Guest guest Posted December 13, 2003 Report Share Posted December 13, 2003 Actually, though, I've reached my fatigue level with this, anyway. If some sad conformist xtian needs or wants to post sick anti-women slogans, it's not a big deal, and no skin off my hot dog. In the interests of avoiding any and all censorship I am not even fully sure we need limit discussion here to what is pertinent to vegetarianism, although certainly there have been uproars in the past when other things are introduced. On Saturday, December 13, 2003, at 05:33 AM, wrote: > Message: 15 > Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:08:37 -0000 > " dave " <dave4sale > Re: And If, Then Proposition > > Ok, I see your point. This is a vegetarian forum after all so > something that is completely out of the realm of animal rights or > diet,- or at least something that affects vegetarians / animals in > some way like the environment- should really be on an OT post, if at > all. Now if someone wanted to post and argue the pros of eating > meat, I would fully support their right to do so. And maybe we could > convince them they are misinformed. > " Child sex abuse in the Church. unpleasant as it is, may do less permanent damage to the children than bringing them up Catholic in the first place " . --Richard Dawkins, Biologist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.