Oh dear - my last post confused!! Please read this - Kathleen, Aurora

[Guest guest]

So sorry, Kathleen - last post was addressed to you because you copied in

my previous post to Aurora (and of course all) and I answered it as if my

previous post had been addressed to you.

 

Therefore, my paragraph referring to your suggestion that your previous post

might be deleted is not properly addressed to you - it was Aurora who wrote

that.

 

I think you'll understand how I made the mistake - you left in my previous

message that had been addressed to someone else. Of course you are free to

comment on any post at any time - but your apology was taken by me to refer

to that post, understandably I think. I don't always check back on all previous

messages by the writer and others before responding, but respond to the post

as it stands. I guess most people do.

 

In any case, no criticism attaches to you or to Aurora and my comments, if

considered to be addressed to both of you, stand ;=) I think they are valid, I

think they are non-critical, and I would have hoped they were helpful.

 

I am copying in the problematic par from my last post. The 'you' and 'your' are

misdirected. Nevertheless, I do believe that that is the part of my message you

were responding to? But I should have written 'my responsse to Aurora's

message' etc etc etc.

 

Best,

Pat

Pat wrote:

>What you are responding to here is *my* response to your message

requesting venues for buying meat that was farmed compassionately. You

said you would understand if your request was deleted since it may be

unsuitable for this forum. I did not delete. Indeed, I answered you explaining

why it was unsuitable but, if you look, actually making a suggestion as to

where and how you could find the information you seek.