Guest guest Posted July 20, 2005 Report Share Posted July 20, 2005 For those of us who make our own almond milk, this is sort of a no-man's land....When I 'googled', all the info I found was either for commercial products, or for a recipe that was 885 calories per serving---4 cups almonds, 4 cups water, a little honey, all blended together and served as is! My own recipe (which is now mostly used for my husband's cereals!) was 1 cup almonds, soaked , blended in 6 cups water with 6 dates, and then strained before using. So I really have no clue what the calories would be, or the breakdown of nutrients, but I am positive it's nowhere near 885 calories per serving! :-) Peace, Valerie ________ I suggested Google-ing for 2 reasons: 1. To encourage people to seek answers on their own. Many of the questions asked in these boards are as easily answered by the asker as by the eventual answerer. 2. To introduce precisely the problem Valerie has uncovered above. Sometimes we have to dig and think and extrapolate to come up with approximate " answers " to the questions people ask, they are not always cut-and-dried, even for the " simplest " of questions. Anyone could look up " almonds " and learn that 100 gm -- 3.5 ounces -- packs a walloping 578 calories. And 3.5 ounces does not fill a cup!! The simple fact is that almonds really do have that many calories -- and 73% of them are from fat. So now, Valerie and all, I encourage you to ask yourself a question...why, in the face of data that clearly points you in one direction, would you instead simply deny the data? Low-water, high-fat foods are VERY high-calorie foods, there is little one can do about it. Conclusion: almond milk -- all nut or seed milks -- are very high in both calories and fat and are therefore treats, not foods in any regular sense. Best to all, Elchanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2005 Report Share Posted July 20, 2005 You are right, Elchanan, and that's once of the reasons it remains a 'treat' for me; but for my husband, who is still eating a basically SAD diet, it's one of the things I've been able to introduce him to in order to help him wean of dairy products, so it's still a regular item at our house. Peace, Valerie " INFO @ Vibrant Life " <VLinfo wrote: So now, Valerie and all, I encourage you to ask yourself a question...why, in the face of data that clearly points you in one direction, would you instead simply deny the data? Low-water, high-fat foods are VERY high-calorie foods, there is little one can do about it. Conclusion: almond milk -- all nut or seed milks -- are very high in both calories and fat and are therefore treats, not foods in any regular sense. Best to all, Elchanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2005 Report Share Posted July 20, 2005 You are right, Elchanan, and that's once of the reasons it remains a 'treat' for me; but for my husband, who is still eating a basically SAD diet, it's one of the things I've been able to introduce him to in order to help him wean of dairy products, so it's still a regular item at our house. Peace, Valerie ______ Ahhh, now that's a different application! Of course, any nut or seed milk would be a good replacement for any animal milk. Thanks for the added intention! Elchanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.