...

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhagavatas:

It is unfortunate that an innocuous question has generated

such heated discussions and personal attacks.

This will be the last posting on the subject.

Further arguments etc may be carried on by private mails

of interested parties.

 

To avoid recurrence of such undesirable discussions

in the Journal site, we propose to bring out

an important policy decision and new Guidelines.

 

Moderator

==============================================================================

 

1)i dont know who gave "authority" to this person who makes these

kinds of comment in the forum.

2)i can smell some kind of "talibanism" in here.

3)it is so sick to know that even in SriVaishnavism u find "narrow

minded" people.

4)">Obviously Vinayaka is not a Vedic God and cannot enjoy the status

of God." This is an offending statement and i would like the person

to keep his opinion to himself and not "poison" people's minds.

 

thanx

 

ps: i dont think this reply will be posted. if its not posted then i

can say that this is not the real srivaishnava's forum!!!!

 

>Dear friends,

>Vinayaka was not worshipped in South India and does not find a place

>in the Tamil Sangam literature, I have the authority of Dr U Ve

>Swaminatha Iyer, the grand old man of the Tamil Language. He was

>imported into the Tamil Country in the time of the Pallava Kings of

>Kanchi (650 AD) .

 

>Obviously Vinayaka is not a Vedic God and cannot enjoy the status of

>God.

>Satakopan.