Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE: Respnding to Nora

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

You are right on Washington State Medicial Association opposing I-1000. I

should have never mentioned that and nobody should EVER accept doctors

diagnosis of terminal either!

 

That statement about animals & humans was written after 1AM. I would

clarify, simply to state that humans and animals are NOT the same and should

NOT be treated the same. I am NOT a hunter, factory worker, or vivisectors

and have NEVER been any one of them!

 

Giving someone the NEW right to choose to kill themselves is NOT having

their best interest at heart!

 

On Behalf Of Nora Lenz

Monday, November 03, 2008 8:03 AM

Re: Respnding to Blanc

 

 

 

Jim,

I assume the reason you mentioned that medical professionals oppose I-1000

was to give credence to your own position. Knowing what we all know about

how flawed and fraudulent medicine is, aligning yourself with them does

not

do you credit. It's not hard to figure out why a medical association would

oppose this initiative. Slow lingering deaths are lucrative. Personally,

anytime the medical profession backs something I tend to run the other

direction, but the truth is there are lots of individual doctors who

support

this initiative. It's really the system that opposes it, because the

system

is heartless and cold and always goes for the money.

 

" The taking of a human life can't be justified...I wonder how many of you

that are voting YES on I-1000 would support a similar measure that applied

to animals?!? "

 

This is the kind of accusation we usually hear from vivisectors, hunters

and

factory farmers. Well, your challenge doesn't work because we already

perform the act of merciful death on animals too sick to recover. It's

legal and it's a loving and compassionate thing to do, if circumstances

warrant it. It is not those who support I-1000 who have the double

standard, Jim, it is *you*. One way for animals (they are disposable),

another way for humans (they are too special to die). I guess now you'll

say that you want to remove the option of euthanasia for animals, too.

 

Thanks for offering to coach our dying loved ones and make them see the

error of their ways. But knowing that if you're not able to convince them

to get healthy you would subject them to a cruel and prolonged death, I'll

pass. You can't really have their interests at heart, anyway, if you would

take away the option of escape that the rest of us take for granted.

 

Nora

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...