the mokshya can only achieved either by bhagwan or sant(sat purus, akantik etc).
by many references in vachanamrut. even it can not be achieved by acharya whosoever?( it is nowhere written that the mokshya even can be archieved by acharya)
in present time the swaminarayan bhagwan is not physically present so we need to search the sant rather acharya or whatsoever
the four things are essential dharma bhakti vairagya and atma nistha find the sant who archived the items and do what he says
this whole arguing sessions do not bring any mokshya to anyone, the knowledge can not achieved by just referring scriptures by youself there are many secrete meaning are there to understand in order to reveal those meaning u need true sant.
the discussion of yours shown that you are figting in order to nurture your ego noting else no true guru and even a true acharya said so far as
you all like bookworm or scripture worm. ultimate realisation can not be archieved by just reading scriptures buy so much by following the path shown.
it can not be assumed that the god's son must be god, not true. bhagwan swaminarayan ni gadi to guno ni gadi chhe. na to acharya and his parampara ni gadi.
dharma vagar ni bhakti nakkami chhe a pachi sadu hoy ke acharya.
when u dont know yourself very well u dont have right to judge either acharya or pramukh swami they might be doing as per bhagwan swaminarayan,s wish and u r not god that u know everything
the date before acharya not selected do u think that the was not there even the swami narayan is there. you are wrong.
it is gujarati proverb "kuva ma hoy to havada ma ave" if achaya is following as per dhamamrut and shikhsapati said its ok but if not they are not considered to be even satsangi. refere the definition of satsanti and kusangi. i am not criticising anybody but merely saying that if u really want akshardham then find the sant as described by swaminarayan because in all scriptures only two are praised one bhagwan and sant not even achaya.
here u will raise objection that what about every words said by shriji maharaj about achaya? i say if one fail in his duty than he is not considered to be undertaking his duty? so i have already mentioned aa gadi to guno ni gadi chhe not father's propety that herited generation by generation even though there are acting out of law.
stop discussing and think about yourself how far you have reached in order to achieve the state of bhraman rather than locking yourself in boundry. not good. rather than thinking about the what is truth and not youself lets pray god because he is all doer that guide me through this.
this is my personal view that looking to the guns described by the bhagwan swaminarayan the sant described by the vedas and swaminarayan scriptures the sant is pramukhswami no one else not in whole earth but in bramand if one really want to challange than show me anyone else on the planet. if anybody is not respecting him can not be forginven by even bhagwan swaminarayan. and ante to narak ma jase.
jay swaminarayan
