Vegan Police

[Guest guest]

Thank you, Susan:

 

My definition is " practically vegan. " I coined the

term and I believe that I should define it. I am

" practically vegan " for practical reasons: I don't

want to take artificial pills to get my B12.

 

I agree with you. There are different reasons for

being vegan. Mine are my own. I am keeping my

definitions straight. Are you keeping yours straight?

 

In my request for criticism I was not asking for

criticism of my morality, ethics and religion. I was

asking for suggestions and criticism of the health and

wellness aspects of eating 3 ozs of chicken a month.

Some people have reacted as if it is a sin to eat 3

ozs of chicken. Actually, I'm not Christian, so I

don't even care about that. I'm concerned with health

and wellness. All the response to my request for

criticism has been about sin, right and wrong, correct

definitions, morality, etc. What a misunderstanding!

--- Susan Cogan <susan-brassfield wrote:

> >Ron: Apparently there are different reasons for

> being vegan

> >and different definitions of what vegan is. I am

> > " practically vegan " for health and wellness

> reasons.

> >I don't have anything against killing chickens. In

> >fact, I have wrung the necks of 20 or more of them

> in

> >an hour.

> >

> >Let's keep our definitions and opinions straight,

> >okay?

>

> I always thought vegan meant no animal products at

> all. I'm not a

> vegan. As long as there is brie in the world, I will

> never be a

> vegan. :-)

>

> However, being any version of vegetarian isn't like

> taking holy

> orders and I think it's fine to take a detour now

> and then if you

> want to.

>

> Susan

> --

> ---------

> Please visit my website:

> http://members.cox.net/sbcogan

>

> Also, check out an excerpt of " Jubilee, " which will

> be published in

> the next few months:

> http://members.cox.net/sbcogan/writing.html

>

 

 

 

 

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.

http://mailplus.