Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Need letters fast!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Please help! :)

 

In a message dated 4/27/05 2:31:21 PM Pacific Daylight

Time, Kim Sturla writes:

 

Hey folks, we really need your help. The first hearing

of our bill to outlaw the slaughter of animals on high

school campuses is May 4. We need the last surge of

emails to Education Committee members and we need a

good showing the day of the hearing. If you can

attend, please let me know and I will email you exact

time (after 1 pm) and room location. Thanks

>

>

>

> AB1685, by Assemblyman Johan Klehs, would do two

things: end the slaughter of any animal on school

property and permit students the opportunity to

opt-out of certain portions of the agricultural class.

>

>

>

> WHY SUPPORT:

>

> • Approximately 30% of high schools surveyed

slaughter on campus.

>

> • Violent displays can harm children: Educators

and child advocates contend slaughtering animals is an

inappropriate activity for high school campuses.

>

> • It is a poor use of limited educational monies.

>

> • The Manteca School Board outlawed the practice

in 2003 for health and animal welfare reasons.

>

> • We should cultivate intelligent discourse and

respect, instead of using violent methods to

“educate.â€

>

> • Animal agricultural vocational education

programs should focus on teaching marketable skills

– the niche for slaughtering animals in the

workforce is very limited. There are more job

opportunities, for example, in the companion animal

field.

>

> • Two decades ago, California enacted a law

permitting students to opt-out of dissections on moral

grounds. No law currently exists to allow students in

agricultural classes to opt-out of practices that

cause harm to animals.

>

>

>

> Please do 3 things

>

> 1. Email members of the Assembly Committee on

Education and urge them to support AB1685.

>

> 2. Attend the hearing May 4th. It will be around

1:30 (exact time and location to be determined

later)

>

> 3. Pass this alert on to others.

>

>

>

> Members of the Assembly Committee on Education:

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Jackie Goldberg, Chair

>

> Assemblymember.Goldberg

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Juan Arambula

>

> Assemblymember.Arambula

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Loni Hancock

>

> Assemblymember.hancock

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Carol Liu

>

> Assemblymember.Liu

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Fran Pavley

>

> Assemblymember.Pavley

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Tom Umberg

>

> Assemblymember.Umberg

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Mark Wyland

>

> Assemblymember.Wyland

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Joe Coto

>

> Assemblymember.Coto

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Bob Huff

>

> assemblymember.huff

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Gene Mullin

>

> Assemblymember.mullin

>

>

>

> Assemblymember Keith Richman

>

> Assemblymember.Richman

>

>

>

> The bill is being sponsored by Animal Place and HSUS

>

>

>

 

 

Forwarded Message

KimSturla

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:31:21 EDT

(no subject)

KimSturla

 

HTML Attachment [ Download File | Save to

Briefcase ]

 

Hey folks, we really need your help. The first hearing

of our bill to outlaw the slaughter of animals on high

school campuses is May 4. We need the last surge of

emails to Education Committee members and we need a

good showing the day of the hearing. If you can

attend, please let me know and I will email you exact

time (after 1 pm) and room location. Thanks

 

 

 

AB1685, by Assemblyman Johan Klehs, would do two

things: end the slaughter of any animal on school

property and permit students the opportunity to

opt-out of certain portions of the agricultural class.

 

 

 

WHY SUPPORT:

 

• Approximately 30% of high schools surveyed

slaughter on campus.

 

• Violent displays can harm children: Educators and

child advocates contend slaughtering animals is an

inappropriate activity for high school campuses.

 

• It is a poor use of limited educational monies.

 

• The Manteca School Board outlawed the practice in

2003 for health and animal welfare reasons.

 

• We should cultivate intelligent discourse and

respect, instead of using violent methods to

“educate.â€

 

• Animal agricultural vocational education programs

should focus on teaching marketable skills – the

niche for slaughtering animals in the workforce is

very limited. There are more job opportunities, for

example, in the companion animal field.

 

• Two decades ago, California enacted a law

permitting students to opt-out of dissections on moral

grounds. No law currently exists to allow students in

agricultural classes to opt-out of practices that

cause harm to animals.

 

 

 

Please do 3 things

 

1. Email members of the Assembly Committee on

Education and urge them to support AB1685.

 

2. Attend the hearing May 4th. It will be around 1:30

(exact time and location to be determined

later)

 

3. Pass this alert on to others.

 

 

 

Members of the Assembly Committee on Education:

 

 

 

Assemblymember Jackie Goldberg, Chair

 

Assemblymember.Goldberg

 

 

 

Assemblymember Juan Arambula

 

Assemblymember.Arambula

 

 

 

Assemblymember Loni Hancock

 

Assemblymember.hancock

 

 

 

Assemblymember Carol Liu

 

Assemblymember.Liu

 

 

 

Assemblymember Fran Pavley

 

Assemblymember.Pavley

 

 

 

Assemblymember Tom Umberg

 

Assemblymember.Umberg

 

 

 

Assemblymember Mark Wyland

 

Assemblymember.Wyland

 

 

 

Assemblymember Joe Coto

 

Assemblymember.Coto

 

 

 

Assemblymember Bob Huff

 

assemblymember.huff

 

 

 

Assemblymember Gene Mullin

 

Assemblymember.mullin

 

 

 

Assemblymember Keith Richman

 

Assemblymember.Richman

 

 

 

The bill is being sponsored by Animal Place and HSUS

 

 

 

 

" All beings tremble before violence. All fear death. All love life. See

yourself in others. Then whom can you hurt? What harm can you do? "

~Buddha

 

If you agree that a dog or cat (or a chimpanzee or lion or gorilla) is

significantly different than a book or a car or your shoes, then the notion that

they should be treated differently in the eyes of the law is common sense. That

animals see, hear, breathe and feel is undisputed — books, cars and shoes do

not. The idea of guardianship versus ownership flows naturally from the

distinction and simply recognizes it as a legal principle.

~Bruce Wagman

Co-Author, Animal Law

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...