Hi,
The reference to the temporal aspect is troublesome. If there is not beginning and no end, then the temporal dimension of the "being" is zero. Sadly to be made up out of the particles that describe existance, time is a necessity by Einstein's Time Space Duality Theorum. As a result we would not say that Krishna' or any being, exists that is outside the temporal dimension; i.e., is not made up out of particles known in our universe. Thies leaves us only with believing rather than knowing.
Now for my question: Why are people that are involved in sprititual concepts or religions adverse to the idea of knowing as apposed to believing? Why not simply test the "existance" and know the answer rather than having to believe something. Why religate "God" to an untestable hypothesis that is only important enough to be believed in rather than known?
Pete
