Himalayan/Celtic Sea Salt - good/bad PLUS OFF TOPIC

[Guest guest]

Thanks, paddlerwoman.

My deductions seem reasonable to me. Now I should take the time to research

other entities in order to improve on the understandings.

P.S. - when I scrolled down on your reply and saw my reply, there was weird

script around my numbers 1 and 2 - an A with a little tent thing over it. Did

anybody else see this, too? Also, in my efforts to trim previous material and

ads when I reply, I realize that the sentences of the past replies are broken

and continued on the next line, making too much space, so I " reset " it back to

how it should be, but then when I open the email I sent to the group when it

comes back, my work in doing so is broken up again! Is this just MY settings,

or is it this way regardless?

Thanks, Tiffany

 

paddlerwoman wrote:

Tiffany,

I don't have the answer to number one. But my interpretation of what I posted is

that at the angstrom size it goes into the cells, the body uses what it needs,

and what you don't need passes out of the body without harming you, I would

think through sweat, urine, feces.

Tammy

 

On Mar 29, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Tiffany wrote:

 

Don & paddlerwoman,

> Â From reading both of your posts, it seems that sodium chloride is

> corrosive BECAUSE it builds up in the tissues to toxic levels BECAUSE

> it isn't ionic/angstrom-sized. Right?

> Â Â

>  1. How IS sodium chloride corrosive?

>  2. Would sodium chloride NOT be corrosive as long as it is ionic

> and angstrom sized?

> Â Â

> Â -Tiffany