Guest guest Report post Posted May 5, 2003 "paroissien" <peaceisit@a...> wrote: > dear harsha, > i spent more than two hours on this one > does "shravaNa-manana-dhyAna" mean that: > - jayji relies only on sacred books (a limited corpus) > - that he has an immortal soul and distinct from brahman > - but that there is a flaw in meditation because it relies > on an aspect of memory (like an individual soul would) > - if parabrahman is self-evident doesn't it show that this > evidence shines from one self? > - could advaita mean meditation on "unreal" or > "formless"; aren't we try as long as the enquiry keeps > meanings from dispersion thus active > (isn't the source of investigation it's end too?) > - i wonder why single-pointedness, self-enquiry, > concentration, attention on impulses and the tool it at least I am not alone Karta > represents is not mentionned in his message > i had some fun time with this one > please excuse my stubborn interference > this shravaNa-manana-dhyAna is new to me > in peace > eric > > > > > , professorhkl > <professorhkl@n...> wrote: > > My comments are at the bottom of the post. I will pass this on to > HS as > > well. > > > > Harsha Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
