Guest guest Posted September 2, 1999 Report Posted September 2, 1999 jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH | The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA is very illuminating indeed. RukmiNi is an avataara of saakshaat SriH. We also say * rukmiNii satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *. Can somebody explain the Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa. With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on this list -- V.M.Sundaram Quote
Guest guest Posted September 5, 1999 Report Posted September 5, 1999 I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is considered a avataara of Bhuumaa devi. . Is there any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams? "Madhavakkannan, Vasudevan" wrote: > > Sri: > > Dear Sri Venkataraman, > > I was told in an upanyasam by Sri Krishna Premi that SathyabhAmA is an > avtaar of BhumA Devi. > > Narayana Narayana > > > > Venkataraman [sMTP:venkataraman] > > Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:34 PM > > bhakti > > Satyabhaamaa > > > > jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH | > > > > The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA is very > > illuminating indeed. > > > > RukmiNi is an avataara of saakshaat SriH. We also say * rukmiNii > > satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *. Can somebody explain > > the Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with > > RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa. > > > > With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on > > this list > > > > -- V.M.Sundaram Quote
Guest guest Posted September 6, 1999 Report Posted September 6, 1999 Dear Sri Venkataraman : At 04:15 PM 9/5/99 +0800, you wrote: >I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is >considered an avataara of Bhuumaa devi.Is there any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad >Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams? The largest set of references related to SatyabhAmA are in Srimadh Bhaagavatham. Here is one outside the PurANAs : KrishNa Upanishad distinct from GopAla Uttara Taapini Upanishad gives the connection of KrishNA to the people associated with Him , which is some what interesting & imaginative allegory : " Transcendent Knowledge was His adoptive mother, YasOdhA; PraNavam was His mother, Devaki ;The sacred verses of the scriptures were the cows and the cowherdesses;BrahmA became His staff used for grazing cows ; RudrA was His flute; the Rishis were thre trees ;AdhisEshA became BalarAmA;the 16,108 maidens (who played the game of Love with Him ) are the verses of the scripture which describe the nature of His immensity; Kindness became RohiNi(the Mother of BalarAmA); peace of mind was KuchElA;Truth ws Akrura; self-control was Uddhava; SATYABHAMAA WAS THE EARTH GODDESS , BHUMI DEVI . The references to SatyabhAmA in Srimadh BhAgavatham are at the following sections: Canto I.9.25-30: Marriage to SatyabhAmA and bringing the PaarijAthA tree to Dhwaaraka for her . Canto I.26.32-37: "Conceited " SatyabhAmA being unable to resist the charms of the Lord . Canto X.56.33-45 : Marriage of SathyabhAmA to KrishNA Canto X.59.9-10 : Slaying ofNarakAsura in SatyabhAmA's company. Canto X.59.39-40: PaarijAthA Tree abharaNam for SathyabhAmA Canto X.61:Ten sons of SathyabhAmA Canto X.83: Droupathi's Question to SatyabhAmA. These are the places , where SatyabhAmA as the consort of Sri KrishNA is mentioned in Srimadh BhAgavatham. V.Sadagopan Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.