Hello again.
This is the "guest",
"I can see you mean business here. It doesn't look like 'just', 'random', 'silly', 'I thought', 'say something'. You clearly mean to support vaishnavas far from nuetral."
I actually did randomly come upon this forum, I have only used a forum once before. I do surrender to god as best I can, as I said in my first post.
"i think he is the resident 'guest'
who might have gotten bored, and so posted this."
I can understand you thinking this, that 'guest' is who prompted me to post in the first place. I'm sure the 'squabbles' are not common place, and I didn't mean to sound judgmental I choose the wrong choice of word. You misundertand me.
"Stop such pretence as above and surrender to god. stop judging other things as squabbles. And teach fellow vaishnavites better means of pleasing their customized and demi-godish version of krishna, than by merely arguing all the time that krishna is the only supreme. "
I'm sorry but I don't know where you got all of that. I never said Krishna is the only supreme avatar of Vishnu.
Thanks again to the first poster for being more welcoming. Sorry to you others I did not mean to offend in anyway. I was trying to say with my post that all ideas are needed and should not be attacked, but looked at equally to gain a better understanding.
Bogert,
-Hare Krishna-
