Moksha and Ketu in 12th from Karakamsa

om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Narasimha Ji,

Thanks for the coments on my analysis on Swamiji.Of course I have used the

normal methods of birth time rectification and you may have your own methods

also.

Also as you wrote, I observed the Ak's Shashtyamsha deity which is Deva but I

did not elaborated on that.

With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana,

Ramadas Rao."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:

Namaste friends,

 

I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and

some people sent some example charts of people they know.

 

I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point.

Perhaps I can write more during the weekend.

 

Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give

moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or

aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give

moksha.

 

In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces

and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and

exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is

a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one

malefic aspect Ketu.

 

In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in

response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more

malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn)

aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai

Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo,

may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with

Ketu, after all.

 

It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw

Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart!

 

The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that

AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th

from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show

a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in

Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi

had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami

Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god).

 

Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent

good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and

not malefics.

 

I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list.

May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha

 

PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's

chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may

write my reasoning later.

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Win an evening with the Indian cricket captain:

India Promos.

Om Gurave Namah

 

Namaste Narasimha,

 

Sri Satya Sai Baba did indicate that there is one more incarnation

(final)of his that is yet to grace the earth. Hence the Saturn+Ketu

combination in 12th house from karakamsa. Perhaps the last

incarnation would have only Ketu in the 12th.

 

How would you interpret the chart of Sri Raghavendra Swamy of

Mantralayam, whose longevity was variously predicted as 70yrs, 300yrs

and 700 yrs? Would Ketu be in the 12th from Karakamsa?

 

Regards,

Lakshmi

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste friends,

>

> I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or

last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they

know.

>

> I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write

one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend.

>

> Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not

necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll

give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or

aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha.

>

> In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus

is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is

aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla

Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus,

two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic

aspect Ketu.

>

> In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv), who posted her data

here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic

(Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a

malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled

out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who

has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get

moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with

Ketu, after all.

>

> It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited

when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart!

>

> The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own

belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster

sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa

(breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of

moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras

are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon

in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami

Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god).

>

> Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and

represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or

aspected b y benefics and not malefics.

>

> I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy

Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the

exact rectification and may write my reasoning later.

Narsimha Ji,

The following birth data has Ketu in 12th house. Please analyse for Moksha:

 

DOB: November, 11, 1958POB: Mombasa, Kenya

Longitude: 39 deg 40 Min East

Lattitude: 4 deg 3 min South

TOB: 5:15 PM or 17:15, 2hrs 45 mins east of GMT (this time difference was for

the year 1958 for Kenya)

 

Thanks,Devika."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:

Namaste friends,

 

I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and

some people sent some example charts of people they know.

 

I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point.

Perhaps I can write more during the weekend.

 

Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give

moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or

aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give

moksha.

 

In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces

and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and

exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is

a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one

malefic aspect Ketu.

 

In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in

response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more

malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn)

aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai

Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo,

may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with

Ketu, after all.

 

It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw

Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart!

 

The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that

AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th

from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show

a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in

Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi

had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami

Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god).

 

Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent

good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and

not malefics.

 

I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list.

May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha

 

PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's

chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may

write my reasoning later.

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

Photos:

om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢

Narsimha Ji,

The following birth data has Ketu in 12th house. Please analyse for Moksha:

 

DOB: November, 11, 1958POB: Mombasa, Kenya

Longitude: 39 deg 40 Min East

Lattitude: 4 deg 3 min South

TOB: 5:15 PM or 17:15, 2hrs 45 mins east of GMT (this time difference was for

the year 1958 for Kenya)

 

Thanks,Devika."Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:

Namaste friends,

 

I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or last week?) and

some people sent some example charts of people they know.

 

I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write one point.

Perhaps I can write more during the weekend.

 

Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not necessarily give

moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll give moksha if he is with or

aspected by benefics. If he is with or aspected by malefics, he will not give

moksha.

 

In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus is in Pisces

and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is aspected by Moon, Mercury and

exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is

a benefic too. Thus, two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one

malefic aspect Ketu.

 

In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv ), who posted her data here in

response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic (Sun) and two more

malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a malefic when he is with Saturn)

aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai

Baba of Puttaparthy, who has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo,

may not get moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with

Ketu, after all.

 

It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited when I saw

Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart!

 

The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own belief that

AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster sister has Ketu in 12th

from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa (breaking a lineage) and does not show

a soul that is on the verge of moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in

Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi

had AK Moon in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami

Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god).

 

Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and represent

good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or aspected b y benefics and

not malefics.

 

I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list.

May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha

 

PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's

chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the exact rectification and may

write my reasoning later.

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

Photos:

om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢

Namaste Narasimha,

 

I was watching a youtube video (

) on Ista deva. The author mentioned that If Ketu is in union with the grahaha for Ista Deva or in 12th house it means Moksha according to Parashara Sloka (refer the video).

 

In my case it is in Union. Can you please confirm if this is true. My Natal chart

 

9-12-1969

12:30pm

Avadi, TN, INDIA

13 8 36 N, 80 4 59 E

 

Please watch the video first, as he was specific about this. He got my Ista deva correct. But I though Ketu has to be in the 12th house. But he was confident that Parashara sloka mentions union also.

 

Thank you so much in advance.

 

KK

 

 

 

Om Gurave Namah

 

Namaste Narasimha,

 

Sri Satya Sai Baba did indicate that there is one more incarnation

(final)of his that is yet to grace the earth. Hence the Saturn+Ketu

combination in 12th house from karakamsa. Perhaps the last

incarnation would have only Ketu in the 12th.

 

How would you interpret the chart of Sri Raghavendra Swamy of

Mantralayam, whose longevity was variously predicted as 70yrs, 300yrs

and 700 yrs? Would Ketu be in the 12th from Karakamsa?

 

Regards,

Lakshmi

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste friends,

>

> I talked about Ketu in 12th from karakamsa earlier this week (or

last week?) and some people sent some example charts of people they

know.

>

> I have been busy and have a little bit of time now and will write

one point. Perhaps I can write more during the weekend.

>

> Ketu in 12th from karakamsa (i.e. AK in navamsa) does not

necessarily give moksha. According to Parasara, such a Ketu wioll

give moksha if he is with or aspected by benefics. If he is with or

aspected by malefics, he will not give moksha.

>

> In the case of Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda's navamsa, AK Venus

is in Pisces and Ketu is in Aquarius. Ketu is alone and he is

aspected by Moon, Mercury and exalted Sun. Waxing Moon of Sukla

Ekadasi tithi is a benefic. Lonely Mercury is a benefic too. Thus,

two benefics aspect Ketu. Thus, two benefics and only one malefic

aspect Ketu.

>

> In the chart of "minusDott" (deeptinv), who posted her data

here in response to my mail, for example, Ketu is with one malefic

(Sun) and two more malefics (Saturn and Mercury - Mercury is a

malefic when he is with Saturn) aspect him. Thus, moksha is ruled

out. Even a great godman like Sri Satya Sai Baba of Puttaparthy, who

has Saturn and Ketu in 12th from AK Jupiter in Virgo, may not get

moksha according to Parasara's explicit criterion. Saturn is with

Ketu, after all.

>

> It is in this bigger context that I was so impressed and excited

when I saw Swami Ganapathy Sachchidananda's navamsa chart!

>

> The above is strictly following Parasara. In addition, it is my own

belief that AK has to be in a good shashtyamsa. Senthil's foster

sister has Ketu in 12th from karakamsa, but AK is in Kulaghnamsa

(breaking a lineage) and does not show a soul that is on the verge of

moksha. Sri Satya Sai Baba's AK Jupiter is in Kinnaramsa (Kinnaras

are advanced godly beings like Yakshas). Ramana Maharshi had AK Moon

in Amritamsa (amrita is the divine nectar of immortality). Swami

Ganapathi Sachchidananda had AK Venus in Devamsa (Deva means god).

>

> Thus, I believe thereare two criteria: (1) AK should be strong and

represent good accumulated karma and (2) Ketu should be with or

aspected b y benefics and not malefics.

>

> I hope this makes some sense to the learned scholars of this list.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> PS: Sri Ramadas Rao wrote a nice analysis of Sami Ganapathy

Sachchidananda's chart. I have some disagreement with respect to the

exact rectification and may write my reasoning later.