rprashar2002

I have read almost every respond to this posting. I 100% agree what everybody is saying. This Nehru family has done nothing but ruined our history. Even till today the history taught in our schools is wrong. Alexander the great was never great. He was defeated by a small king named Porus. Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple. Subhash Chander Bose's death was Nehru,s conspiracy. Kashmir issue is still there because of Nehru. Basically Nehru family was a family of misfits. Those are just a couple of examples. That is why whenever someone talk about the real history, they make him quite.

So it is upto us now. All the Hindu's should get together and wipe all those forces from our country.

But we are so tolerent that we are still so called Gandhi's, anyone can come and slap.

I am proud to be a Hindu bud I am so ashamed that we are not united. But time is coming. People are going to uproot Nehru and Gandhi's statues.

Nehru Family.pdf

Our own Nehru Family

Nehru Family.pdf

It is very true that Karan and Duryodhan were better than Arjun and Bhim but I think we are going away from the true meaning of the whole incident that it was a war of good and bad. Just because of Duryodhan, Karan never got that rechognition what Arjun and Bhim got.

Same thing happened in Ramayana. Ravan and his brothers were far educated and stronger than Ram and his brothers. But again Gods came to help Ram amd their alliance. Because it was a war of good and bad too and Ravan, his brother Kumbhkaran and his son Inderjit never got rechognized.

Inderjit himself has defeated Devas so many times.

So Called Nehru Family

Nehru Family.pdf

I AM YET TO BELIEVE THIS

 

Let's the TRUTH prevail.

 

This is unbelievable truth.

"The Moghul Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal built the Taj Mahal. It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by 20,000 artisans brought to India from all over the world. Many people believe Ustad Isa of Iran designed it." This is what your guide probably told you if you ever visited the Taj Mahal. This is the same story I read in my history

book as a student in India.

 

No one has ever challenged it except Professor P.N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz Mahal's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya).

 

In the course of his research, Oak discovered the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. Shah Jahan then remodeled the palace into his wife's memorial. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz's burial.

 

The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries begin with the name Taj Mahal. He says this term does not occur in any Moghul court papers or chronicles, even after ShahJahan's time. The term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any of the Muslim countries, from Afghanistan to Algeria.

 

"The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal is illogical in at least two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes. "Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building." Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo-Mahalaya, or the Shiva's Palace. Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists.

 

Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple palace dedicated to Shiva worshipped by the Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Professor Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan.

 

European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638(only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building long well before Shah Jahan's time. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum.

Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time, and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples. Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition with dire consequences. There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research. The current Indian government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under UN supervision, and let international experts investigate

Thanking You,

MAYUR DAVE,

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA

Congress has always damaged the Hindus. But we are so tolrent that anybody can come and loot us. It was congress(Indira Gandhi) who never Mr. Oak's book publish. Just because of Muslim vote bank. On the other side us(Hindus) more than 85% of the total population of so called Hindustan is so divided than nobody cares about us.

Nehru Family.pdf

Yes they were all jack asses. They were decoits not rulers. What did they do other than forceibly converting people and damaging their religious places. Alone Shahjhan has 5000 women in his haram. So you can think yourself how great he was. Now take a look at their followers. Problem everywhere, where ever they are. Still the same mantality.

Do you think Shah Jahan was an idiot?

 

If he remodeled a Hindu temple, why would he retain the 'Gods' in a locked room? He would have cleared everything away, which is what anyone with average brains would do. Similar nonsense is generated about Tirupathi too where the idol is actually that of Buddha, but the priests will not let anyone see that.

 

Muslims of India have been living in India for centuries now and they are just Indian as Hindus. One has to be really narrow-minded not to accept them as fellow Indians. These petty folks are the real trouble makers.

 

About the government covering up this alleged Hindu temple story for tourism, it is actually in their interest to uncover such a story, if there was one as this would multiple tourism two-fold. So that angle is incorrect too.

 

Use your brains people, do not be fooled by forbidden archaeology. It is for entertainment only and people should be aware of this truth.

 

Peace