to krishnadas

[Guest guest]

Krishnadas,

 

I could not reply, the other thread was closed. Probably better, we both were getting a bit personal. I will use this to end our debate more friendly.

 

My first reaction on your first posts was to show that the mumber of threads with some effort to convert that I counted ( jan-june) and published ain't that much to me. It seems we have a disagreement here. Well.. lets respect that and leave it that way.

 

The other thing is that we both agree hare krishnas is missionary. We have some sort of agreement here.

 

About the other topics. Yes they are off-topic, at least in this thread or better said the tread : "why..."

 

We have debated and we don't agree this time. No problem,lets shake hands, thnx and we will meet again in another thread.

 

regards

 

 

 

[krishnadasa]

[[The other thing is that we both agree hare krishnas is missionary. We have some sort of agreement here.]]

 

dude how do ya define missionary , lemme know that first.If u compare them with the either christian or muslim ones, then dear I should say I dun agree with this.As you see most of the so called missionaries have always done things otherwis- meaning forceful conversion or misuisng the poverty- thats no good right?

 

do ya find HKs doin that? i dun think so. dude it started in rich (materially) country like US, so no scope for forceful conversion- and Yet they have followers.

 

[[[We have debated and we don't agree this time. No problem,lets shake hands, thnx and we will meet again in another thread]]]

 

Ya i m always there to do that, our anscestors did it with virtually everyone , so do I

 

Chant harri nama and be happy