Ananta Sesa

Really nice quote! Do you happen to know in which of the Upanishads?

Atheists say that God, to exist, must be unlimitedly complex, since He must be more complex than the universe itself...is that argument true?

There were not even any "Big Bang"...it´s just a fantasy-theory of the "scientists"...

What does Vedas say? If the Earth was created before the Sun (which btw both the Bible and Koran says), it basically proves that it´s the Sun which revolves around the Earth, and not the other way around, as we are "taught" in the "schools"! Any reference?

Thank you so much for dispelling my doubt!

So then Prabhupada was wrong when he wrote in the Gita that the light of the stars is the reflection of the Sun?

Somebody who knows?

The jiva is not eternal, conscious and blissful, in a spiritual body?

But isn´t the jivatma also consisting of sat-cit-ananda vigraha?

Lord Krishna is the source of all the energies; Antaranga, Tatastha and Bahiranga Sakti, but what about Himself; i.e. His form, His body? Is He Himself made of the same energy as Antaranga Sakti?

. If the memories are stored in the subtle intelligence, how come then that the memories can be impoved by taking chemical substances, ie. medicines, against Alzheimer´s disease? Isn´t that a proof that memories also are stored in the network of the neurones?

Thank You! The mind do not exist within the body? But the soul exists within the body? By the heart-chakra, or? The mind do not die even when one goes back to the spiritual world?

. If mind - what´s the function of brain, regarding thoughts? If brain - what´s the function of mind, regarding thoughts? Thoughts are generated by the soul, but then...?

. Btw, anybody who knows the REASON why all the planets (maybe with the exception of the Earth) and stars are spinning around their axis?

But here is scientific proof, from the new book "Galileo was Wrong", that we in fact live in a geocentric world: http://www.geocentrism.com/possible.htm http://www.geocentrism.com/assumptions.htm http://www.geocentrism.com/observations.htm http://catholicintl.com/products/books/gwwprint.htm http://reformation.org/stationary-earth.html VIDEO: "Mysteries of the sacred Universe": (48 min) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-538297875584368796 Heliocentrism is in fact only built on assumptions: http://www.fixedearth.com/Assumptions.htm Scientific reviews of the book "Galileo was Wrong": "There exists no better exposition of the history and science of geocentrism. Very highly recommended and a must for all those interested in the issues surrounding geocentrism today" - Gerardus Bouw, Ph.D., Astronomy "In their over 700-page book, Drs. Sungenis and Bennett make a convincing case for the special and central position of the earth in the cosmos" - Vincent Schmithorst, Ph.D., Physics "Galileo Was Wrong is a work of monumental proportion which ranks, in my opinion, on a par with the meticulous observations of the Danish astronomer, Tycho Brahe, and the tireless efforts of Walter van der Kamp" - Neville Jones, Ph.D., Physics "In their new book, Sungenis and Bennett take no prisoners...Now that the Enlightenment is over, it was inevitable that the system upon which it was based should come in for the powerful critique which Sungenis and Bennett provide. Not inevitable, however, was the brilliant way they provide it" - E. Michael Jones, Ph.D., ed. Culture Wars "Sungenis and Bennett examine the anomalies that arise from the Copernican model...A must read for those who can set aside prejudices and a priori assumptions" - Joseph Strada, Ph.D. Aerospace Engineering "The book Galileo Was Wrong forcefully addresses the history, science, theological, philosophical, and worldview implications of our place in the universe" - Russell T. Arndts, Ph.D., Chemistry, LSU "It is with pleasure that I remand this volume into the hands of the reader" - Martin Selbrede, Chief Scientist, Unipixel "Robert Sungenis and Robert Bennett have done a great service to science and to men of good will. Those who see the universe as the handiwork of the benevolent God need no longer be subservient to fairy tales" - Anonymous, Ph.D., MIT "Galileo Was Wrong is a model for the kind of scholarship we need today -- intellectual understanding not as an end in itself, but as a commitment to reality, infused with moral passion, love for the earth, common sense and philosophical sensitivity" - Caryl Johnston, M. Ed., Jefferson Medical College

I read in the book "Vedic Cosmology" by Danavir Goswami that the Earth actually is not spinning around its axis! But if not, how then to explain all the satellites orbiting the Earth, which are programmed according to the Earths supposed spinning...? And also astronauts who have gone to spaceflight missions, they all say that they could see the Earth spinning around its axis... If the Earth is NOT spinning around its axis, it would mean that all the stars in the universe are circling around the Earth ones EVERY DAY...sounds really far out!! I am a little bit in doubt, somebody who could clear this out? I have no difficulty believing in the geocentric model, that the Earth actually is in the middle of the universe, and the Sun and the planets are circling around the Earth, but that the stars are circling around the Earth each and every day... ANY COMMENTS?

That supposed Einstein-quote about Bhavad-gita is stated in millions of BBT:s books...which of course the atheists demand a source for!

Somebody who knows? Is there any source for this supposed quote from him?

But why do then Srila Prabhupada say in his books that there is past, present and future here in the material world?

So a jiva-soul can take the position of the demigod Shiva, in the same way as the jiva can take the position of the demigod Brahma?

But since pradhana still is manifested, it must mean that there always (for eternity) will be ome kind of "material cloud" in the spiritual sky, or?

I always thought that is when one comes at the age of puberty, around 12, when one starts to be responsible for one´s actions, and when one starts to commit sinful actions... OK then, around the age of 5, but is there any sastric evidence on this?

But then in that case, how can one say that there goes by 100 years before a new Brahma with 100 yrs of life comes along?

Some say around the age of 5, while others say around the age of 12... What´s the sastric truth in this matter? When does one become responsible for one´s actions?

If all the Universes dissolve when Maha-Vishnu inhales, and goes into His body, then the question is, is there still manifest during His inahalation the material space? If not, that would mean that there is no material world (no material space and time) what so ever during the inhalations of Maha-Vishnu...?