PREVIOUS EMAILS AS WELL. I'm looking at statements from both sides and trying to resolve the quandary of controversies. Yours, Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net Jyotish Remedies: WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET Phone:+36-309-140-839 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.