Guest guest Posted June 22, 2004 Report Share Posted June 22, 2004 Dear Your explanations of the role of mushrooms in TCM and Ayurveda helped quite a bit and made a lot of sense. Would you please explain the relationship of the elements inboth TCM and Ayurveda a little more? In Ayurveda, the elements are earth, water, fire, air and ether. In Chinese medicine, they are wood, fire, earth, metal, and water. I presume that water and fire would be exactly the same in both. Does wood correspond to something else? And the rest of them? Thanks GB Khalsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2004 Report Share Posted June 22, 2004 ayurveda, Guru Khalsa <greatyoga> wrote: > Dear > > Your explanations of the role of mushrooms in TCM and > Ayurveda helped quite a bit and made a lot of sense. > > Would you please explain the relationship of the > elements inboth TCM and Ayurveda a little more? In > Ayurveda, the elements are earth, water, fire, air and > ether. In Chinese medicine, they are wood, fire, > earth, metal, and water. I presume that water and > fire would be exactly the same in both. Does wood > correspond to something else? And the rest of them? > > Thanks > GB Khalsa HI GB check out Frank Ros's Lost Secrets of Ayurvedic Acupunture he gets into this in detail while these systems obviously have a common mother, over time the concepts have taken on slightly different meanings, and cover territories that don't always overlap to understand the correspondences its important to understand each system independently, and then draw the links between them to simply know Ayurveda and draw correspondences without really understanding TCM would be a mistake theoretical structures are fairly rigid entities, and thus to see the kind of synthesis that you suggest would call for some degree of flexibility in both, something probably won't happen given that belief structures often have nothing to do with actual experience, but rather, the conditioned interpretation of experience when people learn something in one way they are unlikely to do a reassessment until such time it becomes obvious - some might call this the "elusive obvious," to borrow a title from Moshe Feldenkrais nonetheless, in terms of practice, there are obvious correspondences between concepts like vata, pitta and kapha, and qi, yang and yin, respectively e.g. Tian Men Dong (Asparagus cochinchinensis), classified as a yin restorative, and Shatavari (Asparagus racemosa) for female reproductive disorders here an understanding of TCM concepts like yin, yang and qi restorative actually adds a whole new level of sophistication in choosing vajikarana and rasayana herbs best... Todd Caldecott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 GB and Robert Svoboda and Arnie Lade also wrote a book called "Tao and Dharma" which compares TCM and Ayurveda in diagnostics, 5 Elements, Yin Yang Theory, herbal treatments etc. best wishes, Claudia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 Namaste Todd: I am not sure what you mean by "having a common mother"; I think there are some similarities but both originated and evovled separately. > while these systems obviously have a common mother, over time the concepts have > taken on slightly different meanings, and cover territories that don't always overlap There are also similarities between the elements in Ayurveda and the description of doshas in medieval Western herbology books (I think there is one by Paracelsus). That Ayurveda could be a source for western medicine is not that far-fetched because a lot of western knowledge in medicine,astrology came from the Arabs who in turn got them from India. The source for the tattwas IMO is yoga and tantra. To any occultist, the elements are very real though not of the same nature as implied by the names. One of the most balancing things for the doshas is the tantric ritual of Bhutashuddhi (cleansing of the elements)- this is a very powerful meditation and the effects are almost as if one were on an ayurvedic diet. The tattwas and their corresponding sense organs can be constructively used to balance out any dosha. For instance a vata individual needs to have more of the earth element; for this he has to engage in deep breathing, while "smelling" the breath; this is many times more effective than just plain deepbreathing. When plagued by running thoughs and restlessness, "smelling" the breath has an instantenous calming effect. So in the case of ayurveda, the theoretical structure is itself devovled from experiential and intuitive knowledge of the sages. I am not competant enough to comment on TCM, though I have some doubts on some of their practices (eg- falling hair and greying hair is a consequency of poor circulation according to TCM, so the remedy could be ginko biloba, ginseng etc both which aggravate pitta and possible cause more hair loss) -yogaman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 Todd: Rhodiola is one of latest popular adaptogens. According to TCM it is balancing to both yang and yin; can this be intrepreted to mean that this is tridoshic as well? -yogaman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 On Thursday, June 24, 2004, at 06:00 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Message: 2 > Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:38:46 -0000 > "childofdevi" <childofdevi > Re: TCM and Ayurveda > > Namaste Todd: > > I am not sure what you mean by "having a common mother"; I think > there are some similarities but both originated and evovled > separately. Bon medicine contains elements that are very similar to both TCM and Ayurveda, and claims a lineage of teachings that extends back over 17,000 years, which predates both. Interesting that Bon originated in the Tibetan plateau, which exists between both India and China. But apart from this specific link, i am not alone in speculating that Ayurveda, TCM, ancient Egyptian medicine, and Unani medicine evolved from a common system. Historians like to present a version of history that is very much more isolationist than it perhaps was. For eg., few people are aware that there was a Greek (Unani) school of medicine in Beijing in the 11th cent. In the 6th cent CE vedic physicians lectured on medicine in Jundishapur, in Iran. Some claim that vedic astrology evolved from Hellenistic astrology brought by the Macedonians. Extending back even further, Sumerian seals have been found on Indian soil, indicating a significant trade in both commodities and ideas, dated circa Sarasvati civilization. Even if you do a cursory study of ancient India and Sumerian culture, there are many similarities, primarily in their division of different classes of healers: the brahmin/ashipu and the bhishaj/asu, the latter concerned with magico-religious rites, and the latter with herbal medicine and bone setting. There are also other similarities between ancient Indian and ancient Mesopotamian cultures, but i digress... the information is there for those that seek it > > I am not competant enough to comment on TCM, though I have some > doubts on some of their practices (eg- falling hair and greying hair > is a consequency of poor circulation according to TCM, so the remedy > could be ginko biloba, ginseng etc both which aggravate pitta and > possible cause more hair loss) alopecia is not a diagnostic classification in TCM, but is indicative of certain energetic patterns when other symptoms are present, e.g. alopecia could be a jjing, yin, yang or blood deficiency etc., depending on the symptomology besides which, if you knew anything of TCM you would know that the chinese don't use Ginkgo biloba except as the fruit, primarily in the treatment of asthma the use of the high-potency standardized flavonoid Ginkgo extract for cerebral ischemia and atherosclerosis is based on German studies that began in the early 1950's but this product doesn't bear anything close to the way the chinese use the nut, nor is it actually a "herbal" product further, i'm not sure where you come up with the idea that Ginkgo extract (or nut?) aggravates pitta did you find this in some traditional nighantu (impossible) or recent text on Ayurveda, or have you actually seen Ginkgo aggravate pitta in practice? i personally have never seen this, with both the standardized extract or a simple leaf (tincture) extract - just saying something is so doesn't make it as such lastly, some Ginsengs are excellent restoratives for paittika conditions, e,g. Panax quinquefolium (American Ginseng), which is clearly established as a yin restorative; look at the activities of San qi (Panax notoginseng) as a hemostatic in rakta pitta. etc etc. Caldecott todd www.toddcaldecott.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2006 Report Share Posted January 14, 2006 Hi Anna i think this has been discussed before- you can search the archives for "TCM" basically, nobody really knows for sure - its clear that TCM and Ayurveda are similar and also different, in a number of different ways, and thus there are no easy answers you need to look at the history of the cultures and their interaction with each other to discover the answer to your question, but much of this remains uncovered even still basically, you have an ancient people of india, some centered around the (now dry) ghaggar river system in northwest india, called the sarasvati civilization dating back to the 3rd millennium BCE or earlier - not much is known about this culture as we are still trying to decipher the script they used it is clear they had a very sophisticated society, similar to what has been found in harappa and moenjodaro (with sewers, flushing toilets and garbage collection) and certainly maintained a class of professional healers, but we don't really know if they practiced ayurveda per se - there is a debate among scholars about the whole "aryan" invasion - the same aryans ("noble ones") that brought the vedas with them - if the sarasvati people were dravidian, as some suspect, then they may have practiced something closer to siddha, although siddha now at least certainly seems very similar to ayurveda around the same time, China had the Yangshao and Lungshan peoples evolving an agrarian neolithic civilization, whose medicine was in large part shamanistic, with lots of ancestral appeasement and use of oracles the invention of medicine in China is attributed to the legendary Shen Nung, who is thought to have lived around this time, also inventing agriculture and somewhat accidently, black tea... when the sarasvati declined the apex of indian culture shifted to the northwest, in present day northern pakistan/afghanistan, which became great centers of medical learning in ancient india (e.g. takshashila university), as early as 800 BCE (pre-alexander/iskander) we also know that during this time there was a very large empire to north called zhang zhung, which stretched from modern day tibet into afghanistan and iran in the west, to mongolia in the north, and into some parts of china in the east interestingly enough, much of the zhang zhung culture is very similar with hinduism, and today both tibetans and indians revere the same gods/goddesses and sacred sites, e.g. mount kailash (what the bonpos call the mountain of the 9 svastikas), deep in tibetan territory north of the himalayas is the abode of lord shiva and and from where Lord Bharadvaja rec'd the divine knowledge of ayurveda - this and other features suggest that there was a lot of cultural intermingling between the two peoples, and that perhaps large parts of hindu culture were derived from the "aryans" of the zhang zhung (who also use this term, to refer to themselves...) besides sharing between india and zhang zhung, there was also some sharing between zhang zhung and china, but the relationship was more antagonistic (hence China's traditional resentment of tibet and subsequent invasion last century) - but there was some intermingling nonetheless, for e.g., pulse diagnosis is similar, and may have originated in zhang zhung culture (interestingly enough there was a greek/persian school of pulse diagnosis in beijing in the 11th cent AD) later, with the spread of buddhism into china, features of indian culture including medicine were brought into china, but if they were assimilated, they were given discrete characteristics so that they don't resemble the former - e.g. both TCM and Ayurveda have 5 elements, but they are different and have different qualities; TCM uses yin-yang, ayurveda speaks of soma-agni, etc etc. with ALL of this background you can see that it is difficult to say with certainty _who_ are the progenitors of ayurveda and related vedic sciences - factor into this the extensive colonization of SE asia (e.g. bali being one last example of this) by south indian mariners, meant there was also some mixing going on down south too, with some chinese herbs incorporated in the ayurvedic materia medica, e.g. chinese date, sarsaparilla etc. my own belief? i think that ayurveda as we know it today was inherited from the zhang zhung peoples, and comingled with pre- existing dravidian/indian practices as far as TCM and ayurveda, i also believe that the similarities exist between them because these were mediated through the zhang zhung culture, and later with the spread of buddhism into china sorry for the rush and typos but i had limited time to write this best... todd caldecott > Message: 11 > Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:59:09 -0000 > "radjfarkas" <radjfarkas > I am new to this group and this is my first question: > Did TCM (Traditional ) evolve from Ayurvedic medicine? > > Anna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.