Guest guest Posted March 18, 2007 Report Share Posted March 18, 2007 Kadee, (This is long as many of my posts can be.) As a veterinarian, I can completely empathize with the attitude you may receive from some under-educated vets. I find that fear is the most common reason for this behavior (however, there are some that have a God Complex). While I practiced solo for a while, I also worked as an independent contractor or a " doc on the clock " and have had to listen to a lot of BS. In doing your own research, you probably found that the scientific research is collected by certain governing bodies (academies) and protocols are established to be practice guidelines for the general veterinarian. For instance, the American Association of Feline Practitioner for cats and the American Board of Veterinary Practitioners for dogs and other small animals. They both have protocols on vaccines, parasites, neutering, dental care, geriatric care etc. I realize that the military sometimes provides preventive vet services at a reduced cost. But you may be more comfortable finding a vet belonging to one of these groups. They absolutely do have protocols for reduced vaccines and longer vaccine intervals. You SHOULD be able to hold attitude free conversations with most of them. They should be involved in the latest research/education and want to bring that info to their clients. (Beware the vet that joins groups for advertising purposes but never pays attention to the info.) There are also veterinarians that provide alternative modalities such as herbal medicine, nosodes, acupuncture, etc. (Be sure to check their credentials in this area.) Anyway, sometimes understanding a person's fear makes it easier to accept, but not necessarily agree with, their view. In regard to fear and vaccines: 1. It is true that many vets are under educated and don't take the time to read the new research. But many adopt a wait and see approach. They want the research to be proven clinically over time. This can certainly be helpful at the beginning of a new idea but many people carry it too far, too long. There are some that are truly worried about being sued if an unvaccinated animal becomes ill or dies from a preventable disease under their care. This is a concern I have also heard voiced among pediatricians. There was some truth in this when the new information was surfacing, but really not now. 2. ALL businesses work on increasing gross income and decreasing expenses to be profitable. In a high overhead enterprise such as vet medicine, this can mean the difference between closing or remaining open. Paying the utilities and staff is the only way to be available to help animals. (This was different in the 70's when over head was low and has become less of a problem recently with new vets being taught practice management. I know there are some practices in large cities that do well but many vets make the same take home as a dental technician - 2 years of study vs. 8 -10 years with $100,000 in student loans. You can see where fear is building). Anyway, in the past the annual health exam has been charged for by building it into the cost of vaccines. Vaccines themselves are cheap. Traditionally, people weren't expected to understand vet or human medicine. It was thought that paying for something tangible was the only way a client would come to the vet. This is true if the clients aren't educated why the change has occurred. So, you take away the vaccines and many people stopped bringing their pets to the vet. They didn't understand the need for a preventative exam, especially if they had to pay for it. Vets would not see animals for three years and then " suddenly " there would be a chronic disease process that would now difficult to manage and the vet was blamed. It is crucial that the public is educated in this aspect. And, the new system is generally now working fine. Even human health insurance is starting to pay for adult " wellness exams " - they didn't always. So, you take away the primary income generating service of a vet clinic, and you have some very nervous vets or office owners (which do not have to be vets in some states). Wow, that was long winded. Anyway, the new information really isn't new anymore and it has been proven to be scientifically valid and clinics aren't closing down if managed properly. I hate to hear you have had problems. I hope you can find someone you trust. Have you read Foods That Pets Die For? It is a great little book about the horrible ingredients in pet foods. It is true that about 25% of small animal nutrition courses in school (much more as a graduate) is paid for by the pet food companies. But it is backed with research that is not always their own or conducted poorly (vegan ethics aside). I found the courses I took to be open minded with lots of questions and ongoing discussions. I had three different companies supply materials for the classroom and several others were present at " fairs. " This is much more nutrition than many human medical doctors have received in the past. I have found vets to be more knowledgeable in nutrition. However, I found the large animal nutrition course to be very narrow minded with no room for discussion that wasn't economically centered. And of course, each college has different instructors and attitudes. Something that I try to remember is to use the research as my foundation and then expand upon it because this type of system isn't present only in vet or human medicine. The only reason we know of the specific chemicals and actions in cranberries, for instance, is because the cranberry board paid for that research - not a medical group. We are seeing more studies done by medical groups though. And this is true for most everything, fertilizers, fibers for cloth, fuels or alternative fuels. Regarding the internet, you shouldn't be receiving so much attitude there either. Sure, I have seen many wacko sites.* But there is a lot of great info out there too. I had a client bring me a lengthy article from the internet about 10 years ago. Much of it was very good but there was a small amount of very poor information and some outdated info in it. I read that article and made notes for my client and gave her more printed info for her to read. I ended up creating a handout that referred to that website and used it as a positive educational tool for my renal failure cats. And I had a great relationship with this client and worked with her cat for a long time. I trusted her instinct to help her pet and she trusted me for allowing her to be involved in the decisions. What a concept! The internet isn't the only place with " bad " info. The library is full of it too. To be honest, I haven't moved forward technologically as fast as some, but I can't understand why having an almost unlimited source of info is so scary or offensive to some.* Having a client act as an advocate for their pet really does help me give that pet the best care. (Of course, unless I didn't want to continue to learn and change or I wanted to be a God.) I try to teach my family and friends to be advocates for their own health, their family and pets. But there is still resistance from them. Then they get mad when something goes " wrong. " My nephew had a growth that the lab reported as cancerous. The doctor either felt it wasn't right, or maybe always runs malignant results a second time, and found the growth was benign. But my FIL wanted to sue the lab AND the doctor. And recently, my neighbor just sat and watched her husband die post-surgery because one (and only one) nurse told her not to worry. My neighbor and her husband both knew something was wrong but she didn't get another nurse to look at him or request a doctor. (He even said " I am going to die " and was in such terrible pain he couldn't speak further. She just stroked his hand and mopped his brow for an hour until another nurse came in and freaked out.) And she is actually an intelligent woman. Go figure! So, I see fear and attitude in docs and complacency and attitude in patients. I just wish all parties could come together so there weren't " sides. " " It's really sad that a pediatrician's office can be such a dangerous place. " And it is so hard to educate " lemmings " no matter how gently. I worry to the point that I have to completely let go where my nephews are involved. All I try to convince my family to do is to research and think for themselves - not just do as I do. It seems this is just too much to ask. Sorry such a long post - self education and advocacy are obviously important to me. Carrol * When a client receives bad info, the vet does have to spend time " uneducating " the client. Also, tracking down the validity of information one is not familiar with can take a lot of time. So, it is reasonable that some vets feel that the internet creates more work for them in a very stressful job. It is different than having others do the research and attending the various seminars to gather the info and then come to your own conclusions. But, there are too many positives to the internet to try to abolish its presence in a vet practice. , Kadee M <abbey_road3012 wrote: > > I used to have such faith in doctors. We took Leah in for her shots perfectly on time every time, and whatever the doctor said to do, we did it. Then we started planning to get a dog, and I was reading on the internet about how to take care of one. I came across a lot of information about how harmful vaccines can be, and how vets try to make people vaccinate against even little non-life threatening diseases that even the vaccine isn't 100% effective against!! I made the decision then to not vaccinate our dogs. Then that got me to thinking, " what if the same thing is happening with my kids? " So I read up on that, and it's the exact same thing. The companies that make the vaccines are the ones telling us we need them, and most people are under the impression that our government is actually out to protect us so they go in like sheep and have their kids shot full of every vaccine on the planet. Sigh. > > That is infuriating when people badmouth the internet and then use it themselves. We feed our dogs homemade food, and a vet we used to go to flipped out on us. He said I shouldn't believe everything I read on the internet. Then when I told him I wasn't going to take crap from a guy whose nutrition courses in vet school were paid for by the company whose product just happened to be all over the office, he got mad and said he was on the internet every single day reading about different diets!! Stupid!! Our kids are all so lucky that we do the research we do. It's really sad that a pediatrician's office can be such a dangerous place. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2007 Report Share Posted March 19, 2007 That God complex was the main problem with the first vet we went to. We told him we wanted only parvo and distemper vaccines, and he gave two others after I'd told him I only wanted those two, just because he felt it was best, and a de-wormer without even asking me first. He also gave our dog with discoid lupus a rabies shot while she was under anesthesia. Then he told me raw diets were eeeeeevil, and pretty much said no one but a big pet food manufacturing company is capable of properly feeding a dog. He was such a jerk. We have a holistic vet right now, and it is SO NICE because she doesn't try to push stuff on us. She's a bit more expensive to go to than any of the conventional vets we've seen but worth every dime. She asks what we're doing as far as food, vaccines, lifestyle, etc. and she's not critical. She even did a bunch of reading on a vegetarian diet for dogs so she could help us get the supplements just right. Our dog Lucy had to go in for some dental work once when she broke some teeth out, the idiot dog, and one of the vet techs was trying to force me into getting Lucy a whole load of shots because she said Illinois law requires that pets going into surgery be " current " on all vaccinations. I told her if they shot my dog with any of that crap there would indeed be trouble, and sure enough they didn't. People need to educate themselves before they go off getting pets. We recently rescued 6 pet rats, and all of them had been living in ridiculously small cages, eating junk food their whole lives. How long does it take to read up on rats?? I did a little reading every night for a month or two and I felt comfortable taking care of them. For my dogs, I was online for an hour or two a night for well over a year, reading up on vaccines and diet and breeds and anything else I could find. I was prepared, and it paid off. Our dogs don't get sick, they don't have skin problems and we can feed them anything without upsetting their stomachs, they're alert and active and they're both excellent weights. We should be the people vets dream about having as clients!!! But instead that first vet we went to hated us because we weren't just like everybody else. Just like at the doctor with the kids. We drive them nuts with our questions and our knowledge. It's nice that we've got a holistic vet now, that makes life a million times easier. Even our conventional vet that we go to for our rats and mice is really open-minded about things, and she's no trouble for us at all. People who refuse to take their pets in for checkups shouldn't have them in the first place. Our older dog lived in a little pen at my parents' house for 8 years before we got her, and since she was about two her nose was pink. They never wondered what was wrong, and they never took her in about it. It turned out to be discoid lupus, and she'd been in an almost constant flare-up for six years!! My uncle's ex-wife has a sister with discoid lupus, and she said without treatment it's extremely painful. That's part of our reason for not vaccinating her... though we don't vaccinate the other adult and the puppy will get a rabies shot when he's a year. She had a nasty flare up when she got that rabies shot though. People I guess just don't think pets are worth taking to the vet. We've been laughed at for taking our pet mice and rats to the vet and it infuriates me. Shooting dogs full of vaccines shouldn't be used as a tool for business. People need to learn that their pets NEED checkups, and that vaccines are only part of the deal. But like you said, it's hard to educate lemmings!! It's amazing, there's so much information out there and people still breed their dogs and cats, and they still give the babies away free to whoever wants them. I respond to probably four or five freecycle ads per week when people are giving away free pets. I feel like somebody needs to tell these people what they're doing, and how awful it could be for the pet if the wrong person gets ahold of it. Someone last week was giving away an unneutered purebred beagle with papers. This is puppymill country!!! I saw that and went into a mad panic, e-mailed them as quickly as they could and I didn't hear back from them. People can be such idiots sometimes. Rrrgh. rtillmansmail <rtillmansmail wrote: Kadee, (This is long as many of my posts can be.) As a veterinarian, I can completely empathize with the attitude you may receive from some under-educated vets. I find that fear is the most common reason for this behavior (however, there are some that have a God Complex). While I practiced solo for a while, I also worked as an independent contractor or a " doc on the clock " and have had to listen to a lot of BS. In doing your own research, you probably found that the scientific research is collected by certain governing bodies (academies) and protocols are established to be practice guidelines for the general veterinarian. For instance, the American Association of Feline Practitioner for cats and the American Board of Veterinary Practitioners for dogs and other small animals. They both have protocols on vaccines, parasites, neutering, dental care, geriatric care etc. I realize that the military sometimes provides preventive vet services at a reduced cost. But you may be more comfortable finding a vet belonging to one of these groups. They absolutely do have protocols for reduced vaccines and longer vaccine intervals. You SHOULD be able to hold attitude free conversations with most of them. They should be involved in the latest research/education and want to bring that info to their clients. (Beware the vet that joins groups for advertising purposes but never pays attention to the info.) There are also veterinarians that provide alternative modalities such as herbal medicine, nosodes, acupuncture, etc. (Be sure to check their credentials in this area.) Anyway, sometimes understanding a person's fear makes it easier to accept, but not necessarily agree with, their view. In regard to fear and vaccines: 1. It is true that many vets are under educated and don't take the time to read the new research. But many adopt a wait and see approach. They want the research to be proven clinically over time. This can certainly be helpful at the beginning of a new idea but many people carry it too far, too long. There are some that are truly worried about being sued if an unvaccinated animal becomes ill or dies from a preventable disease under their care. This is a concern I have also heard voiced among pediatricians. There was some truth in this when the new information was surfacing, but really not now. 2. ALL businesses work on increasing gross income and decreasing expenses to be profitable. In a high overhead enterprise such as vet medicine, this can mean the difference between closing or remaining open. Paying the utilities and staff is the only way to be available to help animals. (This was different in the 70's when over head was low and has become less of a problem recently with new vets being taught practice management. I know there are some practices in large cities that do well but many vets make the same take home as a dental technician - 2 years of study vs. 8 -10 years with $100,000 in student loans. You can see where fear is building). Anyway, in the past the annual health exam has been charged for by building it into the cost of vaccines. Vaccines themselves are cheap. Traditionally, people weren't expected to understand vet or human medicine. It was thought that paying for something tangible was the only way a client would come to the vet. This is true if the clients aren't educated why the change has occurred. So, you take away the vaccines and many people stopped bringing their pets to the vet. They didn't understand the need for a preventative exam, especially if they had to pay for it. Vets would not see animals for three years and then " suddenly " there would be a chronic disease process that would now difficult to manage and the vet was blamed. It is crucial that the public is educated in this aspect. And, the new system is generally now working fine. Even human health insurance is starting to pay for adult " wellness exams " - they didn't always. So, you take away the primary income generating service of a vet clinic, and you have some very nervous vets or office owners (which do not have to be vets in some states). Wow, that was long winded. Anyway, the new information really isn't new anymore and it has been proven to be scientifically valid and clinics aren't closing down if managed properly. I hate to hear you have had problems. I hope you can find someone you trust. Have you read Foods That Pets Die For? It is a great little book about the horrible ingredients in pet foods. It is true that about 25% of small animal nutrition courses in school (much more as a graduate) is paid for by the pet food companies. But it is backed with research that is not always their own or conducted poorly (vegan ethics aside). I found the courses I took to be open minded with lots of questions and ongoing discussions. I had three different companies supply materials for the classroom and several others were present at " fairs. " This is much more nutrition than many human medical doctors have received in the past. I have found vets to be more knowledgeable in nutrition. However, I found the large animal nutrition course to be very narrow minded with no room for discussion that wasn't economically centered. And of course, each college has different instructors and attitudes. Something that I try to remember is to use the research as my foundation and then expand upon it because this type of system isn't present only in vet or human medicine. The only reason we know of the specific chemicals and actions in cranberries, for instance, is because the cranberry board paid for that research - not a medical group. We are seeing more studies done by medical groups though. And this is true for most everything, fertilizers, fibers for cloth, fuels or alternative fuels. Regarding the internet, you shouldn't be receiving so much attitude there either. Sure, I have seen many wacko sites.* But there is a lot of great info out there too. I had a client bring me a lengthy article from the internet about 10 years ago. Much of it was very good but there was a small amount of very poor information and some outdated info in it. I read that article and made notes for my client and gave her more printed info for her to read. I ended up creating a handout that referred to that website and used it as a positive educational tool for my renal failure cats. And I had a great relationship with this client and worked with her cat for a long time. I trusted her instinct to help her pet and she trusted me for allowing her to be involved in the decisions. What a concept! The internet isn't the only place with " bad " info. The library is full of it too. To be honest, I haven't moved forward technologically as fast as some, but I can't understand why having an almost unlimited source of info is so scary or offensive to some.* Having a client act as an advocate for their pet really does help me give that pet the best care. (Of course, unless I didn't want to continue to learn and change or I wanted to be a God.) I try to teach my family and friends to be advocates for their own health, their family and pets. But there is still resistance from them. Then they get mad when something goes " wrong. " My nephew had a growth that the lab reported as cancerous. The doctor either felt it wasn't right, or maybe always runs malignant results a second time, and found the growth was benign. But my FIL wanted to sue the lab AND the doctor. And recently, my neighbor just sat and watched her husband die post-surgery because one (and only one) nurse told her not to worry. My neighbor and her husband both knew something was wrong but she didn't get another nurse to look at him or request a doctor. (He even said " I am going to die " and was in such terrible pain he couldn't speak further. She just stroked his hand and mopped his brow for an hour until another nurse came in and freaked out.) And she is actually an intelligent woman. Go figure! So, I see fear and attitude in docs and complacency and attitude in patients. I just wish all parties could come together so there weren't " sides. " " It's really sad that a pediatrician's office can be such a dangerous place. " And it is so hard to educate " lemmings " no matter how gently. I worry to the point that I have to completely let go where my nephews are involved. All I try to convince my family to do is to research and think for themselves - not just do as I do. It seems this is just too much to ask. Sorry such a long post - self education and advocacy are obviously important to me. Carrol * When a client receives bad info, the vet does have to spend time " uneducating " the client. Also, tracking down the validity of information one is not familiar with can take a lot of time. So, it is reasonable that some vets feel that the internet creates more work for them in a very stressful job. It is different than having others do the research and attending the various seminars to gather the info and then come to your own conclusions. But, there are too many positives to the internet to try to abolish its presence in a vet practice. , Kadee M <abbey_road3012 wrote: > > I used to have such faith in doctors. We took Leah in for her shots perfectly on time every time, and whatever the doctor said to do, we did it. Then we started planning to get a dog, and I was reading on the internet about how to take care of one. I came across a lot of information about how harmful vaccines can be, and how vets try to make people vaccinate against even little non-life threatening diseases that even the vaccine isn't 100% effective against!! I made the decision then to not vaccinate our dogs. Then that got me to thinking, " what if the same thing is happening with my kids? " So I read up on that, and it's the exact same thing. The companies that make the vaccines are the ones telling us we need them, and most people are under the impression that our government is actually out to protect us so they go in like sheep and have their kids shot full of every vaccine on the planet. Sigh. > > That is infuriating when people badmouth the internet and then use it themselves. We feed our dogs homemade food, and a vet we used to go to flipped out on us. He said I shouldn't believe everything I read on the internet. Then when I told him I wasn't going to take crap from a guy whose nutrition courses in vet school were paid for by the company whose product just happened to be all over the office, he got mad and said he was on the internet every single day reading about different diets!! Stupid!! Our kids are all so lucky that we do the research we do. It's really sad that a pediatrician's office can be such a dangerous place. > > Kadee Sedtal Brain: " Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? " Pinky: " I think so, Brain, but if the plural of mouse is mice, wouldn't the plural of spouse be spice? " Check out my new , Classical 2 at http://launch.classical2/ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): TV's Guilty Pleasures list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.