Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Jeff, I just want to say that I agree with your representation of supplementing as more of a psychological crutch than a physiological necessity. It's obviously true that we'd be healthier if we were eating perfect foods but fortunately this is not necessary in order for us to enjoy a very high level of health. If nature required us to be perfect, cooked food eaters wouldn't last 50-80 years like they typically do. Besides, whatever shortcomings might exist in our foods, supplements cannot compensate for them. If nutrient deficiency was inevitable for people who don't supplement, I don't suppose I'd even be living because I've never supplemented. My health just continues to improve the longer I'm raw. Whenever I do get a nagging symptom, I can always trace it back to some mistake I've made in the eating department, like too much fat, too much food overall, eating too late in the evening, miscombining, etc. I think raw fooders would have a whole lot fewer problems if they did this as a practice rather than entertaining thoughts of nutrient deficiency whenever they become symptomatic. Taking supplements often suppresses symptoms the same way drugs or herbs do. Meanwhile, the real cause of the symptoms (most often excess, not deficiency) goes unaddressed. The truth is, raw fooders are the least likely people on earth to become nutrient deficient, not only because we don't kill our nutrients with heat but because our bodies are far more efficient at breaking down and utilizing the nutrients we consume. It has always baffled me why there is so much fear of nutrient deficiency in the raw world. I wrote an article about this topic on my website (http://www.rawschool.com/nutrientdeficiency.htm) for anyone who's interested. Best wishes, Nora www.RawSchool.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 I believe you are right - raw foodists are eating a whole category of diet (raw food diet) missed by 99.???% of the world. For 10's of millions of years our ancestors were eating raw foods. So, just eating raw foods is a huge step. I don't know just how much fear there is in the raw world, as you say. I realize some may supplement. I don't know how many. From some conversations I've had, many don't think its a bad thing and don't seem to worry, it's just a simple precaution. So, in that case, they don't seem to fearful. I agree that the way we eat will affect the body's production/ assimilation of B12. If we overeat, eat too frequently, eat complicated meals (many different foods combined together), and/or eat too many fats and proteins our bodies will not be as efficient regarding B12 production and absorption. Jeff On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Nora Lenz wrote: > The truth is, raw fooders are the least likely people on earth to > become nutrient deficient, not only because we don't kill our > nutrients with heat but because our bodies are far more efficient at > breaking down and utilizing the nutrients we consume. It has always > baffled me why there is so much fear of nutrient deficiency in the > raw world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.