ombakth

As per some people Ancient Angadesh was in current Bihar and some part of Bengal but in some buddhis's geography associated Anga in current China(Tibet) region. Karna was the king of Anga(China), a country, according to the Buddhist's geography associated with China, but according to other scholars, Sri Lanka [ See Anga: 'Geography of Early Buddhism', by Bimala Churn Law, Bhartiya Pub., House, by Shri V.S. Singh Varanasi, India. p. 6-8 ]. This shows that Anga Desh was actually a part of current China(Entire Himalayan region of Tibet). In Ancient time entire Himalayan Range along with Tibet Plateau belonged to India while China was a small country towards the eastern end of the current China. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p> </o:p> Actual china's map during Ming dynasty in 1580<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6e/Ming_foreign_relations_1580.jpg<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> There was also a place called Karn in ancient arab. Even it might be one of the place that he had conquered at that time. Karna(Qarnaw) "the land is inhabited by four great peoples: first the Mineans, (inhabitants of Main) with their capital Karna (Qarnaw). http://azaalcity.com/history.htm Karna name presence in Arabia<o:p></o:p> 11<SUP>th</SUP> Century B.C.E. land routes through Arabia were greatly improved by Sumerians and Arabs wanting to trade with people of the west using the camels as a beast of burden. Frankincense was carried from its production centre at Qana (now known as Bir 'Ali) to Gaza in Egypt. The camel caravans also carried gold and other precious goods which arrived in Qana by sea from India. The chief incense traders were the Minaeans. The Minaean kingdom, which lasted from about 1200 to 650 BC, wads prosperous and whose prosperity was due mainly to the trade of frankincense and spices. Trade brought civilization. They established their capital at Karna (now known as Sadah). In 950 BC another people of Arabia called the Sabaeans took over. Prosperity attracted onlookers who waited in hiding for the right chance to take over controls. The fighting develops in who gets how much from the trades. This breaks the tight tribal bonds and a new group comes in a takes over everything. This will be a major factor in the future retreat back to obscurity for the Arabs. <o:p></o:p> “The Minaean kingdom, which lasted from about 1200 to 650 BC, wads prosperous and whose prosperity was due mainly to the trade of frankincense and spices. Trade brought civilization. They established their capital at Karna (now known as Sadah).”<o:p></o:p> http://michaelreport.com/history/east/arabs/arabs.html Some say that Salah is Mahabharata's Karna http://www.domainofman.com/forum/index.cgi?noframes;read=40 Ancient Arabians used to practice Idol worship and they had closed trade relations with India, they even shared common culture. Minaean Kingdom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaean Sabean Kingdom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabaeans <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> Ancient Greater India.</o:p> <o:p>Greater India is another term sometimes used to describe the region between Central Asia in the North and tropical Indonesia in the South, and from the borderlands of Persia to Tibet and western China, which has had a significant Indian influence on its culture and civilization, including religious thought, language, art and literature. </o:p><o:p></o:p> <o:p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undivided_India</o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Indian_cultural_zone.svg</o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p>Hence there is large possibilities that Huns and Khans are descendants of Angraj Karna.</o:p>

In ancient times Population were grouped into caste inorder to generate statistical calculations and for the maintaining the economy but later on people started discriminating others on the bases of their caste. This is the reason why even people from Lower caste used to get higher position depending upon their caliber and people of higher caste were kicked out if the lacked effectiveness or qualities. <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region><st1:place>India</st1:place></st1:country-region> was the only country which has the oldest Republic even during the times when Romans used to say in Tents, so it is obvious that we had that statistical knowledge even at that time due to which population was divided into groups called caste.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> Also Veda means subject it is nothing to do with caste system. Also, some low caste people say that they have been humiliated since long time, this is wrong. There is no low caste people at all in ancient Indian Dharma it was created by brahmins. How pope and caliph spoiled their repective religion so brahmin spoiled ours. Sadhus and Rishi are real ascetics people of our land and no one else. Most of the low caste people are nothing but the people who were defeated in war. They were also soldier just because they were defeated in war they had become salves and hence low caste or outcaste. Suppose if they would have defeated others then even they would have been high caste and the people whom they have defeated will have been low caste or outcaste. Why farmers and traders were not considered as outcaste or low caste. The Low caste people are actually defeated and conquered warriors. Even when they ruled they might have defeated some one or the other. There is nothing called caste system in India. India is one. Everyone should respect India. Nowadays people hardly know whether a person next them is of a low caste or a not but when low caste people themselves keep on announcing that they are of low caste them obviously even younger generation will come to know that the person next to him is of low caste or he himself is of low caste. Why can’t everyone both people from Higher caste and people from Lower caste eliminate the word low caste from Indian Dharmic religion. Historical Famous Backward Class Warriors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backward-caste_Hindu_Warriors Historical Famous Backward Class Saints. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backward-caste_Hindu_Saints All them were devoted to strengthen Ancient Indian Dharma or Hinduism. Buddhism does not reject entire ancient Veda. http://www.teosofia.com/Mumbai/7101wisdom.html A working class empowers and strengthens the nation. All those who work from Hight caste to Low caste are considered as working class. From capitalist to communist are considered as working class. A human is born to work. A CEO is also a worker a Garbage cleaner is also a worker. The Owner of a company is also a worker a labourer of that company is also a worker.

Kunti Kunti had a mantra that she can call any God and ask blessing from them, this does not means that she conceived her children from the Gods who she called by reciting the mantra. The children were born from Pandu’s genes which she conceived before Pandu was cursed like for e.g. suppose kunti had conceived genes from Pandu on night and next morning Pandu was cursed hence she recited the mantra so that the genes that she had conceived from Pandu on earlier day should develop into an embryo. Also, Pandu used to know Kunti before marriage and she had conceived from Pandu himself but because they were not married at that time this was the reason why she disowned karna. It takes 9 months of an embryo to develop into a human child and after conceiving Karna, kunti and Pandu might have been separated for a longer duration as Pandu might have not known about Karna because he was busy in his campaign. Later on as Pandu was dead so there was no one else to standby her side and give the proof of Karna’s inheritance from Pandu hence she maintained silence on this issue. She has taken blessing from Four Gods and Even Madri had taken Blessing from 2 Gods and not intercourse like nowadays when couples go to Temple when they don't have children from long time that does not means that means that go to seek blessing and nothing other than that no phsyical contact with idols. Draupadhi Actually had only one husband It can be possible because even in Mahabharat most of the time Sri Krishna was with one Pandava at a time either Yudishtra, Bheem, Arjun, Nakul and Sahadev. During Mahabharata ware he was with Arjun but sometimes he was with Yudhistra when he had asked him to tell a lie that Ashvathama is dead. While fighting with Jarasandh Sri Krishna and Bheema were together. It can be possible that Yudishtra, Bheem, Arjun, Nakul and Sahadev are the name of only one person may be Pandava. Since no person has got all the qualities whereas Pandava had that qaulities hence they might be refering him as five different people sometimes even today when see a fat man we say that "laghta hai dus admiyo ka kana katha hai" that does not means that he has ten head or has ten stomachs. The another reason for this is that in Indonesian culture there is reference of Mahabharata with Druapadhi having one husband and as Indonesians were also Hindus at one point of time before they migrated into Indonesian continent.. Rakshahas Clan were human race who used to practice Cannibalism There are few human tribes who bury their deads, few human tribes who burn their deads but there also another group of human tribes who eat their deads. Such culture is followed in some in primitive tribals some of them hailing in Africa (Not all Africans) and in Rakshahas clan of this subcontinent who ate other humans. Hence Rakshahas were humans but they ate humans. This act of eating ones own specie is called cannibalism. Those who practice such culture justify themselves whereas such things are not good for a civilized society. It is a sin of eating another human whether dead or alive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0810201.html Even the Aghori sadhus practice Cannibalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghori Necrophagy is the act of feeding on corpses or carrion. The word is derived from Ancient Greek "nekros" meaning corpse or dead and "phagos" meaning to eat. Animals who partially or completely feed on dead animals are usually called scavengers, most familiar examples being hyenas and vultures. Also many insects use decayed matter as a protein source, e.g. some bee species or dung beetles. With regard to carrion from the same species, the behavior is also referred to as anthropophagy, in the case of humans, or cannibalism, in the case of other non-human animals. In humans, necrophagy is a taboo in most societies. In the Qur'an slanderers are stigmatized as those who eat the flesh of the dead body of the person they slander. The Aghori, a Hindu sect known to live in graveyards, according to a Persian source and nineteenth century British accounts, were necrophagous. There have been many instances in history, especially in war times, where necraphagy was a survival behavior Hence some of the Africans are called Negros not because they are black but they used to pratice cannibalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necrophagy Hence, Rakshahs were not any mythological character but they were mere humans who used to follow cannibalism. Race is just a deformation and formation of skin pigments: Some blonde(White race) people consider themselves as the one belonging to higher value are actually wrong, just like how black color of skin is a deformity of melanin even white color of skin is a deformity of melanin. God does not discriminate people on the basis of the religion hence most of the religious founders from Gautam Buddha to Jesus were from the mixed race. Hence being white, black or brown is not a honor or disgrace living like a human should be considered as pride and degraded human value should be considered as disgrace. Non Veg and Veg debate: Actually, religions like Jainism which stresses on Veg food so that living beings are not harmed but even trees and plants from whom they receive food are also living beings. Then how can they eat plants and fruits. They don’t eat egg stating that by eating egg they are killing unborn chicken but in general egg that non vegs eat is that part of a hen which is not capable of developing a chicken hence indirectly they are eating non living egg and not fertile egg. In reality it is not wrong to eat non living things. Hence by eating egg they are not doing any sin to any living organism. Some say that those who eat non veg are prone to be violent. This is wrong. For, e.g. Elephant it does not eat non veg thing but still it becomes and violent and massacres fields and any Humans coming in it’s way. Take for e.g. Pigeon it eats small insects and worms but still it does not becomes violent. Parashuram: Parashuram was present in Ramayana and even in Mahabharata and there is lot of gap between of era between Ramayana and Mahabharata, then how did Parashuram survived such a long period. The answer to this is that the Parashuram of Ramayana and Parashuram of Mahabharat were two different people as per today’s generation you can consider that Parashuram was a Surname and not the firstname of an Individual like suppose take a Surname Bachchan there are many Bahchan’s of older generation and Bachchan’s of current generation but still you can group hem as Bachchan a single entity. Parashuram was a shraman and not a brahman, brahmans were not allowed to kill by themselves though they missued their position and one who kills was outcasted. Parashuram was a Shraman and he did not liked any one who misuses his duties and his position in the society due to which he killed many corrupt kings to bring law and order.

Dharmasthana: A new temple called Dharmasthana should be formed for Aum(Om) the one and only one formless God of Ancient Indian Dharma from whom all gods originated and into whom all god reside. It should reside on the center of the country. OM image link which can be used inplace of OM idol. A full length black board or a cloth to depict universe with this image of Aum(Om) depicting a light in that darkness approximately the height of one wall of Aum(Om) OM Temple. http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/562/omblueinplaceofidollw2.jpg Suggestion for New Reviwed Flag of ancient Indian Dharma http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/4747/indiandharmflagup7.jpg One and only one formless God Aum(Om)(Dharmic creator of all Gods in Hinduism, Christanity, Protestians, Islam, Sufism, Buddhism, Jainism, Bahai, Shikism, Zorastrians and other religions and cultures of world.) Nationality Indian Religion Induism(Just a Vastu alternate name of same Hindusim and name of the ancient Dharmic Religion of Indigenous People of India from which Hindiusm, Jainism, Buddhism and Shikism was formed and Religion of Indigenous people of world from which Christanity, Protestians, Islam and Sufism was formed which will unite both Brahmans and Dalits with equal respect but as common man without any special status for any tribes all with equal status) Even we should recite Aum(Om) four(Early Morning, Afternoon, Evening, Midnight) times a day and louder than what Muslims recite Azaam. Recite Aum(Om) gives mental peace.

All greatest scientist of Europe who changed the history of Europe have firm belief that Indians were more intelligents and also advanced in ancient times and as everyone know that Scientist did not believe anything thing without properly analysing things, so this proves that India was really a great nation. http://www.theholidayspot.com/indian_independence_day/quotes.htm We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made. Albert Einstein. India is the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend and the great grand mother of tradition. Mark Twain. If there is one place on the face of earth where all dreams of living men have found a home from the very earliest days when man began the dream of existence, it is India. Frech scholar Romain Rolland. India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border. Hu Shih.(Former Chinese ambassador to USA) what the Mainstream Technical Education univesities teach is entirely useless. They teach core computers for Mechanical Engineers when the concept of Mechanical Engineer should be something else for e.g. Mechanical Engineer should be taught only basic use of computers and CAD which will help in their Mechanical Drawing teaching C, C++ and other programing language is just baseless for Mechanical stream. Western countries are leading because of their Software skills generally done by us and Japan and other Eastern countries are emerging because of their Technical skills. If we develop both Technical and Software skills in India then we can lead both Western and Eastern Countries and gain our monopoly in education and skills field just like ancient times of Nalanda university etc. All stream should be given more importance for the development and welfare of our country. Today Technician are treated like as low people whereas Engineers are respected more even though they do not have Indept knowledge of their own field for e.g. today a Mechanical Engineer does not knows welding instead of that he knows C, C++. A Computer Engineer does not knows to assemble a computer he just knows outdated programing knowledge. A mechanical student should be taught indept of mechanics even welding. A computer student should be taught indept of computers even assembling and chip level so that one day we can make our own processors and compete with Intel Processors. Hence a new stream should be started called Technical so that they are treated with respect like other streams. The degree should be made standard throughout India and widely accepted. Just like how A+ and N+ private degree is recognized thoughout world for computer hardware and computer network. For e.g. Computer Technician(Both computer hardware and software included to compete with A+ and N+ courses) Electronic Technician. Electrical Technician. Mechanical Technician(Automobile Engineering included with Automobile Technical). The entry of this courses should not depend on our previous qualification even school dropouts should be allowed to do these courses. Perhaps he failed in school because he was not good in maths or other subject but he has the skills to design new age cars by visualizing and analyzing hence can do Mechanical course. But when we complete these Technical courses our standards will be much more than current Engineers and people will treat us with respect. Just like how industrial revolution tool place in Europe due to which their standards increased. If these courses are cetified by IGNOU will make this technical courses as mainstream courses. Diploma and Engineer Degree combined in Technical courses with IGNOU certified. Hence Technical will have higher priority than Engineering courses and anybody can join Technical courses by paying fees and no other restrictions of previous qualification. It will be amazing if embedded and chip level course is also added to computer engineering so that one day we can produce our own processor and India can lead world in all streams.There should be certified examination like IES, ITI, ATI exams along with ITES and also,AMIE given equal weightage to the B.E. degree so that again India becomes a pool of knowledge like the ancient Nalanda university. It will be amazing if embedded and chip level course is also added to computer engineering so that one day we can produce our own processor and India can lead world in all streams. Also, India should have a common education system through the country and not state wise. This will also help in uniting different culture of India.

Death Rituals and Donating organs for helping in the development human race. Some of the human tribes burn their dead and some bury their dead and others follow different Death rituals but why can’t we standardize that any one who dies he has to donate his organs before Last rituals are performed this will help few disabled people to gain organs like eyes, lungs etc.. It should be a duty of humanity to donate their organs to others until genetical science does not develops in which limbs can be grown from the human body even after they are accidentally cutoff like how branches of tree or a plant grow. This can be possible by cloning, if we can clone individuals why cannot we clone an individuals arms and re-grow the arm or any other electronic limbs that is controlled directly from the brain and function like normal organs. All Sadhus, Swami, Gurus, Acharyas, Rishis and Monks should initiate the process of Each and Every single Organ Donation rather than just burning or burying our dead bodies so that more and more handicap people can get organs. So that even after death our bodies can be used for Noble cause.

Some practices though being for noble cause can be misused by some corrupt and evil people hence such practices should be avoided. Biksha:- Though this was a good practice when ancient monks used to go house to house for alms but in current world many people having taken up beggar as their birth right. Hence they are always reluctant to any developmental work. Some people can give excuse that even ancient monks used to practice Biksha but that Biksha is different from today’s Bhik(Begging). They used to take food and clothing in the name of Biksha and not money. Today there are many people who had made Begging as a profession where local goons force children to beg for which they even cut their limbs. Hence instead of giving money to beggars people should give them food to eat now these food items are of no use for local goons hence they won’t further abduct and force children for such an act of begging. Some people misunderstand the Biksha(Donation) and Bhik(Begging). Samadhi:- At one point of time it is was the source to attain salvation but there are many other monks like Gautam Buddha who have proved that salvation can be attained even without Samadhi. In current generation Samadhi can be misused by certain people in the form of suicide. Hence even this practice of Samadhi should be stopped for the betterment of humanity. Just like how some evil people like terrorist misuse holy war to spread terrorism, in the name of Holy war they are spreading and imposing their rules and regulations. Holy war means war against evil system and ritual, no humans should harm another human that too who are not interested in fighting with others. Sacrifice:- At point of time sacrifice was used to return gratitude to the god for the favor that has been done to human. But now days some cruel people sacrifice children and animals for pleasing God. God has asked Abraham to sacrifice his son just to test Abraham’s loyalty towards him. God did not allowed Abraham to sacrifice his son. God does not asks any one to sacrifice. If at all God needed sacrifice then he can do by himself by sending natural calamity like earthquake and Tsunami there is no need for humans to impose their rules and regulations on other humans to sacrifice their feeling on the behalf of God. Gautam Buddha and Swami Vardhman had proved that without sacrifices also one can attain salvation. Nakedness:-Regarding the nakedness and clothing. Mahavira Swami did had some of his disciples who use to wear clothes. Wearing just a piece of cloth does not means attachment to desire but wearing heaving costly garments, ornaments to show off and when new design garments come then try to buy them means attachment to desire. Even skin is the like a garment to our internal organs then does that means that even we have to shed of our skin and if we don’t shed it off then does that means that we are so deeply attached to our skin that we forget our duties. Even caste system might be made in the ancient times just to get population census for that times ruling kings, so that they can plan their strategies regarding the investment of resources but later on it became an evil practice for societies when people became avoiding people of low caste, by some saint and kings who were at highest position. Similarly some corrupt minded people can misuse the pure concept of nakedness without desire, I am not referring to holy hindu sadhus and jain saints. But you cannot completely disagree that some people can misuse, just like some sadhus misuse their holy status to fulfill their evil desire. But as a whole the main purpose of swami Mahavira becoming a Jain will undermine, his main idea was to unite people and show them the path to leave in Harmony. Spreading equality and peace is also one of the teaching of Swami Mahavira why it is given less patronage then not wearing clothes or wearing clothes is given, if equality was not given less patronage then why there is Digambara and Swetambara. Why they are different? Why there are not united? I apologize to say that due to these difference the main concept of spreading the principles of Swami Mahavira had to some extent reduced. No body wants to make an effort to give importance to the main concept like equality and peace whereas people are giving more importance to nakedness. “Thus Mahavira became homeless. As he was leaving the garden, a Brahmin beggar, who had missed out on the last year of Mahavira's almsgiving, asked him for alms; he gave him half of the garment on his shoulder. After thirteen months he gave up clothes altogether.” After thirteen months he gave up clothes altogether that means till thirteen months he use to wear some or the other clothes probably he might have abandon the clothes generally humans in a town or a city wear and he might have started wearing leaves or hay around him just like the tribal human. Because even if today in any city if we as a urban human wear just leaves or clothes like thing make of hay then people around us might taunt us or question us as “Where are your clothes?” that means that they consider a leaves or clothes like thing made up of hay as a garment. By saying that swami Mahavira broke the old traditions, I meant that he had revolutionized that era when people use to discriminate between high caste and low caste people. He did broke the age old ancient tradition of our society called caste system which had become unhealthy environment of common people. In the same manner after some years some people can misuse such holy concept of nakedness like some sadhus do, I don’t want to elaborate on such things becomes some people without thinking or analyzing anything will feel offended they will feel that it will hurt their religious issues if such issues are discussed, hence I would like to clarify that I am not referring to all sadhus. I am referring to corrupt sadhus like Chandraswami who is being jailed, again I am not referring to any other Chandra swami, I don’t know whether there is any other saint whose name is similar to Chandraswami that I am referring to who is being jailed. It ancient times even when a person was just covered by short dhoti to cover his genital he was still considered as Nagna because full covered meant covered from top to both. Hence when Swami Mahavira had given away his richly princely garments people might have said that he had become naked because there is no evidences that he never ever whore a short piece of cloth to cover the lower half of the body because in those days the low class people use to wear just a small dhoti or lungoti type of clothes to cover the genitals hence it could be possible that Swami Mahavira might be wearning a small dhoti like or Lungoti like garment around his lower half of the body. Howerver, the question of him wearning or nor wearning anything is not more important. The important thing is to spread his ideas and message of peace. In ancient even many Hindu Shadus used to wear lungotis(small cloth) some groups of citizens at that time might be considering those monks who where lungots as naked for e.g. if today a person walks on a street wearing an underwear then people passing by may call out that “Who dekho nanga jar aha hai” however that person is wearing an underwear but he is still considered as Naked hence in the same way Swami Vardhman might be wearing a lungoti or used to cover genitals with bush or leaves somewhat like tribal dress. In today’s generation because if an corrupt monks like Chandra Swami becomes a Digambar monk then he can misuse the concept of nudity to fulfill his evil desire. So that the self respect of a woman is maintained for not looking at any other naked man then her husband.

Indian is now the land of Indigeneous people and not the land of Indus. Many cultures were poured into India . India is like a noah's ship wherein all humans, animals, different climates and lands are present. The Gods very own creation. There are some countries that are entire snowfall region, some countries are entire desert region and some countries are entire rainfall region. But India has it all Snowfall region, Desert Region, Rainforest Region, Coastal Region, Mountain Region, Plateau region and Plain Region. Hence India is the Land of Indigeneous people and Indigeneous landshape. Hence India derived from INDI- Geneous A- Genius people who have the ability think and analyze before acting. Hence Indian Dharma is Dharma of Indigenous people. Hence Hinduism is the Dharma of Indigenous people. If you want to maintain Hinduism as Nationality you can rename the religions as Indi(Sounds like Hindi language), Indo(Sounds like Hindu, if this selected then Indonesians will have to change their nation’s name back to Java Dwipa), Indies(If this is selected then West Indies will have to change back to Carribian) anything else as you like but a common one still it will remain ancient Indian Dharma. Just like how different tribes of that time were united and made Hinduism with trinity hence different religions of current world (Hinduism, Christanity, Protestians, Islam, Sufism, Buddhism, Jainism, Bahai, Shikism, Zorastrians and other religions and cultures of entire world) can be merged and create Indiusm or Indoism or Indiesium just changing the alphabet of Hinduism as per Vastu. Both meaning the same ancient Dharma. One and only one formless God Aum(Om)(Dharmic creator of all Gods in Hinduism, Christanity, Protestians, Islam, Sufism, Buddhism, Jainism, Bahai, Shikism, Zorastrians and other religions and cultures of world.)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Nationality Indian<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Religion Induism(Just a Vastu alternate name of same Hindusim and name of the ancient Dharmic Religion of Indigenous People of India from which Hindiusm, Jainism, Buddhism and Shikism was formed and Religion of Indigenous people of world from which Christanity, Protestians, Islam and Sufism was formed which will unite both Brahmans and Dalits with equal respect but as common man without any special status for any tribes all with equal status) <o:p></o:p> <o:p>Even we should recite Aum(Om) four(Early Morning, Afternoon, Evening, Midnight) times a day and louder than what Muslims recite Azaam. Recite Aum(Om) gives mental peace. </o:p>

Baptism or Conversion is just like application form whoever baptizes to any religion is indirectly following Ancient Indian Dharmic Religion. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In ancient times whenever a student used to join a school they used to be baptized in today’s scenario when you join a education institute or bank you fill in an application form hence baptization was like application form. Baptizing does not means conversion to particular religion. Every after being baptize one can follow his previous religious habbits. As all religion was formed from Indian Dharma. Even Christanity and Islam is indirectly developed from Indian Dharma so even if anybody is baptized to any religion like Christanity or Islam that person is indirectly Baptized to Indian Dharma. Hence there is no use in Baptizing people. This is the reason why a person born Hindu is a Hindu that person does not has to be Baptized to be a Hindu, this proves that Hinduism is much more advanced then other religion. <o:p></o:p>

Khajurao is not cultural Heritage Khajurao was not made by taking unanimous acceptance by all the ruling class or major population living in that era. Khajurao is not a heritage or a culture. Our culture was created by merger of various tribes and sects living in that era. hence there are various practices persistent even today all of us don't accept Khajurao. The one who ordered and created Khajurao had never asked any permissions or had never asked suggestions from other section of the society or remaining population before building Khajurao. Whoever had built Khajurao is soley responsible for it not the rest of us. Don't be under the impression that Khajurao is our heritage. It is just like a sex novel or the contents of triple x movies displayed or jotted down on the walls by some ultra open section of the society for whom sex was just fun. Sex is phenomenon in which one individual reproduces to continue his species. It is not bad or wrong but it should not be a public display. The obscene sculptures on Khajurao Temple wall should be removed and in place of that Statues depicting entire story of Ramayana, Statues depicting life story of Gautam Buddha and Statues depicting life story of Mahavir Vardhman should be carved onto the Khajurao walls. Why do we consider what foreigner's do is a modern approach? First humans used to live without clothes and later on they started wearing clothes to cover oneself.. so at that point wearing clothes to cover oneself was a modern approach and considered as the phase of development. And some are wearing revealing clothes and gradually it is becoming smaller and smaller and one day again back to basic no clothes and they name it as modernity. For early humans covering oneself was called modernity and for coming generation wearing less clothes is called modernity just because foreigners are doing so. Why not the foreigners consider themselves to be modern by stopping kiss in their movies? Why we are following them in everything why can't they follow us? We were the first one to stay in two to three storeyed housing blocks/building in Indus Valley era 3300–1300 BC, 2600–1900 BC and that time these so could foreigners used to stay in caves, tents and on top of tree. excavated ruins of mohenjo-daro http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en... A computer-generated reconstruction has brought a small area of Mohenjo-daro back to life. (Lost Civilizations by Austen Atkinson, p. 179 - 188) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co... While going up and down the city in train many at time we come across people doing shit on the tracks why do we feel embarrassed at that time even that may be a first step to modernization and shameless exposure. People will consider this trend as modern only after foreigner's start doing shit on the track then even we will consider it as an modern approach. From nakedness we started wearing clothes it was modernization. Now from normal clothes to more advanced something like protective cover type of sci-fi clothes can be considered as modernization and not revealing clothes. Revealing clothes or nakedness are supposed to be categorized as de-modernization. Modernity should be in thoughts like lifting poor and economical backward class, eradicating race differences and uniting back into Ancient Indian Dharma, abolishing mal practices like Dowry, Stringent action against “Rape and communal violence”. Developing science so that artificial limbs which can be directly controlled by brain and function like normal limbs can be created for helping the handicaps and stopping begging culture. We should understand that foreigner's are ones who are giving our things back to us. We had suniya before them and later on they came up with another name for it as zero. English was derived from Germanic language group and has Latin loan words was indirectly developed from Brahmi which was developed from Indic script, which even Ashoka used to use at his time so that means as those days we were more modern then them. Brahmi scripts have similar letters to Latin and to some extent to English not devnagri that we are using today to write Hindi. We could conclude that English indirectly originated from Brahmi. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...

Soul is an Engery<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> All souls have come from a main source and these souls take a form of living beings. The souls keeps on changing form but a individual is a combination of a particular soul and a body. When this soul leaves the body and takes another form then it is not the same individual it becomes another individual hence the new individual does not remembers about the previous past of the soul. The previous past is of that soul and not of that new individual. Soul is like a energy it is neither created nor destroyed it changes forms. In scientific terms they are chemicals which combine together to form a soul the energy. This soul is not capable of thinking anything without a body because the body has the brain. When a soul and a body combines it becomes a individual but when the same soul combines without another body it becomes another individual similarly when a body combines with a soul it becomes a particular individual and when it combines with another soul it becomes altogether different individual. Just like <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place>Battery</st1:place> which has a energy like soul and the metal body of battery like body, when the energy gets over the <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> dies during the life of the battery the energy is converted to different form probably to light the Torch. Similary the soul takes different forms even the body no one has past life until and unless the same soul and the same body combines but body gets decomposed hence it gets mixed up with soil hence same combination of material cannot be easily combined to create the same body hence eventhough a body is anyhow be made it is not likely that the same soul or the part of the soul again run the body because after being converted to other energy form may light or sound it is not possible that they combine together again if they combine then it will be a rare combinations because even the genealogy should combine hence nobody has past life or future life, every one has only one life to attain kevalya the ultimate truth or knowledge. All energies light, sound, chemical and soul ultimately merge to the main source of energy which people called GOD the ultimate source of energy. <o:p> </o:p> All souls have come from a main source and these souls take a form of living beings. The souls keeps on changing form but a individual is a combination of a particular soul and a body. When this soul leaves the body and takes another form then it is not the same individual it becomes another individual hence the new individual does not remembers about the previous past of the soul. The previous past is of that soul and not of that new individual. Soul is like a energy it is neither created nor destroyed it changes forms. In scientific terms they are chemicals which combine together to form a soul the energy. This soul is not capable of thinking anything without a body because the body has the brain. When a soul and a body combines it becomes a individual but when the same soul combines without another body it becomes another individual similarly when a body combines with a soul it becomes a particular individual and when it combines with another soul it becomes altogether different individual. Just like <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> which has a energy like soul and the metal body of battery like body, when the energy gets over the <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> dies during the life of the battery the energy is converted to different form probably to light the Torch. Similary the soul takes different forms even the body no one has past life until and unless the same soul and the same body combines but body gets decomposed hence it gets mixed up with soil hence same combination of material cannot be easily combined to create the same body hence eventhough a body is anyhow be made it is not likely that the same soul or the part of the soul again run the body because after being converted to other energy form may light or sound it is not possible that they combine together again if they combine then it will be a rare combinations because even the genealogy should combine hence nobody has past life or future life, every one has only one life to attain Moksh the ultimate truth or knowledge. The energy used in Tube light might be once a part of living giving energy called soul. A soul alone cannot think, cannot feel or cannot understand. Similarly, a body alone cannot think, cannot feel or cannot understand. But when both soul and body combine to form a individual then that individual can think, that individual can feel and that individual can understand. Once a soul separates from body memories are washed away as the memories that Individual had was the combination of that soul and that body. Hence no past life of an Individual. The soul splits from the body and again in atmosphere it again gets splits and gets merged with different energy or different part of another soul energy resulting into a altogether different entities and so does the body the body particles are converted into fossil and other substances. All energies light, sound, chemical and soul ultimately merge to the main source of energy which people called GOD the ultimate source of energy.

As per science world was created by a big explosion called Big Bang As per Dharmic Religion there was sound in the Universe called Aum(Om) from where entire universe was created hence Aum(Om) is equivalent to Big Bang so Aum(Om) is the scientifically proved creater of this universe and hence Aum(Om) is the one and only one formless God. As per Bible Adam and Eve were the first couple from whom Human's originated but as per Darwin Human's originated from Ape. As per Bible if Adam and Eve were the first couple then from where their children got their wives either they married their sister but this union cannot hail good children then if you consider Darwin's theory then it is quite understandable that along with Adam and Eve there are few other human's born and so now it is quite obvious that children's of Adam and Eve might have got their wives from other humans. But if other humans were present during Adam and Eve then how Adam and Eve are said to be the first couple. Either Bible is right or Darwin is right? Both are right 50 percent. There is a Dharmic answer for this puzzle. Adam and Eve were indeed to the first humans. As per Darwin there was genetical revolution that was taking places wherein "Half Human and Half Ape" like beings did exsist for some period. During this period or span of time a full human like kid Adam was born to one of these “Half Human and Half Ape” like couple as the child Adam looked somewhat different or a mutant to their parents hence he might be abandon or his parents might have died. But the evolution still continued female mutant from the existing another “Half Human and Half Ape” couple was created who was called as Eve there is a possibility that these mutants were abandon from their Ancestors. But as the Evolution still continued and more mutants of such kind derived from these “Half Human and Half Ape”. Hence Cain might have got his wife from one such couple. Perhaps another male mutant Bdam was born after an hour when Adam was born to some other “Half Human and Half Ape” if you conclude this then still Adam remains the first Human male similarly Eve their might be possibility that another female mutant Bve might have born after an hour or so hence Eve remains the first Human female. There could be also possibility that the “Half Human and Half Ape” like beings have purposely abandon their mutant children because they might have sensed genetical Evolution as even they were born mutant to some species for e.g. “1/4th Human and 3/4 Ape” and so these species declined hence in fear that even they will be declined soon and these mutant will over power them hence these mutants were abandon. Some of these mutant might have also be killed by their ancestors. Or These mutants were future of this planets as their features where advanced then their ancestors hence they survived. The theory of "Survival of the fitest". Even the chances of interbreeding cannot be ruled out among these mutant and still “Half Human and Half Ape” like species. Thus even Cain might have got an “Half Human and Half Ape” like female. But as the genes of Mutant human were more powerful hence the genes of Cain suppressed the qualities of the genes of his “Half Human and Half Ape” like wife and created another mutant like himself. Or Cain might have married another mutant female like himself of some other mutant couple that was the daugher of Bdam and Bve who were born after Adam and Eve hence making Adam and Eve and the First male and female mutant. I have mentioned "99% Human and 1% Ape" like species and not exactly 100% Ape just because I did not knew what exactly they were called as per darwin's theory. I did not mean direct leap from Ape to Human. As per Darwin's theory itself some period of time some generation did co-exist at same time. Genepool agreed it could be that adam was born 1 sec earlier than another human being so does that makes sense that Adam can be the first human. I did not meant that on of a child of Gorilla was born as Human do you understand now. consider from 1th year monkey 1000th year chimpanzee 1000000th year Ape 999999999--------------? what can this be somewhat 99% Human and 1% Ape 1000000000th year first human Adam just after adam was born after few mintues Eve and then other human beings perhaps on the same month or after certain years Now do you understand what I meant do you still feel that there is a direct leap from Ape to Human there can be more thousands of years inbetween from Ape it might haven't turned to somewhat intelligent ape and then more intelligent and then more and then more. The species inbetween Ape and Human might be having different names like ramapthicus something like that and so there were many species as such. Archeological edvidence have found out that at some point of time there exist two different species. It is quiet possible that one was at its end stage and other was the newer one. Species like:- Homo rudolfensis and Homo georgicus Homo ergaster and Homo erectus Homo cepranensis and Homo antecessor Homo rhodesiensis, and the Gawis cranium The "modern man" debate and the Great Leap Forward Until about 50,000–40,000 years ago the use of stone tools seems to have progressed stepwise: each phase (habilis, ergaster, neanderthal) started at a higher level than the previous one, but once that phase had started further development was slow. In other words, one might call these Homo species culturally conservative. After 50,000 BP, what Jared Diamond and other anthropologists characterize as a Great Leap Forward, human culture apparently started to change at much greater speed: "modern" humans started to bury their dead carefully, made clothing out of hides, developed sophisticated hunting techniques (such as pitfall traps, or driving animals to fall off cliffs), and made cave paintings. This speed-up of cultural change seems connected with the arrival of modern humans, homo sapiens sapiens. Additionally, human culture began to become more advanced, in that, different populations of humans begin to create novelty in existing technologies. Artifacts such as fish hooks, buttons and bone needles begin to show signs of variation among different population of humans, something that has not been seen in human cultures prior to 50,000 BP. Whether this was an acceleration from standstill, or a trend that had in fact already started earlier, is debated: many innovations of the past 50,000 years are known to have occasional precursors in the Middle Stone Age. Among innovations of the Acheulian and the Middle Stone Age are the use of fire (500,000 BP), building shelters (400,000 BP), production of stone blades or knives (280,000 BP), grinding stones (280,000 BP), long distance barter trade (140,000 BP), fishing gear (110,000 BP), mining (100,000 BP), and beads (75,000 BP). However, these mostly remain incidents and do not become common until after 50,000 BP. Theoretically, modern human behaviour is taken to include four ingredient capabilities: abstract thinking (concepts free from specific examples), planning (taking steps to achieve a farther goal), innovation (finding new solutions), and symbolic behaviour (such as images, or rituals). Among concrete examples of modern human behaviour, anthropologists include specialization of tools, use of jewelry and images (such as cave drawings), organization of living space, rituals (for example, burials with grave gifts), specialized hunting techniques, exploration of less hospitable geographical areas, and barter trade networks. Debate continues whether there was indeed a "Revolution" leading to modern man ("the big bang of human consciousness"), or a more gradual evolution. Three 1.5m tall Homo heidelbergensis left footprints in powdery volcanic ash solidified in Italy. Homo heidelbergensis is the common ancestor of both Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens. Look at the timeline and review your knowledge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_human_evolution Birth of the mitochondrial Eve in Africa. She is the earliest female ancestor common to all mitochondrial lineages in humans alive today. Birth of Y-chromosomal Adam in Africa (most likely Ethiopia or Sudan). He is the most recent common ancestor from whom all male human Y chromosomes are descended. new Y-Adam. Mitochondrial Eve is the name given by researchers to the woman who is the most recent common matrilineal ancestor for all living human mitochondrial DNA. This is not the same as the most recent common ancestor of all living humans, nor is Eve a unique ancestor for humans living today. We know about Eve because of mitochondria. Mitochondria are organelles that are only passed from mother to offspring. Each mitochondrion contains a single strand of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Based on the molecular clock technique of correlating elapsed time with observed genetic drift, Eve is believed by some to have lived in a population of humans about 150,000 years ago in what is now Ethiopia or Tanzania. It does not means that the actual Eve was born much before Adam but it shows that some of the characteristics that Eve had were present in some quantity in Mitochondrial Eve. But Mitochondrial chromosomes did not developed but male chromosomes did developed and formed Y-chromosomes. Physical structure of Eve were different than the ancient Mitochondrial Eve but their chromosomes were same. Just as mitochondria are inherited matrilineally, Y-chromosomes are inherited patrilineally. Neanderthals die out, leaving Homo sapiens and Homo floresiensis as the only living species of the genus Homo. Homo floresiensis largely or entirely dies out due to a volcanic eruption. Recent single-origin hypothesis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-origin_hypothesis Because you might ask Eve was born much before than Adam. The name Eve, in retrospect, is perhaps the worst possible name to give to the entity in question. I believe that this is probably the cause of so much confusion in understanding what the significance of this entity is. People think that this title has some deep theological or religious consequences. Nothing of that sort. Someone you come across who claims that the bible (or the book of Genesis) has been validated by the discovery of the Mitochondrial Eve, is talking crap---you should feel free, and even obligated, to tell them so. The Mitochondrial Eve of 200,000 years ago (ME for short henceforth) is NOT our common ancestor, or even common genetic ancestor. She is the most-recent common ancestor of all humans alive on Earth today w.r.t. matrilineal descent. That may seem like a mouthful, but without even a single one of those qualifying phrases, any description or discussion of the ME reduces to a lot of nonsense. While each of us necessarily has two parents, we get our mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA from the ovum (and hence from our mothers). Our mothers got their mitochondrial DNA from their mothers and so on. Thus, while our nuclear DNA is a mish-mash of the DNA of our four grandparents, our mitochondrial DNA is an almost exact copy of the DNA of our maternal grandmother (the match may not be exact due to mutations. In fact, the mutations in the mitochondrial DNA provide the molecular clock that allows us to determine how much time has elapsed since the ME lived). The ME represents that woman whose mitochondrial DNA (with mutations) exists in all the humans now living on Earth. That does not mean that she is our lone woman ancestor. We have ancestors who are not via matrilineal descent. For example, our father's mother (who did pass on her mitochondrial DNA to her daughters) is an example of an ancestor who is not matrilineal to us. However, she did exist at one time and was probably of the same age as our mother's mother, who is a matrilineal ancestor of ours and from whom we got our mitochondrial DNA. check this link http://www.geocities.com/krishna_kunchith/misc/eve.html Soul is an Engery<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> All souls have come from a main source and these souls take a form of living beings. The souls keeps on changing form but a individual is a combination of a particular soul and a body. When this soul leaves the body and takes another form then it is not the same individual it becomes another individual hence the new individual does not remembers about the previous past of the soul. The previous past is of that soul and not of that new individual. Soul is like a energy it is neither created nor destroyed it changes forms. In scientific terms they are chemicals which combine together to form a soul the energy. This soul is not capable of thinking anything without a body because the body has the brain. When a soul and a body combines it becomes a individual but when the same soul combines without another body it becomes another individual similarly when a body combines with a soul it becomes a particular individual and when it combines with another soul it becomes altogether different individual. Just like <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place>Battery</st1:place> which has a energy like soul and the metal body of battery like body, when the energy gets over the <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> dies during the life of the battery the energy is converted to different form probably to light the Torch. Similary the soul takes different forms even the body no one has past life until and unless the same soul and the same body combines but body gets decomposed hence it gets mixed up with soil hence same combination of material cannot be easily combined to create the same body hence eventhough a body is anyhow be made it is not likely that the same soul or the part of the soul again run the body because after being converted to other energy form may light or sound it is not possible that they combine together again if they combine then it will be a rare combinations because even the genealogy should combine hence nobody has past life or future life, every one has only one life to attain kevalya the ultimate truth or knowledge. All energies light, sound, chemical and soul ultimately merge to the main source of energy which people called GOD the ultimate source of energy. <o:p> </o:p> All souls have come from a main source and these souls take a form of living beings. The souls keeps on changing form but a individual is a combination of a particular soul and a body. When this soul leaves the body and takes another form then it is not the same individual it becomes another individual hence the new individual does not remembers about the previous past of the soul. The previous past is of that soul and not of that new individual. Soul is like a energy it is neither created nor destroyed it changes forms. In scientific terms they are chemicals which combine together to form a soul the energy. This soul is not capable of thinking anything without a body because the body has the brain. When a soul and a body combines it becomes a individual but when the same soul combines without another body it becomes another individual similarly when a body combines with a soul it becomes a particular individual and when it combines with another soul it becomes altogether different individual. Just like <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> which has a energy like soul and the metal body of battery like body, when the energy gets over the <st1:place>Battery</st1:place> dies during the life of the battery the energy is converted to different form probably to light the Torch. Similary the soul takes different forms even the body no one has past life until and unless the same soul and the same body combines but body gets decomposed hence it gets mixed up with soil hence same combination of material cannot be easily combined to create the same body hence eventhough a body is anyhow be made it is not likely that the same soul or the part of the soul again run the body because after being converted to other energy form may light or sound it is not possible that they combine together again if they combine then it will be a rare combinations because even the genealogy should combine hence nobody has past life or future life, every one has only one life to attain Moksh the ultimate truth or knowledge. The energy used in Tube light might be once a part of living giving energy called soul. A soul alone cannot think, cannot feel or cannot understand. Similarly, a body alone cannot think, cannot feel or cannot understand. But when both soul and body combine to form a individual then that individual can think, that individual can feel and that individual can understand. Once a soul separates from body memories are washed away as the memories that Individual had was the combination of that soul and that body. Hence no past life of an Individual. The soul splits from the body and again in atmosphere it again gets splits and gets merged with different energy or different part of another soul energy resulting into a altogether different entities and so does the body the body particles are converted into fossil and other substances. All energies light, sound, chemical and soul ultimately merge to the main source of energy which people called GOD the ultimate source of energy.

Shri Krishna united all tribes living in this subcontinent. Just like how Sri Krishna had united all people living in this subcontinents. This is because of the great effort of Sri Krishna it is very difficult to find out who is aryan and who are non aryans. Sri Krishna made India a united nation. Though Duryodhan supported one lower caste person like Karna but he was not capable of uplifting all lower caste public only Sri Krishna was able to do so by his diplomatic skills. Also, Sri Krishna was himself a non aryan plus Pandavas were mixed race of Aryan and Non Aryans. During the early Mahabharata there was not caste difference hence even Pandu's and Dhitrashtra's father Vichitravirya was the son of a fisherwoman Satyavati but it developed later stage during the era of Karna and Pandavas. Sri Krishna wanted to unite all tribes and populations living in Indian subcontinent as Indians or Hindus and not aryans and dravidians. Similarly unite all Bhramins and Dalits Just like how Sri Krishna had united all people living in this subcontinents. This is because of the great effort of Sri Krishna it is very difficult to find out who is aryan and who are non aryans. Sri Krishna made India a united nation. Though Duryodhan supported one lower caste person like Karna but he was not capable of uplifting all lower caste public only Sri Krishna was able to do so by his diplomatic skills. Also, Sri Krishna was himself a non aryan plus Pandavas were mixed race of Aryan and Non Aryans. During the early Mahabharata there was not caste difference hence even Pandu's and Dhitrashtra's father Vichitravirya was the son of a fisherwoman Satyavati but it developed later stage during the era of Karna and Pandavas. Sri Krishna wanted to unite all tribes and populations living in Indian subcontinent as Indians or Hindus and not aryans and dravidians. Similarly unite all Bhramins and Dalits. Same way all the Dharmic organization like Arya Samaj, Brahmo Samaj, Vishavnism (ISKCON) and Shaivism should have a conference and then finalize a common structure of our Ancient Dharmic religion otherwise it will continue like what happened since ancient times, instead of joining all humans as single Human family new and new religions were formed. That time it was understanable as people used to leave in a group and used to hardly interact with outsiders hence their religion and practices was restricted to them but now time has changed it is becoming Globalization and hence it is required to come into a common stand and formulate a common structure alteast for Dharmic religion. When we ourselves are not united then how can we unite entire Human family. According to Jews it is said that a day will come when all tribes will unite, which the Jews interpreted that a day will come when only Jew tribes will unite among themselves actually it meant that a day will come when all Human tribes will unite and form a common Code of Conduct, not just Jews. Historical Sri Krishna Some people might think how a charka can move violating the law of gravity, for them it is very simple charka is actually a Boomerang which Indian cowherds use to keep to look after their cattle and sheep and also this Boomerang after completing it’s motion used to return back to the person’s hand who used to spin it. This Boomerang is what Sri Krishna used as Chakra which only Sri Krishna mastered and also he had developed a sharp edged Boomerang.

Sri Hanuman was real historical person. Addition Idea of Ramayana. About Hanuman's and kumbakaran's height (brother of Ravana), It could be possible that they might be 7 foot tall gaint because even today if any one is taller among our friend we call them as gaint hence it would have been possible because they were taller then other people of their times hence they might have be called as gaint. But it was said that Hanuman was able to maximize or minimize his size for this it can be shown that the was was able to walk by crouching or bending his back making his size lesser. It was said that he travelled back to Kashmir to bring Sanjeevani for Laxman it can be shown that he might have used the help of trees somewhat like Tarzan and went through underground tunnel hence managed to reach Kailash faster. Also, he might have brought the peice of rock in which Sanjeevani was rooted as he was a gaint and a body builder hence he was able to carry heavy or large piece rock and not whole mountain which a common man could not carry. There was certain stages wherein ape like human existed among the future human as per Darwin’s theory. The following were the speices that co-existed probably one was becoming extinct and other was the evolving one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution a) Homo rudolfensis and Homo georgicus b) Homo ergaster and Homo erectus c) Homo cepranensis and Homo antecessor d) Homo rhodesiensis, and the Gawis cranium All species Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_human_evolution http://evolution.massey.ac.nz/lecture7/lect700.htm http://www.pinkmonkey.com/studyguides/subjects/biology-edited/chap12/fig12_2.gif http://www.pinkmonkey.com/studyguides/subjects/biology-edited/chap12/b1200001.asp List of famous Apes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_apes Hence you can portray Hanuman as one of such species. Now, it is a known fact that these species did not had tail. But as per the Hanuman depicted in theory has a tail. There can be a possibility that Hanuman was a one of such species but since they were in general called as vanar or monkey because there is no ancient or Sanskrit name for gorillas or chimpanzees in India hence proper Humans might have called these species as monkey. Also there are only two instances where his tail was used once while burning lanka and latter on in Mahabharat. As he lives on tree tops hence he might be used to keeping rope along with him which can help him to climb any three like the commando hence this rope was called as tail. On the contrary there is rumour among rational and scientific Sanskrit people that vanar was the name of the tribe but because the civilization was lost and later when it was found out we misinterpreted them as monkeys rather than Human tribes or Apes. Also, the weapon that Hanuman was to use that is called Gadha in Sanskrit or Hindi is actually called Mace in English. But as they were cave men or stone age men so probably he might be using rock like mace and not as per the theory. You can assume that Mallab the equipment used in Indian Akada wrestling might be his weapon as it is known that he was a bodybuilder of that time. It can also be a Flintstones Stone or Malaabh or Dhand used in phalwan gym traditional Indian akada gym. Also, it was said that first humans lived in caves and on tree tops. As kiskinda was a jungle hence people might be staying in Tree tops and hence they were called as vanar because they were staying on tree tops not because they looked like monkeys. The information about Mace:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mace Now the question arises is about his tail. It could be a possibility that the end of his Dhoti or the cloth that he wore was burnt and with that burnt cloth he burned entire lanka. He clothing might so long that he was able to roll its end on the ground and sit on it to show as if he is ascended in a throne in front of Ravana. Generally people in Southern India use rope to climb coconut trees. Hence those who do this regularly always carry rope along with them hence there can be possibility that it was actually lord Hanuman used to carry and not a tail of lord Hanuman. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coconut Crossing the sea with one jump and reaching lanka probably will be that he jumped and landed on the rockes that where separated to a longer distances and so on he went to lanka or he might have met some sailor who helped him to sail to lanka because it was said that he was interrupted by a demon who later on helped him. Later on they might have made bridge over these sea rocks to make a path to Lanka. There are some sea rocks or small Island still available between India and Lanka and It was called adams bridge. As he might be an athlete this was the reason why he was able to jump on long distance rocks like high jump and long jump. This is not possible for a common man. One of the researcher says the following thing article “More about Adam's Bridge” http://www.madhoo.com/archives/technology/ http://www.madhoo.com/images/adams11.php Hanuman, the monkey God in the Ramanyana (Joseph 2004), must have been Homo erectus and this hominid species would certainly have seemed ape-like to modern day man. They were the ancestors of Pekin man in China (Wolpoff and Caspari 1977), the 1.6 million year old Homo erectus in Java and probably the 18 thousand year old hobbits recently found on Flores island (Stringer, 2004; Dalton, 2004). Adam’s bridge appears to have been constructed between southern India and Sri Lanka 1.8 and 1.6 million years ago in the Treta Yuga during a period of sharp sea level fall to some 60 metres below the present sea level (Figure 2; Eberli 2000). A strip of land must have been exposed between India and Sri Lanka as the sea level approached its lowest level, between 1.8 and 1.6 million years ago. Because Homo erectus had already reached southern India before that time he must have tried to get across to Sri Lanka when the land began to be exposed at low tide during this period of sea level fall, around 1.75 million years ago (Joseph 2004). The driving force for his migration was probably population pressure within the southern Indian forest which caused food shortage. The exposed region between southern India and Sri Lanka must have been a treacherous path with many quicksands and shallow lakes. It seems logical that after several of his company were lost during periods of rising tide, Homo erectus could have started to construct a causeway by throwing trees and other vegetation onto the loose sand and and covering them with rocks. Homo erectus must have built the floating bridge on the quicksands that is so elegantly described in Sage Valkimi’s account of the “Ramanyana “(Joseph 2004). Nala son of Vishvakarma (architect of the demigods) constructed a causeway - magnificent with its wonderful paved floor - like unto a line traced on the waves”(Joseph 2004). The Adam’s Bridge causeway must have been a major engineering feat for its thin trace is still so clearly visible on the present day satellite images (Joseph 2004). It has resisted the relentless erosion of the sea for almost 2 million years and it attests to the great engineering skills of the ancient Indian people. It is the earliest and largest carbon-fibre reinforced civil engineering structure known to man and should be protected as a world heritage site. A shallow seismic survey could be used to detect the strong reflection acoustic signal of lignite formed from decayed wood in the framework of the causeway and this will guide later drilling programs where the actual structure of the causeway could be investigated. For more details http://www.madhoo.com/archives/technology/ Adam’s Bridge Arial Nasa View http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bf/NASA_satellite_photo_of_Rama%27s_Bridge.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/72/AdamsBridge.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Adams_bridge_map.png Even in current day there was a chimpanzee who use to walk straight on two legs always and look some what like Humans he was used in Hollywood movies. Earlier they misinterpreted it to be mix breed of Human and chimpanzee but later on they found out that he was a mutant chimpanzee and not human. Check out his link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_the_chimpanzee Also, Makardwaja was Sri Hanuman’s son this shows that genetical engineering was much more developed at those days. Because Makardwaja was actually Sri Hanuman’s Clone. Also, it is said that Makardwaja’s mother was a fish it could be possible she may be belonging to Fisherman’s daughter or anything like Matsya kula.

Some practices though being for noble cause can be misused by some corrupt and evil people hence such practices should be avoided.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Biksha:- Though this was a good practice when ancient monks used to go house to house for alms but in current world many people having taken up beggar as their birth right. Hence they are always reluctant to any developmental work. Some people can give excuse that even ancient monks used to practice Biksha but that Biksha is different from today’s Bhik(Begging). They used to take food and clothing in the name of Biksha and not money. Today there are many people who had made Begging as a profession where local goons force children to beg for which they even cut their limbs. Hence instead of giving money to beggars people should give them food to eat now these food items are of no use for local goons hence they won’t further abduct and force children for such an act of begging. Some people misunderstand the Biksha(Donation) and Bhik(Begging). <o:p> </o:p> Samadhi:- At one point of time it is was the source to attain salvation but there are many other monks like Gautam Buddha who have proved that salvation can be attained even without Samadhi. In current generation Samadhi can be misused by certain people in the form of suicide. Hence even this practice of Samadhi should be stopped for the betterment of humanity. Just like how some evil people like terrorist misuse holy war to spread terrorism, in the name of Holy war they are spreading and imposing their rules and regulations. Holy war means war against evil system and ritual, no humans should harm another human that too who are not interested in fighting with others. <o:p> </o:p> Sacrifice:- At point of time sacrifice was used to return gratitude to the god for the favor that has been done to human. But now days some cruel people sacrifice children and animals for pleasing God. God has asked Abraham to sacrifice his son just to test Abraham’s loyalty towards him. God did not allowed Abraham to sacrifice his son. God does not asks any one to sacrifice. If at all God needed sacrifice then he can do by himself by sending natural calamity like earthquake and Tsunami there is no need for humans to impose their rules and regulations on other humans to sacrifice their feeling on the behalf of God. Gautam Buddha and Swami Vardhman had proved that without sacrifices also one can attain salvation. <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Nakedness:- <o:p> </o:p> Regarding the nakedness and clothing. Mahavira Swami did had some of his disciples who use to wear clothes. Wearing just a piece of cloth does not means attachment to desire but wearing heaving costly garments, ornaments to show off and when new design garments come then try to buy them means attachment to desire. Even skin is the like a garment to our internal organs then does that means that even we have to shed of our skin and if we don’t shed it off then does that means that we are so deeply attached to our skin that we forget our duties. Even caste system might be made in the ancient times just to get population census for that times ruling kings, so that they can plan their strategies regarding the investment of resources but later on it became an evil practice for societies when people became avoiding people of low caste, by some saint and kings who were at highest position. Similarly some corrupt minded people can misuse the pure concept of nakedness without desire, I am not referring to holy hindu sadhus and jain saints. But you cannot completely disagree that some people can misuse, just like some sadhus misuse their holy status to fulfill their evil desire. But as a whole the main purpose of swami Mahavira becoming a Jain will undermine, his main idea was to unite people and show them the path to leave in Harmony. Spreading equality and peace is also one of the teaching of Swami Mahavira why it is given less patronage then not wearing clothes or wearing clothes is given, if equality was not given less patronage then why there is Digambara and Swetambara. Why they are different? Why there are not united? I apologize to say that due to these difference the main concept of spreading the principles of Swami Mahavira had to some extent reduced. No body wants to make an effort to give importance to the main concept like equality and peace whereas people are giving more importance to nakedness. “Thus Mahavira became homeless. As he was leaving the garden, a Brahmin beggar, who had missed out on the last year of Mahavira's almsgiving, asked him for alms; he gave him half of the garment on his shoulder. After thirteen months he gave up clothes altogether.” After thirteen months he gave up clothes altogether that means till thirteen months he use to wear some or the other clothes probably he might have abandon the clothes generally humans in a town or a city wear and he might have started wearing leaves or hay around him just like the tribal human. Because even if today in any city if we as a urban human wear just leaves or clothes like thing make of hay then people around us might taunt us or question us as “Where are your clothes?” that means that they consider a leaves or clothes like thing made up of hay as a garment. By saying that swami Mahavira broke the old traditions, I meant that he had revolutionized that era when people use to discriminate between high caste and low caste people. He did broke the age old ancient tradition of our society called caste system which had become unhealthy environment of common people. In the same manner after some years some people can misuse such holy concept of nakedness like some sadhus do, I don’t want to elaborate on such things becomes some people without thinking or analyzing anything will feel offended they will feel that it will hurt their religious issues if such issues are discussed, hence I would like to clarify that I am not referring to all sadhus. I am referring to corrupt sadhus like Chandraswami who is being jailed, again I am not referring to any other Chandra swami, I don’t know whether there is any other saint whose name is similar to Chandraswami that I am referring to who is being jailed.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> It ancient times even when a person was just covered by short dhoti to cover his genital he was still considered as Nagna because full covered meant covered from top to both. Hence when Swami Mahavira had given away his richly princely garments people might have said that he had become naked because there is no evidences that he never ever whore a short piece of cloth to cover the lower half of the body because in those days the low class people use to wear just a small dhoti or lungoti type of clothes to cover the genitals hence it could be possible that Swami Mahavira might be wearning a small dhoti like or Lungoti like garment around his lower half of the body. Howerver, the question of him wearning or nor wearning anything is not more important. The important thing is to spread his ideas and message of peace.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In ancient even many Hindu Shadus used to wear lungotis(small cloth) some groups of citizens at that time might be considering those monks who where lungots as naked for e.g. if today a person walks on a street wearing an underwear then people passing by may call out that “Who dekho nanga jar aha hai” however that person is wearing an underwear but he is still considered as Naked hence in the same way Swami Vardhman might be wearing a lungoti or used to cover genitals with bush or leaves somewhat like tribal dress.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In today’s generation because if an corrupt monks like Chandra Swami becomes a Digambar monk then he can misuse the concept of nudity to fulfill his evil desire. So that the self respect of a woman is maintained for not looking at any other naked man then her husband.

Current generation seeks logical explanation rather than magical description to understand a religion. Nowadays there is no Namaskar to Chamatkar: Ancient Indians in ancient times followed the concept of Dharma as per logical reasoning they used to practice which ever religion they wanted by their will but after BCE people started incorporating magic inorder to spread their religious ideas. This was the reason why things like Rakshash, God with four arms and legs and Gods with Animal heads were formed so that people starting praying to them but in reality this does not exists. God is exists but he is formless he can acquire any form but still he is formless. Some of the authors of ancient texts added Metaphor to emphasize their words like for e.g. Suppose If I am a writer and I am writing a Biography of my favorite cricketer Sachin Tendulkar Indian Cricketer. Then I would try to praise him as much as I can, I will write that Sachin Tendukar was a HUGE GAINT in Batting field and so on.. After centuries when our generation get extinct then one day during evacuation people find out my half tored book which just has “Sachin Tendukar was a HUGE GAINT” and the remaining …” in Batting field and so on” is missing then people of that era might assume that Sachin Tendulkar had a very tall body probably 7 feet tall or 6 feet tall however we know that actual height of Sachin Tendulkar is of a average man. http://www.answers.com/topic/metaphor It is just a figure of speech and not magic. Another e.g. If I am a sculpture and I am making a statue of my favorite cricketer Sachin Tendukar then I would make more big as per my way of conveying thing or If I am not a fan of Sachin Tendulkar or if I don’t know who he is then I would make as statue as per the description that I have got about him from some sources and if those source say that his height is 6 feet tall then I will do as per it. Hence in the same way the Statue of Swami Rishabdev was not made and sanctioned by him nor it was not made in his presence. The statue may be a description work of some other people. Also, at that time people use to criticize the revolution work of Swami Rishabdev hence it could have been possible that the naked statue was make to taunt him for preaching against the caste system and treating the low caste people equal. I am just giving logical and rationalizing views. I am not propagating any religion nor I am intended to do, I felt that teachings and ideas of Sri Ram, Sri Krishna, Swami Vardhman and Gautam Buddha can help to maintain peace and harmony amongst people of all religion. But today’s generation is a bit of scientific generation who believe things only if it logical and proves scientific laws. If you relate religion with Historic authentication and with logical and scientific reasoning then Indian Dharma can spread throughout the world. The ancient Indian culture was formed when many different tribes at different times entered into Indian soil at different times they brought their gods along with them and thus ancient Indian Culture when merged accepts all the gods that belongs to each tribes, thus the concept of one god became diversified. Humans were formed from apes slowly and steadily human population increased then there came the great flood most of them got perish and one family survived he called as Nu in Indian and Noah in the western world and later on all tribes originated from his childrens. They kept on searching for new place when their population began to increase. Some went west, some went east, some went north. Again within each tribes when their population increased further they did what their ancestor did searched for new location and while doing to some got mixed up with their ancestors living in other places, some were accepted some weren’t . Now human family began to split among themselves, some liked others ideas and theory some did not accepted. …………………………………………… Later on people like Lord Ram, Swami Rishabdev… then Zorasthura then Swami Mahavira ….. after some years Gautam Buddha …it is also said that Gautam Buddha was infact the 28th Buddha, since swami Mahavira and Gautama Buddha did lived in the same era they might have at one point of time met each other or Gautam Buddha might have met the immediate disciples of Swami Mahavira.………. this revolution was being spreading in and around Indus valley region and Mesopotamia region after many years … Jesus Christ because it some people say that jesus did visit in his younger days to India, generally whenever a person is in a search of finding knowledge he tries to learn for any source that times trade relation between India and Mesopotamia region did existed, some say that even Arab was once called Arvasthan the place which is famous for it’s horses in ancient times even Indus kings use to purchase horses from there………….. then after some time Prophet Mohammed preached people.. it is also said that when people visit Mecca they are supposed to wear white clothes and shave off their hairs somewhat similar to swetambara culture of wearing white clothes but the difference is that swetambara pluck their hairs.. to some extent it could be conclude that teachings of swetambara to directly or indirectly might have influenced the people living in those regions..………… then after many years …. Guru Nanak … Then Sai Baba and so on preached their views and ideas which respected every one and showed people how to live peacefully and in noble ways. Please check this link http://essenes.net/subindexbuddhas.htm "Three contemporaries lived approximately 2600 years ago - Mahavira, Gosala, and Sidhartha. Mahavira is considered the last great Buddha of Jainism. Although the Order does not fully accept all the teachings attributed to this Mahavira, he is considered more in harmony with the true path than either Gosala or Siddhartha. (for more info on this, see Buddhist). Sidhartha claimed to teach the middle way, but in reality Mahavira taught more of a middle way, whilst Gosala taught the extremist liberal view and Sidhartha the lazy way' Lazy way could be meaning Less stringent practices please don’t misunderstand It does not means Buddhism or any other religion is wrong.. "Unfortunately all these teachers deviated from the more ancient holy path of dharma by introducing celibacy, begging, nakedness, hair pulling, endless arguing about abstract terms, etc. It is the position of the Order of Nazorean Essenes that Sidhartha' doctrine of "no soul" is false and misleading." Check the following link http://essenes.net/subindexbuddhas.htm The book opens with a discussion of the "lost years" of Jesus between the ages of 13 and 30, his travels to India and Tibet, and the "hidden years" after the resurrection, quoting sources such as Nicholas Notovich's Tibetan manuscript on the "lost years" and Indian and Moslem texts detailing Jesus' sojourn on earth to an advanced age in Kashmir, India. It discusses the controversial issue as to whether Jesus survived the crucifixion and the general picture one can gain from various sources showing Jesus as an adept in the traditions typified by the Hindus and others. In general it notes the many statements in the New Testament that can be interpreted in mystical meanings beyond that accepted in the orthodox framework, the many ties and similarities of Christianity to ancient mystical religions, and the vast number of "gospels" and writings that were excluded from the Christian canon, destroyed or suppressed, and that are now being discovered. Please check the following link:- The Lost and Hidden Years in the Life of Jesus http://essenes.net/conspireindex.html Why Romans blamed on Jews for the cruxification were'nt even Romans equalling responsible for the cruxification. Why only Jews? Jesus himself claimed that he was the King of Jews and also he never did what the Romans asked him to do but at the same time he also opposed the bad practices that were been practiced among the priestly Jews at that time. But without judging rationally people went and massacred Jews. What is the fault if a child is born in any community which we don't like or some people don't like? Hence I say that all religions are equal every one is human. All saints and prophets have thought the same concept of peace, equality and non-violence.

Inscription of Nebuchadnazzar I (not of bible fame) in Jain temple of Kathiawar in Gujrat The literary evidence seems to be supported by an epigraphic evidence.1 In Kathiawar, a copper plate has been discovered on which there is an inscription. The king Nebuchadnazzar (940 B. C.) who was also the lord of Reva-nagara (in Kathiawar OF Gujrat) and who belonged to Sumer tribe, has come to the lace (Dwarka) of the Yaduraja. He has built a temple and paid homage and made the grant perpetual in favour of Lord Neminatha, the paramount deity of Mt. Raivata. This inscription is of great historical importance. The king named Nebuchadnazzar was living in the 10th century B. C. It indicates that even in the tenth century B.C. there was the worship of the temple of Neminatha the 22nd. Tirthankara of the Jains. It goes to prove the historicity of Neminatha. Thus, there seems to be little doubt about Neminatha as a historical figure but there is some difficulty in fixing his date. He is said to be the contemporary of Krishna the hero of Mahabharata. The scholars differ in their opinions as to the exact date of the Mahabharata which vary from 950 B.C. to 30002 B.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neminatha Nebuchadnazzar (940 B. C.) was Nebuchadnezzar I of Babylon and not Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon mentioned in Bible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadrezzar_I List of all Nebuchadnazzar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadnezzar

Romans Originated from India Some Roman names in ancient India Maha-roman Suvarna-roman Hrasva-roman http://www.00.gs/Vaivasvata_Manvantara_dynasties.htm http://www.00.gs/Arabi_mythology.htm Kapota-roman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sivi_Kingdom King Sivi is mentioned to have a son named Kapota-Roman, who is mentioned to be a great king of the Sauratha clan Romans may be descendant of Romaharsana Suta http://krsnabook.com/ch78.html There is much similarity in the appearance between us and romans. Both of us have black hair and other physical complexion matches as compared to other Europeans. http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/15_roman_civilization.htm Some say that they were semitic tribe of middle east http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom Etruscan Civilization before the settlement of Romans can from Asia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etruscan_civilization

Karn was the only great warrior of Mahabharat. The Hans(Huns- predecessor of white huns Hephthalites) from whom Khan’s might be the descendants of Karna as Mongols were descendants of Hans(Huns). Kha of Khan and Ka of Karna sounds similar. In an incident which took place during the war between Karna and Arjuna, Arjuna's chariot was hit by Karna's arrows and was displaced a few meters backwards from the impact of the arrows. At that time Lord Krishna, who was driving Arjuna's chartiot, praised Karna for his feat. Arjuna, whose arrows had displaced Karna's chariot by several hundred meters, was shocked at Krishna's praise for Karna and questioned him. Krishna said "Arjuna, I myself who own the whole weight of the entire Universe am sitting on your chariot and your chariot is covered by the blessing of Lord Hanuman. Without these two factors, Karna's arrows would have hurled your chariot off the Earth." It is further mentioned that Karna was capable of defeating Jarasandha in single combat whereas Bheema defeated Jarasandha with the help of Krishan. Karna was the first one to expose the weakness of Jarasandha. Finally, Parashurama, before cursing him, had mentioned to Karna that he was his (Parashurama's) complete equal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karna During his stay in Visnhuavatar Parashurama's hermitage, Karna befriended many Rakshasas,Yakshas,Gandharvas & Nagas. That is the reason why the name Karn was familiar to them has Khan. Han was derived from Karn and later on Khan was derived from Han or directly from Karn. Karna had conquered many foreign states till Kazakhstan and most of the central asian countries for Duryodhana. This was the reason why most of them sided with Duryondhana as his allies. After the war these states were again splitted. Later on some of them were again merged by Arjuna. But Karna was the first one the bring them under his strength and will power due to which he was praised as the most skillful warrior much better than the Pandavas in the art of fighting. Karn's war skills might be reason why people of central asia adopted his name and formed Han, Hun and Khan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunas Karna defeated many foreign countries hence could be possible that he had made many alliances over it could be possible that even Mongolians are his descendants either direct or indirect through Huns. Karna’s campaign had subjugated many invincible and mighty foes—the Gandharas, the Madrakas, the Matsyas, the Trigartas, the Tanganas, the Khasas, the Pancalas, the Videhas, the Kulindas, the Kasi-kosalas, the Suhmas, the Angas (the other Anga kings), the Nishadhas, the Pundras, the Kichakas, the Vatsas, the Kalingas, the Taralas, the Asmakas, and the Rishikas. Subjugating all these brave races, Radha’s son, had caused all of them to pay tribute to us for the aggrandisement of Duryodhana. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anga_Kingdom Agreed it was a war between good and bad but it was an unfortunate incident in which Karna had to fight for Kauravas otherwise his talent could have been used for good. But even Bheesma fought for Kauravas hence even he was siding the bad so then why Bheesma is given respectable position of begin a great warrior and Karna is not given his righteous position, this is because he was considered to be of low origin. If people like Karna were judged on the basis of their skills and not on the basis of their caste, then even all Hindus today would have remained united under one roof no low caste and no high caste. People should have been selected on the basis of their skills just like how romans used to do, they used to recuirt people on the basis of their skills and not just caste. If incase we would have given equal respect, oppertunity to even low caste people and intermingle them among us just like how Sri Krishna united all people living in this subcontinent as much as he can, then even Hinduism could have been a powerful religion much mightier than the early roman empire was when it was just founded. But No, we discriminate people on the basis of their caste. Whenever Sri Krishna used to converse with Karna there was mutual understanding and respect for each other because one point of time even Sri Krishna used to be insulted because he hailed from a village. But still Sri Krishna supported Pandavas the reason for that was because Sri Krishna wanted to unite all people living in this subcontinent irrespective of their castes and cultures. This is all because of the efforts of Sri Krishna that today it is not easy to distinguish between pure Aryans and Non Aryans. Sri Krishna wanted Karna to side with Pandavas but at the same time Sri Krishna knew that Karna was bounded by Duryodhana's one good deed and that was to embrace Karna irrespective of his caste difference. Karna knew that duryodhana was wrong but he could not stop him because karna was obliged to Duryodhana. Though Duryodhana had one good deed of embracing a low caste person but he was not capable of uplifting entire low caste population. After winning the war Duryodhana would have indulged himself in richesm wealth and pleasures, he would have never paid attention of uplifting all low caste people but Sri Krishna wanted to uplift low caste people as well as intermingle each and every group of people living in this subcontintent which he could have not be able to done if Duryodhana was the king. Only Pandavas would have assisted Sri Krishna to uplift low caste and intermingle each and every group of people living in this subcontinent. But Duryodhana would not have allowed Pandavas to rule peacefully, he would have always tried to create unnecessary hurdle in the social work hence it was necessary to kill Duryodhana. By Killing Karna from behind Sri Krishna proved to the world that it was impossible for any warrior to defeat Karna, at the same time Sri Krishna freed Karna from Duryodhana's bondage because Karna had owed that until he is alive no one could even hurt Duryodhana, hence Sri Krishna giving respect to Karna's oath had him killed, because if incase Karna did not die and if Duryodhana dies before karna then Karna's oath would have been false, hence to keep the pride of Karna's oath, Sri Krishna asked Arjun to kill Karna. Also, Karna had promised Kunti that if, he dies or Arjun dies, she will always have her five children alive. This might be one of the reason why Karna inspite of King Shalya's suggestion to hit Arjuna on his chest, opted to hit Arjun on his head, because even Karna knew very well that Sri Krishna will defend Arjun hence the arrow directed toward the head of the Arjuna could be diverted. Indirectly Karna might be helping Arjuna to escape his arrows. Hence he might be just pretending to attack Arjuna because as per Karna's oath that he would not allow anyone to hurt Duryodhana until he is alive but this oath did not contains a clause that Karna cannot forgive Duryodhana's enemies hence there could be chances that Karna pretended to Kill Arjuna but he would have strictly never allowed Arjuna or any other warrior to kill Duryodhana hence along with being loyal to his friend Duryodhana he could also defend his brothers, indirectly. Indirectly speaking he sacrificed his life for his friend and for his brother so that there will always be five children of Kunti alive apart from him as it was very well known that he was Dhaanveera so there is no doubt that he can even donate his life for his brother Arjuna. While assuring to Kunti, Karna told that either he or Arjuna will remain, this might be a political statement because Karna who was fighting from Duryodhana's camp cannot directly assure Kunti that he will spare Arjuna hence he might have given her an indication that he will not harm Arjuna because he hinted her that her five childrens will remain alive and at that point of time every one knew that Kunti had only five children, also he rejected her offer to adopt him as her first son because he was obliged to his foster parents to whom he owed the debt of rescuing him and raised him as their own child, also he did not wanted to hurt the dignity of Kunti of bearing a child before marriage hence he asked to remain quiet about his relationship with her like how she was quiet till now. This all indicate that Karna himself accepted death as his future. Karna was like a lotus among those wicked Kauravas. Even at the End Karna's life was not leaving is body due to his good deeds this shows that he was not a bad person. Sri Krishna asked Karna to leave his body just like a Doctor who does mercy killing to relieve his patients pain, because even if Karna survived the war he would have to live like a Handicap as he was severely damaged in the war hence it was no use for a great warrior like Karna to live like a handicap and to remain at the mercy of others even for his daily routine, hence Sri Krishna asked Karna to leave his body and then ascend to heaven. Sri Krishna told Karna that you were the only warrior who fought like a warrior without any major weapons and with all curses on head. Sri Krishna told to Karna that you got what you wanted, Karna wanted glory and he got glory in the war and also because of the grace of Sri Krishna it became a history that no one was ever able to defeat Karna face to face because even Arjuna had to shot arrow at Karna from behind. On the other hand when Karna died he was not a low caste person he was a king of Anga so killing Karna did not meant discrimination against entire low caste community. It might be discrimination against Karna but not on entire low caste community. But still the way Karna fought it proved to the world that irrespective of his caste one can attain highest position by his will and determination. Karna wanted a glorius death and got what he wanted. He was only person on whose death Sri Krishna felt depressed. Sri Krishna always praised Karna for his skills and even felt Karna's pain. Sri Krishna always treated Karna with respect and so even Karna used to respect Sri Krishna. Draupadhi had insulted Karna claiming to be of low caste during her Swyamwar this was the reason why Karna returned back her insults during Draupadhi's vastraharan. Karna just asked a logical question to her " If she can have five husband then why can't she accept Duryodhana as her sixth husband" just to emphasize that she felt disgraced if she would have married a low caste person like him then how does she considers herself to be respected when she has married to five people. Also, Karna did not supported Shakunis idea of defeating Pandavas in gambling, Karna wanted to win from Pandavas by fighting them face to face but due to Duryodhana's pressure he had to accept this gambling match. But according to Sri Krishna a lady whether she is a wife of one person or of five person she should always be looked upon as mother or sister "Parayee stree par nazar dhalna Paap Hai". This was the mistake which Duryodhana had done. But Karna had just returned back verbal racial abuse back to Draupadhi this was justified. Even Duryodhana should have returned back her verbal abuses with verbal abuses then it would have been justified for this even Sri Krishna would have forgiven him, but he tried to rape her and raping is a sin. During the war Karna was not in the favour of killing Abhimanyu in Chakrayu but still Duryodhana forced Karna to be part of the chakrayu but inspite of being part of the chakrayu Karna did not killed Abhimanyu it was Duryodhana, Duryodhana's brothers and their childrens killed Abhimanyu. Sri Krishna was the only one who discouraged the worship of Indra(Zeus of Greek and Jupiter of Romans). Sri Krishna wanted to unify Hindus, Jains and Buddhist(Gautam Buddha is considered as 28th buddha as per buddhism. Adi Buddha is considered as the founder of Buddhism). Karna was a good man defending bad people. There was also a place called Karn in ancient arab. Even it might be one of the place that he had conquered at that time. But Karna's glory does not ends here. Later on Han(Huns) his descendants and even the mongols(Khans) roused to glory keep his warrior genes in them. The weapon of Han(huns) and Khans were bow and arrow and they used to ride on horse back much what Karna used to do. Karna's blood runs in their veins.

Ancient India and ancient arab Some Jains went to south during the time of Famine it is probably at the time of Chandragupta Maurya during 320 BCE to 293 BC his ruling period whereas he was born in 340 BCE. It is possible that some Jains in the north India must have traveled west to Arab. It can be also possible that other ascetics even Hindu sadhus and rishis have traveled to arab during that era because Islam was founded much later around 622 CE. The map of the empire which ruled areas from Northern India to Eypt. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ian_Empire.jpg Arabia was occupied by traders from Indian and all traders were Jains. Also, It was said that Mohammed received his first preaching in Hera cave and it is well know fact that digambara sect of Jains live in Cave hence he might have got his preaching by Jains. Also, in his childhood he used to trade with his Uncle. He had even gone to Syria and in syria buddhism was famous. Hence instead of making him rishi, sant, sadhu or Mahammat acharya his follower made him prophet. Even the christanity have adopted saint isophat whose story is similar to Gautam Buddha and also the teacher of saint Isophat as saint Barlaam. Barlaam looks similar to Vardham. Also, buddhist believe that Mahavir Vardhman had once preached Gautam Buddha hence the christanity had copied Gautam Buddha and Mahavir Vardham into Christanity. Some relate Jesus to Apollonious of Tyana did came to India and he also learnt from Hindu Sadhus, Buddhist and Jains. Even Jews have adopted ancient Indian dharma. They have learnt from Buddhism. Just like how buddha used to not talk anything about God hence even they used that practice of not calling their name of God. Not only Indian but also all religion in the world should give proper respect to Om (the formless god who does not has his idol). Islam was formed from Jainism. Jews and Christanity was formed from Buddhism. Buddhism and Jainism was formed from ancient Indian Dharma. There were actually three vikramaditya in our country. 325 B.C.E. Harsha Vikramaditya 75 B.C.E. Shakari Vikramaditya 50 B.C.E. Vikramaditya (Vikrama Era) This might be the one who ruled Arvasthan. 375 C.E. Chandragupta II (Vikramaditya) of Gupta dynasty 650 C.E. Vikramaditya I Chalukya Dynasty (Vatapi) Even this can be possible because traders were generally from south india because of the sea route for spice trade because the northern part of Arab was ruled by persians. same year Indian knowledge to Mid East Yemen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabia_Felix Yemen was one of the oldest centers of civilization in the Near East. Its relatively fertile land and adequate rainfall in a moister climate helped sustain a stable population, a feature recognized by the ancient Greek geographer Ptolemy, who described Yemen as Eudaimon Arabia (better known in its Latin translation, Arabia Felix) meaning "fortunate Arabia" or Happy Arabia. Between the 12th century BCE and the 6th century CE, it was dominated by six successive civilizations which rivaled each other, or were allied with each other and controlled the lucrative spice trade: Also Aden a province in Yemen was a part of Bombay Presidency. The Bombay Presidency was a former province of British India. At its greatest extent, Bombay Presidency comprised the present-day state of Gujarat, the western two-thirds of Maharashtra state, including the regions of Konkan, Desh, and Kandesh, and northwestern Karnataka state of India; It also included Pakistan's Sind province and the British territory of Aden in Yemen. It consisted partly of districts, which were directly under British rule, and partly of native or princely states, which were ruled by local rulers under the administration of a governor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_Presidency It could be possible that even Oman was some what related to ancient Indian Trade business. Also, if you closely look at Arabian peninsula and if you try to merge the world map you find out that Oman might have been attached to Balochistan or Sind long long time back. It is quite possible that ancient time Jains long before Mahavira something probably inbetween Rishabdev (1st Jain Tirthankara) and Mahavira might have reached there http://www.peeters-leuven.be/boekoverz.asp?nr=6415 http://www.peeters-leuven.be/related...sp?bookID=6415 http://www.omanet.om/english/history/sec_first.asp Harapan and Mohen jo daro type Pre Islamic dynasty in Oman http://www.omanet.om/english/history/third.asp There was also a place called Karn in ancient arab.

Proof of Vedic Culture world wide. http://www.salagram.net/VWH-World.html 'The Royal Chronology of India' timeline right now at: http://www.newdharma.org/India_Chron.zip It's the most complete timeline of Indian history in the world; from 7000 BCE to today - 325 generations of Kings, Rishis & Priests. Visit http://www.DharmicScriptures.org to view all major Sanathana Dharma Scriptures (10,000 scriptures total) By Niraj Mohanka Celtic druids of London were from India Anacalypsis writtren by Godfrey Higgins Among the many unusual theories presented in this book is that both the Celtic Druids and the Jews originated in India - and that the name of the Biblical Abraham is really a variation of the word Brahma, created by shifting the last letter to the beginning: Abrahma. According to Puranic cosmography, the earth is divided into seven concentric island continents (sapta-dvipa vasumati) separated by the seven encircling seas, each double the size of the preceding one. The seven continents of the Puranas are stated as Jambudvipa, Plaksadvipa, Salmalidvipa, Kushadvipa, Krounchadvipa, Shakadvipa, and Pushkaradvipa. These continents are said to be surrounded by seven oceans, consisting respectively of salt-water, sugarcane juice, wine, ghee, curd, milk and water (Agni Purana 108.1-2, Matsya Purana Ch 121-122). The Celtic Druids, published in 1827 and 1829 as three parts, was intended as a precursor to Anacalypsis. The Celtic Druids was "an attempt to show that the druids were the priests of oriental colonies who emigrated from India, were the introducers of the First or Cadmean System of Letters, and the builders of Stonehenge, Carnac, and other Cyclopean works in Asia and Europe." Higgins prefaced the 1829 second edition stating that he was preparing a review of "all the ancient Mythologies of the world, which, however varied, and corrupted in recent times, were originally one, and that one founded on principles sublime, beautiful, and true." This review would become Anacalypsis Anacalypsis was written in 1833 and posthumously published in 1836 as two quarto volumes numbering 1,436 pages with meticulous references to hundreds of books. Anacalypsis was initially printed as a limited edition of 200 copies, partially reprinted in 1878, and completely reprinted in a limited edition of 350 copies in 1927. The full title is Anacalypsis; An Attempt to Draw Aside the Veil of the Saitic Isis; or an Inquiry into the Origin of languages, Nations and Religions. Anacalypsis is a review of the history of religions; however, due to his untimely death Higgins was unable to complete the final chapter on Christianity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anacalypsis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Higgins Sir Godfrey Higgins

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> An Indian Tribe which after development named themselves as Aryan. They did not came to India from outside they were many Indian tribes following different cultures like nagas, kurus etc… These Tribes had come to India much much before there was any name giving to any Tribes. After living in this continent for millions of years some of them named themselves as Aryans who followed certain rules as per newly developed Aryan tradition and the remaining were termed as non Aryans. Dravidian means all those tribes who did not merged with Aryans in those days. In Ancient times India stretched from Greece to Central Asia and China. These group of Indian tribes who named themselves as Aryans were actually residing in and around Iran which was the part of Ancient Indian Empire. Hence Ancient India was called Mahabharata(Greater Bharata/India). Hence even the Kurushetra war was called Mahabharata because all existing world tribes from greeks to chinese participated in the War. Indirectly you can say that entire earth was Mahabharata(Greater India). Even Greeks and mongols were Indians. Ancient people actually originated from Asia Minor went and settled in Rome and became Romans. Pheonicians were Indian Traders. Philistine were also small time Indian Traders. Jews were actually originated from Ancient Mahabharata(Greater India) not Mahabharata war. Turks and Greeks were from ancient MahaBharata(Greater India). <o:p></o:p> Just like how there are different political parties are formed, different religious groups and different organization are formed among us in the same way Aryan was just like a organization. Different people in a country join parties are formed, different religious groups and different organization in the same way Different groups of people joined Aryan organization in those days. Just like how all different political parties, different religious groups and different organization belonged to the same country in the same way all Aryans and Non Aryans belonged to the same country called MahaBharat(Greater India). Aryan does not means white race or black race both black and white people were present in Aryan organization.

All those continents in which there was civilization in ancient times were the part of Mahabharat not just Greek to china and Mongolia. There was a continent called Lemuria between India, Arab and Ethiopia which was submerged due to which different tribes like Elamites belonging to MahaBharat(Greater India) shifted some went to Elam in Mespotanium and some moved to Ethiopia and some went to South India. People living in Tamil Nadu itself are not pure Non-Aryans some of them are Elamite(Shemitic tribe) some of them were from Northen Madra kingdom which was in Bactria and later even Parthian(Phalavas) descendant into Tamil Nadu. Hence as per Greek reference south Indians were called eastern Ethiopia, this suggest that Africa and India were linked by a continent called Lemuria which was also a part of Mahabharat(Greater India). Andhra tribe also shifted from ancient Hindu Afghanistan. Hence all belonged to MahaBharat(Greater India) they just got shifted and nothing else. Arabians are actually Hindu traders who settled there for trade purpose and some Arabians were also the Dacoits(Pirates) who settled from Chambal to Arab to loot the Caravan which used to transfer goods for foreign trades. We Indians knew the trade routes from eastern side to American Continent but it was not a Trade center. There was one continent called Atlantis inbetween America and Europe through which Indians used to contact European and western African countries. But when Atlantis got submerged Europeans lost the link of America as ancient Europeans did not conducted sea voyage they were just aware of Atlantis but they did not knew about America but when Atlantis submerged they felt that there is no more continent on their western side, hence there was no link between Europeans and American continents until it was re-discovered by Columbus in search of India, that means Europeans were aware that Indians used to even arrive from their western side, this might be reason why they tried to explore new route from their western side. After when Atlantis was submerged ancient Indian traders did not used the sea route from America to Europe because it would have a big longer route as compared to land route the one from Arabia and Egypt because in these Land routes there were many civilization that were able to purchase Indian products and hence more profits by selling Indian products to different civilizations on the way than the route from America, as of only tribal people migrated to America and they did not started a civilization in that era hence no one in American continent had that much money to pay for Indian products. Civilization in America started in later times. The third lost continent was between America and Eastern Asia + Australia, some say that this continent was called MU but some argue that Lemuria itself is called MU. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/atlantida_mu/esp_lemuria_2.htm http://www.lankalibrary.com/geo/lemuria.htm http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_libros_3a.htm http://www.crystalinks.com/lemuria.html http://www.sacred-texts.com/atl/tll/tll01.htm http://www.call-of-the-sea.com/potpourri/atlantis_slemen.htm http://www.originpress.com/atlantis/ http://www.call-of-the-sea.com/potpourri/images/atlantis_pashos.jpg http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_atlantida.htm Greater India (Mahabharat/Akanda Bharata) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undivided_India Greater India is another term sometimes used to describe the region between Central Asia in the North and tropical Indonesia in the South, and from the borderlands of Persia to Tibet and western China, which has had a significant Indian influence on its culture and civilizaton, including religious thought, language, art and literature.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" /><o:p>Hindu Kush</o:p> <o:p>We Indians are not infidel. Infidel means non followers of god but we follow God hence some people are misguiding entire world. Indian are true people of Book called Veda and India is the Holy Land. Hindu Kush is the name given to the Kushan kingdom of Indus and not the place where Hindus were killed. Hindus(Indo) are stronger than everyone. There was one Kush kingdom in African hence to differentiate this Kush kingdom in Africa and Kush kingdom in Asia, the Asian Kush Kingdom was called Hindu Kush. </o:p>

Here is the list of Indian Ascetics with whom Alexander communicated. Dandamis might be a Hindu Sadhu(Shraman) or Jain Acharya. Who refused to go with Alexander to Greece. Kalanos whose pyre is at Susa. He also might be Hindu Sadhu(Shraman) or Jain Acharya. Who accepted to go to Greece with Alexander but unfortunately he fell ill due to which he had to end his life in Susa. He predicted that he will embrace Alexander even after his death this was a indication that even Alexander will die before he reaches Greece. Sakaymuni. He might be Buddhist monk. Later on Alexander's army managed to take Sakaymuni to Greece.