Guest guest Posted August 31, 2006 Report Share Posted August 31, 2006 http://www.rense.com/general45/cant.htm The Man-Made Origin of AIDS: Are Human and Viral Experiments Responsible For Unleashing The HIV Holocaust?? By Alan Cantwell, Jr, MD c. 2003 11-21-3 AIDS in America rarely makes headlines anymore. In the mind of the public the disease is still believed to be a sexually-transmitted disease mostly affecting male homosexuals, drug addicts, prostitutes and promiscuous people. Starting officially in June 1981 as a " gay disease " affecting only a few dozen men, there are now 800,000 reported U.S. AIDS cases and 460,000 deaths, mostly young men. The prediction of a " major threat " to the " general " heterosexual population never happened. Every December 1, we commemorate World AIDS Day. This year (2003) there are 36 million people worldwide estimated to be living with AIDS/HIV. Twenty-two million people have died of the disease. This year, AIDS will get more attention than usual. On November 16, 2003, CBS was supposed to have to aired " The Reagans " - an unflattering portrait of President Ronald Reagan who presided over the first years of the AIDS epidemic. The miniseries was cancelled due to a flood of protests, particularly over a line in the script where Reagan says, " They that live in sin shall die in sin. " There is no historical evidence that the president ever uttered such a line; and Reagan admirers fumed over the attempt by CBS to " rewrite history. " However, it is a fact that the political infighting between the various federal health agencies, and the shameful refusal of the Reagan administration to fund AIDS research and education, all combined to provide a serious indictment against the government's handling of AIDS in the early years of the American epidemic. Most disconcerting is the fact that Reagan never once uttered the word " AIDS " in public until March 1987, when 16,000 Americans (mostly gay men) had already died of AIDS. More furor over the failure of the Reagan administration to act against the epidemic will undoubtedly escalate when Tony Kushner's famous AIDS-themed play " Angels in America " airs on HBO on December 7. All of this current rehash into the early years of AIDS will lead to a further historical reexamination of the government's role in handling the mysterious outbreak that first began as a gay disease and now is an unstoppable worldwide pandemic. But the media and the AIDS scientists have never told the real history of AIDS and its origin to the world public. We are repeatedly told that HIV came from Africa. But how is that sexually and biologically possible? How could a supposedly black African heterosexual disease- that some scientists claim has been around for decades or centuries in Africa- suddenly transform itself into an exclusively white male homosexual disease in America, and at a time when AIDS was unknown in Africa? Is AIDS, in reality, a man-made disease originally produced by human experimentation or human error? Could the bio-engineering of dangerous viruses that preceded the " gay plague " be responsible for the origin of AIDS? In view of covert and unethical government-sponsored human radiation experiments that preceded AIDS, is it fair to blame gays, blacks and chimpanzees for a disease that could have been started by vaccine programs utilizing gays and blacks as guinea-pigs? These are historical issues that will never be considered by the media in the wake of the AIDS controversies surrounding " The Reagans " and " Angels in America. " However, there is strong evidence to suggest that HIV/AIDS is indeed a man-made disease, and it is time to " rewrite history " to include long-forgotten and suppressed facts about AIDS and its origin. By Alan Cantwell, Jr Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been persistent rumors that the disease was man-made, and that HIV was deliberately " introduced " into the American gay and the African black populations as a germ warfare experiment. This so-called conspiracy theory was quickly squelched by virologists and molecular biolologists, who blamed primates in the African bush and human sexuality for the introduction and spread of HIV. In the fall of 1986 the Soviets shocked the world by claiming that HIV was secretly developed at Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army's biological warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as " infectious propaganda " , Russian scientists had worked hand in hand with biological warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses and virus-infected tissue into various non-human primates (monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s before AIDS appeared. With improved international relationships, the Russian accusation vanished. Although evidence supporting the man-made theory has never been mentioned in the major U.S. media, the theory continues to be ridiculed. For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle,( " Quest for the Origin of AIDS " , January 14, 2001), William Carlsen writes: " In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories attempting to explain the origin of the disease ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a secret CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals and drug addicts; it came from outer space, riding on the tail of a comet. " AIDS certainly did not come from the hand of God or outer space. However, there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s in New York City. Creating AIDS in animals before the epidemic Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV as a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer retrovirus experimentation in the " pre-AIDS " years of the 1960s and 70s. Evidence linking the introduction of HIV into gays and blacks via vaccine experiments and programs in the late 1970s has been totally ignored in favor of the politically correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees in the African rain forest, and that HIV " jumped species " into the African population around 1930 or even earlier. Conveniently overlooked is the series of outbreaks of AIDS-like epidemics that broke out in U.S. primate centers, beginning in 1969. A decade before AIDS, the first of five recorded epidemics of " simian AIDS " erupted in a colony of stump-tailed macaques housed in a primate lab at Davis, California. Most of the macaques died. Two types of primate immunodeficiency viruses were eventually discovered as the cause. A few silently infected monkeys transferred to the primate colony at Yerkes in Atlanta subsequently died of simian AIDS in the late 1980s. Veterinarians claim the origin of the simian AIDS outbreak is unknown. However, one obvious possibility is the experimental transfer of viruses between various primate species, which is common practice in animal laboratories. In 1974 veterinarians actually created an AIDS-like disease when newborn chimps were removed from their mothers and weaned exclusively on virus-infected milk from cows infected with " bovine C-type virus. " Within a year the chimps died of leukemia and pneumocystis pneumonia (the " gay pneumonia " of AIDS). Both diseases had never been observed in chimps before this virus-transfer experiment. Also downplayed is the laboratory creation of feline leukemia and " cat AIDS " by the transfer of HIV-like cat retroviruses in the mid-1970s. These experiments were conducted at Harvard by Myron (Max) Essex, later to become a famous AIDS researcher. All this man-made creation of AIDS in laboratory animals directly preceded the " mysterious " 1979 introduction of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in America. Nowadays, scientists hunt for " ancestor " viruses of HIV in chimps in the African wild and ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS. No consideration is given to any of these lab viruses as possible man-made ancestors of the many " strains " of HIV (and HIV-2) that jumped species to produce AIDS in humans. The gay experiments that preceded AIDS (1978-1981) Scientists also discount any connection between the official outbreak of AIDS in 1981 and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine program (1978-1981) at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan that used gays as guinea pigs shortly before the epidemic. Curiously, the exact origin of AIDS in the United States remains unstudied. Health authorities simply blame promiscuous gay men, but never adequately explain how a black heterosexual African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white young gay male disease in Manhattan. Researchers claim HIV incubated in Africa for more that a half century until AIDS broke out there in 1982. However, in the U.S. there was no incubation period for gay men. As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin. The hepatitis B experiments began in Manhattan in the fall of 1978; the first few cases of AIDS (all young gays from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979. Scientists have also failed to explain how a brand new herpes virus was also introduced exclusively into gays, along with HIV, in the late 1970s. This herpes virus is now believed to be the cause of Kaposi's sarcoma, the so-called " gay cancer " of AIDS. Before AIDS, Kaposi's sarcoma was never seen in healthy young men. Identified a decade after HIV, in 1994, this KS virus is closely related to a primate cancer-causing herpes virus extensively studied and transferred in animal laboratories in the decade before AIDS. Also downplayed to the public is a new microbe (Mycoplasma penetrans), also of unknown origin, that was introduced into homosexuals, along with HIV and the new herpes virus. Thus, not one but three new infectious agents were inexplicably transferred into the gay population at the start of the epidemic (HIV, the herpes KS virus, and M.penetrans). In his book, Virus [2000], Luc Montagnier (the French virologist who co-discovered HIV) blames promiscuous American gay tourists for bringing this new mycoplasma to Africa, and for bringing back HIV. He provides no evidence for this homophobic theory. Nor does he mention the various mycoplasmas that were passed around in the 1970s in scientific labs, and the fact that these microbes were frequent contaminants in virus cultures and vaccines. Why are all these simultaneous introductions of new infectious agents into gay men ignored by scientists? Surely a credible explanation would be important in determining the origin of HIV and AIDS. Why are scientists so opposed to the man-made theory? And why do they believe so passionately in the chimp theory? One explanation might be that scientists don't want the public to know what happened to the tens of thousands of imported primates who were held captive in laboratories throughout the world in the decade before AIDS. The forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1977) Rarely mentioned by AIDS scientists and media reporters is the fact that surgeons have been transplanting chimpanzee parts (and chimp viruses) into people for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964 he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants. Much more likely to have spread primate (chimp and monkey) viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the production, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal cancer and immunosuppressive AIDS-like viruses and retroviruses. These laboratory created viruses were capable of inducing disease when transferred between animal species and also when transplanted into human cells and tissue. The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-funded program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed to study leukemia, the program was soon enlarged to study all forms of cancer. The scope of the program was international and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and Africa. The mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers from around the world and to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses. As a result, thousands of liters of dangerous man-made viruses were adapted to human cells and shipped around the world to various laboratories. The annual reports of the SVCP contain proof that species jumping of animal viruses was a common occurrence in labs a decade before AIDS. The SVCP gathered together the nation's top virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and epidemiologists, to determine the role of viruses and retroviruses in the production of human cancer. Many of the most prestigious medical institutions were involved in this program. Connected with the SVCP were the most famous future American AIDS scientists, such as Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Max Essex of " cat AIDS " fame, and Peter Duesberg, who claims HIV does not cause AIDS. Gallo and Essex were also the first to promote the widely accepted African green monkey theory of AIDS. This theory was proven erroneous as far back as 1988, but was heavily circulated among AIDS educators and the media until the theory was superceded by the chimp theory in the late 1990s. Biowarfare research, primate research and the SVCP Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the military's biological warfare researchers. On October 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be converted to cancer research. As part of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled the new Frederick Cancer Research Center, and Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor for this project. According to the 1971 SVPC annual report, the primary task of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Center was " the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis. " Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and " the successful propagation of significant amounts of human candidate viruses. " Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses that might cause human cancers. For these experiments a steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary; and multiple breeding colonies were established for the SVCP. Primates were shipped in from West Africa and Asia for experimentation; and virus-infected animals were shipped out to various labs worldwide. By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to other primate centers. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild). By the early 1970s, experimenters had transferred cancer-causing viruses into several species of monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to the new Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus that produced the " gay cancer " of AIDS in 1979. In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed. The U.S. is the world's leading consumer of primates, and 55,000 are used yearly in medical research. Primates (especially newborn and baby chimpanzees) are the most favored lab animals because they are similar biochemically and immunologically to human beings. Humans share 98.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Chimps were extensively used by SVCP because there would be no official testing of " candidate " lab viruses on humans. In the decade before AIDS, Gallo was a project officer of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkey viruses, into newborn macaques (a small species of monkey that carries a close relative of the KS virus). Recorded in the 1971 SVCP report (NIH-71-2025), Gallo's project notes state: " Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations, and subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates to man justifies utilization of these animals for these purposes. " Researchers at Bionetics injected human and animal cancer material into various species of monkeys to determine the cancer effect. Newborn and irradiated monkeys were injected with blood ( " using multiple sites and volumes as large as possible " ) taken from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated into primates. How many " new " and " emerging " viruses were created and adapted to human tissue and to various primates is not known. Some primates were released back into the wild carrying lab viruses with them. The possible spread of these lab viruses to other animals in the wild has been ignored by scientists searching for the origin of HIV and its close relatives in African animals. Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. Germ free colonies of inbred mice were established. Mouse cancer viruses were manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains. These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement experiments. Such experiments utilized a weakened strain of the mouse leukemia virus to infect and " taxi-in " the missing genes to genetically-defective human beings. The end of the SVCP and the birth of AIDS By 1977 the SVCP came to an inglorious end. According to Gallo, " Scientifically, the problem was that no one could supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus, and most researchers refused to concede that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce dramatic, visible results. " Despite all this, the SVCP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome project. More than any other program it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses in humans. As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs in government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. These same cities would soon become the three primary epicenters for the new " gay-related immune deficiency syndrome, " later known as AIDS. Two years after the termination of the SCVP, the introduction of HIV into gay men (along with a herpes virus and a mycoplasma) miraculously revived retroviral research and made Gallo the most famous scientist in the world. Could virus-contaminated hepatitis vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees. To this day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS. Was HIV (and the KS herpes virus and a new mycoplasma) introduced into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals were injected in Manhattan beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities in 1980-1981? As mentioned, the first gay AIDS cases erupted in Manhattan a few months after the gay experiment began at the NY Blood Center. When a blood test for HIV became available in the mid-1980s, the Center's stored gay blood specimens were reexamined. Most astonishing is the statistically significant fact that 20% of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a year before the AIDS epidemic became " official " in 1981). This signifies that Manhattan gays in 1980 had the highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. And epidemic cases in Africa did not appear until 1982. Although denied by the AIDS establishment, a few researchers are convinced that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through which HIV was introduced into the gay population. My own extensive research into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic [1988], and in Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993]. These books also debunk the preposterous " Patient Zero " story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought AIDS to America. The highly implausible story was sensationalized in the media and served to further obscure the origin of AIDS in America and blame gay promiscuity. Even Montagnier is doubtful that the U.S. epidemic could have developed from a single patient. Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp theory is the fact that the New York Blood Center established a chimp virus laboratory in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. A few years later this vaccine was inoculated into gays at the Center. Chimps were captured from various parts of West Africa and brought to VILAB. Alfred Prince, Head of virology at the NY Blood Center, has been the director of Vilab for the past 25 years. The lab prides itself by releasing " rehabilitated " chimps back into the wild. Also closely allied with " pre-AIDS " development of a hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicized primate colony outside New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and primate parts for transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the New York University Medical Center, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in 1979. Researchers at NYU Medical Center were also heavily involved in the development of the experimental hepatitis B vaccine used in gays; and the Medical Center received government grants and contracts connected with biological warfare research beginning in 1969, according to Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola [1996]. Scientific disinformation and the 1959 HIV-positive blood test from Africa By predating HIV back to the 1930s, the chimp theory effectively discredits the man-made theory of AIDS, which dates the introduction of HIV to the late 1970s. Only time will tell whether the chimp theory will hold up to further scientific scrutiny. Conspiracy theorists believe some widely published AIDS origin stories in the media are merely examples of scientific disinformation designed to cover-up the man-made origin of HIV. One example is the famous Patient Zero story. Another is the media blitz surrounding the English sailor who supposedly contracted AIDS in 1959. This now-disproven story made worldwide headlines in 1990 and obviously served to contradict the underground conspiracy theory (particularly among African-Americans) that AIDS was man-made. The New York Times (July 24, 1990) declared: " The case also refutes the widely publicized charges made by Soviet officials several years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from a laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological warfare agent. The human retrovirus group to which the AIDS virus belongs was unknown at the time. Nor did scientists then have the genetic engineering techniques needed to create a virus. " Several years later, the case was discovered to be not a case of AIDS because the sailor's tissue remains were accidentally (or deliberately) contaminated with HIV. In 1998 the media alerted the public to further evidence that AIDS started in Africa. The proof consisted of an old 1959 stored frozen blood specimen discovered to be HIV-positive. Researchers claimed the tiny amount of serum contained fragments of HIV " closely related " to a virus found in 3 chimpanzees in the African wild and in the frozen remains of a chimp named Marilyn, discovered in a freezer at Fort Detrick. The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the " world's oldest HIV-positive blood sample " ) are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the ancestor virus of HIV. When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing and included in a report, " Population Genetic Studies, " published in 1966. Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic tests. In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982. Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab. Three specimens initially tested HIV-positive, but finally only the 1959 specimen from the unidentified Bantu man was confirmed HIV- positive. Around the time of these examinations, Essex's lab was unknowingly contaminated with primate viruses. In 1986, Essex discovered a new " human " AIDS virus that later proved to be a contaminating monkey virus. The source of the primate virus traced back to a captive monkey at a primate center in nearby Southborough, Massachusetts. This primate contamination at his lab resulted in the erroneous green monkey theory, heavily popularized by Gallo and the media. Also unpublicized is the little known fact that Gallo's lab at the National Cancer Institute was plagued with contamination by primate viruses. In 1975 he reported a new human " HL-23 " virus that eventually proved to be three contaminating ape primate viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his research. In 1996 Hooper convinced Nahmias to turn over the remaining 1959 specimen to David Ho of Rockefeller University in Manhattan for PCR testing. In 1996 Ho was named Time magazine's " Man of the Year " , at a time when few people had ever heard of him. Ho is also the director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, affiliated with Rockefeller University since 1996. The Diamond Center is also now connected with the New York Blood Center, home of the gay vaccine experiments that gave birth to AIDS. Ho determined the tiny amount of the remaining specimen did not contain live virus, nor was the complete virion of the virus present. Instead, some fragments of the virus (about 15% of the total genome) were tested and presented to the scientific world as the oldest specimen of HIV in the world. Ho's PCR results cannot be confirmed by independent investigators because the 1959 specimen is now totally used up. When published in the journal Nature on February 5, 1998 ( " An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin of the epidemic " ), Hooper's name appeared on the report, along with Ho, Bette Korber, Nahmias, and others, The report was heavily publicized as proof that HIV existed in the African population in 1959. Although there are no HIV-positive tissue specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS either, Hooper relies heavily on this 1959 test to support his theory that HIV entered the African population via the polio vaccines programs in the late 1950s. In The River Hooper quickly dismisses the claims of physician Robert Strecker, the first whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as the research in Horowitz's Emerging Viruses, and in my own books, AIDS & The Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood. In condemning AIDS biowarfare research, Hooper declares, " Sadly, supporters of the Streckers have continued to peddle their ill-informed and outdated versions of the myth, blaming variously the Soviets, the CIA, the Germans, and the World Health Organization (WHO) well into the nineties. " He dismisses the hepatitis B vaccine connection to AIDS by noting that only two of the 826 gay vaccinees had developed AIDS by 1983. Hooper ignores the fact that by 1981 over 20% of the men in the trials were HIV-positive and that by 1982, over 30% of the men were HIV-positive. He dismisses the World Health Organization's African smallpox vaccine connection by saying, " there is no reason for either HIV or SIV [simian immunodeficiency virus] to be accidentally present in the vaccine. " Hooper fails to consider the possibility that the vaccines could have been deliberately contaminated with HIV. Hooper has been a United Nations official, but no details of this are included in his book . Despite his massive research, Hooper seems naïve about the continuing transfer of viruses between various primate species at primate centers. For example, in 1995 he interviewed Preston Marx at LEMSIP. At that time Marx was a representative of David Ho's organization, the Aaron Diamond Research Center. Hooper writes: " I was shocked by the cavalier way in which tissues and sera from one species had been introduced into other species, long after the risks of cross-species transfer had been highlighted by the SV40 [polio vaccine] debacle, and I was astonished that survivors from troops that had been stricken by mystery illnesses could have been casually sold to other centers, for use in experiments there. Furthermore, this apparent lack of monitoring and central control seemed to be echoed in other fields, like xenotransplantation (the transplanting of organ or cells from one species to another) - and here, of course, the implications were even more frightening. " By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignored all those animal viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s, and all those dangerous viral creations that were genetically altered for cancer research, vaccine research, and secret biological warfare. The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, longtime physician-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported " the riddle of the origin of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved. " A team of researchers, headed by Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three chimps in the African wild and had also studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered by accident in a freezer at Fort Detrick. The chimp had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of all this research, Hahn declared that a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the animal source of the virus " most closely " related to HIV. In a media blitz U.S. government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral " family tree " of primate viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was genetically descended from a chimp virus in the African bush. Molecular analysis of virus genetic data, performed by Bette Korber and the supercomputer Nirvana at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, indicated that HIV had jumped species from a chimp to a human in Africa around the year 1930. (Los Alamos is the official home of nuclear bomb-building, alleged Chinese spies, and the laboratory which directed secret human radiation experiments on unsuspecting civilians from the 1940s up to the beginning of the AIDS epidemic.) Beatrice Hahn theorized that the epidemic started when a hunter cut himself while butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected. Scientists readily accepted Hahn's notion that the AIDS virus and its closest relatives jumped species from chimps to humans on multiple occasions, thereby explaining the origin of the three separate subtypes of HIV-1 (M, N, and O), as well as HIV-2. Chimps in West Africa are hunted for food, as well as for medical experimentation. Young chimps are especially prized for scientific research and are usually caught by shooting their mothers. Many die from stress and inhumane conditions during capture and transport to laboratories and zoos in Western nations. Due to all this killing, chimps are now an endangered species. During the past century the African chimp population has dropped from two million to less than 150,000. Despite the mass killing of chimps, they are still blamed for causing the worldwide epidemic of AIDS. Beatrice Hahn is no stranger to primate theories, having worked in Gallo's lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980s and the " close relationship " of the monkey virus to HIV. Now Hahn's virus was claimed to be a closer relative than the contaminating monkey virus in Essex' lab that formed the basis of the false green monkey theory. Media journalists paid no attention to these discrepancies. Hahn's new chimp findings, along with the old 1959 blood specimen, fully convinced the AIDS establishment, and an adoring media, that Africa was indeed the source of HIV and the AIDS epidemic. The 2000 London Origin of AIDS Conference When Hooper's book appeared in the fall of 1998, molecular scientists quickly used the new chimp virus data to completely discredit Hooper's polio vaccine theory. AIDS in Africa could not be caused by a virus jumping species in the 50s if it had already jumped species back in the 1930s. Researchers refused to believe scientists could have played any role in the origin of HIV and AIDS. Hooper bypassed the biowarfare theory by predating HIV back to the 50s. Now scientists bypassed Hooper by dating HIV back several decades earlier. The fact that there was no African epidemic until the early 1980s did not seem pertinent. To make their view official, a small group of scientists proposed an " invitation only " meeting to settle the origin matter once and for all. In October 2000 the Royal Society of London held a two-day conference on the origins of HIV. Obviously, the biowarfare theory of AIDS was not discussed. On the contrary, one professor emphatically declared " all human infectious diseases have an animal origin. " Although there never was a disease like AIDS (until scientists started to flagrantly pass viruses around to repeatedly break the species barrier ), the same professor declared that " natural transfer of these infections is a common event in animal populations. " Using the viral fragments from the 1959 specimen and comparing them with the select viruses contained in the data bank at Los Alamos , Betty Korber refined her computer calculations to establish a likely date of 1940, " with confidence levels extending from 1871 to 1955. " The Rega Institute in Antwerp estimated the transfer could have occurred between 1590 and 1760, with 1675 the most likely date. Hooper spoke but his views were largely ignored by the molecular biologists. Preston Marx warned about more human diseases caused by viruses emerging from primates, None of the speakers mentioned what happened to the thousands of liters of animal viruses that were passed around the world by the Special Virus Cancer Program in the decade before AIDS. Instead, the London conferees alerted the public to a new view of medical science, championed by the virologists. The " Last Word " at the conference was that " all human viral infections were initially zoonotic (animal) in origin. Animals will always provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human populations in the future. " And the scientists predicted: " There is still a myriad of current unknown viruses in animal populations on land, sea, and air with the potential to cause human disease. " Apparently, none of these viruses were in animal laboratories. AIDS, cancer, genetic science and covert human medical experimentation Although rejected completely by most scientists, the man-made theory of AIDS is a rational explanation for the origin of HIV. This theory is partly based on an awareness of the gene-polluting activities and species jumping virus experiments of irresponsible scientists during the two decades before the epidemic. In addition, the record clearly shows that scientists and biowarfare scientists experiment secretly on unsuspecting people. Horrific aspects of the Cold War Human Radiation Experiments attest to the fact that covert medical experimentation is not an " X-Files " fantasy or a totally paranoid belief. It is easy to understand why researchers might want to obscure the man-made origin for AIDS and blame primates. It is now apparent that most of the major researchers promoting the African primate origin of AIDS were connected with the largely secret Special Virus Cancer Program, or are scientists involved in the transfer of viruses in animal research, particularly primate research. From the very beginning of the epidemic, researchers disclaimed any connection between AIDS and cancer, as well as any connection between HIV and animal retrovirus cancer research. In 1984, Gallo originally named HIV a cancer-causing " leukemia/lymphoma " virus. To obscure the cancer connection, the name was immediately changed to " lymphotropic " virus. My own Kaposi's sarcoma research, first published in medical journals in 1981, showed " cancer-associated bacteria " as possible infectious agents in " classic " KS tumors. Before HIV was discovered in 1984, additional papers in 1982 and 1983 showed similar cancer bacteria in the enlarged lymph nodes and KS tumors of gay men with " gay cancer " and AIDS. Since the 1950s, cancer-associated bacteria have been linked to viruses, as well as to mycoplasmas. This aspect of cancer research has been suppressed for decades by the cancer establishment. A history of this research and its relevancy to AIDS is the subject of my books, AIDS: The Mystery and the Solution [1984] and The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS and Other Immune Diseases [1990]. Gallo, in his 1991 book, falsely claims that no infectious agent had ever been found in KS. The refusal of AIDS scientists to recognize cancer microbe research, published in peer reviewed scientific journals, is a further indication that the AIDS establishment seeks to control all aspects of HIV research in such a way as to never connect the origin of AIDS with previous cancer research and covert biological warfare research. This cover-up conceals the possibility that AIDS, in reality, is a new man-made form of infectious and contagious cancer. Could a small coterie of government scientists concoct a bogus (but scientifically plausible) primate theory of AIDS origin and bamboozle the public to believe it in order to cover-up the truth? In the 1930s the highly respected German scientific community was entirely transformed by fascist beliefs proclaiming the genetic inferiority of the Jews and the genetic superiority of the German Master Race. This Nazi takeover of science and the media eventually led to the murder of millions in the Holocaust. Could the genetic science surrounding the origin of AIDS obscure a genocidal and world depopulation program of man-made origin? It is time for the man-made theory of HIV to be examined fairly. Proponents of this theory should not be dismissed as paranoid conspiracy theorists; and AIDS educators should educate themselves about this hidden history of AIDS and its implications for the origin of HIV. How many more species jumping viruses will we have to endure before we question the integrity and the agenda of scientists who still blissfully jump viruses between species in animal laboratories? Lawrence K. Altman, the Times reporter who in 1999 wrote that the origin of the AIDS virus was solved, recently asked " Where did AIDS come from? " Now seemingly undecided, Altman answers, " We can only guess. Determining the answer would be important because discovering how AIDS came to be an epidemic might prevent a similar catastrophe in the future. " ( " The AIDS questions that linger, " January 30, 2001). It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how researchers could have created HIV and how they could have transferred the virus to gays and blacks in a covert medical experimentation for genocidal or population control purposes. The secrecy and scientific disinformation surrounding the Human Radiation Experiments of the Cold War era has taught us how easily government scientists can fool the public on scientific matters. And when it comes to scientific monkey business, researchers know that most people are chumps. [Dr. Cantwell is a retired dermatologist and AIDS and cancer researcher, who has written extensively on the man-made origin of AIDS. E-mail address: alanrcan Dr, Cantwell's books are available toll-free in the USA from Book Clearing House @ 1-800-431-1579, and on the internet at Amazon.com REFERENCES: Cantwell AR Jr: Bacteriologic investigation and histologic observations of variably acid-fact bacteria in three cases of Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth 45: 79-89, 1981. Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of pleomorphic, variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case of Kaposi's sarcoma. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology 7: 923-930, 1981. Cantwell AR Jr: Variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in a case of reactive lymph node hyperplasia occurring in a young male homosexual. Growth 46: 331-336, 1982. Cantwell AR Jr: Kaposi's sarcoma and variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in two homosexual men. Cutis 32: 58-74, 1983. Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth 47: 129-134, 1983. Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS:The Mystery & the Solution. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1984. Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS & The Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1988. Cantwell Jr, A: The Cancer Microbe. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1990. Cantwell Jr, A: Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1993. Cantwell AR Jr: " Gay cancer, emerging viruses, and AIDS. " New Dawn (Melbourne), Sept 1998. Faden RR (Chair): The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Gallo R: Virus Hunting: AIDS, Cancer and the Human Retrovirus. New York: Basic Books, 1991. Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1999 Horowitz LG: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Rockport, MA: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1996. Lee RE: AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time-Bomb? Biographical Publishing Company, Prospect, CT, 2000. Montagnier L: Virus. New York: WW Norton Co, Inc, 2000. Special Virus Cancer Program (Progress Report #8). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, August 1971. http://www.rense.com/general45/cant.htmAlan Cantwell <alancantwell wrote: Alan Cantwell <alancantwell Re: All 11- and 12-year-old girls would get MANDATORY shots against cervical cancer.? Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:59:12 -0700 Bob Dunbar <robertaldermandunbar Remember it was Merck (long history of biowarfare connections between George Merck, the founder -- headed b/w research under Roosevelt in WW2) -- Merck made the experimental hepatitis B vaccine injected into gays THAT IMMEDIATELY PRECEEDED THE OUTBREAK OF 'GAY PLAGUE' = AIDS IN NYC Gay men. Results 1 - 10 of about 2,130,000 English pages for HEPATITIS B VACCINE + AIDS. (0.09 seconds) Hepatitis B vaccine experiment Hepatitis B vaccine experiment & AIDS Hepatitis vaccination. " There is no question that HIV was introduced into the US male homosexual population via the ... www.whale.to/v/hepb1.html - 5k - Cached - Similar pages On Jul 4, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Bob Dunbar wrote: > ( " mandated " to those unfortunate enough to still be in public school > system) > > What sort of testing was done do you suppose? Could vaccine have > that AIDS characteristic==that is being ethno-specific? Who were test > subjects? NOW we're getting to the real nitty-gritty of population > control with government forced chemicals on ALL potential mothers. > Has Merck management developed a 'Chutzpah' pill for use by > their head criminals; I'd have thought on the heels of VIOXX murders, > they'd have elected to go for a little lower profile. $360 per > jabbing. Could any government subsidy be in the cards? These guys are > RELENTLESS--- Wonder if Rumsfeld or Krongard or any FDA officials are > heavily invested in their stock? Is a bear Catholic? Are you mad > yet? UncBob Alan Cantwell M.D. alancantwell http://www.ariesrisingpress.com FOUR WOMEN AGAINST CANCER: Bacteria, Cancer and the Origin of Life Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2006 Report Share Posted September 1, 2006 The Origin of AIDS Either all, or nearly all, of the AIDS virus, on this planet, can be traced back to the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine. If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year, that graph does not regress back gradually to one case. It regresses back to thousands of infections, starting at the time of the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine, in Africa. It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan to reduce the world's population. It's all about population reduction. --- ------------------ " The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day. " - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991 " It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. " - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1994. --- ------------------ The origin of The AIDS virus, also appears to be a United Nations supervised facility, at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Biowarfare is ALWAYS supervised by the United Nations; by way of a treaty (United Nations Convention). There are two such labs in the world: Fort Detrick, Maryland and Sverdlosk, Russia. Both are staffed by the same people, and both are supervised by the United Nations. AIDS was not originally transferred to man via a monkey in Africa That was the original theory, which has been discredited. The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of the " AIDS like " virus in the green monkey is not similar to The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of " AIDS " virus in humans. The DNA CODON SEQUENCE " AIDS " virus in humans is 50% similar to sheep Visna, and 50% similar to Bovine Leukemia. This indicates that the most probable origin of AIDS was a recombinant synthesis between to sheep Visna and Bovine Leukemia. This part could have been done by accident. It would only involve mixing sheep Visna infected plasma with Bovine Leukemia infected plasma. Of course this is ALSO an interspecies cross up. HERE IS THE PROBLEM; Recombinant synthesis usually produces nothing else except " incompetents " (Virus that cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed). Recombinant synthesis occurs by accident, on a regular basis, but does not present a significant danger, due to the fact that the " incompetents " cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed. The next step could not have been an accident. The next step would have had to be REPLICATE PASSAGE. REPLICATE PASSAGE involves gradually changing the medium of an " incompetent " ; which cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed. In this way the virus in adapted to live in a new species. Thus an incompetent virus that originated from interspecies cross up involving sheep and cows, can be made to be capable of living in Humans. http://www.konformist.com/1999/aids/manmade.txt <!--StartFragment--> William Campbell Douglas, M.D., National Health Federation's 1985 Doctor of the Year, published AIDS:The End of Civilization, 1989, detailing the development of HIV by scientists working at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland. John Seale, M.D. concludes AIDS was man-made in " Origins of the AIDS Viruses, HIV-1 and HIV-2: Fact or Fiction? " (The British Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 81:617-619, 1988) . Lieutenant Colonel Thomas E. Bearden (U.S. Army, retired) published AIDS Biological Warfare in 1988 which maintains that HIV was developed in American biowarfare labs. Bearden holds a Master of Science degree in nuclear engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics, and heads an aerospace firm in Georgia. Dr. Leonard Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, a Harvard graduate, published Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Genocide in 1996. OutpostS Book Review calls it: " The most massive, well-documented assembly of evidence ever published in support of the idea that the AIDS virus could have been manufactured as a biological weapon... If you scoff at the notion, you won't be so cocky once you see how much evidence exists. " Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe (retired) wrote a letter in 1990 supporting published articles by award-winning journalist, Peter MacKenzie: " I have heard and seen reports of the possible artificial origin of the AIDS virus, but until this report have not seen such compelling evidence of its truth. Mr. MacKenzie has assembled a remarkable documentation of heretofore unpublished data, and an immediate governmental investigation at the highest level should be commenced. " Samuel Evans, Chairman of the National Council of Public Auditors, sent the following letter to every member of Congress in 1989: " I address this letter to you requesting a Congressional investigation into the 'allegations' that our government is financing research and development through genetic heredity engineering to multiply certain viruses to kill specific racial groups...The multitude of allegations, statements, news articles and personal testimony demands prompt clarification. For instance, it is alleged: 1. That Col. David L. Huxsoll, commander of the U.S. Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., has received $60 million for research in biological ethnic weapons. 2. That it might be possible to wage ethnic warfare by developing substances that affect one race more than another. According to Newsweek magazine, Jan. 16, 1989, an example would include 'Valley fever, which is much more likely to kill blacks than whites.' Another substance, developed at a southern California university, is believed to kill only people with melanin in their skin. 3. That it is a coincidence that Fort Detrick, which is where Col. Huxsoll's biological research is being conducted, is also the site of AIDS research.... These allegations go to the very root of our constitutional form of government and basic world human rights, and must be responded to by elected governmental officials on all levels. Nothing less than a Congressional hearing and investigation that may lead to a full world conference in the United Nations is needed to clarify and defuse the alleged mentally deranged plan of world depopulation by ethnic weapons. " (Published in the Executive Intelligence Review, 3/17/89) The Report of the President's Chemical Warfare Commission admits, " The rapid advances of genetic technology -- in which the US for now is fortunately the leader -- offer the predictable likelihood of new agents being developed for which no vaccines or counteragents are known or available. " (Govt. Printing Office, 1985) Erwin Chargaff, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University and recipient of the National Medal of Science for his work with DNA, warned of such research: " I should say that the spreading of experimental cancer may be confidently expected. " (New York Times Magazine, 8/22/76) The Foundation for Economic Trends, in a 1987 lawsuit, forced the Department of Defense to divulge its operation of 127 chemical and biological warfare research sites in the U.S., including universities and corporations, as reported by Science Magazine (2/27/87). http://www.oakvillegreen.com/food_safety.htm Aids and Green Monkeys In his earth-shaking book, " AIDS: The End of Civilization " , Dr. William Campbell Douglass asked, " Do you really think some green monkey all of a sudden bit some guy in the ass and presto, AIDS all over the world? " Dr. Douglass was examining the hype that the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta have been peddling to the public about the AIDS virus, HIV. Douglas's book tells the " whole " story of the development of HIV at the Ft. Detrick (Maryland) military installation. His story is well documented and confirms the theme of the futuristic movie " Outbreak " . The Strecker memorandum - aids is man made --- ------------------------------ VISIT www.getusout.org --- ------------------------------ http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_ journal_of_degenerative_diseases.htm AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases AIDS is a US government operation directed towards population control, which springs from secret research into disease causing agents conducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view of Donald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal of Degenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available for download here by Progressive Convergence, http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America- Jourv5n3.pdf the 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent medical history more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott has delved deeply into the paper trail left by what seems to be a government funded effort to develop disabling diseases and to find ways to transmit these to a target population, time coincident with the appearance of " AIDS " on the world scene. We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about " Viral infections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiency states " , about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy into spontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratory disease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefeller sponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish for wasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a polio vaccine and " lost his records " . Belgian and Portuguese research that completed what US scientists were finding and a small pox eradication campaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent to get to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo is of course a king pin, linking the Nixon " war on cancer " research program with the eventual appearance of AIDS. I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few of the highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and it appears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story in all its gory detail. That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by Boyd Graves, who has been researching the matter independently. His timeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he says became AIDS is available here, http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/ while his flow chart http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/download.html and other publications can be had for a fee. - - - What really causes Aids? Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a government program, that is, whether the program was successful and is now in full swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the result of an accidentally " escaped " bioweaponized swine fever virus is immaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still have some doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about the mechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying that yes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a virus, but what about the abundant data that shows - HIV was never properly isolated - HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of 'infected' victims to explain the damage done - there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV - AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing the patient rather than the virus - those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthen their own immune system by proper nutrition and other natural intervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress to those 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS. All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV may have nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS and that most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is so ardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure at all, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. Peter Barry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he said: http://members.aol.com/pbchowka/live8hiv-aids070105.html " Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue in history, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals and conservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step march toward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigm worldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this sounds like an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objective of policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on the planet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive with antiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if their mothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy and guaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power and authority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including the belief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategy that is now completely operant at every level of public policy around the world. " Genocide or accident? Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceutical genocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? We just can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far. So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky history of what seems to have been a government program with destructive intent. One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any truth to the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit. Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier HIV, or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by which that viral agent or that particular combination causes the destruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know what went on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decade and a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS. But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die from no treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We should concentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation of the patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and other nutrients as advocated by Harold Foster, http://www.hdfoster.com/ a silver colloid patented in the US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, a multivitamin, http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/07/01/harvard_research_in_t anzania_confirms_multivitamin_slows_aids_progression.htm or simply bettering the standard of living and the diet of people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter. Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's not poison the patient in the meantime, please. But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent the next hyped up epidemic. http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/03/02/bird_flu_sars_biowarf are_or_a_pandemic_of_propaganda.htm Here again the link to the special issue: http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America- Jourv5n3.pdf AIDS Made in America - Journal of Degenerative Diseases The recent release by Progressive Convergence: http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/press-AIDS-made-in-America.htm Progressive Convergence release - Whistleblowing: AIDS, Made in America and Harold Foster's book suggesting a nutritional protocol for AIDS patients: What really causes AIDS - Harold Foster http://www.hdfoster.com/index.html#Publications As I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation, here a discussion of it from a recent email: Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan Campbell I came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When I first started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrified with the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then spread to San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first AIDS patients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera, suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay men traveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had no idea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYC for a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer that claimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured in Haiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war against Cuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This was substantiated by an article several years later, citing that the US had sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wild pig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There were other articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekas that they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS, clusters of AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants had smuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire among pigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time in Africa. There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's new retrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent among men who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent in green monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy about the use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangered species. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facing extinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it turned out, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virus research. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as the culture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding green monkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried out on wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of them probably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what would happen, since Haiti was considered expendable. The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual, Haitian people became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that is). I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting this historical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of the green monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patients and declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not mean virulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC, led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak, lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986, faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop an alternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold Spring Harbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyone working on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternative researchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug, was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of its efficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was the first-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the " cause " of AIDS. If what I have stated above is true, what we have is the possibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological warfare. The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg - those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believe that AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim - and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is caused by toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing countries it is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of mundane causes - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, known diseases of poverty. ------------------ The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980 The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic 'Two new viral epidemics erupting exclusively in homosexuals is an unprecedented event in medical science. Such a bizarre and unlikely scenario strongly suggests to me that that the two epidemics of HIV and KS are more likely to have occurred due to the deliberate or accidental " introduction " of new viruses into gay men " -and not from two viruses suddenly appearing " out of Africa. " ' The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980 The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic By Alan Cantwell, MD © 2005 9-27-5 The epidemic of HIV/AIDS and the epidemic of " gay cancer " Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is widely known as the " gay cancer " that often accompanied AIDS when the first cases broke out in gay men in Manhattan in 1979. In 1994 a new " human herpes-8 " virus was discovered that is now widely accepted as the cause of all forms of KS. However, it is extremely important to note that the new KS herpes virus (KSHV) is separate and distinct from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the virus that causes AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). Therefore, it is now important to recognize that two new viruses were " introduced " into gays that produced not only the epidemic of HIV/AIDS, but also the new epidemic of KS ( " gay cancer " ). Two new viral epidemics erupting exclusively in homosexuals is an unprecedented event in medical science. Such a bizarre and unlikely scenario strongly suggests to me that that the two epidemics of HIV and KS are more likely to have occurred due to the deliberate or accidental " introduction " of new viruses into gay men " -and not from two viruses suddenly appearing " out of Africa. " The widely-held theory is that HIV originated in African primates in the African bush. Somehow the monkey or chimpanzee virus " jumped species " into black Africans to initiate the epidemic which has now killed 20 million people and infected 40 million more. How this sexually-transmitted virus came from black Africa to initially infect only young white gay men in Manhattan has never been explained satisfactorily. Furthermore, the epidemic in America erupted in the late 1970s, at a time when AIDS in Africa was unknown. The AIDS epidemic in Africa appeared in the autumn of 1982, at the earliest. The man-made origin of HIV/AIDS The man-made theory of AIDS is generally dismissed as " conspiracy theory. " Nevertheless, AIDS researchers and writers like myself, Dr. Leonard G Horowitz, Dr. Robert Strecker, Professor Robert Lee, and others have proposed for two decades that HIV was seeded into gay men when they volunteered for the experimental hepatitis B vaccine experiment which took place in Manhattan, beginning in November 1978. Additional similar hepatitis B experiments using gay men as guinea pigs continued in other American cities until 1981 -the year the AIDS epidemic became official. Some of the cities included Los Angeles and San Francisco which, along with New York City, became the three big epicenters of the epidemic. My two books on the man-made origin of this disease: AIDS and the Doctors of Death [1988] , and Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993], provide documented evidence to support this theory. A Google internet search using the key words -man-made origin of AIDS- has 246,000 citations to various websites that explore this issue in detail. Despite all this, the man-made theory remains totally ignored by the scientific establishment and the major media. The origin of the new Kaposi's Sarcoma virus Like HIV, the new KS herpes virus-8 discovered in 1994 is considered to be yet another primate virus out of Africa with a suspected primate " viral ancestor " hiding in the African jungle. We are expected to believe that two primate viruses (a retrovirus and a herpes virus) jumped species in Africa at the same time -and ended up exclusively in the blood of white gay American men to produce a new immunodeficiency disease in 1979, now called AIDS. This proposed scenario suggests to me that such an unlikely African event has the markings of a scientific fairy tale, and I remain stupefied that such nonsense can pass for " science " in the twenty-first century. The origin of Kaposi's Sarcoma KS has a long history dating back to 1872 in Vienna, Austria, when dermatologist Moriz Kaposi described five patients with red-purple skin tumors. Before the AIDS outbreak, KS was a very rare disease affecting mainly elderly Jewish and Italian men. It was never considered a contagious or sexually-transmitted disease. In the 1960s, it was discovered that KS was a common skin cancer tumor in blacks in Central Africa, but the disease was never associated with the severe immunodeficiency characteristic of AIDS, nor was there any evidence that KS in Africa was sexually transmissible. KS was rarely, if ever, seen in African-Americans. As a dermatologist for over 30 years I never saw a KS case in a female; and KS in young men of any race or sexual persuasion was as rare as hen's teeth before the " introduction " of HIV. KS is a medical enigma. How did a previously rare disease like KS in America become a transmissible disease primarily affecting gay men? How did this herpes KS virus escape detection during the first 15 years of the AIDS epidemic? Why did the KS virus and HIV suddenly appear together in young gay men in 1979? Further complicating this picture is the discovery of small bacterial forms known as " mycoplasma " , and the even more recent discovery of extremely tiny virus-like forms of bacteria called " nanobacteria " , as well as my published reports of " cancer bacteria " as important etiologic agents in AIDS and KS. (For details, Google: " alan cantwell " + cancer bacteria.) All these newer bacterial agents are generally ignored by AIDS researchers, who focus exclusively on viruses. I believe some of the answers to questions surrounding the origin of HIV/AIDS can be found in the annual " Progress Reports " reports of the Virus Cancer Program and the Program's relationship to animal cancer research, genetic engineering of viruses, cancer vaccine research, and to covert biological warfare research. These hard-to- find annual Reports were published by the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland. The Virus Cancer Program (1968-1980) The Virus Cancer Program had it roots in 1964 when Congress provided funds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for intensive research into the possible role of viruses in leukemia. In 1968 the Program, then titled the Special Virus-Cancer Program, was enlarged to encompass all types of cancer. On July 1, 1973 the Special Virus Cancer Program was renamed The Virus-Cancer Program (VCP) " to integrate the Program's research activities into the framework of the new National Cancer Plan. " The Program combined the talents of many of the nation's finest virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, epidemiologists, and physicians, in an attempt to uncover the viral cause of cancer. Two classes of cancer-causing viruses were studied extensively: the RNA-type tumor " retroviruses " (like HIV) and the DNA herpes-type viruses (like the KS virus). The main goals were to collect various forms of cancer tissue and test them in animals; to identify animal and human cancer-causing viruses; to grow large amounts of " candidate human viruses " for testing purposes; and to develop vaccines against these cancer viruses. In essence, the scientists wanted to learn how to use viruses to make cancer - and to force " normal " cells to become cancerous by subjecting to viruses. I have studied the annual Virus Cancer Reports (VCP) covering the years 1971-1974 and 1976-1978. Each report is 300-400 pages, and the cumulative volumes refer to thousands of animal cancer virus and genetic engineering experiments. Biological warfare research, monkey research, and the VCP The annual VCP Reports must be studied with an awareness that the Program became wedded to secret military biological warfare research in the early 1970s. On October 18, 1971, as part of Richard Nixon's War on Cancer, the army's biowarfare research laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland, was permanently joined with the National Cancer Institute; and was re- titled . the Frederick Cancer Research Center. Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor. The primary task of the new Center was " the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) viruses and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis. " Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV and the new KS virus)- and to the successful propagation of significant amounts of " human candidate viruses. " Candidate viruses were defined as animal or human viruses that might cause human cancers. Later, the objective was to determine if such viruses could induce (either alone or with other co-carcinogens) human cancers (1977;58). Biowarfare scientists also had a keen interest in the role of human and non-human primate viruses as " helper viruses " in the production of cancer (1978;54). A steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, cats, etc. ) was necessary; and multiple breeding colonies were established for the VCP. For example, a total of 2,274 primates from Africa and Asia were shipped to Litton for military use in 1971. Forcing cancer viruses into primates and other animals --------- Short version: The $10 million funding for developing a biological weapon which would suppress the human immune system came through the 1970 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. Read it here: http://www.ortiz-lopez.com/Hearings1A.html It was developed in the labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and tested on the population of Zaire - who were told that they were getting the new smallpox vaccine by the World Health Organization and the Centers of Disease Control. (David Rockefeller) In 1979, ads were run in New York, San Francisco, and four other US cities looking for subjects to test the 'new Hepatitis B vaccine' on. They specifically asked for Black males, Hispanic males, promiscuous homosexual males, and intravenous drug users to be part of the test group. They were given AIDS. It's all about population reduction. " The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day. " - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991 " It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. " - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1994. --- ------------------ All of the evidence, seems to indicate that AIDS may have been spread by vaccination.All of the evidence, seems to point to the Small Pox vaccine.Obviously, before the discovery of AIDS, there was no testing for AIDS There is good reason to suspect that AIDS is a man made virus.If AIDS is a man made virus, then we would next wonder; how did man make the virus? The first portion of the process could have been accidental.The accident could have occurred in the small pox vaccine manufacturing process.This would be the step that is called " recombinant synthesis " . " Recombinant synthesis " is a fancy way of describing the " crossing " together of different viruses, and making new viruses . " Recombinant synthesis " could have been done by something as simple as mixing plasma samples that were infected with different types of viruses. Making any of those viruses into a virus that could infect humans would have involved a step; which is not as likely to have occurred accidentally. That is a process called " replicate passage " . This is gradually changing the composition of the plasma; in which the new virus was created, and is living, until the new virus is capable of surviving in humans. There are two above ground biological warfare research facilities in the world:One is at Ft. Dietrich, Maryland. The other is at Sverdlosk, Russia.Both of these are supervised by the United Nations. The United Nations has published its goal of reducing the world's population since the sixties. http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200009050018.html http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aidsplot.htm http://health.iafrica.com/doconline/hiv_and_aids/aidsorigins.htm , Bob Dunbar <robertaldermandunbar wrote: > > http://www.rense.com/general45/cant.htm > The Man-Made Origin of AIDS: > > Are Human and Viral Experiments Responsible > For Unleashing The HIV Holocaust?? > By Alan Cantwell, Jr, MD > c. 2003 > 11-21-3 > > > AIDS in America rarely makes headlines anymore. In the mind of the public the disease is still believed to be a sexually-transmitted disease mostly affecting male homosexuals, drug addicts, prostitutes and promiscuous people. Starting officially in June 1981 as a " gay disease " affecting only a few dozen men, there are now 800,000 reported U.S. AIDS cases and 460,000 deaths, mostly young men. The prediction of a " major threat " to the " general " heterosexual population never happened. > > Every December 1, we commemorate World AIDS Day. This year (2003) there are 36 million people worldwide estimated to be living with AIDS/HIV. Twenty-two million people have died of the disease. > > This year, AIDS will get more attention than usual. On November 16, 2003, CBS was supposed to have to aired " The Reagans " - an unflattering portrait of President Ronald Reagan who presided over the first years of the AIDS epidemic. The miniseries was cancelled due to a flood of protests, particularly over a line in the script where Reagan says, " They that live in sin shall die in sin. " There is no historical evidence that the president ever uttered such a line; and Reagan admirers fumed over the attempt by CBS to " rewrite history. " However, it is a fact that the political infighting between the various federal health agencies, and the shameful refusal of the Reagan administration to fund AIDS research and education, all combined to provide a serious indictment against the government's handling of AIDS in the early years of the American epidemic. Most disconcerting is the fact that Reagan never once uttered the word " AIDS " in public until March 1987, when 16,000 Americans > (mostly gay men) had already died of AIDS. > > More furor over the failure of the Reagan administration to act against the epidemic will undoubtedly escalate when Tony Kushner's famous AIDS-themed play " Angels in America " airs on HBO on December 7. All of this current rehash into the early years of AIDS will lead to a further historical reexamination of the government's role in handling the mysterious outbreak that first began as a gay disease and now is an unstoppable worldwide pandemic. > > But the media and the AIDS scientists have never told the real history of AIDS and its origin to the world public. We are repeatedly told that HIV came from Africa. But how is that sexually and biologically possible? How could a supposedly black African heterosexual disease- that some scientists claim has been around for decades or centuries in Africa- suddenly transform itself into an exclusively white male homosexual disease in America, and at a time when AIDS was unknown in Africa? > > Is AIDS, in reality, a man-made disease originally produced by human experimentation or human error? Could the bio-engineering of dangerous viruses that preceded the " gay plague " be responsible for the origin of AIDS? In view of covert and unethical government- sponsored human radiation experiments that preceded AIDS, is it fair to blame gays, blacks and chimpanzees for a disease that could have been started by vaccine programs utilizing gays and blacks as guinea- pigs? > > These are historical issues that will never be considered by the media in the wake of the AIDS controversies surrounding " The Reagans " and " Angels in America. " However, there is strong evidence to suggest that HIV/AIDS is indeed a man-made disease, and it is time to " rewrite history " to include long-forgotten and suppressed facts about AIDS and its origin. > > By Alan Cantwell, Jr > > > > Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been persistent rumors that the disease was man-made, and that HIV was deliberately " introduced " into the American gay and the African black populations as a germ warfare experiment. This so-called conspiracy theory was quickly squelched by virologists and molecular biolologists, who blamed primates in the African bush and human sexuality for the introduction and spread of HIV. > In the fall of 1986 the Soviets shocked the world by claiming that HIV was secretly developed at Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army's biological warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as " infectious propaganda " , Russian scientists had worked hand in hand with biological warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses and virus-infected tissue into various non-human primates (monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s before AIDS appeared. With improved international relationships, the Russian accusation vanished. > > Although evidence supporting the man-made theory has never been mentioned in the major U.S. media, the theory continues to be ridiculed. For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle,( " Quest for the Origin of AIDS " , January 14, 2001), William Carlsen writes: " In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories attempting to explain the origin of the disease ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a secret CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals and drug addicts; it came from outer space, riding on the tail of a comet. " > > AIDS certainly did not come from the hand of God or outer space. However, there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s in New York City. > > Creating AIDS in animals before the epidemic > Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV as a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer retrovirus experimentation in the " pre-AIDS " years of the 1960s and 70s. Evidence linking the introduction of HIV into gays and blacks via vaccine experiments and programs in the late 1970s has been totally ignored in favor of the politically correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees in the African rain forest, and that HIV " jumped species " into the African population around 1930 or even earlier. > > Conveniently overlooked is the series of outbreaks of AIDS-like epidemics that broke out in U.S. primate centers, beginning in 1969. A decade before AIDS, the first of five recorded epidemics of " simian AIDS " erupted in a colony of stump-tailed macaques housed in a primate lab at Davis, California. Most of the macaques died. Two types of primate immunodeficiency viruses were eventually discovered as the cause. A few silently infected monkeys transferred to the primate colony at Yerkes in Atlanta subsequently died of simian AIDS in the late 1980s. Veterinarians claim the origin of the simian AIDS outbreak is unknown. However, one obvious possibility is the experimental transfer of viruses between various primate species, which is common practice in animal laboratories. > > In 1974 veterinarians actually created an AIDS-like disease when newborn chimps were removed from their mothers and weaned exclusively on virus-infected milk from cows infected with " bovine C- type virus. " Within a year the chimps died of leukemia and pneumocystis pneumonia (the " gay pneumonia " of AIDS). Both diseases had never been observed in chimps before this virus-transfer experiment. > > Also downplayed is the laboratory creation of feline leukemia and " cat AIDS " by the transfer of HIV-like cat retroviruses in the mid-1970s. These experiments were conducted at Harvard by Myron (Max) Essex, later to become a famous AIDS researcher. All this man- made creation of AIDS in laboratory animals directly preceded the " mysterious " 1979 introduction of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in America. > > Nowadays, scientists hunt for " ancestor " viruses of HIV in chimps in the African wild and ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS. No consideration is given to any of these lab viruses as possible man- made ancestors of the many " strains " of HIV (and HIV-2) that jumped species to produce AIDS in humans. > > The gay experiments that preceded AIDS (1978-1981) > > Scientists also discount any connection between the official outbreak of AIDS in 1981 and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine program (1978-1981) at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan that used gays as guinea pigs shortly before the epidemic. Curiously, the exact origin of AIDS in the United States remains unstudied. Health authorities simply blame promiscuous gay men, but never adequately explain how a black heterosexual African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white young gay male disease in Manhattan. > > Researchers claim HIV incubated in Africa for more that a half century until AIDS broke out there in 1982. However, in the U.S. there was no incubation period for gay men. As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin. The hepatitis B experiments began in Manhattan in the fall of 1978; the first few cases of AIDS (all young gays from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979. > > Scientists have also failed to explain how a brand new herpes virus was also introduced exclusively into gays, along with HIV, in the late 1970s. This herpes virus is now believed to be the cause of Kaposi's sarcoma, the so-called " gay cancer " of AIDS. Before AIDS, Kaposi's sarcoma was never seen in healthy young men. Identified a decade after HIV, in 1994, this KS virus is closely related to a primate cancer-causing herpes virus extensively studied and transferred in animal laboratories in the decade before AIDS. > > Also downplayed to the public is a new microbe (Mycoplasma penetrans), also of unknown origin, that was introduced into homosexuals, along with HIV and the new herpes virus. Thus, not one but three new infectious agents were inexplicably transferred into the gay population at the start of the epidemic (HIV, the herpes KS virus, and M.penetrans). > > In his book, Virus [2000], Luc Montagnier (the French virologist who co-discovered HIV) blames promiscuous American gay tourists for bringing this new mycoplasma to Africa, and for bringing back HIV. He provides no evidence for this homophobic theory. Nor does he mention the various mycoplasmas that were passed around in the 1970s in scientific labs, and the fact that these microbes were frequent contaminants in virus cultures and vaccines. > > Why are all these simultaneous introductions of new infectious agents into gay men ignored by scientists? Surely a credible explanation would be important in determining the origin of HIV and AIDS. > > Why are scientists so opposed to the man-made theory? And why do they believe so passionately in the chimp theory? One explanation might be that scientists don't want the public to know what happened to the tens of thousands of imported primates who were held captive in laboratories throughout the world in the decade before AIDS. > > The forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1977) > > Rarely mentioned by AIDS scientists and media reporters is the fact that surgeons have been transplanting chimpanzee parts (and chimp viruses) into people for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964 he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants. > > Much more likely to have spread primate (chimp and monkey) viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the production, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal cancer and immunosuppressive AIDS-like viruses and retroviruses. These laboratory created viruses were capable of inducing disease when transferred between animal species and also when transplanted into human cells and tissue. > > The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-funded program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed to study leukemia, the program was soon enlarged to study all forms of cancer. The scope of the program was international and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and Africa. The mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers from around the world and to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses. As a result, thousands of liters of dangerous man-made viruses were adapted to human cells and shipped around the world to various laboratories. The annual reports of the SVCP contain proof that species jumping of animal viruses was a common occurrence in labs a decade before AIDS. > > The SVCP gathered together the nation's top virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and epidemiologists, to determine the role of viruses and retroviruses in the production of human cancer. Many of the most prestigious medical institutions were involved in this program. > > Connected with the SVCP were the most famous future American AIDS scientists, such as Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Max Essex of " cat AIDS " fame, and Peter Duesberg, who claims HIV does not cause AIDS. Gallo and Essex were also the first to promote the widely accepted African green monkey theory of AIDS. This theory was proven erroneous as far back as 1988, but was heavily circulated among AIDS educators and the media until the theory was superceded by the chimp theory in the late 1990s. > > Biowarfare research, primate research and the SVCP > > Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the military's biological warfare researchers. On October 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be converted to cancer research. As part of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled the new Frederick Cancer Research Center, and Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor for this project. According to the 1971 SVPC annual report, the primary task of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Center was " the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis. " Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and " the successful propagation of significant amounts of human candidate > viruses. " Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses that might cause human cancers. > For these experiments a steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary; and multiple breeding colonies were established for the SVCP. Primates were shipped in from West Africa and Asia for experimentation; and virus- infected animals were shipped out to various labs worldwide. By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to other primate centers. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild). By the early 1970s, experimenters had transferred cancer- causing viruses into several species of monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to the new Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus that produced the " gay cancer " of AIDS in 1979. > > In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed. > > The U.S. is the world's leading consumer of primates, and 55,000 are used yearly in medical research. Primates (especially newborn and baby chimpanzees) are the most favored lab animals because they are similar biochemically and immunologically to human beings. Humans share 98.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Chimps were extensively used by SVCP because there would be no official testing of " candidate " lab viruses on humans. > > In the decade before AIDS, Gallo was a project officer of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkey viruses, into newborn macaques (a small species of monkey that carries a close relative of the KS virus). > > Recorded in the 1971 SVCP report (NIH-71-2025), Gallo's project notes state: " Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations, and subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates to man justifies utilization of these animals for these purposes. " > > Researchers at Bionetics injected human and animal cancer material into various species of monkeys to determine the cancer effect. Newborn and irradiated monkeys were injected with blood ( " using multiple sites and volumes as large as possible " ) taken from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated into primates. How many " new " and " emerging " viruses were created and adapted to human tissue and to various primates is not known. > Some primates were released back into the wild carrying lab viruses with them. The possible spread of these lab viruses to other animals in the wild has been ignored by scientists searching for the origin of HIV and its close relatives in African animals. > Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. Germ free colonies of inbred mice were established. Mouse cancer viruses were manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains. These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement experiments. Such experiments utilized a weakened strain of the mouse > leukemia virus to infect and " taxi-in " the missing genes to genetically-defective human beings. > > The end of the SVCP and the birth of AIDS > By 1977 the SVCP came to an inglorious end. According to Gallo, " Scientifically, the problem was that no one could supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus, and most researchers refused to concede that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce dramatic, visible results. " > > Despite all this, the SVCP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, > molecular biology, and the human genome project. More than any other program > it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses in humans. > > As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs in government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. These same cities would soon become the three primary epicenters for the new " gay-related immune deficiency syndrome, " later known as AIDS. > > Two years after the termination of the SCVP, the introduction of HIV into gay men (along with a herpes virus and a mycoplasma) miraculously revived retroviral research and made Gallo the most famous scientist in the world. > > Could virus-contaminated hepatitis vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees. To this day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS. > > Was HIV (and the KS herpes virus and a new mycoplasma) introduced into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals were injected in Manhattan beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities in 1980-1981? > > As mentioned, the first gay AIDS cases erupted in Manhattan a few months after the gay experiment began at the NY Blood Center. When a blood test for HIV became available in the mid-1980s, the Center's stored gay blood specimens were reexamined. Most astonishing is the statistically significant fact that 20% of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a year before the AIDS epidemic became " official " in 1981). This signifies that Manhattan gays in 1980 had the highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. And epidemic cases in Africa did not appear until 1982. > > Although denied by the AIDS establishment, a few researchers are convinced that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through which HIV was introduced into the gay population. My own extensive research into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic [1988], and in Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993]. These books also debunk the preposterous " Patient Zero " story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought AIDS to America. The highly implausible story was sensationalized in the media and served to further obscure the origin of AIDS in America and blame gay promiscuity. Even Montagnier is doubtful that the U.S. epidemic could have developed from a single patient. > > Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp theory is the fact that the New York Blood Center established a chimp virus laboratory in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. A few years later this vaccine was inoculated into gays at the Center. > > Chimps were captured from various parts of West Africa and brought to VILAB. Alfred Prince, Head of virology at the NY Blood Center, has been the director of Vilab for the past 25 years. The lab prides itself by releasing " rehabilitated " chimps back into the wild. > Also closely allied with " pre-AIDS " development of a hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicized primate colony outside New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and primate parts for transplantation and virus research. > Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the New York University Medical Center, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in 1979. Researchers at NYU Medical Center were also heavily involved in the development of the experimental hepatitis B vaccine used in gays; and the Medical Center received government grants and contracts connected with biological warfare research beginning in 1969, according to Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola [1996]. > > Scientific disinformation and the 1959 HIV-positive blood test from Africa > > By predating HIV back to the 1930s, the chimp theory effectively discredits the man-made theory of AIDS, which dates the introduction of HIV to the late 1970s. Only time will tell whether the chimp theory will hold up to further scientific scrutiny. > > Conspiracy theorists believe some widely published AIDS origin stories in the media are merely examples of scientific disinformation designed to cover-up the man-made origin of HIV. One example is the famous Patient Zero story. Another is the media blitz surrounding the English sailor who supposedly contracted AIDS in 1959. This now-disproven story made worldwide headlines in 1990 and obviously served to contradict the underground conspiracy theory (particularly among African-Americans) that AIDS was man-made. > The New York Times (July 24, 1990) declared: " The case also refutes the widely publicized charges made by Soviet officials several years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from a laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological warfare agent. The human retrovirus group to which the AIDS virus belongs was unknown at the time. Nor did scientists then have the genetic engineering techniques needed to create a virus. " Several years later, the case was discovered to be not a case of AIDS because the sailor's tissue remains were accidentally (or deliberately) contaminated with HIV. > In 1998 the media alerted the public to further evidence that AIDS started in Africa. The proof consisted of an old 1959 stored frozen blood specimen discovered to be HIV-positive. Researchers claimed the tiny amount of serum contained fragments of HIV " closely related " to a virus found in 3 chimpanzees in the African wild and in the frozen remains of a chimp named Marilyn, discovered in a freezer at Fort Detrick. > The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the " world's oldest HIV-positive blood sample " ) are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the ancestor virus of HIV. > > When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing and included in a report, " Population Genetic Studies, " published in 1966. Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic tests. > In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982. Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab. > > Three specimens initially tested HIV-positive, but finally only the 1959 specimen from the unidentified Bantu man was confirmed HIV- positive. Around the time of these examinations, Essex's lab was unknowingly contaminated with primate viruses. > In 1986, Essex discovered a new " human " AIDS virus that later proved to be a contaminating monkey virus. The source of the primate virus traced back to a captive monkey at a primate center in nearby Southborough, Massachusetts. This primate contamination at his lab resulted in the erroneous green monkey theory, heavily popularized by Gallo and the media. > > Also unpublicized is the little known fact that Gallo's lab at the National Cancer Institute was plagued with contamination by primate viruses. In 1975 he reported a new human " HL-23 " virus that eventually proved to be three contaminating ape primate viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his research. > > In 1996 Hooper convinced Nahmias to turn over the remaining 1959 specimen to David Ho of Rockefeller University in Manhattan for PCR testing. In 1996 Ho was named Time magazine's " Man of the Year " , at a time when few people had ever heard of him. Ho is also the director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, affiliated with Rockefeller University since 1996. The Diamond Center is also now connected with the New York Blood Center, home of the gay vaccine experiments that gave birth to AIDS. > Ho determined the tiny amount of the remaining specimen did not contain live virus, nor was the complete virion of the virus present. Instead, some fragments of the virus (about 15% of the total genome) were tested and presented to the scientific world as the oldest specimen of HIV in the world. Ho's PCR results cannot be confirmed by independent investigators because the 1959 specimen is now totally used up. > > When published in the journal Nature on February 5, 1998 ( " An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin of the epidemic " ), Hooper's name appeared on the report, along with Ho, Bette Korber, Nahmias, and others, The report was heavily publicized as proof that HIV existed in the African population in 1959. > Although there are no HIV-positive tissue specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS either, Hooper relies heavily on this 1959 test to support his theory that HIV entered the African population via the polio vaccines programs in the late 1950s. > > In The River Hooper quickly dismisses the claims of physician Robert Strecker, the first whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as the research in Horowitz's Emerging Viruses, and in my own books, AIDS & The Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood. > In condemning AIDS biowarfare research, Hooper declares, " Sadly, supporters of the Streckers have continued to peddle their ill- informed and outdated versions of the myth, blaming variously the Soviets, the CIA, the Germans, and the World Health Organization (WHO) well into the nineties. " He dismisses the hepatitis B vaccine connection to AIDS by noting that only two of the 826 gay vaccinees had developed AIDS by 1983. Hooper ignores the fact that by 1981 over 20% of the men in the trials were HIV-positive and that by 1982, over 30% of the men were HIV-positive. He dismisses the World Health Organization's African smallpox vaccine connection by saying, " there is no reason for either HIV or SIV [simian immunodeficiency virus] to be accidentally present in the vaccine. " Hooper fails to consider the possibility that the vaccines could have been deliberately contaminated with HIV. Hooper has been a United Nations official, but no details of this are included in his book . > > Despite his massive research, Hooper seems naïve about the continuing transfer of viruses between various primate species at primate centers. For example, in 1995 he interviewed Preston Marx at LEMSIP. At that time Marx was a representative of David Ho's organization, the Aaron Diamond Research Center. Hooper writes: " I was shocked by the cavalier way in which tissues and sera from one species had been introduced into other species, long after the risks of cross-species transfer had been highlighted by the SV40 [polio vaccine] debacle, and I was astonished that survivors from troops that had been stricken by mystery illnesses could have been casually sold to other centers, for use in experiments there. Furthermore, this apparent lack of monitoring and central control seemed to be echoed in other fields, like xenotransplantation (the transplanting of organ or cells from one species to another) - and here, of course, the implications were even more frightening. " > > By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignored all those animal viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s, and all those dangerous viral creations that were genetically altered for cancer research, vaccine research, and secret biological warfare. > The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick > > On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, longtime physician-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported " the riddle of the origin of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved. " A team of researchers, headed by Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three chimps in the African wild and had also studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered by accident in a freezer at Fort Detrick. The chimp had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of all this research, Hahn declared that a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the animal source of the virus " most closely " related to HIV. > > In a media blitz U.S. government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral " family tree " of primate viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was genetically descended from a chimp virus in the African bush. Molecular analysis of virus genetic data, performed by Bette Korber and the supercomputer Nirvana at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, indicated that HIV had jumped species from a chimp to a human in Africa around the year 1930. (Los Alamos is the official home of nuclear bomb-building, alleged Chinese spies, and the laboratory which directed secret human radiation experiments on unsuspecting civilians from the 1940s up to the beginning of the AIDS epidemic.) > > Beatrice Hahn theorized that the epidemic started when a hunter cut himself while butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected. Scientists readily accepted Hahn's notion that the AIDS virus and its closest relatives jumped species from chimps to humans on multiple occasions, thereby explaining the origin of the three separate subtypes of HIV-1 (M, N, and O), as well as HIV-2. > > Chimps in West Africa are hunted for food, as well as for medical experimentation. Young chimps are especially prized for scientific research and are usually caught by shooting their mothers. Many die from stress and inhumane conditions during capture and transport to laboratories and zoos in Western nations. > > Due to all this killing, chimps are now an endangered species. During the past century the African chimp population has dropped from two million to less than 150,000. Despite the mass killing of chimps, they are still blamed for causing the worldwide epidemic of AIDS. > Beatrice Hahn is no stranger to primate theories, having worked in Gallo's lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980s and the " close relationship " of the monkey virus to HIV. Now Hahn's virus was claimed to be a closer relative than the contaminating monkey virus in Essex' lab that formed the basis of the false green monkey theory. > > Media journalists paid no attention to these discrepancies. Hahn's new chimp findings, along with the old 1959 blood specimen, fully convinced the > AIDS establishment, and an adoring media, that Africa was indeed the source of HIV and the AIDS epidemic. > > The 2000 London Origin of AIDS Conference > > When Hooper's book appeared in the fall of 1998, molecular scientists quickly used the new chimp virus data to completely discredit Hooper's polio vaccine theory. AIDS in Africa could not be caused by a virus jumping species in the 50s if it had already jumped species back in the 1930s. Researchers refused to believe scientists could have played any role in the origin of HIV and AIDS. > > Hooper bypassed the biowarfare theory by predating HIV back to the 50s. Now scientists bypassed Hooper by dating HIV back several decades earlier. The fact that there was no African epidemic until the early 1980s did not seem pertinent. To make their view official, a small group of scientists proposed an " invitation only " meeting to settle the origin matter once and for all. > > In October 2000 the Royal Society of London held a two-day conference on the origins of HIV. Obviously, the biowarfare theory of AIDS was not discussed. On the contrary, one professor emphatically declared " all human infectious diseases have an animal origin. " Although there never was a disease like AIDS (until scientists started to flagrantly pass viruses around to repeatedly break the species barrier ), the same professor declared that " natural transfer of these infections is a common event in animal populations. " > Using the viral fragments from the 1959 specimen and comparing them with the select viruses contained in the data bank at Los Alamos , Betty Korber refined her computer calculations to establish a likely date of 1940, " with confidence levels extending from 1871 to 1955. " The Rega Institute in Antwerp estimated the transfer could have occurred between 1590 and 1760, with 1675 the most likely date. > Hooper spoke but his views were largely ignored by the molecular biologists. Preston Marx warned about more human diseases caused by viruses emerging from primates, None of the speakers mentioned what happened to the thousands of liters of animal viruses that were passed around the world by the Special Virus Cancer Program in the decade before AIDS. > > Instead, the London conferees alerted the public to a new view of medical science, championed by the virologists. The " Last Word " at the conference was that " all human viral infections were initially zoonotic (animal) in origin. Animals will always provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human populations in the future. " And the scientists predicted: " There is still a myriad of current unknown viruses in animal populations on land, sea, and air with the potential to cause human disease. " Apparently, none of these viruses were in animal laboratories. > > > AIDS, cancer, genetic science and covert human medical experimentation > Although rejected completely by most scientists, the man-made theory of AIDS is a rational explanation for the origin of HIV. This theory is partly based on an awareness of the gene-polluting activities and species jumping virus experiments of irresponsible scientists during the two decades before the epidemic. > > In addition, the record clearly shows that scientists and biowarfare scientists experiment secretly on unsuspecting people. Horrific aspects of the Cold War Human Radiation Experiments attest to the fact that covert medical experimentation is not an " X-Files " fantasy or a totally paranoid belief. > > It is easy to understand why researchers might want to obscure the man-made origin for AIDS and blame primates. It is now apparent that most of the major researchers promoting the African primate origin of AIDS were connected with the largely secret Special Virus Cancer Program, or are scientists involved in the transfer of viruses in animal research, particularly primate research. > > From the very beginning of the epidemic, researchers disclaimed any connection between AIDS and cancer, as well as any connection between HIV and animal retrovirus cancer research. In 1984, Gallo originally named HIV a cancer-causing " leukemia/lymphoma " virus. To obscure the cancer connection, the name was immediately changed to " lymphotropic " virus. > > My own Kaposi's sarcoma research, first published in medical journals in 1981, showed " cancer-associated bacteria " as possible infectious agents in " classic " KS tumors. Before HIV was discovered in 1984, additional papers in 1982 and 1983 showed similar cancer bacteria in the enlarged lymph nodes and KS tumors of gay men with " gay cancer " and AIDS. Since the 1950s, cancer-associated bacteria have been linked to viruses, as well as to mycoplasmas. This aspect of cancer research has been suppressed for decades by the cancer establishment. A history of this research and its relevancy to AIDS is the subject of my books, AIDS: The Mystery and the Solution [1984] and The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS and Other Immune Diseases [1990]. > > Gallo, in his 1991 book, falsely claims that no infectious agent had ever been found in KS. The refusal of AIDS scientists to recognize cancer microbe research, published in peer reviewed scientific journals, is a further indication that the AIDS establishment seeks to control all aspects of HIV research in such a way as to never connect the origin of AIDS with previous cancer research and covert biological warfare research. This cover-up conceals the possibility that AIDS, in reality, is a new man-made form of infectious and contagious cancer. > > Could a small coterie of government scientists concoct a bogus (but scientifically plausible) primate theory of AIDS origin and bamboozle the public to believe it in order to cover-up the truth? > > In the 1930s the highly respected German scientific community was entirely transformed by fascist beliefs proclaiming the genetic inferiority of the Jews and the genetic superiority of the German Master Race. This Nazi takeover of science and the media eventually led to the murder of millions in the Holocaust. Could the genetic science surrounding the origin of AIDS obscure a genocidal and world depopulation program of man-made origin? > It is time for the man-made theory of HIV to be examined fairly. Proponents of this theory should not be dismissed as paranoid conspiracy theorists; and AIDS educators should educate themselves about this hidden history of AIDS and its implications for the origin of HIV. > > How many more species jumping viruses will we have to endure before we question the integrity and the agenda of scientists who still blissfully jump viruses between species in animal laboratories? > > Lawrence K. Altman, the Times reporter who in 1999 wrote that the origin of the AIDS virus was solved, recently asked " Where did AIDS come from? " Now seemingly undecided, Altman answers, " We can only guess. Determining the answer would be important because discovering how AIDS came to be an epidemic might prevent a similar catastrophe in the future. " ( " The AIDS questions that linger, " January 30, 2001). > It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how researchers could have created HIV and how they could have transferred the virus to gays and blacks in a covert medical experimentation for genocidal or population control purposes. > > The secrecy and scientific disinformation surrounding the Human Radiation Experiments of the Cold War era has taught us how easily government scientists can fool the public on scientific matters. And when it comes to scientific monkey business, researchers know that most people are chumps. > > [Dr. Cantwell is a retired dermatologist and AIDS and cancer researcher, who has written extensively on the man-made origin of AIDS. E-mail address: alanrcan Dr, Cantwell's books are available toll-free in the USA from Book Clearing House @ 1-800-431- 1579, and on the internet at Amazon.com > > > REFERENCES: > > Cantwell AR Jr: Bacteriologic investigation and histologic observations of variably acid-fact bacteria in three cases of Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth 45: 79-89, 1981. > Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of pleomorphic, variably acid- fast > bacteria in a fatal case of Kaposi's sarcoma. Journal of Dermatologic > Surgery and Oncology 7: 923-930, 1981. > Cantwell AR Jr: Variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in a case of reactive lymph > node hyperplasia occurring in a young male homosexual. Growth 46: > 331-336, 1982. > Cantwell AR Jr: Kaposi's sarcoma and variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in two > homosexual men. Cutis 32: 58-74, 1983. > Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case > of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth > 47: 129-134, 1983. > > Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS:The Mystery & the Solution. Los Angeles: Aries > Rising Press, 1984. > Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS & The Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of > the AIDS Epidemic. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1988. > Cantwell Jr, A: The Cancer Microbe. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1990. > Cantwell Jr, A: Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot. Los Angeles: > Aries Rising Press, 1993. > Cantwell AR Jr: " Gay cancer, emerging viruses, and AIDS. " New Dawn > (Melbourne), Sept 1998. > Faden RR (Chair): The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the > President's Advisory Committee. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. > Gallo R: Virus Hunting: AIDS, Cancer and the Human Retrovirus. New York: > Basic Books, 1991. > Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Boston, MA: > Little, Brown and Company, 1999 > Horowitz LG: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Rockport, MA: Tetrahedron > Publishing Group, 1996. > Lee RE: AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time-Bomb? Biographical > Publishing Company, Prospect, CT, 2000. > Montagnier L: Virus. New York: WW Norton Co, Inc, 2000. > Special Virus Cancer Program (Progress Report #8). Bethesda, MD: National > Institutes of Health, August 1971. > http://www.rense.com/general45/cant.htmAlan Cantwell <alancantwell wrote: Alan Cantwell <alancantwell > Re: All 11- and 12-year-old girls would get MANDATORY shots against cervical cancer.? > Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:59:12 -0700 > Bob Dunbar <robertaldermandunbar > > Remember it was Merck (long history of biowarfare connections between > George Merck, the founder -- headed b/w research under Roosevelt in > WW2) -- Merck made the experimental hepatitis B vaccine injected into > gays THAT IMMEDIATELY PRECEEDED THE OUTBREAK OF 'GAY PLAGUE' = AIDS IN > NYC Gay men. > > > Results 1 - 10 of about 2,130,000 English pages for HEPATITIS B VACCINE > + AIDS. (0.09 seconds) > > > > > Hepatitis B vaccine experiment > Hepatitis B vaccine experiment & AIDS Hepatitis vaccination. " There is > no question that HIV was introduced into the US male homosexual > population via the ... > www.whale.to/v/hepb1.html - 5k - Cached - Similar pages > > > On Jul 4, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Bob Dunbar wrote: > > > ( " mandated " to those unfortunate enough to still be in public school > > system) > > > > What sort of testing was done do you suppose? Could vaccine have > > that AIDS characteristic==that is being ethno-specific? Who were test > > subjects? NOW we're getting to the real nitty-gritty of population > > control with government forced chemicals on ALL potential mothers. > > Has Merck management developed a 'Chutzpah' pill for use by > > their head criminals; I'd have thought on the heels of VIOXX murders, > > they'd have elected to go for a little lower profile. $360 per > > jabbing. Could any government subsidy be in the cards? These guys are > > RELENTLESS--- Wonder if Rumsfeld or Krongard or any FDA officials are > > heavily invested in their stock? Is a bear Catholic? Are you mad > > yet? UncBob > Alan Cantwell M.D. > > alancantwell > > http://www.ariesrisingpress.com > > FOUR WOMEN AGAINST CANCER: > Bacteria, Cancer and the Origin of Life > > > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2006 Report Share Posted September 1, 2006 Thanks for great info and links; you hit the nail on the head---POPULATION REDUCTION--most folks have a hard time with the idea that our " leaders " want most of us gone... see The Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy <http://www.planetquo.com/The-Haig-Kissinger-Depopulation-Policy> Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective- then ... rename Brzezinski's arc of crisis doctrine the 'arc of population crisis'. ... www.planetquo.com/The-Haig-Kissinger-Depopulation-PolicyPeak Oil, Pandemic, and 78 Dead Scientists <http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scient\ ists.htm> Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger are trustees of the Center for Strategic and ... If global population reduction is not the primary objective, ... www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scientists.htm Zbigniew Brzezinski <http://www.csis.org/experts/4brzez.htm> and Henry Kissinger <http://www.csis.org/experts/4kissinger.htm> are trustees of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Their Seven Revolutions project identifies seven areas of global challenge. The first is population growth and the second is global resource management. http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scienti\ sts.htm <http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scient\ ists.htm> Thanks, UncBob , " savefreedom2005 " <savefreedom2005 wrote: > > The Origin of AIDS > > Either all, or nearly all, of the AIDS virus, on this planet, > can be traced back to the United Nations administered Small Pox > vaccine. > If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year, > that graph does not regress back gradually to one case. > It regresses back to thousands of infections, > starting at the time of the United Nations administered Small Pox > vaccine, > in Africa. > > It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan > to reduce the world's population. It's all about population > reduction. > --- > ------------------ > " The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by > encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human > reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as > excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day. " > - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991 > > " It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be > stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. > This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. " > - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1994. > > --- > ------------------ > > The origin of The AIDS virus, also appears to be a United Nations > supervised facility, at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, > Maryland. > > Biowarfare is ALWAYS supervised by the United Nations; > by way of a treaty (United Nations Convention). > > There are two such labs in the world: > Fort Detrick, Maryland and Sverdlosk, Russia. > Both are staffed by the same people, > and both are supervised by the United Nations. > > AIDS was not originally transferred to man via a monkey in Africa > That was the original theory, which has been discredited. > > The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of the " AIDS like " virus in the green monkey > is not similar to The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of " AIDS " virus in humans. > > The DNA CODON SEQUENCE " AIDS " virus in humans is 50% similar to > sheep Visna, and 50% similar to Bovine Leukemia. > This indicates that the most probable origin of AIDS was a > recombinant synthesis between to sheep Visna and Bovine Leukemia. > This part could have been done by accident. It would only involve > mixing sheep Visna infected plasma with Bovine Leukemia infected > plasma. Of course this is ALSO an interspecies cross up. > > HERE IS THE PROBLEM; > Recombinant synthesis usually produces nothing else > except " incompetents " > (Virus that cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere > ELSE except where they were formed). > Recombinant synthesis occurs by accident, > on a regular basis, > but does not present a significant danger, > due to the fact that the " incompetents " cannot live, cannot > reproduce, or cannot live anywhere > ELSE except where they were formed. > > The next step could not have been an accident. > The next step would have had to be REPLICATE PASSAGE. > REPLICATE PASSAGE involves gradually changing the medium of > an " incompetent " ; which cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they > were formed. > In this way the virus in adapted to live in a new species. > Thus an incompetent virus that originated from interspecies cross up > involving sheep and cows, > can be made to be capable of living in Humans. > > http://www.konformist.com/1999/aids/manmade.txt > >======snip======= > Peter MacKenzie: " I have heard and seen reports of the possible > artificial > origin of the AIDS virus, but until this report have not seen such > compelling evidence of its truth. Mr. MacKenzie has assembled a > remarkable > documentation of heretofore unpublished data, and an immediate > governmental > investigation at the highest level should be commenced. " > Samuel Evans, Chairman of the National Council of Public Auditors, > sent the > following letter to every member of Congress in 1989: > " I address this letter to you requesting a Congressional > investigation into > the 'allegations' that our government is financing research and > development > through genetic heredity engineering to multiply certain viruses to > kill > specific racial groups...The multitude of allegations, statements, > news > articles and personal testimony demands prompt clarification. For > instance, > it is alleged: > 1. That Col. David L. Huxsoll, commander of the U.S. Army Research > Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., has received > $60 > million for research in biological ethnic weapons. > 2. That it might be possible to wage ethnic warfare by developing > substances that affect one race more than another. According to > Newsweek > magazine, Jan. 16, 1989, an example would include 'Valley fever, > which is > much more likely to kill blacks than whites.' Another substance, > developed > at a southern California university, is believed to kill only people > with > melanin in their skin. > 3. That it is a coincidence that Fort Detrick, which is where Col. > Huxsoll's biological research is being conducted, is also the site > of AIDS > research.... > These allegations go to the very root of our constitutional form > of > government and basic world human rights, and must be responded to by > elected > governmental officials on all levels. The United Nations has published its goal of reducing the > world's population since the sixties. > http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200009050018.html > http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aidsplot.htm > http://health.iafrica.com/doconline/hiv_and_aids/aidsorigins.htm > , Bob Dunbar > robertaldermandunbar@ wrote: > > > > http://www.rense.com/general45/cant.htm > > The Man-Made Origin of AIDS: > > > > Are Human and Viral Experiments Responsible > > For Unleashing The HIV Holocaust?? > > By Alan Cantwell, Jr, MD > > c. 2003 > > 11-21-3 > > > > > > AIDS in America rarely makes headlines anymore. In the mind of the > public the disease is still believed to be a sexually-transmitted > disease mostly affecting male homosexuals, drug addicts, prostitutes > and promiscuous people. Starting officially in June 1981 as a " gay > disease " affecting only a few dozen men, there are now 800,000 > reported U.S. AIDS cases and 460,000 deaths, mostly young men. The > prediction of a " major threat " to the " general " heterosexual > population never happened. > > > > Every December 1, we commemorate World AIDS Day. This year (2003) > there are 36 million people worldwide estimated to be living with > AIDS/HIV. Twenty-two million people have died of the disease. ======snip========= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 While Hooper's theory fails to include a few important parameters, so too does the report from Wistar scientists on the sequencing of chaimpanzee SIVcpz/HIV-1. It will have been much more relevant to this group when it is realized that the Chinese gave the first world report to verify that HIV/AIDS is a reversible disease, involving a study in Tanzania which used only four TCM herbs. Their study (1995) showed HIV-serum negative/intranuclear-positive state maintained. , " savefreedom2005 " <savefreedom2005 wrote: > > The Origin of AIDS > > Either all, or nearly all, of the AIDS virus, on this planet, > can be traced back to the United Nations administered Small Pox > vaccine. > If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year, > that graph does not regress back gradually to one case. > It regresses back to thousands of infections, > starting at the time of the United Nations administered Small Pox > vaccine, > in Africa. > > It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan > to reduce the world's population. It's all about population > reduction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2007 Report Share Posted April 8, 2007 It became much clearer to me what the population reduction people fear when I watched http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7374585792978336967 and he related near the end of the film the projections of a group based in California. Of course all projections and theories are based on a particular set of conditions. I think necessity is the mother of invention and am not so bleak in my prognostications. All the best Kirk BTW Robert Strecker made a video re the genesis of AIDS --- In , " robertaldermandunbar " <robertaldermandunbar wrote: > > > Thanks for great info and links; you hit the nail on the > head---POPULATION REDUCTION--most folks have a hard time with the idea > that our " leaders " want most of us gone... see > > The Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy > <http://www.planetquo.com/The-Haig-Kissinger-Depopulation- Policy> > Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective- > then ... rename Brzezinski's arc of crisis doctrine the 'arc of > population crisis'. ... > www.planetquo.com/The-Haig-Kissinger-Depopulation-PolicyPeak Oil, > Pandemic, and 78 Dead Scientists > <http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scie nt\ > ists.htm> Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger are trustees of > the Center for Strategic and ... If global population reduction is not > the primary objective, ... > www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scientists.h tm > Zbigniew Brzezinski <http://www.csis.org/experts/4brzez.htm> and Henry > Kissinger <http://www.csis.org/experts/4kissinger.htm> are trustees of > the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Their Seven > Revolutions project identifies seven areas of global challenge. The > first is population growth and the second is global resource management. > http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scien ti\ > sts.htm > <http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scie nt\ > ists.htm> > > > Thanks, UncBob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.