Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

THE PLACE OF (other) PRACTICE IN ADVAITA VEDANTA

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dearest Frankji:

 

What a delight to hear from you! Here is another one you will enjoy.

 

Will send copies to RM and HS.

****************************

 

Mr. Evans Wentz: What does the Maharshi think of universal illusion (Maya)?

 

Bhagavan: What is Maya? It is only Reality.

 

Evans Wentz: Is not Maya illusion?

 

Bhagavan: Maya is used to signify manifestations of Reality. Thus Maya is

only Reality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

"frank maiello" <egodust

<advaitin>

Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:00 PM

Re: THE PLACE OF (other) PRACTICE IN ADVAITA VEDANTA

 

 

> advaitin, "Harsha" wrote

> [...]

>

> > W.Y. Evans Wentz: Does Maharshi enter the Nirvikalpa Samadhi?

> >

> > Bhagavan: If the eyes are closed, it is Nirvikalpa; if open, it is

> (though

> > differentiated, still in absolute repose) Savikalpa. The ever

> present state

> > is the natural state sahaja.

>

> hariH OM! harsha-ji, friends..

>

> leaving off on topic i'd been on since my last main postings, i think

> bhagavan's reference to the savikalpa state is of particular

> importance. (the rest is the essential teaching and becomes obvious

> in time.)

>

> implication once again that maya-shakthi is inscrutable, indescribable

> (anirvachaniya), cyclically eternal and unknowable. yet within it

> there's a relative meaning--no less than isvara as anthropomorphic

> conception of the saguna brahman Itself. implications further there

> is purpose in world, regardless if one does or doesn't practically

> support. no fault whatsoever.

>

> i would require much more time and space to present what i'm leading

> up to here. literally and figuratively with a double entendre thrown

> in! :-)

>

> the message is perhaps cryptic or i just gave a good imitation of

> professor irwin cory theorizing nothing. (that's a quick way out! :-)

>

> really, just wanted to say hi and namaste to all! you're forever in

> my thoughts.

>

> frank

>

>

>

>

>

> Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of

> Atman and Brahman.

> Advaitin List Archives available at:

> http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/

> To Post a message send an email to : advaitin

> Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages

>

>

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

--

> Links

>

>

> advaitin/

>

> b..

> advaitin

>

> c..

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dearest Frankji:

 

What a delight to hear from you! Here is another one you will enjoy.

 

Will send copies to RM and HS.

****************************

 

Mr. Evans Wentz: What does the Maharshi think of universal illusion (Maya)?

 

Bhagavan: What is Maya? It is only Reality.

 

Evans Wentz: Is not Maya illusion?

 

Bhagavan: Maya is used to signify manifestations of Reality. Thus Maya is

only Reality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

"frank maiello" <egodust

<advaitin>

Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:00 PM

Re: THE PLACE OF (other) PRACTICE IN ADVAITA VEDANTA

 

> advaitin, "Harsha" wrote

> [...]

>

> > W.Y. Evans Wentz: Does Maharshi enter the Nirvikalpa Samadhi?

> >

> > Bhagavan: If the eyes are closed, it is Nirvikalpa; if open, it is

> (though

> > differentiated, still in absolute repose) Savikalpa. The ever

> present state

> > is the natural state sahaja.

>

> hariH OM! harsha-ji, friends..

>

> leaving off on topic i'd been on since my last main postings, i think

> bhagavan's reference to the savikalpa state is of particular

> importance. (the rest is the essential teaching and becomes obvious

> in time.)

>

> implication once again that maya-shakthi is inscrutable, indescribable

> (anirvachaniya), cyclically eternal and unknowable. yet within it

> there's a relative meaning--no less than isvara as anthropomorphic

> conception of the saguna brahman Itself. implications further there

> is purpose in world, regardless if one does or doesn't practically

> support. no fault whatsoever.

>

> i would require much more time and space to present what i'm leading

> up to here. literally and figuratively with a double entendre thrown

> in! :-)

>

> the message is perhaps cryptic or i just gave a good imitation of

> professor irwin cory theorizing nothing. (that's a quick way out! :-)

>

> really, just wanted to say hi and namaste to all! you're forever in

> my thoughts.

>

> frank

>

>

>

>

>

> Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of

> Atman and Brahman.

> Advaitin List Archives available at:

> http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/

> To Post a message send an email to : advaitin

> Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages

>

>

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

--

> Links

>

>

> advaitin/

>

> b..

> advaitin

>

> c..

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...