Guest guest Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Raw-food diets may offer healthier lifestyle But critics say the body loses certain nutrients with strict adherence By Kim Pierce, McClatchy News Service April 25, 2008 DALLAS — A raw-food diet — basically raw fruits, vegetables and whole grains — has plenty of advocates, but whether it's the right choice for a cancer patient is open to question. In a matter of seconds, you can find numerous testimonials online about its health benefits. However, finding peer-reviewed scientific studies, much less specific research on raw foods and cancer, is harder. " There are only a couple dozen studies worldwide on relationships between raw-foods diets and anything else, " says Suzanne Havala Hobbs, a registered dietitian with a special interest in vegetarian nutrition who has tracked the raw-foods movement. She knows of no studies on raw foods and cancer. " What you could say about a raw-foods diet and cancer risk or cancer treatment could be something that's extrapolated and kind of surmised, " she says, " based upon the body of evidence related to diet and cancer in general. " Still, Hobbs, who's on the faculty in the school of public health at the University of North Carolina, is far from dismissive. " I am fascinated by some of the claims made by raw foodists, " she says. " But I'm cautious about them, as well. I am sympathetic and skeptical at the same time. " When she conducted what she calls a small, low-tech study in 2005 on raw-food attitudes, practices and beliefs, the top reason for adopting a raw-food diet was health, especially protection from disease and faster healing. Full story: http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080425/ENT07/304300010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.